Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 07 November 2022
Sec. Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Basidiomycete Fungi: From Biosystematics and Biodiversity to Biotechnology View all 21 articles

Taxonomy and multi-gene phylogeny of Micropsalliota (Agaricales, Agaricaceae) with description of six new species from China

  • 1Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Fungal Resource, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Forest Ecosystem Protection and Restoration of Poyang Lake Watershed, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
  • 3Institute of Edible Mushroom, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, China
  • 4National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Breeding and Cultivation of Features Edible Mushroom, Fuzhou, China
  • 5Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing, China
  • 6State Environmental Protection Scientific Observation and Research Station for Ecological Environment of Wuyi Mountains, Nanjing, China

Micropsalliota is a relatively small genus containing only 62 previously identified species. Here, we describe six new taxa of Micropsalliota based on morphological and phylogenetic analyses: M. minor, M. ovalispora, M. pseudodelicatula, M. rufosquarrosa, M. tenuipes, and M. wuyishanensis and a new record taxon to China. The first Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of a three-gene dataset (ITS, LSU, and rpb2) separated the genus into 18 weakly to strongly supported major clades and subclades, but only a few subclades were synapomorphies. According to phylogenetic analyses, M. cornuta does not belong in Micropsalliota. A key to 20 species of Micropsalliota in China is provided.

Introduction

Micropsalliota Höhn. was circumscribed in 1914 based on the type species M. pseudovolvulata Höhn., which was collected from the Bogor Botanical Gardens, Indonesia, by the Austrian mycologist Höhnel in 1907 (Höhnel, 1914). It was once founded on inappropriate characters and considered a dubious genus. Later it was amended by Heinemann (1956) and Pegler and Rayner (1969), and accepted by Singer (1975). A molecular phylogenetic analysis based on ITS and LSU sequences has confirmed that Micropsalliota is monophyletic and sister to Hymenagaricus (Zhao et al., 2010). Species of Micropsalliota are characterized by the presence of usually small, gracile basidiomes with a membranous partial veil, dark spore prints, frequently capitate or subcapitate cheilocystidia, incrusted pileipellis hyphae that turn green in ammonia solution, and, in most species, basidiospores with an apically thickened endosporium and lacking a germ pore (Heinemann, 1977; Zhao et al., 2010).

Micropsalliota is not a very species-rich genus: only 79 names (62 species and five varieties), including synonyms, were listed in Index Fungorum (www.indexfungorum.org). Species of Micropsalliota are mainly distributed in tropical and subtropical Africa, America, and Asia (Heinemann, 1977, 1980, 1983, 1988, 1989; Heinemann and Flower, 1983; Heinemann and Leelavathy, 1991; Guzmán-Dávalos, 1992; Guzmán-Dávalos and Heinemann, 1994; Zhao et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2016; Parra et al., 2016; He et al., 2020; Crous et al., 2021; Al-Kharousi et al., 2022). Beginning with the discovery of M. pseudoglobocystis Li Wei and R. L. Zhao, 13 species, of which four are new, have been reported in China (Li et al., 2015, 2021; Wei et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021). During our ongoing study of Chinese macrofungi initiated in 2018, the high species diversity of this genus in subtropical China has attracted our attention. In this paper, we present the results of molecular phylogenetic study based on ITS, LSU, and rpb2 sequence datasets, examine the morphological synapomorphies of the different phylogenetic clades, and describe six new and a new recorded species from subtropical China based on morphological and molecular data.

Materials and methods

Morphological studies

Macroscopic descriptions and habitat details were based on detailed field notes of fresh basidiomata and photos. Color codes follow the Methuen Handbook of Color (Kornerup and Wanscher, 1978). Measuring stature follows the IG value (IG = St2/D × d, St = the length of the stipe, D = the diameter of the pileus, d = the diameter of the stipe): the corresponding value of slender is 50–150 and stout is 10–30 (Heinemann, 1983). Microscopic structures were observed and measured from dried specimens mounted in water, 5% KOH, 10% NH4OH, or Melzer's reagent. Congo red was used as a stain when necessary (Horak, 2005). A minimum of 80 basidiospores, 20 basidia, and 40 cystidia per specimen were randomly measured using an Olympus BX53 microscope. The measurements and Q values are recorded as (a)b–c(d), in which “a” is the lowest value, “b–c” covers a minimum of 90% of the values, and “d” is the highest value. Mean spore size is indicated by “av.”, and “Q” stands for the ratio of the length and width of a spore (Bas, 1969; Yu et al., 2020). Specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Fungi, Jiangxi Agricultural University (HFJAU).

DNA extraction and sequencing

DNA was extracted from dried specimens with the NuClean Plant Genomic DNA kit (CWBIO, China) (Ge et al., 2021; Na et al., 2022). Three regions (ITS, LSU, rpb2) were selected for the study and were amplified using the primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 (White et al., 1990), LR0R/LR7 (Hopple and Vilgalys, 1999), and 6F/7.1R (Matheny, 2005), respectively. PCR was performed using a touchdown program for all regions: 5 min at 95°C, 1 min at 95°C, 30 s at 65°C (adding −1°C per cycle), 1 min at 72°C, cycle 15 times; 1 min at 95°C, 30 s at 50°C, 1 min at 72°C, cycle 20 times; 10 min at 72°C (Bau and Yan, 2021). The sequencing was performed by Qing Ke Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Wuhan City, China).

Data analyses

All 240 nucleotide DNA sequences (ITS, LSU, and rpb2) of Micropsalliota in NCBI GenBank were downloaded. After discarding sequences shorter than 250 bp, 173 sequences were retained. In addition, 77 sequences were generated from our collected specimens. The Agaricus crassisquamosus R. L. Zhao, A. trisulphuratus Berk., A. variicystis Linda J. Chen, K. D. Hyde and R. L. Zhao, Hymenagaricus epipastus (Berk. and Broome) Heinem. and Little Flower, and H. sp. were chosen as outgroup taxa according to the results of Zhao et al. (2010) and Li et al. (2021). A total of 250 sequences (137 ITS, 84 LSU, 29 rpb2) representing 139 taxa were used in subsequent analyses. Details are presented in Supplementary Table S1.

