Michael Bonkowski1*
Mika Tarkka2,3
Bahar S. Razavi4
Hannes Schmidt5
Evgenia Blagodatskaya2
Robert Koller6
Peng Yu7
Claudia Knief8Frank Hochholdinger9
Doris Vetterlein10,11- 1Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- 2Department of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle, Germany
- 3German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- 4Department of Soil and Plant Microbiome, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- 5Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 6Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
- 7Emmy Noether Group Root Functional Biology, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- 8Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation – Molecular Biology of the Rhizosphere, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- 9Crop Functional Genomics, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- 10Department of Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle, Germany
- 11Soil Science, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Numerous studies have shown that plants selectively recruit microbes from the soil to establish a complex, yet stable and quite predictable microbial community on their roots – their “microbiome.” Microbiome assembly is considered as a key process in the self-organization of root systems. A fundamental question for understanding plant-microbe relationships is where a predictable microbiome is formed along the root axis and through which microbial dynamics the stable formation of a microbiome is challenged. Using maize as a model species for which numerous data on dynamic root traits are available, this mini-review aims to give an integrative overview on the dynamic nature of root growth and its consequences for microbiome assembly based on theoretical considerations from microbial community ecology.
Introduction
Numerous studies have shown that plants selectively recruit microbes from the soil to establish a complex, yet stable and quite predictable microbial community on their roots – their “microbiome” (Berg and Smalla, 2009; Hartmann et al., 2009; Weinert et al., 2010). Microbiome assembly is considered as a key process in the self-organization of root systems (Vetterlein et al., 2020). Better control of microbiome assembly would improve plant health and fitness by promoting beneficial microbial traits (Friesen et al., 2011; Oyserman et al., 2018; Wille et al., 2019). A fundamental question for understanding plant-microbe relationships is where a predictable microbiome is formed along the root axis and through which microbial dynamics the stable formation of a microbiome is challenged. Theoretically, community assembly begins with random, unregulated colonization of taxa from nearby sites (i.e., neutral processes), a process that continues throughout the lifetime of roots; while ordered dynamics (microbiome assembly) occur through selection (i.e., niche-based processes) when (i) exudates promote fast-growing copiotrophic taxa, (ii) root signals attract specific symbionts or pathogens, (iii) increased competition due to limited resource availability leads to species sorting, and (iv) predation selects for specific microbial traits among members of the microbiome (Vellend, 2010; Hardoim et al., 2011; Ho et al., 2017; Kudjordjie et al., 2019; Amacker et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020). These microbial assembly processes again are embedded in plant-driven spatiotemporal dynamics at small and large scales, caused by differences in the quality and quantity of rhizodeposition: (i) along the root axis, (ii) during diurnal cycles, (iii) on different root types, and (iv) during plant development. Emphasizing maize as a model species for which numerous data on dynamic root traits are available, this mini-review aims to give an integrative overview on the dynamic nature of root growth and its consequences for microbiome assembly based on theoretical considerations from microbial community ecology.
The Root System of Maize: a Cereal Model for Dissecting Plant-Microbial Interactions
Maize displays a high degree of genomic diversity (Hake and Ross-Ibarra, 2015) and its specific root system facilitates the extraction of water and mineral nutrients from the soil (Yu et al., 2016b). The maize root system bears different root types and responds sensitively to the availability of nutrients (Yu et al., 2015, 2016a). It is composed of embryonic roots including primary and seminal roots and postembryonic root types such as crown roots, and these different root types influence the form and function of the root system at different developmental stages throughout the whole life cycle of maize plants (Hochholdinger et al., 2018). The different maize root types show specific anatomical properties, distinct gene expression patterns (Tai et al., 2016), and root type specific metabolic signatures that affect both bacterial and fungal communities inhabiting respective root types (Yu et al., 2018; Cotton et al., 2019). For example, benzoxazinoids have an influence on both the rhizosphere microbiome and root herbivory (Kudjordjie et al., 2019) and are particularly enriched in lateral and crown root exudates (Park et al., 2004). Furthermore, plant genotypes in maize, due to domestication and breeding, influence community assembly of microbiota (Bouffaud et al., 2012, 2014; Peiffer et al., 2013; Szoboszlay et al., 2015). The relative strength of plant genotype effect is at its strongest within root tissues, while soil origin has often a more significant impact on rhizosphere communities (Edwards et al., 2015; Bonito et al., 2019; Veach et al., 2019; Brown et al., 2020). Although the optimization of microbial formulas using synthetic communities is advancing, crop breeding programs have not yet incorporated the selection of beneficial traits of rhizosphere microorganisms (Trivedi et al., 2020). The perhaps most promising trait in this respect is pathogen resistance (Zhao et al., 2004; Qiu et al., 2020), where the rhizosphere community has proved helpful (Compant et al., 2005; Hohmann and Messmer, 2017). For instance, a common bean cultivar resistant to Fusarium oxysporum selects for a particular rhizosphere microbiome with enriched functional traits related to the first line of defense against the pathogen, biosynthesis machineries for antifungal phenazines, and fungal membrane damaging small molecules, rhamnolipids (Mendes et al., 2018). We refer to Schmidt et al. (2016) for a more thorough discussion of the effects of maize domestication on changes in root traits and possible consequences for microbiome function that may guide future studies. Taken together, maize appears as an ideal model crop species to dissect the relationships between root structure, plant genetic diversity, and breeding history, and their interaction with soil microbes under diverse environmental conditions (Yu and Hochholdinger, 2018).
Rhizosphere Community Assembly Along the Growing Root Axis
The microbiome concept implies guidance of microbial assembly processes by plant roots, but the spatio-temporal dynamics of root growth requires the concurrent reassembly of microbial communities along the root axis (Kuzyakov and Razavi, 2019).
Microbiome assembly starts when microorganisms first encounter the cap of a maize root, which is actively generated in the very tips of the roots (Hochholdinger, 2009). It consists of border cells that separate from the root and are embedded in a water-soluble polysaccharide mucilage matrix (Hawes et al., 2016). The translocation of recently fixed photosynthates to root tips takes less than 1 h (Henkes et al., 2008; Fischer et al., 2010), but the great majority of soil microorganisms in bulk soil resides in a dormant state (Blagodatskaya and Kuzyakov, 2013). It takes about half a day until bacteria and other fast growing microorganisms have entered an exponential growth phase while root growth continues (Watt et al., 2006b; Bonkowski and Clarholm, 2012). Average root growth in maize was shown to proceed at a rate of 2 cm d−1 for primary roots, 0.75 cm d−1 for first and second order lateral roots, and 3 cm d−1 for the seminal roots and the shoot born crown roots (de Moraes et al., 2019). Because only a part of bulk soil microorganisms (e.g., the fast-growing, “copiotrophic” microorganisms) possess the physiological prerequisites to exploit the transient resource pulses from rhizodeposits (Ho et al., 2017), the rhizosphere microbiota are generally characterized by a lower alpha diversity and evenness compared to bulk soil communities (Gomes et al., 2001; Haichar et al., 2008; Aira et al., 2010; Peiffer et al., 2013; Ofek et al., 2014; Walters et al., 2018).
Microbiome Assembly From a Microbial Perspective
For the colonization of root tips, community assembly theory assumes highest randomness through priority effects, because species that arrive first (both by active migration and by shifting from dormancy into activity) have a competitive advantage over later arriving species by exploiting (niche preemption) and/or modifying (niche modification) the available resources (Fukami, 2015; Nuccio et al., 2020). Dominance of different taxa on different root tips then should lead to highest variation of microbial beta diversity (Anderson et al., 2006; Rüger et al., 2021).
