Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 21 October 2022
Sec. Microbiotechnology

Co-fermented yellow wine lees by Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium regulates growth performance and gut microbiota in finishing pigs

Yu Zhang,,,Yu Zhang1,2,3,4Cheng Wang,,,Cheng Wang1,2,3,4Weifa Su,,,Weifa Su1,2,3,4Zipeng Jiang,,,Zipeng Jiang1,2,3,4Huan He,,,Huan He1,2,3,4Tao Gong,,,Tao Gong1,2,3,4Lixia Kai,,,Lixia Kai1,2,3,4Huangen Xu,,,Huangen Xu1,2,3,4Yizhen Wang,,,Yizhen Wang1,2,3,4Zeqing Lu,,,
Zeqing Lu1,2,3,4*
  • 1National Engineering Research Center for Green Feed and Healthy Breeding, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • 4Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Feed Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Fermented yellow wine lees (FYWL) are widely used to increase feed utilization and improve pig performance. Based on the preparation of co-FYWL using Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of co-FYWL on growth performance, gut microbiota, meat quality, and immune status of finishing pigs. 75 pigs were randomized to 3 treatments (5 replicates/treatment), basal diet (Control), a basal diet supplemented with 4%FYWL, and a basal diet supplemented with 8%FYWL, for 50 days each. Results showed that the 8% FYWL group significantly reduced the F/G and increased the average daily weight gain of pigs compared to the control group. In addition, 8% FYWL improved the richness of Lactobacillus and B. subtilis in the gut, which correlated with growth performance, serum immune parameters, and meat quality. Furthermore, acetate and butyrate in the feces were improved in the FYWL group. Simultaneously, FYWL improved the volatile flavor substances of meat, increased the content of flavor amino acids, and played a positive role in the palatability of meat. In addition, FYWL increased serum IgA, IgM, IL-4 and IL-10 levels. Overall, the growth performance, the gut microbiota associated with fiber degradation, meat quality, and immune status were improved in the 8% FYWL group.

Introduction

There is a shortage of feed resources in China, but the output of yellow distiller grains is enormous (Hu et al., 2014; Yao et al., 2021). Due to improper using, resources are wasted (Li et al., 2013). Yellow wine lees are rich in crude protein (Yao et al., 2018). The residual soluble dietary fiber in the production of yellow rice wine can be used as an energy source for livestock and poultry (Wang et al., 2010), but its amino acid composition is unbalanced. Therefore, in recent years, researchers have adopted probiotic fermentation to improve the nutritional status of the feed. Studies have shown that feeding probiotic fermented diets can improve growth performance, feed conversion, nutritional digestion and gut health of finishing pigs (Thu et al., 2011).

Yellow wine lees are rich in dietary fiber (Choi et al., 2013). The prebiotics that are most often researched include dietary fiber (Gamage et al., 2018). The hindgut microbiota frequently ferment dietary fiber to produce microbial metabolites, including volatile fatty acids (VFA) (Tremaroli and Bäckhed, 2012; Slavin, 2013; Janssen and Kersten, 2015). Lactobacillus can improve blood biochemistry and antioxidant status as well as absorption of nutrients (Dowarah et al., 2018). Animals given Lactobacillus FT28 have been shown to have greater villi height and crypt depth, indicating better nutritional use by the organism (Joysowal et al., 2018). Probiotics produce lactic acid, which forms an acidic environment that inhibits the growth of mold in fermented feed (FF) and prevents nutrient loss from secondary fermentation (Yang et al., 2006). Bacillus subtilis dietary supplementation enhances antioxidant capacity, immunological status, and growth performance, boosts SCFA synthesis, and regulates the gut microbiota (Ruiz Sella et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021).

Therefore, in this experiment, yellow wine lees, one of the new alternative feed materials, and bran were used as fermentation substrates to prepare mixed feed through co-fermentation with B. subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of new mixed fermented diets on growth performance, meat quality, immune status and gut microbiota of finishing pigs.

Materials and methods

Fermented mixed feed preparation

B. subtilis ZJU12 (China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center NO:12852) was isolated from pickled vegetables. Enterococcus faecium was isolated from the laboratory of Zhejiang University. FYWL was carried out in Kesheng Feed Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, PR of China. 80% of yellow wine lees, and 20% of bran compose up a basic substrate, ending up with 35% per moisture content in sterile water. B. subtilis ZJU12 (3 × 108 cfu/g) and E. faecium (1 × 108 cfu/g) were added to the mixed substrate and fermented in a FF bag with a one-way exhaust valve at 30°C for 72 h. The nutritional composition analysis of the UFYWL and FYWL is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The chemical analysis of the UFYWL and FYWL.

Experimental animals and experimental design

All steps were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Zhejiang University. Seventy-five fattened pigs (Duroc × Long White × Large White) with an average initial weight of 89.59 ± 1.30 kg were randomly divided into three treatment groups. Each treatment consisted of five replicates per group, with five pigs per replicate. The three treatments were the control group on the basal diet and the experimental group with 4% or 8% FYWL. Six pigs were selected from each treatment after 50 days slaughtered to determine carcass and meat quality. The diets in the experiment followed NRC (2012). The composition and nutritional value of the diets are shown in Table 2. Feed and water were provided ad libitum throughout the experiment.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The composition and nutritional content of the diet.

Growth performance

Feed was recorded daily and pigs were weighed on the first and last day of the experiment. Average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed/gain ratio (F/G) were then calculated.

Sample collection

Six pigs in each group were randomly selected and fasting for 16 hours before slaughter on the same day, and blood was collected. Then the serum was separated and stored at −80°C. Samples of the longest dorsal muscle (LM) were collected to determine pork quality, amino acids, Inosine-5′-monophosphate, alcohol, aldehyde, and ketone. Fresh feces were collected daily for 5 days before slaughter, part of which was stored at −20°C to determine the apparent digestibility of nutrients, and part of which was stored at −80°C for determining SCFA.

