ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 16 December 2020

Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.618942

Multi-Locus Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Fungal Complex Associated With Rusty Root Rot of Panax ginseng in China

  • 1. Engineering Research Center, Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China

  • 2. Institute of Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

Abstract

Panax ginseng rusty root rot caused by the Ilyonectria species complex is a devastating disease, and it is one of the main factors contributing to the difficulty in continual cropping. Rusty root rot occurs in all ginseng fields, but little is known about the taxonomy of the fungal pathogen complex, especially Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like species. Rusty root rot samples were collected from commercial ginseng cultivation areas of China, and the pathogens were isolated and purified as single spores. Based on the combination analysis of multiple loci (rDNA-ITS, TUB, HIS3, TEF, ACT, LSU, RPB1, RPB2, and SSU) and morphological characteristics, the pathogens causing ginseng rusty root rot were determined. Fungal isolates were obtained from infected roots in 56 locations within main cultivation areas in China. A total of 766 strains were identified as Ilyonectria, Ilyonectria-like and Rhexocercosporidium species, including I. robusta (55.0%), I. communis (21.7%), I. mors-panacis (10.9%), I. pseudodestructans (2.0%), I. changbaiensis (1.3%), I. qitaiheensis (1.3%), Neonectria obtusispora (2.0%), Dactylonectria torresensis (0.5%), D. sp. (0.5%), and R. panacis (1.5%), and four novel species, Thelonectria ginsengicola (1.0%), T. jixiensis (1.0%), T. mulanensis (0.8%) and T. fusongensis (0.5%), with a total of 14 species. As the pathogen present in the highest proportion, I. robusta was the most prevalent and damaging species, unlike the pathogens reported previously. All of the examined strains were proven to cause ginseng rusty root rot. Our results indicate that the taxonomy of the fungal complex associated with ginseng rusty root rot includes Ilyonectria, Ilyonectria-like genera (Dactylonectria, Neonectria, and Thelonectria) and Rhexocercosporidium.

Introduction

Panax ginseng is one of the most cultivated medicinal plants in China, and the quality of ginseng greatly influences the quality of cosmetics, health care products and medicines that use ginseng as a raw material (Baranov, 1966; Hu, 1977). Ginseng rusty root rot is caused by Ilyonectria/Cylindrocarpon or Ilyonectria/Cylindrocarpon-like species, and it is the most devastating chronic disease and the greatest threat to ginseng (Panax ginseng) cultivation (Guan et al., 2020). Rusty root rot may cause 30% loss of ginseng, and it can be found in all ginseng planting areas. Rusty root rot has always been one of the important factors that interferes with the maintenance of continuous ginseng cropping. The incidence of rusty root rot in 2-year-old ginseng continuous cropping is 95.8% (Cho et al., 1995).

All parts of the ginseng root may be infected, and the infected root exhibits reddish brown dry rot with a gully appearing on most of the root. The infection stops with increased temperature, and some parts of the ginseng root may undergo self-healing, but the gully or dry rot scars remain. The appearance of ginseng root rot and the degree of damage greatly influence the value of ginseng (Zhou et al., 2017). Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like species are common soil fungi, opportunistic plant root pathogens, or asymptomatic root endophytes (Seifert et al., 2003). Ginseng seeds also carry Ilyonectria pathogens that may pose a threat to ginseng cultivation (Guan et al., 2019). Ilyonectria fungi play an important role in black foot rot in grapevines (Halleen et al., 2004; Halleen et al., 2006a,b), apple replant disease (Tewoldemedhin et al., 2011), and beech cankers (Castlebury et al., 2006); the affected plants are representative hosts of economic importance, especially the lignified roots of perennials. Thus, Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like species are commonly associated with rot and decay of woody and herbaceous plants (Domsch et al., 2007).

The pathogen associated with root rot disease of Panax quinguefaliam was first extracted by Zinnsmeister (1918), and it was designated Ramularia destructans. Similar diseases were found by Chou and Chung on ginseng in China and Korea (Chung, 1979; Wang, 2001). Scholten established the new species C. destructans, and R. destructans was treated as a synonym (Scholten, 1964).

Neonectria/Cylindrocarpon is a paraphyletic based on phylogenetic analysis (Mantiri et al., 2001; Halleen et al., 2004; Hirooka et al., 2005; Castlebury et al., 2006). The Neonectria complex was divided into four genera (Ilyonectria, Neonectria/Cylindrocarpon, Rugonectria and Thelonectria) based on a combination of morphological characteristics. Ilyonectria replaced the N. radicicola group based on the description by Booth (1966); Seifert et al. (2003), and the corresponding Cylindrocarpon also became Ilyonectria (Mantiri et al., 2001).

I. destructans was linked to the teleomorph I. radicicola (Booth, 1966; Samuels and Brayford, 1990; Chaverri et al., 2011). Based on a phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (rDNA-ITS) gene sequences, Schroers et al. concluded that the I. radicicola complex included C. destructans, C. destructans var. crassum, I. coprosmae, I. liriodendri, N. austroradicicola and N. macroconidialis (Schroers et al., 2007). The rDNA-ITS, β-tubulin (TUB), histone H3 (HIS3) and translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF) genes were used to support the I. radicicola species complex, and HIS3 was the most contributing gene (Cabral et al., 2012b). Sixty-eight strains of pathogenic fungi from ginseng and other hosts were once considered C. destructans within four groups: I. mors-panacis, I. robusta, I. panacis, and I. crassa (Cabral et al., 2012a). Lu et al. (2020) obtained 230 isolates and believed that ginseng red-sin root was caused by 12 species, including Fusarium, Dactylonectria, Ilyonectria and others.

Thelonectria was first classified in Cylindrocarpon and first described in 2011 to accommodate grouping in the Cylindrocarpon classification (Chaverri et al., 2011). However, the forms isolated from soil were the asexual states of Thelonectria. Thelonectria and related species with Cylindrocarpon-like morphology were redefined using molecular phylogenetic techniques (Chaverri et al., 2011; Salgado-Salazar et al., 2012, 2013, 2015). The observation that R. panacis causes ginseng rusted root rot was reported for the first time in 2006, after more than 70 years of the disease (Reeleder et al., 2006; Reeleder, 2007).

In this work, we report the population structure of pathogens associated with ginseng rusty root rot. In the commercial ginseng cultivation areas in China, 90% of rusty root rot is thought to be caused by I. destructans (Wang, 2001), but the experimental data support different conclusions. The present study determined that the pathogens that cause rusty root rot disease of ginseng are consistently associated with a fungal complex species, and management strategies must be developed.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection, Fungal Isolation, and Morphological Observation

Fresh ginseng roots with rusty root rot symptoms (Figure 1) were collected between 2017 and 2019 from 56 sampling locations in northeast China that corresponded to the commercial ginseng-producing areas of China (Figure 2). The junction of the healthy and diseased parts was cut into 25-mm3 pieces, and the surfaces of the pieces were disinfected by immersion in 1% NaOCl for 2 min and washing three times with sterile water. The pieces were evenly placed on water agar (WA) medium and cultured in the dark at 22°C. Colonies were collected for 15-21 days, purified and cultured from single spores (Punja, 1997). The cultures were transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium and synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA) and cultured in the dark for 20-60 days, and the characteristics of the resulting cultures were recorded. The isolates were cultivated on PDA supplemented with ginseng roots under continuous near-ultraviolet light (n-UV, 315-400 nm), and the characteristics of conidiophore cells and the shape and size of chlamydospores and conidia were observed. Images and measurements were acquired using a KEYENCE VXH-5000 digital microscope system (Osaka, Japan).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Colonies grown for 15 days were collected for DNA extraction. DNA was obtained by following the procedures described in the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen 69104, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Each 50-μl PCR aliquot contained 25 ml of premix (Takara R045, Kusatsu, Japan; the error rate of the DNA polymerase is 0.02%), 2 μl of each primer (10 μM), 1 μl of DNA (500 ng/μl), and 20 μl of double-distilled H2O. The following PCR program was used to obtain the sequences of the actin gene (ACT), rDNA-ITS, the 28S ribosomal RNA gene (LSU), the gene encoding RNA polymerase II largest subunit (RPB1), the gene encoding RNA polymerase II second-largest subunit (RPB2), 18S ribosomal RNA (SSU), TEF, TUB and HIS3: 95°C for 3 min; 30 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, annealing temperature for 15 s, 72°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 10 min; the sample was then held at 4°C. The amplicons were analyzed using 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis in 0.5 × TAE buffer (150 V for 25 min) and purified using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen 28004, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Details regarding the PCR primers and annealing temperatures are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Gene regionPrimerDirectionAnnealing temperature (°C)References
Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacerV9Gsense51de Hoog and van den Ende, 1998
ITS4antisense
ActinACT512Fsense51Carbone and Kohn, 1999; Groenewald et al., 2013
ACT1RDantisense
28S ribosomal RNA geneLRORsense48Vilgalys and Hester, 1990; Moncalvo et al., 2000
LR5antisense
RNA polymerase II largest subunitRPB1asense55Castlebury et al., 2004
RPB1cantisense
Histone H3 geneCYLH3Fsense50Crous et al., 2004
CYLH3Rantisense
RNA polymerase II second-largest subunitRPB2-7cfsense54Liu et al., 1999
RPB2-11aRantisense
18S ribosomal RNA geneNS1sense55Gargas and Taylor, 1992
SR7antisense
β-tubulinBT3sense52Lu et al., 2020; O’Donnell and Cigelnik, 1997
BT4antisense
T1sense
T2antisense
Translation elongation factor 1-alphaCYLEF-1sense55Carbone and Kohn, 1999; Crous et al., 2004
CYLEF-R2antisense
EF728sense
EF1567antisense