ITS, LSU, and rpb2 sequence datasets were separately aligned on the MAFFT online server using the E-INS-i option for ITS and the L-INS-i option for LSU and rpb2 (Katoh et al., 2019). Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses of the aligned concatenated dataset were carried out in MrBayes v.3.2.7a and IQTREE v.2.1.2, respectively (Nguyen et al., 2014) via the CIPRES web portal. For the BI analyses, optimal evolutionary models were selected using PartitionFinder2 (Lanfear et al., 2017) with the greedy algorithm and the AICc criterion. Four Monte Carlo Markov chains were run for 2 million generations, with the first 25% of trees discarded as burn-in (Ronquist et al., 2012). For the ML analysis, models of sequence evolution were assessed in IQ-Tree prior to the analysis. The ML analysis was conducted using the ultrafast bootstrap option with 1,000 replicates and allowing partitions to have different seeds (-spp). A nexus file, which is generated by Mesquite (Maddison 2008), contains an alignment sequence, and the original tree of ML and Bayes is deposited in Supplementary material 2.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

A total of 2,645 characters were used in subsequent analyses (ITS, 764 bp; LSU, 1,230 bp; rpb2, 651 bp), of which 735 sites were variable and 590 were parsimony informative. The best-fit models used for the phylogenetic analyses were as follows: for the BI analysis, GTR + I + G for ITS, LSU; SYM + I + G for rpb2 partitions; for the ML analysis, TVM + F + I + G4 for ITS, TN + F + I + G4 for LSU, and TNe + G4 for rpb2. The log-likelihood of the ML consensus tree was −14,153.009, and the average standard deviation of split frequencies was < 0.01 after 1,750,000 generations in the BI analysis. In the resulting trees, clades with a Bayesian posterior probability (BI-PP) ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (ML-BP) ≥ 75% were considered to be well-supported (Wang et al., 2022).

As shown in the phylogenetic tree in Figure 1, all taxa of Micropsalliota, except for M. cornuta Har. Takah. and Taneyama, formed a well-supported monophyletic lineage (BI-PP = 1; ML-BP = 100%). The type specimen of M. cornuta fell outside of Micropsalliota and formed a well-supported lineage with A. trisulphuratus collected from Togo (West Africa) and Thailand. The ITS sequences of these two species were 99% similar. The well-supported lineage closest to the root is taken as Clade. Four major lineages meet the definition (Clade B, C, D, E). Although Clade A does not form well-supported lineages, it contains only five species and forms a sister group with Clade B, so we also treat it as major Clade. Within Micropsalliota, in total, four Clade (Clade B, C, D, E) and 12 subclades (/albofelina, /allantoidea, /bifida, /furfuracea, /megaspore, /pleurocystidiata, /rufosquarrosa, and five distinct lineages represent independent species separately in Area F) were strongly supported, /arginea were only strongly supported in BI analyses and a major clade (Clade A) was weakly supported. They are described further below. Among the 20 species present in China, six were new taxa constituting individual lineages (BI-PP = 1; ML-BP = 100%) that were clearly distinct from closely related taxa.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Phylogram of Micropsalliota generated by Bayesian inference (BI) analysis based on sequences of a concatenated data set from three nuclear genes (ITS, LSU, and rpb2), rooted with Agaricus spp. and Hymenagaricus spp. Posterior probabilities (BI-PP) ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap (ML-BP) ≥ 75% are shown as PP/BP. • indicates newly described taxa.

Clade A was not supported but contained three well-supported subclades: /megaspore contained two species (M. megaspora R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde and M. repanda Heinem.); /furfuracea consisted of a single species (M. furfuracea R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde); /pleurocystidiata comprised M. pleurocystidiata Heinem. and Little Flower, M. xanthorubescens Heinem., and an unknown species.

Clade B was strongly supported (BI-PP = 0.98; ML-BP = 87%) and included five well-supported subclades: /rufosquarrosa comprised M. rufosquarrosa (new taxon) and M. cf. roseipes Heinem.; /bifida consisted of 14 species, of which three were new (M. minor, M. pseudodelicatula, and M. tenuipes) formed separate lineages and were clearly distinct. The three sequences of M. subarginea Heinem., all from Thailand, formed separate lineages, respectively; /allantoidea contained a new species (M. ovalispora) and a known species from Thailand (M. allantoidea R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde), /arginea consisted of three species [M. arginea (Berk. and Broome) Pegler and R. W. Rayner, M. brunneosquamata Linda J. Chen, R. L. Zhao and K. D. Hyde, and M. geesterani (Bas and Heinem.) R. L. Zhao and L. A. Parra]; /albofelina consisted of a single species (M. albofelina D. D. Ivanova and O. V. Morozova).

Clade D was strongly supported (BI-PP = 1; ML-BP = 96%) and consisted of five known species (M. globocystis Heinem., M. megarubescens R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde, M. pseudoglobocystis, M. purpureobrunneola M. Q. He and R. L. Zhao, and M. digitatocystis R. L. Zhao, J. X. Li and M. Q. He). But the sequences of M. globocystis from China and Thailand formed five distinct lineages.

Clade C and E contained only one species M. cortinata (Heinem.) Heinem. and M. rubrobrunnescens R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde, separately. Area F consisted of five unaggregated lineages: the new species M. wuyishanensis, three known species (M. lateritia var. vinaceipes R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong & K. D. Hyde, M. suthepensis R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde, and M. ventricocystidiata Al-Sadi and S. Hussain), and an undetermined specimen from India.

Taxonomy

Micropsalliota minor J. Q. Yan sp. nov.

MycoBank: 842891

Etymology: Referring to its small basidiomata.

Diagnosis: Differs from M. pusillissima by bigger basidiospores, which are longer than 5 μm. (Figures 2AC, 3, 10A)

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Basidiomata. (A–C) Micropsalliota minor; (D) M. ovalispora; (EG) M. pseudodelicatula; (H) M. cf. roseipes; (I–K) M. rufosquarrosa; (L) M. tenuipes; (M) M. wuyishanensis. Scale bars: 10 mm.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Micropsalliota minor. (A) Basidiospores; (B) basidia; (C) cheilocystidia; (D) pileipellis hyphae. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Basidiomata slender (IG = 40–192). Pileus 2.5–6.0 mm in diameter, white (1A1) to cream (2A1) when young, with light brown (6C6–6D6) tone in age, hemispherical, expanding to plano-convex, surface dry, glabrous to finely powdery fibrillose, margin appendiculate. Context less than 0.3 mm thick. Lamellae 0.2–0.5 mm broad, free, subdistant, with two series of lamellulae, white (1A1) becoming light brown (6C6–6D6) as mature. Stipe 12–17 × 0.3–0.6 mm, cylindrical, hollow, white (1A1), surface with white (1A1) fibrils, which easily fall off. Annulus single, membranous, median, white (1A1) to cream (2A1), which easily falls off.

