Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 06 October 2021
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology

Ammonia Oxidizing Prokaryotes Respond Differently to Fertilization and Termination Methods in Common Oat’s Rhizosphere

  • 1Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina
  • 2Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS), Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)-CONICET, Bahía Blanca, Argentina
  • 3Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, United States
  • 4Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina

Cover crops (CC) have demonstrated beneficial effects on several soil properties yet questions remain regarding their effects on soil microbial communities. Among them, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) have a key role for N cycling in soil and their responses in the rhizosphere of terminated CC deserve further investigation. A greenhouse experiment was established to assess N fertilization (with or without N) and termination methods (glyphosate, mowing, and untreated control) of common oat (Avena sativa L.) as potential drivers of AOA and AOB responses in the rhizosphere. The abundance of amoA genes was determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), the community structure was assessed with Illumina amplicon sequencing of these genes, while the function was assessed from potential nitrification activity (PNA). While N fertilization had no influence on AOA, the termination method significantly increased amoA gene copies of AOA in mowed plants relative to glyphosate termination or the untreated control (1.76 and 1.49-fold change, respectively), and shifted AOA community structure (PERMANOVA, p<0.05). Ordination methods indicated a separation between AOA communities from control and glyphosate-terminated plants relative to mowed plants for both UniFrac and Aitchison distance. Converserly, N fertilization significantly increased AOB abundance in the rhizosphere of mowed and control plants, yet not in glyphosate-treated plants. Analyses of community structure showed that AOB changed only in response to N fertilization and not to the termination method. In line with these results, significantly higher PNA values were measured in all fertilized samples, regardless of the termination methods. Overall, the results of this study indicated that bacterial and archaeal nitrifiers have contrasting responses to fertlization and plant termination methods. While AOA were responsive to the termination method, AOB were more sensitive to N additions, although, the stimulative effect of N fertilization on amoAAOB abundance was dependent on the termination method.

Introduction

One of the biggest challenges of modern agriculture is the production of enough high-quality food, while reducing the environmental impact and the dependence on external inputs. In this context, cover crops (CCs) have gained popularity as a sustainable alternative with demonstrated beneficial effects on several soil properties (Lu et al., 2000; Chavarría et al., 2016). CCs are defined as crops grown between periods of normal crop production as an alternative to bare soil in fallow months, to provide soil protection and soil improvement (Soil Science Society of America, 1997). The termination of the CC growth is required to allow planting of the cash crop and includes both mechanical (e.g., rolling or mowing) and chemical methods (Lu et al., 2000). In no-tillage crop production, chemical killing by herbicides is the conventional approach and the broad spectrum and non-selective herbicide glyphosate (N-[phosphonomethyl]glycine) is one of the most used herbicides to achieve this purpose (Fageria et al., 2005). To fully assess the contribution of CC to sustainable agriculture, a broader and deeper view is required considering the several factors involved in this agricultural practice. In particular, how CC management practices affect soil microbial communities and their functions has been comparatively less studied than the influence of more traditional agricultural practices on soil microorganisms.

Several studies have investigated the effects of CC on soil microbiology, reporting increases in soil microbial biomass (King and Hofmockel, 2017), evenness of bacterial taxa (Li et al., 2012), and microbial enzymatic activities (Chavarría et al., 2016). A recent meta-analysis by Kim et al. (2020) covering 60 studies globally, reported that CC significantly increased soil microbial abundance, activity and diversity. At the same time, the study concluded that CC effect sizes varied by agricultural covariates such as the CC termination method. The latter is particularly relevant during the post-CC termination period as CC and their residues, including roots and their associated microbial communities, are keystones in the regulation of nutrient availability for the subsequent cash crops through decomposition processes (Frank and Groffman, 2009; Sievers and Cook, 2018).

The effect of the termination method and its interaction with fertilizers have never been explored in the rhizosphere of a CC. Although, CC are used to capture leachable nitrates in the soil, non-leguminous CC are usually supplied with “starter” N fertilizer due to their high response to external N inputs (Ridley, 2012). After CC termination, above and below-ground plant material starts decomposing. Cash crops planted at or around CC termination will be influenced by the N pool in the soil resulting from both ammonification and ammonia-oxidation processes (Kuo et al., 1997; Sievers and Cook, 2018). Thus, the differences in the structure and activity of microbial communities between mechanically suppressed and chemically desiccated CC could translate into differences in N availability for the following crop. This study is focused on functionally specialized groups that have a key role in the N cycle such as ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA). Ammonia oxidizers perform the first and rate-limiting step of nitrification, through the oxidation of ammonia derived from both inorganic fertilization and the mineralization of organic matter (Levičnik-Höfferle et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2020). These nitrifiers exhibit niche and physiological differentiation: while low ammonium supply from mineralization of organic matter favors growth and activity of AOA, AOB prefer high ammonium supply from inorganic fertilizer inputs (Stopnišek et al., 2010; Levičnik-Höfferle et al., 2012). Hink et al. (2018) demonstrated that AOA successfully outcompete AOB when NH4+ is continuously supplied at a low rate in the soil through mineralization of native organic N, or when a slow-release fertilizer is used to supplement. Although, recent studies have provided evidences of the contribution of complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox) to nitrification in agricultural soils (Pjevac et al., 2017; Orellana et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019), we restricted our study to AOA and AOB as the most widely studied ammonia oxidizers in the rhizosphere.

Previous studies have focused on AOA and AOB as sensitive microbial indicators to disturbances (Ritz et al., 2009; Wessén and Hallin, 2011; Pereira e Silva et al., 2012), management practices (Bru et al., 2010), and even glyphosate applications (Zhang et al., 2018). Fewer studies have examined the effects of CC termination on nitrifying prokaryotes (Caliz et al., 2015; Romdhane et al., 2019). In a previous greenhouse study of CC termination methods, Allegrini et al. (2019) found a lower abundance of AOB and AOA in the rhizosphere of unfertilized common oat terminated with glyphosate compared to mechanical termination, yet activity, and diversity of ammonia oxidizers were not assessed. The authors also reported differences in the catabolic profiles of microbial communities between termination methods, most likely due to specific rhizodeposition patterns and root turnover rates in mowed and glyphosate-treated plants. Differences in the quality and quantity of root exudates between glyphosate-treated and control plants have been reported in several studies (Kremer et al., 2005). Glyphosate treated plants showed higher exudation of amino acids and carbohydrates relative to mowed plants, and faster necrosis of root tissue was observed at the microscopic level (Imparato et al., 2016).

Thus, based on the previous literature, we hypothesized that due to their described effects on rhizodeposition and root turnover, termination methods will ultimately affect AOB and AOA (alpha and beta diversity of communities, abundance, and activity) relative to the untreated controls, regardless of the fertilization treatment. We also hypothesized that inorganic N fertilization will favor AOB over AOA in the rhizosphere of oat, regardless of the termination method. The overall objective of this study was to assess the effects of CC termination methods and N fertilization as potential drivers of the prokaryotic ammonia oxidizers’ activity and diversity in the rhizosphere. The results will contribute to further our understanding of how the prokaryotic ammonia oxidizers respond to management strategies that are critical in sustainable agriculture.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Design

In March 2018, a composite soil sample (0–20cm) was collected from an experimental site at the Universidad Nacional del Sur Campus (38°41.64′ S, 62°14.46′ W) in Bahía Blanca (Argentina), to fill 5.5dm3 pots, each with 5.6kg of soil. The sample belongs to a well-drained Petrocalcic Paleustoll with 15years of A. sativa L. cropping history. Aldana and Carioni (2001) reported the following properties for this soil: sandy loam texture and bulk density 1.28gcm−3, while a soil analysis in 2018 indicated a pH(H2O) 7.6 (1:2.5 soil:water), organic matter 2.46%, extractable (Bray) P 7.1mgkg−1, N-NH4+ 13.3mgkg−1, N-NO3 9.1mgkg−1 and of total N 0.129%.

The greenhouse assay was conducted with A. sativa L. var. Cristal INTA. The experimental factors were fertilization level (with and without inorganic N fertilizer) and CC termination method (M: mowing, G: glyphosate, and U: untreated control) arranged as a 2 × 3 factorial in a completely randomized design, resulting in a total of six treatment–combinations, with four replicates (pots) per treatment. For glyphosate termination, the herbicide was applied as a commercial formulation (3lha−1, Eskoba Full II, Red Surcos, 662gl−1, monopotassium salt) using a knapsack sprayer. The total growth period from CC planting (April 3) to termination date was 92days (Z3.1 stage) with automatized irrigation twice a day during 5min through sprinklers. The N fertilizer (urea, 46% N) was surface applied at planting and tillering stage (day 76) at a total rate of 100kgNha−1. Untreated control pots were destructively sampled at the time of termination to collect rhizospheric soil of living roots. For the experimental units terminated with glyphosate and mowing, the soil was sampled 12days later, to collect rhizospheric soil of plants with notable desiccation symptoms. In all cases, loosely adhering soil was removed by gentle shaking of the root system to discard bulk soil, and the tightly adhering soil (rhizospheric soil) was removed by brushing the root system with sterile brushes, collected on sterile trays, and stored in sterile plastic bags (Yanai et al., 2003). The soil was stored at −80°C for DNA extraction and molecular analysis and at 4°C for assessment of PNA.

Potential Nitrification Activity

Nitrification rate was measured according to the potential nitrification assay described by Hart et al. (1994), with modifications in the slurry preparation (10-fold scaling, i.e., 1.5g of fresh soil in 10ml of reaction buffer) to adapt volumes and soil quantities to a microplate assay, similar to Hoffmann et al. (2007). PNA reaction buffer (0.3mM KH2PO4, 0.7mM K2HPO4, 0.05mM (NH4)2SO4, and 10mM KClO3) was freshly prepared on the same day in which soil slurries were incubated. The slurries were prepared in 125ml sterile flasks loosely capped with aluminum foil to reduce water evaporation while leaving enough space for aeration. Flasks were incubated in an orbital shaker (25°C, 180rpm in the dark) for 1h to achieve a homogeneous suspension, and, afterward, 1ml samples were taken at 0, 2, 4, 20, and 22h (Hart et al., 1994). Samples were centrifuged at 15,000rpm (RCF: 21,379×g, 4°C) in a Hermle Z32-HK microcentrifuge (Wehingen, Germany) and the supernatant was transferred to sterile 1.5ml tubes. The tubes were immediately frozen at −20°C.

Quantitative analysis of nitrite concentration was conducted in 96-wells, polypropylene, flat-bottom microplates (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany, reference number: 0030 602.102) according to the diazotization method (Griess reaction) with sulfanilic acid (0.8% w/v in acetic acid; reference number: B1550261, Laboratorios Britania S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina) and N-(1-Naphthyl)ethylenediamine 2HCl 0.1% w/v in acetic acid (CarbosynthTM, Compton, United Kingdom). Absorbance was measured at 540nm and 25°C in a FLUOstar Optima microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). The rate of production of nitrite was calculated by linear regression of solution concentration over time. After correction for soil moisture content of the soil and conversion to a soil dry weight (dw) basis, the potential nitrification activity (μgN-NO2 g−1 dw soil h−1) was calculated following Drury et al. (2006).

Assessment of Potential Nitrification Activity With Root Exudates

The collection of root exudates was done from mowed or glyphosate treated plants (unfertilized) with a solution of CaCl2, as described by Egle et al. (2003). Briefly, all mineral particles attached to the root system in each pot were removed with tap water and the roots were submerged in 100ml of collection solution (CaCl2 0.05mM, pH 5.5) for 1h. The liquid was discarded and the roots were submerged again in 50ml of the collection solution for 16h. The resulting exudate obtained in each case was centrifuged 10min at 13,000×g, filter-sterilized, lyophilized, and stored at −20°C. The lyophilized exudate from each pot was suspended in 10ml of PNA reaction buffer and immediately used to assess the effect on ammonia oxidation. Two pools of root exudates (one from glyphosate-terminated plants and one from mowed plants) were obtained by mixing equal quantities of exudates from each pot of the same treatment group.

To assess the effect of root exudates on nitrifying communities, soil samples (approximately 1.5g) from each of the four replicates (pots) collected at time zero (before termination) were divided into three portions (each about 0.4g) to prepare soil slurries with either root exudates collected from glyphosate-treated plants, root exudates collected from mowed plants, or soil slurries with the PNA reaction buffer (control). The reaction buffer and the conditions of incubation were as described previously except for the sampling times (0, 2, 20, 22, and 24h). Soil slurries were prepared by combining the soil samples with 9ml of reaction buffer and 1ml of root exudate, or soil samples with 10ml of PNA reaction buffer for the control flasks.

DNA Extraction and Quantification

DNA was extracted from 250mg of rhizospheric soil samples with the commercial kit PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer instructions. DNA was quantified using QuantiFluor dsDNA kit in a Quantus fluorometer (Promega, Promega, Madison, WI, United States). The quality of the DNA was assessed from 1% agarose gel and absorbance ratios (260:230 and 260:280nm ratio) in a DS-11 FX spectrophotometer (DeNovix Inc., Wilmington, DE, United States).

Quantitative PCR of amoA Gene

To study the treatment effects on the estimated abundance of AOB and AOA, a quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of amoA gene of each group was conducted (amoAAOB and amoAAOA, respectively). Primers used for AOA and AOB as well as their amplicon lengths are indicated in Supplementary Table S1. To avoid introducing errors (mainly related to an unknown number of operons per cell), we analyzed the copy numbers (Ouyang et al., 2016; Morrison et al., 2017); no attempt was made to convert these copies into cell numbers. The amplification program for AOB and AOA as well as the PCR master mix volumes and reaction setup were previously reported by Zabaloy et al. (2016) and Zabaloy et al. (2017), respectively. All amplifications, baseline corrections, melting curve analysis, and standard curve assessments were conducted in ABI 7500 Real−Time System and its associated software (7500 Software v2.0.3, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The equation of the standard curve for amoAAOB (Ct=39.084–3.881 log10 copy number) represented an assay efficiency of 81% with an R2 value of 0.993, while the equation for amoAAOA (Ct=33.55–3.76 log10 copy number) represented an efficiency of 84% with an R2 value of 0.996.

Amplicon Sequencing of amoA Gene

Three replicates of each treatment were analyzed by amplicon sequencing of amoA gene. Gene libraries were prepared with the primers amoA1F/amoA2R (amoAAOB) and CrenamoA23f/CrenamoA616r (amoAAOA; Supplementary Table S1), using the Fluidigm™ protocol at the DNA Service Laboratory, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center at University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign, United States). The library was quantitated by qPCR and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) using one MiSeq flowcell for 251cycles, from each end of the fragments. FASTQ files were generated and demultiplexed by the sequencing service with the bcl2fastq v2.20 Conversion Software (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States).

Bioinformatic Analysis of Amplicon Sequencing Data

The FASTQ files were processed in QIIME2 (Bolyen et al., 2019) using the recommended pipelines for paired-end reads (AOB) or single-end reads (AOA) based on DADA2 denoising algorithm. Briefly, primers were removed using p-trim-left argument within dada2 denoised-paired script (AOB) or within dada2 denoised-single script (AOA). For AOA, we used dada2 denoised-single script (i.e., only forward reads) considering that the length of the reads (300bp) was not enough for merging forward and reverse reads of the amplicon and, thus, a pipeline for paired reads would be inappropriate in this case. The trimming argument within dada2 denoised-paired script was set on 273bp for forward reads and 240 for reverse reads (median Q values >27 reported by Interactive Quality Plot tool of QIIME2), while a default value of 2 was set for the expected number of errors. For dada2 denoised-single, script we used the same expected number of errors, while no trimming was applied as the quality values were acceptable (median Q values >33). Single-ends analysis yields sequences that are inherently shorter than in paired-end analysis, thus a trimming step would shorten the length of the amplicon even further for taxonomic analysis.

The resulting amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were tabulated and the ASV table was rarefied to a value equal to the sum of reads of the sample with the lower number of reads. The rarefied data of ASV table was used in vegan package 2.5–7 (Oksanen et al., 2020) of R Statistical Software v4.1.0 (R Core Team, 2021) for calculation of the following alpha diversity metrics: Shannon diversity index (H′), observed richness (S′=number of ASVs), and Pielou’s evenness index (J’). The ASVs obtained after all processing steps (removal of primers, trimming and filtering, denoising, and chimera removal) were clustered into operative taxonomic units (OTUs) using qiime vsearch cluster-features-de-novo at the appropriate species-level identity threshold for amoA gene (90%; Ouyang et al., 2016), similarly to other studies (Ouyang et al., 2016; Lourenço et al., 2018). For calculation of UniFrac distances, the representative sequences of the resulting OTUs were then aligned using Muscle algorithm in MEGAX (Kumar et al., 2018) and the aligned sequences were loaded in phangorn v2.7.0 package (Schliep, 2011) of R Statistical Software v.4.1.0 to obtain the distance matrix and a neighbor-joining tree. The likelihood of this tree was computed (pml function) and then optimized (optim.pml) using the most appropriate model of nucleotide evolution according to the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC; Schliep, 2018). The phylogenetic tree and the OTU table were used in GUniFrac package v1.2 (Chen, 2021) of R Statistical Software v.4.1.0 to calculate generalized UniFrac distances.

Phylogenetic trees containing the OTU sequences and database sequences of amoA gene of AOB and AOA were constructed using maximum likelihood method with 1,000 bootstraps in MEGAX (Kumar et al., 2018). Tamura 3-parameter model and Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model were used for AOA and AOB, respectively, according to the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion of model selection. We used high-quality amoA sequences from FunGene database (Fish et al., 2013) also included by Lourenço et al. (2018), with a score above 350, a size greater than 200 amino acids in length, a hidden Markov model (HMM) coverage of more than 85%, and a defined organism. Additional sequences from members of Nitrosospira clusters 0, 2, and 4, also included in reported AOB phylogenetic trees of rhizospheric soil (Glaser et al., 2010), were included as well. For AOA, we used several amoA sequences from marine environment, soil, sediments, and the rhizosphere of Zea mays L., all previously used in the construction of phylogenetic trees of AOA (Park et al., 2006; He et al., 2007; Tourna et al., 2011; Yao et al., 2011; Ai et al., 2013). Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) tool was used for tree visualization (Letunic and Bork, 2016).

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted in R Statistical Software v.4.1.0 (R Core Team, 2021). Quantitative PCR data (copy number μg−1 DNA) and PNA values were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and least-square means procedure for post hoc multiple comparisons of means (α=0.05) after a log10 transformation in emmeans package v.1.6.1 (Lenth, 2021). The interaction term was considered significant at p<0.2 (Littell et al., 2002). The alpha-diversity metrics were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α=0.05) with the rarefied ASV table. The PNA in response to the addition of root exudates was analyzed using a linear mixed model in nlme package v3.1–152 (Pinheiro et al., 2021) considering the pot (replicate) from which soil was originally extracted as a random effect, and the treatment (glyphosate root exudate, mowing root exudate, or control buffer) as a fixed effect. Correlation analyses between the copy number of amoA genes and the PNA were performed using Pearson method (α=0.05) with cor.test function in base R.

Amplicon sequencing data was analyzed using both the standard approach as well as the compositional approach (Gloor and Reid, 2016; Gloor et al., 2017) using several packages of R Statistical Software v.4.1.0. In the first case, the UniFrac distances were used as input in vegan package v2.5–7 (Oksanen et al., 2020) for multivariate analysis of beta diversity through non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using metaMDS function. In the second case, centered log-ratio (clr) transformed data (Aitchison, 1986) was first calculated after replacing zero values with zCompositions package v.1.3.4 (Palarea-Albaladejo and Martin-Fernandez, 2015) and then used as input for principal component analysis (PCA) with PCA function (singular value decomposition) using FactoMineR package v.2.4 (Lê et al., 2008). The covariance biplots of compositional data were obtained using the packages FactoMineR, factoextra v.1.0.7 (Kassambara and Mundt, 2020), and ggplot2 v.3.3.3 (Wickham, 2016). The principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues larger than the average of all the eigenvalues (Kaiser-Guttman stopping rule) were retained (Jackson, 1993). The coordinates of the individuals in these components were used as input in a two-way ANOVA to assess the significance of fertilization and termination method on each component, with Tukey’s test (α=0.05) for post hoc multiple comparison of means with the emmeans package (Lenth, 2021).

In a complementary multivariate analysis, the generalized UniFrac distance and the Aitchison distance (i.e., Euclidean distance of clr-transformed data) were used as input in PERMANOVA (α=0.05; Anderson, 2001) with the adonis function (1,000 permutations) of vegan package v2.5–7 (Oksanen et al., 2020) to study the effects of the termination method, fertilization, and their interaction on community structure. When necessary, pairwise PERMANOVA were conducted with FDR p-value adjustment method in RVAideMemoire package v 0.9–80 (Hervé, 2021). The homogeneity of multivariate dispersions among treatments was visualized in vegan package v2.5–7 using betadisper function and a permutation test (α=0.05; 999 permutations).

Results

Quantitative PCR of amoA

A statistically significant main effect of the termination method (p<0.001) was detected for amoAAOA. Mowing resulted in a higher amoAAOA abundance in the rhizosphere compared to control plants (1.49-fold change, p<0.01), and to those terminated with glyphosate (1.76-fold change, p< 0.001). No significant differences were observed for amoAAOA between glyphosate termination and the untreated control (p>0.05; Table 1, Supplementary Figure S1). For the N fertilizer, a marginally significant main effect was observed (p= 0.06) with a higher copy number of amoAAOA detected in the rhizosphere of unfertilized plants relative to the fertilized plants (1.14-fold change, Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Quantitative PCR of amoA genes.

A differential response of amoAAOB to the addition of N fertilizer was observed in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated plants relative to the response observed in mowed or in untreated plants (p= 0.053 for the interaction term). While no N-induced stimulation of AOB was observed in glyphosate-treated plants, a significantly greater amoA copy number was observed after N fertilization in the rhizosphere of mowed and control plants relative to the unfertilized plants (p< 0.05; lower case letters, Table 1; Supplementary Figure S1). A 2.5 and 3.6-fold change was observed after fertilization in mowed and control plants, respectively (Table 1). When comparing among termination methods, a significantly lower abundance of amoAAOB was observed for glyphosate termination relative to both mowing and control within the fertilized condition (Table 1, upper case letters), a result that was not observed within the unfertilized condition.