Details regarding the PCR primers used in species identification and gene sequencing.

DNA Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

The purified amplicons were sequenced in both directions by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China), and the sequences were assembled using Seqman (v8.1). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the combined rDNA-ITS, TUB, HIS3 and TEF genes for analyses of Dactylonectria, Ilyonectria and Neonectria, and the analysis of Thelonectria was based on a combination of the ACT, rDNA-ITS, LSU, RPB1, RPB2, SSU, TEF and TUB genes. All sequences were homologously aligned by mega 7.06. A maximum parsimony (MP) method was used to construct a phylogenetic tree in the PAUP 4.0b program. The MP analyses were performed with the heuristic search option, and 100 random sequence additions were used to find the global optimum tree. The gaps were treated as missing data, and the strength of the internal branches of the resulting trees was tested with bootstrap analysis using 1000 replications. The consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), and rescaled consistency index (RC) of the tree were also calculated. Detailed information on the sequences of the genes whose accession numbers were applied for in the NCBI database, including all strains used for phylogeny, is shown in Tables 2, 3.

TABLE 2

SpeciesStrainaOriginGenBank accession numberb
rDNA-ITSTUBHIS3TEF1-αACTLSURPB1RPB2SSU
D. alcacerensisIAFM Cy20-1SpainJF735332AM419104JF735629JF735818
D. alcacerensis129087PortugalJF735333AM419111JF735630JF735819
D. anthruriicolaCBS 564.95NetherlandsJF735302JF735430JF735579JF735768
D. estremocensisCy135PortugalAM419069AM419105JF735615JF735804
D. estremocensisCBS 129085PortugalJF735320JF735448JF735617JF735806
D. hordeicolaCBS 162.89NetherlandsAM419060AM419084JF735610JF735799
D. hordeicola3S07ChinaMF350482MF350428MF350455MF350509
D. macrodidymaCBS 112615South AfricaAY677290AY677233JF735647JF735836
D. macrodidymaCBS 112601South AfricaAY677284AY677229JF735644JF735833
D. novozelandicaCBS 112608South AfricaAY677288AY677235JF735632JF735821
D. novozelandicaCBS 113552New ZealandJF735334AY677237JF735633JF735822
D. pinicolaCBS 159.34UK: EnglandJF735318JF735446JF735613JF735802
D. pinicolaCBS 173.37GermanyJF735319JF735447JF735614JF735803
D. sp.Q18-22ChinaMT678572*MT810745*MT800956*MT800973*
D. sp.Q18-23ChinaMT678573*MT810746*MT800957*MT800974*
D. torresensisCBS 129086PortugalJF735362JF735492JF735681JF735870
D. torresensisCBS 113555New ZealandJF735350AY677234JF735661JF735850
D. torresensisDT2ChinaMT678571*MT810744*MT800955*MT800972*
D. vitisCBS 129082PortugalJF735303JF735431JF735580JF735769
I. changbaiensisCGMCC 3.18789ChinaMF350464MF350410MF350437MF350491
I. changbaiensis72R2ChinaMF350465MF350411MF350438MF350492
I. changbaiensisCB4-7ChinaMT678567*MT810740*MT800951*MT800968*
I. changbaiensisQ24-5ChinaMT678568*MT810741*MT800952*MT800969*
I. communisCGMCC 3.18788ChinaMF350402MF350402MF350429MF350483
I. communisJ410ChinaMF350457MF350403MF350430MF350484
I. communisCB4-2ChinaMT678565*MT810738*MT800949*MT800966*
I. communisH1-9ChinaMT678566*MT810739*MT800950*MT800967*
I. coprosmaeCBS 119606CanadaJF735260JF735373JF735505JF735694
I. crassaCBS 129083CanadaAY295311JF735395JF735536JF735725
I. crassaCBS 158.31JF735694JF735276JF735394JF735535JF735724
I. cyclaminicolaCBS 302.93NetherlandsJF735304JF735432JF735581JF735770
I. cyclaminicolaEFA-444SpainMF440369MF797792MF471472MH070096
I. destructansCBS 264.65SwedenAY677273AY677256JF735506JF735695
I. europaeaCBS 102892GermanyJF735295JF735422JF735569JF735758
I. europaeaCBS 129078PortugalJF735294JF735421JF735567JF735756
I. gamsiiCBS 940.97NetherlandsAM419065AM419089JF735577JF735766
I. leucospermiCBS 13289South AfricaJX231161JX231113JX231145JX231129
I. leucospermiCBS 132810South AfricaJX231162JX231114JX231146JX231130
I. liliigenaCBS 732.74NetherlandsJF735298JF735426JF735574JF735763
I. liliigenaCBS 189.49NetherlandsJF735297JF735425JF735573JF735762
I. liriodendriCBS 117526PortugalDQ178164DQ178171JF735508JF735697
I. liriodendriCBS 110.81United StatesDQ178163DQ178170JF735507JF735696
I. lusitanicaCBS 129080PortugalJF735296JF735423JF735570JF735759
I. mors-panasisCBS 306.35CanadaJF735288JF735414JF735557JF735746
I. mors-panasisH6-1ChinaMT678563*MT810736*MT800947*MT800964*
I. mors-panasisXFC1ChinaMT678564*MT810737*MT800948*MT800965*
I. panasisCBS 129079CanadaAY295316JF735424JF735572JF735761
I. palmarumCBS 135753ItalyHF937432HF922609HF922621HF922615
I. palmarumCBS 135754ItalyHF937431HF922608HF922620HF922614
I. protearumCBS 132812South AfricaJX231165JX231117JX231149JX231133
I. protearumCBS 132811South AfricaJX231157JX231109JX231141JX231125
I. pseudodestructansCBS 129081PortugalAJ875330AM419091JF735563JF735752
I. pseudodestructansCBS 117824AustriaJF735292JF735419JF735562JF735751
I. pseudodestructansZP2ChinaMT678561*MT810734*MT800945*MT800962*
I. pseudodestructansPR20-11ChinaMT678562*MT810735*MT800946*MT800963*
I. qitaiheensisCGMCC 3.18787ChinaMF350472MF350418MF350445MF350499
I. qitaiheensisJ919ChinaMF350473MF350419MF350446MF350500
I. qitaiheensisR3-2ChinaMT678569*MT810742*MT800953*MT800970*
I. qitaiheensisPR14 25ChinaMT678570*MT810743*MT800954*MT800971*
I. robustaCBS 117818AustriaJF735267JF735382JF735523JF735712
I. robustaCBS 129084PortugalJF735273JF735391JF735532JF735721
I. robustaH8-5ChinaMT678559*MT810732*MT800943*MT800960*
I. robustaCB13-12ChinaMT678560*MT810733*MT800944*MT800961*
I. rufaCBS 153.37FranceAY677271AY677251JF735540JF735729