Basidiospores (5.0) 5.5–6.0 (6.5) × 3.0–3.7 μm, av. = 5.7 × 3.4 μm, Q = (1.40) 1.50–1.82 (1.90), ellipsoid to elongated in face view, amygdaliform in profile view, light brown, wall 0.2–0.4 μm thick, apically thickened endosporium indistinct, without germ pore, inamyloid. Basidia 11–16 (17.5) × 5.5–6.5 (7.0) μm, clavate, hyaline, 2- or 4-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia (25) 29–45.5 (48) × (6.0) 6.5–11 μm, hyaline, tibiiform or lageniform, apex capitate, up to 4.0–6.0 μm in diameter or forked with capitate or obtuse to truncate apex. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae 4.0–6.0 μm in diameter, hyaline, constricted at the septa on some hyphae.

Habit and habitat: Scattered on moss layer in mixed forests.

Specimens examined: CHINA. Zhejiang Province, Lishui City, Qingtian County, Huixu Village, 5 Aug 2021, Jun-Qing Yan, HFJAU2812, holotype; 6 Aug 2021, Jun-Qing Yan and Zhi-Heng Zeng, HFJAU2796; Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Agricultural University, 3 Jun 2021, Jun-Qing Yan, HFJAU1259.

Notes: Micropsalliota minor formed an independent lineage in the phylogenetic tree. Morphologically, four Micropsalliota species (M. alba Heinem. and Little Flower, M. albosericea Heinem. and Leelav., M. delicatula R. L. Zhao, J. X. Li and M. Q. He, and M. tenuipes) have the same combination of small basidiomata with pileus generally less than 10 mm in diameter, white pileus, and basidiospores longer than 5.5 μm as M. minor, but none of them have the forked cheilocystidia (Heinemann and Flower, 1983; Zhao et al., 2010; Li et al., 2021). Another species, M. bifida R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde, has variable (including forked) cheilocystidia, but its basidiospores are shorter than 5 μm (Zhao et al., 2010).

Micropsalliota ovalispora J. Q. Yan sp. nov.

MycoBank: 842892

Etymology: Referring to its oval basidiospores in face view.

Diagnosis: Differs from M. arginea in having ovoid basidiospores. (Figures 2D, 4, 10B)

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Micropsalliota ovalispora. (A) Basidiospores; (B) basidia; (C) cheilocystidia; (D) pileipellis hyphae. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Basidiomata slender to stout (IG = 22–62). Pileus 5.0–7.0 mm in diameter, white (1A1), orange-gray (6B2) with age, convex, expanding to plane, with obtuse umbo, surface dry, glabrous to fibrillose. Context less than 0.5 mm thick. Lamellae 0.5–0.7 mm broad, free, moderately distant, with 2 series of lamellulae, white (1A1) becoming light brown (7D5–7D6) as mature. Stipe 7.5–12.5 × 0.5–1.0 mm, cylindrical, white (1A1), surface with white (1A1) fibrils. Annulus unobserved.

Basidiospores 4.0–5.0 × (2.0) 2.5–3.0 μm, av. = 4.5 × 2.7 μm, Q = (1.43) 1.55–1.85 (2.00), oval, rarely ellipsoid to elongate in face view, amygdaliform in profile view, light brown in water, darker in alkaline solution, wall 0.2–0.3 μm thick, apically thickened endosporium indistinct, without germ pore, inamyloid. Basidia 12.5–18.5 × 5.0–6.5 μm clavate, hyaline, 4-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia (22) 25.5–40 (42) × 4.0–8.5 (10.5) μm, lageniform, apex capitate, (4.0) 5.0–7.5 (8.0) in diameter. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae 4.5–11 μm in diameter, constricted at the septa on some hyphae, with small dark brown incrusted pigment granules in water, which dissolves in 5% KOH.

Habit and habitat: Scattered on soil in broad-leaved forests.

Specimens examined: CHINA. Zhejiang Province, Lishui City, Suichang County, Jiulong Mountain Reserve, 15 Jul 2020, Jun-Qing Yan, HFJAU2010, holotype; 17 Jul 2020, Jun-Qing Yan and Bin-Rong Ke, HFJAU3179.

Notes: In the phylogenetic tree, M. ovalispora formed an independent lineage and grouped with M. allantoidea, but the latter has a grayish brown pileus and longer basidiospores (5.3–6.5 μm) (Zhao et al., 2010). Morphologically, only a few other species in the genus match the characteristics of M. ovalispora. Micropsalliota arginea, M. cinnamomeopallida Singer, M. plumeria (Berk. and Broome) Höhn., M. pseudoarginea Heinem., and M. tenuipes are similar to M. ovalispora in having a white pileus and 5.0–10 μm in diameter, but none of them have oval basidiospores (Pegler and Rayner, 1969; Heinemann, 1980; Heinemann and Leelavathy, 1991; Zhao et al., 2010). In addition, M. arginea, M. pseudoarginea, M. ovalispora, and M. tenuipes are in distinct lineages in the phylogenetic tree (this paper); pileipellis of M. cinnamomeopallida has brownish vacuolar pigment (Heinemann, 1980; Heinemann and Leelavathy, 1991); pileus of M. plumeria has rusty brown disc (Zhao et al., 2010).

Micropsalliota pseudodelicatula J. Q. Yan sp. nov.

MycoBank: 842893

Etymology: Referring to its morphological similarity to M. delicatula.

Diagnosis: Differs from M. delicatula in having smaller basidiospores (4.3–5.5 × 2.7–3.3 μm). (Figures 2EG, 5, 10C)

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Micropsalliota pseudodelicatula. (A) Basidiospores; (B) basidia; (C) cheilocystidia; (D) pileipellis hyphae. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Basidiomata slender (IG = 50–93). Pileus 4.0–5.0 mm in diameter, white (1A1), convex to applanate, then nearly plane, surface dry, covered with white (1A1) scurfy scales or fibrils. Context less than 0.5 mm thick. Lamellae 0.5–1.0 mm broad, free, subdistant, with 2 series of lamellulae, white (1A1) becoming grayish red (7B2–7B3) to chestnut-brown (8D4–8E5) as mature, edge white (1A1). Stipe 8.0–15 × 0.3–1.0 mm, cylindrical, slender, hollow, white (1A1), surface with white (1A1) fibrils, base unexpanded, or slightly expanded to the shape of suction cup. Annulus single, membranous, persistent, superior to medium, white (1A1).