Chemical analysis

According to the AOAC International recommendations, the fodder was evaluated for CP, ether extract, NDF, ADF, Ca, and total P. The endogenous indicator method was used to determine the contents of crude protein, crude fat, calcium, phosphorus and crude fiber in feces (Verschuren et al., 2021). The feces used to measure SCFA were filtered and determined by capillary GC after filtering (GC-2010 plus; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) (Yang et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2022). Observe the intestinal morphology with hematoxylin and eosin staining (Cao et al., 2019) by transmission electron microscopy.

Inosine-5′-monophosphate was measured according to the method of Lee et al. (2017). The determination of alcohol, aldehyde, and ketone was carried out with HS-SPME-GC–MS (Li et al., 2022). And the pretreatment and determination of amino acids were performed according to the method of “Determination of amino acids in food” (GB/T 5009.124–2003). pH values of meat were measured using a pH meter. a*, b*, and L* of samples from the different pigs were measured using a colorimeter. To determine drip loss, meat was measured by using EZ-DripLoss method (Huang et al., 2020).

The levels of serum IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 were measured according to the instructions using the pig source assay kit (Jiangsu Meibiao Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu P.R. China). SOD, GSH-Px, CAT, MDA, and T-AOC were detected by using commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the instructions.

Microbial analysis of feces

FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals Ltd., United States) was used to extract the total genomic DNA from the feces samples. The V3-V4 gene region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primers 338F (5’-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). A PCR was performed at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 27 cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 45 s, and single extension at 72°C for 10 min, and 10°C until halted by the user. PCR products were then extracted, purified and quantified. Purified amplicons were collected and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, United States). The raw reads were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (Accession Number: PRJNA860351). At last, the data were processed using the QIIME package (V1.7.0).1

Statistical analysis

All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 19.0 software. One-way ANOVA and Duncan test were used to determine the mean difference. At p < 0.05, the difference between treatments was significant. Bar graphs were generated in GraphPad Prism 7.

Results

The chemical analysis of the UFYWL and FYWL

Table 1 shows the nutritional content of UFYWL and FYWL. FYWL had the higher content of CP, TCA-SP and P compared to the UFYWL, which were 20.66, 76.81 and 12.28% higher than that of UFYWL, respectively.

Effects of supplementation with FYWL on the growth performance of finishing pigs

Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in ADFI and ADG among the groups (p > 0.05), but FYWL group tended to increase the average daily gain and daily feed intake, and the 8% FYWL group markedly reduced F/G (p < 0.05; Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Effects of supplementation with FYWL (4 and 8%) on the growth performance in finishing pigs.

Effect of FYWL on digestibility and intestinal morphology of finishing pigs

As shown in Figure 1A, the addition of FF to the diet was beneficial in improving the nutrient digestibility of pigs, and the FYWL improved the apparent nutrient digestibility of crude protein, crude fat, calcium, phosphorus and crude fiber. Among them, the apparent digestibility of crude protein, crude fat, calcium, and crude fiber was best improved by adding 8% FYWL to the diet compared with the control group. AS shown in Figures 1BD, we can visually see the villi height and crypt depth. From Figures 1E,F, it can be seen that the FYWL group can significantly improve the villi height and the ratio of villus height to crypt depth, and there was no significant difference between the 4% FYWL and 8% FYWL.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Nutrient digestibility and jejunal morphology. (A) Effect of fermented feed on the apparent digestibility of intestinal nutrients in fattening pigs, CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; CF, crude fiber. (B–D) Pig intestine stained with H&E. (E,F) Effect of fermented feed on the length of intestinal villi and depth of crypt in finishing pigs. *, **, and *** represented significant differences (p < 0.05), (p < 0.01) and (p < 0.001) from indicated control groups, respectively.

Effect of FYWL on gut microbiota of finishing pigs

Three groups of pig manure were sequenced to achieve Good’s coverage of 0.99 (Figure 2A), suggesting that the sequencing depth is sufficient for microbiological structural analysis. To explore the diversity of the microbial community, we examined α-diversity indices at the species level. The results showed that the control group was significantly less abundant than the 8% FYWL (Wilcoxon rank-sum test p < 0.05; Figure 2A). In addition, the FYWL showed a tendency to increase in the Ace index, Chao1 index, and Shannon index. This suggests that FYWL may increase the gut microbial diversity in pigs. Venn (Figure 2B) shows the shared and specific OUTs of different groups. The unique OUT numbers of the control group, the 4%FYWL and the 8% FYWL, were 17, 25 and 33, respectively, and the number of common OUTs of the three groups is 770. To understand differences in microbial composition between the three groups, we calculated Bray-Curtis distances at the species level in each sample group as part of the β-diversity measures. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) (Figure 2C) revealed significant differences between the three groups. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) analysis also showed that the microbial composition of the different groups was significantly different (p < 0.05).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Diversity and composition of microbiota in different groups. (A) Column of α diversity indices of bacterial community based on 16S rRNA sequencing. (B) Venn diagram. (C) Principal co-ordinates (PCoA) analyzes.

At the phylum level and genus level, the microbial composition differed between treatment groups (Figure 3). Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Spirochaete are the dominant microflora of fattening pigs. Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, Terrisporobacter, norank_f__Muribaculaceae, and Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group decreased. Figure 3C shows that the FYWL group increased the abundance of Fibrobacterota (p < 0.05), Figure 3D showed that Lactobacillales, Prevotella, Coprococcus, Bacilli, dgA-11 gut group, Bacteroides, Sphaerochaeta, and Negativibacillus (p < 0.05) abundances. We performed LDA coupled with effect size (LEfSe) on the taxa with LDA scores greater than 2.5, and the results are shown in Figure 3E. The most influential bacterial group structure in the Control was Turicibacter, Eubacterium_coprostanoligenes, and Escherichia-Shigella, The most influential genera on the 4% FYWL were Phascolarctobacterium, streptococcus-hyointestinalis,prevotellaceae, Rikenellaceae, dgA-11 gut group, Prevotellaceae UCG 003, Bacteroides, Alloprevotella, Sphaerochaeta, Parabacteroides. The most influenced by the 8% FYWL group was Lactobacillus_amylovorus, Lactobacillales, Prevotella, Frisingicoccus, Bacilli, Treponema_porcinum.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Effect of different feeds on the relative abundance of different bacterial species. (A) Phylum-level of the bacterial community in feces. (B) Genus-level of the bacterial community in feces. (C) Phylum-level in Kruskal–Wallis H. (D), Genus-level in one-way ANOVA. (E) Linear discriminant analysis LDA scores (>2.5) were computed for features. Letters represented the taxonomy of the bacteria: p, phylum, c, class; o, order; f, family; g, genus.

