Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 10 September 2021
Sec. Microbial Symbioses

Isolation and Characterization of High-Efficiency Rhizobia From Western Kenya Nodulating With Common Bean

  • Department of Plant Physiology, Matthias Schleiden Institute of Genetics, Bioinformatics and Molecular Botany, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany

Common bean is one of the primary protein sources in third-world countries. They form nodules with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, which have to be adapted to the local soils. Commercial rhizobial strains such as Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 are often used in agriculture. However, this strain failed to significantly increase the common bean yield in many places, including Kenya, due to the local soils’ low pH. We isolated two indigenous rhizobial strains from the nodules of common bean from two fields in Western Kenya that have never been exposed to commercial inocula. We then determined their ability to fix nitrogen in common beans, solubilize phosphorus, and produce indole acetic acid. In greenhouse experiments, common bean plants inoculated with two isolates, B3 and S2 in sterile vermiculite, performed better than those inoculated with CIAT899 or plants grown with nitrogen fertilizer alone. In contrast to CIAT899, both isolates grew in the media with pH 4.8. Furthermore, isolate B3 had higher phosphate solubilization ability and produced more indole acetic acid than the other two rhizobia. Genome analyses revealed that B3 and S2 are different strains of Rhizobium phaseoli. We recommend fieldwork studies in Kenyan soils to test the efficacy of the two isolates in the natural environment in an effort to produce inoculants specific for these soils.

Introduction

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an essential source of proteins, carbohydrates, vitamin B complex (riboflavin, thiamine, niacin, and folic acid), and vital minerals in human nutrition. Flavonoids and isoflavonoids, mainly produced as defense compounds against phytopathogens, and antioxidants as protectors against UV radiations act as anti-cancer agents that inhibit the tyrosine kinase, cyclooxygenase, protein kinase C, and lipoxygenase enzyme activities (Romero-Arenas et al., 2013). Common bean is therefore not only a source of essential nutrients but also has medicinal features.

In many parts of the world, the production of common bean is restricted by poor soil fertility, particularly nitrogen limitations (Simon et al., 2014). The farmers cannot compensate for this shortage by applying fertilizers, mainly because of economic reasons (cf. Khonje, 1989; Onim, 1993; Savci, 2012). Soil inoculation with rhizobia is an inexpensive and environmentally friendly alternative. Rhizobia not only supply the plants with nitrogen through nitrogen fixation but also protect them against pathogens by activating their immune system (Mishra and Singh, 2006; Beardon et al., 2014). They also confer tolerance to extreme temperatures, drought, salinity, or non-appropriate soil pH, often restricting common bean yield (Mabrouk et al., 2018). Another feature of the rhizobia is phosphorus provision to the host plants through phosphate solubilization (Hao et al., 2014); however, solubilizing phosphate’s ability differs substantially among rhizobial strains.

Kenya is one of the significant common bean producers in East Africa (Katungi et al., 2009; Kawaka et al., 2014; Duku et al., 2020). However, little is known about their local rhizobial communities. Most commercial rhizobia inoculants used in Kenya originate from the United States or South America (Kawaka et al., 2014), such as the widely used Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 strain from Colombia. Although this strain is genetically stable and tolerates high temperatures, it does not improve the yields in most Kenyan soils due to low adaptation to local edaphic conditions (Mwenda et al., 2018). Furthermore, it competes with indigenous rhizobia (Mungai and Karubiu, 2011), which are not well characterized but adapted to the local Kenyan conditions. In some circumstances, newly introduced rhizobia were outcompeted by the local strains (Mathu et al., 2012).

Furthermore, the rhizobial community associated with the legumes differs substantially in different agricultural areas. Therefore, isolation and characterization of well-adapted rhizobia related to common bean in Western Kenyan soils are significant initial steps toward developing an inoculant with the potential to improve crop productivity in this region. As an initial attempt, we (1) isolated rhizobia associated with common bean indigenous to Western Kenyan soils, (2) screened for their symbiotic potential, (3) sequenced their genomes, and (4) identified and characterized the isolates by genome analyses.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of Rhizobia

Nodules were sampled from the farmers’ field in two regions of Western Kenya with no history of commercial or agricultural rhizobia inoculation: Bukhayo West (0°27′00.2″ N 34°07′59.9″ E) in Busia County and Sang’alo (0°21′04.9″ N 35°03′00.3″ E) in Bungoma County. Western Kenya is generally warm and wet throughout the year. The temperature ranges from 19.6 to 21.9°C and averages 1,395 mm of rain per year, running from 65 to 210 mm per month. Five healthy nodules per plant were carefully removed from randomly selected 10 plants per sampling site and surface sterilized in 70% ethanol for 30 s and 5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, followed by seven sterile distilled water changes. They were then crushed in a drop of saline solution, and the exudate was streaked on yeast extract mannitol agar (YMA) and maintained at 30°C for 4 days. Pure colonies were then stored in yeast extract mannitol broth (YMB) at 4°C for short time storage or in YMB with 25% glycerol at −80°C for long-term storage. Plant infection assay (Somasegaran and Hoben, 2012), in which the isolates were re-infected into the common bean plants growing in the sterile vermiculite supplied Leonard jar assemblages (Trung and Yoshida, 1983) and monitored for nodulation ability, was performed to identify rhizobia among the isolates.

Potential for Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphorus Solubilization, and Indole Acetic Acid Production

Nitrogen Fixation

Rosecoco bean seeds (Kenya Seed Company Ltd., Kitale, Kenya) of uniform size were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol and 2% mercuric chloride for 1 min, followed by thorough rinsing with sterile distilled water. Three seeds were planted in plastic jars supplied with sterile vermiculite (Raiffeisen Gartenbau GmbH & Co. KG, Erfurt, Germany). After germination, they were thinned to one seedling per jar. Seven-day-old seedlings were inoculated with 1 ml of the rhizobial culture (OD600 = 0.5). The experimental setup consisted of five treatments and six replications: (i) plants irrigated with nitrogen solution (0.8 mM NO3), (ii) plants inoculated with standard R. tropici CIAT899, (iii) plants inoculated with rhizobia isolate B3, (iv) plants inoculated with rhizobia isolate S2, and (v) negative control, no nitrogen nor rhizobia inoculation. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design. Besides, plants inoculated with the standard R. tropici CIAT899 strain were used as a reference. All seedlings were kept moist by a regular supply of nitrogen-free nutrient solution (Beck et al., 1993) consisting of 1.00 mM CaCl2⋅2H2O, 0.50 mM KH2PO4, 0.25 mM MgSO4⋅7H2O, 0.25 mM K2SO4, 1.00 μM MnSO4⋅H2O, 0.30 μM H3BO3, 0.50 μM ZnSO4⋅H2O, 0.20 μM CuSO4⋅5H2O, 0.01 μM NaMoO2⋅H2O, 0.01 μM CoSO4⋅7H2O, and 10.00 μM Fe citrate. After 45 days, the plants’ total dry weight, total nitrogen, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents were determined. Dry weight was determined after drying the plant material at 60°C for 48 h in an oven (Heraeus Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Hanau, Germany). The N content per plant was analyzed using the phenol-nitroprusside method (Bilbao et al., 1999). For determining the chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, 100 mg of plant material was crushed in 10 ml of buffered acetone (acetone and sodium phosphate buffer in the ratio 4:1), centrifuged at 13,000g. Absorption intensity was measured at 663, 646, and 480 nm with Shimadzu UV 160A spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The absorption values at 750 nm were subtracted from the 663, 646, and 480 nm absorptions. We calculated the chlorophyll and carotenoid contents using the equations by Porra et al. (1989) and Sarker et al. (2014), respectively. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s HSD in Python 3.8 statsmodels package (Seabold and Perktold, 2010) was performed to check if the observed differences in the mean values of biomass, nitrogen, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents were statistically significant. The results were visualized by the Matplotlib package (Barrett et al., 2005) in Python 3.8.