Basidiospores (4.0) 4.3–5.5 × (2.5) 2.7–3.3 μm, av. = 4.9 × 3.0 μm, Q = (1.39) 1.48–1.83 (1.95), ellipsoid to elongated in face view, amygdaliform in profile view, light brown, wall 0.2–0.4 μm thick, apically thickened endosporium indistinct, without germ pore, inamyloid. Basidia 11–14 × 3.5–6.0 μm, clavate, hyaline, 4- or 2-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia 29–40 (43) × (4.0) 5.0–8.5 (9) μm, often in clusters, tibiiform, few lageniform, apex capitate 6.0–9.0 μm in diameter. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae 6.0–15 μm in diameter, hyaline, constricted at the septa on some hyphae.

Habit and habitat: Gregarious on red soil in forest.

Specimens examined: CHINA. Zhejiang Province, Suichang County, Sanren She nationality township, 29 May 2020, Jun-Qing Yan and Qin Na, HFJAU2228, holotype; Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Agricultural University, 26 Jun 2019, Jun-Qing Yan, HFJAU1291.

Notes: Micropsalliota pseudodelicatula, which forms an independent lineage in subclade /bifida, is easily confused with M. delicatula. However, M. delicatula has larger basidispores, 5.2–6.6 × 3.0–4.1 μm (Li et al., 2021). In addition, M. alba, M. albella M. Q. He and R. L. Zhao, M. albosericea, M. minor, M. pulverulenta Heinem. and Leelav., and M. pusillissima R. L. Zhao, Desjardin, Soytong and K. D. Hyde all have tiny basidiomata (pileus 5 mm in diameter or less) that are similar to M. pseudodelicatula. These species can be distinguished as follows: basidiospores of M. alba are larger, up to 5.8–6.6 × 3.3–3.6 μm (Heinemann and Flower, 1983); M. albella has narrowly utriform to utriform cheilocystidia, some of which are slightly subcapitate (He et al., 2020); cheilocystidia of M. albosericea are smaller (18–30 × 6.0–11 μm) and clavate to ventricose-capitate or subcapitate, without obviously elongated neck (Zhao et al., 2010); M. minor has forked cheilocystidia (this paper); M. pulverulenta has pleurocystidia (Heinemann and Leelavathy, 1991); M. pusillissima has smaller basidiomata (1.0–3.0 mm) and possesses broadly ventricose-capitate cheilocystidia without an obviously elongated neck (Zhao et al., 2010).

Micropsalliota cf. Roseipes Heinem., Bull. Jard. Bot. natn. Belg. 50(1-2): 65 (1980) (Figures 2H, 6, 10D)

Basidiomata stout (IG = 15–38). Pileus 6.0–10 mm in diameter, dirty white (1A1) to pink (11A5–11A6), expanding to plane, plane with aged, covered with dull red (11B4–11B5) to violet-red (11E7–11E8) squamules. Context less than 0.5 mm thick. Lamellae 0.5–0.1 mm broad, free, subdistant, with 2–3 series of lamellulae, white becoming light brown (6C6–6D6) as mature. Stipe 8.5–11.5 × 0.5–1.0 mm, cylindrical, dirty white (1A1) with some pinkish (11A5–11B5) tone, surface with white (1A1) fibrils. Annulus single, membranous, superior, white (1A1), easily fall off.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Micropsalliota cf. roseipes. (A) Basidiospores; (B) basidia; (C) cheilocystidia; (D) pileipellis hyphae. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Basidiospores 5.5–7.0 × 3.0–4.0 μm, av. = 6.2 × 3.6 μm, Q = 1.60–1.90 (2.00), elongated, rarely ovoid in face view, amygdaliform in profile view, light brown, wall 0.2–0.3 μm thick, apically thickened endosporium indistinct, without germ pore, inamyloid. Basidia 15.5–22.5 × 4.5–6.0 μm, clavate, hyaline, 4-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia 19–29 (34) × 6.5–9.0 (9.5) μm, utriform with obtuse, subcapitate or capitate apex, 5.0–7.5 μm in diameter. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae (6.5) 8.0–18 (22) μm in diameter, constricted at the septa on some hyphae, with pink membranous pigment, or dark brown granular-incrusted in cellular vacuoles which can dissolve in 5% KOH (vacuolar pigment) in some hyphae.

Habit and habitat: Scattered on red soil in mixed forests.

Specimen examined: CHINA. Fujian Province, Wuyishan National Park, 20 June 2021, Jun-Qing Yan and Cheng-Feng Nie, HFJAU2494.

Notes: Chinese material closely matches the description of the type of M. roseipes, only differs in having narrower basidiospores, 3.0–4.0 μm rather than 4.0–4.8 μm (Heinemann, 1980). Micropsalliota roseipes is similar to M. cardinalis Heinem., M. rufosquarrosa and M. wuyishanensis, and groups together with M. rufosquarrosa in the phylogenetic tree; however, M. cardinalis has narrowly utriform cheilocystidia (Heinemann, 1989), M. rufosquarrosa has a white stipe and cheilocystidia covered by light brown deposition, and M. wuyishanensis has hyphoid and frequently forked cheilocystidia (this paper).

Micropsalliota rufosquarrosa J. Q. Yan sp. nov.

MycoBank: 842896

Etymology: Referring to its dull red squarrose pileus.

Diagnosis: Differs from M. gracilis in having smaller basidiomata and smaller cheilocystidia covered by an obvious brown deposition. (Figures 2IK, 7, 10E)

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Micropsalliota rufosquarrosa. (A) Basidiospores; (B) basidia; (C) cheilocystidia; (D) pileipellis hyphae. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Basidiomata stout (IG = 9.0–33). Pileus 6.0–12 mm in diameter, white to dirty white (1A1–1B1), convex, expanding to plane, surface dry, covered with red (11B7) to brownish violet (11C7–11D7) squarrose. Context less than 0.5 mm thick. Lamellae 0.3–1.5 mm broad, free, subdistant, with 2 series of lamellulae, white becoming light brown (7D5–7D6) as mature. Stipe 18–38 × 0.5–1.5 mm, cylindrical, white (1A1), surface with white (1A1) fibrils. Annulus single, membranous, superior, white, with a reddish margin, easily fall off.