I. rufaCBS 640.77FranceJF735277JF735399JF735542JF735731
I. gCBS 142253ItalyKY304649KY304755KY304621KY304727
I. strelitziaeCBS 142254ItalyKY304651KY304757KY304623KY304729
I. vredehoekensisCBS 132807South AfricaJX231155JX231107JX231139JX231123
I. vredehoekensisCBS 132808South AfricaJX231159JX231111JX231143JX231127
N. coccineaCBS 119158GermanyJF268759KC660727JF268734
N. faginataCBS 217.67CanadaHQ840385JF268730JF268746
N. faginataCBS 119160United StatesHQ840384DQ789883DQ789740
N. lugdunenisCBS 1254585ChinaKM231762KM232019KM231482KM231187
N. obtusisporaCBS 183.36GermanyAM419061AM419085JF735607JF735796
N. obtusisporaCPC 13544CanadaAY295306JF735443JF735608JF735797
N. obtusisporaH7-6ChinaMT678574VMT810747*MT800958*MT800975*
N. obtusisporaQ12-4ChinaMT678575*MT810748*MT800959VMT800976*
N. puniceaCBS 242.29GermanyKC660522DQ789873DQ789730
N. puniceaCBS 119724AustriaKC660469DQ789824KC660431
N. ramulariaeCBS 151.29EnglandAY677291JF735438JF735602JF735791
N. ramulariaeCBS 182.36UnknownHM054157JF735439JF735603JF735792
N. shennongjianaCBS 127475ChinaMH864598KJ022346KJ022406
N. shennongjianaHMAS 183185ChinaFJ560440FJ860057
Rhexocercosporidium panacisRP17ChinaMT814852*MT822282*MT822281*
T. acrotylaIMI 345086VenezuelaKJ021971KJ022293KJ022347KJ022238KJ022026KJ022407KJ022590KJ022212
T. acrotylaCBS 123766VenezuelaJQ403329JQ394720JQ394751JQ365047JQ403368JQ403407
T. amamiensisMAFF 239820JapanJQ403338JQ394728KJ022349JQ365055JQ403376JQ403413KJ022595KJ022216
T. amamiensisMAFF 239819JapanJQ403337JQ394727KJ022348JQ365054JQ403375KJ022408KJ022594KJ022215
T. blackeriellaCBS 142200ItalyKX778711KX778702KX778687KX778690KX778693
T. cidariaCBS 132324Costa RicaKJ021972JQ394715KJ022351JQ365043JQ403324JQ403402KJ022508KJ022153
T. cidariaIMI 325844JamaicaKJ021973JQ394707JQ394741KJ022239KJ022027JQ403392KJ022508KJ022130
T. coronalisCBS 132337ChinaJQ403343JQ394732JQ394761KJ022240MH877458JQ403418KJ022459KJ022080
T. coronalisCBS 132338ChinaJQ403344JQ394733KJ022352KJ022241JQ403381JQ403419KJ022462KJ022083
T. coronataIMI 325241IndonesiaJQ403326JQ394717KJ394749JQ365044JQ403365JQ403404KJ022164KJ022542
T. coronataCBS 132322Costa RicaJQ403320JQ394711JQ294736JQ365040JQ403360JQ403397KJ022521KJ022523
T. diademataCBS 132331ArgentinaJQ403308JQ394700JQ394736JQ365029JQ403308JQ403384KJ022099KJ022474
T. diademataCBS 132332ArgentinaJQ403351KJ022321KJ022383JQ365032JQ403311KJ403387KJ022099KJ022478
T. gongylodesCBS 124611United StatesJQ403318JQ394710JQ394744JQ365038HQ403358JQ403395KJ022514KJ022136
T. gongylodesIMI 343571United StatesJQ403331JQ394721JQ394752JQ365048JQ403370JQ403408KJ022564KJ022186
T. nodosaCBS 124742United StatesJQ403306JQ394699JQ394735JQ365028JQ403346JQ403383KJ022469KJ022090
T. nodosaCBS 132327United StatesJQ403317JQ394709JQ394743JQ365037JQ403357JQ403394KJ022513KJ022135
T. olidaCBS 215. 67GermanyKJ021982KM232024HM352884KJ022058HM364334KM232342
T. stemmataCBS 112468JamaicaJQ403312JQ394704JQ394739JQ365033JQ403352JQ403388KJ022502KJ022124
T. stemmataCBS 132336JamaicaJQ403313JQ394705KJ022384JQ365034JQ403353JQ403389KJ022503KJ022125
T. torulosaCBS 136782CameroonKJ022007KJ022390KJ022274KJ022038KJ022438KJ022519KJ022141
T. torulosaCBS 132339ArgentinaJQ403309JQ394701KJ022389JQ365030JQ403349JQ403385KJ022473KJ022094
T. truncataMAFF 241521JapanJQ403339KJ022325JQ394757JQ365056JQ403377JQ403414KJ022601KJ022222
T. veuillotianaCBS 132341Azores IslandJQ403305JQ394698JQ394734KJ022273JQ403345JQ403382KJ022465KJ022086
T. veuillotianaCBS 124114FranceJQ403335JQ394725JQ394755GQ505980GQ506005GQ506034KJ022568KJ022190
T. westlandicaICMP 10387New ZealandKF569844KJ569871KF569861KF569834KF569852KF569880KJ022577KJ022199
T. westlandicaIMI 255610New ZealandKF569843KF569870KF569862KF569833KF569853KF569881KJ022581KJ0222033
T. ginsengcolaCGMCC 3.20154; R9ChinaMT742968*MT792252*MT792268*MT792260*MT742978*MT792236*MT792244*MT742994*
T. ginsengcolaR4ChinaMT742969*MT792253*MT792269*MT792261*MT742979*MT792237*MT792245*MT742995*
T. mulanensisCGMCC 3.20155; Q20-8ChinaMT742970*MT792254*MT792270*MT792262*MT742980*MT792238*MT792246*MT742996*
T. mulanensisQ20-5ChinaMT742971*MT792255*MT792271*MT792263*MT742981*MT792239*MT792247*MT742997*
T. fusongensisCGMCC 3.20153; R1-8ChinaMT742972*MT792256*MT792272*MT792264*MT742982*MT792240*MT792248*MT742998*
T. fusongensisP4ChinaMT742973*MT792257*MT792273*MT792265*MT742983*MT792241*MT792249*MT742999*
T. jixiensisCGMCC 3.20156; Q21-5ChinaMT742974*MT792258*MT792274*MT792266*MT742984*MT792242*MT792250*MT743000*
T. jixiensisQ21-1ChinaMT742975*MT792259*MT792275*MT792267*MT742985*MT792243*MT792251*MT743001*
Cinnmomeonectria cinammomeaCBS 133756French GuianaKJ021979KJ022341KJ022393KJ0221286KJ022072KJ022451KJ022584KJ022206

Strains analyzed in this study.

aIAFM, Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain; CBS, culture collection of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands; CPC, Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; ICMP, International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants, Auckland, New Zealand; IMI, International Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, United Kingdom; CGMCC, China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China. brDNA-ITS, Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer; HIS3, histone H3 gene; TEF-1a, translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene; TUB, β-tubulin gene; ACT, actin gene; LSU, 28S ribosomal RNA gene; RPB1, RNA polymerase II largest subunit gene; RPB2, RNA polymerase II second-largest subunit gene; SSU, 18S ribosomal RNA gene. *Sequences newly generated in this study.

