Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 19 December 2022
Sec. Microbiotechnology

Polyurethane biodegradation by Serratia sp. HY-72 isolated from the intestine of the Asian mantis Hierodula patellifera

Jong-Hoon KimJong-Hoon Kim1Seung Hoon ChoiSeung Hoon Choi1Min Gu ParkMin Gu Park2Dong Hwan ParkDong Hwan Park2Kwang-Hee Son
Kwang-Hee Son1*Ho-Yong Park
Ho-Yong Park1*
  • 1Microbiome Convergence Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Polyurethane (PU), currently replacing existing synthetic materials worldwide, is a synthetic polymer derived from polyols, isocyanates, and a chain extender added by condensation reactions. PU wastes which are difficult to recycle, are commonly discarded in landfills and flow into ecosystems, thereby causing serious environmental problems. In recent years, insect-associated microbes have become a promising, eco-friendly strategy as an alternative to plastic recycling. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of Serratia sp. HY-72 strain isolated from the intestine of the Asian mantis (Hierodula patellifera) for PU degradation. The 65 kDa family I.3 lipase which degrades PU was identified and characterized, with a specific activity of 2,883 U mg−1. The bacterial filtrates and the recombinant lipase degraded Impranil (a colloidal polyester-PU dispersion, 100 g l−1) by 85.24 and 78.35% after 72 h incubation, respectively. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis revealed changes in Impranil functional groups, with decreased C=O functional group and aliphatic chain signals, and increased N-H bending with C-N stretching and C-O stretching. The current study also revealed that the HY-72 strain biodegraded the commercial PU foams (polyester- and polyether- PU) with 23.95 and 10.95% weight loss after 2 weeks, respectively with changes in surface morphology and structure such as cracks, roughness, and surface roughening. Altogether, this is one of the few studies reporting biodegradation of PU by the insect-associated microbe. These findings suggest that the insect-associated microbe could be a promising resource for biodegradation and recycling of plastic waste.

1. Introduction

Plastics are composed of chains comprising numerous organic subunit linked by dynamic covalent bonds and are widely used owing to their stability, ease of manufacturing, economic efficiency, and convenience (Alabi et al., 2019; Atanasova et al., 2021; Roy et al., 2021). Plastic production has grown exponentially, with a very large number of plastics produced since 1950 (Bilal et al., 2021). Plastic disposal systems, such as incineration, recycling, and landfills, are ineffective in plastic waste management (Seneviratne et al., 2006). Plastic decomposition is extremely slow because of the chemical structure of most plastics and poor degradation capabilities of natural decomposition processes. Furthermore, it generates small particles, known as microplastics, which are more likely to cause serious ecological and biological concerns. In particular, the accumulation of plastic waste continues to have harmful effects on the ecosystem (Barnes et al., 2009; Mukherjee et al., 2011; Osman et al., 2018; Amobonye et al., 2021). Hazardous contaminants are eluted from plastic waste, causing the biological accumulation of harmful chemicals in the food chain and leading to problems such as endocrine disorders and reduced species diversity (Liaqat et al., 2020).

Polyurethane (PU) is a type of plastic with increasing usage over the decades because of its diverse properties and is currently replacing existing synthetic materials (Liu et al., 2021). PU was discovered and produced by Dr. Otto Bayer in 1937. Since then, it has become ubiquitous in modern life and is extensively used in medicine and industries (Howard, 2002). PU has a high melting point and tensile strength, improving its durability (Bayer, 1947). It is a polymer derived from the condensation of polyisocyanates and polyols with carbamate ester bonds (-NHCOO-; Nakajima-Kambe et al., 1999) and is classified into four main types according to the polyol composition (Vargas-Suárez et al., 2019). PU is commonly discarded in landfills or incinerated for heat production owing to its highly complex polymer structure (Ignatyev et al., 2014; Utomo et al., 2020). The decomposition of PUs is slow and produces serious pollutants (Liu et al., 2021). Furthermore, improper incineration generates toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide that negatively affect human health and ecosystems (McKenna and Hull, 2016; Alshehrei, 2017). Physical and chemical degradation are inefficient in eliminating PU waste. Therefore, the widespread and increasing use of PU in modern society makes biodegradation as important as manufacturing these plastics.

Since the 1960s, several studies have confirmed that microorganisms and their enzymes can degrade PUs (Schmidt et al., 2017; Magnin et al., 2020). These microorganisms either use PUs directly as nutrient sources or indirectly degrade them with several enzymes and metabolites. Esterases, lipases, proteases, and ureases produced by microorganisms can biodegrade polyester-PU (Nakajima-Kambe et al., 1999; Howard, 2002; Loredo-Treviño et al., 2012) and proteases and esterases can directly disrupt urethane binding sites (Loredo-Treviño et al., 2012). Among the hydrolysis enzymes, lipases derived from bacteria are considered more suitable for industrial environments due to their large-scale substrate specificity (Javed et al., 2018). Despite continuous research and notable success, PU-degrading enzymes remain a challenge and require extensive research. Therefore, there is a pressing need for scientific and technological advances in context of bacterial hydrolytic enzymes for PU biodegradation.