Basidiospores 5.5–6.5 (7.0) × 3.0–3.5 (4.0) μm, av. = 6.1 × 3.3 μm, Q = (1.60) 1.65–2.00 (2.25), elongated in face view, amygdaliform in profile view, light brown, wall 0.3–0.4 μm thick, most basidiospore with an apically thickened endosporium, without germ pore, inamyloid. Basidia 12.5–16.5 × 5.5–7.0 (7.5) μm, clavate, hyaline, 4- or 2-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia 14–26 × 6.0–10 μm, hyaline, utriform, apex broadly obtuse or capitate, 4.0–6.5 μm in diameter, covered by light brown deposition. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae 4.5–14 (17) μm in diameter, constricted at the septa on some hyphae, with dark brown granular-incrusted in cellular vacuoles that dissolves in alkaline solution (vacuolar pigment).

Habit and habitat: Scattered on ground in mixed forests.

Specimens examined: CHINA. Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Agricultural University, 20 May 2019, Jun-Qing Yan, HFJAU1208; 26 May 2019, Jun-Qing Yan, HFJAU1236, holotype.

Notes: Few species in the genus match the combination of small basidiomata, a pileus covered with dull red scurfy scales or fibrils, and small cheilocystidia covered by light brown deposition that characterizes M. rufosquarrosa. Some species have small basidiomata and a colored pileus but can be separated as follows: M. allantoidea has grayish brown scaly pileus, utriform, lageniform, or tiibiform capitate or subcapitate cheilocystidia (Zhao et al., 2010); M. atropurpurea Heinem., M. cymbispora Heinem. and Little Flower, and M. pseudovolvulata have smaller basidiospores averaging less than 5.5 μm long (Heinemann and Flower, 1983; Heinemann, 1988; Zhao et al., 2010); M. cardinalis and M. purpureobrunneola have purple to brownish purple scales and different cheilocystidia (Heinemann, 1989; He et al., 2020); M. endophaea Heinem., M. megaspora, and M. roseipes have larger basidiospores that are longer than 6.5 μm on average (Heinemann, 1988; Zhao et al., 2010); M. malabarensis Heinem. and Little Flower and M. subalpina Guzm.-Dáv. and Heinem. have longer cheilocystidia, up to 60 μm (Heinemann and Flower, 1983; Guzmán-Dávalos and Heinemann, 1994); M. pruinosa Heinem. has grayish brown scaly pileus, and ellipsoid spores in face view (Heinemann, 1989).

Micropsalliota tenuipes J. Q. Yan sp. nov.

MycoBank: 842897

Etymology: Referring to its slender stipe.

Diagnosis: Differs from M. arginea in having bigger basidiospores (5.3–6.2 × 3.0–3.5 μm). (Figures 2L, 8, 10F)

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Micropsalliota tenuipes. (A) Basidiospores; (B) basidia; (C) cheilocystidia; (D) pileipellis hyphae. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Basidiomata slender (IG = 41–131). Pileus 6.0–12 mm in diameter, dirty white (2A1), brownish orange (6C4–6C5) with age, applanate to plane, surface dry, smooth. Context less than 0.5 mm thick. Lamellae 0.3–0.5 mm broad, free, subdistant, with 2–3 series of lamellulae, dirty white becoming light orange (6A4) to light brown (6C5–6D6) as mature. Stipe 13–23 × 0.3–0.5 mm, cylindrical, slender, hollow, white with yellowish gray (4B2) tinges, surface with white (1A1) fibrils. Annulus single, membranous, light brown (6C5–6D6), persistent, superior to median.

Basidiospores (5.0) 5.3–6.2 (6.5) × 3.0–3.5 μm, av. = 5.8 × 3.3 μm, Q = (1.56) 1.61–1.91 (2.07), elongated or few ellipsoid in face view, amygdaliform in profile view, light brown, wall 0.3–0.5 μm thick, with or without an apically thickened endosporium, without germ pore, inamyloid. Basidia 9.5–12 × 6.0–7.0 μm, clavate, hyaline, 4- or 2-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia 14–26 × (6.0) 8.0–11.5 (12.5) μm, hyaline, claviform or widely utriform, apex broadly obtuse, rare subcapitate, covered by hyaline deposition that dissolves in 5% KOH. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae 6.0–15 μm in diameter, some constricted at the septa on some hyphae, with hyaline, high refractive inclusions that dissolves in 5% KOH.

Habit and habitat: Gregarious on ground in forest.

Specimens examined: CHINA. Fujian Province, Sanming Castanopsis fargesii Provincial Nature Reserve, 18 Jun 2020, Jun-Qing Yan, Hui Zeng, Sheng-Nan Wang, HFJAU1536, holotype; Wuyishan National Park, 12 Jun 2021, Jun-Qing Yan, HFJAU3178.

Notes: Micropsalliota tenuipes is characterized by its slender stipe compared to the size of the pileus (6.0–12 mm). Micropsalliota arginea, M. cinnamomeopallida, M. plumeria, and M. pseudoarginea resemble M. tenuipes but have smaller basidiospores (< 5.5 μm long) (Pegler and Rayner, 1969; Heinemann, 1980, 1988; Heinemann and Leelavathy, 1991; Zhao et al., 2010). In the phylogenetic tree, M. tenuipes groups together with M. albella, but the latter has smaller basidiomata (a pileus 2.0–5.0 mm in diameter) and basidiospores shorter than 5.5 μm (He et al., 2020).

Micropsalliota wuyishanensis J. Q. Yan sp. nov.

MycoBank: 842898

Etymology: Referring to its type locality (Wuyishan National Park).

Diagnosis: Differs from M. cardinalis by its stipe covered with red fibrils and by its hyphoid, often forked, cheilocystidia. (Figures 2M, 9, 10G)

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Micropsalliota wuyishanensis. (A) Basidiospores; (B) basidia; (C) cheilocystidia; (D) pileipellis hyphae. Scale bars: 10 μm.