TABLE 3

SpeciesStrainOriginCollection dateHostYears
D. sp.Q18-22Yongqing Town, Antu City, Jilin Province, China08, 2019P. ginseng3
D. sp.Q18-23Xinhe Town, Antu City, Jilin Province, China09, 2018P. ginseng4
D. torresensisDT2Duling Town, Tonghua City, Jilin Proinvce, China06, 2017P. ginseng4
I. changbaiensisCB4-7Beigang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China07, 2019P. ginseng4
I. changbaiensisQ24-5Datougou Town, Wangqing City, Jilin Province, China08, 2018P. ginseng3
I. communisCB4-2Dongbeicha Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China08, 2018P. ginseng3
I. communisH1-9Hulin Town, Jixi City, Heilongjiang Province, China09, 2017P. ginseng4
I. mors-panasisH6-1Hailun Town, Hailun City, Heilongjiang Province, China09, 2019P. ginseng5
I. mors-panasisXFC1Xigang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China06, 2018P. ginseng3
I. pseudodestructansZP2Zuojia Town, Jili City, Jilin Province, China06.2018P. ginseng4
I. pseudodestructansPR20-11Datougou Town, Wangqing City, Jilin Province, China06, 2018P. ginseng5
I. qitaiheensisR3-2Longquan Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China06, 2018P. ginseng3
I. qitaiheensisPR14 25Fusong County, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China06, 2018P. ginseng3
I. robustaH8-5Hailin Town, Mudanjiang City, Heilongjiang Province, China08, 2019P. ginseng4
I. robustaCB13-12Wanliang Town, Fusong County, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China08, 2019P. ginseng2
N. obtusisporaH7-6Zhanhe Town, Heihe City, Heilongjiang08, 2019P. ginseng3
N. obtusisporaQ12-4Longquan Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China08, 2019P. ginseng4
Rhexocercosporidium panacisRP17Yulin Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China08, 2019P. ginseng3
T. ginsengcolaCGMCC 3.20154; R9Dongbeicha Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China07, 2018P. ginseng4
T. ginsengcolaR4Quanyang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China07, 2018P. ginseng3
T. mulanensisCGMCC 3.20155; Q20-8Bayan Town, Mulan County, Heilongjiang, China06, 2017P. ginseng4
T. mulanensisQ20-5Mulan Town, Mulan County, Heilongjiang, China06, 2017P. ginseng4
T. fusongensisCGMCC 3.20153; R1-8Fusong Town, Fusong County, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China06, 2017P. ginseng3
T. fusongensisP4Wanliang Town, Fusong County, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China06, 2017P. ginseng3
T. jixiensisCGMCC 3.20156; Q21-5Hulin Town, Jixi City, Heilongjiang Province, China08, 2018P. ginseng4
T. jixiensisQ21-1Hulin Town, Jixi City, Heilongjiang Province, China07, 2018P. ginseng3

Detailed information on the collection of isolates used in sequencing and pathogenicity testing.

Pathogenicity Tests

The 26 newly sequenced strains were also subjected to pathogenicity testing (Table 3). The pathogenicity of the isolates was evaluated on 3-year-old detached ginseng roots (cultivar: Damaya) using an improved published method in vitro (Lu et al., 2020). The fresh ginseng roots were washed, wiped with 75% alcohol, and rinsed with sterile water. Healthy ginseng roots were inoculated by placing 50 μl of 1 × 105/ml spore suspension taken from the edges of actively growing colonies on PDA plates into premade holes 4 mm in diameter and 1 mm deep. Two to three holes per root and four replicated roots were inoculated for each isolate, and sterile water was used as the control. The ginseng roots were cultured in a fresh-keeping box at 25°C in the dark and evaluated after 7 days. The same strain and disinfection method were used to inoculate whole plants in the greenhouse (25°C, 78% humidity). After disinfection, 3-year-old ginseng seedlings were dipped into a 1 × 105/ml spore suspension for 20 min and then transferred to pots containing sterile sand, with 6 plants per pot. Each group was grown in triplicate. The inoculum was treated with sterile water as a control. After 2 months, plant infection was evaluated.

Results

Population Structure of Fungal Complex Associated With Ginseng Rusty Root Rot

A total of 766 isolates were obtained from ginseng roots that showed typical signs of rusty root rot disease. All of these strains were determined by sequencing and morphological characteristics, and 26 strains from each genus were randomly selected for phylogenetic analysis. A total of 14 species (Figures 3, 4) were identified as Ilyonectria, Ilyonectria-like and Rhexocercosporidium species.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 4

The Ilyonectria species complex included I. robusta, I. communis, I. mors-panacis, I. pseudodestructans, I. changbaiensis and I. qitaiheensis, and the isolate proportions were 55.0%, 21.7%, 10.9%, 2.0%, 1.3% and 1.3%, respectively. Ilyonectria-like contained three genera that were also members of the Nectriaceae family: Dactylonectria, Neonectria and Thelonectria. N. obtusispora, D. torresensis and D. sp. accounted for 2.0%, 0.5% and 0.5% of the population, respectively. Four novel species are named in this article: T. ginsengicola (1.0%), the type strain is R9; T. jixiensis (1.0%), the type strain is Q21-5; T. mulanensis (0.8%), the type strain is Q20-8 and T. fusongensis (0.5%), the type strain is R1-8. R. panacis was the only pathogen except Ilyonectria-like that was present at an abundance of 1.5%.I. communis, I. pseudodestructans, I. changbaiensis, I. qitaiheensis, N. obtusispora, D. torresensis, T. jixiensis, T. mulanensis, T. fusongensis and T. ginsengicola were first reported to cause ginseng rusty root rot. Thelonectria is also the first Ilyonectria-like genus reported to cause ginseng rusty root rot. I. robusta was the dominant pathogen and appeared in the largest proportion; this is the greatest difference between our results and previous conclusions. The number of fungal isolates recovered from each sampling location in China is shown in Table 4.

TABLE 4

LocationABCDEFGHIJKLMN
Jindou Town, Tonghua City, Jilin Province, China1221
Chaoyang Forestry Centre, Tonghua City, Jilin Province, China722
Sanyuanpu Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China961
Duling Town, Tonghua City, Jilin Proinvce, China52
Fujiang Town, Tonghua City, Jilin Province, China441
Jiangdianzi Town, Tonghua City, Jilin Province, China62
Qinghe Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China10
Yulin Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China732
Shuangcha Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China8
Maxian Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China6
Linghou Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China751
Taishang Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China111
Sankeyushu Town, Jian City, Jilin Province, China6
Zuojia Town, Jili City, Jilin Province, China36
Longfeng Forestry Centre, Jiaohe City, Jilin Province, China3
Wulin Town, Jiaohe City, Jilin Province, China4
Qianjin Town, Jiaohe City, Jilin Province, China6
Dongbeicha Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China171233
Longquan Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China81142241
Xingshen Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China1931
Beigang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China1194111
Quanyang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China106511
Erdaogang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China17832
Donggang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China13552
Xigang Town, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China7562
Fusong County, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China612232
Wanliang Town, Fusong County, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China2642
Toudao Town, Helong City, Jilin Province, China35
Datougou Town, Wangqing City, Jilin Province, China7221
Fuxing Town, Wangqing City, Jilin Province, China8
Luozigou Town, Wangqing City, Jilin Province, China6
Manzu Town, Hunchun City, Jilin Province, China5352
Yangpao Town, Hunchun City, Jilin Province, China43
Yingan Town, Dunhau City, Jilin Province, China86
Qiuligou Town, Dunhau City, Jilin Province, China453
Dashitou Town, Dunhau City, Jilin Province, China9
Yongqing Town, Antu City, Jilin Province, China112
Yongqing Town, Antu City, Jilin Province, China222
Xinhe Town, Antu City, Jilin Province, China92
Fuxing Town, Fuxin City, Liaoning Province, China10
Huanren Town, Huanren City, Liaoning Province, China3
Xinbin Town, Xinbin City, Liaoning Province, China21
Hulin Town, Jixi City, Heilongjiang Province, China55313
Hulin Town, Jixi City, Heilongjiang Province, China52625
Hailin Town, Mudanjiang City, Heilongjiang Province, China842
Ningan Town, Mudanjiang City, Heilongjiang Province, China6211
Dongjing Town, Mudanjiang City, Heilongjiang Province, China3113
Yongshun Town, Qitaihe City, Heilongjiang Province, China6531
Hailun Town, Hailun City, Heilongjiang Province, China1146
Binzhou Town, Haerbin City, Heilongjiang Province, China2221
Bayan Town, Mulan County, Heilongjiang, China93313
Mulan Town, Mulan County, Heilongjiang, China9543
Shangzhi Town, Shangzhi City, Heilongjiang, China862
Zhanhe Town, Heihe City, Heilongjiang, China11812
Qingan Town, Suihua City, Heilongjiang, China12
Tieli Town, Yichun City, Heilongjiang, China1151
Total421166841510101544118864

Fungal isolates recovered from Panax ginseng with rusty root rot symptoms in China.

A, I. robusta; B, I. communis; C, I. mors-panacis; D, I. pseudodestructans; E, I. changbaiensis; F, I. qitaiheensis; G, N. obtusispora; H, D. torresensis; I, D. sp.; J, R. panacis; K, T. ginsengicola; L, T. jixiensis; M, T. mulanensis; N, T. fusongensis.

Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequences of rDNA-ITS, TEF, TUB and HIS3 were obtained using polymerase chain reaction amplicons and were analyzed in Dactylonectria, Ilyonectria, and Neonectria. Low-quality sequences were removed after base alignment to obtain the sequences of rDNA-ITS (491 bp), HIS3 (472 bp), TEF (507 bp), and TUB (467 bp). The sequences were combined, and a sequence with a total length of 2231 bp, including alignment gaps, was used to build a phylogenetic tree (Figure 3). Similarly, ACT (575 bp), rDNA-ITS (533 bp), LSU (700 bp), RPB1 (630 bp), RPB2 (856 bp), SSU (521 bp), TEF (858 bp), and TUB (479 bp) were combined, resulting in a total length of 4422 bp including alignment gaps, and analyzed for Thelonectria (Figure 4). All of the sequences were topologically congruent, and the results indicated that Dactylonectria, Ilyonectria, Neonectria and Thelonectria formed a single clade. The isolated strains were divided into 14 highly supported clades; the branches containing I. rubosta, I. mors-panacis and other known species were highly consistent with species type or verified species.

Four novel species were divided into independent clades, and they were supported with 90-100% bootstrap support for T. mulanensis, T. jixiensis, T. fusongensis and T. ginsengicola (Figure 4). For D. sp., we observed only a few macroconidia, and the specific sporulation structure and other morphological characteristics were not clear. Therefore, the species is not named here. Similarly, a separate gene phylogenetic tree was constructed for Thelonectria, with the least information obtained from the SSU and TUB genes, and the lowest contribution. ACT and RPB2 were the most informative and were key to distinguishing the phylogenetic tree of all of the known candidate strains and four novel species. The combined use of rDNA-ITS, TUB, TEF, and LSU genes will aid in the classification and analysis of all candidate species. The four novel species of Thelonectria belong to the T. coronata complex classification reported in 2016 (Salgado-Salazar et al., 2016). The three closely related species T. mulanensis, T. fusongensis, and T. jixiensis have nucleotide sequence differences in their ACT, rDNA-ITS, LSU, RPB1, RPB2, SSU, TEF and TUB genes (Table 5). There is no nucleotide difference in the SSU gene, 1 bp difference in the rDNA-ITS and LSU genes, and 2 bp differences in the RPB1 gene; thus, these three genes are ineffective for distinguishing the three species. These three species have 5 bp differences in ACT, 14 bp differences in RPB2, 19 bp differences in TEF and 4 bp differences in TUB. T. mulanensis and T. fusongensis have 3 bp differences in RPB2, 5 bp differences in TEF and 4 bp differences in TUB. Phylogenetic analysis combining the RPB2, TEF and TUB genes is most effective at distinguishing T. mulanensis and T. fusongensis. T. mulanensis and T. fusongensis were clustered on a branch with a close genetic relationship and may form a complex group. However, due to their distinct morphological characteristics of conidia size and number of septa, they were considered two novel species.

TABLE 5

SpeciesPosition (bp)
rDNA-ITSACTLSURPB1RPB2
14112232263343433637040091213202126272829303157687699
T. mulanensisCTTCCCGGACAGCCCATCGTG
T. fusongensisCTTCTTGGGCAGCCCATAGCG
T. jixiensisTCCTCCAACATCCAGATCCATCT

SpeciesPosition (bp)
TEFTUB
2352721341641671751953724034114164194234244485587888335960300318

T. mulanensisCACGGCACTACATCTCGTGT
T. fusongensisTAGAGGCATCACATCCCACCC
T. jixiensisTTCAAATTGTCCCTTTGTGT

Nucleotide differences in the partial gene sequences of rDNA-ITS, ACT, LSU, RPB1, RPB2, TEF, and TUB for T. mulanensis, T. fusongensis and T. jixiensis.

Position refers to the nucleotide position in each sequence of rDNA-ITS, ACT, LSU, RPB1, RPB2, TEF and TUB of type isolates.

Brief Introduction to the Morphological Characteristics of Ilyonectria Species

Morphological characteristics also support the classification of phylogenetic trees. The morphological characteristics of I. robusta, I. communis, I. mors-panacis, I. pseudodestructans, I. changbaiensis, I. qitaiheensis, N. obtusispora, D. torresensis and R. panacis were consistent with previously reported strains. Four novel species were confirmed by phylogeny and are described as follows.

Thelonectria ginsengicola Y. M. Guan & Y. Li, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB836525 (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5

Etymology: Named after the host Panax ginseng. “Ginsengicola” means “born on ginseng.”

Type: China, Jilin Province, Changbai City, county of Fusong, on roots of Panax ginseng, Oct 2018, Y. Guan. (CGMCC3.20154 = R9 - holotype).

Description:Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiophores were simple or complex with 2-3 branches, monophialides. Mycelial cells were thick-walled and septate. Hyphae hyaline to yellow. Chlamydospores were borne apically or intermittently in hyphae and were more commonly single or in pairs. Macroconidia were the majority, with 1-5 septa; most had 3-4 septa. The shape was a sickle-shaped curve; the base foot was blunt and became gradually thicker toward the top, and the top was also blunt. The size was (38.4) 44.3 (57.7) μm × (4.8) 5.7 (6.9) μm, and the length/width ratio was (5.9) 8.1 (10.3). Microconidia were elliptical, stick or sickle-shaped curves with an irregular shape and 0-1 septa. The size of microconidia was (12.5) 9.69 (12.5) μm × (4.8) 4.1 (6.9) μm, and the length/width ratio was (1.4) 2.7 (3.7). The size of one septate microconidium was (19.5) 24.3 (29.3) μm × (4.1) 4.8 (6.5) μm, and its length/width ratio was (3.9) 5.5 (6.4).

Culture characteristics: On PDA, the color was initially white, later becoming dark yellow with a wavy margin; the reverse side was reddish brown. The colony grows outward in a wave shape. The mycelium grew vigorously, and it was difficult to produce conidia on PDA and SNA. After the addition of ginseng roots and continuous n-UV irradiation, pionnotes were produced on the mycelium or on the vertical wall of the petri dish. The growth of the colony formed concentric rings, and the growth was very slow. The size of the colony reached 22 mm in 10 days. On SNA, the colonies were sparse and white to transparent with regular margins and chlamydospores; macroconidia and microconidia were not observed.

Note:T. ginsengicola and T. truncata were grouped together on a branch. The greatest difference was the presence of microconidia and chlamydospores. Macroconidia were smaller than those of T. truncate (Salgado-Salazar et al., 2012).

Thelonectria jixiensis Y. M. Guan & Y. Li, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB 836520 (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6

Etymology: Named after the city of Jixi, Heilongjiang Province, China, where the strain type was collected.

Type: China, Heilongjiang Province, Jixi City, on roots of Panax ginseng, Oct 2018, Y. Guan. (CGMCC3.20156 = Q21-5 - holotype).

Description:Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiophores simple or complex, spiral branches, monophialides and straight macroconidia or slightly curved head. The body is widest at one-quarter of the head; the basal cells with tips are thinner and narrower, with 0-4 septa. Most had 2-3 septa, and very few had 0 or 4 septa; sizes were in the range of (27.3) 35.8 (41.7) μm × (5.5) 6.9 (8.9) μm, with a length/width ratio of (4.3) 5.1 (7.9). Microconidia were not observed. Chlamydospores were mostly borne apically on the mycelium, and solitary was more common.

Culture characteristics: On PDA, the colonies produced were white at the beginning with a sparsely floccose to fluffy aerial mycelium and vigorous growth. The hyphae at the margins of the colony were thin, and the center hyphae were denser. Light yellow color appeared occasionally on the reverse side over time. The colony grew slowly to a size of 38 mm in 10 days. On SNA, the colonies were sparse, with regular margins, and the mycelium obviously degenerated and gradually disappeared as the number of breeding generations increased. Chlamydospores and macroconidia were not observed on SNA.

Note: The phylogenetic tree shows that T. jixiensis is closely related to T. blackeriella. T. jixiensis produced simple or complex conidiophores with spiral branches, and its macroconidia were slightly larger. The simple conidiophores of T. blackeriella and the macroconidia were relatively small. The shapes of the macroconidia of the two are very easily distinguished, and neither species produces microconidia (Carlucci et al., 2017).

Thelonectria mulanensis Y. M. Guan & Y. Li, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB 836521 (Figure 7).

FIGURE 7

Etymology: Named after the County of Mulan, Heilongjiang Province, China, where the strain type was collected.

Type: China, Heilongjiang Province, Mulan County, on roots of Panax ginseng, Oct 2018, Y. Guan. (CGMCC3.20155 = Q20-8 - holotype).