Insects have developed symbiotic interactions with numerous microorganisms to overcome environmental limitations (Sudakaran et al., 2015). Recently, the plastic-degrading capability of insect-associated microorganisms is drawing attention. Insect intestinal microbiota has evolved to produce effective degradative enzymes and utilize various substrates as nutrients to overcome environmental limitations (Sudakaran et al., 2015; Berasategui et al., 2016). They are more functional than degradative enzymes produced by microorganisms in the free-living state, and have the potential of industrial applications (Jang and Kikuchi, 2020). Previous studies have highlighted that microorganisms extracted from insect intestines can be cultured to break down plastics such as polyethene (PE) and polystyrene (PS; Yang et al., 2014, 2018). These microorganisms isolated from insects are a promising source of end-of-life solutions for plastics and have the advantage of not causing secondary pollution from plastic waste (Lee et al., 2020).

In this study, the potential PU-degrading bacterium, Serratia sp. strain HY-72, was isolated from the intestine of the Asian mantis (Hierodula patellifera). PU-biodegrading potential of the strain HY-72 was evaluated by comparing weight loss, scanning electron micrographs, and chemical composition. In addition, family I.3 lipases with PU-degrading activity were identified and evaluated from the strain HY-72.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

The commercial polyester urethane dispersion agent, Impranil DLN (Impranil; Bayer Materials Science, PA, United States), was purchased to evaluate PU biodegradation by the isolated strain. The two types of PU foams (polyester- and polyether-) were purchased from KPX Chemical Co. (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Each PU foam sample was cut into small pieces (polyester PU, 20 by 30 by 15 mm; polyether PU, 8 by 30 by 15 mm) and weighed (polyester PU, 250 mg; polyether PU, 150 mg). Three replicates of each type were soaked in 70% ethanol for 1 h and washed with sterile distilled water. Subsequently, the pieces were place in an oven at 50°C until the surface moisture was removed.

2.2. Isolation and identification of PU-degrading bacteria

Adult Asian mantis (H. patellifera) were collected from Bomoon Mountain (Daejeon, Republic of Korea) and transported to the laboratory. Insects were dissected to isolate bacterial strains using the method described by Heo et al. (2006) with minor modifications. The insects were immersed in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 1–2 min to remove the surface contaminants and then washed twice with sterile distilled water. Next, the digestive tracts were removed, and the intestinal contents were carefully recovered. The intestinal contents were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.8% NaCl, 0.02% KCl, 0.144% Na2HPO4, 0.024% KH2PO4, pH 7.4) and spread onto one-fifth strength of Reasoner’s 2A (R2A) agar (KisanBio, Seoul, Republic of Korea) containing 1% Impranil to isolate the PU-degrading gut bacteria. After incubation at 30°C for 2 days, a HY-72 bacterial strain, which only formed a translucent halo around areas of bacterial growth, was chosen for further experiments. The bacterial strain was isolated and stored at −70°C in R2A broth with 25% sterilized glycerol. Genomic DNA was extracted from the strain HY-72 and 16S rRNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for its identification. The universal primers 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC A-3′) and 1492R (5’-TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′) were used. The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene was compared with those of type strains available in the EzBioCloud database (ChunLab Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) to find closely related species. Molecular phylogeny of 16S rRNA was inferred by the neighbor-joining method in MEGA X software (Kumar et al., 2018).

2.3. Extracellular enzymatic activity

The strain HY-72 was assessed for protease and lipase production using an agar plate assay as described by Bhagobaty and Joshi (2012), with minor modifications. The revived bacterial culture was streaked onto R2A agar containing a specific substrate and incubated at 30°C for 3 days. The ability to produce protease was qualitatively confirmed by observing transparent halo zones surrounding the colonies on the R2A agar containing 2% (w/v) skim milk. The extracellular lipase activity was qualitatively determined using R2A agar with 1% (w/v) Tween 80 and 0.01% (w/v) CaCl2 and confirmed by the formation of crimson dots around the colonies, which were further measured.

2.4. Identification and characterization of PU-degradable enzymes

For the recombinant production in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) of mature lipase having PU-degrading capability, the encoding gene was amplified using specific primers, SLPoly-F containing an NdeI restriction site at the 5′-end (5′-CGCCATATGATGGGAATCTTTAAT-3′) and SLPoly-R containing a HindIII restriction site at the 5′-end (5′-GGCAAGCTTTCAGGCCAGTAC-3′), using strain HY-72 genomic DNA as a template. PCR was performed using a thermal cycler (Takara, Kyoto, Japan), and the initial template denaturation was performed for 2 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 30 s at 57°C, and 1 min at 68°C. The PCR-amplified fragment was inserted into the pET-28a (+) vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) by a ligation reaction. After transformation of the ligation mixture into E. coli BL21 (DE3), the E. coli strain containing the recombinant plasmid was grown at 37°C in LB broth (BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United States) supplemented with 50 μg ml−1 kanamycin. To overproduce lipase proteins, recombinant E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harboring pET-28a (+)/lipase were cultivated in a 5-l baffled flask with 1 l of LB broth and 50 μg ml−1 of kanamycin in a rotary shaker (150 rpm) for 18 h at 30°C. Overexpression of the target gene was induced by adding 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside when the optical density of the culture at 600 nm reached approximately 0.6. Following cultivation, lipase-expressing cells were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g) for 20 min at 4°C. The cells were thoroughly washed twice, re-suspended with PBS, and disrupted via sonication. Lysates were harvested by centrifugation (13,000 × g) for 10 min at 4°C. The recombinant protein in the lysate was purified using a Ni-NTA Fast Start Kit (QUIAGEN, Valencia, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The cleavage site for the protein’s signal peptide was predicted using the SignalIP 5.0 server.1 Conserved domain searches and protein family recognition were conducted using the Pfam server.2 The sequence of lipase from HY-72 was retrieved from the GenBank database by searching BLASTp.3 Multiple alignments of lipase amino acid sequences were achieved using Clustal W in MEGA X software. Phylogenetic analysis of lipase was conducted using MEGA X software with the neighbor-joining method. The reliability of the phylogenetic tree was checked by bootstrap analysis based on 1,000 replications.

The relative molecular mass of the purified lipase was analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; Mini-PROTEAN system, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). After electrophoresis, the proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were visualized by staining the gel with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R 250, and zymopraphy was performed on the other side of the gel, according to Vandooren et al. (2013), with minor modifications. For zymograms, a gel containing purified recombinant lipase was washed with 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0) for 15 min and subsequently placed on top of the zymogram gel with 1% Impranil as substrate. The zymogram was incubated overnight at 28°C and analyzed for clearing the following day.

Quantitative assays of protein concentrations were conducted using the Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, United States) and associated kit (Qubit Protein Assay Kit, Invitrogen, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Massachusetts, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The lipolytic activity of the purified enzymes was measured using a spectrophotometric method with p-nitrophenyl acetate (pNPA) as the substrate (Shin et al., 2021). The purified enzyme (0.1 ml) was added to 0.5 ml of 3 mM pNPA and 0.9 ml of 20 mM Tris-sulfate buffer (pH 7.5), and the biocatalytic reaction proceeded at 25°C for 5 min. After the reaction, the absorbance was measured using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (DU 730® Life Science UV/Vis spectrophotometer; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States) at 405 nm. One unit of lipase was defined as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyzed 1 μmol p-nitrophenol ml−1 min−1.

2.5. Impranil degradation assay

PS-PU Impranil biodegradation was quantitatively determined using cell-free supernatants of the strain HY-72 as described by Hung et al. (2016) with minor modifications. The isolate was cultured in a baffled Erlenmeyer flask containing 10 ml R2A medium on a rotary shaker at 30°C for 2 days. After incubation, the supernatants were separated by centrifugation at 10,000 × g and 4°C for 15 min, and subsequently filtered using a 0.22-μm filter (Millipore, United States). The cell-free filtrates were concentrated by acetone precipitation (1:4 v/v), and the precipitates were re-dissolved in 100 μl of PBS. An Impranil suspension (100 g l−1) in PBS was used as the stock solution for this assay. Dilutions of the Impranil suspension with distilled water were measured to construct a standard curve for converting the absorbance to % clearance. Cell-free precipitates (100 μl) and purified lipase (50 U) were added to 5 ml of the Impranil suspension and incubated at 30°C. The clearance of the Impranil dispersion was measured using a spectrophotometer (DU 730® Life Science UV/Vis spectrophotometer; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States) at 600 nm for 72 h at 24 h intervals.

Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (VERTEX 80v with HYPERION 2000, Bruker, Hardt, Germany) was conducted to determine the changes in the polymer bond formation of PU. After 72 h of incubation, 1 ml of the Impranil-containing supernatant was transferred into Eppendorf tubes and subsequently lyophilized using a freeze dryer (Alpha 1–4 LD plus, Martin Christ, Osterode, Germany). The spectra of freeze-dried samples were recorded at 4 cm−1 resolution and wavenumbers from 500 to 4,000 cm−1 at room temperature, including non-treated samples as the negative control. All experiments were performed in triplicates under the same conditions.

2.6. Degradation of PU foams

Pre-weighed pieces of PS-PU and PE-PU foams (as described in Section 2.1) were added to baffled Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml of R2A medium. The bacterial suspensions of the mid-log phase were inoculated into each flask and incubated on a rotary shaker (180 rpm) at 30°C for 14 days. A negative control without bacterial inoculation was also maintained under the same conditions. After incubation, the weight loss of each foam sample was calculated. The PS-PU and PE-PU foams were thoroughly washed with distilled water five times to remove the colonized bacteria on the surface and air-dried at 50°C until completely dry. The weight loss percentage was calculated as weight loss (%) = (initial weight - final weight)/initial weight × 100. The experiments were performed in triplicate under the same conditions.

The changes in the surface morphology of PU foams were observed using scanning electron microscopy. The PS-PU and PE-PU foams were thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove impurities on the surface and air-dried at 50°C until completely dry. The samples were then gold-coated with a sputter coater (Q15ORS, Quorum, East Sussex, United Kingdom) and observed using an FEI Quanta 250 FEG (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, United States). Non inoculated PU foams were examined as negative controls.

2.7. Statistical analyses

One-way ANOVA was performed using SPSS software (version 24, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). The mean values was compared using Scheffé’s method, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and identification of Impranil-degrading strain

The Impranil-degrading bacterium with a high degree of transparent halo zones on R2A agar containing 1% (v/v) Impranil was isolated from the intestines of the adult Asian mantis (H. patellifera). The isolate was selected as a promising candidate for the degradation of PU and was stored for further biodegradation studies. For phylogenetic profiling, the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolate (2,000 bp) was compared with those of type strains available in the EzBioCloud database. The isolated strain was most closely related to Serratia liquefaciens strain ATCC 27592T (NR121703), with 99.93% 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence similarity (query coverage of 92%; Figure 1A). The HY-72 strain was evaluated for the production of extracellular enzymes associated with hydrolysis of PU components (Figure 1B) The results of agar plate assay indicated that strain HY-72 has the ability to produce extracellular protease (the formation of transparent halo zone) and lipase (the formation of calcium complex); therefore, the isolate has the potential to degrade PU.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Characterization of HY-72 strain isolated from the intestine of Asian mantis (Hierodula patellifera). (A) Phylogenetic relationship of the strain HY-72 based on 16S rRNA gene sequence. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and closely related species constructed using MEGA X software. Numbers at each branches indicate the bootstrap percentage of 1,000 replications. (B) Extracellular enzymatic activities of HY-72 strain.

3.2. Identification and characterization of PU-degrading enzymes

The 1,848 bp lipase gene encoding an extracellular lipase from HY-72 was identified (Figure 2). The nucleotide sequence of the lipase was predicted to express a premature protein of 615 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 65 kDa. The active site of the extracellular lipase (serine hydrolase motif), G-X-S-X-G, was found at Gly 205, and the secretion signal, G-G-X-G-X-D-X-X-X, was found at Gly 382. A protein BLAST survey indicated that the primary sequence of premature lipase was similar to that of a S. liquefaciens S33 DB-1 lipase (ABP04234) with 99.35% identity and S. liquefaciens polyurethanase (WP_048762691) with 95.77% identity. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the primary sequence of the lipase from HY-72 shared a close evolutionary relationship with that of family I.3 extracellular lipases (Figure 3). The purified recombinant lipase from HY-72 was observed by SDS-PAGE, and their PU degradation activity was confirmed by zymogram analysis. The purified recombinant lipase had a relative molecular mass of approximately 65 kDa, and the gel used to obtain a zymogram revealed PU-clear regions (Figure 4). The specific lipolytic activity of the recombinant PU-degrading lipase for pNPA was 2,883 U mg−1 (Table 1).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Amino acid sequences of lipase from HY-72 strain. HY-72 lipase, Serratia liquefaciens L135 polyurethanase (Sll135; WP_048762691), and S. liquefaciens S33 DB-1 lipase (DB-1; ABP04234) were compared using CLUSTALW program. Orange = catalytic domain; red; nucleophilic elbow, GXSXG; blue = domain of interaction with calcium; green = glycine-rich repeats, GGXGXDXXX, interacting with calcium and type I secretion system; purple closed circles = amino acid residues that interact with calcium; black closed circles = catalytic triad.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of HY-72 family I.3 lipase and its closely related functional homologs. Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences were achieved using Clustal W in the MEGA X software. The protein sequence data used for phylogenetic analysis were retrieved from the GenBank database.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. SDS-PAGE and zymography of lipase from HY-72 strain after purification. Lane M, standard marker proteins; lane 1, the total cell lysate of lipase-expressing Escherichia coli BL21 after IPTG induction; lane 2, purified lipase; lane 3, corresponding zymogram.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Enzyme characteristics of lipase for polyurethane degradation.

3.3. Biodegradation of Impranil

The strain HY-72 and lipase were quantitatively evaluated by turbidimetric analysis to confirm the biodegradation of Impranil. Optical absorbance at 600 nm was used as a direct measurement of clearance by the bacterial filtrates and purified lipase. FTIR analysis was performed to confirm Impranil biodegradation. Visual observation of the Impranil suspension treated with filtrates of HY-72 and purified lipase showed that the turbid suspension became transparent and the value of OD600 notably decreased in a time-dependent manner (Figure 5A). After 72 h incubation, the degradation rate of the bacterial filtrates and the purified lipase was 85.24 and 70.37%, respectively, while the negative control not treated with HY 72 did not show detectable clearance of the suspension (Figure 5B). FTIR spectra of Impranil degradation by the strain HY-72 and its lipase revealed changes in functional groups, accompanied by more subtle changes at other wave numbers (Figure 6). The filtrates and purified lipase from HY-72 demonstrated a significant decrease in the signal intensity of the peak at 1,735 cm−1, indicating that the ester functional group was affected by the hydrolysis and subsequent catabolism of urethanes. The peak at 1,524 cm−1 corresponds to the N-H bending, with a notably increase in the C-N stretch. The characteristic peaks from the urethane group at 1,140 cm−1, representing C-O stretching, also increased in intensity. The peak at 704 cm−1 (aliphatic chain signals) decreased after 72 h of incubation. The results correlated with the biodegradative enzymatic activities detected in the HY-72 filtrates, as indicated by the degradation assays and FTIR analysis.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Time course of degradation of Impranil (100 g l−1) by the cell-free filtrates and purified lipase of HY-72 strain. (A) Photograph of Impranil suspensions according to incubation with the cell-free precipitates and purified lipase of HY-72 strain compared to the non-treated control. (B) Quantitative analysis of Impranil degradation. Percent clearance was determined by a spectrophotometer at 600 nm. All data were normalized to the negative control. Values followed data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters above error bars indicate a significant difference by Scheffé’s test (p < 0.05).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Comparison of FTIR spectra of Impranil degradation after 3 days of incubation with the cell-free precipitates and purified lipase of HY-72 strain and non-treated control. Arrows represent the position of peaks for the functional groups decreased or increased in intensity.

3.4. Biodegradation of PS and PE-PU foam

The degradation efficiency of the strain HY-72 for two types of PU foams (PS-PU and PE-PU) was determined by weight loss measurement and analyzing scanning electron micrographs. PS-PU and PE-PU foams showed approximately 20.34 and 5.13% weight loss, respectively (Figure 7A). The dry weight of untreated foams did not change after 2 weeks of incubation. The PU foams incubated with the bacterial isolate showed morphological changes caused by bacterial degradation. In scanning electron micrographs, PS-PU foam treated with the strain HY-72 showed holes and loss of integrity of their reticulated cell structure in panoramic views (70 × magnification); the development of bends was detected in a closer view (1,500 × magnification). Similarly, the PE-PU foam structure was disrupted, and the development of cracks, roughness, and surface roughening was evident, while the non-treated control foam maintained its structure and a smooth, intact and clear surface (Figure 7B).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Weight loss (A) and scanning electron micrographs (B) of PU foam by HY-72 strain. PS-PU foam and PE-PU foam were incubated with the HY-72 strain for 14 days. Each pair of foam pieces presents the control foam (left) compared to the HY-72 treated foam (right). Values followed data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance between compared groups is indicated as * p < 0.05.

4. Discussion

Insects exhibit remarkable adaptations to various environmental factors. These adaptation are closely related to the changes in the profile of their gut microorganisms as well as associated functions (Dillon and Dillon, 2004). Insect-associated microbes produce various bioactive molecules and effective digestive enzymes, which have great potential for industrial applications (Jang and Kikuchi, 2020). Insect-associated gut microbes have been studied for their bioremediation ability using contaminants, pollutants, and toxins as nutritional sources (Loredo-Treviño et al., 2012; Banerjee et al., 2021). Insects and their gut microbes have gained attention as promising resources for plastic biodegradation (Bilal et al., 2021). Recent studies have reported that bacterial strains from Tenebrio molitor (Yang et al., 2015) and Triboluim castaneum (Wang et al., 2020) efficiently degrade polystyrene. Bacteria isolated from Plodia initerpunctella (Yang et al., 2014) and T. molitor (Yin et al., 2020) have been reported to degrade PE. This study evaluated insect symbiotic microbes and their secreted lipases for PU biodegradation. Serratia sp. strain HY-72 was isolated from the intestine of the adult Asian mantis (H. patellifera), and its PU-degradation activity was investigated. This is the first report demonstrating PU degradation by a Serratia sp. and its exogenous lipases isolated from the intestine of the insects.

Various bacteria utilize exogenous enzymes to degrade polymers, and use them as nutritional sources for their assimilation and metabolism. Several extracellular enzymes responsible for PU biodegradation have been studied (Biffinger et al., 2015). The enzymes that degrade PU by hydrolysis include protease, lipase, esterase, and urease, and the synergistic action of these enzymes could improve the biodegradation of PU through their co-metabolic interactions (Howard, 2002; shah et al., 2016). Based on the results, it was hypothesized that the biodegradation of PU by HY-72 strain mainly occurs via extracellular enzymatic activities. The genus Serratia produces exogenous enzymes, such as proteases and esterases (Gupta et al., 2004). The 65 kDa purified recombinant lipolytic enzyme from HY-72 showed lipase activity and degraded PU. The results were consistent with those of a previous study in which 65 kDa lipase from S. liquefaciens L135 from cow’s milk had lipolytic activity, and the modeled and validated structure of this polyurethanase was able to bind urethane by molecular docking (Salgado et al., 2021). Comparing the purified recombinant lipase from HY-72 with polyurethanase from S. liquefaciens L135, there were 26 amino acids, of which 6 were different in the catalytic domain and 10 in the interaction domain with calcium. In addition, Thr 385 of the secession signal in the interaction domain with calcium was different. The specific activity of lipase from HY-72 was 2,883 U mg−1, and polyurethanase from S. liquefaciens L135 was 2,793 U mg−1, using pNPA as a substrate (Salgado et al., 2021). The present study confirms family I.3 lipase has a PU-degrading ability.

Impranil has been widely used as a substrate for detecting the PS-PU hydrolyzing activity of bacterial strains (Schmidt et al., 2017); it is an aqueous aliphatic polymer composed of spheres 200 nm or less that can remain suspended in aqueous media (Biffinger et al., 2015). The HY-72 filtrates and purified recombinant lipase showed PU degradation rates of 85.24 and 70.37%, respectively. Various types of protease are known to hydrolyze urethane bonds, leading to release of carbon dioxide and formation of amines and alcohols (Mahajan and Gupta, 2015). A previous study suggested that all tested strains with PU degradative capabilities were closely related in their protease activity (Loredo-Treviño et al., 2012). In this study, the higher PU degradation rate achieved by cell filtrates is believed to be due to a synergistic effect between the protease and lipase of the HY-72 strain. In comparison, Pseudomonas putida A12 from soil showed that Impranil was degraded by 45% after 2 days (Peng et al., 2014). Lasiodiplodia sp. strain E2611A and Cladosporium pseudocladosporioides T1.PL.1 showed 85 and 87% Impranil degradation rate after 14 days (Russell et al., 2011; Álvarez-Barragán et al., 2016). The FTIR spectrum analysis demonstrated Impranil breakdown due to the attack on functional groups, in accordance with those previously reported by Peng et al. (2014) and Álvarez-Barragán et al. (2016). Based on the Impranil degradation assay and FTIR analysis, the strain HY-72 and family I.3 lipase could be a potential resource for the biodegradation of colloidal PS-PU. The quantitative and visual analyses of PS- and PE- PU foam degraded by the strain HY-72 indicated that PS-PU (with weight loss of 20.34%) had a higher degradation rate than PE-PU after 2 weeks of incubation. These results indicate that the strain HY-72 and its exogenous enzyme could also participate in the biodegradation of foam type-PU, which has urethane and ester groups. In the scanning electron micrographs, the PS- and PE-PU foams showed disruption and loss of integrity of their reticulated cell structure and changes in the surface morphology, which is consistent with previous reports (Gautam et al., 2007; Spontón et al., 2013; Gómez et al., 2014; Pellizzi et al., 2014; Álvarez-Barragán et al., 2016; Pérez-Lara et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2020). Therefore, the strain HY-72 has the potential to biodegrade PU. However, practical biodegradation on a large scale and information on the bioconversion of PU by microbial strains are limited and remains a challenging subject for managing plastic waste. Therefore, further studies are needed to verify the metabolic pathways and the mechanism of bioconversion, also its degradation system optimization.

A PU-degrading bacterium, Serratia sp. strain HY-72, was isolated from the intestine of the Asian mantis (H. patellifera) and evaluated its PU-degrading activity. The results confirmed that this strain can degrade aqueous aliphatic PS-PU polymer, Impranil, and two types of foam (PS- and PE-PU; Figure 8). The 65 kDa lipase of I.3 lipase family isolated from this strain was identified as a PU-degrading enzyme with high specific lipolytic activity. Further studies on the degradation mechanism and its optimization as well as on the practical applications of the HY-72 strain for real-world PU waste management is required and should employ multi-omics (e.g., genomics, proteomics, metabolomics), synthetic microbial communities (e.g., cell–cell interaction, microbial consortium, molecular interaction), and gene editing tools (CRISPR, TALEN, and ZFN; Jaiswal et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021). The present study suggests that the insect-associated bacteria and their exogenous enzymes have potential applications in plastic biodegradation, and can offer a promising approach for plastic waste management.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the degradation of polyurethane by the HY-72 strain.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.

Author contributions

J-HK, K-HS, and H-YP participated in acquiring the data and the study design, drafted the manuscript, and revised the final manuscript. SHC performed the experiments and analyzed the data. MGP and DHP participated in study protocol design and supplied samples. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported by the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) Research Initiative Program (KGM5492221).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

References

Alabi, O. A., Ologbonjaye, K. I., Awosolu, O., and Alalade, O. E. (2019). Public and environmental health effects of plastic wastes disposal: a review. J Toxicol Risk Assess 5, 1–13. doi: 10.23937/2572-4061.1510021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alshehrei, F. (2017). Biodegradation of synthetic and natural plastic by microorganisms. J Appl Environ Microbiol 5, 8–19. doi: 10.12691/jaem-5-1-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Álvarez-Barragán, J., Domínguez-Malfavón, L., Vargas-Suárez, M., González-Hernández, R., Aguilar-Osorio, G., and Loza-Tavera, H. (2016). Biodegradative activities of selected environmental fungi on a polyester polyurethane varnish and polyether polyurethane foams. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5225–5235. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01344-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amobonye, A., Bhagwat, P., Singh, S., and Pillai, S. (2021). Plastic biodegradation: frontline microbes and their enzymes. Sci. Total Environ. 759:143536. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atanasova, N., Stoitsova, S., Paunova-Krasteva, T., and Kambourova, M. (2021). Plastic degradation by extremophilic bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:5610. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Banerjee, S., Maiti, T. K., and Roy, R. N. (2021). Enzyme producing insect gut microbes: an unexplored biotechnological aspect. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 42, 384–402. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1942777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., and Barlaz, M. (2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1985–1998. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bayer, O. (1947). Das di-isocyanat-polyadditionsverfahren (polyurethane). Angew. Chem. 59, 257–272. doi: 10.1002/ange.19470590901

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berasategui, A., Shukla, S., Salem, H., and Kaltenpoth, M. (2016). Potential applications of insect symbionts in biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 1567–1577. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7186-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhagobaty, R. K., and Joshi, S. R. (2012). Enzymatic activity of fungi endophytic on five medicinal plant species of the pristine sacred forests of Meghalaya, India. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 17, 33–40. doi: 10.1007/s12257-011-0453-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biffinger, J. C., Barlow, D. E., Cockrell, A. L., Cusick, K. D., Hervey, W. J., Fitzgerald, L. A., et al. (2015). The applicability of Impranil® DLN for gauging the biodegradation of polyurethanes. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 120, 178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.06.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bilal, H., Raza, H., Bibi, H., and Bibi, T. (2021). Plastic biodegradation through insects and their symbionts microbes: a review. J Bioresour Manag 8, 95–103. doi: 10.35691/JBM.1202.0206

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dillon, R. J., and Dillon, V. M. (2004). The gut bacteria of insects: nonpathogenic interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49, 71–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123416

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gautam, R., Bassi, A. S., Yanful, E. K., and Cullen, E. (2007). Biodegradation of automotive waste polyester polyurethane foam using pseudomonas chlororaphis ATCC55729. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 60, 245–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.03.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gómez, E. F., Luo, X., Li, C., Michel, F. C. Jr., and Li, Y. (2014). Biodegradability of crude glycerol-based polyurethane foams during composting, anaerobic digestion and soil incubation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 102, 195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, R., Gupta, N., and Rathi, P. (2004). Bacterial lipases: an overview of production, purification and biochemical properties. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 64, 763–781. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1568-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heo, S. Y., Kwak, J. Y., Oh, H. W., Park, D. S., Bae, K. S., Shin, D. H., et al. (2006). Characterization of an extracellular xylanase in Paenibacillus sp. HY-8 isolated from an herbivorous longicorn beetle. J Microbio Biotechnol 16, 1753–1759.

Google Scholar

Howard, G. T. (2002). Biodegradation of polyurethane: a review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 49, 245–252. doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00051-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Howard, G. T., Norton, W. N., and Burks, T. (2012). Growth of Acinetobacter gerneri P7 on polyurethane and the purification and characterization of a polyurethanase enzyme. Biodegradation 23, 561–573. doi: 10.1007/s10532-011-9533-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hung, C. S., Zingarelli, S., Nadeau, L. J., Biffinger, J. C., Drake, C. A., Crouch, A. L., et al. (2016). Carbon catabolite repression and Impranil polyurethane degradation in pseudomonas protegens strin Pf-5. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 6080–6090. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01448-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ignatyev, I. A., Thielemans, W., and Vander Beke, B. (2014). Recycling of polymers: a review. Chem Sus Chem 7, 1579–1593. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201300898

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jaiswal, S., Sharma, B., and Shukla, P. (2020). Integrated approaches in microbial degradation of plastics. Environ. Technol. Innov. 17:100567. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100567

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jang, S., and Kikuchi, Y. (2020). Impact of the insect gut microbiota on ecology, evolution, and industry. Curr Opin Insect Sci 41, 33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2020.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Javed, S., Azeem, F., Hussain, S., Rasul, I., Siddique, M. H., Riaz, M., et al. (2018). Bacterial lipases: a review on purification and characterization. Prog Biophys Mol Bio 132, 23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.07.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, S., Nadir, S., Dong, Y., Schaefer, D. A., Mortimer, P. E., Gui, H., et al. (2020). Biodegradation of polyester polyurethane by aspergillus flavus G10. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.25.170654

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Bio Evol 35, 1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. M., Kim, H. R., Jeon, E., Yu, H. C., Lee, S., Li, J., et al. (2020). Evaluation of the biodegradation efficiency of four various types of plastics by Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the gut extract of superworms. Microorganisms 8:1341. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liaqat, S., Hussain, M., Malik, M. F., Aslam, A., and Mumtaz, K. (2020). Microbial ecology: a new perspective of plastic degradation. Pure Appl Biol 9, 2138–2150. doi: 10.19045/bspab.2020.90228

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., He, J., Xue, R., Xu, B., Qian, X., Xin, F., et al. (2021). Biodegradation and up-cycling of polyurethanes: Progress, challenges, and prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 48:107730. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loredo-Treviño, A., Gutiérrez-Sánchez, G., Rodríguez-Herrera, R., and Aguilar, C. N. (2012). Microbial enzymes involved in polyurethane biodegradation: a review. J. Polym. Environ. 20, 258–265. doi: 10.1007/s10924-011-0390-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahajan, N., and Gupta, P. (2015). New insights into the microbial degradation of polyurethanes. RSC Adv. 5, 41839–41854. doi: 10.1039/C5RA04589D

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magnin, A., Pollet, E., Phalip, V., and Avérous, L. (2020). Evaluation of biological degradation of polyurethanes. Biotechnol. Adv. 39:107457. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107457

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McKenna, S. T., and Hull, T. R. (2016). The fire toxicity of polyurethane foams. Fire Sci Rev 5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40038-016-0012-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukherjee, K., Tribedi, P., Chowdhury, A., Ray, T., Joardar, A., Giri, S., et al. (2011). Isolation of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain from soil that can degrade polyurethane diol. Biodegradation 22, 377–388. doi: 10.1007/s10532-010-9409-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakajima-Kambe, T., Shigeno-Akutsu, Y., Nomura, N., Onuma, F., and Nakahara, T. (1999). Microbial degradation of polyurethane, polyester polyurethanes and polyether polyurethanes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 51, 134–140. doi: 10.1007/s002530051373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osman, M., Satti, S. M., Luqman, A., Hasan, F., Shah, Z., and Shah, A. A. (2018). Degradation of polyester polyurethane by aspergillus sp. strain S45 isolated from soil. J. Polym. Environ. 26, 301–310. doi: 10.1007/s10924-017-0954-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pellizzi, E., Lattuati-Derieux, A., Lavédrine, B., and Cheradame, H. (2014). Degradation of polyurethane ester foam artifacts: chemical properties, mechanical properties and comparison between accelerated and natural degradation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 107, 255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, Y. H., Shih, Y. H., Lai, Y. C., Liu, Y. Z., Liu, Y. T., and Lin, N. C. (2014). Degradation of polyurethane by bacterium isolated from soil and assessment of polyurethanolytic activity of a pseudomonas putida strain. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 9529–9537. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-2647-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Lara, L. F., Vargas-Suárez, M., López-Castillo, N. N., Cruz-Gómez, M. J., and Loza-Tavera, H. (2016). Preliminary study on the biodegradation of adipate/phthalate polyester polyurethanes of commercial-type by Alicycliphilus sp. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 133. doi: 10.1002/APP.42992

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roy, R., Mukherjee, G., Das, G. A., Tribedi, P., and Sil, A. K. (2021). Isolation of a soil bacterium for remediation of polyurethane and low-density polyethylene: a promising tool towards sustainable cleanup of the environment. Biotechnology 11, 29. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02592-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruiz, C., Main, T., Hilliard, N. P., and Howard, G. T. (1999). Purification and characterization of two polyurethanase enzymes from pseudomonas chlororaphis. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 43, 43–47. doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(98)00067-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Russell, J. R., Huang, J., Anand, P., Kucera, K., Sandoval, A. G., Dantzler, K. W., et al. (2011). Biodegradation of polyester polyurethane by endophytic fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 6076–6084. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00521-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salgado, C. A., de Almeida, F. A., Barros, E., Baracat-Pereira, M. C., Baglinière, F., and Vanetti, M. C. D. (2021). Identification and characterization of a polyurethanase with lipase activity from Serratia liquefaciens isolated from cold raw cow's milk. Food Chem. 337:127954. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127954

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt, J., Wei, R., Oeser, T., Dedavid, E., Silva, L. A., Breite, D., et al. (2017). Degradation of polyester polyurethane by bacterial polyester hydrolases. Polymers 9:65. doi: 10.3390/polym9020065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seneviratne, G., Tennakoon, N., Weerasekara, M., and Nandasena, K. (2006). Polyethylene biodegradation by a developed Penicillium–bacillus biofilm. Curr. Sci. 90, 20–21.

Google Scholar

Shah, Z., Gulzar, M., Hasan, F., and Shah, A. A. (2016). Degradation of polyester polyurethane by an indigenously developed consortium of pseudomonas and bacillus species isolated from soil. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 134, 349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, S. K., Ko, Y. J., Lee, M. E., You, S. K., Hyeon, J. E., and Han, S. O. (2021). Enhanced production of polyhydroxybutyrate from syngas by using nanoscaled cellulose particles with a syngas-converting enzyme complex immobilized on Ralstonia eutropha. J. Clean. Prod. 285:124903. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124903

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spontón, M., Casis, N., Mazo, P., Raúd, B., Simonetta, A., Rios, L., et al. (2013). Biodegradation study by pseudomonas sp. of flexible polyurethane foams derived from castor oil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 85, 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.05.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sudakaran, S., Retz, F., Kikuchi, Y., Kost, C., and Kaltenpoth, M. (2015). Evolutionary transition in symbiotic syndromes enabled diversification of phytophagous insects on an imbalanced diet. ISME J. 9, 2587–2604. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Utomo, R. N. C., Li, W. J., Tiso, T., Eberlein, C., Doeker, M., Heipieper, H. J., et al. (2020). Defined microbial mixed culture for utilization of polyurethane monomers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 17466–17474. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vandooren, J., Geurts, N., Martens, E., Van den Steen, P. E., and Opdenakker, G. (2013). Zymography methods for visualizing hydrolytic enzymes. Nat. Methods 10, 211–220. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vargas-Suárez, M., Fernández-Cruz, V., and Loza-Tavera, H. (2019). Biodegradation of polyacrylic and polyester polyurethane coatings by enriched microbial communities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103, 3225–3236. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09660-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Xin, X., Shi, X., and Zhang, Y. (2020). A polystyrene-degrading Acinetobacter bacterium isolated from the larvae of Tribolium castaneum. Sci. Total Environ. 726:138564. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S. S., Wu, W. M., Brandon, A. M., Fan, H. Q., Receveur, J. P., Li, Y., et al. (2018). Ubiquity of polystyrene digestion and biodegradation within yellow mealworms, larvae of Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Chemosphere 212, 262–271. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Yang, Y., Wu, W. M., Zhao, J., and Jiang, L. (2014). Evidence of polyethylene biodegradation by bacterial strains from the guts of plastic-eating waxworms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 13776–13784. doi: 10.1021/es504038a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Yang, J., Wu, W. M., Zhao, J., Song, Y., Gao, L., et al. (2015). Biodegradation and mineralization of polystyrene by plastic-eating mealworms: part 2. Role of gut microorganisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 12087–12093. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, C. F., Xu, Y., and Zhou, N. Y. (2020). Biodegradation of polyethylene mulching films by a co-culture of Acinetobacter sp. strain NyZ450 and bacillus sp. strain NyZ451 isolated from Tenebrio molitor larvae. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 155:105089. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105089

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: polyurethane, polyurethanase, biodegradation, insect-associated microbe, Serratia, plastic waste management

Citation: Kim J-H, Choi SH, Park MG, Park DH, Son K-H and Park H-Y (2022) Polyurethane biodegradation by Serratia sp. HY-72 isolated from the intestine of the Asian mantis Hierodula patellifera. Front. Microbiol. 13:1005415. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1005415

Received: 29 July 2022; Accepted: 02 December 2022;
Published: 19 December 2022.

Edited by:

Jie Wang, China Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by:

Martin Koller, University of Graz, Austria
Vasudeo Zambare, University of Technology Malaysia, Malaysia

Copyright © 2022 Kim, Choi, Park, Park, Son and Park. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kwang-Hee Son, sonkh@kribb.re.kr; Ho-Yong Park, hypark@kribb.re.kr

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.