Most important in this respect, but still understudied, are priority effects of root-infecting symbionts, such as mycorrhizae. Plants allocate up to 30% of total photosynthate to mycorrhiza (Bending et al., 2006; Moyano et al., 2007; Brüggemann et al., 2011), and root mycorrhization again strongly feeds back on community assembly of other rhizobiota (Mar Vázquez et al., 2000; Henkes et al., 2018; Sarkar et al., 2019). For example, a recent SIP study by Hünninghaus et al. (2019) demonstrated the central role of mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) on maize roots (Figure 1) as a carbon shunt to its associated “mycorrhizosphere” microbiome (Nuccio et al., 2013). The trade-offs and multiple reciprocal interactions between root-infecting and free-living microbiota certainly deserve more attention (Andrade et al., 1998; Xavier and Germida, 2003; Frey-Klett and Garbaye, 2005; Koller et al., 2013a,b; Rudnick et al., 2015; Rodríguez-Caballero et al., 2017), but would exceed the scope of this minireview.
Figure 1. Incorporation of plant-derived carbon (13C) into RNA of rhizosphere and bulk soil microbiota 2 days after continuous 13CO2 labeling over 6 days of 32 day-old maize plants. Rhizosphere taxa are shown in green, bulk soil taxa in brown, and size of circles corresponds to read abundance of enriched taxa. Arrow width indicates the relative magnitude of C-flow based on 13C-enrichment factors of the organisms. The depicted C flow only represents the assimilated 13C and thus underestimates total C-flow by not taking into account the respired 13C at various trophic levels. Dotted arrows indicate potential C flow based on trophic relationships. The C-flow network implemented in Cytoscape based on data of Hünninghaus et al. (2019).
In addition, microevolutionary processes among free-living rhizobiota can affect the composition and function of the rhizosphere microbiome (Prosser et al., 2007). Zee and Fukami (2018) showed that priority effects of competing bacterial populations weakened within weeks due to fast sympatric co-evolution, leading to increased niche differentiation and phenotypic complementarity among taxa. It has been assumed that community assembly of free-living rhizobiota should be subject to substantial variability, as plant hosts cannot selectively sanction or punish non-rewarding free-living microorganisms (Denison et al., 2003). In particular, the common plant growth promoting traits of rhizosphere bacteria are based on the production of “public goods” (e.g., exoenzymes for nutrient mineralization, siderophores for nutrient capture, etc.) that are costly to produce for the individual and prone to exploitation by non-cooperating cheaters in microbial communities (Denison et al., 2003; Keller and Surette, 2006; West et al., 2006; Jousset et al., 2009). Bacteria respond to metabolic burdens by fast adaptive changes, known as “phase variation” where costly traits in different parts of a bacterial population can be activated/eliminated in an on/off fashion (Henderson et al., 1999; van den Broek et al., 2003; Vial et al., 2010). For example, it is believed that the frequent failure of “plant growth promoting bacteria” is due to the loss of plant protecting traits, like antifungal secondary metabolites, induced by these trade-offs (Chancey et al., 2002; van den Broek et al., 2003, 2005). Accordingly, bacterial traits may undergo rapid co-evolutionary changes during the lifetime of a growing plant root (Oger et al., 2004; Donn et al., 2015). Still, priority effects and the coverage of functional traits by beneficial rhizosphere bacteria are essential for the invasion resistance of the root microbiome to pathogens (Wei et al., 2015; Xiong et al., 2017).
Plant Selection for Microbial Traits
Experimental evidence indicates that root tips are already actively involved in the selection of specific microorganisms. It has been shown that the polysaccharide composition of root mucilage selects for microorganisms with suitable glycosyl hydrolase composition (Amicucci et al., 2019), and further selection is evoked by extracellular DNA, antimicrobial proteins, and secondary metabolites (Hawes et al., 2012; Haichar et al., 2014). Some bacterial taxa, like Opitutaceae and members in Burkholderiales, might be especially adapted to the rapid assimilation of specific rhizodeposits in maize and other cereals (Hünninghaus et al., 2019; Nuccio et al., 2020). A mathematical model of bacterial growth dynamics after encountering a growing root tip by Dupuy and Silk (2016) identified early attachment to root tips as a decisive bacterial trait, because attached bacteria remaining on the maturing root gain access to larger quantities of exudate-C and can multiply at faster rates. Since bacterial colonization is limited by a finite number of attachment sites, Dupuy and Silk (2016) assumed that detachment and re-colonization of less populated root tip regions can substantially increase the microbial carrying capacity of roots, leading to a sharp bacterial peak density on tips. Microscopical studies of roots instead show a rather low and patchy colonization of root tips, and only as roots mature an increase in bacterial cell densities with more homogeneous distributions is observed (Schmidt and Eickhorst, 2014; Schmidt et al., 2018). On the other hand, typical rhizosphere microorganisms are often mobile, and bacteria, protists, and some rapidly growing fungi (e.g., “sugar fungi,” de Boer et al., 2006) move in parallel to the exudate pulse along the root (Hünninghaus et al., 2019). These organisms are generally characterized by high “rhizosphere competence,” being both, well adapted to fast colonization and fierce competitors for root colonization sites (Lugtenberg et al., 2001; Kamilova et al., 2005; Schreiter et al., 2014, 2018; Mulero-Aparicio et al., 2019).
The recruitment of microbes from the soil by plants is further influenced by the endogenous development of individual roots. The unequal distribution of microorganisms (Hebbar et al., 1992; Watt et al., 2006a; Buddrus-Schiemann et al., 2010) and their functional potential (Baudoin et al., 2002) between the actively growing root tip, root elongation, and maturation zones is associated with a spatial gene expression gradient along the root. This comprises a gradual transition from transcripts related to sugar-mediated signaling at the root meristematic zone to defense response related pathways toward the maturation zone (Hill et al., 2016; Stelpflug et al., 2016). Studies applying stable isotope probing (SIP) of plants and root-associated microorganisms indicate strong dynamics in the taxonomic composition and activity of microbial consumers in the rhizosphere (Drigo et al., 2010; Nuccio et al., 2020). For example, Hünninghaus et al. (2019) demonstrated that bacterial taxa with highest read abundance in the rhizosphere of maize were not necessarily those showing highest enrichment of 13C from rhizodeposition (Figure 1), indicating substantial differences in consumption of exudates. Similarly, Nuccio et al. (2020) reported a fast functional succession in carbohydrate depolymerization (CAZyme) genes in the rhizosphere of the grass Avena fatua, but functions of individual taxa were not mutually exclusive and only a handful of the bacterial taxa with CAZyme potential were actively involved metabolizing root carbon at any timepoint. Accordingly, active and passive exudation of low molecular weight carbon compounds, mostly sugars and organic acids, in the subsequent root expansion and root hair zones (Farrar et al., 2003) constitutes the next level of microbial community modulation (Hu et al., 2018). The root hair region was further shown to be a main regulator of rhizosphere enzyme activities (Giles et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020). Because root exudates contain a variety of plant species-specific metabolites and signal compounds with critical functional roles in plant defense and symbiosis (Baetz and Martinoia, 2014), they have been suggested to be the main drivers for the selection of root-specific microorganisms (Badri and Vivanco, 2009; Hartmann et al., 2009; van Dam and Bouwmeester, 2016; Hugoni et al., 2018; Nuccio et al., 2020).
