- 1Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
- 2Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
The joint estuary of Tinto and Odiel rivers (SW Spain) is one of the most degraded and polluted areas in the world and its recovery is mandatory. Legumes and their associated bacteria are recommended sustainable tools to fight against soils degradation and loss of fertility due to their known positive impacts on soils. The aim of this work was to isolate and characterize plant growth promoting nodule endophytes (PGPNE) from inside nodules of Medicago spp. naturally growing in the estuary of the Tinto and Odiel Rivers and evaluate their ability to promote legume adaptation in degraded soils. The best rhizobia and non-rhizobia among 33 endophytes were selected based on their plant growth promoting properties and bacterial enzymatic activities. These strains, identified as Pseudomonas sp. N4, Pseudomonas sp. N8, Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12, were used for in vitro studies using Medicago sativa plants. The effects of individual or combined inoculation on seed germination, plant growth and nodulation were studied, both on plates and pots containing nutrient-poor soils and moderately contaminated with metals/loids from the estuary. In general, inoculation with combinations of rhizobia and Pseudomonas increased plant biomass (up to 1.5-fold) and nodules number (up to 2-fold) compared to single inoculation with rhizobia, ameliorating the physiological state of the plants and helping to regulate plant stress mechanisms. The greatest benefits were observed in plants inoculated with the consortium containing the four strains. In addition, combined inoculation with Ensifer and Pseudomonas increased As and metals accumulation in plant roots, without significant differences in shoot metal accumulation. These results suggest that PGPNE are useful biotools to promote legume growth and phytostabilization potential in nutrient-poor and/or metals contaminated estuarine soils.
Introduction
Industrial and mining activity releases toxic metal/loids into the environment, such as As, Cd, Cu, and Pb, all of them very harmful to human health and most living beings (FAO and ITPS, 2015). In turn this has caused the degradation of soils, either by the modification of pH or by originating a decrease in the number of arable lands causing a problem at social, economic, and environmental levels (Singh et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2013). Heavy metals are dangerous because they are not degradable either chemically or biologically, being able to remain in the environment for hundreds or thousands of years (Herrera Marcano, 2011). These metals have also been repressing the enzymatic activity of the soils, causing a decrease in the growth and respiration of the populations of microorganisms, thus altering the diversity present in the rhizosphere (Abdu et al., 2017; Aponte et al., 2020). Marshes of river estuaries are particularly sensitive to heavy metals contamination by metals deposition. A good example is the combined estuary of Tinto and Odiel rivers (Huelva, SW Spain), known as one of the most contaminated regions in the world (Hudson-Edwards et al., 1999). Levels of toxic metal/loids as high as 125 ppm of As, 890 ppm of Cu, 275 ppm of Pb or 1,500 ppm of Zn in the Odiel river marshes, and 2 to 3-fold these levels in the Tinto River marshes, have been reported in the last decade (Mesa et al., 2015a; Navarro-Torre et al., 2017). These levels exceed those allowed by regional and national legislation in natural parks, agricultural and industrial soils (Junta de Andalucía and Consejeria de Medio Ambiente, 1999).
One solution to this great environmental problem is the implantation of pioneering crops able to regenerate the soil and improve its yield, respecting the environment. This kind of strategies should include the use of leguminous plants (belonging to the Fabaceae family), due to their great benefits. First, legumes are an important product in the food industry both for human and animal consumption worldwide, since they are very rich in protein, fiber, vitamins, and minerals and also has a low cost, being highly consumed in underdeveloped countries (Ferreira et al., 2021). Second, legumes play a very important role in agriculture as cover crops, since they improve soil fertility increasing crops yield, help the constant movement of soil nutrients and release matter into the soil (Stagnari et al., 2017; Ferreira et al., 2021). Third, legumes are good candidates to adapt to degraded soils affected by biotic and abiotic factors, particularly these plants play an important role in the regeneration of soils degraded by heavy metals due to their ability to accumulate metals in the roots without affecting plant growth (Mesa et al., 2015b; Flores-Duarte et al., 2022a).
Legumes are capable of fixing atmospheric nitrogen through symbiosis with many genera of soil nitrogen-fixing bacteria, called rhizobia, which penetrate the roots through the root hairs, forming nodules in which nitrogen fixation takes place (Poole et al., 2018). But nodules are not only occupied by rhizobia, within the legume nodules there are another great variety of bacteria called non-rhizobial nodule-associated bacteria (NAB; Rajendran et al., 2012), non-rhizobial endophytes (NRE; De Meyer et al., 2015), or just nodule endophytes (Velázquez et al., 2013). These bacteria do not induce nodule formation but can colonize nodules accompanying rhizobia forming a beneficial association and enhancing nodulation and plant growth. Within this group, bacteria of the genera, Acinetobacter, Agrobacterium, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Pseudomonas and Variovorax, among others, have been found (Shiraishi et al., 2010; Martínez-Hidalgo and Hirsch, 2017; Bessadok et al., 2020). These nodule endophytes usually behave as plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB).
Soil health and fertility are directly influenced by beneficial plant-microbe relationships that determine soil biodiversity (Vishwakarma et al., 2020). Plant-PGPB interactions have shown to provide benefits in plant growth and development by facilitating the acquisition of nutrients (Fasusi et al., 2021) and producing phytohormones related with plant and root lenth growth, and the formation of root hairs and lateral roots, such as cytokinin, gibberellins, abscisic acid, and IAA (Raza et al., 2019). Through atmospheric nitrogen fixation (Roy et al., 2020), phosphate mobilization/solubilization (Etesami et al., 2021) and siderophores production (Lurthy et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2021) bacteria provide N, P, Fe, and Zn to plants. PGPB also play a determinant role in plant adaptation and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress (Chaudhary et al., 2022). For example, bacteria with ACC-deaminase activity are able to break the ethylene precursor ACC, altering plant stress perception (Penrose and Glick, 2003; Chandwani and Amaresan, 2022).
Microorganisms have an important role in pollutant detoxification and heavy metal plant stress resistance (Caracciolo and Terenzi, 2021). Soil microorganisms have developed different resistance mechanisms, such as metal biosorption, bioaccumulation, modification of metal chemical state (methylation) or production of chelating compounds, particularly siderophores and biosurfactans, that cause a lowering in metal availability for plants (Verma and Kuila, 2019), then diminishing plant metal content (Caracciolo and Terenzi, 2021). PGPB are directly involved in metal detoxification through the production of secondary metabolites, such as siderophores, ACC or IAA (Caracciolo and Terenzi, 2021). Particularly in legumes, nitrogen-fixing bacteria and endophytes inside nodules have probed to reduce metal translocation to aerial parts and increase plant nitrogen content and growth in metal contaminated soils (Navarro-Torre et al., 2020; Flores-Duarte et al., 2022b).
In a recent work, a consortium of PGPB, including Pseudomonas, Chryseobacterium and Priestia genera, showed their ability to promote Medicago sativa growth and adaptation in poor-nutrient soils (Flores-Duarte et al., 2022b). These bacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere of different legumes growing in estuarine soils with low levels of minerals and organic matter. It is well accepted that endophytes maintain a much closer relationship with the plant and have lower competition with soil microorganisms than rizospheric bacteria (Adeleke and Babalola, 2021; Dwibedi et al., 2022). The present work is aimed to determine whether a consortium of endophytes isolated from nodules could enhance legume growth in degraded soils more efficiently than rhizosphere bacteria, introducing soil metal contamination as additional stress.
The objectives that arise in this work are the following: (i) isolation and characterization of rhizobia and endophytes from nodules of Medicago spp. naturally growing in the Odiel river estuary (Huelva, Spain); (ii) selection of rhizobia and nodule endophytes based on their properties, enzymatic activities and ability to tolerate metal/loids; (iii) determine the ability of the selected bacteria to promote M. sativa growth, nodulation and metal accumulation in Odiel marshes soils under greenhouse conditions.
Materials and methods
Collection of samples and soil characterization
Nodulated wild plants of Medicago spp. were collected from high marshes of the Odiel river estuary (Huelva, Spain; 37°150 N, 6°580 W; SW Spain) in February 2020. Soil samples (15–20 cm deep) were collected using a shovel, gloves and plastic bags. The samples were immediately transported to the laboratory and stored at 4°C. Three homogeneous soil samples were deposited in sterile bottles for chemical soil analysis, as described by Mateos-Naranjo et al. (2015). The soil texture (percentage of sand, silt, and clay) was determined using the Bouyoucos hydrometer method (Bouyoucos, 1936). Electrical conductivity was measured with a Crison-522 conductivity meter (Spain) and pH and redox potential with a Crison pH/mVp-506 portable meter (Spain). The concentration of nutrients in the soil was measured by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES; ARLFisons3410, Thermo Scientific, Walthman, MA, United States). The amount of organic matter was determined by the method of Walkley and Black (1934). Results are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties and micronutrients concentrations of soil from high marshes of the Odiel River.
Isolation of endophytic bacteria from nodules of Medicago spp.