Description:Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiophores simple or complex, with 2-3 branches, monophialides. The mycelial cells were thick-walled, transparent and septate. The chlamydospores were produced from the mycelium, and spores were intercalary or terminal and single, in pairs or multiple bunches. Macroconidia were the majority, with 3-7 septa, but most were 5 septa, and lengths ranged from (59.1) 76.5 (96.6) μm × (2.7) 8.3 (5.6) μm. Fungi were a sickle-shaped curve. The base foot was blunt and became gradually thicker toward the top, and the top was also blunt. The microconidia were elliptical, stick or sickle-shaped curved of an irregular shape with 0-1 septum, and lengths ranged from (4.6) 9.5 (18.3) μm × (2.7) 3.9 (5.6) μm. Microsclerotia were produced after more than 8 weeks.

Culture characteristics: On PDA, the colonies produced a white, cottony dense floccose to fluffy aerial mycelium. The margins of the colony were irregular, and the hyphae were sparse and radial. The reverse color was white to yellow. In PDA culture, colonies grew slowly and reached 25 mm in 10 days. On SNA, the colonies were sparse, white to transparent, with regular margins and chlamydospores; macroconidia and microconidia were not observed.

Note: This species is closely related to T. jixiensis, but it produces macroconidia and microconidia, and T. jixiensis has no microconidia. The macroconidia of T. mulanensis were twice the size of those of T. jixiensis, had more septa and were thinner. The conidiophores and chlamydospores of the two species are similar.

Thelonectria fusongensis Y. M. Guan & Y. Li, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB 836524 (Figure 8).

FIGURE 8

Etymology: Named after the county of Fusong, Changbai City, Jilin Province, China, where the strain type was collected.

Type: China, Jilin Province, Changbai City, county of Fusong, on roots of Panax ginseng, Oct 2018, Y. Guan. (CGMCC3.20153 = R1-8 - holotype).

Description:Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiophores were simple or complex, with 2-3 branches, monophialides. The mycelial cells were thick-walled, transparent, and septate. Chlamydospores were borne apically or intercalary in hyphae and were solitary or in pairs. Macroconidia were in the majority, with 1-5 septa, but most had 2-3 septa. The body was a sickle-shaped curve, and the base was blunt and thickened gradually toward the top. The top was also blunt, not sharp, with sizes in the range of (40.2) 52.3 (62.2) μm × (4.2) 5.9 (7.9) μm. Microconidia were in the minority and exhibited irregular elliptical, stick or curved sickle shapes and 0-1 septa, with sizes in the range of (7.4) 13.5 (23.3) μm × (2.9) 4.1 (6.1) μm.

Culture characteristics: On PDA, the colonies grew in a concentric wavy pattern and presented a velvety surface; they were initially white, then brownish yellow, and brownish red on the reverse side. The mycelium became increasingly sparse from the center to the edge. It was difficult to produce conidia on PDA and SNA. The addition of ginseng roots and continuous n-UV light cultivation caused the surface of the mycelium to produce yellow pionnotes at more than 8 weeks. The colonies reached 30 mm in diameter in 10 days. On SNA, the colonies were sparse, white to transparent, with regular margins and chlamydospores; macroconidia and microconidia were not observed.

Note: Phylogenetic inference revealed that T. fusongensis is closely related to T. mulanensis, but the microconidia of the former were larger than those of the latter, there were fewer septa, the microconidia were straighter, and the bending arc was smaller.

Pathogenicity Tests

For in vitro inoculation using spore suspension, evaluation after 7 days showed that all of the strains infected ginseng roots. The mycelium grew on the ginseng root, and the longitudinal portion of the ginseng root also showed infection. Reddish-brown areas formed on the shallow ginseng roots near the inoculation point. The control showed no symptoms (Figure 9).

FIGURE 9

For whole plant inoculation in the greenhouse, all of the strains used in the test caused rusty root rot. 2 months after inoculation with the spore suspension, the inoculated 3-year-old ginseng roots showed symptoms similar to rusty root rot and to natural disease in the field. Some ginseng roots were rust-colored, but no gully like symptoms formed (Figure 10). Ginseng roots inoculated with sterile water were asymptomatic. Recovery of the diseased samples and sequencing of all of the genes described above yielded results that were the same as those obtained for the isolates used in the inoculations, satisfying Koch’s postulates, and the identity of the species was determined. Ginseng roots inoculated with R. panacis showed a darker color with grayish-black symptoms.

FIGURE 10

Discussion

Ginseng rusty root rot is the root disease with the highest incidence in China’s main ginseng cultivation areas. The identities of the varieties of diseased ginseng samples collected in the experiments were not clear. Most of the currently grown Chinese cultivars are domesticated varieties, and Damaya ginseng is commercially cultivated. Therefore, the correlation between the presence of fungi on ginseng roots and ginseng variety was not analyzed. The identification and pathogenicity analysis of 766 isolates revealed that ginseng rusty root rot was caused by a complex of Ilyonectria, Ilyonectria-like, and Rhexocercosporidium fungi. The Ilyonectria-like fungi included three genera of Ilyonectria, Dactylonectria and Thelonectria, all of which belonged to Nectriaceae, except Rhexocercosporidium. I. robusta and I. communis were the dominant pathogens with the highest proportion of ginseng rusty root rot pathogens that were recovered from ginseng rusty rot roots.

Ginseng rusty root rot has been attributed to the Ilyonectria fungus in China and South Korea (Wang, 2001; Farh et al., 2018). The 766 isolates we isolated were divided into 14 species, of which R. panacis was the only pathogen other than Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like species previously reported to cause rusty root rot symptoms. I. robusta was the most widely isolated dominant pathogen; this is inconsistent with a previous report that 90% of Chinese ginseng rusty root rot is caused by I. radicicola/C. destructans (Wang, 2001). I. radicicola/C. destructans may be a huge complex group in terms of morphological similarity (Cabral et al., 2012a). The species found later in various plants were not closely related to the original strain type CBS 264.5 (I. destructans), and I./C. destructans has generally not been found to be as common as when it was first proposed and discovered.

Most of the Ilyonectria strains infecting ginseng were obtained from P. quinquefolius, and P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius differ significantly with respect to the proportions of pathogens present. I. crassa and I. panacis were isolated from P. quinquefolius in Canada (Cabral et al., 2012a). The sampling collections of the present study covered the main cultivated areas of Chinese ginseng, and I. panacis, I. rufa and I. crassa strains were not isolated. In contrast, the dominant pathogen I. robusta was once considered to exhibit low pathogenicity. The pathogenicity was not directly proportional to the separation ratio. I. robusta isolated from P. quinquefolium was first described by Hildebrand as Ramularia robusta (Hildebrand, 1935). I. robusta was first reported in 2014 to cause ginseng root disease in China (Lu et al., 2014). Sixty-eight strains were derived from many hosts. Twenty-one of the isolates obtained from ginseng plants were segregated phylogenetically into four different groups, each of which was considered a different species of Ilyonectria: I. mors-panacis, I. robusta, I. panacis, and I. crassa (Seifert et al., 2003; Cabral et al., 2012a). These strains were grouped according to the strength of their pathogenicity; the weakly aggressive strains also originated from other hosts, but the highly aggressive strains were derived from a specific host ginseng (Cabral et al., 2012a). I. mors-panacis is not limited to infecting ginseng (Mi et al., 2017). I. robusta is considered a weakly aggressive strain based on the phylogenetic analysis and on I. robusta’s and I. crassa’s host and other factors. It is speculated that American and Korean ginseng are not susceptible to I. robusta or I. crassa (Cabral et al., 2012a), and the present article confirmed that I. robusta was the dominant pathogen with the highest isolation ratio. The prevention and control of rusty root rot in cultivation should be dominated by attention to I. rubosta.