Effect of FYWL on faecal SCFAs of finishing pigs

The content of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the feces is shown in Table 4. 8% FYWL group had significantly higher acetic acid and butyric acid content than the Control (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, propionate, isobutyrate, valerate, and isovalerate have an increasing trend in the FYWL group.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Effect of FYWL on content of SCFA.

Effects of FYWL on the meat quality of finishing pigs

The 8% FYWL group significantly improved the marbling score, meat color score, a* (p < 0.05). There was also a facilitation effect on the loin eye muscle area. FYWL had a significant increase in intramuscular fat (p < 0.05) and inosine-5′-monophosphate content (p < 0.05) compared to the control group (Table 5).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Effect of FYWL on meat quality of finishing pig.

The content of amino acids in muscle, especially flavor amino acids, such as Asp., Pro, Glu, Gly, Thr, Ser and Ala, was closely related to the flavor of the meat. As shown in Table 6, 8%FYWL was the most effective for the improvement of flavor and indispensable amino acids in muscle. The changes in volatile flavor substances are shown in Supplementary Material. In comparison, pigs fed FYWL showed an improvement in volatile flavor compounds. Specifically, the addition of 8% FYWL to the feed significantly increased the content of aldehydes such as hexanal, heptanal, acetaldehyde (p < 0.05), and significantly increased the content of (E)-3-octen-2-ol, cis-menthyl-2,8-dienol (p < 0.05), and 2-pentylfuran (p < 0.05). The experimental results showed that 8% FYWL had a better enhancement effect on the enhancement of volatile flavor substances.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Effect of FYWL on amino acid content of meat.

Effects of FYWL on serum antioxidant ability and immunity of finishing pigs

Compared to the control group, T-AOC, GSH-Px, and CAT activities were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the pigs fed 8% FYWL, and MDA content was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the pigs fed 8% FYWL (Table 7).

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. Effects of FYWL on serum antioxidant ability of finishing pigs.

For serum immunity (Table 8), FYWL significantly increased the level of IL-4. The level of IL-6 was significantly decreased (p < 0.05). Serum indicators were measured to assess serum immunoglobulin concentration. Differences in IgG levels between the groups were not significant, but IgA and IgM were significantly increased in 8% FYWL group (p < 0.05).

TABLE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. Effect of FYWL on serum immunity.

Spearman’s correlation among gut microbiota, meat quality, serum index, and SCFA

Analysis of Spearman correlation to study the relationship among gut microbiota, meat quality, serum index, and SCFA (Figure 4). Lactobacillus, which was enriched in the 8% FYWL group and positively correlated with intramuscular fat, IL-10, meat color score, lgG, IL-4, butyrate, propionate, isobutyrate (p < 0.05), was positively related to valerate, acetate (p < 0.01) and was a negative correlation with IL-6 (p < 0.05). Prevotella enriched in FYWL was positively correlated with lgM, IL-4, a* (p < 0.05), and negatively with IL-6 (p < 0.05). On the contrary, Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiracea, and Eubacterium coprostanoligenes were abundant in control group. Ruminococcaceae, and Lachnospiraceae had a passive correlation with valerate, butyrate, acetate, propionate (p < 0.05). Interestingly, Eubacterium coprostanoligenes were negatively correlated with butyrate, acetate, and propionate (p < 0.05).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Spearman’s correlation among gut microbiota, serum index, meat quality and SCFAs. * and ** represented significant differences (p < 0.05) and (p < 0.01) from indicated control groups, respectively.

Discussion

In this study, yellow wine lees (YWL) co-fermented by B. subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis could regulate growth performance, intestinal flora, meat quality, and immune status of finishing pigs. Interestingly, the beneficial effect of 8% FYWL was superior to 4% FYWL. YWL is the main by-product of yellow rice wine industry, and carbohydrates can be used as an important energy source for microorganisms. Its amino acid composition is unbalanced, and improper treatment of residual alcohol may cause intestinal diseases in animals. The fermentation of probiotics improved the crude protein and polypeptide content of YWL with high efficiency. The results showed that FYWL contained more proteins and TCA-SP compared to YWL. Crude protein, acid-soluble protein, ANF, and pH are important indicators to assess the nutritional value of feeds. TCA-SP are easily available in the intestine and have antioxidant and immunomodulatory functions (Gilbert et al., 2008). Degradation of macromolecular proteins, including antigenic proteins, leads to an increase in TCA-SP. Carbohydrates are used by probiotics leading to an increase in bacterial protein is the main reason for triggering an increase in crude protein in FFs, B. subtilis secretes proteases to degrade macromolecular proteins leading to an increase in TCA-SP. Our results showed that FYWL contained more CP and TCA-SP than UFYWL. In addition, B. subtilis can also secrete cellulase, hemicellulase and xylanase to increase soluble dietary fiber in feeds. Overall, the synergistic fermentation of bacteria and enzymes improves protein quality by degrading anti-nutritional factors and fiber, which in turn enhances the nutritional value of feeds. It helps to improve the digestibility of nutrients in animals.

One study noted that due to the enrichment of probiotics on the surface and inside the feed and the secretion of extracellular enzymes or organic acids by probiotics, this change is more favorable for the digestive enzymes to work and improve the nutrient utilization of the animal (Xie et al., 2021). Fiber digestibility in pigs is mainly derived from the hindgut flora, and it has been reported that pigs provided with 19.10% dietary fiber contained higher intestinal microbial richness. At the genus level, compared with the control group, the number and types of several fiber-degrading bacteria related to carbohydrate metabolism and energy metabolism increased (Pu et al., 2020). In addition, fiber induced an increase in fiber-degrading bacteria, promoting VFA metabolism, which may help Suhuai pigs grow. It has been suggested that dietary corn bran may improve the growth performance of pigs by increasing butyrate production. Specifically, the Lactobacillus in fermented yellow wine lees promote butyric acid production and increase feed utilization efficiency (Lin et al., 2020; Direkvandi et al., 2021).

The increase in the ratio of villus height to crypt depth indicates that the digestion and absorption of nutrients in the small intestine are enhanced. The results of this study suggest that fermented wine lees can improve intestinal morphology, increase the height of intestinal villi and decrease the depth of the crypt, thus increasing the villi to crypt ratio. This also explains one of the reasons for the increased digestibility in the FYWL group (Hedemann et al., 2003). Bacteria capable of producing SCFAs were found to be beneficial in improving the efficiency of feed utilization. Meanwhile, the contribution of cellulosic bacteria to SCFA is significant and will increase the efficiency of feed utilization by the host.

It was found that the more bacteria capable of producing SCFA, the higher the efficiency of feed utilization (Tan et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Quan et al., 2018). The FF can improve animal health, intestinal morphology and immunity (Sun et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Suda et al., 2021) by affecting intestinal flora, so we also measured intestinal flora to investigate the potential causes affecting the apparent indicators of pigs.

The sobs index showed a significant increase in gut microbial diversity in the 8% FYWL. The increase in microbial diversity contributed to the improvement of the intestinal condition. The low pH and probiotics from FYWL prevented pathogenic infections and improved the gut health (Missotten et al., 2015). The results of the LEFSe analysis showed that Bacteria capable of digesting fibers in the control group included the genus Ruminiclostridium (Wang et al., 2021). The abundance of Ruminococcus was positively correlated with TNF-α, a common pro-inflammatory factor. Previous studies have shown that enrichment of this family is associated with inflammation of the colonic mucosa (Willing et al., 2010). The 4% FYWL was significantly enriched with Prevotella and Phascolarctobacterium. Prevotella can degrade mucin (Wright et al., 2000; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga et al., 2017), has a growth-promoting effect on the organism, and is capable of producing SCFAs (Li et al., 2020). This bacterium is usually associated with fiber-rich feeds (Wu et al., 2011). Phascolarctobacterium was positively associated with acetic acid, propionic acid and total VFA production and it has synergistic effect with fiber degradation. The 8% FYWL was significantly enriched with Lactobacillus amylovorus, Lactobacillales and Bacilli. L. amylovorus can effectively utilize dietary fiber and oligosaccharides, and its metabolites help prevent pathogenic bacteria-induced damage to the intestinal barrier (Trevisi et al., 2018). The increased abundance of Lactobacillus can effectively regulate the intestinal microbiota and reduce pH. FYWL can effectively prevent pathogenic infections by lowering pH (Missotten et al., 2015). The increase in the abundance of Lactobacillus can effectively regulate the immune system. Also, the massive proliferation of beneficial bacteria can competitively adhere to intestinal mucosal cells and reduce the chances of pathogenic bacteria colonization (Valeriano et al., 2017). With the use of probiotic FFs, many studies have demonstrated the promotion effect of B. subtilis on animal growth performance (Bader et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2012; Chen and Yu, 2020), and even more, studies have demonstrated the improvement of growth performance under heat stress and immune stress (Musa et al., 2019; Sokale et al., 2019; Abdelqader et al., 2020). In line with this result, our study demonstrated that the addition of B. subtilis was effective in increasing ADG, ADFI and decreasing F/G, which was related to B. subtilis metabolites such as extracellular digestive enzymes and antifungal proteins (Kim et al., 2004; Sahu et al., 2008). Adding B. subtilis to the feed also enhances the immunity (Dong et al., 2020; Guo M. et al., 2020) and improves the metabolic function of the intestine (Xu et al., 2018; Rodrigues et al., 2020). Serum immunoglobulins, especially IgA, IgG, and IgM, usually respond to the immune status of the organism (Balan et al., 2019). In agreement with previous studies (Fazelnia et al., 2021), the levels of IgA and IgM were markedly increased in the experimental group supplemented with B. subtilis. This reflects the enhanced immune function of the organism.

Some researchers have indicated that Lactobacillales can improve the carcass quality and physicochemical properties, sensory attributes (juiciness and appearance) of pork. Animals given P. acidilactici FT28 showed higher total ash and CP percentages in their meat (P < 0.05) (Joysowal et al., 2018). Some studies have shown that animals treated with Bacillus sp. The meat gets higher protein and amino acid content, which is consistent with our findings (Musa et al., 2019). It has been reported that feeding FF can improve meat color, which is consistent with our experimental results (Guo S. et al., 2020). Muscle fat content is important for evaluating the various sensory qualities of meat, such as tenderness, flavor and juiciness (Hocquette et al., 2010; Van Elswyk and McNeill, 2014). FYWL affects finishing pigs’ meat quality by influencing the muscle’s fat deposition (Yin et al., 2017). A study applied to finishing pigs had similar results to ours. The article effectively improved meat quality through SCFA supplementation and verified that SCFA improves carcass traits and meat quality in pigs by regulating fat metabolism (Zhang et al., 2011; Jiao et al., 2021).

Serum immunoglobulins are important immunoreactive molecules. The results of this study showed that the levels of IgA and IgM were markedly higher in the FYWL group compared to the control group. FYWL with B. subtilis was effective in increasing the level of immunoglobulins and decreasing the level of pro-inflammatory factors. This is consistent with the previous results (Xu et al., 2021). In addition, it has been reported that dietary fiber improves the immune performance by regulating the secretion of butyric acid to inhibit the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors and promote the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors. Compared to control, pigs supplemented with FYWL in this study observed increased serum levels of IL-4, and IL-10. The reduction in IL-6 suggests FYWL may reduce inflammatory responses without antibiotics. FYWL improves immunity by SCFAs in the FYWL group, especially acetate and butyrate (Parada Venegas et al., 2019; Luu et al., 2020). Butyrate can act by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines. There is ample evidence that many bacteria present in the intestinal tract of animals are effective in improving feed utilization and enhancing the immune capacity of the organism (Corrigan et al., 2015; Waite and Taylor, 2015; Best et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). It has been noted that due to the degradation of fiber by intestinal microorganisms to produce butyrate, it can indeed enhance the intestinal barrier through the HIF-1 and AMPK signaling pathways thereby (Peng et al., 2009; Kelly et al., 2015). Oxidative stress is a state of imbalance between antioxidants and free radicals that can generate various reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body. Excess ROS can damage biological macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids and produce large amounts of MDA, eventually leading to tissue damage and disease development. At this time, SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT are produced accordingly in the body to remove redundant ROS and maintain the body’s health (Cao et al., 2021). Some studies have shown that probiotic fermentation could increase the content of small peptides, which are substances with antioxidant properties and can improve antioxidant capacity and free radical scavenging capacity, thus affecting the serum antioxidant capacity of finishing pigs. In conclusion, the fermentation of yellow wine lees can increase immunity and serum antioxidant capacity in finishing pigs.

Spearman’s correlation analysis further showed that Lactobacillus was significantly associated with immunity, meat quality, and SCFAs in greater numbers. Specifically, the Lactobacillus in fermented yellow wine lees promote butyric acid production (Berni Canani et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2020) and regulate butyric acid metabolism to improve immunity (Hao et al., 2021). It has been shown that the flora can alleviate intestinal inflammation by upregulating IL-22 production through the breakdown of dietary fiber to produce butyrate by activating HIF-1α (Yang et al., 2020). Consistent with this finding, butyrate levels were increased in this experiment, while inflammatory cytokine were downregulated. A growing body of evidence suggests that dietary fiber improves immune performance by regulating butyrate secretion to reduce the secretion of inflammatory cytokine and increase the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokine (Liu et al., 2021). Several papers have confirmed the benefits of propionate and butyrate on ADFI or ADG in pigs (Lu et al., 2012), which is consistent with our findings. Contrary to our results, oral administration of butyrate reduced feed intake and decreased ADG in mice (Li et al., 2018), and this difference may be due to differences in animal models and health status. Intramuscular fat, meat color score, and a* are common indicators to evaluate carcass traits. In agreement with our results, butyrate supplementation was beneficial in improving body lipid content (Mátis et al., 2019) and carcass traits in fattened pigs (Sun et al., 2020). Spearman correlation analysis suggests that dietary fiber from fermented yellow wine lees may improve immune function, meat quality, and body health of fattened pigs through butyrate metabolism.

In short, the FYWL diet shapes the microbiota associated in the colon. These microorganisms, in turn, have a positive impact on the antioxidant, immune and meat quality of the organism.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that co-FFs of B. subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis improved the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, serum antioxidant capacity, immune status and meat quality of finishing pigs. These beneficial results may be regulated by the phylum Fibrobacter, Lactobacillus and SCFAs. This provides a theoretical basis for the application of FF on finishing pigs.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Zhejiang University.

Author contributions

YZ: investigation, data curation, and writing-original draft. CW: research and writing–original draft. WS: visualization and investigation. ZJ: supervision. TG: resources and formal analysis. HH: validation. LK: software. HX: resources. YW: supervision, funding acquisition, methodology, software, and writing—review and editing. ZL: conceptualization, supervision, and writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data were supported by the fund from Science and Technology Projects of Zhejiang (2022C02043, 2021C02008, and CTZB-2020080127), China Agriculture Research System (CARS-35), and National Center of Technology Innovation for Pigs, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation no. 2022M712796.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1003498/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

FF, Fermented feed; UFYWL, Unfermented yellow wine lees; FYWL, Fermented yellow wine lees; EE, Ether extract; AA, Amino acid; CP, Crude protein; TCA-SP, Trichloroacetic acid soluble protein; CF, Crude fiber; ADF, Acid detergent fiber; NDF, Neutral detergent fiber; AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists; SOD, The activities of superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, Glutathione peroxidase; CAT, Catalase; MDA, Malonaldehyde; T-AOC, Total antioxidant capacity.

Footnotes

References

Abdelqader, A., Abuajamieh, M., Hayajneh, F., and al-Fataftah, A. R. (2020). Probiotic bacteria maintain normal growth mechanisms of heat stressed broiler chickens. J. Therm. Biol. 92:102654. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bader, J., Albin, A., and Stahl, U. (2012). Spore-forming bacteria and their utilisation as probiotics. Benef. Microbes 3, 67–75. doi: 10.3920/BM2011.0039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Balan, P., Sik-Han, K., and Moughan, P. J. (2019). Impact of oral immunoglobulins on animal health-a review. Anim. Sci. J. 90, 1099–1110. doi: 10.1111/asj.13258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berni Canani, R., Sangwan, N., Stefka, A. T., Nocerino, R., Paparo, L., Aitoro, R., et al. (2016). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-supplemented formula expands butyrate-producing bacterial strains in food allergic infants. ISME J. 10, 742–750. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Best, A. A., Porter, A. L., Fraley, S. M., and Fraley, G. S. (2016). Characterization of gut microbiome dynamics in developing Pekin ducks and impact of management system. Front. Microbiol. 7:2125. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02125

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, G., Tao, F., Hu, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Deng, B., et al. (2019). Positive effects of a clostridium butyricum-based compound probiotic on growth performance, immune responses, intestinal morphology, hypothalamic neurotransmitters, and colonic microbiota in weaned piglets. Food Funct. 10, 2926–2934. doi: 10.1039/C8FO02370K

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Y., Yang, L., Qiao, X., Xue, C., and Xu, J. (2021). Dietary astaxanthin: an excellent carotenoid with multiple health benefits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1–27. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1983766