Nodules were exscinded from roots with a scalpel, washed with water and placed on tubes. Samples were immersed in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 1 min with manual agitation to disinfect the surface. Then, they were washed again with sterile water and immersed in 3% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 15 min under continuous agitation and finally washed four times with sterile distilled water. Disinfected nodules were deposited in a mortar with 1 ml of sterile 0.9% (w/v) saline solution and grinded. Portions of 100 μl of the resulting mix were to spread and extended with a spatula in Petri dishes with TY medium (tryptone-yeast extract agar) and TSA (tryptone soya agar, Intron Biotechnology, Korea). Plates were incubated for 72 h at 28°C. Controls of nodule surface disinfection and solution sterility were performed. Bacteria were separated based on the different colony morphology and cell morphology was observed by Gram stain using an Olympus CX41 microscope with the 100x objective.
Determination of plant growth promoting properties and enzymatic activities
The ACC deaminase activity was assessed as described by Penrose and Glick (2003) and adapted by Mesa et al. (2015a). Activity was measured by monitoring α-ketobutyric acid at 540 nm in a spectrophotometer (Lambda25; PerkinElmer, Walthmam, MA, United States), and the amount of α-ketobutyric acid was determined using a standard curve with known concentrations. ACC deaminase activity was expressed in μmoles of α-ketobutyrate per mg of protein per hour. To verify nitrogen fixation, strains were plated in nitrogen free broth (NFB; Döebereiner, 1995) for 5 days at 28°C. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production was determined using a colorimetric technique by incubating 3 ml of a liquid culture of TY or TSB supplemented with L-tryptophan (0.1 mg/ml) and incubated at 28°C for 72 h at 200 rpm. Cultures were then centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 rpm and supernatants transferred to glass tubes. The appearance of a pink color after adding 4 ml of Salkowski’s reagent (Gordon and Weber, 1951) indicated that the test was positive. The amount of IAA was calculated by measuring the absorbance at 535 nm in a spectrophotometer (Lambda 25; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Phosphate solubilization was carried out on plates with NBRIP medium (phosphate growth medium from the National Institute of Botanical Research) as described by Nautiyal (1999). The appearance of a transparent halo after 7 days of incubation at 28°C indicated that the bacteria had the capacity to solubilize phosphates. 100 μl of bacterial culture medium was added to each well. The formation of biofilms will be prolonged by checking the adhesion capacity of the bacteria in microplates with 96 wells in TY or liquid TSB at 28°C, incubating for 4 days, after incubation each well was stained with 200 μl of 0.01% crystal violet as described by del Castillo et al. (2012). Siderophores production was determined by the appearance of an orange halo around the well containing 100 μl of bacterial culture in CAS medium (Chromeazurol S), after incubation for 7 days at 28°C (Schwyn and Neilands, 1987). Enzymatic activities were determined on plates incubated at 28°C for 7 days. Pectinase and cellulase activities were examined as described by Elbeltagy et al. (2000). For pectinase activity, strains were plated on ammonium mineral agar (AMA). Plates were revealed with 2% CTAB and positive bacteria showed a halo around. For cellulase activity, strains were plated on solid M9 minimal medium supplemented with yeast extract (0.2%) and carboxymethylcellulose (1%). Plates were developed by covering the plate with 1 mg/ml Congo Red solution for 15 min and decolorizing with 1 M NaCl for 15 min. The appearance of a clear halo indicated positive result. Chitinase activity was performed as described by Mesa et al. (2015a). Amylase activity was performed on starch agar plates (Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain) and revealed with 10 ml lugol. The formation of a transparent halo indicated positive result. Lipase and protease activities were observed by the presence of halos around the bacteria after incubation in casein agar and Tween 80 mediums, respectively, as described by Prescott (2002). And finally, the DNAse activity was determined by cultures on DNA agar plates revealed with 1 M HCl.
For PGP properties and enzyme activities, positive and negative controls from BIO-181 group collection were used (Supplementary Table 1).
Tolerance to metals/loids
The isolated bacteria were plated in TY and TSA medium with increasing concentrations of As, Cd, Cu and Zn, from 1 M NaAsO2, 1 M CdCl2, 1 M CuSO4, 1 M ZnSO4 stock solutions. Plates were incubated for 24–48 h at 28°C and tolerance expressed as the maximum tolerable concentration (MTC), that is the maximum concentration that allows visible bacterial growth.
Analysis of diversity and identification of isolates
The diversity of the isolated endophytes was analyzed by performing a Box-PCR. Bacterial genomic DNA was isolated using a G-spin™ Genomic DNA Extraction Kit for Bacteria (Intron Biotechnology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) with the instructions determined by the manufacturer. Box-PCR was performed using 1 μl of DNA and Box A1R primer (5′-CTACGGCAAG GCGACGCTGACG-3′) using the Maxime™ PCR PreMix kit (i-Taq™; Intron Biotechnology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) and following the PCR conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 s, annealing at 52°C for 20 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Electrophoresis was performed in a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel and a voltage of 70 V for 2 h. Representative bacteria of each different Box-PCR profile were identified by 16S rRNA gene amplification using 16F27 and 16R1488 primers (Navarro-Torre et al., 2016) and the Maxime™ PCR PreMix kit (i-Taq™; Intron Biotechnology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) following the next PCR conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 s, annealing at 58°C for 10 s, extension at 72°C for 50 s, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Electrophoresis was performed in a 1% (w/v) agarose gel and a voltage of 120 V for 30 min. PCR products were purified with the enzyme ExoSAP IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), following the manufacturer instructions, and sequenced by the StabVida company (Caparica, Portugal). Then, 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared with those deposited in the EzBioCloud database (Yoon et al., 2017) using the Ez-Taxon e service (www.ezbiocloud.net/eztaxon; accessed July 2022). Finally, 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank.
Inoculant design
Selected bacteria were grown together on TY plates to test growth compatibility as described in Navarro-Torre et al. (2016). The inoculants were prepared by cultivating selected strains separately in TSB or TY at 28°C for 24 h and 200 rpm. Afterwards, cultures containing 108 cells mL−1 were transferred to sterile Falcon tubes to be centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min, washing twice with sterile 0.9% (w/v) saline solution, to remove traces of the culture medium (Navarro-Torre et al., 2016). At the end of the washes the cultures were resuspended in a sterile liquid nitrogen deficient buffered nodulation medium (BNM; Ehrhardt et al., 1992), or sterile water for experiments under greenhouse conditions. For co-inoculation and consortium inoculation designs, bacteria were mixed after resuspension. Inoculation conditions were defined as follow: C-: non inoculation; N4: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4; N8: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8; N10: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N10; N12: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N12; N4 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N10; N8 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N10; N4 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N12; N8 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N12; CSN: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4, Pseudomonas sp., N8 Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12.
Labelling of Pseudomonas with fluorescence and microscopy
Pseudomonas strains (Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Pseudomonas sp. N8) were marked with the fluorescent protein mCherry by triparental matting, mixing the donor Escherichia coli DH5α containing the plasmid pMP7604 (Lagendijk et al., 2010), the helper strain E. coli containing pRK600 (Finan et al., 1986) and Pseudomonas strains spontaneously resistant to rifampicin (100 μg/ml) as recipients. 100 μl aliquots of TSB overnight cultures were plated on TSA containing rifampicin (100 μg/ml) and tetracycline (10 μg/ml). Fluorescent Pseudomonas resistant to both antibiotics thus containing the plasmid were selected. M. sativa plants were co-inoculated with the rhizobia (Ensifer sp. N10 or Ensifer sp. N12) and labelled Pseudomonas in square plates (12 × 12 cm), 20 seedlings per condition, as described below. After 28 days, roots and nodules were cut with a sterile scalpel and 0.5 mm cuts observed (Mesa et al., 2015b). Fluorescent bacteria in plant tissues were visualized using a laser scanning spectral confocal optical microscope (Zeiss LSM 7 DUO, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with an objective Plan-Apochromat 20X/0.8 M27, filters of 572–727, and a laser of 561 nm (5.3%). Images were processed with ZEN2011 software (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
Medicago sativa seeds germination and nodulation on plates
Alfalfa (M. sativa) seeds were surface disinfected following the protocol described by Navarro-Torre et al. (2019) by immersing them for 10 min in 70% (v/v) ethanol, followed by 30 min in sodium hypochlorite at 3% (v/v) under gentle agitation, washing 6 times with sterile distilled water. The next step was to immerse 50 seeds in each inoculant for 1 h and for the non-inoculated control (C-) seeds were immersed for 1 h in 0.9% (w/v) NaCl. Seeds were transferred to plates containing 0.9% (w/v) water-agar (5 repetitions per condition and 10 seeds per plate) or water-agar plates containing a mixture of 7.5 μM As, Cd, Cu, and Zn, prepared from the stock solutions described above (paragraph 2.4), and finally incubated in the dark at 28°C. Germination was observed every 24 h for 7 days in absence of metals and for 21 days in presence of metals.
For in vitro nodulation experiment, pre-germinated seeds were transferred to square plates (12×12 cm) with nitrogen-free BNM-agar medium (Ehrhardt et al., 1992), supplemented with sodium arsenite at a concentration of 30 μM. or in absence of arsenite. NH4NO3 was added to all plates at a concentration of 1 mM. 10 seeds were deposited in each plate and 5 replicates per treatment were performed. The seeds were inoculated or co-inoculated under the conditions described above using the selected bacteria, and non-inoculated seeds were used as controls. The plates were placed in a vertical position, incubated at 22°C with a cycle of 8 h of darkness and 16 h of light (120–130 μE m −2·s−1) in a growth chamber (AGP-700-HR ESP; Radiber, Barcelona, Spain). Plants were harvested after 21 days and nodules from each condition were counted.
Experiments under greenhouse conditions
Soil was collected from the upper marshes of the Odiel River and sterilized in an autoclave at 121°C and 1 atm of overpressure for 30 min. This sterilization was repeated twice. To confirm soil sterilization, 3 samples of 1 g of soil were washed by shaking in 10 ml of sterile water. After decanting for 10 min, three samples of 100 μl of supernatant per tube were plated on TSA and no growth was observed on plates incubated 48 h at 28°C. Plastic pots (11 cm squared pots with 12 cm height) were filled with 1 kg of the previously sterilized soil (3,1, three parts of the soil from the marshes and one part of sterile perlite) and 2 pre-germinated seeds were placed per pot, 8 pots per condition. The experiment lasted 60 days and plants were irrigated with sterile water once a week (50 ml) and weekly inoculated with their respective inoculum (50 ml of cultures). The greenhouse had controlled light and temperature conditions; natural light was supplemented with fluorescent/incandescent lamps to get a photoperiod of 16 h light: 8 h dark; and the temperature was adjusted to 25°C during the day and 15°C during the night. At the end, the length of roots and shoots were measured, the number of nodules and leaves were counted, the diameters of the leaves were determined, and the nitrogen content in the plant was evaluated using an InfrAlyzer 300 (Technicon, Tarrytown, NY, United States), as described by Carrasco et al. (2005). Finally, samples were placed in an oven at 80°C for 48 h to determine the dry weight of both shoots and roots separately.
Determination of photosynthetic parameters and total chlorophyll content
For the determination of gas exchange, leaves were randomly selected from M. sativa plants and measured with an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) LI-6400 (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) equipped with a Li-6,400-02B leaf light chamber. Measurements were made between 9 am and 2 pm under a photosynthetic photon flux density of 1,500 μmol m−2 s−1, a vapor pressure deficit of 2–3 kPa, at a temperature of approximately 25°C and an environment of CO2 concentration of 400 μmol·mol−1 air. Gas exchange stabilization (120 s) was equilibrated, and measurements were recorded to determine the net photosynthetic rate (AN). In addition, a fluorometric analysis was performed to study the energy use efficiency of photosystem II (PSII). The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) and the quantum efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) were determined using a saturation pulse method described in Genty et al. (1989). Selected leaves were light- and dark-adapted for 30 min, followed by a saturated actinic light pulse of 10,000 μmol m−2 s−1 for 0.8 s at noon (1700 μmol photons m−2 s−1) using a FMS-2 modulated fluorimeter (Hansatech Instruments Ltd., Pentney, United Kingdom). Details are described in Schreiber et al. (1986). With the recorded data, the electron transport rate (ETR) was calculated as described in Krall and Edwards (1992). Finally, the total content of chlorophyll described by Hiscox and Israelstam (1979) was determined. 50 mg of randomly selected leaves were ground using a mortar containing 100% acetone: 0.9% saline solution (4.1; v/v). The resulting extract was resuspended in acetone and measured at 652 nm using a spectrophotometer (Lambda 25; PerkinElmer, Walthmam, MA, United States) and the total chlorophyll content was determined using the formula described by Arnon (1949). Samples were run in duplicate.
Antioxidant enzyme analysis
Guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) enzymatic activity were measured with leaves and roots randomly collected from each of the treatments at the end of the experiment. Immediately after the collection, the samples were deposited in nitrogen liquid and stored at −80°C until homogenized. 48 h after storage, 500 mg of plant material were homogenized in extraction buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.6) and centrifuged at 4°C and 9,000 rpm for 20 min, and the plant extract was stored at −80°C. Total protein concentration was measured in the plant extract following the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) using a BSA standard curve. In guaiacol peroxidase activity (GPX), guaiacol oxidation was measured at 470 nm. Catalase (CAT) was determined by measuring the disappearance of H2O2 at 240 nm. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was assayed using autoxidation of pyrogallol at 325 nm. Finally, for ascorbate peroxidase (APX), the oxidation of L-ascorbate was measured at 290 nm. For the determination of the autoxidation of substrates, control tests were carried out without the presence of the enzyme extract. Enzymatic activities were expressed as units per μg of protein and were measured in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyzes were determined using Statistical version 12.0 software (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, United States). The normality of the results was verified using the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. The results of each treatment were compared using one-way ANOVA, and Fisher test was performed to determine statistical differences.
Results
Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from nodules
Soil characterization
Bacteria were isolated from nodules of Medicago spp. that grows naturally in the high marshes of the Odiel River. The soil was composed of 72% sand, 0.9% organic matter, had low electrical conductivity and nutrients content, as well as moderate amounts of As, Cd, Cu and Zn. The soil characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Isolation of endophytes
A total of 33 endophytic bacteria were isolated from Medicago spp. nodules (13 strains grew in TY and 20 in TSA). They were identified based on colony morphology (color and shape of the colonies), cellular morphology (cocci, bacilli, coccobacilli) and type of cell wall by Gram staining (Gram positive or Gram negative). Other aspects such as grouping, if any (clusters, chains), or the presence of spores (central or terminal) were also observed. 85% of the strains were Gram negative bacilli and 15% were Gram positive bacilli, and only one of them presented spores (Supplementary Table 2). Subsequently, a Box-PCR of the 33 strains was performed in order to study the collection genotypically (Supplementary Figure 1). Several of the isolates showed identical band profiles, so the study was reduced to 24 strains for which the 16S rRNA genes were partially sequenced. The sequences showed similarity with Achromobacter, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Ensifer, Lelliottia, Priestia and Pseudomonas genera, being Pseudomonas and Lelliottia the most represented (Table 2).
Table 2. Identification of cultivable entophytic bacteria isolated from nodules of Medicago spp. using the EzBiocloud database.
Characterization of PGP properties, enzymatic activities and metals tolerance
PGP properties of the endophytes were determined, showing all of them four to five out of six analyzed properties, while two strains presented the six properties (Table 3; Supplementary Table 3). All the bacteria were able to produce siderophores and most of them (30) solubilized phosphate (Supplementary Table 3). N4 strain showed the highest production of siderophores according to the diameter of the halo in CAS medium (Table 3; Supplementary Table 3) and N15, N20, N30 and N31 were the best phosphate solubilizers (Supplementary Table 3). A high number of strains were able to grow in N free medium (30 isolates) and/or produced auxins (27 isolates). N8 strain produced the highest concentration of IAA, close to 18 mg.L −1 (Table 3; Supplementary Table 3). 20 strains formed biofilm and 11 isolates showed ACC deaminase activity, presenting N8 strain the highest activity, close to 10 μmol α-ketobutyrate mg protein−1 h−1 (Table 3; Supplementary Table 3).
The presence of enzymatic activities in the endophytes was studied (Supplementary Table 4). Cellulase and protease activities were the most abundant, since they were found in 22 and 17 strains, respectively (Supplementary Table 3). A low number of isolates (2 to 5) showed pectinase, lipase, chitinase or DNase activities (Supplementary Table 4).
Tolerance of the strains towards As, Cd, Cu, and Zn were determined and expressed as the maximum tolerable concentration (Table 4; Supplementary Table 5). Endophytes showed good levels of metal/loids tolerance. They tolerated concentrations as high as up to 20 mM As, 2 mM Cd, 6 mM Cu and Zn.
Selection of endophytes
Among isolated endophytes, only N10 and N12 strains belonging to Ensifer genus were rhizobia able to nodulate M. sativa, so they were selected for assays in planta. N4 and N8 were selected as nodule enhancing bacteria (NEB) candidates based on their PGP properties and enzymatic activities, since they showed all the properties assayed and 2 enzymatic activities. They were also able to tolerate moderate levels of the assayed metal/loids (Table 4).