Potential Nitrification Activity

A statistically significant main effect of N fertilization was observed for PNA (p<0.001). A greater ammonia oxidation activity was observed in N fertilized treatments, regardless of the termination method applied (Table 2). In contrast, termination method had no influence on this functional assay (p>0.05). Further, these results were consistent with the finding from the addition of root exudates from glyphosate-treated plants or mowed plants to soil slurries. The addition of exudates did not show a significant effect in the nitrifying response measured by PNA (p> 0.05; Supplementary Figure S2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Potential nitrification activity (PNA).

When analyzing abundance-activity correlations, a strong positive correlation was observed between PNA and amoAAOB copies (r=0.78, p< 0.001), while no significant correlation was observed between amoAAOA copy number and PNA showing a negative and weak correlation (r=−0.19, p> 0.05).

Amplicon Sequencing

The total number of amoAAOA and amoAAOB sequences in each sample after each step (filtering, denoising, and chimera removal) is shown in Supplementary Tables S2, S3, respectively. As shown in these tables, each step was conducted without removing a large number of reads, reflecting the high quality of the datasets. For AOA, a total of 216 ASVs were detected with a final length of 283bp. A total of 113 ASVs were obtained for AOB with a final length of 452nt. The amoAAOA and amoAAOB amplicon sequencing datasets have been deposited in Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository under the accession PRJNA701453. Rarefaction curves (Supplementary Figure S3) indicated that sequencing depth was enough to cover the full diversity of AOA and AOB, even at the rarefaction value (4,543 for AOA and 2,971 for AOB).

After clustering ASVs at the appropriate amoA identity threshold (90%), we obtained OTU tables for AOA (15 OTUs) and AOB (6 OTUs) with a considerably lower sparsity than the zero-enriched ASV tables, rendering them appropriate for further beta diversity analyses with multivariate methods and compositional data. The BLASTn search using the nucleotide database reported significant hits with amoA sequences of uncultured AOA (Supplementary Table S4) and uncultured AOB (Supplementary Table S5).

Alpha Diversity

For AOA, no significant differences were observed for any of the alpha-diversity metrics (p> 0.05) between N-fertilized and unfertilized plants or among termination methods (Supplementary Table S6). Statistically significant greater values of alpha diversity metrics were observed for AOB in the rhizosphere of N fertilized plants compared to the unfertilized (p= 0.003 for Shannon diversity index H′ and p= 0.013 for the observed richness S′), except for Pielou’s evenness index (J’; p= 0.19). Conversely, no significant differences among termination methods were observed for any of the parameters studied (p> 0.05, Supplementary Table S7).

Beta Diversity and Phylogenetic Analysis

The multivariate statistical analysis through PERMANOVA to investigate the beta diversity of AOA indicated no interaction between fertilization and the termination method (Table 3). A marginally significant effect of fertilization was detected on AOA communities when the dataset was analyzed under the standard approach with the phylogenetic distance (UniFrac), while no significant effect of fertilization was observed with Aitchison distance (p> 0.05, Table 3). Contrary to AOB, a statistically significant effect of the termination method was observed on the community structure of AOA (p< 0.05, Table 3) for both Aitchison distance and the UniFrac distance. Pairwise PERMANOVA indicated significant differences between communities of glyphosate-treated and mowed plants (FDR adjusted p= 0.04) or between mowed plants and the untreated control (FDR adjusted p= 0.04). No significant differences were detected between glyphosate and the untreated control (FDR adjusted p> 0.05), as visualized in NMDS analyses based on Aitchison distance (Figure 1) and generalized UniFrac distance (Supplementary Figure S4).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Beta-diversity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) communities.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using Aitchison distance (Stress=0.14, R2=0.98) for AOA. The SE of mowing termination, glyphosate termination, and untreated control is indicated with green, red and blue ellipses, respectively. The letter M in the labels of samples indicates mowing termination, letter G desiccation with glyphosate and letter U untreated control. Letter N indicates N fertilization and the number identifies the replicate of each treatment.

Principal component analysis of AOA (Figure 2) showed that the first two PCs explained 53.5% of the total variance of the dataset. A separation across PC1 was observed between communities of mowed plants and the other treatments (Figure 2), as previously observed in NMDS analyses (Figure 1). The two-way ANOVA with PCs as variables indicated no significant interaction and a statistically significant effect of termination method on PC1 (p< 0.05, Table 4). Pairwise comparisons revealed no differences between glyphosate termination and the untreated control, while mowing termination was significantly different from both treatments (p< 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test). While an interaction between fertilization and termination method was observed for PC2 (Table 4), no significant differences were detected between fertilized and unfertilized samples within each termination method, nor among termination methods within fertilized or unfertilized samples (p> 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test). The contributions of OTU5 and OTU6 to the ordination on PC1 were notably greater than the contributions of the other OTUs (53.5 and 35.8%, respectively). A positive correlation was observed between OTU5 and PC1, while a negative correlation with this component was detected for OTU6 (Table 4). As shown in the biplot, OTU5 was enriched in communities from glyphosate-treated or control plants and depleted in the rhizosphere of mowed plants, the opposite trend was observed for OTU6 (Figure 2). Further phylogenetic analyses (maximum likelihood tree, Figure 3) indicated that the sequence of responsive OTU5 is related to the amoA sequence of an uncultured AOA isolated from a suboxic soil (red label, Figure 3). No clustering with the other OTUs in this study or with amoA sequences from maize rhizosphere, bulk soil, or sediments was observed for OTU6 (green label, Figure 3).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Compositional biplot of AOA communities using centered log-ratio transformed data (Aitchison transformation). The letter M in the labels of samples indicates mowing termination, letter G desiccation with glyphosate and letter U untreated control. Letter N indicates N fertilization and the number identifies the replicate of each treatment.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Results of principal component analysis (PCA) for amoAAOA centered log-ratio transformed data.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of AOA with the 13 operative taxonomic units (OTUs) obtained after clustering amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) at 90% identity threshold. Green and red labels indicate OTUs highly correlated with PC1 in Figure 2. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura 3-parameter model (lowest Bayesian Information Criterion index, BIC) in MEGAX. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−3195.09) is shown. Bootstrap values (>65%) are shown at branch nodes. A discrete Gamma distribution was used [five categories (+G, parameter=0.9061)]. The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable [(+I), 46.46% sites]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 42 nucleotide sequences, including 13 OTUs and 29 database sequences. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated (partial deletion option). There were a total of 261 positions in the final dataset. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) tool was used for tree visualization.

For AOB, the statistical analysis of Aitchison and UniFrac distances through PERMANOVA indicated no interaction between fertilization and the termination method (p> 0.05, Table 3). N fertilization showed a marginally significant effect on the community structure of AOB for the Aitchison distance (Figure 4A) and a statistically significant effect for the phylogenetic distance (generalized UniFrac; Table 3 and Figure 4B). No significant effect of the termination method was detected on the community structure of AOB (PERMANOVA, p> 0.05, Table 3). The phylogenetic analysis of amoAAOB amplicons (maximum likelihood tree) showed most OTUs within the Nitrosospira cluster 3 (green and light green labels, Figure 5) and only one OTU (OTU4) closer to Nitrosospira cluster 0 (light blue label, Figure 5). No Nitrosomonas spp. were detected in the rhizosphere of A. sativa plants grown in this soil.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Non-metric multidimensional scaling of AOB using (A) Aitchison distance (Stress=0.13, R2=0.98; B) generalized UniFrac distance (Stress=0.08, R2=0.99). The SE of fertilized and unfertilized groups is indicated with red and black ellipses, respectively. The letter M in the labels of samples indicates mowing termination, letter G desiccation with glyphosate and letter U untreated control. Letter N indicates N fertilization and the number identifies the replicate of each treatment.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of AOB with the six OTUs obtained in this study after clustering ASVs at 90% identity (bold letter). The different Nitrosospira clusters commonly found in soil are indicated in colours (light blue: cluster 0; light purple: cluster 4; light red: cluster 2; light green: cluster 3b and green: cluster 3a). Nitrosomonas lineage is shown in gray. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model (lowest Bayesian Information Criterion index, BIC) in MEGAX. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−4633.71) is shown. Bootstrap values (>65%) are shown at branch nodes. A discrete Gamma distribution was used [five categories (+G, parameter=0.2979)]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. This analysis involved 50 nucleotide sequences. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated (partial deletion option). There were a total of 410 positions in the final dataset. iTOL tool was used for tree visualization.

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the effects of two CC-associated practices (N fertilization and termination method) in the rhizosphere of A. sativa L. to elucidate how ammonia oxidation and the involved prokaryotic players (AOA and AOB) respond to both management strategies. This information is critical to further our understanding of the N dynamics in soils after CC termination and to comprehensively assess CC as a tool to foster agricultural sustainability.

Our results indicated that the objective of the study was achieved and the original hypotheses could be properly tested. We stated that the rhizosphere effects associated with mowed or glyphosate-terminated plants would exert a differential influence on prokaryotic ammonia oxidizers. The ammonia-oxidizing archaea responded mainly to the termination method (Table 3), as observed in the separation of communities of mowed plants from glyphosate terminated plants and the untreated control (Figure 1). Similarly, a significantly higher amoAAOA gene abundance was detected in microbial communities of mowed plants (Table 1). These results agree with the first hypothesis and are supported by different studies on rhizospheric soil showing that only AOA are responsive to the rhizosphere effect and labile soil organic matter (Chen et al., 2008; Ai et al., 2013; Wattenburger et al., 2020) as well as by several studies that reported potential mixotrophic growth properties of AOA (Wessén et al., 2010; Mußmann et al., 2011; Tourna et al., 2011; Ai et al., 2013; Qin et al., 2014).

Glyphosate treatment in sensitive plants is known to stimulate the release of organic compounds on rhizodeposits through both a higher exudation of carbohydrates and amino acids (Kremer et al., 2005) as wells as through root-derived resources in dying roots (“green bridge” effect; Schlatter et al., 2017), providing organic compounds that could support mixotrophic growth of AOA. Even though this previous knowledge make us expect a higher abundance of AOA in the rhizosphere of desiccated plants, these results were not observed (Table 1). In contrast, our results suggest that the growth of AOA could be impeded after glyphosate termination, as opposed to the increase in abundance observed in the rhizosphere of mowed plants. This result is a meaningful outcome of the study and suggests that the expected increase in AOA abundance relative to the untreated control could be hampered by plant metabolites released after glyphosate-induced biochemical shifts. Based on these results and a significantly lower amoAAOB abundance in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated plants (under the fertilized condition, Table 1), we acknowledge that further research is needed to elucidate whether glyphosate elicited the release of nitrification inhibitors. These inhibitors might have a more intense effect under the fertilized condition as active cells are more sensitive to environmental and external factors (Zhang et al., 2014; Zabaloy et al., 2017). Among them, we cannot exclude glyphosate itself, considering the exudation of this compound through the roots (Kremer et al., 2005) and the reported effects (inhibition) of glyphosate on amoA abundance (Zhang et al., 2018).

The compositional analysis of AOA communities through PCA revealed a separation between communities of mowed plants and the rest of the samples in PC1 (Figure 2, Table 3), with OTU5 and OTU6 as the most discriminant OTUs explaining the ordination (Table 4). We identified OTU5 as positively correlated with PC1 (Table 4) and, thus, more represented in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated plants (Figure 2). Contrary to OTU5, a negative correlation with PC1 was observed for OTU6, which was mainly represented in the rhizosphere of mowed plants. According to the maximum likelihood tree, OTU5 was phylogenetically close to an amoA sequence retrieved from an uncultured AOA of a saturated (suboxic) Tennessee soil (red label, Figure 3). This information suggests that OTU5 could be more adapted to lower oxygen levels in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated or untreated plants than in mowed plants. Further studies in the rhizosphere of terminated and control plants, including oximetry techniques, would be enlightening in this sense. On the other hand, OTU6 (green label, Figure 3) was more represented in the rhizosphere of mowed plants (Figure 2) and was found phylogenetically separated from all the other OTUs in the oat rhizosphere, from amoA sequences in the rhizosphere of maize and from bulk soil samples (Figure 3). The result could be indicating a strong link with the selection imposed by roots of mowed plants in the soil under study.

A marginally significant effect of fertilization was observed in AOA abundance, in an opposite way to AOB, i.e., fertilized plants showed a lower abundance of AOA relative to the unfertilized (Table 1). Similarly, the effect of fertilization in AOA community structure (Table 3) was weak (UniFrac distance) or non-significant (Aitchison distance), as opposed to the effect observed on AOB. Therefore, we confirmed the second hypothesis: AOB were the main responders to inorganic fertilizer addition. This result is supported by different studies showing that AOA prefer conditions, in which ammonium is released at continuous yet low rates through mineralization of organic matter (Stopnišek et al., 2010; Levičnik-Höfferle et al., 2012; Hink et al., 2018).

Under the fertilized condition, a significantly lower abundance of amoAAOB was observed for glyphosate termination relative to the mechanical termination and the untreated control (Table 1, Supplementary Figure S1). Quantitative PCR also showed that the stimulative effect of N fertilization on amoAAOB abundance depends on the termination method, as this effect was only observed in the rhizosphere of mowed and untreated control plants (Table 1, Supplementary Figure S1). This is a critical finding as it suggests that glyphosate termination counteracts the increase in AOB populations that would be normally induced by the inorganic N fertilizers in the rhizosphere or the bulk soil (Chu et al., 2008; Di et al., 2010; Glaser et al., 2010; Strauss et al., 2014). Further research is needed to elucidate the basis of such “repressive” glyphosate effect on the otherwise expected increase of AOB abundance after fertilization, including the potential release of inhibitors. In contrast, amplicon sequencing analysis of amoAAOB revealed no differential effects of the termination method on the community structure (Table 3) or the alpha diversity metrics of AOB (Supplementary Table S7). Thus, for AOB in particular, we rejected our hypothesis regarding a differential influence of termination methods on this group, as termination effects depended upon the fertilization condition and were only observed on populations’ abundance.