Ginseng red-skin root is a non-infectious disease that differs from ginseng rusty root rot in China. Lu et al. reported that ginseng red-skin root is caused by a complex group of Fusarium, Ilyonectria and Dactylonectria and that Ilyonectria fungi were the dominant pathogens. I. communis, I. changbaiensis and I. qitaiheensis were newly reported species, but the same species were obtained in the present study. The types of pathogenic populations obtained in the present research are similar to the previously identified pathogens. Red-skin root and rusty root rot may not be separated. These conditions are primarily caused by Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like fungi, and they may represent different infection stages or may be caused by different species of Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like fungi (Lu et al., 2020). However, this hypothesis must be clarified. The uniform name “rusty root rot” is more acceptable because most of the infected ginseng roots have dry rot that is similar to the symptoms of decayed wood, not merely red skin; it is possible that the pathogens that cause rusty root rot also cause red-skin root and that red-skin roots are only in the early stages of the disease. I. communis and I. robusta were also the two pathogens present in the highest proportions in red-skin root isolates. Differences in pathogenicity may be the most widely accepted cause of the different symptoms, but if the disease is inferred based only on the apparent form of the agents infecting the ginseng root, the diagnosis will not be acceptable. The lifestyle of each microorganism is different, and different effects may not result from differences in pathogenicity. Fusarium was not reported as a pathogen that causes dry rot symptoms alone. Fusarium may infect the roots of ginseng via multi-infection in tissues infected by primary intruders that are not the direct cause of rusty root rot or red-skin root (Guan et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016).

I. mors-panacis was discovered on P. quinquefolium by Hildebrand (1935), who described it as “R. mors-panacis” (Hypocreales, 1935). This species was also found in Japan on P. ginseng, and it was collected as “C. destructans” f. sp. Panacis (ex-type CBS 124662) is treated as a synonym. This species is considered a strong, aggressive species in Ilyonectria, but the isolation ratio was only 10.9%. Sufficient time to complete the infection is necessary for the chronic pathogenic Ilyonectria population to cause damage to the roots of perennials (Guan et al., 2020). Of course, the relationship between the degree of epidemic disease and pathogenicity was not studied in depth, and this relationship is determined by many factors. Although I. communis is a new species that was only recently reported (Lu et al., 2020), it is one of the dominant pathogens that cause ginseng rusty root rot. I. robusta and I. communis should be the main targets for controlling ginseng rusty root rot in cultivation.

The four novel species of Thelonectria were identified based on the conclusion that closely related species were being compared. Multi-locus studies are feasible and effective for the identification of novel species. None of the individual genes studied completely matched the same gene in another species, and the combined phylogenetic analysis of multiple gene sequences may result in a suitable classification. Among the studied genes, SSU contributed very little to the strains listed in the present article, but its role cannot be ignored in Thelonectria (Salgado-Salazar et al., 2016). ACT and RPB2 provided the most information, and analysis of these genes could fully resolve all of the strains described in this article. Comparison of the RPB2, TEF and TUB genes is the most effective way to distinguish T. mulanensis from T. fusongensis. The use of all of the gene sequences studied in this work makes the phylogenetic tree more credible. For Ilyonectria, rDNA-ITS was not a good marker for distinguishing strains such as I. rufa and I. robusta, and the HIS3 gene may be used alone to initially distinguish species of Ilyonectria (Cabral et al., 2012b).

Many novel Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like species have been discovered recently (Carlucci et al., 2017; Lawrence et al., 2019). Due to the slow growth of some fungi, it is not easy to obtain species using separation techniques. Novel species of Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like fungi that infect the roots of ginseng will continue to be discovered in soil. Thelonectria fungi have saprophytic properties or weak pathogenicity, and their host specificity has not been determined. Evaluation after inoculation also showed that Thelonectria fungi had weak pathogenicity, and these fungi may also be opportunistically pathogenic, similar to Ilyonectria-like fungi.

The present research revealed pathogens that cause ginseng rusty root rot but have remained unknown for many years. These results, which were obtained using a multi-locus combined approach, update previous conclusions and identify the species that should be targeted for the prevention and control of rusty root rot in ginseng cultivation. However, due to the continuous cropping properties of ginseng and continuous land use changes, Ilyonectria and Ilyonectria-like pathogens are soil-borne diseases, and the population structure may also change.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, MT678559 etc.

Author contributions

YG conceived and designed the study and wrote the manuscript. YG, YM, and QJ performed the experiments. QW, NL, and YF analyzed the sequences. YZ and YL reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key project at the central government level: The Establishment of Sustainable Use for Valuable Chinese Medicine Resources (2060302), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (CAAS-XTCX20190025-6), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-21), Central the Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (Nos. 1610342016010 and 1610342020004), the Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Jilin Province (20191001021XH), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81903755 and 31501828).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    BaranovA. (1966). Recent advances in our knowledge of the morphology, cultivation and uses of ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer).Econ. Bot.20403406. 10.1007/BF02904062

  • 2

    BoothC. (1966). The genus Cylindrocarpon.Mycol. Papers104156. 10.1007/978-3-319-23534-9_1

  • 3

    CabralA.GroenewaldJ. Z.RegoC.OliveiraH.CrousP. W. (2012a). Cylindrocarpon root rot: multi-gene analysis reveals novel species within the Ilyonectria radicicola species complex.Mycol. Res.11655688. 10.1007/s11557-011-0777-7

  • 4

    CabralA.RegoC.NascimentoT.OliveiraH.GroenewaldJ. Z.PedroW.et al (2012b). Multi-gene analysis and morphology reveal novel Ilyonectria species associated with black foot disease of grapevines.Fungal. Biol.1166280. 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.09.010

  • 5

    CarboneI.KohnL. (1999). A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes.Mycologia91553556. 10.2307/3761358

  • 6

    CarlucciA.LopsF.MostertL.HalleenF.RaimondoM. L. (2017). Occurrence fungi causing black foot on young grapevines and nursery rootstock plants in Italy.Phytopathol. Mediterr.561039. 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-18769

  • 7

    CastleburyL. A.RossmanA. Y.HytenA. S. (2006). Phylogenetic relationships of Neonectria/Cylindrocarpon on Fagus in North America.Can. J. Bot.8414171433. 10.1139/b06-105

  • 8

    CastleburyL. A.RossmanA. Y.SungG. H.JosephA. S.SpataforaW. (2004). Multigene phylogeny reveals new lineage for Stachybotrys chartarum, the indoor air fungus.Mycol. Res.108864872. 10.1017/S0953756204000607

  • 9

    ChaverriP.SalgadoC.HirookaY.RossmanA. Y.SamuelsG. L. (2011). Delimitation of Neonectria and Cylindrocarpon (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales, Ascomycota) and related genera with Cylindrocarpon-like anamorphs.Stud. Mycol.685778. 10.3114/sim.2011.68.03

  • 10

    ChoD. H.ParkK. J.YuY. H.OhhS. H.LeeH. S. (1995). Root-rot development of 2-year old ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) caused by Cylindrocarpon destructans (Zinssm.) Scholten in the continuous cultivation field.J. Ginseng. Res.19175180.

  • 11

    ChungH. S. (1979). Ginseng Disease. Research Reports of the Korean Society of Plant Protection.Seoul: Korean Society of Plant Protection.

  • 12

    CrousP. W.GroenewaldJ. Z.RisedeJ.HyweljonesN. (2004). Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: species with sphaeropedunculate vesicles.Stud. Mycol.50415429. 10.1023/B:MYCO.0000012225.79969.29

  • 13

    de HoogG. S.van den EndeA. H. G. G. (1998). Molecular diagnostics of clinical strains of filamentous Basidiomycetes.Mycoses41183189. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1998.tb00321.x

  • 14

    DomschK. H.GamsW.AndersonT. H. (2007). Compendium of Soil Fungi, 2nd Edn. Eching: IHW-Verlag.