In vitro effect of endophytes in Medicago sativa germination and nodulation
The germination of M. sativa seeds was evaluated in the presence and absence of a mixture of metals/loids by inoculating them with the selected strains, performing individual inoculations (N4, N8, N10 and N12), co-inoculations combining each of the Pseudomonas and each of the rhizobia (N4 + N10, N8 + N10, N4 + N12, and N8 + N12) or inoculation with the four strains together (N4 + N8 + N10 + N12). Inoculation improved seed germination and the consortium with the four strains reported the greatest increase, showing the highest percentage of germination both in absence and presence of metals (Figures 1A,B). The increase in the germination rate in absence or presence of metals, followed this pattern: CSN > N8 + N10 > N4 + N10 > N8 + N12 > N4 + N12 > N8 > N10 > N12 > N4 > C-. In absence of As, differences in germination among seeds inoculated with the four strains and those co-inoculated con Pseudomonas and Ensifer were not statistically significant (p < 0.001), but these germination rates were significantly higher than those recorded in seeds inoculated with a single strain. Seeds inoculated with single strains did not show significant differences in germination rates among them. The same results could be observed in presence of As, with one single difference, since seeds inoculated with the consortium showed significantly higher germination rates than seeds co-inoculated with Pseudomonas and Ensifer (p < 0,001). Non-inoculated seeds showed the lowest rates of seed germination, with significant differences, both in absence and presence of As. These significant differences were recorded at the end of the experiment.
Figure 1. In vitro effects of inoculation of M. sativa with selected PGPNE. (A) Percentage of germinated seeds without metals and (B) with metals. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 50). (C) Number of nodules in plants without As and (D) with As. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 5). Different letters indicate statistical differences between means (One-way ANOVA, LSD test, p < 0.0001). C-: non inoculation; N4: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4; N8: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8; N10: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N10; N12: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N12; N4 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N10; N8 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N10; N4 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N12; N8 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N12; CSN: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4, Pseudomonas sp. N8, Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12.
To evaluate the ability of the Pseudomonas strains to improve M. sativa nodulation induced by Ensifer, plant seedlings were inoculated or co-inoculated with combinations of Pseudomonas and Ensifer strains in square plates with or without As. Co-inoculation with either of the Pseudomonas and a Ensifer strain significantly increased the number of nodules, both in absence and presence of As, compared with the single inoculation with Ensifer (Figures 1D,E). The combination Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N10 induced more nodules than any other couple, although the plants inoculated with the combination of the four strains (CSN) showed the highest number of nodules in both conditions, with significant differences. Ensifer sp. N10 showed a better behavior in nodulation than N12 and Pseudomonas sp. N8 seemed to be better as nodule enhancing bacteria than N4.
Pseudomonas behave as nodule endophytes in Medicago sativa
Localization of Pseudomonas strains was studied using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and mCherry-labeled Pseudomonas sp. N4 and N8. Cells were visualized from 0.5 mm sections of roots and nodules of M. sativa co-inoculated with Ensifer sp. N10 and labelled N4 or N8. Examples of the results obtained are presented in Figure 2. The presence of labelled bacteria with red fluorescence could be observed both in root (Figures 2A,C) and nodule cells (Figures 2B,D). Groups of bacteria were clearly seen in the nitrogen fixation zone of M. sativa nodules, marked with a white square in the figures (Figures 2B,D).
Figure 2. Bacterial colonization. (A) Images of roots and (B) nodules of colonized M. sativa 28 days after inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 marked with mCherry and Ensifer sp. N10. (C) Images of roots and (D) nodules of colonized M. sativa 28 days after inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 marked with mCherry and Ensifer sp. N10. The white square in (B,D) marks a group of Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Pseudomonas sp. N8, respectively, in the nitrogen fixation zone.
Effect of inoculations under greenhouse conditions
Inoculation increased plant biomass
M. sativa plants were grown and inoculated under greenhouse conditions using soil from the marshes of the Odiel River (Huelva). Plant inoculation with any of the strains increased biomass, both shoots and roots, compared with non-inoculated control plants (Figure 3A). Single inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 reported higher plant shoot biomass than single inoculations with Ensifer or N4, that showed the lowest shoot and root biomasses among single inoculated plants. No significant differences in root biomass were found among plants inoculated with N8, N10 and N12. Co-inoculation with Pseudomonas-Ensifer couples produced higher values of root and shoot biomasses than any of the single inoculation treatments, except for plants inoculated with N4-N10 couple, that did not show significant differences in shoot biomass compared with plants inoculated with N8. N8 + N10 combination showed the highest value in plant shoot biomass among the Pseudomonas-Ensifer co-inoculation treatments, with significant differences (Figure 3A). Nevertheless, the highest values of root and shoot biomass were recorded in plants inoculated with the consortium of the four strains (CSN). Similitudes could be observed using plant root and shoot lengths as parameters to compare inoculation treatments (Figure 3B). Plants co-inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer reported longer shoots than those inoculated with a single strain, while the combination N8 + N10 showed the longest roots and shoots among plants co-inoculated or inoculated with a single strain. Those inoculations including Ensifer and N4 showed no significant differences in root and shoot length compared with plants inoculated only with N8. The longest roots and shoots were observed in plants inoculated with the consortium (Figure 3B). These plants also presented the highest number of leaves with the widest diameter, with statistically significant differences compared to non-inoculated controls or any of the inoculation and co-inoculation treatments (Supplementary Figure 2).
Figure 3. Effects of the inoculation of M. sativa plants with PGPNE. (A) Dry weight of shoot and roots, (B) length of shoot and roots, (C) number of nodules, and (D) nitrogen content after 60 days in pots containing soil from the high marshes of the Odiel River. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 16). Different letters indicate statistical differences between means. Lowercase and uppercase letters are used to qualify different variables and are not comparable among them (One-way ANOVA, LSD test, p < 0.001). C-: non inoculation; N4: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4; N8: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8; N10: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N10; N12: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N12; N4 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N10; N8 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N10; N4 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N12; N8 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N12; CSN: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4, Pseudomonas sp. N8, Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12.
Pseudomonas enhanced plant nodulation
Regarding the number of nodules, Pseudomonas increased the number of nodules induced by Ensifer, showing co-inoculated plants more nodules than plants inoculated only with Ensifer, with significant differences (Figure 3C). Although this result was independent of the Ensifer-Pseudomonas combination used, plants co-inoculated with strains N8 and N10 showed higher number of nodules than any other couple. The highest number of nodules was found again in plants inoculated with the consortium (Figure 3C), approximately 109 and 124% more nodules than plants inoculated with N10 and N12, respectively. Nitrogen content in stems and leaves of M. sativa plants was also evaluated (Figure 3D). Inoculation treatments increased the N content compared to non-inoculated plants, although no significant differences were found among single inoculation and co-inoculation treatments, except for single inoculation with N10, that reported lower values of N (Figure 3D). The highest content of N, with significant differences, was measured in plants inoculated with the consortium of the four strains.
Pseudomonas ameliorated the physiological state of the plants
Several photosynthetic parameters were measured in order to determine the physiological state of the plants (Figure 4; Supplementary Figure 3). Inoculated plants showed higher values in all the parameters recorded compared to non-inoculated plants and the highest values were always measured in plants inoculated with the consortium, with significant differences. Values in the net photosynthetic rate (AN) could be described by the following pattern, with significant differences: CSN > N8 + N10 > N8 + N12 = N4 + N10 = N4 + N12 > N8 = N4 > N12 = N10 > C- (Figure 4A). With the exception of the inoculation with the consortium, no differences were found in the maximum quantum efficiency of the PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) among inoculation conditions (Figure 4B). Concerning the quantum yield of the PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII), results followed the pattern: CSN > N8 + N12 = N8 + N10 = N4 + N10 > N4 + N12 = N8 > N12 = N10 = N4 > C- (Figure 4C). In the same way, plants inoculated with the consortium showed the highest values in electron transport rate (ETR), followed by plants co-inoculated with N8 + N10 (Supplementary Figure 3). Finally, values of total chlorophyll content in plants could be described by a pattern similar to the one observed for Fv/Fm: CSN > N8 + N12 = N4+ N12 = N8 + N10 = N4 + N10 > N8 = N4 > N12 = N10 > C- (Figure 4D).
Figure 4. Photosynthetic parameters of M. sativa plants inoculated with PGPNE. (A) Net photosynthetic rate (AN), (B) maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm), (C) quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII), and (D) total chlorophyll content after 60 days in pots containing soil from the high marshes of the Odiel River. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 16). Different letters indicate statistical differences between means (One-way ANOVA, LSD test, p < 0.0001). C-: non inoculation; N4: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4; N8: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8; N10: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N10; N12: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N12; N4 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N10; N8 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N10; N4 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N12; N8 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N12; CSN: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4, Pseudomonas sp. N8, Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12.
Pseudomonas increased the activity of plant antioxidant enzymes
The influence of bacterial inoculations on plant response to stress was evaluated by determining the activity of different antioxidant enzymes in roots and leaves of M. sativa (Figure 5). All the enzymatic activities increased in response to inoculation, both in roots and shoots, compared to non-inoculated plants, with higher increases in roots than in shoots. The highest enzymatic activities were always recorded in plants inoculated with the consortium, with significant differences. Guaiacol peroxidase (Figure 5A) and ascorbate peroxidase (Figure 5D) activities presented similar results, showing plants inoculated with N8 + N10 the highest levels of activity in roots among plants co-inoculated or inoculated with single strains. Concerning catalase activity, plants co-inoculated with Pseudomonas-Ensifer couples had higher levels of activities in roots and shoots than those inoculated only with one strain, with the single exception of plants inoculated with N10, that showed the same level activity in shoots than co-inoculated plants (Figure 5C). Finally, plants inoculated with the combination N4 + N10 showed more superoxide dismutase activity in roots and shoots than any other inoculation condition, with the exception of plants inoculated with the consortium (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. Antioxidant enzymes in M. sativa plants inoculated with PGPNE. (A) Guaiacol peroxidase, (B) superoxide dismutase, (C) catalase, and (D) ascorbate peroxidase activities after 60 days in pots containing soil from the high marshes of the Odiel River. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 16). Different letters indicate statistical differences between means. Lowercase and uppercase letters are used to qualify different variables and are not comparable among them (One-way ANOVA; LSD test, p < 0.001). C-: non inoculation; N4: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4; N8: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8; N10: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N10; N12: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N12; N4 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N10; N8 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N10; N4 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N12; N8 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N12; CSN: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4, Pseudomonas sp. N8, Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12.
Pseudomonas increased metal accumulation in roots
Accumulation of As and the most abundant metals in the high marshes of the Odiel river was determined in M. sativa tissues at the end of the greenhouse experiment (Figure 6). The highest levels of metal/loids found in shoots were 1.5 ppm of As, 0.04 ppm of Cd, 27.76 ppm of Cu and 61.2 ppm of Zn, without significant differences among inoculation conditions (Supplementary Table 6). Different behavior was observed in roots. Single inoculations with rhizobia (N10 and N12) reduced As accumulation in roots compared to control plants (Figure 6A). Plants inoculated with rhizobia also showed the lowest values of Cu and Cd accumulated in roots compared with the rest of inoculation conditions (Figures 6B,C). Concerning Zn, the lowest amounts were recorded in plants inoculated with N12 and the highest in plants inoculated with N8, while plants inoculated with the other strains (N4 and N10) accumulated the same amount of this metal (Figure 6D). On the contrary, the highest values of metal accumulation were found in roots of plants inoculated with the consortium of the four bacteria (Figure 6). In general, plants inoculated with Pseudomonas-Ensifer couples accumulated more As and metals in roots than those inoculated only with Pseudomonas, with the exceptions of Cu and Cd in plants inoculated with the couple N8-N10 (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Accumulation of metal/loids in roots of M. sativa. (A) Accumulation of arsenic, (B) copper, (C) cadmium, and (D) zinc after 60 days in pots containing soil from the high marshes of the Odiel River. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 16). Different letters indicate statistical differences between means (One-way ANOVA; LSD test, p < 0.001). C-: non inoculation; N4: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4; N8: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8; N10: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N10; N12: inoculation with Ensifer sp. N12; N4 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N10; N8 + N10: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N10; N4 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Ensifer sp. N12; N8 + N12: co-inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N8 and Ensifer sp. N12; CSN: inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. N4, Pseudomonas sp. N8, Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12.
Discussion
Climate change and human activities are causing abiotic stress in many soils previously suitable for crops. Use of agrochemicals, heavy metals release, drought or salinity cause a great loss of nutrients and native microorganisms in the soil, altering plant adaptation and growth (García-Martí et al., 2019; Du et al., 2021). Environmentally friendly solutions to regenerate soils should include the use of leguminous plants, since they are high biomass producers, reduce the use of nitrogen-based fertilizers and can be used for fed or feeder in agriculture (Graham and Vance, 2003; Ferreira et al., 2021). In addition, most legumes are metal phytostabilizers suitable for regeneration of metal contaminated soils (Jach et al., 2022). Legume adaptation and growth in nutrient-poor or degraded soils can be enhanced using adequate autochthonous rhizospheric or endophytic PGPB as inoculants (Monteoliva et al., 2022).
The objective pursued in this work was the isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from nodules of Medicago spp. plants growing in the estuary of the Odiel river (Huelva, Spain), capable of improving seed germination, nodulation and growth of M. sativa in soils with low nutrient content and moderate to high levels of heavy metals. 33 strains belonging to genera previously described as nodule endophytes, such as Achromobacter, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Lelliottia, Pantoea, Priestia or Pseudomonas (Aserse et al., 2013; Martínez-Hidalgo and Hirsch, 2017), were isolated. Among NRE, Pseudomonas was the most represented genus and only two isolated were nodule inducing rhizobia from Ensifer genus, the most common Medicago symbiont frequently isolated from wild legumes growing in arid soils (Mnasri et al., 2007; León-Barrios et al., 2009; Bessadok et al., 2020).
Characterization of the isolates revealed the presence of at least 4 out of 6 PGP properties studied, several enzymatic activities and moderate to high levels of As and metals tolerance in all of them. Strains Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Pseudomonas sp. N8, showing all the PGP properties assayed, were selected for in planta experiments to determine their potential as nodule enhancing endophytes (NEE) in co-inoculation with Ensifer sp. N10 and Ensifer sp. N12. In this work, strains N4 and N8 have proved to be nodule endophytes, since fluorescent m-Cherry labelled strains were observed inside M. sativa roots and nodules induced by Ensifer.
Inoculation with the selected endophytes improved M. sativa seeds germination both in presence and absence of As and metals. Several properties may have contributed to this effect: (i) ACC deaminase activity, observed in N4 and N8, that regulates stress level in plants through ethylene degradation (Penrose and Glick, 2003; Chandwani and Amaresan, 2022), (ii) IAA produced by the selected strains, a hormone involved in plant development (Khan et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021), and (iii) cellulase activity presents in strains N8, N10 and N12, a lytic enzyme that could participate in plant cell wall degradation during seed germination (Flores-Duarte et al., 2022b). The combined effect of these and other properties would also explain why co-inoculation experiments showed better results than single inoculation with one strain and the highest percentage of germination was observed in seeds inoculated with the consortium of the four strains.
The ability of the selected NEE to promote M. sativa growth and nodulation in greenhouse conditions was evaluated in soils collected from Odiel river marshes, with low levels of nutrients and moderate to high amounts of As and metals. Inoculation with any of the strains improved plant biomass, root and shoot length and number and diameter of the leaves. This improvement was generally higher in plants co-inoculated with Pseudomonas-Ensifer couples than in plants inoculated with one single strain. The highest plant weights and heights were recorded in plants inoculated with the four strains. The increase in the length of plant roots and shoots may be related to the production of IAA (Khan et al., 2020), that plays an essential role in the development and growth of plants, by increasing cell expansion and is an essential hormone in root development (Hu et al., 2021). Endophyte properties related with nutrient acquisition could also be involved in these results. P availability in the soil is a limiting factor for plant growth and development (Timofeeva et al., 2022). Endophytes could provide phosphorus through phosphate solubilization (Mei et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). In legumes, P helps in the nodulation process, amino acid and proteins synthesis (Wang et al., 2020). Through siderophore production endophytes can provide essential metals such iron and Zn (Mahanty et al., 2017). Other related properties that influence legume growth could be biofilm formation, that is an important mechanism during bacterial attachment to the root, facilitating root colonization and endophyte entry and, at the same time, enhancing nutrient absorption (Das et al., 2012). Finally, the production of lytic enzymes by endophytes could benefit plant growth. These enzymes are essential in the symbiosis between plants and microorganisms, since they contribute to the degradation of organic matter, the colonization of bacteria, the acquisition of nutrients (Wang and Dai, 2010; Eid et al., 2021), and the degradation of starch as an energy source in the germination stage (Walitang et al., 2017).
Concerning nitrogen, co-inoculation with Ensifer and Pseudomonas increased the number of nodules induced by Ensifer in single inoculations, both in presence and absence of metals, in vitro and in greenhouse conditions. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in the amount of nitrogen accumulated in shoots among inoculation conditions, except in plants inoculated with the consortium that showed the highest levels of nitrogen with significant differences. ACC deaminase activity present in Pseudomonas could have facilitated the reduction of the stress levels in the the plants by reducing ethylene (Singh et al., 2022), which in excess causes defoliation, senescence and inhibit cell elongation, among other effects (Fatma et al., 2022). In that way, ACC deaminase favors germination, nodulation, and the development of plants (Singh et al., 2022). ACC deaminase activity and IAA production also play an interesting role in the nodulation process by delaying the senescence of the nodule, creating an interaction with the bacteroid (Alemneh et al., 2020). Strains N4 and N8 grew in a nitrogen-free medium, suggesting that they could fix atmospheric nitrogen. In a work in progress, nitrogenase genes (nifKDH) have been amplified in these strains (data not shown). This could explain the high levels of nitrogen measured in plant inoculated with Pseudomonas.