Circadian Rhythm and Microbiome Assembly
From a microbial perspective, however, deterministic community assembly processes are rather unlikely as long as resources are not limiting (Nemergut et al., 2013; Rüger et al., 2021). In maize, the abundant rhizodeposits of the root hair region even stimulate the production of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances and the formation of rhizosheaths as a mechanism to enhance root-soil contact (Watt et al., 1993, 1994). However, sugar metabolism in plants is subject to strong circadian regulation with the storage of photosynthates as starch during the day and its remobilization for growth and metabolism during the night, resulting in the depletion of carbohydrate reserves just before dawn (Bläsing et al., 2005; Stitt and Zeeman, 2012). These dynamics are reflected by pulsed exudation rates with strong diurnal fluctuations in the rhizosphere (Kuzyakov and Cheng, 2004). For example, in maize, exudation was found to be 1.5-fold reduced during night compared to daytime (Kuzyakov et al., 2003; Oburger et al., 2014). These transitory resource constraints in the rhizosphere have the potential to exert selection pressures on the functional traits and taxonomic composition of rhizosphere communities (Baraniya et al., 2018). The diurnal timing of rhizodeposition appears to be of major importance for understanding the assembly of microbiomes. Models and experiments by Semenov et al. (1999) and van Bruggen et al. (2008) indicate that the transient pulses of root exudates lead to a fast successions of competing microorganisms that may appear as moving waves along the root axis. Their models account for selection pressures that lead to oscillating dynamics between competing copiotrophic and oligotrophic bacterial taxa during root maturation, which are further enhanced by predator-prey dynamics of bacterivores (Zelenev et al., 2005, 2006).
Predator-Prey Dynamics and Microbiome Assembly
There is increasing evidence that predator-prey dynamics of bacterivores contribute significantly to the deterministic processes that eventually determine microbiome composition and function (Rosenberg et al., 2009; Amacker et al., 2020; Rüger et al., 2021). Numbers of bacterivore protists show a steep increase toward the plant rhizosphere, where protist predation regulates bacterial turnover (Zwart et al., 1994; Alphei et al., 1996). Protist predation is known to rapidly alter bacterial community structure and function by changing bacterial competition and growth-defense trade-offs, e.g., due to upregulation of antibiotics production, and it further initiates microevolution of bacterial traits during the lifetime of a plant host (Young, 2006; Mazzola et al., 2009; Jousset and Bonkowski, 2010; Jousset, 2012; Friman et al., 2014; Song et al., 2015). The fact that the mere supernatants of protist cultures were sufficient to change the expression of bacterial defense-traits in culture (Jousset et al., 2010) demonstrates that studies focusing solely on bacteria-plant interactions fall short of what is required to understand the self-assembly of rhizosphere communities and microbiome functions. Few experiments to date studied how increased species richness of protistan predators feeds back on bacterial diversity and function. Single protist taxa differ in their feeding modes (Glücksman et al., 2010; Flues et al., 2017; Amacker et al., 2020), and higher species richness was shown to strongly increase the exploitation of bacterial prey species (Saleem et al., 2012, 2013; Hünninghaus et al., 2017). It appears that protistan predation is enhancing bacterial biocontrol activity on roots (Weidner et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2019; Amacker et al., 2020). Resulting changes in bacterial community composition apparently feedback again on the composition of communities of bacterivore rhizosphere protists (Sapp et al., 2017; Rossmann et al., 2020). Accordingly, we hypothesize that the self-organization of bacterial rhizosphere communities is shaped by both bottom-up processes via resource supply from rhizodeposits and top-down processes through grazing activities by protists, or even predatory bacteria and bacteriophage viruses (Geisen et al., 2017; Vetterlein et al., 2020). In other words, we believe that the net impact between predators and prey is driven by reciprocal selection through a coevolutionary arms race toward grazing-resistant bacteria and rapid adaptation of protistan grazers. Focusing only on bottom-up processes will miss a crucial feedback mechanism on bacterial functioning.
Influence of Plant Growth Stage on Microbiome Assembly
On longer time scales, microbiome composition changes as plants mature. Root growth dynamics and vitality of roots change dynamically during the lifetime of a maize plant (Fusseder, 1987; Pagès and Pellerin, 1994; Pellerin and Pagès, 1994). Simultaneously, the contributions of different root types to root architecture are changing (Wang et al., 1994; Hochholdinger, 2009; Yu et al., 2018). The resulting associated alterations in the quantity and composition of root exudates during plant development directly feed back on microbiome composition (Aulakh et al., 2001; Chaparro et al., 2013). The consequences of these phenological changes on species turnover of microbiomes and changes in regulatory microbiome functions are as yet little understood. Field studies indicate that the compostition of bacterial and fungal communities is more significantly influenced by plant growth stages than by fertilization level, and that the most temporally separated stages show the most significant differences in both bacterial and fungal communities (Wang et al., 2016, 2018). For instance, Ascomycota are enriched during fast seedling growth rate, but Basidiomycota and Glomeromycota are more abundant later, during flowering. These changes have functional relevance, since community-level physiological profiling demonstrated that the rhizosphere communities of different plant species were more similar at the same than at different developmental stages (Houlden et al., 2008). Plant rhizodeposits are differentially produced at distinct stages of development, and Chaparro et al. (2014) related such changes to differential distribution of bacterial phyla and representation of their traits in an experimental culture system. Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Cyanobacteria followed distinct patterns associated with plant development and root exudation, and metatranscriptomics analysis of the rhizosphere microbiome revealed changes in, for instance, genes involved in antibiosis. From root exudates, phenolic compounds appeared to mediate changes in both the relative 16S rRNA and the transcript abundances (Chaparro et al., 2014). In the field, factors that co-vary with plant growth stages include in particular soil temperature, and soil moisture, as well as crop growth rate. It appears that plants reduce root exudation and investments into microbiome functioning when plant physiology changes from vegetative to reproductive growth (Aulakh et al., 2001; De-la-Peña et al., 2010). This is generally accompanied by a reduction of species richness and changing abundances of rhizosphere microbiota (Toljander et al., 2008; Chaparro et al., 2014; Schmidt and Eickhorst, 2014). In this respect, the modern “stay-green” hybrids of maize, characterized by a delayed canopy senescence, deserve particular attention (Ding et al., 2005; Lee and Tollenaar, 2007), because their longer photosynthetic activity and higher N-demand together with increased total root length and deeper roots compared to older varieties (Echarte et al., 2008; Ning et al., 2014; Antonietta et al., 2016) likely feeds back on microbiome persistence and functioning. Taken together, shifts in the spatio-temporal patterns of microbial abundance and community composition at different developmental stages could impact microbiome functions at larger scales, such as decomposition and nutrient mobilization processes. However, the effects of phenological changes on the composition of the maize microbiome are currently too poorly understood to allow more exact predictions of its functional implications.
Outlook and Application
Currently, network analysis appears as the most promising tool to identify relevant patterns in the trophic structure and complex co-occurrences of taxa among multiple domains in the microbioime, i.e., bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists (Rüger et al., 2021); and network analysis allows to integrate further multi-omics data (e.g., root exudate profiles, proteomics, peptidomics, and gene expression) and their correlation to specific taxa (for current approaches, see reviews by Jiang et al., 2019; Trivedi et al., 2020). For practical applications, the aim must be to identify microbial consortia affecting specific plant traits (Vílchez et al., 2016; Oyserman et al., 2018), then strong and weak phenotypic responders among plant varieties could be identified by bulk segregant analysis, and resulting inbred lines after crossing a strong and weak responder cultivar can be used to identify plant molecular control points through quantitative trait loci (Quarrie et al., 1999; Phillips and Strong, 2003). Current plant microbiome studies are often still rather descriptive, but the tools are available to approach hypotheses-driven, targeted manipulations of plant microbiomes to improve plant breeding for a more sustainable agriculture (Wei and Jousset, 2017; Jacoby et al., 2021).
Summary
The microbial community assembly in the rhizosphere is as dynamic as root growth with distinct diurnal and phenological changes during the lifetime of the plant. The assembly of the rhizosphere microbiome along the root axis is initiated at the root cap with a significant community shift from metabolically inactive to fast-growing, copiotrophic taxa. Apparently even at this early stage of root growth, both plant secondary metabolites and bacterial traits of “rhizosphere competence” contribute to the preference of particular taxa in the microbiome. Still, a crucial prerequisite for the operation of deterministic assembly processes is the constraint of resources. Therefore, the abundant resource supply from rhizodeposition likely counteracts microbiome selection and favors stochastic (i.e., “neutral”) processes of community assembly, especially through priority effects at initial stages of root colonization. Accordingly, the exploitation of priority effects appears most promising for the targeted optimization of microbial consortia for microbiome engineering. At some point, the initially random, neutral assembly of free-living microbiota will be replaced by increasingly deterministic assembly processes; reflected by low variability of beta diversity between communities. Deterministic processes of community assembly become more likely when the resources from rhizodeposits subside and roots mature. A subsequently increased competition for resources in concert with top-down control by predators, may eventually lead to the formation of a stable rhizosphere “microbiome.” Still, there are a number of unresolved issues. Diurnal fluctuations in magnitude and composition of rhizodeposits may play a more important role for microbiome assembly than currently appreciated. Different root types of maize bear different microbial communities and it would be interesting to know whether the enhanced variability of microbial taxa also covers broader functional versatility. In particular, uncovering the spatial and temporal coordination of microbiome composition and function during the development of plants remains a challenging task in future studies.
Author Contributions
MB drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed significantly to improve the manuscript by intensive discussions and substantial additions and revisions of text passages.
Funding
This study received funding by the DFG (German Research Foundation) Priority Program SPP 2089 Rhizosphere Spatiotemporal Organization-A Key to Rhizosphere Functions, with contributions of subprojects 403635931, 403671039, 403670038, 403664478, 403641192, 403637614, 403801423, and DFG Emmy Noether grant 444755415 to PY.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
RK acknowledges support from the Helmholtz Association for the Forschungszentrum Jülich. We thank Sebastian Flues for creating the figure. We also thank two unknown referees for their valuable and constructive comments.
References
Aira, M., Gómez-Brandón, M., Lazcano, C., Bååth, E., and Domínguez, J. (2010). Plant genotype strongly modifies the structure and growth of maize rhizosphere microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 2276–2281. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.029
Alphei, J., Bonkowski, M., and Scheu, S. (1996). Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europaeus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth. Oecologia 106, 111–126.
Amacker, N., Gao, Z., Agaras, B. C., Latz, E., Kowalchuk, G. A., Valverde, C. F., et al. (2020). Biocontrol traits correlate with resistance to predation by Protists in soil pseudomonads. Front. Microbiol. 11:614194. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.614194
Amicucci, M. J., Galermo, A. G., Guerrero, A., Treves, G., Nandita, E., Kailemia, M. J., et al. (2019). Strategy for structural elucidation of polysaccharides: elucidation of a maize mucilage that harbors diazotrophic bacteria. Anal. Chem. 91, 7254–7265. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00789
Anderson, M. J., Ellingsen, K. E., and McArdle, B. H. (2006). Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol. Lett. 9, 683–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00926.x
Andrade, G., Linderman, R. G., and Bethlenfalvay, G. J. (1998). Bacterial associations with the mycorrhizosphere and hyphosphere of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Plant Soil 202, 79–87. doi: 10.1023/A:1004397222241
Antonietta, M., Acciaresi, H. A., and Guiamet, J. J. (2016). Responses to N deficiency in stay green and non-stay green Argentinean hybrids of maize. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 202, 231–242. doi: 10.1111/jac.12136
Aulakh, M. S., Wassmann, R., Bueno, C., Kreuzwieser, J., and Rennenberg, H. (2001). Characterization of root exudates at different growth stages of ten rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Plant Biol. 3, 139–148. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12905
Badri, D. V., and Vivanco, J. M. (2009). Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 666–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01926.x
Baetz, U., and Martinoia, E. (2014). Root exudates: the hidden part of plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.11.006
Baraniya, D., Nannipieri, P., Kublik, S., Vestergaard, G., Schloter, M., and Schöler, A. (2018). The impact of the diurnal cycle on the microbial transcriptome in the rhizosphere of barley. Microb. Ecol. 75, 830–833. doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-1101-0
Baudoin, E., Benizri, E., and Guckert, A. (2002). Impact of growth stage on the bacterial community structure along maize roots, as determined by metabolic and genetic fingerprinting. Appl. Soil Ecol. 19, 135–145. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00185-8
Bending, G. D., Aspray, T. J., and Whipps, J. M. (2006). Significance of microbial interactions in the mycorrhizosphere. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 60, 97–132. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(06)60004-X
Berg, G., and Smalla, K. (2009). Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68, 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x
Blagodatskaya, E., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2013). Active microorganisms in soil: critical review of estimation criteria and approaches. Soil Biol. Biochem. 67, 192–211. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.024
Bläsing, O. E., Gibon, Y., Günther, M., Höhne, M., Morcuende, R., Osuna, D., et al. (2005). Sugars and circadian regulation make major contributions to the global regulation of diurnal gene expression in <em>Arabidopsis</em>. Plant Cell 17, 3257–3281. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035261
Bonito, G., Benucci, G. M. N., Hameed, K., Weighill, D., Jones, P., Chen, K. -H., et al. (2019). Fungal-bacterial networks in the populus rhizobiome are impacted by soil properties and host genotype. Front. Microbiol. 10:481. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00481
Bonkowski, M., and Clarholm, M. (2012). Stimulation of plant growth through interactions of bacteria and protozoa: testing the auxillary microbial loop hypothesis. Acta Protozool. 51, 237–247. doi: 10.4467/16890027AP.12.019.0765
Bouffaud, M. L., Kyselkova, M., Gouesnard, B., Grundmann, G., Muller, D., and Moenne-Loccoz, Y. (2012). Is diversification history of maize influencing selection of soil bacteria by roots? Mol. Ecol. 21, 195–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05359.x
Bouffaud, M. -L., Poirier, M. -A., Muller, D., and Moënne-Loccoz, Y. (2014). Root microbiome relates to plant host evolution in maize and other poaceae. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2804–2814. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12442
Brown, S. P., Grillo, M. A., Podowski, J. C., and Heath, K. D. (2020). Soil origin and plant genotype structure distinct microbiome compartments in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Microbiome 8:139. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00915-9
Brüggemann, N., Gessler, A., Kayler, Z., Keel, S. G., Badeck, F., Barthel, M., et al. (2011). Carbon allocation and carbon isotope fluxes in the plant-soil-atmosphere continuum: a review. Biogeosciences 8, 3457–3489. doi: 10.5194/bg-8-3457-2011
Buddrus-Schiemann, K., Schmid, M., Schreiner, K., Welzl, G., and Hartmann, A. (2010). Root colonization by Pseudomonas sp DSMZ 13134 and impact on the indigenous rhizosphere bacterial community of barley. Microb. Ecol. 60, 381–393. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9720-8
Chancey, S., Wood, D., Pierson, E., and Pierson, I. L. (2002). Survival of gacS/gacA mutants of the biological control bacterium Pseudomonas aureofaciens 30-84 in the wheat rhizosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3308–3314. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.7.3308-3314.2002
Chaparro, J. M., Badri, D. V., Bakker, M. G., Sugiyama, A., Manter, D. K., and Vivanco, J. M. (2013). Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions. PLoS One 8:e55731. doi: 10.1371/annotation/51142aed-2d94-4195-8a8a-9cb24b3c733b
Chaparro, J. M., Badri, D. V., and Vivanco, J. M. (2014). Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. ISME J. 8, 790–803. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.196
Chen, Y., Bonkowski, M., Shen, Y., Griffiths, B. S., Jiang, Y., Wang, X., et al. (2020). Root ethylene mediates rhizosphere microbial community reconstruction when chemically detecting cyanide produced by neighbouring plants. Microbiome 8:4. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0775-6