In this study, a correlation was observed between PNA and amoAAOB. However, in glyphosate treated plants, the increase in PNA upon fertilization (Table 2) was not followed by an increase in amoAAOB abundance levels (Table 1), as opposed to the response observed in mowed and control plants, suggesting that other important players in ammonia oxidation might be involed in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-terminated plants to explain the stimulation of PNA (Table 2). Moreover, PNA is inherently biased toward AOB rather than AOA (Ai et al., 2013) and thus, equal levels of PNA in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated plants, mowed and untreated plants (Table 2) might be matched by equal levels of amoAAOB, a result that was clearly not observed (Table 1). The lack of effects of root exudates on PNA (Supplementary Figure S2) might indicate that even if potential AOB-inhibitors would be acting on root exudates of glyphosate-treated plants (explaining the invariable levels of amoAAOB upon fertilization), others nitrifiers should take a “back-up” function to maintain the same levels of ammonia oxidation that were observed in the rhizosphere of mowed and control plants. Among them, the AOA did not show a positive response to the fertilizer (Table 1). Thus, a potential role of heterotrophic nitrifiers and comammox Nitrospira in this “back-up” response should be investigated in the rhizosphere of fertilized CC after termination with glyphosate, where the availability of nutrients could be higher by a faster decay of roots (Imparato et al., 2016). Comammox Nitrospira from clades A and B have been both detected and quantitated in soil and in rice rhizosphere (Pjevac et al., 2017). Their role in nitrification in agricultural soils under CC-based managements deserves further research considering the detection of Nitrospirae members closely related to comammox Nitrospira in soil metegenomes, increasing their abundance upon fertilization (Orellana et al., 2018). Similalry, clade B of comammox Nitrospira has been linked to nitrification in contrasting soils when feeded with mineralized organic nitrogen (Wang et al., 2019). On the other hand, a second explanation would be an increase in amoAAOB transcriptional activity upon fertilization even when amoA copy number did not change (Nicol et al., 2008). Further studies might help elucidate this disagreement between abundance and functional analyses in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated plants.

Our results demonstrated that, at the community structure level, AOB communities mainly responded to the fertilizer rather than to the termination method (Table 3). The results of beta diversity for amoAAOB sequences indicated significant differences between communities from fertilized and unfertilized treatments, regardless of the termination method (Table 3). The effect of the inorganic fertilizer on AOB community structure in common oat rhizosphere is in agreement with the results reported by Ai et al. (2013) in maize rhizosphere and in barley rhizosphere (Glaser et al., 2010). At the taxonomic level, we found most OTUs in the Nitrosospira cluster 3 (green and light green labels, Figure 5), confirming that the dominant OTUs in soil belongs to Nitrosospira instead of Nitrosomonas (Fierer et al., 2009). Glaser et al. (2010) and Ai et al. (2013) also found most phylotypes in Nitrosospira cluster 3 for rhizospheric soil. In addition, we found one OTU (OTU4) closer to Nitrosospira cluster 0 strains (light blue label) than to cluster 2 (light red label), cluster 4 (light purple label) or cluster 3 strains (green and light green labels; Figure 5). Members of cluster 0 have been reported in soil, sand, and freshwater environments and showed high rates of nitrifier denitrification among members of Nitrosospira lineage (Shaw et al., 2006).

The consequences of niche specialization in the rhizosphere of terminated CC undoubtedly deserve more attention, considering that previous microcosm studies have reported a differential contribution to nitrous oxide emissions under high ammonium supply (inorganic fertilization) or low supply conditions (organic matter mineralization; Hink et al., 2018). Knowledge of the composition of ammonia oxidizer community can guide best fertilization strategies to optimize N use. A higher abundance of AOA and a different composition of this group of nitrifiers in roots of mowed plants could differentially influence the N availability for the cash crops, especially in soils receiving inorganic fertilizers. In AOA-dominated soils, the nitrification rate of ammonia derived from high inorganic fertilizer concentrations will be lower than in AOB-dominated soils (Hink et al., 2018), resulting probably in higher NH4+ levels for plant uptake after cash crop planting. Further field studies are required to test this hypothesis. The rhizosphere effects associated with the termination methods of a variety of CC other than oats, both alone or in mixture, could similarly influence nitrifying communities.

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate differential responses of AOA and AOB to fertilization and termination methods, reflecting a clear niche specialization in the rhizosphere of terminated oat plants. While AOB were the main responders to inorganic fertilizer addition due to their known preference for high ammonia levels, AOA were more sensitive to the termination method, probably due to a higher sensitivity of AOA to the specific rhizosphere effect of mechanically or chemically terminated plants. Termination with glyphosate counteracted the increase in AOB populations usually triggered by inorganic N fertilizers, showing a “repressive” effect not reflected at the functional level (PNA). A potential role of heterotrophic ammonia-oxidizers and comammox Nitrospira under glyphosate termination is suggested and proposed to be considered in future studies.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra, PRJNA701453.

Author Contributions

MA and MCZ conceived and design the study. MA wrote the original draft, conducted the formal analysis and review, and performed PNA measurements. MEM and MCZ performed the greenhouse assay, soil sampling, DNA extraction, and qPCR. MCZ and MBV are credited for manuscript review, project administration, resources, and funding acquisition. MBV contributed to statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Argentinean National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT) [grant number PICT 2015–1556]; the Universidad Nacional del Sur [grant number PGI 24/A240], the Office of International Programs – College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences (ACES), ACES International Seed Grant [grant number, ISGF2018-MV] and USDA grant ILLU-802-978. M. Allegrini and M.E. Morales hold postdoctoral and doctoral fellowships awarded by CONICET, respectively.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Technician Ana M. Zamponi (CONICET) for assistance with greenhouse assay and soil sampling, Dr. Gastón A. Iocoli for soil sampling and analysis, and CONICET for the postdoctoral and doctoral fellowships awarded to MA and MEM, respectively. We are grateful to C. L. Wright and M. Band (Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois) for their valuable assistance and support in the amoA amplicon sequencing service.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.746524/full#supplementary-material

References

Aitchison, J. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. (1986). London-New York: Chapman and Hall.

Google Scholar

Ai, C., Liang, G., Sun, J., Wang, X., He, P., and Zhou, W. (2013). Different roles of rhizosphere effect and long-term fertilization in the activity and community structure of ammonia oxidizers in a calcareous fluvo-aquic soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aldana, A., and Carioni, D.. (2001). Influencia de la posición topográfica sobre propiedades edáficas de suelos en el predio de la UNS en Altos del Palihue. Trabajo final de tesina. Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur. Available at: https://catalogoagronomia.uns.edu.ar (Accessed January 13, 2021).

Google Scholar

Allegrini, M., Gomez, E. D. V., Smalla, K., and Zabaloy, M. C. (2019). Suppression treatment differentially influences the microbial community and the occurrence of broad host range plasmids in the rhizosphere of the model cover crop Avena sativa L. PLoS One 14:e0223600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolyen, E., Rideout, J. R., Dillon, M. R., Bokulich, N. A., Abnet, C. C., Al-Ghalith, G. A., et al. (2019). Author correction: reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bru, D., Ramette, A., Saby, N. P., Dequiedt, S., Ranjard, L., Jolivet, C., et al. (2010). Determinants of the distribution of nitrogen-cycling microbial communities at the landscape scale. ISME J. 5, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caliz, J., Montes-Borrego, M., Triadó-Margarit, X., Metsis, M., Landa, B. B., and Casamayor, E. O. (2015). Influence of edaphic, climatic, and agronomic factors on the composition and abundance of nitrifying microorganisms in the rhizosphere of commercial olive crops. PLoS One 10:e0125787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chavarría, D. N., Verdenelli, R. A., Muñoz, E. J., Conforto, C., Restovich, S. B., Andriulo, A. E., et al. (2016). Soil microbial functionality in response to the inclusion of cover crop mixtures in agricultural systems. Span. J. Agric. Res. 14:e0304. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2016142-8395

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X.-P., Zhu, Y.-G., Xia, Y., Shen, J.-P., and He, J.-Z. (2008). Ammonia-oxidizing archaea: important players in paddy rhizosphere soil? Environ. Microbiol. 10, 1978–1987. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01613.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J. (2021). GUniFrac: Generalized UniFrac Distances and Distance-Based Multivariate Analysis of Variance. R package version 1.2. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GUniFrac (Accessed July 23, 2021).

Google Scholar

Chu, H., Fujii, T., Morimoto, S., Lin, X., and Yaki, K. (2008). Population size and specific nitrification potential of sol ammonia-oxidizing bacteria under long-term fertilization management. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 1960–1963. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di, H., Cameron, K. C., Shen, J., Winefield, C. S., O’Callaghan, M., Bowatte, S., et al. (2010). Ammonia–oxidizing bacteria and archaea grow under contrasting soil nitrogen conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 72, 386–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00861.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drury, C. F., Hart, S. C., and Xang, X. M. (2006). “Nitrification techniques for soil,” in Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Part. 2. eds. M. R. Carter and E. G. Gregorich (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. Canadian Society of Soil Science), 495–515.

Google Scholar

Egle, K., Römer, W., and Keller, H. (2003). Exudation of low molecular weight organic acids by Lupinus albus L., Lupinus angustifolius L. and Lupinus luteus L. as affected by phosphorus supply. Agronomie 23, 511–518. doi: 10.1051/agro:2003025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C., and Bailey, B. A. (2005). Role of cover crops in improving soil and row crop productivity. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 36, 2733–2757. doi: 10.1080/00103620500303939

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fierer, N., Carney, K. M., Horner-Devine, M. C., and Megonigal, J. P. (2009). The biogeography of ammonia–oxidizing bacterial communities in soil. Microb. Ecol. 58, 435–445. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9517-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fish, J. A., Chai, B., Wang, Q., Sun, Y., Brown, C. T., Tiedje, J. M., et al. (2013). FunGene: The functional gene pipeline and repository. Front. Microbiol. 4:291. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frank, D. A., and Groffman, P. M. (2009). Plant rhizospheric N processes: what we don’t know and why we should care. Ecology 90, 1512–1519. doi: 10.1890/08-0789.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glaser, K., Hackl, E., Inselsbacher, E., Strauss, J., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., et al. (2010). Dynamics of ammonia–oxidizing communities in barley planted bulk soil and rhizosphere following nitrate and ammonium fertilizer amendment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 74, 575–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00970.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gloor, G. B., and Reid, G. (2016). Compositional analysis: a valid approach to analyze microbiome high-throughput sequencing data. Can. J. Microbiol. 62, 692–703. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2015-0821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., and Egozcue, J. J. (2017). Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 8:2224. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hart, S. C., Stark, J. M., Davidson, E. A., and Firestone, M. K. (1994). “Nitrogen mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification,” in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2—Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. eds. R. W. Weaver, S. Angle, P. Bottomed, D. Bezdicek, S. Smith, and A. Tabatabai, et al. (Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America), 985–1018.

Google Scholar

He, J., Shen, J., Zhang, L., Zhu, Y., Zheng, Y., Xu, M., et al. (2007). Quantitative analyses of the abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea of a Chinese upland red soil under long-term fertilization practices. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 2364–2374. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01358.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hervé, M. (2021). RVAideMemoire: Testing and Plotting Procedures for Biostatistics. R package version 0.9–80. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire (Accessed July 23, 2021).

Google Scholar

Hink, L., Gubry-Rangin, C., Nicol, G. W., and Prosser, J. I. (2018). The consequences of niche and physiological differentiation of archaeal and bacterial ammonia oxidisers for nitrous oxide emissions. ISME J. 12, 1084–1093. doi: 10.1038/s41396-017-0025-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffmann, H., Schloter, M., and Wilke, B. M. (2007). Microscale-scale measurement of potential nitrification rates of soil aggregates. Biol. Fertil. Soils 44, 411–413. doi: 10.1007/s00374-007-0227-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imparato, V., Santos, S. S., Johansen, A., Geisenb, S., and Winding, A. (2016). Stimulation of bacteria and protists in rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated barley. Appl. Soil Ecol. 98, 47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.09.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, D. A. (1993). Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of Heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74, 2204–2214. doi: 10.2307/1939574

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kassambara, A., and Mundt, F. (2020). factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.7. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra (Accessed July 23, 2021).

Google Scholar

Kim, N., Zabaloy, M. C., Guan, K., and Villamil, M. B. (2020). Do cover crops benefit soil microbiome? A meta-analysis of current research. Soil Biol. Biochem. 142:107701. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107701

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

King, A. E., and Hofmockel, K. S. (2017). Diversified cropping systems support greater microbial cycling and retention of carbon and nitrogen. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 240, 66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.040

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kremer, R. J., Means, N. E., and Kim, S. (2005). Glyphosate affects soybean root exudation and rhizosphere micro−organisms. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 85, 1165–1174. doi: 10.1080/03067310500273146

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, S., Sainju, U. M., and Jellum, E. J. (1997). Winter cover cropping influence on nitrogen in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 1392–1399. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100050016x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lê, S., Josse, J., and Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 25, 1–18. doi: 10.18637/jss.v025.i01

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lenth, R. V. (2021). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.6.1. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (Accessed July 23, 2021).

Google Scholar

Letunic, I., and Bork, P. (2016). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levičnik-Höfferle, Š., Nicol, G. W., Ausec, L., Mandić-Mulec, I., and Prosser, J. I. (2012). Stimulation of thaumarchaeal ammonia oxidation by ammonia derived from organic nitrogen but not added inorganic nitrogen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 80, 114–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01275.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J. H., Jiao, S. M., Gao, R. Q., and Bardgett, R. D. (2012). Differential effects of legume species on the recovery of soil microbial communities, and carbon and nitrogen contents, in abandoned fields of the loess plateau. China. Environ. Manage. 50, 1193–1203. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9958-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Littell, R. C., Stroup, W. W., and Freund, R. J. (2002). “Analysis of variance for balanced data,” in SAS for Linear Models. ed. SAS Institute. Fourth ed (Cary, NC: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics), 87–88.

Google Scholar

Lourenço, K. S., Cassman, N. A., Pijl, A. S., van Veen, J. A., Cantarella, H., and Kuramae, E. E. (2018). Nitrosospira sp. govern nitrous oxide emissions in a tropical soil amended with residues of bioenergy crop. Front. Microbiol. 9:674. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Y. C., Watkins, K. B., Teasdale, J. R., and Abdul-Baki, A. A. (2000). Cover crop in sustainable food production. Food Rev. Int. 16, 121–157. doi: 10.1081/FRI-100100285

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, X., Taylor, A. E., Myrold, D. D., and Neufeld, J. D. (2020). Expanding perspectives of soil nitrification to include ammonia-oxidizing archaea and comammox bacteria. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 84, 287–302. doi: 10.1002/saj2.20029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morrison, E., Lagos, L., Al-Agely, A., Glaab, H., Johnson, W., Jorquera, M. A., et al. (2017). Mycorrhizal inoculation increases the genes associated with nitrification and improved nutrients retention in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 53, 275–279. doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1176-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mußmann, M., Brito, I., Pitcher, A., Sinninghe Damste, J. S., Hatzenpichler, R., Richter, A., et al. (2011). Thaumarchaeotes abundant in refinery nitrifying sludges express amoA but are not obligate autotrophic ammonia oxidizers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 16771–16776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106427108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nicol, G. W., Leininger, S., Schleper, C., and Prosser, J. I. (2008). The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2966–2978. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01701.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., et al. (2020). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–7. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (Accessed July 23, 2021).

Google Scholar

Orellana, L. H., Chee-Sanford, J. C., Sanford, R. A., Löffler, F. E., and Konstantinidis, K. T. (2018). Year-round shotgun metagenomes reveal stable microbial communities in agricultural soils and novel ammonia oxidizers responding to fertilization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e01646–e01617. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01646-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ouyang, Y., Norton, J. M., Stark, J. M., Reeve, J. R., and Habteselassie, M. Y. (2016). Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are more responsive than archaea to nitrogen source in an agricultural soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 96, 4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palarea-Albaladejo, J., and Martin-Fernandez, J. (2015). ZCompositions – R package for multivariate imputation of left-censored data under a compositional approach. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 143, 85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.02.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, H. D., Wells, G. F., Bae, H., Criddle, C. S., and Francis, C. A. (2006). Occurrence of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in wastewater treatment plant bioreactors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5643–5647. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00402-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira e Silva, M. C., Poly, F., Guilaumaud, N., van Elsas, J. D., and Salles, J. F. (2012). Fluctuations in ammonia oxidizing communities across agricultural soils are driven by soil structure and pH. Front. Microbiol. 3:77. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., and Sarkar, D. (2021). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–152. Availale at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

Google Scholar

Pjevac, P., Schauberger, C., Poghosyan, L., Herbold, C. W., van Kessel, M. A. H. J., Daebeler, A., et al. (2017). AmoA-targeted polymerase chain reaction primers for the specific detection and quantification of comammox Nitrospira in the environment. Front. Microbiol. 8:1508. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01508

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, W., Amin, S. A., Martens-Habbena, W., Walker, C. B., Urakawa, H., Devol, A. H., et al. (2014). Marine ammonia-oxidizing archaeal isolates display obligate mixotrophy and wide ecotypic variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 12504–12509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324115111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/ (Accessed July 23, 2021).

Google Scholar

Ridley, N. (2012). “Cultivos de cobertura en el sur de Santa Fé: Efectos sobre la eficiencia de barbecho y la porosidad del suelo” in Contribución de los cultivos de cobertura a la sustentabilidad de los sistemas de producción, eds. C. Álvarez, A. Quiroga, D. Santos, and Bodrero (Anguil, La Pampa, Argentina: Ediciones INTA), 117–127.

Google Scholar

Ritz, K., Black, H. I. J., Campbell, C. D., Harris, J. A., and Wood, C. (2009). Selecting biological indicators for monitoring soils: a framework for balancing scientific and technical opinion to assist policy development. Ecol. Indic. 9, 1212–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Romdhane, S., Spor, A., Busset, H., Falchetto, L., Martin, J., Bizouard, F., et al. (2019). Cover crop management practices rather than composition of cover crop mixtures affect bacterial communities in no-till agroecosystems. Front. Microbiol. 10:1618. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlatter, D. C., Yin, C., Hulbert, S., Burke, I., and Paulitz, T. (2017). Impacts of repeated glyphosate use on wheat-associated bacteria are small and depend on glyphosate use history. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e01354–e01317. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01354-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schliep, K. P. (2011). Phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schliep, K. P. (2018). Phylogenetic Trees With Phangorn. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/phangorn/vignettes/Trees.pdf (Accessed January 15, 2020).

Google Scholar

Shaw, L. J., Nicol, G. W., Smith, Z., Fear, J., Prosser, J. I., and Baggs, E. M. (2006). Nitrosospira spp. can produce nitrous oxide via a nitrifier denitrification pathway. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 214–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00882.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sievers, T., and Cook, R. L. (2018). Aboveground and root decomposition of cereal rye and hairy vetch cover crops. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 82, 147–155. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2017.05.0139

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soil Science Society of America (1997). Glossary of Soil Science Term, Madison: SSSA.

Google Scholar

Strauss, S. L., Reardon, C. L., and Mazzola, M. (2014). The response of ammonia-oxidizer activity and community structure to fertilizer amendment of orchard soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 410–418. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stopnišek, N., Gubry-Rangin, C., Höfferle, Š., Nicol, G. W., Mandič-Mulec, I., and Prosser, J. I. (2010). Thaumarchaeal ammonia oxidation in an acidic forest peat soil is not influenced by ammonium amendment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 7626–7634. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00595-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tourna, M., Stieglmeier, M., Spang, A., Könneke, M., Schintlmeister, A., Urich, T., et al. (2011). Nitrososphaera viennensis, an ammonia oxidizing archaeon from soil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 20, 8420–8425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013488108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z. H., Cao, Y. Q., Zhu-Barker, X., Nicol, G. W., Wright, A. L., Jia, Z. J., et al. (2019). Comammox Nitrospira clade B contributes to nitrification in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 135, 392–395. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.06.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wattenburger, C. J., Gutknecht, J., Zhang, Q., Brutnell, T., Hofmockel, K., and Halverson, L. (2020). The rhizosphere and cropping system, but not arbuscular mycorrhizae, affect ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria abundances in two agricultural soils. App. Soil Ecol. 151:103540. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103540

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wessén, E., Nyberg, K., Jansson, J. K., and Hallin, S. (2010). Responses of bacterial and archaeal ammonia oxidizers to soil organic and fertilizer amendments under long-term management. App. Soil Ecol. 45, 193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.04.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wessén, E., and Hallin, S. (2011). Abundance of archaeal and bacterial ammonia oxidizers – possible bioindicator for soil monitoring. Ecol. Indic. 11, 1696–1698. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Google Scholar

Yanai, R. D., Majdi, H., and Park, B. B. (2003). Measured and modeled differences in nutrient concentrations between rhizosphere and bulk soil in a Norway spruce stand. Plant Soil 257, 133–142. doi: 10.1023/A:1026257508033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, H. Y., Gao, Y. M., Nicol, G. W., Campbell, C. D., Prosser, J. I., Zhang, L. M., et al. (2011). Links between ammonia oxidizer community structure, abundance, and nitrification potential in acidic soils. Appl. Environ. Microb. 77, 4618–4625. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00136-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zabaloy, M. C., Carne, I., Viassolo, R., Gómez, M., and Gomez, E. (2016). Soil ecotoxicity assessment of glyphosate use under field conditions: microbial activity and community structure of Eubacteria and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Pest Manag. Sci. 72, 684–691. doi: 10.1002/ps.4037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zabaloy, M. C., Allegrini, M., Tebbe, D. A., Schuster, K., and Gomez, E. (2017). Nitrifying bacteria and archaea withstanding glyphosate in fertilized soil microcosms. Appl. Soil Ecol. 117−118, 88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.04.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Dai, M., Jiao, N., and Herndl, G. J. (2014). Drivers shaping the diversity and biogeography of total and active bacterial communities in the South China Sea. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2260–2274. doi: 10.1111/mec.12739

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, M., Wang, W., Tang, L., Heenan, M., and Xu, Z. (2018). Effects of nitrification inhibitor and herbicides on nitrification, nitrite and nitrate consumptions and nitrous oxide emission in an Australian sugarcane soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 54, 697–706. doi: 10.1007/s00374-018-1293-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: amoA, inorganic nitrogen, glyphosate, cover crop management, Avena sativa L

Citation: Allegrini M, Morales ME, Villamil MB and Zabaloy MC (2021) Ammonia Oxidizing Prokaryotes Respond Differently to Fertilization and Termination Methods in Common Oat’s Rhizosphere. Front. Microbiol. 12:746524. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.746524

Received: 24 July 2021; Accepted: 06 September 2021;
Published: 06 October 2021.

Edited by:

Yurong Liu, Huazhong Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by:

Yongxin Lin, Fujian Normal University, China
Qing Wang, Hainan University, China
Yan Zhang, Jiangnan University, China

Copyright © 2021 Allegrini, Morales, Villamil and Zabaloy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: María Celina Zabaloy, bXphYmFsb3lAdW5zLmVkdS5hcg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.