  • 15

    FarhE. A.KimY. J.KimY. J.YangD. C. (2018). Cylindrocarpon destructans/Ilyonectria radicicola-species complex: causative agent of ginseng root-rot disease and rusty symptoms.J. Ginseng. Res.42915. 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.01.004

  • 16

    GaoJ.WangY.GuanY. M.ChenC. Q. (2014). Fusarium cerealis, a new pathogen causing ginseng (Panax ginseng) root rot in China.Plant Dis.98:1433. 10.1094/PDIS-03-14-0328-PDN

  • 17

    GargasA.TaylorJ. (1992). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for amplifying and sequencing 18S rDNA from lichenized fungi.Mycologia84589592. 10.1080/00275514.1992.12026182

  • 18

    GroenewaldJ. Z.NakashimaC.NishikawaJ.ShinH. D.ParkJ. H.JamaA. N.et al (2013). Species concepts in Cercospora: spotting the weed among the roses.Stud. Mycol.75115170. 10.3114/sim0012

  • 19

    GuanY. M.ChenM. L.MaY.DuZ.YuanN.LiY.et al (2020). Whole-genome and time-course dual RNA-Seq analyses reveal chronic pathogenicity-related gene dynamics in the ginseng rusty root rot pathogen Ilyonectria robusta.Sci. Rep.10:1586. 10.1038/s41598-020-58342-7

  • 20

    GuanY. M.DengJ. C.MaY. Y.LiY.ZhangY. Y. (2019). Seed-associated fungal diversity and the molecular identification of Fusarium with potential threat to ginseng (Panax ginseng) in China.Plant Dis.104330339. 10.1094/PDIS-09-19-1817-RE

  • 21

    GuanY. M.LuB. H.WangY.GaoJ.WuL. J. (2014). First report of root rot caused by Fusarium redolens on ginseng (Panax ginseng) in Jilin province of China.Plant Dis.98:844. 10.1094/PDIS-09-13-0922-PDN

  • 22

    HalleenF.FourieP. H.CrousP. W. (2006a). A review of black-foot disease of grapevines.Phytopathol. Mediterr.45S55S67. 10.1520/STP37480S

  • 23

    HalleenF.SchroersH. J.GroenewaldJ. Z.RegoC.OliveiraH.CrousP. W. (2006b). Neonectria liriodendri sp. nov., the main causal agent of black foot disease of grapevines.Stud. Mycol.55227234. 10.3114/sim.55.1.227

  • 24

    HalleenF.SchroersH. J.GroenewaldJ. Z.CrousP. W. (2004). Novel species of Cylindrocarpon (Neonectria) and Campylocarpon gen. nov. associated with black foot disease.Stud. Mycol.50431445. 10.1023/B:MYCO.0000012225.7996.29

  • 25

    HildebrandA. (1935). Root rot of ginseng in Ontario caused by members of the genus Ramularia.Can. J. Res.1282114. 10.1139/cjr35-007

  • 26

    HirookaY.KobayashiT.NatsuakiK. T. (2005). Neonectria castaneicola and Neo. rugulosa in Japan.Mycologia9710581066. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832755

  • 27

    HuS. Y. (1977). A contribution to our knowledge of ginseng.Am. J. Chinese Med.5123. 10.1142/S0192415X77000026

  • 28

    LawrenceD. P.NouriM. T.TrouillasF. P. (2019). Taxonomy and multi-locus phylogeny of cylindrocarpon-like species associated with diseased roots of grapevine and other fruit and nut crops in California.Fungal Syst. Evol.45975. 10.3114/fuse.2019.04.06

  • 29

    LiuY. J.WhelenS.HallB. D. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit.Mol. Biol. Evol.1617991808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092

  • 30

    LuX. H.JiaoX. L.ChenA. J.LuoY.GaoW. W. (2014). First report of Ilyonectria robusta causing rusty root of Asian Ginseng in China.Plant Dis.99:156. 10.1094/PDIS-06-14-0663-PDN

  • 31

    LuX. H.ZhangX. M.JiaoX. L.HaoJ. J.ZhangX. S.LuoY.et al (2020). Taxonomy of fungal complex causing red-skin root of Panax ginseng in China.J. Ginseng Res.44506518. 10.1016/j.jgr.2019.01.006

  • 32

    MantiriF. R.SamuelsG. J.RaheJ. E.HondaB. M. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships in Neonectria species having Cylindrocarpon anamorphs inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences.Can. J. Bot.79334340. 10.1139/b01-002

  • 33

    MiC.YangR.RaoJ.YangS.WeiF.LiO.et al (2017). Unveiling of dominant fungal pathogens associated with rusty root rot of Panax notoginseng based on multiple methods.Plant Dis.10120462052. 10.1094/PDIS-01-17-0135-RE

  • 34

    MoncalvoJ. M.LutzoniF. M.RehnerS. A.JohnsonJ.VilgalysR. (2000). Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences.Syst. Biol.49278305. 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.278

  • 35

    O’DonnellK.CigelnikE. (1997). Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous.Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.7103116. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376

  • 36

    PunjaZ. K. (1997). Fungal pathogens of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium) in British Columbia.Can. J. Plant Pathol.19301306. 10.1080/07060669709500528

  • 37

    ReelederR. D. (2007). Rhexocercosporidium panacis sp. nov. a new anamorphic species causing rusted root of ginseng (Panax quinquefolius).Mycologia999198. 10.1080/15572536.2007.11832604

  • 38

    ReelederR. D.HokeS. M. T.ZhangY. (2006). Rusted root of ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) is caused by a species of Rhexocercosporidium.Phytopathology96:1243. 10.1094/PHYTO-96-1243

  • 39

    Salgado-SalazarC.RossmanA. Y.ChaverriP. (2013). Not as ubiquitous as we thought: taxonomic crypsis, hidden diversity and cryptic speciation in the cosmopolitan fungus Thelonectria discophora (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales, Ascomycota).PLoS One8:e76737. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076737

  • 40

    Salgado-SalazarC.RossmanA. Y.ChaverriP. (2016). The genus Thelonectria (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales, Ascomycota) and closely related species with Cylindrocarpon-like asexual states.Fungal Divers80411455. 10.1007/s13225-016-0365-x

  • 41

    Salgado-SalazarC.RossmanA. Y.SamuelsG. J.CapdetM.ChaverriP. (2012). Multigene phylogenetic analyses of the Thelonectria coronata and T. veuillotiana species complexes.Mycologia10413251350. 10.3852/12-055

  • 42

    Salgado-SalazarC.RossmanA. Y.SamuelsG. J.HirookaY.SanchezR. M.ChaverriP. (2015). Phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Thelonectria discophora (Ascomycota, Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) species complex.Fungal Divers.70129. 10.1007/s13225-014-0280-y

  • 43

    SamuelsG. J.BrayfordD. (1990). Variation in Nectria radicicola and its anamorph, Cylindrocarpon destructans.Mycol. Res.94433442. 10.1016/S0953-7562(10)80001-2

  • 44

    ScholtenG. (1964). Nectria radicicola en Thielaviopsis basicola als parasieten van Cyclamen persicum.Neth. J. Plant Pathol.70168. 10.1007/BF02001771

  • 45

    SchroersH. J.ŽerjavM.MundaA.HalleenF.CrousP. W. (2007). Cylindrocarpon pauciseptatum sp. nov. with notes on Cylindrocarpon species with wide, predominantly 3-septate macroconidia.Mycol. Res.1128292. 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.10.004

  • 46

    SeifertK. A.McMullenC. R.YeeD.ReelederR. D.DobinsonK. F. (2003). Molecular differentiation and detection of ginseng-adapted isolates of the root rot fungus Cylindrocarpon destructans.Phytopathology9315331542. 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.12.1533

  • 47

    TewoldemedhinY. T.MazzolaM.MostertL.McLeodA. (2011). Cylindrocarpon species associated with apple tree roots in South Africa and their quantification using real-time PCR.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.129637651. 10.1007/s10658-010-9728-4

  • 48

    VilgalysR.HesterM. (1990). Rapid genetic identification, and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.J. Bacteriol.17242384246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246

  • 49

    WangT. S. (2001). China Ginseng.Liaoning: Science and Technology Press.

  • 50

    WangY.GuanY. M.LuB. H.GaoJ. (2016). First report of ginseng (Panax ginseng) root rot caused by Fusarium acuminatum in China.Plant Dis.100:525. 10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0273-PDN

  • 51

    ZhouY.YangZ.GaoL.LiuW.LiuR.ZhaoJ.et al (2017). Changes in element accumulation, phenolic metabolism, and antioxidative enzyme activities in the red-skin roots of Panax ginseng.J. Ginseng Res.41307315. 10.1016/j.jgr.2016.06.001

  • 52

    ZinnsmeisterC. L. (1918). Ramularia root-rots of ginseng.Phytopathology8557571.

Summary

Keywords

Dactylonectria, Ilyonectria, Ilyonectria-like, Neonectria, Panax ginseng, Rhexocercosporidium, rusty root rot, Thelonectria

Citation

Guan YM, Ma YY, Jin Q, Wang QX, Liu N, Fu YP, Zhang YY and Li Y (2020) Multi-Locus Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Fungal Complex Associated With Rusty Root Rot of Panax ginseng in China. Front. Microbiol. 11:618942. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.618942

Received

20 October 2020

Accepted

26 November 2020

Published

16 December 2020

Volume

11 - 2020

Edited by

Eeva Johanna Vainio, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Finland

Reviewed by

Julia Christine Meitz-Hopkins, Stellenbosch University, South Africa; Zheng Wang, Yale University, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yu Li,

This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics