Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 18 February 2021
Sec. Food Microbiology

Establishment and Application of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Detection of Shewanella Genus

\r\nKeyi Yu,Keyi Yu1,2Zhenzhou Huang,Zhenzhou Huang1,2Ying LiYing Li3Qingbo FuQingbo Fu4Lirong LinLirong Lin4Shiyao WuShiyao Wu4Hang Dai,Hang Dai1,2Hongyan Cai,Hongyan Cai1,2Yue Xiao,Yue Xiao1,2Ruiting LanRuiting Lan5Duochun Wang,*Duochun Wang1,2*
  • 1National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC), State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
  • 2Center for Human Pathogenic Culture Collection, China CDC, Beijing, China
  • 3Workstation for Microbial Infectious Disease, Shunyi District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 4Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China
  • 5School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Shewanella species are widely distributed in the aquatic environment and aquatic organisms. They are opportunistic human pathogens with increasing clinical infections reported in recent years. However, there is a lack of a rapid and accurate method to identify Shewanella species. We evaluated here matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for rapid identification of Shewanella. A peptide mass reference spectra (PMRS) database was constructed for the type strains of 36 Shewanella species. The main spectrum projection (MSP) cluster dendrogram showed that the type strains of Shewanella species can be effectively distinguished according to the different MS fingerprinting. The PMRS database was validated using 125 Shewanella test strains isolated from various sources and periods; 92.8% (n = 116) of the strains were correctly identified at the species level, compared with the results of multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), which was previously shown to be a method for identifying Shewanella at the species level. The misidentified strains (n = 9) by MALDI-TOF MS involved five species of two groups, i.e., Shewanella algaeShewanella chilikensisShewanella indica and Shewanella seohaensisShewanella xiamenensis. We then identified and defined species-specific biomarker peaks of the 36 species using the type strains and validated these selected biomarkers using 125 test strains. Our study demonstrated that MALDI-TOF MS was a reliable and powerful tool for the rapid identification of Shewanella strains at the species level.

Introduction

The genus Shewanella comprises a group of oxidase-, catalase-, and ornithine decarboxylase-positive and H2S-producing, facultative anaerobic bacteria with a wide distribution in the environment. It plays an important ecological role in many fields such as materials engineering, environmental engineering (Zou et al., 2018), and marine biology (Gorby et al., 2006; Fredrickson et al., 2008; Kouzuma et al., 2015; Daeffler et al., 2017). However, Shewanella is a common source of food spoilage bacteria, in particular seafood; and Shewanella contamination of foods during food processing and storage adversely affects the production, transportation, and sales (Hau and Gralnick, 2007; McLean et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Janda and Abbott, 2014). Shewanella is also an opportunistic pathogen of humans (Erfanmanesh et al., 2019). Through occupational or recreational activities, exposure to the marine environment containing Shewanella or ingestion of marine organisms contaminated by Shewanella (Janda and Abbott, 2014) may cause a range of infections including skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), invasive diseases, hepatobiliary diseases, otitis media and associated sequelae, and other infections (Janda and Abbott, 2014). Some studies have shown that SSTI is the most common clinical features of Shewanella infection, including cellulitis, abscess, or necrotizing fasciitis (Yousfi et al., 2017). In recent years, Shewanella has been isolated from more and more clinical specimens (Janda and Abbott, 2014).

The genus of Shewanella has a high diversity with more than 70 species reported so far1. An efficient and accurate method for the identification of Shewanella species is still lacking. Traditional methods are mainly based on phenotypic tests combined with biochemical identification, which is time-consuming, laborious, and even inaccurate. The widely used 16S rRNA gene as bacterial species identification tool (Yarza et al., 2014) has been found to lack the power to identify Shewanella at the species level (Sun et al., 2013; Glaeser and Kämpfer, 2015). The housekeeping gene gyrB was found to have a higher resolution than 16S rRNA for Shewanella species identification (Bozal et al., 2002; Miyazaki et al., 2006; Sung et al., 2012), but no standardized cutoff value has been established for the identification (Bozal et al., 2002; Miyazaki et al., 2006; Sung et al., 2012). We previously established that the method of multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) can accurately identify Shewanella at the species level (Fang et al., 2019). This method requires PCR and sequencing of six housekeeping genes from each isolate, which is time-consuming and costly. Thus, the method is unsuitable for clinical diagnostic laboratories.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has become a powerful technology for rapid microbial identification in recent years. It has a short turnaround time for species identification to enable targeted treatment. The principle of MALDI-TOF MS based on species identification is that each species has its characteristic MS spectra that provide a good resolution for differentiation of bacteria at the species level (van Belkum et al., 2015). MALDI-TOF MS has been rapidly developed and widely used in clinical laboratories (Angeletti, 2017; Schubert and Kostrzewa, 2017), due to its advantages of convenient sample preparation, simple experimental operation, and high identification accuracy (Samantha et al., 2018). A key requirement of MALDI-TOF MS based on species identification is a specific and accurate spectra database (Jang and Kim, 2018), which must be established for the targeted species.