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. Microscopic structures. (A) Micropsalliota minor: (A1) basidiospores, (A2) pileipellis hyphae, (A3–5) marginal cell of gills and cheilocystidia; (B) M. ovalispora: (B1) basidiospores, (B2) pileipellis hyphae, (B3) marginal cell of gills and cheilocystidia; (C) M. pseudodelicatula: (C1) basidiospores, (C2) pileipellis hyphae, (C3) marginal cell of gills and cheilocystidia; (D) M. cf. roseipes: (D1) basidiospores, (D2) pileipellis hyphae, (D3) marginal cell of gills and cheilocystidia; (E) M. rufosquarrosa: (E1) basidiospores, (E2) pileipellis hyphae, (E3–5) marginal cell of gills and cheilocystidia; (F) M. tenuipes: (F1) basidiospores, (F2) pileipellis hyphae, (F3) marginal cell of gills and cheilocystidia; (G) M. wuyishanensis: (G1) basidiospores, (G2) pileipellis hyphae, (G3) marginal cell of gills and cheilocystidia. Scale bars = 20 μm. Structures of (B2–G2) were observed in water. Other structures were observed 5% KOH, Congo red was used as a stain when necessary.

Basidiomata slender to stout (IG = 28–43). Pileus 6.0–10 mm in diameter, red (10A6–10B7), campanulate, surface dry, covered with deep red (10C7–10C8) fibrils, margin appendiculate, with white or pinkish remains of the veil. Context less than 0.5 mm thick. Lamellae 0.5–1.0 mm broad, free, moderately distant, with 3 series of lamellulae, white (1A1) becoming light brown (7D5–7D6) as mature. Stipe 18–25 × 1.0–1.5 mm, cylindrical, uniform, white (1A1), surface with pastel red to dull red (10A4–10B4) fibrils. Annulus single, membranous, white (1A1), superior, fall off when young.

Basidiospores (5.0) 5.5–6.0 (6.5) × 3.0–3.5 (4.0) μm, av. = 5.8 × 3.4 μm, Q = 1.60–1.80 (1.90), elongated in face view, amygdaliform in profile view, light brown, without germ pore, inamyloid, thick-walled, with a thickened apical endosporium. Basidia (13) 14–18.5 (20) × (5.0) 6.0–7.0 (7.5) μm, clavate, hyaline, 4-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia 33–60 (72) × 3.5–6.0 (6.5) μm, hyaline, hyphoid, tortuous or submoniliform, often branched or forked, apex obtuse or subcapitate, rare capitate. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae (4.5) 6.5–10 (11) μm in diameter, with pink membranous pigment.

Habit and habitat: Scattered on soil in broad-leaved forests.

Specimens examined: CHINA. Fujian Province, Wuyishan National Park, Jun-Qing Yan, Ya-Ping Hu and Hui Ding, 10 Aug 2021, HFJAU3048, holotype.

Notes: Among known species of Micropsalliota, only M. cardinalis and M. roseipes resemble M. wuyishanensis in having a red pileus 5.0–10 mm in diameter. These two species can be distinguished from the latter as follows: M. cardinalis has capitate cheilocystidia that are less than 35 μm long (Heinemann, 1989), and M. roseipes has longer basidiospores (6.2–7.4 μm) (Heinemann, 1980). In the phylogenetic tree, M. wuyishanensis formed a distinct lineage, but the phylogenetic position and relationships with other species are still unclear.

Key to Micropsalliota species of China

1a. Pileus white to dirty white……………………………..2

1b. Pileus colored, e.g., brown, red or violet………………10

2a. Basidiospores shorter than 5.5 μm……………………..3

2b. Basidiospores longer than 5.5 μm………….…………..6

3a. Cheilocystidia bifid with two toe-like subcapitate lobes…………………….……………………M. bifida

3b. Not as above……………………………….…………4

4a. Basidiospores ovoid in face view, amygdaliform in profile view………………………….….…….….M. ovalispora

4b. Not as above…………………….…….………………5

5a. Pileus < 5 mm in diameter, cheilocystidia tibiiform or lageniform, apex capitate……………M. pseudodelicatula

5b. Pileus >5 mm in diameter, cheilocystidia non-capitate……….….………………M. pseudoarginea

6a. Pileus mainly < 10 mm in diameter…….….……………7

7a. Cheilocystidia two types, tibiiform or forked with capitate or subacute apex………………………………M. minor

7b. Not as above………….…….…….……………………8

8a. Cheilocystidia utriform, with broadly obtuse apex…….…….…….………………………M. tenuipes

8b. Cheilocystidia capitate, with a sinuous or straight neck………………………………………M. delicatula

9a. Pileipellis hyphae with vacuolar pigments….….M. subalba

9b. Pileipellis hyphae hyaline but with pigment incrusted……….…………………M. dentatomarginata

10a. Pleurocystidia present…….….…………M. digitatocystis

10b. Pleurocystidia absent…………………………………11

11a. Pileus mainly < 10 mm in diameter……………………12

11b. Pileus larger than 10 mm in diameter……………….…15

12a. Pileus brown to dark brown…….….………M. megaspora

12b. Pileus pink, red to violet-red…………………….……13

13a. Cheilocystidia hyphoid, often forked, up to 60 μm long………………….….……………M. wuyishanensis

13b. Not as above…………………………………………14

14a. Stipe dirty white with pink tone, cheilocystidia without deposit……………………….…….….…M. cf. roseipes

14b. Stipe white, cheilocystidia covered by light brown deposit………………………………..M. rufosquarrosa

15a. Pileus 20–80 mm in diameter…………………………16

15b. Pileus < 20 mm in diameter…………………………...18

16a. Basidiospores 4.5–6 μm long………..M. pseudoglobocystis

16b. Basidiospores longer than 6 μm………………………17

17a. Conext stains red when bruised or cut………………………………………………………..M. furfuracea

17b. Conext stains yellow to reddish-brown…………………………………………………………..M. globocystis

18a. Veil cortinate………………………………M. cortinata

18b. Veil membranous……………………………………19

19a. Basidiomes violet-red…………M. lateritia var. vinaceipes

19b. Basidiomes brown………………………M. arginophaea

Discussions

The results of our phylogenetic analysis are to some extent consistent with previous studies based on ITS and LSU sequences (Zhao et al., 2010; He et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Al-Kharousi et al., 2022), but we were able to resolve more subclades, and the support values for some clades and subclades were higher. Major clades were strongly to weakly supported, but were difficult to morphologically characterize. Many comprised a morphologically heterogeneous assemblage of species, with only a few subclades that were synapomorphies (see below).

In clade A, species in /megaspora share fibrillose to floccose, brown to dark brown squamules, an IG < 50, and basidiospores up to 7.5 μm long (Heinemann, 1980; Zhao et al., 2010). Among /pleurocystidiata, M. pleurocystidiata and M. xanthorubescens share fibrillose to floccose, brown to dark brown squamules, presence of pleurocystidia, basidiospores 5.0–7.0 μm long, and an IG < 30 (Heinemann, 1980; Heinemann and Flower, 1983; Zhao et al., 2010).