Phosphorus Solubilization

The isolates’ ability to solubilize phosphorus was assayed on agar plates containing Pikovskaya’s media (Pikovskaya, 1948) supplemented with 5 g/l of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and 1.5% agar. After 10 days of incubation at 30°C, the formation of a hallo zone was evidence of phosphorus solubilization ability. We determined the quantity of solubilized phosphorus in the National Botanical Institute Research Phosphate (NBRIP) broth. About 1 ml of bacterial culture (OD600 = 0.5) from the isolates were washed in sterile 0.85% sodium chloride and then transferred to 100 ml NBRIP media (Nautiyal, 1999) supplemented with 2.5 g/l of hydroxyapatite (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), incubated at 30°C and 150 rpm in 250-ml flasks. After 7 days, 10 ml of the broth was withdrawn to determine the amount of solubilized phosphorus by the molybdenum blue assay (Murphy and Riley, 1962) and the supernatant’s pH.

Indole Acetic Acid Production

Isolates were grown in 50 ml minimal media at 30°C, which contained CaCl2⋅2H2O (1,000 μM/l), MgSO4⋅7H2O (500 μM/l), KCl (50 μM/l), FeEDTA (25 μM/l), KH2PO4 (3,000 μM/l), H3BO3 (10 μM/l), MnSO4⋅H2O (1 μM/l), ZnSO4⋅7H2O (0.5 μM/l), CuSO4⋅5H2O (0.1 μM/l), Na2MoO4 (0.025 μM/l), CoCl2⋅6H2O (0.005 μM/l), sodium glutamate (1.8 g/l), mannitol (10 g/l), and L-tryptophan (2 g/l). Sodium glutamate and L-tryptophan were supplied as filter sterilized solutions. Indole acetic acid (IAA) was determined by a colorimetric method (Gilbert et al., 2018). Briefly, after 4 days, 1 ml of the broth was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and added to 2 ml of Salkowski reagent (10 mM FeCl3 and 35% perchloric acid). The resultant mixture was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min before its intensity was measured at 530 nm. The total amount of IAA was estimated from the standard indole acetic acid curve.

Phenotypic and Biochemical Characterization of the Isolates

The bromothymol blue (BTB) reaction (Dupree and Wilcox, 1977) was performed to determine the influence of the isolates on the pH of the media. In YMA plates, 0.0025% BTB (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) was included. Gram staining was performed following the protocol of Coico (2006), and the stained smear was viewed with Axio Imager.M2 (Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Germany). Isolates’ ability to absorb Congo red (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) was determined following the procedure of Kneen and LaRue (1983). Catalase test was performed by transferring 1 ml of overnight culture broth in 3% hydrogen peroxide. The formation of effervescence was positive for catalase activity. We tested the ability of the isolates to grow on different carbohydrates provided as the sole carbon source. This test was performed in standard YMA media. Mannitol was replaced by L-arabinose, D-glucose, lactose, D-fructose, D-maltose, sucrose, and mannitol (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany); sodium glutamate (Tokyo Chemical Industries Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan); or D-galactose (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). Each isolate was analyzed in duplicates, and the growth at 28°C was recorded every 24 h for 5 days. Isolates’ ability to grow in different pH environments was tested in YMB. About 0.4 ml culture broth of cell density at OD600 = 0.5 was inoculated in 50 ml YMB at pH 4.8, 7.0, and 9.0 and incubated in an orbital shaker (150 rpm) at 28°C. After 12 h, absorbance at 600 nm was recorded and used to calculate the percentage inhibition of the three isolates at pH 4.8 and 9.0 using pH 7.0 as the reference with the equation in Nadri et al. (2014).

Whole-Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

Genomic DNA was isolated from 3-day-old rhizobia strains following a slightly modified protocol by Wilson (2001) and used to prepare 3-kb DNA libraries. Cells were collected from 5 ml broth by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 10 min. The cell pellet was re-suspended in 568 μl of TE buffer, then 2 μl of 2-mercaptoethanol and 30 μl of 10% SDS were added and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. At 65°C, 100 μl of 3M NaCl solution followed by 80 μl of 10% CTAB was added and incubated for 10 min. 624 μl of chloroform–isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred to a new collecting tube, and an equal amount of phenol–chloroform–isoamyl alcohol (24:24:1) was added and centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was transferred to a 1.5-ml tube, and equal volume of isopropanol was added, incubated for 2 min at room temperature, and centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm. The pellet was then washed twice with 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 7,500 rpm for 5 min. All traces of ethanol were removed, and the pellet was air-dried at room temperature for 10 min then dissolved in 50 μl nuclease-free water.

The DNA was sequenced using Illumina’s MiSeq at Novogene (London, United Kingdom) to obtain 250 base pair paired-end reads. Genome assembly was performed with Unicyler v0.4.8 (Wick et al., 2017), gaps in the contigs filled by abyss-sealer v2.2.8 (Simpson et al., 2009), and contig scaffolding was implemented in RagTag v1.0.1 (Alonge et al., 2019). Gene annotation was done using and RASTtk pipeline on the RAST server v2.0 (Brettin et al., 2015), Prokka v1.13.4 (Seemann, 2014), and PGAP (Tatusova et al., 2016).

Comparative Genomics

Pangenome Analysis

Genome sequences of Rhizobium phaseoli (GCA_001664385.1), Rhizobium etli (GCA_002119845.1), R. tropici (GCA_00033088 5.1), R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii (GCA_004306555.1), Sinorhizobium meliloti (GCA_000006965.1), R. grahamii (GCA_003351175.1), R. pusense (GCA_013285525.1), R. esperanzea (GCA_001664265.1), R. laguerreae (GCA_013004195.1), R. leguminosarum bv. viciae (GCA_003351345.1), R. sullae (GCA_002812325.1), R. favelukesii (GCA_000577275.2), and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (GCA_003667905.1) were retrieved from the NCBI database. Together with strains B3 and S2 (cf. below), they were used to cluster the genes into their respective cluster of orthologous groups (COGs) with COGsoft (Kristensen et al., 2010) and OrthoMCL (Li et al., 2003). We used a Perl script in GET_HOMOLOGUES v3.3.2 (Contreras-Moreira and Vinuesa, 2013) to generate the pangenome matrix representing the intersection between COGsoft and OrthoMCL clusters. The pangenome matrix was used to generate the maximum likelihood pangenome phylogenomic tree with IQ-TREE v1.6.12 after determining the best fit model by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) in GET_PHYLOMARKERS (Vinuesa et al., 2018) and visualized by FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut, 2012). We generated a Venn diagram with jvenn (Bardou et al., 2014) to visualize orthologous gene overlaps in different rhizobial strains.

To perform the species identity of isolates B3 and S2, we determined the average nucleotide identity (ANI) of the isolates with FastANI v1.3 (Jain et al., 2018) and average amino acid identity (AAI) with CompareM v0.1.2 (Parkers, 2014). We also determined the digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) and genetic distances with GGDC v2.1 (Meier-Kolthoff et al., 2014) referenced to R. phaseoli, R. etli, and R. leguminosarum.

Synteny Analysis

A synteny analysis was performed to determine the gene order and rearrangements in the genes of isolates B3 and S2 compared to the genome of R. phaseoli. R. phaseoli were chosen because an orthologous analysis revealed that the isolates B3 and S2 belong to the same species. We performed the analysis with Sibelia v3.0.7 (Minkin et al., 2013) and visualized the results as chords with Circos v0.69-9 (Krzywinski et al., 2009).

Results

Potential for Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphorus Solubilization, and Indole Acetic Acid Production

Nitrogen Fixation

We isolated 45 putative rhizobia strains from common bean’s root nodules from two areas in Western Kenya with no commercial rhizobia application history. Reinoculating the bacteria in the common bean identified 10 isolates that generated nodules, which confirmed them as rhizobia. However, eight isolates did not relieve the common bean from acute nitrogen starvation, while two isolates (B3 and S2) did. Inoculation with these two rhizobia allowed the common bean to grow without nitrogen supply, improved plant health (Figure 1A) and yield in terms of total dry weight (Figure 1B) and tissue nitrogen content (Figure 1C). The dry weights of B3- and S2-inoculated plants were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of the uninoculated plants. They were also more than plants supplied with nitrogenous fertilizer or inoculated with the commercial R. tropici CIAT899, though not significant at p < 0.05. Moreover, inoculation with B3 and S2 resulted in significantly more tissue nitrogen than in uninoculated, nitrogen-fertilized plants, or those inoculated with CIAT899. The chlorophyll (Figure 1D) and carotenoid (Figure 1E) content was also significantly higher at p = 0.05 in plants inoculated with the new strains than uninoculated controls; however, the data was not significantly different compared to the nitrogen-fertilized and CIAT899-inoculated control plants.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) The effect of rhizobia inoculation on common bean grown under nitrogen-limited conditions in the greenhouse. Plants supplied with (I) nitrogen fertilizer; (II) no nitrogen fertilizer and no rhizobia; no nitrogen fertilizer but inoculation with CIAT899 (III), B3 (IV), or S2 (V). The (B) total dry weight, (C) the total quantity of tissue nitrogen, (D) chlorophyll, and (E) carotenoid content.

Phosphate Solubilization and Indole Acetic Acid Production

The three rhizobial strains, B3, S2, and CIAT899, solubilized insoluble tricalcium phosphate on Pikovskaya’s agar plates as indicated by clear hallo zones around the colonies (Figure 2A) and hydroxyapatite in liquid NBRIP media (Figure 2B). The solubilized phosphate in the medium inoculated with B3 (11.5 mg) was significantly higher than the amounts solubilized by the isolate S2 (7.2 mg) and CIAT899 (10.9 mg) at 95% confidence. Notably, B3 had higher phosphate solubilization efficacy than the commercial CIAT899 strain, and S2 was the least efficacious among the three strains. The supernatants’ pH were reduced from 7.0 to 5.3 for B3 and 5.4 for S2 and CIAT899. Although CIAT899 is known to produce alkaline compounds in full media with pH 7.0, the drop in the pH in media with insoluble phosphate demonstrates that it can also generate acidic compounds if phosphate solubilization is required.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Phosphate solubilization on Pikovskaya’s agar plates (A) and amount of solubilized phosphorus in NBRIP broth (B) of the rhizobia isolates. Bars represent standard errors based on three independent replications.

Likewise, the three strains produced IAA in tryptophan-supplemented media. Again, isolate B3 was the most effective IAA producer (574 μg/ml), followed by isolate S2 (423 μg/ml) and CIAT899 (268 μg/ml) (Figure 3). At a 5% error margin, isolates B3 and S2 produced significantly more IAA than CIAT899.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Amount of indole acetic acid (IAA) produced by the isolates CIAT899, B3, and S2 in the liquid media and measured by calorimetric method.

Phenotypic and Biochemical Characteristics of the Newly Isolated Strains

The isolates B3 and S2 formed colonies with an entire margin, elevated convex surface, and slightly translucent. This was the opposite for CIAT899, whose colonies appeared opaque white and flat on the surface. The B3 colonies appeared more mucoid than S2 and even more than CIAT899, probably due to its overproduction of exopolysaccharides. B3 and S2 changed the green BTB dye to yellow on a complete medium, showing that they are acid producers instead of CIAT899, which changed the color to light blue, indicating that it is an alkaline-producing bacterium (Supplementary Figure 1). Again, different from CAIT899, B3 and S2 only slightly absorbed Congo red (Supplementary Figure 2). The absorption of this dye is often used as a criterion for identifying rhizobia during isolation procedures (cf. section “Discussion).

Furthermore, the isolates were stained as gram-negative rods (Supplementary Figure 3), and all three were positive for the catalase test. When applied as sole carbon sources, all isolates utilized mannitol, glucose, glutamate, arabinose, galactose, maltose, fructose, sucrose, and lactose. Isolate S2 and CIAT899 had a maximal growth at pH 7.0, while B3’s maximum growth was observed at pH 4.8. At pH 4.8, CIAT899 was 98.1% inhibited, S2 was only 8.4% inhibited, while B3 was not inhibited. However, all three isolates were inhibited at pH 9.0; CIAT899 performed better in these conditions (60.1% inhibited), while both B3 and S2 were highly inhibited at this pH, 97.7 and 98.6%, respectively (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The growth pattern of isolates B3, S2, and CIAT899 in yeast extract mannitol broth (YMB), in which the pH was maintained 4.8, 7.0, and 9.0. The figure legend contains percent inhibition values of the isolates at pH 4.8 and 9.0 when samples at pH 7.0 were used as the reference.

Genome Assembly and Annotation

Genomic sequences were obtained from B3 and S2, as described in Materials and Methods. Final assembly and contig scaffolding resulted in a single chromosome of about 4.3 Mb and four plasmids of approximately 349 kb (plasmid 1), 376 kb (plasmid 2), 389 kb (plasmid 3), and 1.1 Mb (plasmid 4) for both isolates. The G + C content was 61.5 and 61.4% for the B3 and S2 genomes, respectively. RASTtk found 6,991 (B3) and 6,860 (S2) protein-coding genes in the genomes. However, only 36.2% (B3) and 34.1% (S2) of these genes are functionally annotated in the RASTtk database and were successfully mapped to 370 (B3) and 362 (S2) subsystems (Table 1). There were ∼46 tRNA, ∼8 rRNA, and ∼233 pseudogenes in both genomes, as well as four ncRNAs. In B3, 62 genes were predicted to be involved in nitrogen metabolism, 32 in nitrogen fixation, 1 in nitrosative stress, 11 in ammonia assimilation, and 18 in the denitrification. In S2, 67 genes are predicted to be involved in nitrogen metabolism; 2 are engaged in cyanate hydrolysis, 32 in nitrogen fixation, 1 in nitrosative stress, 11 in nitrogen assimilation, and 20 in denitrification process (Table 1). Symbiotic genes are distributed on the symbiotic plasmids and symbiotic islands on both B3 and S2 genomes. Three genes were located on the chromosome in the nitrogen fixation category, 24 on the symbiotic plasmid 3, and five on the two non-symbiotic plasmids 1 and 4. There were two clusters on the symbiotic plasmid 3, i.e., an 18-kb segment at position 308-18401 and a 97-kb segment at position 348729-445938 (Table 2).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Subsystem category enrichment analyses of the B3 and S2 genomes.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Distribution of symbiotic genes in B3 and S2 genomes.

To establish a symbiotic relationship between rhizobia and legumes, rhizobia secrete effector proteins into the host cells’ cytoplasm through various secretion systems. In the B3 and S2 genomes, type 2 (T2SS) and type 4 (T4SS) secretion systems were detected. Twenty genes of the T2SS (two pilin, tadV, two rcpC, two rcpA, hyp1, tadZ, two hyp4, two tadA, two tadB, two tadC, tadD, cpaD, and hyp5) were detected in the widespread colonization island encompassing the Tad-locus on the chromosome, plasmid 1, and plasmid 4 in both B3 and S2. T4SS consisted of vir genes (virB1-11, virC1-C2, virD1-4, virAG, and virE2), 13 pvir plasmid genes, and 11 for conjugative transfer proteins (trbB-L). T4SS genes are found on symbiotic plasmid 3 and plasmid 4.

Comparative Genomics

Pangenome Analysis

For the pangenome analyses, the genomic data from B3 and S2 were compared with R. phaseoli, R. etli, R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii, R. grahamii, R. tropici, R. esperanzea, R. laguerreae, R. leguminosarum bv. viciae, R. sullae, R. favelukesii, R. pusense, R. meliloti, and A. tumefaciens as an outgroup. Pangenome analyses of the two isolates in comparison to these reference strains identified 12,768 clusters of orthologous groups. The core genome (genes present in all taxa) had 1,867 (11.6%) gene clusters. The soft-core genome (genes present in at least 95% of all taxa in consideration) had 2,104 (13.1%) gene clusters. The shell genome (moderately conserved genes present in several taxa) had 3,481 (21.6%) gene clusters, and the cloud genome (rare genes present only in a few taxa) had 8,632 (53.7%) gene clusters. The observation that only 13.1% of genes were conserved in at least 95% of the taxa while a majority (53.7%) was either identified in only one or two genomes indicates that rhizobium genera members are highly diversified.

Orthologous Analysis of Symbiotic Genes

Nitrogen fixation genes (nif) consist of 14 orthologous groups (nifA, nifB, nifD, nifE, nifH, nifK, nifN, nifQ, nifS, nifT, nifU, nifW, nifX, and nifZ). Nodulation (nod) genes consisted of 11 gene clusters (nodA, nodB, nodC, nodD, nodF, nodI, nodL, nodN, nodQ, nodU, and nodZ), and fixation (fix) genes of 11 gene clusters: three fixA; two genes for fixB, fixH, and fixJ; and one cluster for fixL and fixQ. We observed a 100% conservation of both nif and fix genes in the genomes of isolates B3 and S3. However, of the 11 nod gene clusters detected in the 15 strains, only 81.8% were conserved in isolates B3 and S2 (Supplementary Table 1). Like in other common bean-nodulating rhizobia, the nodF and nodQ genes were missing in B3 and S2, but they were present in S. meliloti, probably for conferring host specificity to this rhizobia.

The nodD genes nodD1, nodD2, and nodD3 code for LysR-family transcriptional regulators and are highly homologous to each other. These genes in B3 and S2 were phylogenetically similar to those of other common bean-nodulating rhizobia but only distantly related to non-common bean-nodulating rhizobia. These differences among rhizobia might contribute to nodulation specificity with hosts from different legume families. The nodU and nodZ clusters in B3 and S2 might also contribute to host specificity. They were only found in strains that nodulate P. vulgaris (e.g., R. etli, R. tropicii, R. phaseoli, R. grahamii, and R. esperanzeae). The nodL gene, which was only detected in S. meliloti, is highly homologous to the non-symbiotic maltose-O-acetyl transferase genes in B3 and S2. This might indicate that the O-acetyl transferase gene evolved from nodL by duplication in S. meliloti. Another example for a gene duplication event in S. meliloti provides the evolution of nodN. Although nodN was absent in B3 and S2, a homolog of nodN, coding for a non-symbiotic MaoC dehydratase, was present in the two strains.

There were four homologous genes in the isolate S2’s nifH cluster; three were nitrogenase reductase genes, and one was an AAA family ATPase gene. AAA family ATPases are non-symbiotic genes that constitute a large protein family with multiple cell functions, including cell cycle regulation, organelle biogenesis, protein proteolysis disaggregation, and intracellular transport. Still, none of them have a direct role in rhizobia symbiosis. The close relationship of the AAA family ATPase gene to other nifH genes might also indicate that they arose from gene duplication. However, only one nifH homolog was found in the B3 genome.

Interestingly, the fix gene clusters showed a very different evolutionary trend compared to the evolution of nod and nif genes. We consistently observed various functionally similar genes forming independent gene clusters. For example, there were three clusters for fixA and fixB genes in both isolates B3 and S2. The fixA genes were phylogenetically different and in different genomic locations on the chromosome and the plasmids 1 and 4 of both strains (Table 2). This might point to convergent evolution (speciation events) of the fix genes in both strains.

Phylogenomic Relationship of the Isolates

A phylogenomic tree (Figure 5) from the pangenome matrix indicated that B3 and S2 share a close phylogenomic relationship with other common bean-nodulating rhizobia (highlighted taxa). R. phaseoli seems to be the closest to isolate S2 as they form a common sub-clade. Further, the two have the last common ancestor with isolate B3 and share a close phylogenetic relationship with R. esperanzae.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. A pangenome tree showing phylogenomic relation between isolates B3, S2, and 12 reference genomes with A. tumefaciens as outgroup. The nodes are colored per the legend in which the first value corresponds to approximate Bayes branch support values, and the second is the UFBoot support values. The node with less than 95% support (red node) was collapsed. The highlighted taxa represents common bean-nodulating rhizobia.

Orthologous Relationship Between Isolates B3, S2, and Other Three Closely Related Rhizobia

We further generated a Venn diagram to show the orthologous relationship between isolates B3, S2, and three closely related rhizobia, R. phaseoli, R. etli, and R. esperanzae (Figure 6). We found 3,662 conserved genes between B3 and R. etli, 4,080 with R. phaseoli, and 3,651 with R. esperanzae. Three thousand six hundred and twenty-seven genes were conserved between S2 and R. etli, 4,229 with R. phaseoli, and 3,677 with R. esperanzae. The new isolates share more conserved genes with R. phaseoli than any other species analyzed in this study. We postulated that the two isolates and R. phaseoli belong to the same species. To test this hypothesis, we further performed a species delimitation analysis.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. A Venn diagram showing the overlapping orthologous genes between isolates B3, S2, and three other reference rhizobia species.

Species Delimitation

We computed ANI, AAI, and dDDH for the new isolates and R. phaseoli (Table 3). ANI and AAI values greater than 95% [with orthologous fraction (OF) ≥ 0.7] mean that they belong to the same species. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization, based on genome blast distance phylogeny, mimics laboratory-based DNA–DNA hybridization, and dDDH values ≥70% indicates that the two organisms belong to the same species. These tests confirmed that isolates B3 and S2 are different strains of R. phaseoli (ANI ≥ 95%, AAI ≥ 95%, and dDDH ≥ 70%).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. ANI, AAI, dDDH, and genetic distances between isolates B3, S2, and R. phaseoli.

Synteny Analysis

A synteny block is a region in a genome spanning a series of orthologous genes co-arranged with another genome sequence with either the same or different orientation or loci. A synteny analysis provides a framework in which duplication and orientation of homologous genes are studied. Sibelia, a tool based on iterative de Bruijn graphs, can find not only synteny blocks between closely related microbial genomes but also repeated blocks within the same genome. We found 11 synteny blocks on the chromosomes of R. phaseoli, B3, and S2; two synteny blocks on each of the plasmids 1–3; and 12 synteny blocks on plasmid 4 (Figure 7). The majority (51.7%) of the synteny blocks show vital conservation of genomic sequences in R. phaseoli and isolates B3 and S2. These blocks were found in the same loci and the same orientation. However, 48.3% of them have either translocated to different loci, inverted, or were missing (Table 4).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Synteny blocks between the isolates B3, S2, and R. phaseoli. Rp, R. phaseoli; Chr, chromosome; P1–P4, plasmids 1–4.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. An analysis of synteny blocks between R. phaseoli and isolates B3 and S2.

Discussion

Common bean is undoubtedly one of the primary protein sources in developing countries (Castro-Guerrero et al., 2016). Its cultivation can immensely benefit from rhizobia inoculation by limiting the application of disastrous and expensive chemical fertilizers. However, for large-scale agricultural applications, inoculants well-adapted to the local soil conditions are necessary. Like soils in many other countries along the equator, Western Kenyan soils are characterized by pH values as low as 4.6 and often deficient phosphate concentrations. Besides, common bean suffers from high aluminum concentrations, which can be up to 9.4 Cmol/kg (Wekesa et al., 2016). Foreign rhizobia often fail to survive or do not effectively nodulate with their hosts or perform insufficient nitrogen fixation under these harsh conditions. Formulations with successful inoculants require a clear understanding of strain efficacy, adaptability to the target environment, and knowledge about the bacteria’s physical–chemical and genetic characteristics (Stephens and Rask, 2000; Xavier et al., 2004). To provide rhizobia suitable for consideration as inoculants for Western Kenyan soils, we searched for indigenous isolates and compared their symbiotic features with those of the commercially available CIAT899 inoculum used in Kenyan agriculture. For two promising candidates, physicochemical properties and genome data are provided.

Symbiotic Efficiency

Initial studies with the two indigenous isolates, B3 and S2, clearly showed that they are rhizobacteria with nitrogen fixation ability (Figure 1). Inoculated common bean plants possess greener leaves and had more biomass, nitrogen, chlorophyll, and carotenoid content than plants inoculated with CIAT899 on nitrogen-limiting conditions. Also, Ouma et al. (2016) showed that native indigenous rhizobia displayed higher symbiotic ability than commercial strains, such as CIAT899, because they are better adapted to Kenya’s local conditions. The inoculated plants’ overall phenotype compared to nitrogen-fertilized plants may suggest that—apart from fixing nitrogen—there might be other benefits for the host, such as secretion of phytohormones and relieving the plants from abiotic stress (Kevin Vessey, 2004; Hungria et al., 2013). Both strains produce higher amounts of IAA than the commercial CIAT899 inoculant (Figure 2). Rhizobacteria-produced IAA improved plant growth by several mechanisms and became an important selection criterion for the choice of commercially used inoculum (Alemneh et al., 2020; Keswani et al., 2020). A striking observation was that the isolate B3 was more efficient in phosphate solubilization in the culture media than CIAT899. This is an essential feature for rhizobia application, although its contribution to plant performance is less investigated (Concha and Doerner, 2020).

Phenotypic and Biochemical Characteristics

Commercial isolates such as CIAT899 suffer under acid soil conditions in Western Kenya, and CIAT899 was highly inhibited in the media with pH 4.8. In contrast, the indigenous isolates B3 and S2 grew in these conditions. Furthermore, B3 and S2 released acidic substances into the media, as shown by the color change of the pH indicator. Although early researchers (Jensen and Hansen, 1968) believed that acid-producing rhizobia are sensitive to acidity, later studies found this was not always the case. For instance, Cooper (1982) found that six of his acid-producing lotus rhizobia were more tolerant to acidic conditions than alkaline-producing rhizobia. This demonstrates that alkaline substance release is not a prerequisite for bacterial survival under acidic environmental conditions. We suggest that the isolates B3 and S2 have adapted their metabolic activities to the acidic environment in Western Kenyan soils. Although the biochemical and molecular basis is unknown, acid-producing bacteria grow fastest under those abiotic stress conditions (Boakye et al., 2016). Thus, they may have advantages for agricultural applications over the commercial inocula used in Kenya today and worldwide in countries with acidic soils.

Dark-grown bacteria’s inability to absorb Congo red has been used as a rhizobia-identification strategy (Nyaga and Njeru, 2020). In earlier reports, R. leguminosarum, R. trifoli, and S. meliloti absorbed Congo red (Kneen and LaRue, 1983), while the B3 and S2 isolates only partially absorbed the dye, similar to reports from Kawaka et al. (2014) for other isolates. Therefore, the use of Congo red for rhizobia indication may not be reliable, especially in the early stages of their cultivation process. However, other morphological characters specific for rhizobia were observed for B3 and S2, such as the milky white and mucoid structure, the rod-shaped and convex elevation of the colonies, and their classification as gram-negative bacteria upon staining, as reported by Somasegaran and Hoben (1994).

Protein Secretion System

Bacterial survival depends on their interactions with the environment; hence, they have evolved various mechanisms to secrete proteins (Green and Mecsas, 2016). Many secretion systems generally exist in prokaryotes, but only seven have been studied in detail (Tseng et al., 2009). Isolates B3 and S2 have T2SS and T4SS. T2SS is thought to transport various proteins and other compounds out of the cell (Green and Mecsas, 2016). Additionally, the Tad genes in the widespread colonization island were essential in forming adhesive pili in the genera Actinobacillus (Tomich et al., 2007). Therefore, it is probable that T2SS in rhizobia is involved in the formation of adhesive substances necessary for its attachment to the root hairs of its host.

T4SS, which is homologous to T3SS and T6SS, has been shown to transport effector proteins into the host cell’s cytoplasm. These effector proteins suppress the host immune system (Masson-Boivin et al., 2009) by disrupting nodulation autoregulatory processes and promoting nodulation in the host roots (Nelson and Sadowsky, 2015). The virB1-11 and virD4 genes of T4SS were identified in both B3 and S2. T4SS appear to operate also in R. phaseoli, R. etli, R. leguminosarum, R. pusense, S. meliloti, Mesorhizobium loti, and Sinorhizobium medicae (cf. Hubber et al., 2007; Sugawara et al., 2013); however, essential genes for T4SS are absent in R. grahamii and R. tropici CIAT899.

Interestingly, the genes for this secretion system are located on the symbiotic plasmids. Therefore, the T4SS secretion system’s exact function in the symbiotic interaction of B3 and S2 with common bean needs to be investigated in the future. It might be interesting to see how T4SS influences symbiosis under acidic soil conditions in Kenya.

Symbiotic Genes

An orthologous analysis suggests that gene duplication seems to be the mechanism that led to the evolution of nod genes in rhizobia. The nodD gene homologs recovered from the genomes of B3 and S2 were highly similar to other nodD genes from common bean-nodulating rhizobia and distantly related to others like the Medicago sp.-nodulating S. meliloti. However, as members of the LysR transcriptional regulator family (Peck et al., 2006), all these genes are phylogenetically similar to other members of this family that have no role in the legume–rhizobia symbiotic establishment. This might indicate the possibility of a duplication event among members of LysR regulators that later adapted differently to recognize specific flavonoids from legumes to regulate rhizobia–host specificity during legume–rhizobia symbiosis (Göttfert, 1993; Smith et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2018).

The nodL protein, a member of O-acetyl transferases, is implicated in the acetylation of nod factors (Bloemberg et al., 1994) in R. leguminosarum and S. meliloti. The nodL protein sequence is highly similar to sequences of other acetyltransferases with no function in symbiosis. In particular, nodL from S. meliloti is phylogenetically similar to the maltose-O-acetyl transferase from isolates B3 and S2. This protein acetylates glucose and maltose exclusively at the C6 position of the non-reducing end at the glucosyl moiety (Lo Leggio et al., 2003). Downie (1989) showed that the R. leguminosarum nodL gene was homologous to the acetyltransferase genes lacA and cycE.

Another example is the nodN gene in S. meliloti, homologous to MaoC family dehydratase genes detected in all other isolates investigated in this study, including B3 and S2. Most genes for MaoC domain-containing proteins are part of an operon involved in synthesizing monoamine oxidase, and proteins are involved in producing the root hair deformation (HAD) factor, specifically on Medicago. Therefore, it is possible that nodN belongs to the MaoC dehydratase family and has arisen by duplication in Medicago-nodulating rhizobia.

In contrast to nodD, the fix genes seem to have arisen from independent evolution events (speciation). Although there were multiple fixA, fixB, and fixH genes in the two isolates’ genomes, they were phylogenetically unrelated. This existence of functionally related non-homologous genes in the same genome may point to convergent evolution from unrelated genes instead of duplication events. One of the fixA clusters with no homology to any other rhizobial gene cluster was identified in B3 and S2. This may point to the possibility of a region-specific independent evolution of fix genes.

Phylogenomics and Species Delimitation

Phylogenomics and species delimitation analysis classified the two isolates B3 and S2 as members of R. phaseoli. However, the three genomes’ syntactic analysis showed possible differences in the gene order, conservation, and orientation between R. phaseoli and B3 and S2. For example, seven synteny blocks in R. phaseoli were absent in isolate B3 and two in S2. This might indicate that these regions were either lost in the genomes of B3 and S2 or inserted in the genome of R. phaseoli. We also noticed that five and four synteny blocks in B3 and S2, respectively, were translocated to different sites, as seen in R. phaseoli. Considering that these regions are long DNA sections with many genes, this can significantly impact microbial phenotype variation (Darmon and Leach, 2014). Previously, the translocation of genes was shown to modulate expression levels of prokaryotic constitutive genes due to changes in chromosomal positions (Block et al., 2012). These changes in the indigenous isolates might allow better adaption to the local edaphic factors. Genome deletion has been described in the past as one of the mechanisms of bacterial adaptation to harsh environments (Koskiniemi et al., 2012).

In conclusion, we identified two indigenous rhizobial strains in Western Kenya’s acidic soils that nodulate with the common bean. Compared to inoculation with the commercial rhizobial strain CIAT899, the indigenous rhizobia perform better under controlled greenhouse conditions. Physiological characterization of the rhizobial strains uncovered that they slightly differ; however, growth in acidic media suggests that they might be better adapted to Kenya’s soil conditions. Genome analyses identified them as different strains of R. phaseoli.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/wgs/JAAVVP01?display=contigs and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/wgs/JAAVVN01?display=contigs.

Author Contributions

CW performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. RO and AF wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was financed by the Germany Academic Exchange Service (DAAD); the National Research Fund (NRF), Kenya; and the Friedrich Schiller University of Jena. John Muoma funded the sample collection.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate smallholder farmers in Kenya for allowing sample collection from their farms. We are also thankful to Claudia Röppischer and Sarah Mußbach for the technical support they extended toward completing this project.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.697567/full#supplementary-material

References

Alemneh, A. A., Zhou, Y., Ryder, M. H., and Denton, M. D. (2020). Mechanisms in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that enhance legume–rhizobial symbioses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 129, 1133–1156. doi: 10.1111/jam.14754

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alonge, M., Soyk, S., Ramakrishnan, S., Wang, X., Goodwin, S., Sedlazeck, F. J., et al. (2019). RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol. 20, 1–17.

Google Scholar

Bardou, P., Mariette, J., Escudié, F., Djemiel, C., and Klopp, C. (2014). Jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics 15:293.

Google Scholar

Barrett, P., Hunter, J., Miller, J. T., Hsu, J. C., and Greenfield, P. (2005). “Matplotlib–A Portable Python Plotting Package,” in Proceedings of the Astronomical data Analysis Software and Systems. Pasadena, CA, 347.

Google Scholar

Beardon, E., Scholes, J., and Ton, J. (2014). 11 How do beneficial microbes induce systemic resistance? Induced Resist. Plant Defense 232.

Google Scholar

Beck, D. P., Materon, L. A., and Afandi, F. (1993). Practical Rhizobium-Legume Technology Manual; Manual. Aleppo: International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, 1–245.

Google Scholar

Bilbao, B., Giraldo, D., and Hevia, P. (1999). Quantitative determination of nitrogen content in plant tissue by a colorimetric method. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 30, 1997–2005. doi: 10.1080/00103629909370348

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Block, D. H., Hussein, R., Liang, L. W., and Lim, H. N. (2012). Regulatory consequences of gene translocation in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 8979–8992. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bloemberg, G. V., Thomas-Oates, J. E., Lugtenberg, B. J., and Spaink, H. P. (1994). Nodulation protein NodL of rhizobium leguminosarum O-acetylates lipo-oligosaccharides, chitin fragments and N-acetylglucosamine vitro. Mol. Microbiol. 11, 793–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00357.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boakye, E. Y., Lawson, I. Y. D., and Danso, S. K. A. (2016). Characterization and diversity of rhizobia nodulating selected tree legumes in Ghana. Symbiosis 69, 89–99. doi: 10.1007/s13199-016-0383-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brettin, T., Davis, J. J., Disz, T., Edwards, R. A., Gerdes, S., Olsen, G. J., et al. (2015). RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 5:8365.

Google Scholar

Castro-Guerrero, N. A., Isidra-Arellano, M. C., Mendoza-Cozatl, D. G., and Valdés-López, O. (2016). Common bean: a legume model on the rise for unraveling responses and adaptations to iron, zinc, and phosphate deficiencies. Front. Plant Sci. 7:600. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coico, R. (2006). Gram staining. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. Appendix 3:Aendix3C.

Google Scholar

Concha, C., and Doerner, P. (2020). The impact of the rhizobia–legume symbiosis on host root system architecture. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 3902–3921. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Contreras-Moreira, B., and Vinuesa, P. (2013). Get_homologues, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 7696–7701. doi: 10.1128/aem.02411-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cooper, J. E. (1982). Acid production, acid tolerance and growth rate of lotus rhizobia in laboratory media. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 127–131. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(82)90055-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darmon, E., and Leach, D. R. (2014). Bacterial genome instability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 1–39. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00035-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Downie, J. A. (1989). The nodL gene from rhizobium leguminosarum is homologous to the acetyl transferases encoded by lacA and cysE. Mol. Microbiol. 3, 1649–1651. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00150.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duku, C., Groot, A., Demissie, T., Muhwanga, J., Nzoka, O., and Recha, J. (2020). Common Beans Kenya: Climate Risk Assessment. Arnhem: Climate Resilient Agribusiness for Tomorrow (CRAFT).

Google Scholar

Dupree, M. R., and Wilcox, G. A. R. Y. (1977). Bromothymol blue and carbohydrate-sensitive plating media. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6, 343–347. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.343-347.1977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbert, S., Xu, J., Acosta, K., Poulev, A., Lebeis, S., and Lam, E. (2018). Bacterial production of indole related compounds reveals their role in association between duckweeds and endophytes. Front. Chem. 6:265. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Göttfert, M. (1993). Regulation and function of rhizobial nodulation genes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 10, 39–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb05863.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Green, E. R., and Mecsas, J. (2016). “Bacterial secretion systems: an overview,” in Virulence Mechanical Bacterial Pathogens, eds I. T. Indira, N. A. Cornick, P. J. Plummer, Q. Zhang, T. L. Nicholoson, J. P. Bannantine, et al. (Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology), 213–239. doi: 10.1128/9781555819286.ch8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, X., Taghavi, S., Xie, P., Orbach, M. J., Alwathnani, H. A., and Wei, G. (2014). Phytoremediation of heavy and transition metals aided by legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Int. J. Phytoremediation 16, 179–202. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2013.773273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hubber, A. M., Sullivan, J. T., and Ronson, C. W. (2007). Symbiosis-induced cascade regulation of the mesorhizobium loti R7A virB/D4 type IV secretion system. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 255–261. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-20-3-0255

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hungria, M., Nogueira, M. A., and Araujo, R. S. (2013). Co-inoculation of soybean and common bean with rhizobia and azospirilla: strategies to improve sustainability. Biol. Fertil. Soils 49, 791–801. doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0771-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., and Aluru, S. (2018). High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9:5114.

Google Scholar

Jensen, H. L., and Hansen, A. L. (1968). Observations on host plant relations in root nodule bacteria of the lotus-anthyllis and the lupinus-ornithopus groups. Acta Agric. Scand. 18, 135–142. doi: 10.1080/00015126809433168

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K., Von Haeseler, A., and Jermiin, L. S. (2017). ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katungi, E., Farrow, A., Chianu, J., Sperling, L., and Beebe, S. (2009). Common Bean in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Situation and Outlook Analysis. Ibadan: IITA, 61.

Google Scholar

Kawaka, F., Dida, M. M., Opala, P. A., Ombori, O., Maingi, J., and Muoma, J. (2014). Symbiotic efficiency of native rhizobia nodulating common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in soils of Western Kenya. Int. Sch. Res. Notices 2014:258497.

Google Scholar

Keswani, C., Singh, S. P., Cueto, L., García-Estrada, C., Mezaache-Aichour, S., Glare, T. R., et al. (2020). Auxins of microbial origin and their use in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 8549–8565. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10890-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kevin Vessey, J. (2004). Benefits of inoculating legume crops with rhizobia in the northern great plains. Crop Manag. 3, 1–8. doi: 10.1094/cm-2004-0301-04-rv

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khonje, D. J. (1989). “Adoption of the rhizobium inoculation technology for pasture improvement in sub-Saharan Africa,” in Proceedings of Utilization of Research Results on Forage and Agricultural by-Product Materials as Animal Feed Resources in Africa, eds B. H. Dzowela, A. N. Said, A. Wendem-Agenebu, and J. A. Kategile (Lilongwe: PANESA). doi: 10.1079/9781780644011.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kneen, B. E., and LaRue, T. A. (1983). Congo red absorption by Rhizobium leguminosarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 340–342.

Google Scholar

Koskiniemi, S., Sun, S., Berg, O. G., and Andersson, D. I. (2012). Selection-driven gene loss in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kristensen, D. M., Kannan, L., Coleman, M. K., Wolf, Y. I., Sorokin, A., Koonin, E. V., et al. (2010). A low-polynomial algorithm for assembling clusters of orthologous groups from intergenomic symmetric best matches. Bioinformatics 26, 1481–1487. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, I., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., et al. (2009). Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., and Roos, D. S. (2003). OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178–2189. doi: 10.1101/gr.1224503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Zhang, C., Yang, J., Yu, N., and Wang, E. (2018). Hormone modulation of legume-rhizobial symbiosis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 60, 632–648. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lo Leggio, L., Dal Degan, F., Poulsen, P., Andersen, S. M., and Larsen, S. (2003). The structure and specificity of Escherichia coli maltose acetyltransferase give new insight into the LacA family of acyltransferases. Biochemistry 42, 5225–5235. doi: 10.1021/bi0271446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mabrouk, Y., Hemissi, I., Salem, I. B., Mejri, S., Saidi, M., and Belhadj, O. (2018). Potential of rhizobia in improving nitrogen fixation and yields of legumes. Symbiosis 107:73495.

Google Scholar

Masson-Boivin, C., Giraud, E., Perret, X., and Batut, J. (2009). Establishing nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes: how many rhizobium recipes? Trends Microbiol. 17, 458–466. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathu, S., Herrmann, L., Pypers, P., Matiru, V., Mwirichia, R., and Lesueur, D. (2012). Potential of indigenous bradyrhizobia versus commercial inoculants to improve cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp.) and green gram (Vigna radiata L. wilczek.) yields in Kenya. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 58, 750–763. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2012.741041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Klenk, H. P., and Göker, M. (2014). Taxonomic use of DNA G+ C content and DNA–DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int. J. Syst. Evol. 64, 352–356. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.056994-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Minkin, I., Patel, A., Kolmogorov, M., Vyahhi, N., and Pham, S. (2013). “Sibelia: a scalable and comprehensive synteny block generation tool for closely related microbial genomes,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics, (Berlin: Springer), 215–229. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40453-5_17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, A. K., and Singh, S. (2006). Protection against salt toxicity in Azolla pinnata-Anabaena azollae symbiotic association by using combined-N sources. Acta Biol. Hung. 57, 355–365. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.57.2006.3.9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mungai, N. W., and Karubiu, N. M. (2011). Effectiveness of rhizobia isolates from Njoro soils (Kenya) and commercial inoculants in nodulation of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 12.