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y. C., and Yu, Y. H. (2020). Bacillus licheniformis-fermented products improve growth performance and the fecal microbiota community in broilers. Poult. Sci. 99, 1432–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, Y. S., Park, K. S., Kim, H. W., Hwang, K. E., Song, D. H., Choi, M. S., et al. (2013). Quality characteristics of reduced-fat frankfurters with pork fat replaced by sunflower seed oils and dietary fiber extracted from makgeolli lees. Meat Sci. 93, 652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corrigan, A., de Leeuw, M., Penaud-Frézet, S., Dimova, D., and Murphy, R. A. (2015). Phylogenetic and functional alterations in bacterial community compositions in broiler ceca as a result of mannan oligosaccharide supplementation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 3460–3470. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04194-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, J., Mueller, N. T., Corrales-Agudelo, V., Velásquez-Mejía, E. P., Carmona, J. A., Abad, J. M., et al. (2017). Metformin is associated with higher relative abundance of Mucin-degrading Akkermansia muciniphila and several short-chain fatty acid-producing microbiota in the gut. Diabetes Care 40, 54–62. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Direkvandi, E., Mohammadabadi, T., Dashtizadeh, M., Alqaisi, O., and Salem, A. Z. M. (2021). Lactobacillus plantarum as feed additive to improvement in vitro ruminal biofermentation and digestibility of some tropical tree leaves. J. Appl. Microbiol. 131, 2739–2747. doi: 10.1111/jam.15129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, Y., Li, R., Liu, Y., Ma, L., Zha, J., Qiao, X., et al. (2020). Benefit of dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis BYS2 on growth performance, immune response, and disease resistance of broilers. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 12, 1385–1397. doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09643-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dowarah, R., Verma, A. K., Agarwal, N., Singh, P., and Singh, B. R. (2018). Selection and characterization of probiotic lactic acid bacteria and its impact on growth, nutrient digestibility, health and antioxidant status in weaned piglets. PLoS One 13:e0192978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fazelnia, K., Fakhraei, J., Yarahmadi, H. M., and Amini, K. (2021). Dietary supplementation of potential probiotics Bacillus subtilis, bacillus licheniformis, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Synbiotic improves growth performance and immune responses by modulation in intestinal system in broiler chicks challenged with salmonella Typhimurium. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 13, 1081–1092. doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09737-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gamage, H. K. A. H., Tetu, S. G., Chong, R. W. W., Bucio-Noble, D., Rosewarne, C. P., Kautto, L., et al. (2018). Fiber supplements derived from sugarcane stem, wheat dextrin and Psyllium husk have different in vitro effects on the human gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 9:1618. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbert, E. R., Wong, E. A., and Webb, K. E. (2008). Board-invited review: peptide absorption and utilization: implications for animal nutrition and health. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 2135–2155. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0826

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, M., Li, M., Zhang, C., Zhang, X., and Wu, Y. (2020). Dietary Administration of the Bacillus subtilis enhances immune responses and disease resistance in chickens. Front. Microbiol. 11:1768. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, S., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Q., Xv, J., Hou, Y., Wu, X., et al. (2020). Partial substitution of fermented soybean meal for soybean meal influences the carcass traits and meat quality of broiler chickens. Animals (Basel) 10:225. doi: 10.3390/ani10020225

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, F., Tian, M., Zhang, X., Jin, X., Jiang, Y., Sun, X., et al. (2021). Butyrate enhances CPT1A activity to promote fatty acid oxidation and iTreg differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014681118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hedemann, M. S., Højsgaard, S., and Jensen, B. B. (2003). Small intestinal morphology and activity of intestinal peptidases in piglets around weaning. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 87, 32–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0396.2003.00405.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hocquette, J. F., Gondret, F., Baéza, E., Médale, F., Jurie, C., and Pethick, D. W. (2010). Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal 4, 303–319. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109991091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Y., Pan, L., Dun, Y., Peng, N., Liang, Y., and Zhao, S. (2014). Conversion of yellow wine lees into high-protein yeast culture by solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 28, 843–849. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.962407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Y., Zhou, L., Zhang, J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Cai, L., et al. (2020). A large-scale comparison of meat quality and intramuscular fatty acid composition among three Chinese indigenous pig breeds. Meat Sci. 168:108182. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Janssen, A. W., and Kersten, S. (2015). The role of the gut microbiota in metabolic health. FASEB J. 29, 3111–3123. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-269514

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiao, A., Diao, H., Yu, B., He, J., Yu, J., Zheng, P., et al. (2021). Infusion of short chain fatty acids in the ileum improves the carcass traits, meat quality and lipid metabolism of growing pigs. Anim. Nutr. 7, 94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joysowal, M., Saikia, B. N., Dowarah, R., Tamuly, S., Kalita, D., and Choudhury, K. B. D. (2018). Effect of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici FT28 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, health status, meat quality, and intestinal morphology in growing pigs. Vet. World 11, 1669–1676. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1669-1676

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelly, C. J., Zheng, L., Campbell, E. L., Saeedi, B., Scholz, C. C., Bayless, A. J., et al. (2015). Crosstalk between microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids and intestinal epithelial HIF augments tissue barrier function. Cell Host Microbe 17, 662–671. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, Y., Cho, J. Y., Kuk, J. H., Moon, J. H., Cho, J. I., Kim, Y. C., et al. (2004). Identification and antimicrobial activity of phenylacetic acid produced by bacillus licheniformis isolated from fermented soybean. Chungkook-Jang. Curr. Microbiol. 48, 312–317. doi: 10.1007/s00284-003-4193-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. J., Choe, J., Kim, K. T., Oh, J., Lee, D. G., Kwon, K. M., et al. (2017). Analysis of low-marbled Hanwoo cow meat aged with different dry-aging methods. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci 30, 1733–1738. doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y. J., Chen, X., Kwan, T. K., Loh, Y. W., Singer, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2020). Dietary fiber protects against diabetic nephropathy through short-chain fatty acid-mediated activation of G protein-coupled receptors GPR43 and GPR109A. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 31, 1267–1281. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019101029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Geng, W., Haruna, S. A., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., Ouyang, Q., et al. (2022). Identification of characteristic volatiles and metabolomic pathway during pork storage using HS-SPME-GC/MS coupled with multivariate analysis. Food Chem. 373:131431. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Jiao, A., Wei, B., Wang, Y., Wu, C., Jin, Z., et al. (2013). Porous starch extracted from Chinese rice wine vinasse: characterization and adsorption properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 61, 156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Li, H., Xie, P., Li, Z., Yin, Y., Blachier, F., et al. (2019). Dietary supplementation with fermented Mao-tai lees beneficially affects gut microbiota structure and function in pigs. AMB Express 9:26. doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0747-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Yi, C. X., Katiraei, S., Kooijman, S., Zhou, E., Chung, C. K., et al. (2018). Butyrate reduces appetite and activates brown adipose tissue via the gut-brain neural circuit. Gut 67, 1269–1279. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Zhou, H., Pan, X., Xu, T., Zhang, Z., Zi, X., et al. (2017). Cassava foliage affects the microbial diversity of Chinese indigenous geese caecum using 16S rRNA sequencing. Sci. Rep. 7:45697. doi: 10.1038/srep45697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, R., Sun, Y., Mu, P., Zheng, T., Mu, H., Deng, F., et al. (2020). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG supplementation modulates the gut microbiota to promote butyrate production, protecting against deoxynivalenol exposure in nude mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 175:113868. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, B., Yan, J., Zhong, Z., and Zheng, X. (2020). A study on the preparation of microbial and nonstarch polysaccharide enzyme synergistic fermented maize cob feed and its feeding efficiency in finishing pigs. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020:8839148. doi: 10.1155/2020/8839148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Bian, G., Sun, D., Zhu, W., and Mao, S. (2017). Starter feeding supplementation alters colonic mucosal bacterial communities and modulates mucosal immune homeostasis in newborn lambs. Front. Microbiol. 8:429. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00429

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Yan, H., Lv, L., Xu, Q., Yin, C., Zhang, K., et al. (2012). Growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens supplemented with bacillus licheniformis in drinking water. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 25, 682–689. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Zhu, X., Cui, Y., Wang, W., Liu, H., Li, Z., et al. (2021). Consumption of dietary fiber from different sources during pregnancy alters sow gut microbiota and improves performance and reduces inflammation in sows and piglets. mSystems 6:e00591-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00591-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, H., Su, S., and Ajuwon, K. M. (2012). Butyrate supplementation to gestating sows and piglets induces muscle and adipose tissue oxidative genes and improves growth performance. J. Anim. Sci. 90, 430–432. doi: 10.2527/jas.53817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luu, M., Monning, H., and Visekruna, A. (2020). Exploring the molecular mechanisms underlying the protective effects of microbial SCFAs on intestinal tolerance and food allergy. Front. Immunol. 11:1225. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mátis, G., Petrilla, J., Kulcsár, A., van den Bighelaar, H., Boomsma, B., Neogrády, Z., et al. (2019). Effects of dietary butyrate supplementation and crude protein level on carcass traits and meat composition of broiler chickens. Arch Anim Breed 62, 527–536. doi: 10.5194/aab-62-527-2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Missotten, J. A., Michiels, J., Degroote, J., and de Smet, S. (2015). Fermented liquid feed for pigs: an ancient technique for the future. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 6:4. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-6-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Musa, B. B., Duan, Y., Khawar, H., Sun, Q., Ren, Z., Elsiddig Mohamed, M. A., et al. (2019). Bacillus subtilis B21 and bacillus licheniformis B26 improve intestinal health and performance of broiler chickens with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 103, 1039–1049. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parada Venegas, D., de la Fuente, M. K., Landskron, G., González, M. J., Quera, R., Dijkstra, G., et al. (2019). Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front. Immunol. 10:277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, L., Li, Z. R., Green, R. S., Holzman, I. R., and Lin, J. (2009). Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Nutr. 139, 1619–1625. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.104638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pu, G., Li, P., du, T., Niu, Q., Fan, L., Wang, H., et al. (2020). Adding appropriate fiber in diet increases diversity and metabolic capacity of distal gut microbiota without altering fiber digestibility and growth rate of finishing pig. Front. Microbiol. 11:533. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quan, J., Cai, G., Ye, J., Yang, M., Ding, R., Wang, X., et al. (2018). A global comparison of the microbiome compositions of three gut locations in commercial pigs with extreme feed conversion ratios. Sci. Rep. 8:4536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22692-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigues, D. R., Briggs, W., Duff, A., Chasser, K., Murugesan, R., Pender, C., et al. (2020). Cecal microbiome composition and metabolic function in probiotic treated broilers. PLoS One 15:e0225921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruiz Sella, S. R. B., Bueno, T., de Oliveira, A. A. B., Karp, S. G., and Soccol, C. R. (2021). Bacillus subtilis natto as a potential probiotic in animal nutrition. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 41, 355–369. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2020.1858019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sahu, M. K., Swarnakumar, N. S., Sivakumar, K., Thangaradjou, T., and Kannan, L. (2008). Probiotics in aquaculture: importance and future perspectives. Indian J. Microbiol. 48, 299–308. doi: 10.1007/s12088-008-0024-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Slavin, J. (2013). Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients 5, 1417–1435. doi: 10.3390/nu5041417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sokale, A. O., Menconi, A., Mathis, G. F., Lumpkins, B., Sims, M. D., Whelan, R. A., et al. (2019). Effect of Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 on the intestinal structural integrity and growth performance of broiler chickens under necrotic enteritis challenge. Poult. Sci. 98, 5392–5400. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suda, Y., Sasaki, N., Kagawa, K., Elean, M., Zhou, B., Tomokiyo, M., et al. (2021). Immunobiotic feed developed with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii TUA4408L and the soymilk by-product Okara improves health and growth performance in pigs. Microorganisms 9:921. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9050921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, W., Sun, J., Li, M., Xu, Q., Zhang, X., Tang, Z., et al. (2020). The effects of dietary sodium butyrate supplementation on the growth performance, carcass traits and intestinal microbiota of growing-finishing pigs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128, 1613–1623. doi: 10.1111/jam.14612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Zhou, L., Fang, L., Su, Y., and Zhu, W. (2015). Responses in colonic microbial community and gene expression of pigs to a long-term high resistant starch diet. Front. Microbiol. 6:877. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00877

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, Z., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Xing, K., Zhang, F., Zhao, X., et al. (2017). Metagenomic analysis of Cecal microbiome identified microbiota and functional capacities associated with feed efficiency in landrace finishing pigs. Front. Microbiol. 8:1546. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thu, T. V., Loh, T. C., Foo, H. L., Yaakub, H., and Bejo, M. H. (2011). Effects of liquid metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, faeces characteristics, intestinal morphology and diarrhoea incidence in postweaning piglets. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43, 69–75. doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9655-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tremaroli, V., and Bäckhed, F. (2012). Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489, 242–249. doi: 10.1038/nature11552

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trevisi, P., Priori, D., Jansman, A. J. M., Luise, D., Koopmans, S. J., Hynönen, U., et al. (2018). Molecular networks affected by neonatal microbial colonization in porcine jejunum, luminally perfused with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, F4ac fimbria or Lactobacillus amylovorus. PLoS One 13:e0202160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valeriano, V. D., Balolong, M. P., and Kang, D. K. (2017). Probiotic roles of Lactobacillus sp. in swine: insights from gut microbiota. J. Appl. Microbiol. 122, 554–567. doi: 10.1111/jam.13364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Elswyk, M. E., and McNeill, S. H. (2014). Impact of grass/forage feeding versus grain finishing on beef nutrients and sensory quality: the U.S. experience. Meat Sci. 96, 535–540. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verschuren, L. M. G., Schokker, D., Bergsma, R., van Milgen, J., Molist, F., Calus, M. P. L., et al. (2021). Variation in faecal digestibility values related to feed efficiency traits of grower-finisher pigs. Animal 15:100211. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100211

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waite, D. W., and Taylor, M. W. (2015). Exploring the avian gut microbiota: current trends and future directions. Front. Microbiol. 6:673. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00673

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Nan, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., and Xiong, B. (2021). Ruminal degradation of rumen-protected glucose influences the Ruminal microbiota and metabolites in early-lactation dairy cows. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87:e01908-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01908-20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z. G., Pan, X. J., Zhang, W. Q., Peng, Z. Q., Zhao, R. Q., and Zhou, G. H. (2010). Methionine and selenium yeast supplementation of the maternal diets affects antioxidant activity of breeding eggs. Poult. Sci. 89, 931–937. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00268

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Willing, B. P., Dicksved, J., Halfvarson, J., Andersson, A. F., Lucio, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2010). A pyrosequencing study in twins shows that gastrointestinal microbial profiles vary with inflammatory bowel disease phenotypes. Gastroenterology 139, 1844.e1–1854.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wright, D. P., Rosendale, D. I., and Robertson, A. M. (2000). Prevotella enzymes involved in mucin oligosaccharide degradation and evidence for a small operon of genes expressed during growth on mucin. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 190, 73–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09265.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, G. D., Chen, J., Hoffmann, C., Bittinger, K., Chen, Y. Y., Keilbaugh, S. A., et al. (2011). Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 334, 105–108. doi: 10.1126/science.1208344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, J., Liu, S., Dong, R., Xie, J., Chen, Y., Peng, G., et al. (2021). Bound polyphenols from insoluble dietary fiber of defatted Rice bran by solid-state fermentation with Trichoderma viride: profile, activity, and release mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 5026–5039. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, S., Lin, Y., Zeng, D., Zhou, M., Zeng, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2018). Bacillus licheniformis normalize the ileum microbiota of chickens infected with necrotic enteritis. Sci. Rep. 8:1744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20059-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Y., Yu, Y., Shen, Y., Li, Q., Lan, J., Wu, Y., et al. (2021). Effects of Bacillus subtilis and bacillus licheniformis on growth performance, immunity, short chain fatty acid production, antioxidant capacity, and cecal microflora in broilers. Poult. Sci. 100:101358. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101358

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Huang, X., Fang, S., He, M., Zhao, Y., Wu, Z., et al. (2017). Unraveling the fecal microbiota and metagenomic functional capacity associated with feed efficiency in pigs. Front. Microbiol. 8:1555. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01555

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Lyu, W., Lu, L., Shi, X., Li, N., Wang, W., et al. (2020). Biogeography of microbiome and short-chain fatty acids in the gastrointestinal tract of duck. Poult. Sci. 99, 4016–4027. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H. Y., Wang, X. F., Liu, J. B., Gao, L. J., Ishii, M., Igarashi, Y., et al. (2006). Effects of water-soluble carbohydrate content on silage fermentation of wheat straw. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101, 232–237. doi: 10.1263/jbb.101.232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, W., Yu, T., Huang, X., Bilotta, A. J., Xu, L., Lu, Y., et al. (2020). Intestinal microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids regulation of immune cell IL-22 production and gut immunity. Nat. Commun. 11:4457. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18262-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, K., Jiang, L., Liu, J., Wang, D., Liu, H., and Ren, D. (2021). Effect of yellow wine lees supplementation on Milk antioxidant capacity and hematological parameters in lactating cows under heat stress. Animals (Basel) 11:2643. doi: 10.3390/ani11092643

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, K. Y., Zhang, T. Z., Wang, H. F., and Liu, J. X. (2018). Upgrading of by-product from beverage industry through solid-state fermentation with Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 67, 557–563. doi: 10.1111/lam.13078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, J., Li, Y., Zhu, X., Han, H., Ren, W., Chen, S., et al. (2017). Effects of long-term protein restriction on meat quality, muscle amino acids, and amino acid transporters in pigs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65, 9297–9304. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02746

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W. H., Gao, F., Zhu, Q. F., Li, C., Jiang, Y., Dai, S. F., et al. (2011). Dietary sodium butyrate alleviates the oxidative stress induced by corticosterone exposure and improves meat quality in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 90, 2592–2599. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, G., Xiang, Y., Wang, X., Dai, B., Zhang, X., Ma, L., et al. (2022). Exploring the possible link between the gut microbiome and fat deposition in pigs. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022:1098892. doi: 10.1155/2022/1098892

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: fermented feed, finishing pigs, growth performance, gut microbiota, meat quality, immune status

Citation: Zhang Y, Wang C, Su W, Jiang Z, He H, Gong T, Kai L, Xu H, Wang Y and Lu Z (2022) Co-fermented yellow wine lees by Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium regulates growth performance and gut microbiota in finishing pigs. Front. Microbiol. 13:1003498. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1003498

Received: 26 July 2022; Accepted: 23 September 2022;
Published: 21 October 2022.

Edited by:

Graciela Gonzalez-Gil, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia

Reviewed by:

Hongkui Wei, Huazhong Agricultural University, China
Shengyu Xu, Sichuan Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Wang, Su, Jiang, He, Gong, Kai, Xu, Wang and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zeqing Lu, zqlu2012@zju.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.