In Clade B, species in /rufosquarrosa share red squamules, basidiospores 5.5–7.0 μm long, and an IG < 30 (Heinemann, 1980). Species in /bifida, except for M. arginophaea Heinem. and M. gracilis Heinem., have white and squamulose pileus, but there are no obvious synapomorphies in regard to the basidiospore size, IG value, or color change upon bruising (Heinemann and Flower, 1983; Zhao et al., 2010; He et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021). Species in /allantoidea share small basidiomata, a pileus less than 10 mm in diameter, capitate cheilocystidia with an elongated neck, and an IG = 30–60 (Zhao et al., 2010); species in /arginea are not obviously morphologically synapomorphies except in having spores that are ellipsoid to amygdaliform, which is true for most species of Micropsalliota (Pegler and Rayner, 1969; Zhao et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2016; Parra et al., 2016).

Species in Clade D share fibrillose or squamulose pileus and mainly basidiospores longer than 6 μm, but this common feature also applies to Clades A, E, and a few species in area F. Therefore, this feature is not representative. In addition, except for M. megarubescens, most of the species in this clade resemble M. globocystis in their macroscopic features: they have brown to red-brown squamules, basidiospores mainly shorter than 7.5 μm, and an IG < 30 (Zhao et al., 2010; Wei et al., 2015; He et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021).

Clade C is characterized by the presence of a cortinoid annulus (Heinemann, 1980; Zhao et al., 2010). Clade E share moderately sized basidiomes (IG = 40–80) with a white, silky pileus that stains reddish brown (Zhao et al., 2010). Although area F was undetermined, species in this area, except for M. ventricocystidiata, share red to red-brown squamules, an IG < 40, basidiospores mainly shorter than 6 μm, and more or less forked cheilocystidia (Zhao et al., 2010; Al-Kharousi et al., 2022).

Based on the study of Al-Kharousi et al. (2022), species of Micropsalliota recovered in two groups: M-I and M-II. Clade M-I shares fibrillose/squamulose pileus and the average length of basidiospores is ≥ 6.0 μm, which contains the majority of species in the Clade A, C, D, E, and area F, but M. wuyishanensis does not conform to this characteristic combination (this paper). Clade M-II shares more or less glabrous pileus and spores are < 6.0 μm in length by phylogenetic analyses, which contains the majority of species in the /bifida and /allantoidea, but M. subalba Heinem. and Little Flower does not conform to this characteristic combination (this paper).

The species diversity of this genus may be much richer than we previously thought. As more species are discovered, we believe that more well-supported clades will appear in the phylogenetic tree and synapomorphies will be better resolved. Beyond that, some seemingly known species deserve further study: the three sequences of M. subarginea from Thailand do not form a distinct lineage and may thus represent three separate species; and the sequences of M. globocystis from China and Thailand form five clades and may represent five different species. Some names may be synonyms: although phylogenetic placement suggests that M. pleurocystidiata and M. xanthorubescens are conspecific, taking into account that the type specimens have not been sequenced, we tentatively maintain them as independent species in accordance with the treatment of Zhao et al. (2010); M. cornuta is thus very likely a synonym of A. trisulphuratus; however, we have not examined the type specimen of A. trisulphuratus and cannot draw definite conclusions.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Author contributions

J-QY and S-NW designed the research and contributed to data analysis and interpretation. Z-HZ, Y-PH, B-RK, and HZ participated in the collection of specimens. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31960008), the Project of FAAS (XTCXGC2021007), Biodiversity Investigation, Observation and Assessment Program (2019–2023) of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China (2110404), Project of Biological Resources Survey in Wuyishan National Park (HXQT2020120701), and Project of Biodiversity Conservation in Lishui, Zhejiang Province (HXYJCP2021110648).

Acknowledgments

We thank the reviewers for their corrections and suggestions to improve our work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1011794/full#supplementary-material

References

Al-Kharousi, M., Hussain, S., Al-Muharabi, M. A., Al-Shabibi, Z., Al-Balushi, A. H., Al-Yahya'ei, M. N., et al. (2022). Notes on the genus Micropsalliota (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) and the description of a new species from Southern Oman. Phytotaxa 543, 113–126. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.543.2.2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bas, C. (1969). Morphology and subdivision of Amanita and a monograph of its section Lepidella. Persoonia 5, 285–573.

Google Scholar

Bau, T., and Yan, J.-Q. (2021). A new genus and four new species in the /Psathyrella s.l. clade from China. MycoKeys 80, 115–131. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.80.65123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Hyde, K. D., Bahkali, A. H., and Zhao, R. L. (2016). Micropsalliota brunneosquamata, a new species from Thailand. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 43, 689–694.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Chen, Y. L., Pei, N. C., Zhang, L. P., Deng, W. Q., Wu, F., and Liu, M. (2019). Three new records of Micropsalliota from China. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis 41, 708–714. doi: 10.13836/j.jjau.2019082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crous, P., Osieck, E., Jurjevi, Ž., Boers, J., Van Iperen, A., Starink-Willemse, M., et al. (2021). Fungal planet description sheets: 1284–1382. Persoonia Mol. Phyl. Evol. Fungi 47, 178–374. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.06

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ge, Y. P., Liu, Z. W., Zeng, H., Cheng, X. H., and Na, Q. (2021). Updated description of Atheniella (Mycenaceae, Agaricales), including three new species with brightly coloured pilei from Yunnan Province, southwest China. MycoKeys 81, 139–164. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.81.67773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guzmán-Dávalos, L. (1992). First record of the genus Micropsalliota (Basidiomycotina, Agaricaceae) in Mexico. Mycotaxon 43, 199–205.

Google Scholar

Guzmán-Dávalos, L., and Heinemann, P. (1994). Micropsalliota subalpina nov. sp. (Agaricaceae) from Mexico. Bull. Jardin Bot. Natl. Belg. 63, 195–199. doi: 10.2307/3668476

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, M. Q., Hyde, K. D., Cheewangkoon, R., and Zhao, R. L. (2020). Two new species of Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae/Agaricales) from Thailand. Phytotaxa 453, 137–144. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.453.2.5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P. (1956). Champignons récoltés au Congo Belge par Madame M. Goossens-Fontana II. Agaricus Fries ss. Bull. Jardin Bot. Natl. Belg. 26, 1–127. doi: 10.2307/3667096

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P. (1977). The genus Micropsalliota. Kew Bull. 31, 581–583. doi: 10.2307/4119406

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P. (1980). Les genres Agaricus et Micropsalliota en Malaisie et en Indonésie. Bull. Jardin Bot. Natl. Belg. 50, 3–68. doi: 10.2307/3667774

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P. (1983). Clé de détermination de Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae) et description de deux espèces nouvelles. Bull. Jardin Bot. Natl. Belg. 53, 85–95. doi: 10.2307/3668030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P. (1988). Novitates generis Micropsalliotae (Agaricaceae). Bull. Jardin Bot. Natl. Belg. 58, 540–543. doi: 10.2307/3668305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P. (1989). Le genre Micropsalliota en Amérique tropicale et subtropicale. Bull. Jardin Bot. Natl. Belg. 59, 459–466. doi: 10.2307/3668360

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P., and Flower, S. L. (1983). Micropsalliota de Kerala (Inde). Bull. Jardin Bot. Natl. Belg. 53, 75–84. doi: 10.2307/3668029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heinemann, P., and Leelavathy, K. M. (1991). The genus Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae) in Kerala State, India. Mycol. Res. 95, 341–346. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81245-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Höhnel, F. X. R. (1914). Fragmente zur Mykologie XVI (XVI. Mitteilung, Nr. 813 bis 875). Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Math.-naturw. Klasse Abt. I 123, 49–155.

Google Scholar

Hopple, J. J., and Vilgalys, R. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships in the mushroom genus Coprinus and dark-spored allies based on sequence data from the nuclear gene coding for the large ribosomal subunit RNA: divergent domains, outgroups, and monophyly. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 1–19. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Horak, E. (2005). Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze in Europa: Bestimmungsschlüssel für Polyporales (pp), Boletales, Agaricales, Russulales. Munich: Elsevier.

Google Scholar

Katoh, K., Rozewicki, J., and Yamada, K. D. (2019). MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinformat. 20, 1160–1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kornerup, A., and Wanscher, J. H. K. (1978). The Methuen Handbook of Colour. 3rd Edn. London: Eyre Methuen Ltd. Reprint.

Google Scholar

Lanfear, R., Frandsen, P. B., Wright, A. M., Senfeld, T., and Calcott, B. (2017). PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 772–773. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw260

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J. X., He, M. Q., and Zhao, R. L. (2021). Three new species of Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae, Agaricales) from China. Phytotaxa 491, 167–176. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.491.2.6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Li, T. H., Yang, Z. L., Bau, T., and Dai, Y. C. (2015). Altas of Chinese Macrofungal Resources. Henan: Central Plains Farmers Publishing House, China.

Google Scholar

Liu, W., Chen, Y. L., Zhang, L. P., and Lliang, J. F. (2021). Two new records of the genus Micropsalliota from China. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 43, 703–709. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2022.04.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matheny, P. B. (2005). Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 35, 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Na, Q., Liu, Z. W., Zeng, H., Cheng, X. H., and Ge, Y. P. (2022). Crepidotus yuanchui sp. nov. and C. caspari found in subalpine areas of China. Mycoscience 63, 1–11. doi: 10.47371/mycosci.2021.10.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A., and Minh, B. Q. (2014). IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parra, L. A., Tan, Y., Xu, M. L., Zhou, J. L., Wang, B., and Zhao, R. L. (2016). A reexamination of Allopsalliota indicates synonymy with Micropsalliota (Agariceae, Agaricaceae, Agaricales, basidiomycota). Mycoscience 57, 303–310. doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2016.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pegler, D. N., and Rayner, R. W. (1969). A contribution to the agaric flora of Kenya. Kew Bull. 23, 347–412. doi: 10.2307/4117177

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Van Der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., et al. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singer, R. (1975). The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy. Vaduz: J. Cramer.

Google Scholar

Sun, J. Y., Wang, Y. S., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yi, Z. C., Yan, J. Q., et al. (2020). Two new records of Micropsalliota from Jiangxi Province. J. Northeast For. Univ. 48, 120–123.

Google Scholar

Wang, F. J., Zhou, X. Y., and Gan, L. (2017). Micropsalliota lateritia, a new record of Micropsalliota from Hubei Province in China. J. Central China Normal Univ. 51, 651–654. doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2017.05.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. N., Fan, Y. G., and Yan, J. Q. (2022). Iugisporipsathyra reticulopilea gen. et sp. nov. (Agaricales, Psathyrellaceae) from tropical China produces unique ridge-ornamented spores with an obvious suprahilar plage. MycoKeys 90, 147–162. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.90.85690

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, L., Li, Y. H., Hyde, K. D., and Zhao, R. L. (2015). Micropsalliota pseudoglobocystis, a new species from China. Mycotaxon 130, 555–561. doi: 10.5248/130.555

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B., Taylor, J. W., Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., et al. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for phylogenetics. San Diego: Academic Press.

Google Scholar

Yu, W. J., Chang, C., Qin, L. W., Zeng, N. K., Wang, S. X., and Fan, Y. G. (2020). Pseudosperma citrinostipes (Inocybaceae), a new species associated with Keteleeria from southwestern China. Phytotaxa 450, 8–16. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.450.1.2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, R. L., Desjardin, D. E., Soytong, K., Perry, B. A., and Hyde, K. D. (2010). A monograph of Micropsalliota in Northern Thailand based on morphological and molecular data. Fungal Divers. 45, 33–79. doi: 10.1007/s13225-010-0050-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: basidiomycete, biodiversity, East Asia, fungal phylogeny, new taxa, taxonomy

Citation: Yan J-Q, Zeng Z-H, Hu Y-P, Ke B-R, Zeng H and Wang S-N (2022) Taxonomy and multi-gene phylogeny of Micropsalliota (Agaricales, Agaricaceae) with description of six new species from China. Front. Microbiol. 13:1011794. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1011794

Received: 04 August 2022; Accepted: 22 August 2022;
Published: 07 November 2022.

Edited by:

Jing Si, Beijing Forestry University, China

Reviewed by:

Yu-Guang Fan, Hainan Medical University, China
Ming Zhang, Guangdong Academy of Science, China

Copyright © 2022 Yan, Zeng, Hu, Ke, Zeng and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jun-Qing Yan, eWFuanVucWluZzE5OTAmI3gwMDA0MDsxMjYuY29t; Sheng-Nan Wang, d2FuZ3NoZW5nbmFuXzIwMDMmI3gwMDA0MDsxNjMuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.