The objectives of this study were to establish a peptide mass reference spectra (PMRS) database of Shewanella species by MALDI-TOF MS and to validate the effectiveness of MALDI-TOF MS and the database for identifying Shewanella species, using type strains of 36 species and 125 test strains derived from clinical, environmental, and food samples.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Cultivation Methods

A total of 161 Shewanella strains were used in this study including 36 type strains and 125 test strains. All type strains were sourced from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC), the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures [Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ)], the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM), the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC), the Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms (BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection), and the Marine Culture Collection of China (MCCC). Detailed information of type strains is listed in Table 1. The three non-Shewanella strains, namely, Vibrio cholerae N16961, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 09MAS0023, and Aeromonas hydrophila 2247, were sourced from Center for Human Pathogenic Culture Collection (CHPC). The test strains were isolated from different sources in China, during years 2007–2020, including clinical (n = 75), food (n = 39), and environmental (n = 11) isolates. The 36 Shewanella type strains were incubated on marine agar 2216E at suitable temperatures according to the protocols provided by each pathogen culture collection center. The test strains were identified by API20E (bioMérieux SA) according to instrument of manufactory and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h for subsequent identifications. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used for the calibration of the instrument.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Detailed information of 36 Shewanella type strains.

Sample Preparation for Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight MS

An ethanol/formic acid method was used for protein extraction (Anja and Sascha, 2009). One loop of fresh bacterial culture was thoroughly suspended in 300 μl of ultrapure water, and then 900 μl of absolute ethanol was added. The mixtures were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 5 min. Then the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was allowed to dry at room temperature. Next, equal volumes of 70% formic acid and acetonitrile were added to the pellet in sequence. After the pellet was well suspended, it was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 3 min, and the whole cell extracts were transferred to a clean tube. The matrix solution consisted of acetonitrile (500 μl), ultrapure water (475 μl), trifluoroacetic acid (25 μl), and supersaturated α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China). One microliter of the protein extracts was spotted onto a 96-well target plate (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China). Each spot was overlaid with 1 μl of matrix solution and allowed to dry at room temperature.

Parameter Setting, Spectrum Generation, and Identification

Mass spectrometry analysis was performed using MALDI-TOF MS EXS3000 (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China). MS spectra were obtained in linear mode within a range of 2,000–20,000 Da. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used for mass calibration and instrument parameter optimization, to make the average deviation of molecular weight less than 300 ppm after correction. MS data were analyzed by MDT Master (version 1.1). As specified by the manufacturer’s instructions, log scores ≥2.0 were accepted for the identification at the species level, and log scores <2.0 and ≥1.7 were taken as the identification at the genus level or the presumptive species level identification. Log scores below 1.7 were considered unreliable.

Each sample was coated with 12 targets. At least 24 high-quality spectra with stable baseline, abundant protein peaks and even distribution were selected. The software of iDBac (version 1.1.10) was used to create the dendrogram based on the main spectrum projection (MSP), using the algorithm of unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA). Three non-Shewanella strains were included as controls.

Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Shewanella Test Strains

Genomic DNAs were extracted according to the standardized instructions of the DNA extraction kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Six single-copy housekeeping genes (gyrA, gyrB, infB, recN, rpoA, and topA) were selected according to previous studies (Fang et al., 2019). Housekeeping genes of the 36 type strains were obtained from GenBank (Supplementary Table 1). DNAStar software was used to join the upstream and downstream sequences. MEGA 6.06 was used to compare the concatenated sequences and build the neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree. In terms of parameter setting of the evolutionary tree, Kimura’s two-parameter model with the pairwise-deletion option was used. The robustness of tree topologies was evaluated with 1,000 bootstrap replications, and values >70% were shown at the nodes of the branches.