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clement, C., and Barka, E. A. (2005). Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4951–4959. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
Cotton, T. E. A., Pétriacq, P., Cameron, D. D., Meselmani, M. A., Schwarzenbacher, R., Rolfe, S. A., et al. (2019). Metabolic regulation of the maize rhizobiome by benzoxazinoids. ISME J. 13, 1647–1658. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0375-2
de Boer, W., Kowalchuk, G. A., and van Veen, J. A. (2006). 'Root-food' and the rhizosphere microbial community composition. New Phytol. 170, 3–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01674.x
de Moraes, M. T., Debiasi, H., Franchini, J. C., Bonetti, J. D. A., Levien, R., Schnepf, A., et al. (2019). Mechanical and hydric stress effects on maize root system development at different soil compaction levels. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1358. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01358
De-la-Peña, C., Badri, D. V., Lei, Z., Watson, B. S., Brandão, M. M., Silva-Filho, M. C., et al. (2010). Root secretion of defense-related proteins is development-dependent and correlated with flowering time. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 30654–30665. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.119040
Denison, R., Bledsoe, C., Kahn, M., O'Gara, F., Simms, E., and Thomashow, L. (2003). Cooperation in the rhizosphere and the "free-rider" problem. Ecology 84, 838–845. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0838:CITRAT]2.0.CO;2
Ding, L., Wang, K. J., Jiang, G. M., Liu, M. Z., Niu, S. L., and Gao, L. M. (2005). Post-anthesis changes in photosynthetic traits of maize hybrids released in different years. Field Crop Res. 93, 108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.09.008
Donn, S., Kirkegaard, J. A., Perera, G., Richardson, A. E., and Watt, M. (2015). Evolution of bacterial communities in the wheat crop rhizosphere. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 610–621. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12452
Drigo, B., Pijl, A. S., Duyts, H., Kielak, A., Gamper, H. A., Houtekamer, M. J., et al. (2010). Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 10938–10942. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912421107
Dupuy, L. X., and Silk, W. K. (2016). Mechanisms of early microbial establishment on growing root surfaces. Vadose Zone J. 15, 1–13. doi: 10.2136/vzj2015.06.0094
Echarte, L., Rothstein, S., and Tollenaar, M. (2008). The response of leaf photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation to nitrogen supply in an older and a newer maize hybrid. Crop Sci. 48, 656–665. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0366
Edwards, J., Johnson, C., Santos-Medellín, C., Lurie, E., Podishetty, N. K., Bhatnagar, S., et al. (2015). Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, E911–E920. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414592112
Farrar, J., Hawes, M., Jones, D., and Lindow, S. (2003). How roots control the flux of carbon to the rhizosphere. Ecology 84, 827–837. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0827:HRCTFO]2.0.CO;2
Fischer, H., Eckhardt, K.-U., Meyer, A., Neumann, G., Leinweber, P., Fischer, K., et al. (2010). Rhizodeposition of maize: short-term carbon budget and composition. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 173, 67–79. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200800293
Flues, S., Bass, D., and Bonkowski, M. (2017). Grazing of leaf-associated Cercomonads (Protists: Rhizaria: Cercozoa) structures bacterial community composition and function. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 3297–3309. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13824
Frey-Klett, P., and Garbaye, J. (2005). Mycorrhiza helper bacteria: a promising model for the genomic analysis of fungal-bacterial interactions. New Phytol. 168, 4–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01553.x
Friesen, M. L., Porter, S. S., Stark, S. C., von Wettberg, E. J., Sachs, J. L., and Martinez-Romero, E. (2011). Microbially mediated plant functional traits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 23–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145039
Friman, V. P., Jousset, A., and Buckling, A. (2014). Rapid prey evolution can alter the structure of predator-prey communities. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 374–380. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12303
Fukami, T. (2015). Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160340
Fusseder, A. (1987). The longevity and activity of the primary root of maize. Plant Soil 101, 257–265. doi: 10.1007/BF02370653
Gao, Z., Karlsson, I., Geisen, S., Kowalchuk, G., and Jousset, A. (2019). Protists: puppet masters of the Rhizosphere microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.011
Geisen, S., Mitchell, E. A. D., Wilkinson, D. M., Adl, S., Bonkowski, M., Brown, M. W., et al. (2017). Soil protistology rebooted: 30 fundamental questions to start with. Soil Biol. Biochem. 111, 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.001
Giles, C. D., Dupuy, L., Boitt, G., Brown, L. K., Condron, L. M., Darch, T., et al. (2018). Root development impacts on the distribution of phosphatase activity: improvements in quantification using soil zymography. Soil Biol. Biochem. 116, 158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.011
Glücksman, E., Bell, T., Griffiths, R. I., and Bass, D. (2010). Closely related protist strains have different grazing impacts on natural bacterial communities. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 3105–3113. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02283.x
Gomes, N., Heuer, H., Schönfeld, J., Costa, R., Mendonca-Hagler, L., and Smalla, K. (2001). Bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere of maize (Zea mays) grown in tropical soil studied by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Plant Soil 232, 167–180. doi: 10.1023/A:1010350406708
Haichar, F. E. Z., Marol, C., Berge, O., Rangel-Castro, J. I., Prosser, J. I., Balesdent, J., et al. (2008). Plant host habitat and root exudates shape soil bacterial community structure. ISME J. 2, 1221–1230. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.80
Haichar, F. E. Z., Santaella, C., Heulin, T., and Achouak, W. (2014). Root exudates mediated interactions belowground. Soil Biol. Biochem. 77, 69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.017
Hake, S., and Ross-Ibarra, J. (2015). Genetic, evolutionary and plant breeding insights from the domestication of maize. elife 4:e05861. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05861
Hardoim, P. R., Andreote, F. D., Reinhold-Hurek, B., and Sessitsch, A., van Overbeek, L. S., and van Elsas, J. D. (2011). Rice root-associated bacteria: insights into community structures across 10 cultivars. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 77, 154–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01092.x
Hartmann, A., Schmid, M., van Tuinen, D., and Berg, G. (2009). Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant Soil 321, 235–257. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9814-y
Hawes, M., Allen, C., Turgeon, B. G., Curlango-Rivera, G., Minh Tran, T., Huskey, D. A., et al. (2016). Root border cells and their role in plant Defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 143–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100140
Hawes, M. C., Curlango-Rivera, G., Xiong, Z., and Kessler, J. O. (2012). Roles of root border cells in plant defense and regulation of rhizosphere microbial populations by extracellular DNA ‘trapping’. Plant Soil 355, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1218-3
Hebbar, K. P., Davey, A. G., Merrin, J., and Dart, P. J. (1992). Rhizobacteria of maize antagonistic to Fusarium moniliforme, a soil-borne fungal pathogen: colonization of rhizosphere and roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 989–997. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(92)90027-U
Henderson, I. R., Owen, P., and Nataro, J. P. (1999). Molecular switches — the ON and OFF of bacterial phase variation. Mol. Microbiol. 33, 919–932. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01555.x
Henkes, G. J., Kandeler, E., Marhan, S., Scheu, S., and Bonkowski, M. (2018). Interactions of mycorrhiza and protists in the rhizosphere systemically alter microbial community composition, plant shoot-to-root ratio and within-root system nitrogen allocation. Front. Environ. Sci. 6:117. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00117
Henkes, G., Thorpe, M., Minchin, P., Schurr, U., and Röse, U. (2008). Jasmonic acid treatment to part of the root system is consistent with simulated leaf herbivory, diverting recently assimilated carbon towards untreated roots within an hour. Plant Cell Environ. 31, 1229–1236. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01828.x
Hill, C. B., Cassin, A., Keeble-Gagnère, G., Doblin, M. S., Bacic, A., and Roessner, U. (2016). De novo transcriptome assembly and analysis of differentially expressed genes of two barley genotypes reveal root-zone-specific responses to salt exposure. Sci. Rep. 6:31558. doi: 10.1038/srep31558
Ho, A., Di Lonardo, D. P., and Bodelier, P. L. (2017). Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93:fix0006. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix0006
Hochholdinger, F. (2009). “The maize root system: morphology, anatomy, and genetics” in Handbook of maize: Its biology. eds. J. L. Bennetzen and S. C. Hake (New York: Springer).
Hochholdinger, F., Yu, P., and Marcon, C. (2018). Genetic control of root system development in maize. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.10.004
Hohmann, P., and Messmer, M. M. (2017). Breeding for mycorrhizal symbiosis: focus on disease resistance. Euphytica 213, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10681-017-1900-x
Houlden, A., Timms-Wilson, T. M., Day, M. J., and Bailey, M. J. (2008). Influence of plant developmental stage on microbial community structure and activity in the rhizosphere of three field crops. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 65, 193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00535.x
Hu, L., Robert, C. A. M., Cadot, S., Zhang, X., Ye, M., Li, B., et al. (2018). Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat. Commun. 9:2738. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05122-7
Hugoni, M., Luis, P., Guyonnet, J., and Haichar, F. E. Z. (2018). Plant host habitat and root exudates shape fungal diversity. Mycorrhiza 28, 451–463. doi: 10.1007/s00572-018-0857-5
Hünninghaus, M., Dibbern, D., Kramer, S., Koller, R., Pausch, J., Schloter-Hai, B., et al. (2019). Disentangling carbon flow across microbial kingdoms in the rhizosphere of maize. Soil Biol. Biochem. 134, 122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.007
Hünninghaus, M., Koller, R., Kramer, S., Marhan, S., Kandeler, E., and Bonkowski, M. (2017). Changes in bacterial community composition and soil respiration indicate rapid successions of protist grazers during mineralization of maize crop residues. Pedobiologia 62, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2017.03.002
Jacoby, R. P., Koprivova, A., and Kopriva, S. (2021). Pinpointing secondary metabolites that shape the composition and function of the plant microbiome. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 57–69. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa424
Jiang, D., Armour, C. R., Hu, C., Mei, M., Tian, C., Sharpton, T. J., et al. (2019). Microbiome multi-Omics network analysis: statistical considerations, limitations, and opportunities. Front. Genet. 10:995. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00995
Jousset, A. (2012). Ecological and evolutive implications of bacterial defences against predators. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 1830–1843. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02627.x
Jousset, A., and Bonkowski, M. (2010). The model predator Acanthamoeba castellanii induces the production of 2,4, DAPG by the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens Q2-87. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 1647–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.018
Jousset, A., Rochat, L., Pechy-Tarr, M., Keel, C., Scheu, S., and Bonkowski, M. (2009). Predators promote defence of rhizosphere bacterial populations by selective feeding on non-toxic cheaters. ISME J. 3, 666–674. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.26
Jousset, A., Rochat, L., Scheu, S., Bonkowski, M., and Keel, C. (2010). Predator-prey chemical warfare determines the expression of biocontrol genes by rhizosphere-associated Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 5263–5268. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02941-09
Kamilova, F., Validov, S., Azarova, T., Mulders, I., and Lugtenberg, B. (2005). Enrichment for enhanced competitive plant root tip colonizers selects for a new class of biocontrol bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1809–1817. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00889.x
Keller, L., and Surette, M. G. (2006). Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 249–258. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1383
Koller, R., Rodriguez, A., Robin, C., Scheu, S., and Bonkowski, M. (2013a). Protozoa enhance foraging efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for mineral nitrogen from organic matter in soil to the benefit of host plants. New Phytol. 199, 203–211. doi: 10.1111/nph.12249
Koller, R., Scheu, S., Bonkowski, M., and Robin, C. (2013b). Protozoa stimulate N uptake and growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 65, 204–210. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.020
Kudjordjie, E. N., Sapkota, R., Steffensen, S. K., Fomsgaard, I. S., and Nicolaisen, M. (2019). Maize synthesized benzoxazinoids affect the host associated microbiome. Microbiome 7:59. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0677-7
Kuzyakov, Y., and Cheng, W. (2004). Photosynthesis controls of CO2 efflux from maize rhizosphere. Plant Soil 263, 85–99. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047728.61591.fd
Kuzyakov, Y., Raskatov, A., and Kaupenjohann, M. (2003). Turnover and distribution of exudates in Zea mays. Plant Soil 254, 317–327. doi: 10.1023/A:1025515708093
Kuzyakov, Y., and Razavi, B. S. (2019). Rhizosphere size and shape: temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 135, 343–360. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.011
Lee, E. A., and Tollenaar, M. (2007). Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield. Crop Sci. 47, S-202–S-215. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0010IPBS
Lugtenberg, B. J., Dekkers, L., and Bloemberg, G. V. (2001). Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 39, 461–490. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.461
Mar Vázquez, M., César, S., Azcón, R., and Barea, J. M. (2000). Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and other microbial inoculants (Azospirillum, Pseudomonas, Trichoderma) and their effects on microbial population and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of maize plants. Appl. Soil Ecol. 15, 261–272. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00075-5
Mazzola, M., de Bruijn, I., Cohen, M. F., and Raaijmakers, J. M. (2009). Protozoan-induced regulation of cyclic lipopeptide biosynthesis is an effective predation defense mechanism for Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 6804–6811. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01272-09
Mendes, L. W., Raaijmakers, J. M., de Hollander, M., Mendes, R., and Tsai, S. M. (2018). Influence of resistance breeding in common bean on rhizosphere microbiome composition and function. ISME J. 12, 212–224. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.158
Moyano, F. E., Kutsch, W. L., and Schulze, E.-D. (2007). Response of mycorrhizal, rhizosphere and soil basal respiration to temperature and photosynthesis in a barley field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 843–853. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.10.001
Mulero-Aparicio, A., Cernava, T., Turrà, D., Schaefer, A., Di Pietro, A., López-Escudero, F. J., et al. (2019). The role of volatile organic compounds and rhizosphere competence in mode of action of the non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum FO12 toward Verticillium wilt. Front. Microbiol. 10:1808. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01808
Nemergut, D. R., Schmidt, S. K., Fukami, T., O'Neill, S. P., Bilinski, T. M., Stanish, L. F., et al. (2013). Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 342–356. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00051-12
Ning, P., Li, S., Li, X., and Li, C. (2014). New maize hybrids had larger and deeper post-silking root than old ones. Field Crop Res. 166, 66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.009
Nuccio, E. E., Hodge, A., Pett-Ridge, J., Herman, D. J., Weber, P. K., and Firestone, M. K. (2013). An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus significantly modifies the soil bacterial community and nitrogen cycling during litter decomposition. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 1870–1881. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12081
Nuccio, E. E., Starr, E., Karaoz, U., Brodie, E. L., Zhou, J., Tringe, S. G., et al. (2020). Niche differentiation is spatially and temporally regulated in the rhizosphere. ISME J. 14, 999–1014. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0582-x
Oburger, E., Gruber, B., Schindlegger, Y., Schenkeveld, W. D., Hann, S., Kraemer, S. M., et al. (2014). Root exudation of phytosiderophores from soil-grown wheat. New Phytol. 203, 1161–1174. doi: 10.1111/nph.12868
Ofek, M., Voronov-Goldman, M., Hadar, Y., and Minz, D. (2014). Host signature effect on plant root-associated microbiomes revealed through analyses of resident vs. active communities. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2157–2167. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12228
Oger, P. M., Mansouri, H., Nesme, X., and Dessaux, Y. (2004). Engineering root exudation of Lotus toward the production of two novel carbon compounds leads to the selection of distinct microbial populations in the rhizosphere. Microb. Ecol. 47, 96–103. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-2012-9
Oyserman, B. O., Medema, M. H., and Raaijmakers, J. M. (2018). Road MAPs to engineer host microbiomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 43, 46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.11.023
Pagès, L., and Pellerin, S. (1994). Evaluation of parameters describing the root system architecture of field grown maize plants (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 164, 169–176. doi: 10.1007/BF00010068
Park, W. J., Hochholdinger, F., and Gierl, A. (2004). Release of the benzoxazinoids defense molecules during lateral- and crown root emergence in Zea mays. J. Plant Physiol. 161, 981–985. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.005
Peiffer, J. A., Spor, A., Koren, O., Jin, Z., Tringe, S. G., Dangl, J. L., et al. (2013). Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 6548–6553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302837110
Pellerin, S., and Pagès, L. (1994). Evaluation of parameters describing the root system architecture of field grown maize plants (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 164, 155–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00010067
Phillips, D., and Strong, D. (2003). Rhizosphere control points: molecules to food webs. Ecology 84:815. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0815:RCPMTF]2.0.CO;2
Prosser, J. I., Bohannan, B. J., Curtis, T. P., Ellis, R. J., Firestone, M. K., Freckleton, R. P., et al. (2007). The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 384–392. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1643
Qiu, Y., Cooper, J., Kaiser, C., Wisser, R., Mideros, S. X., and Jamann, T. M. (2020). Identification of loci that confer resistance to bacterial and fungal diseases of maize. G3 (Bethesda) 10, 2819–2828. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401104
Quarrie, S. A., Lazić-Jančić, V., Kovačević, D., Steed, A., and Pekić, S. (1999). Bulk segregant analysis with molecular markers and its use for improving drought resistance in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 1299–1306. doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.337.1299
Rodríguez-Caballero, G., Caravaca, F., Fernández-González, A. J., Alguacil, M. M., Fernández-López, M., and Roldán, A. (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation mediated changes in rhizosphere bacterial community structure while promoting revegetation in a semiarid ecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 584-585, 838–848. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.128
Rosenberg, K., Bertaux, J., Krome, K., Hartmann, A., Scheu, S., and Bonkowski, M. (2009). Soil amoebae rapidly change bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana. ISME J. 3, 675–684. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.11
Rossmann, M., Pérez-Jaramillo, J. E., Kavamura, V. N., Chiaramonte, J. B., Dumack, K., Fiore-Donno, A. M., et al. (2020). Multitrophic interactions in the rhizosphere microbiome of wheat: from bacteria and fungi to protists. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 96:fiaa032. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa032
Rudnick, M. B., van Veen, J. A., and de Boer, W. (2015). Baiting of rhizosphere bacteria with hyphae of common soil fungi reveals a diverse group of potentially mycophagous secondary consumers. Soil Biol. Biochem. 88, 73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.015
Rüger, L., Feng, K., Dumack, K., Chen, Y., Sun, R., Wilson, M., et al. (2021). Assembly patterns of the rhizosphere microbiome along the longitudinal root axis of maize (Zea mays L.). Front. Plant Sci. 12:614501. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.614501
Saleem, M., Fetzer, I., Dormann, C. F., Harms, H., and Chatzinotas, A. (2012). Predator richness increases the effect of prey diversity on prey yield. Nat. Commun. 3:1305. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2287
Saleem, M., Fetzer, I., Harms, H., and Chatzinotas, A. (2013). Diversity of protists and bacteria determines predation performance and stability. ISME J. 7, 1912–1921. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.95
Sapp, M., Ploch, S., Fiore-Donno, A. M., Bonkowski, M., and Rose, L. (2017). Protists are an integral part of the Arabidopsis thaliana microbiome. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 30–43. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13941
Sarkar, D., Rovenich, H., Jeena, G., Nizam, S., Tissier, A., Balcke, G. U., et al. (2019). The inconspicuous gatekeeper: endophytic Serendipita vermifera acts as extended plant protection barrier in the rhizosphere. New Phytol. 224, 886–901. doi: 10.1111/nph.15904
Schmidt, J. E., Bowles, T. M., and Gaudin, A. C. M. (2016). Using ancient traits to convert soil health into crop yield: impact of selection on maize root and rhizosphere function. Front. Plant Sci. 7:373. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00373
Schmidt, H., and Eickhorst, T. (2014). Detection and quantification of native microbial populations on soil-grown rice roots by catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 87, 390–402. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12232
Schmidt, H., Nunan, N., Höck, A., Eickhorst, T., Kaiser, C., Woebken, D., et al. (2018). Recognizing patterns: spatial analysis of observed microbial colonization on root surfaces. Front. Environ. Sci. 6:61. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00061
Schreiter, S. S., Babin, D. D., Smalla, K. K., and Grosch, R. R. (2018). Rhizosphere competence and biocontrol effect of Pseudomonas sp. RU47 independent from plant species and soil type at the field scale. Front. Microbiol. 9:97. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00097
Schreiter, S., Sandmann, M., Smalla, K., and Grosch, R. (2014). Soil type dependent rhizosphere competence and biocontrol of two bacterial inoculant strains and their effects on the rhizosphere microbial community of field-grown lettuce. PLoS One 9:e103726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103726
Semenov, A., van Bruggen, A., and Zelenev, V. (1999). Moving waves of bacterial populations and total organic carbon along roots of wheat. Microb. Ecol. 37, 116–128. doi: 10.1007/s002489900136
Song, C. X., Mazzola, M., Cheng, X., Oetjen, J., Alexandrov, T., Dorrestein, P., et al. (2015). Molecular and chemical dialogues in bacteria-protozoa interactions. Sci. Rep. 5:12837. doi: 10.1038/Srep12837
Stelpflug, S. C., Sekhon, R. S., Vaillancourt, B., Hirsch, C. N., Buell, C. R., de Leon, N., et al. (2016). An expanded maize gene expression atlas based on RNA sequencing and its use to explore root development. Plant Genome 9, 1–15. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.04.0025
Stitt, M., and Zeeman, S. C. (2012). Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 282–292. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.03.016
Szoboszlay, M., Lambers, J., Chappell, J., Kupper, J. V., Moe, L. A., and McNear, D. H. (2015). Comparison of root system architecture and rhizosphere microbial communities of balsas teosinte and domesticated corn cultivars. Soil Biol. Biochem. 80, 34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.001
Tai, H., Lu, X., Opitz, N., Marcon, C., Paschold, A., Lithio, A., et al. (2016). Transcriptomic and anatomical complexity of primary, seminal, and crown roots highlight root type-specific functional diversity in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Exp. Bot. 67, 1123–1135. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv513
Toljander, J. F., Santos-González, J. C., Tehler, A., and Finlay, R. D. (2008). Community analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria in the maize mycorrhizosphere in a long-term fertilization trial. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 65, 323–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00512.x
Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., and Singh, B. K. (2020). Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1
van Bruggen, A., Semenov, A., Zelenev, V., Semenov, A., Raaijmakers, J., Sayler, R., et al. (2008). Wave-like distribution patterns of gfp-marked Pseudomonas fluorescens along roots of wheat plants grown in two soils. Microb. Ecol. 55, 466–475. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9292-4
van Dam, N. M., and Bouwmeester, H. J. (2016). Metabolomics in the rhizosphere: tapping into belowground chemical communication. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.008
van den Broek, D., Bloemberg, G., and Lugtenberg, B. (2005). The role of phenotypic variation in rhizosphere Pseudomonas bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1686–1697. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00912.x
van den Broek, D., Chin-A-Woeng, T. F. C., Eijkemans, K., Mulders, I. H. M., Bloemberg, G. V., and Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2003). Biocontrol traits of Pseudomonas spp. are regulated by phase variation. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 16, 1003–1012. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.11.1003
Veach, A. M., Morris, R., Yip, D. Z., Yang, Z. K., Engle, N. L., Cregger, M. A., et al. (2019). Rhizosphere microbiomes diverge among Populus trichocarpa plant-host genotypes and chemotypes, but it depends on soil origin. Microbiome 7:76. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0668-8
Vellend, M. (2010). Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 85, 183–206. doi: 10.1086/652373
Vetterlein, D., Carminati, A., Kögel-Knabner, I., Bienert, G. P., Smalla, K., Oburger, E., et al. (2020). Rhizosphere spatiotemporal organization–A key to Rhizosphere functions. Front. Agron. 2:8. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2020.00008
Vial, L., Groleau, M. C., Lamarche, M. G., Filion, G., Castonguay-Vanier, J., Dekimpe, V., et al. (2010). Phase variation has a role in Burkholderia ambifaria niche adaptation. ISME J. 4, 49–60. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.95
Vílchez, J. I., García-Fontana, C., Román-Naranjo, D., González-López, J., and Manzanera, M. (2016). Plant drought tolerance enhancement by Trehalose production of desiccation-tolerant microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 7:1577. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01577
Walters, W. A., Jin, Z., Youngblut, N., Wallace, J. G., Sutter, J., Zhang, W., et al. (2018). Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 7368–7373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800918115
Wang, X. L., McCully, M. E., and Canny, M. J. (1994). The branch roots of Zea - IV. The maturation and openness of xylem conduits in first-order branches of soil-grown roots. New Phytol. 126, 21–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb07525.x
Wang, J., Rhodes, G., Huang, Q., and Shen, Q. (2018). Plant growth stages and fertilization regimes drive soil fungal community compositions in a wheat-rice rotation system. Biol. Fertil. Soils 54, 731–742. doi: 10.1007/s00374-018-1295-4
Wang, J., Xue, C., Song, Y., Wang, L., Huang, Q., and Shen, Q. (2016). Wheat and Rice growth stages and fertilization regimes alter soil bacterial community structure, but not diversity. Front. Microbiol. 7:1207. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01207
Watt, M., Hugenholtz, P., White, R., and Vinall, K. (2006a). Numbers and locations of native bacteria on field-grown wheat roots quantified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Environ. Microbiol. 8, 871–884. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00973.x
Watt, M., McCully, M. E., and Canny, M. J. (1994). Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L. (effect of soil water content). Plant Physiol. 106, 179–186. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.1.179
Watt, M., McCully, M. E., and Jeffree, C. E. (1993). Plant and bacterial mucilages of the maize rhizosphere: comparison of their soil binding properties and histochemistry in a model system. Plant Soil 151, 151–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00016280
Watt, M., Silk, W., and Passioura, J. (2006b). Rates of root and organism growth, soil conditions, and temporal and spatial development of the rhizosphere. Ann. Bot. 97, 839–855. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl028
Wei, Z., and Jousset, A. (2017). Plant breeding Goes microbial. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 555–558. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.009
Wei, Z., Yang, T., Friman, V. P., Xu, Y., Shen, Q., and Jousset, A. (2015). Trophic network architecture of root-associated bacterial communities determines pathogen invasion and plant health. Nat. Commun. 6:8413. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9413
Weidner, S., Latz, E., Agaras, B., Valverde, C., and Jousset, A. (2016). Protozoa stimulate the plant beneficial activity of rhizospheric pseudomonads. Plant Soil 410, 509–515. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3094-8
Weinert, N., Meincke, R., Gottwald, C., Heuer, H., Schloter, M., Berg, G., et al. (2010). Bacterial diversity on the surface of potato tubers in soil and the influence of the plant genotype. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 74, 114–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00936.x
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., Gardner, A., and Diggle, S. P. (2006). Social evolution theory for microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 597–607. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1461
Wille, L., Messmer, M. M., Studer, B., and Hohmann, P. (2019). Insights to plant–microbe interactions provide opportunities to improve resistance breeding against root diseases in grain legumes. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 20–40. doi: 10.1111/pce.13214
Xavier, L. J. C., and Germida, J. J. (2003). Bacteria associated with Glomus clarum spores influence mycorrhizal activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 471–478. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00003-8
Xiong, W., Guo, S., Jousset, A., Zhao, Q., Wu, H., Li, R., et al. (2017). Bio-fertilizer application induces soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease by reshaping the soil microbiome. Soil Biol. Biochem. 114, 238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.016
Xiong, W., Jousset, A., Guo, S., Karlsson, I., Zhao, Q., Wu, H., et al. (2018). Soil protist communities form a dynamic hub in the soil microbiome. ISME J. 12, 634–638. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.171
Young, K. D. (2006). The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 660–703. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-06
Yu, P., Baldauf, J. A., Lithio, A., Marcon, C., Nettleton, D., Li, C., et al. (2016a). Root type-specific reprogramming of maize pericycle transcriptomes by local high nitrate results in disparate lateral root branching patterns. Plant Physiol. 170, 1783–1798. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01885
Yu, P., Eggert, K., von Wirén, N., Li, C., and Hochholdinger, F. (2015). Cell type-specific gene expression analyses by RNA sequencing reveal local high nitrate-triggered lateral root initiation in shoot-borne roots of maize by modulating auxin-related cell cycle regulation. Plant Physiol. 169, 690–704. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00888
Yu, P., Gutjahr, C., Li, C., and Hochholdinger, F. (2016b). Genetic control of lateral root formation in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 951–961. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.011
Yu, P., and Hochholdinger, F. (2018). The role of host genetic signatures on root–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere and endosphere. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1896. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01896
Yu, P., Wang, C., Baldauf, J. A., Tai, H., Gutjahr, C., Hochholdinger, F., et al. (2018). Root type and soil phosphate determine the taxonomic landscape of colonizing fungi and the transcriptome of field-grown maize roots. New Phytol. 217, 1240–1253. doi: 10.1111/nph.14893
Zee, P. C., and Fukami, T. (2018). Priority effects are weakened by a short, but not long, history of sympatric evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285:20171722. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1722
Zelenev, V. V., van Bruggen, A. H. C., Leffelaar, P. A., Bloem, J., and Semenov, A. M. (2006). Oscillating dynamics of bacterial populations and their predators in response to fresh organic matter added to soil: the simulation model BACWAVE-WEB Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 1690–1711. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.11.024
Zelenev, V., Van Bruggen, A., and Semenov, A. (2005). Modeling wave-like dynamics of oligotrophic and copiotrophic bacteria along wheat roots in response to nutrient input from a growing root tip. Ecol. Model. 188, 404–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.046
Zhang, X., Kuzyakov, Y., Zang, H., Dippold, M. A., Shi, L., Spielvogel, S., et al. (2020). Rhizosphere hotspots: root hairs and warming control microbial efficiency, carbon utilization and energy production. Soil Biol. Biochem. 148:107872. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107872
Zhao, B. Y., Ardales, E., Brasset, E., Claflin, L. E., Leach, J. E., and Hulbert, S. H. (2004). The Rxo1/Rba1 locus of maize controls resistance reactions to pathogenic and non-host bacteria. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 71–79. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1623-y
Keywords: rhizosphere, microbiota, protists, community assembly, microbiome, spatiotemporal dynamics, self-organization
Citation: Bonkowski M, Tarkka M, Razavi BS, Schmidt H, Blagodatskaya E, Koller R, Yu P, Knief C, Hochholdinger F and Vetterlein D (2021) Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Maize (Zea mays L.) Root Growth and Its Potential Consequences for the Assembly of the Rhizosphere Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 12:619499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.619499
Edited by:
Massimo Reverberi, Sapienza University of Rome, ItalyReviewed by:
Lucas William Mendes, University of São Paulo, BrazilJennifer Elise Schmidt, University of California, Davis, United States
Copyright © 2021 Bonkowski, Tarkka, Razavi, Schmidt, Blagodatskaya, Koller, Yu, Knief, Hochholdinger and Vetterlein. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Michael Bonkowski, m.bonkowski@uni-koeln.de