Google Scholar

Murphy, J. A. M. E. S., and Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 27, 31–36. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)88444-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mwenda, G. M., O’Hara, G. W., De Meyer, S. E., Howieson, J. G., and Terpolilli, J. J. (2018). Genetic diversity and symbiotic effectiveness of phaseolus vulgaris-nodulating rhizobia in Kenya. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 41, 291–299. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nadri, M. H., Salim, Y., Basar, N., Yahya, A., and Zulkifli, R. M. (2014). Antioxidant activities and tyrosinase inhibition effects of phaleria macrocarpa extracts. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 11, 107–111. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v11i3.16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nautiyal, C. S. (1999). An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170, 265–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, M. S., and Sadowsky, M. J. (2015). Secretion systems and signal exchange between nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and legumes. Front. Plant Sci. 6:491.

Google Scholar

Nyaga, J. W., and Njeru, E. M. (2020). Potential of native rhizobia to improve cowpea growth and production in semi-arid regions of Kenya. Front. Agron. 2:28. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2020.606293

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Onim, J. F. M. (1993). “Dual-purpose goat research in western Kenya, Future of Livestock Industries in East and Southern Africa” in Proceedings of the Workshop Held at Kadoma Ranch Hotel, Zimbabwe, 20-23 July 1992, eds J. A. Kategile and S. Mubi (Nairobi: ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD)).

Google Scholar

Ouma, E. W., Asango, A. M., Maingi, J., and Njeru, E. M. (2016). Elucidating the potential of native rhizobial isolates to improve biological nitrogen fixation and growth of common bean and soybean in smallholder farming systems of Kenya. Int. J. Agron. 2016:4569241.

Google Scholar

Parkers, D. (2014). CompareM [Source code]. Available online at: https://github.com/dparks1134/CompareM. (assessed January 12, 2021).

Google Scholar

Peck, M. C., Fisher, R. F., and Long, S. R. (2006). Diverse flavonoids stimulate NodD1 binding to nod gene promoters in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 188, 5417–5427. doi: 10.1128/jb.00376-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pikovskaya, R. I. (1948). Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 17, 362–370.

Google Scholar

Porra, R. J., Thompson, W. A., and Kriedelman, P. E. (1989). Determination of accurate extraction and simultaneously equation for assaying chlorophyll a and b extracted with different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 975, 384–394. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(89)80347-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rambaut, A. (2012). FigTree v1. 4.

Google Scholar

Romero-Arenas, O., Damián-Huato, M. A., Rivera-Tapia, J. A., Báez-Simón, A., Huerta-Lara, M., and Cabrera-Huerta, E. (2013). The nutritional value of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and its importance for feeding of rural communities in Puebla. Mexico. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2, 59–65.

Google Scholar

Sarker, S., Hussain, M. S., Khatun, A., Hossain, M. A., Alam, M. K., and Hossain, M. S. (2014). Development of gamma-irradiated low microbial vegetable salads for immunocompromised patients. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 15, 203–219.

Google Scholar

Savci, S. (2012). An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizer. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 3:73. doi: 10.7763/ijesd.2012.v3.191

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seabold, S., and Perktold, J. (2010). “Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python,” in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. Austin, TX, 61.

Google Scholar

Seemann, T. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simon, Z., Mtei, K., Gessesse, A., and Ndakidemi, P. A. (2014). Isolation and characterization of nitrogen fixing Rhizobia from cultivated and uncultivated soils of northern Tanzania. Am. J. Plant Sci. 5:4050. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.526423

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simpson, J. T., Wong, K., Jackman, S. D., Schein, J. E., Jones, S. J., and Birol, I. (2009). ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19, 1117–1123. doi: 10.1101/gr.089532.108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, D. L., Praslickova, D., and Ilangumaran, G. (2015). Inter-organismal signaling and management of the phytomicrobiome. Front. Plant Sci. 6:722. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Somasegaran, P., and Hoben, H. J. (1994). “Quantifying the growth of rhizobia,” in Handbook for Rhizobia, (New York, NY: Springer), 47–57.

Google Scholar

Somasegaran, P., and Hoben, H. J. (2012). Handbook for Rhizobia, Methods in Legume-Rhizobium Technology. (New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media).

Google Scholar

Stephens, J. H. G., and Rask, H. M. (2000). Inoculant production and formulation. Field Crops Res. 65, 249–258. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4290(99)00090-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sugawara, M., Epstein, B., Badgley, B. D., Unno, T., Xu, L., Reese, J., et al. (2013). Comparative genomics of the core and accessory genomes of 48 Sinorhizobium strains comprising five genospecies. Genome Biol. 14, 1–20. doi: 10.1089/omi.1.1999.4.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tatusova, T., DiCuccio, M., Badretdin, A., Chetvernin, V., Nawrocki, E. P., Zaslavsky, L., et al. (2016). NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomich, M., Planet, P. J., and Figurski, D. H. (2007). The tad locus: postcards from the widespread colonization island. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 363–375. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trung, B. C., and Yoshida, S. (1983). Improvement of Leonard jar assembly for screening of effective Rhizobium. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 29, 97–100. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1983.10432410

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tseng, T. T., Tyler, B. M., and Setubal, J. C. (2009). Protein secretion systems in bacterial-host associations, and their description in the gene ontology. BMC Microbiol. 1(Suppl. 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-S1-S2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vinuesa, P., Ochoa-Sánchez, L. E., and Contreras-Moreira, B. (2018). GET_PHYLOMARKERS, a software package to select optimal orthologous clusters for phylogenomics and inferring pan-genome phylogenies, used for a critical geno-taxonomic revision of the genus Stenotrophomonas. Front. Microbiol. 9:771. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wekesa, C. S., Okun, D., Juma, K., Shitabule, D., Okoth, P., and Muoma, J. (2016). Abundance and symbiotic potential of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) nodule associated bacteria in western Kenya soil. J. Agric. Sci. 1, 1–9. doi: 10.13188/2331-8996.1000018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L., and Holt, K. E. (2017). Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilson, K. (2001). Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 56, 2–4.

Google Scholar

Xavier, I. J., Holloway, G., and Leggett, M. (2004). Development of rhizobial inoculant formulations. Crop Manag. 3, 1–6. doi: 10.1094/cm-2004-0301-06-rv

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: rhizobia, comparative genomics, nitrogen fixation, common bean, Rhizobium phaseoli, pangenome, synteny blocks, species delimitation

Citation: Wekesa CS, Furch ACU and Oelmüller R (2021) Isolation and Characterization of High-Efficiency Rhizobia From Western Kenya Nodulating With Common Bean. Front. Microbiol. 12:697567. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.697567

Received: 19 April 2021; Accepted: 12 August 2021;
Published: 10 September 2021.

Edited by:

Amparo Latorre, University of Valencia, Spain

Reviewed by:

Clarisse Brígido, University of Évora, Portugal
Mario Andrade Lira Junior, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Brazil

Copyright © 2021 Wekesa, Furch and Oelmüller. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ralf Oelmüller, ralf.oelmueller@uni-jena.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.