Analysis of Specific Biomarker Peaks in Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry analysis was performed using the MDT Master software to calculate the height and area of spectrum peaks, and Welch’s t test was used to determine peaks with statistical differences. Finally, an output file was generated. The peaks with relative signal intensity greater than 2% were extracted, and normality test (W test) was performed on the distribution of the peaks. Next, Kruskal–Wallis H test (when P-value < 0.1 in the W test) was used to test pairwise difference of the peak distribution between strains. In all cases, P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The spectra peaks from different type strains were collected together, and non-redundant candidate species-specific biomarker peaks were computed for the 36 Shewanella species using MDT Master software.

Results

Construction of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight MS Database for Shewanella Genus

In this study, the PMRS database containing 36 type strains of different Shewanella species was constructed. About 100 peaks were detected in the MS fingerprinting of each strain, where a large majority of the peaks were concentrated in the range of 3,000–10,000 m/z. The dendrogram based on MSP of 36 Shewanella showed long terminal branches that separate species from the nearest counterparts (Figure 1), and the variance of peaks distribution between branches ranged from 33.9% (S. marinintestinaS. pneumatophore) to 84.5% (S. aestuarii). As the only genus in the family of Shewanellaceae, there was large difference in spectra between Shewanella and its closely related genera, which were considered as outgroups. No misidentification was observed at the genus level. The 36 type strains of different Shewanella species were divided into six clades, using the 77.6% difference in MSP as the cutoff value. The clade of Algae, Gelidii, Aquimarina, and Putrefaciens included multiple species, while S. aestuarii and S. hanedai were well separated as single species clades from the other clades.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Dendrogram of the cluster analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectra. The scale below the dendrogram represents the degree of difference in the mass spectrometry fingerprinting of the 36 Shewanella type strains, and the difference level reflects the relationship between each other, with the value between 0 and 1. With the main spectrum projection (MSP) similarity of 77.6% as the critical value, 36 type strains of Shewanella were divided into six groups. Among them, Algae, Gelidii, Aquimarina, and Putrefaciens included multiple type strains (species); S. aestuarii and S. hanedai stood separately in their own clade.

Species Identification of Test Strains by Multilocus Sequence Analysis

Multilocus sequence analysis was used to provide a reference identification of all test strains. The concatenated sequences data were used to construct a phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). The test strains were clustered with type strains for unambiguous species identification. Among the 125 strains, 83 (66.4%) were S. algae, 15 (12.0%) S. chilikensis, 13 (10.4%) S. indica, 9 (7.2%) S. xiamenensis, 3 (2.4%) S. seohaensis, and 2 (1.6%) S. carassii. Except for S. seohaensis with all isolates from environmental specimens, the other five species contained isolates from clinical samples.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed based on six concatenated gene sequences [gyrA, gyrB, infB, recN, rpoA, and topA (4,191 bp)] of 36 Shewanella type strains and 125 test strains (by the neighbor-joining method). Each black triangle contains the test strains of the same species, and the number of test strains is shown in brackets. Numbers on branches are bootstrap values in percentage from 1000 replicates.

Species Identification of Test Strains by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight MS

Under the condition of signal-to-noise ratio >3.0, approximately 100 peaks were detected in the range of 2,000 – 20,000 m/z. When identifying the test strains, online comparison searches were performed against an expanded database (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China, containing the Shewanella PMRS database). The final MALDI-TOF MS identification results for the 125 test strains were S. algae (n = 87), followed by S. chilikensis (n = 14), S. indica (n = 10), S. xiamenensis (n = 8), S. seohaensis (n = 4), and S. carassii (n = 2).

Comparison of Results Between Multilocus Sequence Analysis and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight MS

Since MLSA has been confirmed to be accurate for identifying Shewanella at the species level (Fang et al., 2019), all 125 test strains were analyzed by MLSA, and the results were used to evaluate the effectiveness of MALDI-TOF MS for species identification. Taking the MLSA identification results as the “true species identity” of a test strain, all strains were identified correctly at the genus level, and 116 (92.8%) of the test strains were accurately identified at the species level. Nine strains were misidentified by MALDI-TOF MS, involving five species of two groups, i.e., S. algaeS. chilikensis–S. indica and S. seohaensisS. xiamenensis. More specifically, one S. algae strain was misidentified as S. chilikensis, while the two S. chilikensis strains and the three S. indica strains were wrongly identified as S. algae; two strains of S. xiamenensis were misidentified as S. seohaensis, and one strain of S. seohaensis was wrongly identified as S. xiamenensis (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Comparison of identification between multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for 125 test strains. Different colors represent different Shewanella species.

Analysis of Potential Species-Specific Biomarker Peaks

Due to the misidentification of nine strains by MALDI-TOF MS, we analyzed the spectra data of the type strains to determine whether there are potential species-specific biomarker peaks that can be used to improve the accuracy. The output file of peak intensity for different type strains was generated by MDT Master Software. After the mass spectrum peaks with relative intensity < 2% were removed, the remaining peaks were collected for further analysis. Owing to the non-normal data, P < 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis H test) was considered significant in peak distribution. Biomarker peaks were detected using peak lists among 36 type strains (Table 2), and 125 test strains were examined for verification. The potential species-specific biomarker peaks were located within the range of 2,000–12,000 m/z. The nine wrongly identified strains were correctly identified at the species level by using the biomarker peaks. An average of eight species-specific peaks was found for each type strain, while S. aestuarii JCM 17801T harbored 21 specific peaks, higher than the average amount. Furthermore, S. aestuarii, S. aquimarina, S. baltica, S. carassii, and S. gaetbuli type strains harbored multiple specific peaks in a relative-low range (2,000–3,000 m/z). In the comparison of MS fingerprinting among S. algaeS. chilikensisS. indica, the specific peaks were 10,065 m/z (S. algae), 3,307 m/z (S. chilikensis), and 4,827 m/z (S. indica) (Figure 4A). Similarly, for the S. xiamenensisS. seohaensis group, the peak with 4,221 m/z only appeared in S. xiamenensis, while peaks of 3,778 m/z and 9,574 m/z were present in S. seohaensis (Figure 4B).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Species-specific biomarker peaks of 36 Shewanella type strains.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) spectra of the five species displayed in the MDT Master: (A) (a) Peak at 10,065 m/z of S. algae compared with S. chilikensis and S. indica; (b) comparison of peak at 3,307 m/z belonging to S. chilikensis to S. algae, S. indica, respectively. (c) Different distribution of peak at 4,827 m/z belonging S. indica compared with S. algae and S. chilikensis. (B) Different distribution of peaks at 4,221, 3,778, and 9,574 m/z between S. xiamenensis and S. seohaensis.

Discussion

Multiple Shewanella species are frequently isolated from food products and clinical specimens as opportunistic pathogens (Pagani et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2013; Janda and Abbott, 2014). Commercial systems, such as Vitek and MALDI-TOF MS (bioMérieux, Bruker), are available for species identification in clinical laboratories (Regoui et al., 2020; Sánchez-Juanes et al., 2020). However, only a few species, like S. putrefaciens and S. algae, were recorded in the database (Liu et al., 2013; Janda and Abbott, 2014; Zhang et al., 2018). Several other Shewanella species have often been misidentified by biochemical tests or MALDI-TOF MS (Byun et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018). Therefore, we urgently need an expanded database to identify Shewanella species correctly.

MALDI-TOF MS has revolutionized the routine identification of microorganisms in clinical laboratories by introducing a simple, rapid, high-throughput, and low-cost technology (O’Connor et al., 2016; Bao et al., 2018). The two key requirements of MALDI-TOF MS microbial identification are the species coverage in the database and the representativeness of bacterial diversity used for the database construction (Rodriguez-Temporal et al., 2017; Honnavar et al., 2018; Paul et al., 2019).

In this study, the PMRS database included the type strains of 36 Shewanella species for MALDI-TOF MS identification at both genus and species levels. The MSP dendrogram was used to evaluate the distance and relationship of the type strains that represent the 36 Shewanella species. The tree topology confirmed that each species is well separated. The previously recognized clades, i.e., Algae, Gelidii, Aquimarina, and Putrefaciens, were also grouped together respectively as expected, confirming the spectra contained sufficient signal for species identification. The identification accuracy of the MALDI-TOF MS was validated using 125 test strains, the species identity of which were confirmed by MLSA. The 125 test strains analyzed belonged to six different species, namely, S. algae, S. chilikensis, S. indica, S. xiamenensis, S. seohaensis, and S. carassii. Thus, we can confidently conclude that the MALDI-TOF MS method developed here is capable of identifying Shewanella species. Although there are over 70 Shewanella species and other species remain to be tested, these six species are the most commonly isolated species from clinical samples, and other species are relatively rare (Zhang et al., 2018). The testing of other 30 Shewanella species included in this database and additional species not included in this study will further expand the utility of this method.

However, in our study, nine out of 125 strains were misidentified. These nine isolates belonged to five species, which were divided into two groups, S. algaeS. chilikensisS. indica and S. xiamenensisS. seohaensis. The strains of each group shared the most recent common ancestor in the MLSA phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), suggesting a close evolutionary relationship of the species within each group. The close relatedness is likely to be the cause of the misidentification, as MALDI-TOF MS primarily uses main peaks represented by ribosomal proteins in the spectrum for strain identification (Ryzhov and Fenselau, 2001; Bremer and Dennis, 2008; Nakamura et al., 2016). It is known to be difficult to distinguish by MALDI-TOF MS Shigella spp. from E. coli (Wieser et al., 2012), Brucella melitensis from Ochrobactrum anthropi (Poonawala et al., 2018), and some species within the genus Bacillus (McLaughlin et al., 2014), as there is very little difference between them in the spectra of ribosomal proteins.

In order to overcome the limitations of MALDI-TOF MS in differentiating closely related species, potential species-specific biomarker peaks were found to be useful. Peaks in the range of 2,000–20,000 m/z are more likely to be ribosomal proteins that are discriminatory at the species level. Ha et al. (2019) successfully applied low-mass profiling to identify species-specific mass peaks for the identification of two genetically closely related Bacillus species. In this study, we took a similar approach and identified species-associated biomarker peaks based on the type strains, validated using the 125 test strains. With the use of the species biomarker peaks, nine misidentified test strains can be accurately identified at the species level. We identified 2–21 species-associated biomarkers for the species level identification. However, it should be noted that these species-associated biomarkers were identified based on one type strain; and thus when more strains of a given species are included, some of these markers may become variable within a species or non-species specific. For the species with multiple test strains available, the species-associated biomarker appears to be species specific.

Conclusion

The establishment of the PMRS library provides the technical basis for the detection and identification of Shewanella species that are relevant to food safety and clinical disease. The study revealed that MALDI-TOF MS could be a fast and relatively inexpensive method for the identification of the Shewanella genus. Species-specific biomarker peaks were identified and employed to improve the identifications at the species level. MALDI-TOF MS can effectively replace traditional identification methods for the identification of Shewanella.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

DW designed the work. KY and ZH performed the experiments. KY, ZH, YL, QF, LL, SW, HD, HC, and YX collected the samples and isolated strains. KY, ZH, and RL wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Sci-Tech Key Project (2018ZX10102001 and 2018ZX10734404) from the National Health Commission, China and the National Science and Technology Infrastructure of China (National Pathogen Resource Center-NPRC-32).

Conflict of Interest

QF, LL, and SW were employed by the company Zybio Inc. Chongqing, China.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.625821/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

  1. ^ http://www.bacterio.net/shewanella.html

References

Angeletti, S. (2017). Matrix assisted laser desorption time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in clinical microbiology. J. Microbiol. Methods 138, 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anja, F., and Sascha, S. (2009). Phylogenetic classification and identification of bacteria by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 4, 732–742. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.37

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bao, J. R., Master, R. N., Azad, K. N., Schwab, D. A., Clark, R. B., Jones, R. S., et al. (2018). Rapid, accurate identification of candida auris by using a novel matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) database (Library). J. Clin. Microbiol. 56, e1700–e1717.

Google Scholar

Bozal, N., Montes, M. J., Tudela, E., Jiménez, F., and Guinea, J. (2002). Shewanella frigidimarina and Shewanella livingstonensis sp. nov. isolated from Antarctic coastal areas. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 195–205. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-1-195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bremer, H., and Dennis, P. P. (2008). Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell at different exponential growth rates. EcoSal. Plus 3. doi: 10.1128/ecosal.5.2.3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Byun, J. H., Park, H., and Kim, S. (2017). The phantom menace for patients with hepatobiliary diseases: Shewanella haliotis, often misidentified as Shewanella algae in biochemical tests and MALDI-TOF analysis. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 70, 177–180. doi: 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2015.658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daeffler, K. N., Galley, J. D., Sheth, R. U., Ortiz-Velez, L. C., Bibb, C. O., Shroyer, N. F., et al. (2017). Engineering bacterial thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors for detecting gut inflammation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13:923. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167416

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erfanmanesh, A., Beikzadeh, B., Aziz Mohseni, F., Nikaein, D., and Mohajerfar, T. (2019). Ulcerative dermatitis in barramundi due to coinfection with Streptococcus iniae and Shewanella algae. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 134, 89–97. doi: 10.3354/dao03363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Dai, H., Cai, H., Li, Z., et al. (2019). Multilocus sequence analysis, a rapid and accurate tool for taxonomic classification, evolutionary relationship determination, and population biology studies of the genus Shewanella. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85:e3126-18.

Google Scholar

Fredrickson, J. K., Romine, M. F., Beliaev, A. S., Auchtung, J. M., Driscoll, M. E., Gardner, T. S., et al. (2008). Towards environmental systems biology of Shewanella. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 592–603.

Google Scholar

Glaeser, S. P., and Kämpfer, P. (2015). Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 38, 237–245. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gorby, Y. A., Yanina, S., McLean, J. S., Rosso, K. M., Moyles, D., Dohnalkova, A., et al. (2006). Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 11358–11363. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604517103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ha, M., Jo, H. J., Choi, E. K., Kim, Y., Kim, J., and Cho, H. J. (2019). Reliable identification of Bacillus cereus group species using low mass biomarkers by MALDI-TOF MS. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 887–896. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1903.03033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hau, H. H., and Gralnick, J. A. (2007). Ecology and biotechnology of the genus Shewanella. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61, 237–258.

Google Scholar

Honnavar, P., Ghosh, A. K., Paul, S., Shankarnarayan, S. A., Singh, P., Dogra, S., et al. (2018). Identification of Malassezia species by MALDI-TOF MS after expansion of database. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 92, 118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.05.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Janda, J. M., and Abbott, S. L. (2014). The genus Shewanella: from the briny depths below to human pathogen. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 40, 293–312. doi: 10.3109/1040841x.2012.726209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jang, K. S., and Kim, Y. H. (2018). Rapid and robust MALDI-TOF MS techniques for microbial identification: a brief overview of their diverse applications. J. Microbiol. 56, 209–216. doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-7457-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kouzuma, A., Kasai, T., Hirose, A., and Watanabe, K. (2015). Catabolic and regulatory systems in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 involved in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Front. Microbiol. 6:609. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, P. Y., Lin, C. F., Tung, K. C., Shyu, C. L., Wu, M. J., Liu, J. W., et al. (2013). Clinical and microbiological features of Shewanella bacteremia in patients with hepatobiliary disease. Intern. Med. 52, 431–438. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.8152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McLaughlin, J., Nelson, M., McNevin, D., Roffey, P., and Gahan, M. E. (2014). Characterization of Bacillus strains and hoax agents by protein profiling using automated microfluidic capillary electrophoresis. Forensic. Sci. Med. Pathol. 10, 380–389. doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9578-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McLean, J. S., Majors, P. D., Reardon, C. L., Bilskis, C. L., Reed, S. B., Romine, M. F., et al. (2008). Investigations of structure and metabolism within Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. J. Microbiol. Methods. 74, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miyazaki, M., Nogi, Y., Usami, R., and Horikoshi, K. (2006). Shewanella surugensis sp. nov., Shewanella kaireitica sp. nov. and Shewanella abyssi sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sediments of Suruga Bay, Japan. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 1607–1613. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64173-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakamura, S., Sato, H., Tanaka, R., and Yaguchi, T. (2016). Verification of ribosomal proteins of Aspergillus fumigatus for use as biomarkers in MALDI-TOF MS identification. Mass. Spectrom. 5:A0049.

Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. A., Lynch-Healy, M., Corcoran, D., O’Reilly, B., O’Mahony, J., and Lucey, B. (2016). improved matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based identification of Mycobacterium spp. by use of a novel two-step cell disruption preparatory technique. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 495–496. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02998-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pagani, L., Lang, A., Vedovelli, C., Moling, O., Rimenti, G., Pristerà, R., et al. (2003). Soft tissue infection and bacteremia caused by Shewanella putrefaciens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 2240–2241. doi: 10.1128/jcm.41.5.2240-2241.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paul, S., Singh, P., Sharma, S., Prasad, G. S., Rudramurthy, S. M., Chakrabarti, A., et al. (2019). MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of Melanized Fungi is faster and reliable after the expansion of in-house database. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 13:e1800070.

Google Scholar

Poonawala, H., Marrs Conner, T., and Peaper, D. R. (2018). Closing the brief case: misidentification of brucella melitensis as Ochrobactrum anthropi by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). J. Clin. Microbiol. 56:e00918-17.

Google Scholar

Regoui, S., Hennebique, A., Girard, T., Boisset, S., Caspar, Y., and Maurin, M. (2020). Optimized MALDI TOF mass spectrometry identification of Francisella tularensis Subsp. holarctica. Microorganisms 8:1143. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Temporal, D., Perez-Risco, D., Struzka, E. A., Mas, M., and Alcaide, F. (2017). Impact of updating the MALDI-TOF MS database on the identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria. J. Mass Spectrom. 52, 597–602. doi: 10.1002/jms.3944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryzhov, V., and Fenselau, C. (2001). Characterization of the protein subset desorbed by MALDI from whole bacterial cells. Anal. Chem. 73, 746–750. doi: 10.1021/ac0008791

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samantha, S., Daniel, K., Robin, P., and Audrey, N. S. (2018). Routine use of MALDI-TOF MS for anaerobic bacterial identification in clinical microbiology. Anaerobe 54, 191–196. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez-Juanes, F., Teixeira-Martín, V., González-Buitrago, J. M., Velázquez, E., and Flores-Félix, J. D. (2020). Identification of species and subspecies of lactic acid bacteria present in spanish cheeses type “Torta” by MALDI-TOF MS and pheS gene Analyses. Microorganisms 8:301. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schubert, S., and Kostrzewa, M. (2017). MALDI-TOF MS in the microbiology laboratory: current trends. Curr. Issues. Mol. Biol. 23, 17–20. doi: 10.21775/cimb.023.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, D. L., Jiang, X., Wu, Q. L., and Zhou, N. Y. (2013). Intragenomic heterogeneity of 16S rRNA genes causes overestimation of prokaryotic diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5962–5969. doi: 10.1128/aem.01282-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sung, H. R., Yoon, J. H., and Ghim, S. Y. (2012). Shewanella dokdonensis sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 1636–1643. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.032995-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Belkum, A., Chatellier, S., Girard, V., Pincus, D., Deol, P., and Dunne, W. M. Jr., et al. (2015). Progress in proteomics for clinical microbiology: MALDI-TOF MS for microbial species identification and more. Expert. Rev. Proteomics 12, 595–605. doi: 10.1586/14789450.2015.1091731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, F., Xiao, X., Ou, H. Y., Gai, Y., and Wang, F. (2009). Role and regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis in the response of Shewanella piezotolerans WP3 to different temperatures and pressures. J. Bacteriol. 191, 2574–2584. doi: 10.1128/jb.00498-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wieser, A., Schneider, L., Jung, J., and Schubert, S. (2012). MALDI-TOF MS in microbiological diagnostics-identification of microorganisms and beyond (mini review). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93, 965–974. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3783-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yarza, P., Yilmaz, P., Pruesse, E., Glöckner, F. O., Ludwig, W., Schleifer, K. H., et al. (2014). Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 635–645. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yousfi, K., Bekal, S., Usongo, V., and Touati, A. (2017). Current trends of human infections and antibiotic resistance of the genus Shewanella. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36, 1353–1362. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-2962-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Fang, Y., Pang, F., Liang, S., Lu, X., Kan, B., et al. (2018). Rare Shewanella spp. associated with pulmonary and bloodstream infections of cancer patients, China: a case report. BMC Infect. Dis. 18:454. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3354-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, L., Huang, Y. H., Long, Z. E., and Qiao, Y. (2018). On-going applications of Shewanella species in microbial electrochemical system for bioenergy, bioremediation and biosensing. World. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35:9.

Google Scholar

Keywords: MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, detection, Shewanella, multilocus sequence analysis, establishment and application

Citation: Yu K, Huang Z, Li Y, Fu Q, Lin L, Wu S, Dai H, Cai H, Xiao Y, Lan R and Wang D (2021) Establishment and Application of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Detection of Shewanella Genus. Front. Microbiol. 12:625821. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.625821

Received: 13 November 2020; Accepted: 04 January 2021;
Published: 18 February 2021.

Edited by:

Eugenia Bezirtzoglou, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

Reviewed by:

Karola Böhme, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Victoria Girard, bioMérieux, France
Jaroslav Hrabak, Charles University, Czechia

Copyright © 2021 Yu, Huang, Li, Fu, Lin, Wu, Dai, Cai, Xiao, Lan and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Duochun Wang, wangduochun@icdc.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.