The positive effects of Pseudomonas-Ensifer co-inoculation on plant development were also reflected in the physiological state of the plants, since co-inoculations improved most of the photosynthetic parameters analyzed: AN, ΦPSII, ETR and total chlorophyll, except for plants co-inoculated with N4 + N12 plants, that showed the same values of ΦPSII than plants inoculated with N8. In addition, plants inoculated with the consortium of the four strains showed the highest efficiency of photosystem II (ΦPSII), the best balance of carbon and water assimilation, the greatest efficiency in the use of energy from the photochemical apparatus, and the biggest increase in total chlorophyll (Liu et al., 2020).
In this work, the levels of stress in M. sativa plants were measured by recording the activity of antioxidant defense enzymes, particularly catalase, guaiacol peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase, that act as protectors against reactive oxygen species (ROS). An excess of ROS production as well as a decrease in the antioxidant defense mechanism causes a breakdown of cell function, damaging the plant and reducing its development (Redondo-Gómez et al., 2011; Mesnoua et al., 2016). Our results showed higher enzymatic activities in plants co-inoculated with Ensifer and Pseudomonas than in single inoculated plants and the highest activities in plants inoculated with the consortium of the four bacteria. This pointed to the role of these bacteria in regulating stress mechanisms in plants. Induction of antioxidant enzymatic activities after inoculation with rhizospheric bacteria has been reported in plants of M. sativa under heavy metal stress (Raklami et al., 2019) and nutrient deficiency (Flores-Duarte et al., 2022b), and in crops such as maize, where inoculated plants showed an increase of catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activities (Kukreti et al., 2020; Chaudhary et al., 2021; Agri et al., 2022). Concerning endophytes, increased enzymatic activities have been reported recently in M. sativa plants growing under stress conditions and inoculated with a bacterial consortium containing Variovorax nodule endophytes (Flores-Duarte et al., 2022a).
The use of legumes and associated rhizobia is an interesting tool to fight against soil metal contamination, since legume interacting with rhizobia have the ability to accumulate high concentrations of metals particularly in roots, with low levels of translocation to shoots, without disturbing plant growth (Jach et al., 2022). In this work, the highest levels of As, Cd, Cu and Zn measured in shoots of M. sativa were much below those allowed for human or animal consumption (Junta de Andalucía and Consejeria de Medio Ambiente, 1999), indicating that our strategy would not be dangerous for living beings in terms of metals mobilization. Regarding the accumulation of metals/loids in the roots, inoculation with Pseudomonas or Pseudomonas-Ensifer couples promoted metal accumulation and the highest levels of As, Cd, Cu and Zn were measured in M. sativa roots inoculated with the consortium of the four strains (CSN). In that way, inoculation with Pseudomonas strains enhanced the metal phytostabilization potential of M. sativa plants in soils with moderate to high levels of metals, without negative effects on plant growth.
Although combinations of Pseudomonas and Ensifer strains, and particularly those including N8, had a significant positive effect on M. sativa growth and nodulation, the best results were always recorded in plants inoculated with the consortium containing the four strains, demonstrating the advantages of using a consortium with several strains and the collaborative effects of their properties.
A consortium of three rhizospheric bacteria able to promote M. sativa growth and adaptation in estuarine soils with nutrients poverty has been recently reported (Flores-Duarte et al., 2022b). These PGPB inoculated as consortium in poor-nutrient soils increased plant shoot biomass (around 100%) and ameliorated M. sativa nodulation (around 50%) compared to plants inoculated only with rhizobia. Although we have to consider differences between soils to establish comparisons, particularly due to levels of metal contamination, in the current work our consortium of endophytes increased plant shoot biomass around 100% and also ameliorated M. sativa nodulation around 100% compared to plants inoculated only with the best performing rhizobia for each parameter. Despite these differences in nodulation improvement, both consortiums induced similar increases in plant N content (around 1 g/100 g). Inoculation of M. sativa with the rhizospheric consortium also induced positive effects on plant photosynthetic status under nutrient deficiency (Flores-Duarte et al., 2022b). All the photosynthetic parameters recorded showed increased values in plants inoculated with the consortium compared to plants inoculated only with rhizobia, even though, parameters such as AN or ΦPSII showed no significant differences (Flores-Duarte et al., 2022b). In this work, significant differences in the levels of all the photosynthetic parameters recorded, including AN and ΦPSII, were observed between plants inoculated with the consortium and those inoculated with rhizobia, suggesting that endophytes were more efficient in enhancing the photosynthetic status of the plant than rhizospheric bacteria.
The presence of moderate to high levels of metals in the soil, increasing M. sativa stress conditions, required the isolation and characterization of specific bacteria able to help the plant to deal with these particular environmental conditions. Our results suggest that inoculants based on non-rhizobial nodule endophytes could be useful and efficient tools to enhance legume adaptation and growth in metal contaminated and nutrient-poor soils. At least under stress conditions, endophytes could provide some advantages as PGPB compared to rhizospheric bacteria, in addition to their narrower relationship with the plant and the lack of competence with soil bacteria (Adeleke and Babalola, 2021; Dwibedi et al., 2022). In that way, it looks necessary to investigate microbiomes of a wide diversity of nitrogen-fixing nodules to find useful inoculants to be applied in different environmental conditions (Martínez-Hidalgo and Hirsch, 2017).
Conclusion
Autochthonous Pseudomonas sp. N4 and Pseudomonas sp. N8 strains enhanced growth, nodulation and metal accumulation in roots of M. sativa plants inoculated with wild type Ensifer strains in soils with low nutrients content and moderate to high levels of metals, ameliorating the physiological state of the plants and helping to regulate plant stress mechanisms, thus facilitating plant adaptation to these abiotic stresses. Our results suggest that selected native PGPNE (plant growth promoting nodule endophytes) could be adequate biotools to promote legume adaptation, growth and phytostabilization potential in nutrient-poor and/or metal contaminated estuarine soils.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, OP060607-OP0606030.
Author contributions
IR-L and SN-T: conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation. NF-D and SC-D: methodology and investigation. SN-T: software. SN-T and NF-D: formal analysis. EM-N and SR-G: data curation. IR-L, EM-N, and EP: writing—review and editing and funding acquisition. IR-L and SR-G: supervision. EP: project administration. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was funded by MCIN, project MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, UE “NextGenerationEU/PRTR (PDC2021-120951-I00) and Junta de Andalucía, I + D + I FEDER Andalucía project US-1262036 and PAIDI2020, project P20_00682.
Acknowledgments
We thank the personnel from the greenhouse and the microscopy service of the Central Services of the Universidad de Sevilla (CITIUS) for their help. NF-D also thanks Universidad de Sevilla for personal support through “Ayudas al estudio a refugiados” (Oficina de Cooperación al Desarrollo).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1005458/full#supplementary-material
References
Abdu, N., Abdullahi, A. A., and Abdulkadir, A. (2017). Heavy metals and soil microbes. Environ. Chem. Lett. 15, 65–84. doi: 10.1007/s10311-016-0587-x
Adeleke, B. S., and Babalola, O. O. (2021). The endosphere microbial communities, a great promise in agriculture. Int. Microbiol. 24, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10123-020-00140-2
Agri, U., Chaudhary, P., Sharma, A., and Kukreti, B. (2022). Physiological response of maize plants and its rhizospheric microbiome under the influence of potential bioinoculants and nanochitosan. Plant Soil 474, 451–468. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05351-2
Alemneh, A. A., Zhou, Y., Ryder, M. H., Denton, M. D., Denton, M., and Zhou, Y. (2020). Mechanisms in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that enhance legume-rhizobial symbioses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 129, 1133–1156. doi: 10.1111/jam.14754
Aponte, H., Meli, P., Butler, B., Paolini, J., Matus, F., Merino, C., et al. (2020). Meta-analysis of heavy metal effects on soil enzyme activities. Sci. Total Environ. 737:139744. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139744
Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. polyphenoloxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24, 1–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1
Aserse, A. A., Räsänen, L. A., Aseffa, F., Hailemariam, A., and Lindström, K. (2013). Diversity of sporadic symbionts and nonsymbiotic endophytic bacteria isolated from nodules of woody, shrub, and food legumes in Ethiopia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 10117–10134. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5248-4
Bessadok, K., Navarro-Torre, S., Pajuelo, E., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Redondo-Gómez, S., Caviedes, M. Á., et al. (2020). The ACC-deaminase producing bacterium Variovorax sp. CT7.15 as a tool for improving Calicotome villosa nodulation and growth in arid regions of Tunisia. Microorganisms 8:541. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040541
Bouyoucos, G. J. (1936). Directions for making mechanical analyses of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Sci. 42, 225–230. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193609000-00007
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Caracciolo, A. B., and Terenzi, V. (2021). Rhizosphere microbial communities and heavy metals. Microorganisms 9:1462. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071462
Carrasco, J. A., Armario, P., Pajuelo, E., Burgos, A., Caviedes, M. A., Lopez, J. A. C., et al. (2005). Isolation and characterisation of symbiotically effective Rhizobium resistant to arsenic and heavy metals after the toxic spill at the Aznalcóllar pyrite mine. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1131–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.015
Chandwani, S., and Amaresan, N. (2022). Role of ACC deaminase producing bacteria for abiotic stress management and sustainable agriculture production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29, 22843–22859. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18745-7
Chaudhary, P., Khati, P., Gangola, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, R., and Sharma, A. (2021). Impact of nanochitosan and Bacillus spp. on health, productivity and defence response in Zea mays under field condition. 3 Biotech 11:237. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02790-z
Chaudhary, P., Singh, S., Chaudhary, A., Sharma, A., and Kumar, G. (2022). Overview of biofertilizers in crop production and stress management for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 13:930340. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.930340
Chen, Y., Hu, W., Huang, B., Weindorf, D. C., Rajan, N., Liu, X., et al. (2013). Accumulation and health risk of heavy metals in vegetables from harmless and organic vegetable production systems of China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 98, 324–330. doi: 10.1016/j.2013.09.037
Das, N., Basak, L. V. G., Salam, J. A., and Abigail, E. A. (2012). Application of biofilms on remediation of pollutants- an overview. J. Microbiol. Biotech. Res. 2, 783–790.
De Meyer, S. E., De Beuf, K., and Vekeman, B. A. (2015). Large diversity of non-rhizobial endophytes found in legume root nodules in Flanders (Belgium). Soil Biol. Biochem. 83, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.002
del Castillo, I., Hernández, P., Lafuente, A., Rodríguez-Llorente, I., Caviedes, M., and Pajuelo, E. (2012). Self-bioremediation of cork-processing wastewaters by (chloro)phenol-degrading bacteria immobilised onto residual cork particles. Water Res. 46, 1723–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.038
Döebereiner, J. (1995). “Isolation and identification of aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria from soil and plants,” in Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. eds. K. Alef and P. Nannipieri (London, UK: Academic Press), 134–141.
Du, B., Chen, N., Song, L., Wang, D., Cai, H., Yao, L., et al. (2021). Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) MsCML46 gene encoding calmodulin-like protein confers tolerance to abiotic stress in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 40, 1907–1922. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02757-7
Dwibedi, V., Rath, S. K., Joshi, M., Kaur, R., Kaur, G., Singh, D., et al. (2022). Microbial endophytes: application towards sustainable agriculture and food security. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106, 5359–5384. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-12078-8
Ehrhardt, D. W., Atkinson, M. E., and Long, S. R. (1992). Depolarization of alfalfa root hair membrane potential by Rhizobium meliloti nod factors. Science 256, 998–1000. doi: 10.1126/10744524
Eid, A. M., Fouda, A., Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Salem, S. S., Elsaied, A., Oelmüller, R., et al. (2021). Harnessing bacterial endophytes for promotion of plant growth and biotechnological applications: an overview. Plan. Theory 10:935. doi: 10.3390/plants10050935
Elbeltagy, A., Nishioka, K., Suzuki, H., Sato, T., Sato, Y. I., Morisaki, H., et al. (2000). Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteri from wild and traditionally cultivated rice varieties. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 46, 617–629. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2000.10409127
Etesami, H., Jeong, B. R., and Glick, B. R. (2021). Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, phosphate–solubilizing bacteria, and silicon to P uptake by plant. Front. Plant Sci. 12:699618. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.699618
FAO, ITPS. (2015) Status of the World’s soil resources (SWSR). - Main report. Roma: FAO and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils: Roma, Italy.
Fasusi, O. A., Cruz, C., and Babalola, O. O. (2021). Agricultural sustainability: microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture 11:163. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11020163
Fatma, M., Asgher, M., Iqbal, N., Rasheed, F., Sehar, Z., Sofo, A., et al. (2022). Ethylene signaling under stressful environments: analyzing collaborative knowledge. Plants 11:2211. doi: 10.3390/plants11172211
Ferreira, H., Vasconcelos, M., Gil, A. M., and Pinto, E. (2021). Benefits of pulse consumption on metabolism and health: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 85–96. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1716680
Finan, T. M., Kunkel, B., De Vos, G. F., and Signer, E. R. (1986). Second symbiotic megaplasmid in rhizobium meliloti carrying exopolysaccharide and thiamine synthesis genes. J. Bacteriol. 167, 66–72. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.66-72.1986
Flores-Duarte, N. J., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Redondo-Gómez, S., Pajuelo, E., Rodriguez-Llorente, I. D., and Navarro-Torre, S. (2022b). Role of nodulation-enhancing rhizobacteria in the promotion of Medicago sativa development in nutrient-poor soils. Plan. Theory 11:1164. doi: 10.3390/plants11091164
Flores-Duarte, N. J., Pérez-Pérez, J., Navarro-Torre, S., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Redondo-Gómez, S., Pajuelo, E., et al. (2022a). Improved Medicago sativa nodulation under stress assisted by Variovorax sp. endophytes. Plan. Theory 11:1091. doi: 10.3390/plants11081091
García-Martí, M., Piñero, M. C., García-Sanchez, F., Mestre, T. C., López-Delacalle, M., Martínez, V., et al. (2019). Amelioration of the oxidative stress generated by simple or combined abiotic stress through the K+ and Ca2+ supplementation in tomato plants. Antioxid. 8:81. doi: 10.3390/8040081
Genty, B., Briantais, J. M., and Baker, N. R. (1989). The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 990, 87–92. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9
Gordon, S. A., and Weber, R. P. (1951). Colorimetric estimation of indole acetic acid. Plant Physiol. 26, 192–195. doi: 10.1104/pp.26.1.192
Graham, P. H., and Vance, C. P. (2003). Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol. 131, 872–877. doi: 10.1104/pp.017004
Hiscox, J. D., and Israelstam, G. F. (1979). A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can. J. Bot. 57, 1332–1334. doi: 10.1139/b79-163
Hu, Q. Q., Shu, J. Q., Li, W. M., and Wang, G. Z. (2021). Role of auxin and nitrate signaling in the development of root system architecture. Front. Plant Sci. 12:690363. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.690363
Hudson-Edwards, K. A., Schell, C., and y Macklin, M. G. (1999). Mineralogy y geochemistry of alluvium contaminated by metal mining in the Rio Tinto area, Southwest Spain. Appl. Geochem. 14, 1015–1030. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00008-6
Jach, M. E., Sajnaga, E., and Ziaja, M. (2022). Utilization of legume-nodule bacterial symbiosis in phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. Biology 11:676. doi: 10.3390/biology11050676
Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Medio Ambiente. (1999). Los criterios y estándares para declarar un suelo contaminado en Andalucía y la metodología y técnicas de toma de muestra y análisis para su investigación. Available at: https://www.ugr.es/~fjmartin/INFORMES/Criterios%20y%20estandares.pdf. [Accessed July 2022].
Kang, S.-M., Shahzad, R., Khan, M. A., Hasnain, Z., Lee, K.-E., Park, H.-S., et al. (2021). Ameliorative effect of indole-3-acetic acid- and siderophore-producing Leclercia adecarboxylata MO1 on cucumber plants under zinc stress. J. Plant Interact. 16, 30–41. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2020.1864039
Khan, M. S., Gao, J., Chen, X., Zhang, M., Yang, F., Du, Y., et al. (2020). Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa SK1 from Lilium lancifolium. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020:8650957. doi: 10.1155/2020/8650957
Krall, J. P., and Edwards, G. E. (1992). Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. Physiol. Plant. 86, 180–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb01328.x
Kukreti, B., Sharma, A., Chaudhary, P., Agri, U., and Maithani, D. (2020). Influence of nanosilicon dioxide along with bioinoculants on Zea mays and its rhizospheric soil. 3 Biotech 10:345. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02329-8
Lagendijk, E. L., Validov, S., Lamers, G. E. M., de Weert, S., and Bloemberg, G. V. (2010). Genetic tools for tagging gram-negative bacteria with mCherry for visualization in vitro and in natural habitats, biofilm and pathogenicity studies. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 305, 81–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01916.x
León-Barrios, M., Lorite, M. J., Donate-Correa, J., and Sanjuán, J. (2009). Ensifer meliloti bv. Lancerottense establishes nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with Lotus endemic to the Canary Islands and shows distinctive symbiotic genotypes and host range. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 32, 413–420. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2009.04.003
Liu, J., Liu, X., Zhang, Q., Li, S., Sun, Y., Lu, W., et al. (2020). Response of alfalfa growth to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria under different phosphorus application levels. AMB Express 10:200. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01137-w
Lurthy, T., Cantat, C., Jeudy, C., Declerck, P., Gallardo, K., Barraud, C., et al. (2020). Impact of bacterial siderophores on iron status and ionome in pea. Front. Plant Sci. 11:730. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00730
Mahanty, T., Bhattacharjee, S., Goswami, M., Bhattacharyya, P., Das, B., Ghosh, A., et al. (2017). Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 3315–3335. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8104-0
Martínez-Hidalgo, P., and Hirsch, A. M. (2017). The nodule microbiome: N-2-fixing rhizobia do not live alone. Phytobiomes J. 1, 70–82. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-12-16-0019-RVW
Mateos-Naranjo, E., Mesa, J., Pajuelo, E., Perez-Martin, A., Caviedes, M. A., and Rodríguez-Llorente, I. D. (2015). Deciphering the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the tolerance of the invasive cordgrass Spartina densiflora to physicochemical properties of marshes soils. Plant Soil 394, 45–55. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2504-7
Mei, C., Chretien, R. L., Amaradasa, B. S., He, Y., Turner, A., and Lowman, S. (2021). Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterial endophytes and plant growth promotion in vitro and in greenhouse. Microorganisms 9:1935. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091935
Mesa, J., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Caviedes, M. A., Redondo-Gómez, S., Pajuelo, E., and Rodríguez-Llorente, I. D. (2015b). Endophytic cultivable bacteria of the metal bioaccumulator Spartina maritima improve plant growth but not metal uptake in polluted marshes soils. Front. Microbiol. 6:1450. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01450
Mesa, J., Naranjo, E. M., Caviedes, M., Redondo-Gómez, S., Pajuelo, E., and Rodríguez-Llorente, I. D. (2015a). Scouting contaminated estuaries: heavy metal resistant and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the native metal rhizoaccumulator Spartina maritima. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 90, 150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.11.002
Mesnoua, M., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Barcia-Piedras, J. M., Perez-Romero, J. A., Lotmani, B., and Redondo-Gomez, S. (2016). Physiological and biochemical mechanisms preventing Cd-toxicity in the hyperaccumulator Atriplex halimus L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 106, 30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.041
Mnasri, B., Aouania, M. E., and Mhamdi, R. (2007). Nodulation and growth of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under water deficiency. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 1744–1750. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.01.030
Monteoliva, M. I., Valetti, L., Taurian, T., Crociara, C. S., and Guzzo, M. C. (2022). “Synthetic communities of bacterial endophytes to improve the quality and yield of legume crops,” in Legumes research. eds. J. C. Jimenez-Lopez and A. Clemente, Vol. 1 [Working Title (London, UK: IntechOpen).
Nautiyal, C. S. (1999). An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170, 265–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x
Navarro-Torre, S., Barcia-Piedras, J. M., Caviedes, M. A., Pajuelo, E., Redondo-Gómez, S., Rodríguez-Llorente, I. D., et al. (2017). Bioaugmentation with bacteria selected from the microbiome enhances Arthrocnemum macrostachyum metal accumulation and tolerance. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 117, 340–347. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.008
Navarro-Torre, S., Bessadok, K., Flores-Duarte, N. J., Rodríguez-Llorente, I. D., Caviedes, M. A., and Pajuelo, E. (2020). “Helping legumes under stress situations: inoculation with beneficial microorganisms,” in Legume crops. ed. M. Hasanuzzaman (London, UK: Intech Open), 1–10. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.91857
Navarro-Torre, S., Naranjo, E. M., Caviedes, M., Pajuelo, E., and Rodríguez-Llorente, I. (2016). Isolation of plant-growth-promoting and metal-resistant cultivable bacteria from Arthrocnemum macrostachyum in the Odiel marshes with potential use in phytoremediation. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 110, 133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.070
Navarro-Torre, S., Rodríguez-Llorente, I. D., Doukkali, B., Caviedes, M. A., and Pajuelo, E. (2019). Competition for alfalfa nodulation under metal stress by the metal-tolerant strain Ochrobactrum cytisi Azn6. Ann. Appl. Biol. 175, 184–192. doi: 10.1111/aab.12528
Penrose, D. M., and Glick, B. R. (2003). Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol. Plant. 118, 10–15. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00086.x
Poole, P., Ramachandran, V., and Terpolilli, V. (2018). Rhizobia: from saprophytes to endosymbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 291–303. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.171
Rajendran, G., Patel, M. H., and Joshi, S. J. (2012). Isolation and characterization of nodule-associated Exiguobacterium sp. from the root nodules of fenugreek (Trigonella foenu-graecum) and their possible role in plant growth promotion. Int. J. Microbiol 2012:693982. doi: 10.1155/2012/693982
Raklami, A., Oufdou, K., Tahiri, A.I., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Navarro-Torre, S., Rodríguez-Llorente, I.D., Meddich, A., Redondo-Gómez, S., and Pajuelo, E. (2019). Safe cultivation of Medicago sativa in metal-polluted soils from semi-arid regions assisted by heat- and metallo-resistant PGPR. Microorganisms 7:E212. doi:doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7070212
Raza, A., Razzaq, A., Mehmood, S. S., Zou, X., Zhang, X., Lv, Y., et al. (2019). Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review. Plan. Theory 8:34. doi: 10.3390/plants8020034
Redondo-Gómez, S., Andrades-Moreno, L., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Parra, R., Valera-Burgos, J., and Arcoa, R. (2011). Synergic effect of salinity and zinc stress on growth and photosynthetic responses of the cordgrass, Spartina densiflora. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 5521–5530. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err234
Roy, S., Liu, W., Nandety, R. S., Crook, A., Mysore, K. S., Pislariu, C. I., et al. (2020). Celebrating 20 years of genetic discoveries in legume nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Plant Cell 32, 15–41. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00279
Schreiber, U., Schliwa, U., and Bilger, W. (1986). Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth. Res. 10, 51–62. doi: 10.1007/BF00024185
Schwyn, B., and Neilands, J. B. (1987). Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 160, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9
Shiraishi, A., Matsushita, N., and Hougetsu, T. (2010). Nodulation in black locust by the Gammaproteobacteria pseudomonas sp. and the Betaproteobacteria Burkholderia sp. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.04.005
Singh, R. P., Ma, Y., and Shadan, A. (2022). Perspective of ACC-deaminase producing bacteria in stress agriculture. J. Biotechnol. 352, 36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.05.002
Singh, A., Sharma, R., Agrawal, M., and Marshall, F. (2010). Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of foodstuffs from the wastewater irrigated site of a dry tropical area of India. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48, 611–619. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.041
Stagnari, F., Maggio, A., Galieni, A., and Pisante, M. (2017). Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 4:2. doi: 10.1186/s40538-016-0085-1
Timofeeva, A., Galyamova, M., and Sedykh, S. (2022). Prospects for using phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms as natural fertilizers in agriculture. Plan. Theory 11:2119. doi: 10.3390/plants11162119
Velázquez, E., Martínez-Hidalgo, P., Carro, L., Alonso, P., Peix, A., Trujillo, M. E., et al. (2013). “Nodular endophytes: an untapped diversity,” in Beneficial plant—Microbial interactions: Ecology and applications. eds. B. R. M. González and J. González-López (Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press), 214–236.
Verma, S., and Kuila, A. (2019). Bioremediation of heavy metals by microbial process. Environ. Technol. Innov. 14:100369. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100369
Vishwakarma, K., Kumar, N., Shandilya, C., Mohapatra, S., Bhayana, S., and Varma, A. (2020). Revisiting plant–microbe interactions and microbial consortia application for enhancing sustainable agriculture: a review. Front. Microbiol. 11:560406. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.560406
Walitang, D. I., Kim, K., Madhaiyan, M., Kim, Y. K., Kang, Y., and Sa, T. (2017). Characterizing endophytic competence and plant growth promotion of bacterial endophytes inhabiting the seed endosphere of rice. BMC Microbiol. 17:209. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1117-0
Walkley, A., and Black, C. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Wang, Y., and Dai, C. C. (2010). Endophytes: a potential resource for biosynthesis, biotransformation and biodegradation. Ann. Microbiol. 61, 207–215. doi: 10.1007/s13213-010-0120-6
Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Kong, Y., Li, X., Li, W., Du, H., et al. (2020). GmPAP12 is required for nodule development and nitrogen fixation under phosphorus starvation in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 11:450. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00450
Yoon, S. H., Ha, S. M., Kwon, S., Lim, J., Kim, Y., Seo, H., et al. (2017). Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 67, 1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
Keywords: contaminated estuarine soils, enhanced nodulation, nodule endophytes, plant growth-promoting bacteria, phytostabilization
Citation: Flores-Duarte NJ, Caballero-Delgado S, Pajuelo E, Mateos-Naranjo E, Redondo-Gómez S, Navarro-Torre S and Rodríguez-Llorente ID (2022) Enhanced legume growth and adaptation to degraded estuarine soils using Pseudomonas sp. nodule endophytes. Front. Microbiol. 13:1005458. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1005458
Edited by:
George Newcombe, University of Idaho, United StatesReviewed by:
Parul Chaudhary, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, IndiaJulia W. Neilson, University of Arizona, United States
Copyright © 2022 Flores-Duarte, Caballero-Delgado, Pajuelo, Mateos-Naranjo, Redondo-Gómez, Navarro-Torre and Rodríguez-Llorente. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ignacio D. Rodríguez-Llorente, aXJvZHJpQHVzLmVz
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship