Heterotrophic Foraminifera Capable of Inorganic Nitrogen Assimilation

Nitrogen availability often limits biological productivity in marine systems, where inorganic nitrogen, such as ammonium is assimilated into the food web by bacteria and photoautotrophic eukaryotes. Recently, ammonium assimilation was observed in kleptoplast-containing protists of the phylum foraminifera, possibly via the glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase (GS/GOGAT) assimilation pathway imported with the kleptoplasts. However, it is not known if the ubiquitous and diverse heterotrophic protists have an innate ability for ammonium assimilation. Using stable isotope incubations (¹⁵N-ammonium and ¹³C-bicarbonate) and combining transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with quantitative nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS) imaging, we investigated the uptake and assimilation of dissolved inorganic ammonium by two heterotrophic foraminifera; a non-kleptoplastic benthic species, Ammonia sp., and a planktonic species, Globigerina bulloides. These species are heterotrophic and not capable of photosynthesis. Accordingly, they did not assimilate ¹³C-bicarbonate. However, both species assimilated dissolved ¹⁵N-ammonium and incorporated it into organelles of direct importance for ontogenetic growth and development of the cell. These observations demonstrate that at least some heterotrophic protists have an innate cellular mechanism for inorganic ammonium assimilation, highlighting a newly discovered pathway for dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) assimilation within the marine microbial loop.

Introduction

The nitrogen (N) cycle is one of the most complex marine biogeochemical cycles, and N exerts significant influence on the cycles of many other elements, particularly carbon and phosphorous, because it is often among the elements that can limit biological productivity (Gruber, 2008). In today’s ocean, all the major reactions in the N-cycle are mediated by biology, whether they are assimilatory processes generating organic matter (nitrate/nitrite/ammonium assimilation, N₂-fixation), or dissimilatory processes generating energy (nitrification, denitrification, and anammox) (Gruber, 2008). Microalgae, cyanobacteria, bacteria, and archaea are the key drivers of N-cycle transformations. At the same time, pelagic and benthic consumers, including heterotrophic protists, contribute to the dissolved organic nitrogen pool through grazing, cell lysis and leakage, and to ammonification, transforming organic nitrogen to ammonium (Mulholland and Lomas, 2008; Kuypers et al., 2018).

Benthic foraminifera are heterotrophic protists that inhabit the marine sediments ranging from salt marshes and intertidal zones to the deep-sea trenches (Murray, 2006), and planktonic foraminifera occupy all open ocean surface waters, occasionally down to 4,000 m (Schiebel and Hemleben, 2017). Their diets vary, but include phytodetritus, bacteria, algae, phyto- and zooplankton, and nematodes (Moodley et al., 2000; Pascal et al., 2008; Dupuy et al., 2010; Enge et al., 2016; Bird et al., 2017, 2018; Chronopoulou et al., 2019). In addition, some species are mixotrophic (Mitra et al., 2016); they house algal symbionts (Gastrich, 1987; Spero, 1987) or kleptoplasts (Jauffrais et al., 2018) that provide fixed carbon to the host whilst also maintaining a heterotrophic mode of feeding (Jauffrais et al., 2016; LeKieffre et al., 2018b).

Foraminifera are highly significant global calcifiers, buffering ocean carbonate chemistry and contributing up to 60% of the total deep-marine calcite budget (Schiebel, 2002; Schiebel et al., 2007). The geochemistry of their fossilized shells is used as a proxy to reconstruct past seawater temperature, pH and other environmental parameters that provide essential constraints for refining climate change projections (Katz et al., 2010). In addition, N-isotopic ratios of the intra-shell proteins are a potential proxy for the supply of nitrate in oligotrophic environments over time (Smart et al., 2018). The last 15 years however, has seen an increase in biological studies revealing that that foraminifera are significant mediators in the N-cycle. Many species can take up and store large intracellular pools of nitrate (Piña-Ochoa et al., 2010) to perform complete denitrification (Risgaard-Petersen et al., 2006; Woehle et al., 2018). Estimates of their contribution to denitrification in marine sediments range from 8% to over 90% (Høgslund et al., 2008; Piña-Ochoa et al., 2010) and hence these abundant ubiquitous microorganisms are of high significance to the global nitrogen budget (Glock et al., 2013). In fact, some benthic foraminiferal species, from the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone, are not just facultative anaerobes switching to nitrate respiration when oxygen is depleted, denitrification is their preferred respiratory pathway (Glock et al., 2019).

In contrast to the ability of some benthic foraminifera to store nitrate for dissimilatory purposes, two kleptoplastic benthic foraminifera (the intertidal Haynesina germanica and the subtidal aphotic zone dweller Non-ionellina labradorica) assimilate ammonium into their cells (LeKieffre et al., 2018b; Jauffrais et al., 2019). However, in these two studies it could not be verified whether the ammonium assimilation took place through a kleptoplastic pathway (GS/GOGAT enzymatic pathway), or through a foraminiferal pathway; either via a putative mitochondrial glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) pathway or an alternative GS/GOGAT pathway (van Heeswijk et al., 2013; LeKieffre et al., 2018b; Jauffrais et al., 2019). Thus, the question remains as to whether heterotrophic protists can assimilate ammonium themselves.

Here we demonstrate the ability of two species of heterotrophic foraminifera, the benthic Ammonia sp., and the planktonic Globigerina bulloides, to take up and assimilate ammonium for cell growth. The genus Ammonia is ubiquitous in the sediments of intertidal zones of tropical to temperate waters (Murray, 2006). Ammonia sp. can ingest full diatoms into its cytoplasm, and observations of chloroplasts and diatoms in degradation have been reported (LeKieffre et al., 2017). However, Ammonia sp. is not able to maintain ingested diatom chloroplasts for more than 24 h and is not a kleptoplastic species (Jauffrais et al., 2016). G. bulloides is planktonic and barren of algal symbionts, and is often used in experiments for comparison with symbiont-harboring planktonic species (e.g., Hönisch et al., 2003). Its lack of symbionts also simplifies interpretation of downcore geochemical records based on fossil tests. This species is found across subpolar, temperate and subtropical oceans, and lower latitude upwelling regions (Darling and Wade, 2008), where it frequently dominates the flux of foraminiferal shells to the sea floor. G. bulloides has therefore become of considerable importance for palaeoclimate reconstructions (Kleijne et al., 1989; Sautter and Thunell, 1991; Naidu and Malmgren, 1996; Spero and Lea, 1996).

We investigated the uptake of two isotopically labeled micronutrients, ¹³C-bicarbonate (NaH¹³CO₃) and ¹⁵N-ammonium (¹⁵NH₄Cl), the former to confirm the heterotrophic nature of the investigated specimens, and the latter to investigate the potential for heterotrophic eukaryotic cell uptake of inorganic N.

Materials and Methods

Benthic Sampling and Incubation With H¹³CO₃^–, and ¹⁵NH₄⁺

Ammonia sp. specimens were taken from an intertidal mudflat in Fiskebäckskil Harbor, Gullmar Fjord, Skagerrak (West coast of Sweden; 58.24 N, 11.46 E). Previous sampling indicates that the Ammonia genotype present in this location is Ammonia T6 (Holzmann and Pawlowski, 2000). Therefore, it is probable that the Ammonia sp. specimens collected for this study are also T6, but since multiple genotypes can exist in a single location (e.g., Bird et al., 2020) and genotyping cannot be carried out on samples for TEM analysis we have elected to call our specimens Ammonia sp.

Living foraminifera were collected in May 2016, at low tide. Only the top 5 mm of the sediment were sampled and immediately transported in the dark to the laboratory. The incubation was carried out at the Kristineberg Marine Research Station, University of Gothenburg (Sweden) the day after collection. In the laboratory, the sediment was sieved on a 200 μm mesh with natural surface seawater directly pumped from the fjord. Only the fraction >200 μm was used. Living individuals of Ammonia sp. were selected under a binocular microscope based on cytoplasm color (yellow-brownish material spread through all but the last chamber of the specimen) the day before the experiment and left overnight at 10°C in a Petri-dish filled with artificial seawater to allow them to digest any plastid from algal prey that could interfere with the experiment (Jauffrais et al., 2016). The sampling information for each specimen is described in Supplementary Table S1.

The next day the cytoplasm was checked again, and 10 living specimens were selected and placed into 2 new plastic Petri-dishes (5 specimens per Petri dish) for the experiment. One Petri dish was filled with artificial seawater (ASW, Red Sea Salt, salinity = 34) spiked with 2 mM NaH¹³CO₃ and 10 μM ¹⁵NH₄Cl (Cambridge isotope Inc., Tewksbury MA, United States). The other Petri dish was filled with un-spiked ASW (Red Sea Salt, salinity = 34). The specimens incubated with un-spiked ASW were used as controls for NanoSIMS analysis; see below. The incubation was carried out in a cold room at 10°C with a light source set at 90 μmol photon m^–2 s^–1 to mimic their natural environment. After 20 h of incubation with constant light, the foraminifera were immediately chemically fixed by transferring them individually to 0.5 mL microtubes filled with fixative solution for onward TEM-NanoSIMS studies.

Planktonic Sampling and Incubation With H¹³CO₃^– and ¹⁵NH₄⁺

Plankton specimens were collected approximately 1–2 km from Santa Catalina Island, Southern California Bight (33.473 N, 118.485 W). The oceanographic setting near Santa Catalina is fully described by Bird et al. (2017). The seasonal variation in foraminiferal abundances and species composition is well-documented (Thunell and Sautter, 1992; Field, 2004). Specimens for this study were collected in Aug/Sept 2015, during a very strong El Niño event that followed a period of prolonged high sea surface temperature over the preceding 2 years (Bond et al., 2015). This caused an unusual foraminiferal assemblage, more typical of tropical, oligotrophic waters, resulting in low numbers of the ordinarily abundant symbiont barren heterotrophic species, G. bulloides. Therefore, a second species of planktonic foraminifera (Orbulina universa), was collected at the same time and location as G. bulloides. This second species was used as an isotopically normal control for NanoSIMS analysis (Supplementary Table S1). δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N natural isotopic bulk biomass values of the species G. bulloides and O. universa sampled were measured from the same location by Uhle et al. (1997). These values were shown to vary within 5 per mil difference from one species to another, which is below the measured variations of our control values (±2σ) (Supplementary Table S2). Indeed, NanoSIMS imaging, while resolving a great spatial resolution, does not allow the resolution of natural isotopic variations.

Samples were collected by scuba diving or net tows. Tow material was transferred to a container filled with ambient surface seawater and kept chilled during transit to shore at the Wrigley Marine Science Centre, where live foraminifera were wet picked. Using binocular light microscopy, individual G. bulloides and O. universa specimens were identified to the morphospecies level and transferred to 0.2 μm filter-sterilized seawater (FSW) in 20 ml culture jars and for recovery over 2 days. Culture jars were kept in a seawater bath at the ambient temperature of the surface waters throughout the recovery and experiment. Recovery was measured by the regeneration of spines and active feeding by the specimen on pre-frozen Artemis nauplii. Only recovered individuals were used in the experiment. The sampling information for each specimen is described in Supplementary Table S1.

For heavy isotope exposure, recovered specimens were gently transferred with a wide glass pipette into new individual 20 ml glass culture jars, filled completely with 0.2 μm FSW spiked with 2 mM NaH¹³CO₃ and 10 μM ¹⁵NH₄Cl (Cambridge Isotopes Inc.). The capped vials were immersed in a water bath held at 22°C under artificial light (Sylvania F24T12 Cool White fluorescent lights). Control specimens (O. universa) were treated in the same way without exposure to the heavy isotope spike. G. bulloides specimens were incubated with the spike for 6 h (n = 2) or 18 h (n = 2) before fixing for TEM. Specimens were chemically fixed by transferring individuals immediately to microtubes filled with fixative solution for onward TEM-NanoSIMS studies.

Preparation for TEM-NanoSIMS Studies

Specimens were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde diluted in cacodylate (NaCaco) buffer (0.1 M NaCaco, 0.4 M sucrose, and 0.1 M NaCl, pH = 7.4; Ammonia sp.) or in 0.8 μm FSW (G. bulloides, O. universa) at room temperature for 24 h. Fixed cells were stored at 4°C until further processing. The chemically fixed Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides specimens were decalcified, embedded in resin and sectioned for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations as described by LeKieffre et al. (2018a, c). Thin-sections were imaged with a transmission electron microscope, either a Philips 301 CM100 at the Electron Microscopy Facility of the University of Lausanne (Switzerland) or a JEOL JEM-1400 Plus TEM at the Electron Microscopy Facility of the University of Edinburgh (United Kingdom). The integrity of the mitochondria and the membranes of all specimens were checked by TEM observations to ensure the vitality of the studied specimens.

Stable Isotope Mapping With NanoSIMS

NanoSIMS analytical procedures followed those described by LeKieffre et al. (2018b, c). Areas of interest for NanoSIMS imaging were selected from TEM images. NanoSIMS imaging was carried out on a Cameca 50L NanoSIMS ion microprobe. Images were obtained by bombarding thin sections with a beam of Cs + focused to a spot size of ∼120 nm (beam current ∼2 pA) and counting ¹²C¹²C^–, ¹³C¹²C^–-, ¹²C¹⁴N^–, and ¹²C¹⁵N^– (see Supplementary Figure S1), in electron multipliers at a mass resolution of about 8,000, enough to resolve potential interferences in the mass spectrum. Each NanoSIMS image consisted of six to eight sequential images that were drift corrected and accumulated using the software L’IMAGE (developed by Dr. Larry Nittler, Carnegie Institution of Washington, United States). The quantified ¹³C/¹²C and ¹⁵N/¹⁴N ratios were obtained by the ratio of ¹²C¹³C^– with ¹²C¹²C^– and of ¹²C¹⁵N^– with ¹²C¹⁴N^–, respectively, as follows:

${\mathrm{\delta }}^{13}C(\%)=(\left({\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{mes}}\mathrm{/}{\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{nat}}\right)-1)\times {10}^3$

${\mathrm{\delta }}^{15}N(\%)=(\left({\mathit{N}}_{\mathit{mes}}\mathrm{/}{\mathit{N}}_{\mathit{nat}}\right)-1)\times {10}^3$

where C_mes and N_mes are the ¹³C¹²C/¹²C₂ and ¹²C¹⁵N/¹²C ¹⁴N ratios measured in the samples and C_nat and N_nat are the same ratios measured in an isotopically normal control sample (i.e., the Ammonia sp. and O. universa controls).

For G. bulloides and Ammonia sp. regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn with the software L’IMAGE to quantify mean ¹⁵N enrichments and standard deviations of different sub-cellular structures of a given foraminifera (Supplementary Table S2). Note that TEM-NanoSIMS sample preparation leads to the loss of all soluble compounds. Therefore, only ¹³C and ¹⁵N assimilated in the biomass can be measured (Nomaki et al., 2018; Gibbin et al., 2020; Loussert-Fonta et al., 2020). T-tests were performed to verify whether there was a significant difference in the δ¹⁵N and δ¹³C of different cellular compartments of Ammonia sp. (cytoplasm, electron opaque bodies and nucleoli) compared with the cytoplasm control values (Supplementary Table S2).

Results

TEM Observations

The cytoplasm of Ammonia sp. exhibited typical organelles observed in other benthic species (LeKieffre et al., 2018a): lipid droplets, organic lining, residual bodies (circular vacuoles with a diameter of about 2–5 μm, containing heterogeneous material), electron-opaque bodies (200–500 nm circular inclusions), fibrillar vesicles (oval vesicles of about 500 nm in length containing fibrils), mitochondria and “empty” vacuoles (from which the content has been lost during sample preparation) (Figure 1). In the G. bulloides cytoplasm, degradation vacuoles were relatively abundant and, similarly to Ammonia sp., several electron-opaque bodies, fibrillar vesicles (fv), and “empty” vacuoles were also seen (Figure 2). Fibrillar bodies (f) were observed in all observed G. bulloides; however, their appearance differed between the individuals incubated for 6 h from those incubated for 18 h (Figure 2). Fibrillar bodies (f) of specimens incubated for 6 h (Figure 2A) had a clearly distinct fibrillar content as in form B described in G. sacculifer (Anderson and Bé, 1976; Text Figure 1). On the other hand, the fibrils in the fibrillar bodies (f) observed in specimens incubated for 18 h (Figure 2B) had less distinct fibrillar material, as in form C described by Anderson and Bé (Anderson and Bé, 1976) as “highly dispersed fibrillar material.”

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. TEM micrographs of the cytoplasm of Ammonia sp. (A) Global view of the cytoplasm with numerous lipid droplets, vacuoles and a few residual bodies. (B) Higher magnification image of mitochondria, electron-opaque bodies, and fibrillar vesicles. (C) Detailed structure of a fibrillar vesicle, fibrils are organized in parallel. (D) Mitochondria with visible intact cristae and double membrane. eo, electron-opaque bodies; fv, fibrillar vesicles; li, lipid droplets; m, mitochondria; ol, organic lining; re, residual bodies; v, vacuoles.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. TEM micrographs of the cytoplasm of G. bulloides. Views of the cytoplasm in specimen incubated 6 h (A) and 18 h (B). (C) Detailed structure of fibrillar vesicle, electron-opaque bodies, and mitochondria. Black arrows: electron-opaque bodies (eo). dv, degradation vacuole; f, fibrillar bodies (form B, see text); f*, later stage of fibrillar bodies (form C); fv, fibrillar vesicles; m, mitochondria; v, vacuoles.

In one specimen per species, a nucleus was imaged with TEM and NanoSIMS. The ultrastructure of these nuclei were different from one species to another. In Ammonia sp. the nucleus exhibited a typical structure as described in previous studies (LeKieffre et al., 2018a), with a double membrane and several nucleoli scattered in the nucleoplasm (Figure 3). In G. bulloides, the nucleus had a double membrane, but no nucleolus in the imaged region, and exhibited a large portion of condensed chromatin (Figure 4; 6 h).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. ¹³C and ¹⁵N cellular localization in the cytoplasm of Ammonia sp. after 20 h of incubation in light with H¹³CO₃^– and ¹⁵NH₄⁺. Left column: TEM micrographs; central column: corresponding NanoSIMS δ¹⁵N map; right column: corresponding NanoSIMS δ¹³C map. Arrows: electron-opaque bodies; circles: fibrillar vesicles. dv, degradation vacuoles; li, lipid droplets; n, nucleoplasm; nu, nucleus.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. ¹³C and ¹⁵N cellular localization in the cytoplasm of G. bulloides after 6 and 18 h of incubation in light with H¹³CO₃^– and ¹⁵NH₄⁺. Left column: TEM micrographs; central column: corresponding NanoSIMS δ¹⁵N map; right column: corresponding NanoSIMS δ¹³C map. Arrows: electron-opaque bodies; arrowheads: prokaryote-like vesicles; circles: fibrillar vesicles. ch, condensed chromatin; dv, degradation vacuoles; f, fibrillar bodies (form B, see text); f*, later stage of fibrillar bodies (form C); li, lipid droplets; n, nucleoplasm; nu, nucleus; v, vacuoles.

No intact prokaryotic symbionts nor kleptoplasts could be seen in the cytoplasm of Ammonia sp. on the TEM micrographs (Figure 1). No intact algal or prokaryotic symbionts were observed in the G. bulloides specimens (Figure 2). However, some prokaryote-like vesicles were observed in the cytoplasm of two out of four of the G. bulloides incubated during this experiment (see arrowheads in Figure 4). These prokaryote-like vesicles had an oval/ovoid shape, with a length of ca. 500 nm and were always enclosed in degradation vacuoles and found in various states of degradation.

Inorganic Nitrogen and Carbon Assimilation

¹⁵N-enrichment was observed in all Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides specimens observed in this study. In contrast, no ¹³C-enrichment was observed in either species (Figures 3, 4). In Ammonia sp., after 20 h of incubation, NanoSIMS imaging revealed ¹⁵N-accumulation mainly in electron-opaque bodies (see arrows in Figure 3) with ¹⁵N-enrichment values ranging from ca. 2,500 to 6,000‰ (Figure 3) and fibrillar vesicles (ca. 2,000–4,000‰). The cytoplasm was also labeled with an average ¹⁵N-enrichment value of ca. 2,500‰, although with strong variability among specimens; two specimens exhibited cytoplasmic ¹⁵N-enrichment of between 3,200 and 3,400‰, while the third specimen only reached ca. 1,000‰. In one of the Ammonia sp. specimens, the nucleus was observed and imaged with the NanoSIMS (Figure 3). Its entire structure was ¹⁵N-labeled, with the nucleoli being slightly more ¹⁵N-enriched than the nucleoplasm (ca. 4,800‰ for the nucleoli, vs. ca. 4,600‰ for the nucleoplasm) (Figure 3).

The cytoplasm of all G. bulloides specimens incubated with ¹⁵NH₄⁺ for 6 and 18 h was ¹⁵N-enriched, increasing from an average of ca. 1,300‰ after 6 h to ca. 2,400‰ after 18 h (Figure 4). Like the Ammonia sp. specimens, the ¹⁵N-enrichment was variable from specimen to specimen, with cytoplasmic enrichment ranging from ca. 750 to 1,900‰ in individuals incubated for 6 h.

In contrast to Ammonia sp., the nucleoplasm of the nucleus imaged in one of the G. bulloides specimens (incubated for 6 h with ¹⁵NH₄⁺), was ¹⁵N-enriched to levels similar to the cytoplasm. However, ¹⁵N-enriched condensed chromatin (ca. 1,200‰, vs. ca. 750‰ for the cytoplasm) was observed (Figure 4). As in Ammonia sp., electron-opaque bodies and fibrillar vesicles accumulated ¹⁵N after 6 h of incubation (Figure 4, panel 3 and Supplementary Figure S2). The enrichment of these features was variable among specimens and over time: from ca. 4000‰ to ca. 11,500‰ for electron-opaque bodies, and ca. 1,000–2,000‰ for fibrillar vesicles (fv). Fibrillar bodies (f) (both forms B and C) were also ¹⁵N-labeled. A few other unidentified structures were also ¹⁵N-enriched, e.g., dense vesicles of 2–3 μm of diameter (Figure 4, panel 2). After 6 h, fibrillar body (form B) ¹⁵N-enrichment was variable, a few fibrillar bodies (f) with cytoplasmic enrichment values could be seen, however, the majority clearly accumulated more ¹⁵N-labeling than the cytoplasm with values ranging from ca. 1,200 to 4,000‰. After 18 h, all the fibrillar bodies (form C) had increased ¹⁵N-enrichment values of ca. 4,000–4,600‰, clearly above the cytoplasmic enrichment of ca. 2,400‰. A few unidentified structures observed in G. bulloides cytoplasm also accumulated ¹⁵N-labeling (e.g., Figure 4, panel 2). Finally, in two of the four G. bulloides specimens observed in this study, highly ¹⁵N-enriched hotspots (ca. 16,000–66,000‰) could be seen in the cytoplasm, some corresponding to prokaryote-like vesicles enclosed in degradation vacuoles (Figure 4, panels 1 and 4).

Discussion

Heterotrophy and Ammonium Assimilation

Previous observations of chloroplasts in the cytoplasm of Ammonia sp. (Jauffrais et al., 2018; Koho et al., 2018) were suggested to result from microalgal food ingestion and slow digestion, rather than active sequestration as their photosynthetic activity quickly decreased when not fed (Jauffrais et al., 2016). We did not observe intact chloroplasts in the specimens studied here, and our NanoSIMS data shows that no ¹³C-labeled carbon is present in the foraminiferal cell, thus confirming a lack of photosynthesis and the heterotrophic nature of Ammonia sp.

G. bulloides is well-known to be barren of algal symbionts, which was corroborated in the TEM images of our G. bulloides samples. Despite the report of Bird et al. (2017) highlighting the presence of Synechococcus endobionts, these were not observed in the specimens studied here. A lack of both algal symbionts and cyanobacterial endobionts indicates a heterotrophic mode of feeding in the G. bulloides specimens investigated in this study. The lack of observable ¹³C-enrichment in the cytoplasm of G. bulloides after 18 h exposure to H¹³CO₃ (Figure 4) supports this conclusion.

In contrast to the ¹³C incubation results, after incubation with ¹⁵N-ammonium, much of the Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides cytosol was enriched in ¹⁵N. Furthermore, two different structures were particularly enriched, the electron opaque bodies and fibrillar vesicles (Figures 3, 4). Both are common organelles in benthic foraminifera (LeKieffre et al., 2018a). Electron opaque bodies have been previously described in both benthic and planktonic foraminifera as electron-dense bodies or osmiophilic granules (Leutenegger, 1977; Nomaki et al., 2016; LeKieffre et al., 2018a). In H. germanica, an intertidal benthic foraminiferal species quite similar in morphology to Ammonia sp., the electron opaque bodies became enriched in ¹⁵N and ¹³C after incubation with ¹⁵NH₄Cl and H¹³CO₃ (LeKieffre et al., 2018b). In this study of Ammonia sp., these subcellular compartments became enriched in ¹⁵N but, as expected not in ¹³C (Figure 3). In addition, Nomaki et al. (2016) also demonstrated that in Ammonia sp. the electron opaque bodies are enriched in ³⁴S after incubation with Na₂³⁴SO₄ under dysoxic conditions (0.1–22 μmol l^–1 O₂). They suggested that electron opaque bodies play a role in N-assimilation in oxygen-depleted environments due to their ¹⁵N-enrichment under both dysoxic and anoxic conditions (compared to ³⁴S-enrichment only under dysoxic conditions). However, our study shows that the electron opaque bodies are also abundant and ¹⁵N-enriched under oxic conditions, indicating that their ¹⁵N-enrichment is not a function of oxygen concentration. Interestingly, the distribution of these electron opaque bodies may be a function of oxygen availability, as this differs between oxic conditions, where there is dispersal across the cell (this study, Koho et al., 2018) and anoxic conditions where they aggregate close to the cell periphery (Nomaki et al., 2016; Koho et al., 2018). However, the purpose of these electron-opaque bodies remains unclear.

Fibrillar vesicles (fv) are thought to be involved in the transport of sulfated amino-polysaccharides called glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (Langer, 1992). Thus, an enrichment in ¹⁵N is not surprising. GAGs are transported in vesicles to the cell membrane for formation into the organic lining or are secreted and are a significant component of the organic matrix template for calcium precipitation (Weiner and Erez, 1984; Langer, 1992), thereby playing a fundamental role in the growth of the foraminifera.

Of significance is the ¹⁵N-enrichment of nuclear material observed in both Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides. This nuclear material includes N-rich proteins and DNA and their enrichment in ¹⁵N indicate the assimilation of ammonium-derived N into the cell infrastructure. The fibrillar bodies (f) in planktonic species, which also became enriched in ¹⁵N, are proteinaceous organelles (Lee et al., 1965). Spero (1988) used TEM imaging to build the hypothesis that the fibrillar body proteins are involved in forming the organic matrix at the site of calcification, and hence are vital to the ontogenetic growth of the foraminifera. In our experiment, G. bulloides specimens were exposed to relatively high N concentrations (10 μM ¹⁵NH₄Cl) compared to the low ambient concentrations in surface waters, where Ammonia is rapidly recycled and consequently concentrations are often below detection levels (Mulholland and Lomas, 2008). In our experiment, the increased availability of ammonium to G. bulloides could have led to increased protein production and storage within the fibrillar bodies (f), resulting in their higher enrichment and the shift in appearance from form B at 6 h to form C at 18 h (cf. Figures 2A,B).

Our observations indicate that N-assimilation occurs in similar organelles in both planktonic and benthic species (except fibrillar bodies, absent from benthic foraminifera) that are crucial to foraminiferal growth and development.

Pathways of Ammonium Assimilation

The small number of prokaryote-like vesicles in the TEM images of two of the four G. bulloides specimens (including in additional TEM sections not processed through to NanoSIMS) were observed enclosed in degradation vacuoles and were in various states of degradation (Arrowheads, Figure 4). It is probable that they are bacterial prey (Bird et al., 2017) and could be a source of ¹⁵N-enrichment if exposed to ¹⁵N-ammonium prior to phagocytosis. A potential source of bacteria might have been the microenvironment formed around the spines of G. bulloides by its rhizopodial network, as bacteria could remain within this throughout the picking process. However, during the 2-day recovery phase in 0.2 μm filter-sterilized seawater (FSW), many of the microenvironment bacteria would have been phagocytosed and digested by the foraminifera prior to transfer to the experimental vial containing spiked 0.2 μm FSW. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to assume that some phagocytosis of ¹⁵N-enriched bacteria could occur. To understand the potential contribution of phagocytosed bacteria to ¹⁵N-enrichment of the foraminiferal cell, the same experimental procedures, but using ¹⁵N-NO₃ as the N-source, could be carried out. Planktic foraminifera are incapable of nitrate assimilation into their biomass (LeKieffre et al., 2020) and therefore any resulting ¹⁵N-enrichment in the foraminiferal cell must come from contaminating bacteria. LeKieffre et al. (2020) exposed O. universa to ¹⁵N-NO₃ following the same experimental procedures used here. Their results showed prokaryote-like vesicles in degradation vacuoles highly enriched in ¹⁵NO₃, whilst the cytoplasm and organelles of the foraminiferal cell, by contrast, exhibited extremely low ¹⁵N-labeling, within the range of the control values after 6 h of incubation, and barely above the control values after 18 h. This indicates that the limited numbers of highly enriched bacterial prey available to the foraminifera in these experiments are not the major source of cytosol and organelle ¹⁵N-enrichment. If we assume that a single exponentially growing marine bacterium contains 35 fg N (Vrede et al., 2002) and an average foraminiferal specimen contains 219 ng N (Enge et al., 2018) it would require more than 10⁹ bacteria to supply all the N needs of the foraminiferal cell. Therefore, we conclude that the ¹⁵N-enrichment observed in the cytoplasm of G. bulloides and Ammonia sp. was predominantly due to direct ¹⁵N-ammonium assimilation by the foraminifera, rather than through digestion of ¹⁵N-labeled bacteria, although a small contribution from the latter cannot be excluded.

Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides appear to assimilate ammonium for growth and development without the use of the chloroplast-based GS/GOGAT pathway available in photosynthesizing symbionts or kleptoplasts (Alipanah et al., 2015; Sanz-Luque et al., 2015). Therefore, these heterotrophic protists must have an innate cellular pathway for inorganic ammonium assimilation, which could be driven by a mitochondrial-based GDH pathway and/or a cytosol-based GS/GOGAT pathway. In the absence of any complete or partial searchable genomes in the marine foraminifera, we performed a protein search for GDH, GS, and GOGAT within the only annotated foraminiferal genome currently available at NCBI; that of the fresh water species Reticulomyxa filosa (Assembly GCA_000512085.1; Glöckner et al., 2014). The GDH protein search yielded an NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase protein (NAD-GDH; GenBank accession ETO29704.1). GDH is found in all organisms, it links carbon and nitrogen metabolism, by catalyzing both the catabolic oxidative deamination of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate and ammonia, and the reverse anabolic reductive amination of α-ketoglutarate to glutamate (i.e., ammonium assimilation) (Hudson and Daniel, 1993). Although there is some debate about the predominant directionality of the reaction, the high K_m of GDH for ammonium may prohibit ammonium assimilation, under normal cellular conditions in most eukaryotic organisms (Li et al., 2011; van Heeswijk et al., 2013). GDH is found in three basic types specific for different co-factors: NAD-dependent, NADP-dependent and NAD/NADP-dependent (Hudson and Daniel, 1993). In micro-organisms, some evidence suggests that the catabolic reaction producing α-ketoglutarate is largely carried out by NAD-GDH, and the anabolic ammonium assimilation reaction is predominantly carried out by NADP-GDH, although there are exceptions (Miller and Magasanik, 1990; Chavez and Candau, 1991; Hudson and Daniel, 1993). The identification of an NAD-GDH in R. filosa, hints at a role in the catabolic oxidative deamination of glutamate rather than in ammonium assimilation. However, characterization of this enzyme, and an understanding of gene regulation would be necessary to fully determine directionality in this organism. The GS protein search yielded a GS catalytic region protein (GenBank accession ETO36073.1) with around 50% identity with GS from several bacteria from the phylum bacteriodetes of the genus Dyadobacter (e.g., Dyadobacter tibetensis, 52.7% identity, accession number WP_025763368). The GOGAT protein search yielded a partial (200 amino acids) putative NAD(P)H-dependent glutamate synthase (GenBank accession ETO26634.1). However, a BLASTp search with this putative GOGAT enzyme sequence produced no matches indicating a lack of similarity with other GOGAT enzymes. Nevertheless, the presence of a GS catalytic region and a putative GOGAT indicates that, in addition to GDH, the freshwater R. filosa potentially houses the alternative, more energetically expensive, but higher affinity GS/GOGAT ammonium assimilation pathway. Finally, we performed a protein search for an ammonium transporter in the R. filosa genome revealing both a putative Amt transporter (Genbank accession ET023911.1) and a putative Rhesus ammonium transporter (Genbank accession ETO07715.1). The Amt transporter (found in bacteria, archaea, fungi, and plants) and its analogs, methylammonium permease (yeast) and Rhesus proteins (animals) are a family of integral membrane proteins, found in nearly all organisms. They carry out the high affinity and highly selective movement of ammonium across biological membranes (Pantoja, 2012). The presence of the putative AmtB, Rhesus type-A, GDH and GS in R. filosa alongside our NanoSIMS evidence, suggests that assimilation of ammonium may be found across freshwater, benthic and planktonic foraminifera.

The role of inorganic N-assimilation in these heterotrophic protists may be as a supplementary to food ingestion when inorganic ammonium availability is high. Ammonium availability will be sporadic for the planktonic G. bulloides in the open ocean habitat, and perhaps one function of the N-enriched fibrillar bodies is as a proteinaceous N store under N-replete conditions. Whether Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides harbor and utilize one or both assimilatory pathways is yet to be determined, and indeed, they may use different pathways given the difference in the concentration of ammonium in the open ocean vs. coastal sediments (e.g., 38). Once more genetic information is available for foraminfera, an investigation of the ammonium-assimilation genes in marine foraminifera is required to determine the pathway, the prevalence and the genetic and environmental control of this system in these heterotrophic protists.

The Marine Nitrogen Cycle

The microbial loop, first proposed by Azam et al. (1983), is a model of the system of carbon and nutrient cycling through the microbial components of the marine ecosystem. It channels particulate and dissolved carbon and nutrients (e.g., organic and inorganic N) via bacteria to heterotrophic protists, and into the wider food web via larger zooplankton, fish and cetaceans. The ability of heterotrophic protists to utilize DIN reveals an additional pathway within the microbial loop for N-assimilation into the food web. Heterotrophic protists are ubiquitous (Pernice et al., 2015; Mangot et al., 2018) and their functionality diverse (Sherr et al., 2007; Caron et al., 2012; Mitra et al., 2016). Many phototrophic species contribute to primary production and inorganic nutrient uptake, whilst others like Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides act at a variety of trophic levels through their diets of bacteria, phytoplankton and metazoans (Bird et al., 2017; Chronopoulou et al., 2019). Despite the bioavailability of ammonium (compared to N₂ for example) and the ubiquity of heterotrophic protists, the across-taxa ability to assimilate ammonium is currently unknown. In addition, cell-specific ammonium uptake rates are rarely documented (Klawonn et al., 2019). Yet, taxa-specific nutrient preferences, assimilation rates and quantitatively important taxa for ammonium cycling are all important factors in understanding ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical cycling. These in turn, are dependent on the characteristics of the individual species present, the assemblage diversity and shifts in time and space driven by environmental parameters (Piredda et al., 2017).

Conclusion

In conclusion, using TEM and NanoSIMS we demonstrate that two heterotrophic protists from contrasting marine habitats have an innate pathway for ammonium assimilation into organelles crucial to growth and development, indicating that heterotrophy is not the only source of N for these organisms. This provides evidence that the observed ammonium assimilation in the mixotrophic foraminiferal species, Orbulina universa (LeKieffre et al., 2020) and two benthic kleptoplastic species (LeKieffre et al., 2018b; Jauffrais et al., 2019), could be carried out by the foraminifera themselves rather than the symbionts. In addition, a GenBank search has highlighted putative ammonium assimilation proteins; the ammonium transporters AmtB and Rhesus Type-A and glutamate dehydrogenase, annotated in the genome of the freshwater foraminifer R. filosa. This suggests that inorganic ammonium assimilation may potentially occur in both freshwater and marine foraminifera. Additional work to study the genes involved in ammonium assimilation in the foraminifera, and the environmental conditions under which uptake of ammonium occurs need to be carried out. In addition, the ammonium assimilation pathway should be investigated in other heterotrophic protists to begin to understand the contribution of this newly revealed pathway to the microbial loop and ecosystem functioning.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

CB and CL devised and carried out the experiments and wrote the manuscript. TJ, EG, HF, AM, and OM provided advice, resources, and material for working on benthic foraminifera. EG and AM provided guidance on experimental set up of benthic experiments. AR and JF provided resources and expertise and assisted in collection and culturing of the planktonic foraminifera. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by a NERC and Edinburgh University funded Daphne Jackson Fellowship awarded to CB, and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. 200021_149333) awarded to AM. This work was also a contribution to OM’s CRCT project funded by the University of Bordeaux. OM was also supported by a KVA (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences) grant for Internationalization and Scientific Renewal at the Sven Lovén Centre (SLC) for Marine Sciences. The specimen collections on Catalina Island were supported by US National Science Foundation award OCE-1261519 (AR and JF).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The electron microscopy platform at the Universities of Lausanne (Switzerland) and Edinburgh (United Kingdom; Steve Mitchell) are thanked for technical assistance. CL wishes to thank Howie Spero for the opportunity to sample at Catalina Island.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.604979/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Representative ion counts for the ions ¹²C¹²C^–, ¹³C¹²C^–-, ¹²C¹⁴N^–, and ¹²C¹⁵N^– for the species Ammonia sp. and G. bulloides obtained after drift correction and accumulation of the six to eight sequential images acquired using the software L’IMAGE.

Supplementary Figure 2 | ¹⁵N cellular localization in the electron-opaque bodies and fibrillar vesicles of G. bulloides after 6 h. Arrows: electron-opaque bodies; circles: fibrillar vesicles.

Supplementary Table 1 | Sampling information and experimental manipulations for each foraminiferal specimen collected.

Supplementary Table 2 | Excel spreadsheet of raw data with means and SDs of natural isotopic δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N values and ¹⁵N enrichments in regions of interest (ROIs) in different sub-cellular structures within G. bulloides and Ammonia sp. ROIs were drawn on the NanoSIMS images with the software L’IMAGE to quantify mean ¹⁵N enrichments of a given foraminifera. Note that control values were measured on Ammonia sp. and Orbulina universa species.

References

Alipanah, L., Rohloff, J., Winge, P., Bones, A. M., and Brembu, T. (2015). Whole-cell response to nitrogen deprivation in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 6281–6296.

Google Scholar

Anderson, O. R., and Bé, A. W. H. (1976). The ultrastructure of a planktonic foraminifer, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady), and its symbiotic dinoflagellates. J. Foraminifer. Res. 6, 1–21. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.6.1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Azam, F., Fenchel, T., Field, J. G., Grey, J. S., Meyer-Reil, L. A., and Thingstad, F. (1983). The ecological role of water-column microbes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 10, 257–263. doi: 10.3354/meps010257

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bird, C., Darling, K. F., Russell, A. D., Davis, C. V., Fehrenbacher, J., Free, A., et al. (2017). Cyanobacterial endobionts within a major marine planktonic calcifier (Globigerina bulloides, Foraminifera) revealed by 16S rRNA metabarcoding. Biogeosciences 14, 901–920. doi: 10.5194/bg-14-901-2017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bird, C., Darling, K. F., Russell, A. D., Fehrenbacher, J. S., Davis, C. V., Free, A., et al. (2018). 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding and TEM reveals different ecological strategies within the genus Neogloboquadrina (planktonic foraminifer). PLoS One 13:e0191653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bird, C., Schweizer, M., Roberts, A., Austin, W. E., Knudsen, K. L., Evans, K. M., et al. (2020). The genetic diversity, morphology, biogeography, and taxonomic designations of Ammonia (Foraminifera) in the Northeast Atlantic. Mar. Micropaleontol. 155:101726. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2019.02.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bond, N. A., Cronin, M. F., Freeland, H., and Mantua, N. (2015). Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 3414–3420. doi: 10.1002/2015gl063306

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caron, D. A., Countway, P. D., Jones, A. C., Kim, D. Y., and Schnetzer, A. (2012). Marine protistan diversity. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 467–493. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chavez, S., and Candau, P. (1991). An NAD-specific glutamate dehydrogenase from cyanobacteria identification and properties. FEBS Lett. 285, 35–38. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80719-j

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chronopoulou, P.-M., Salonen, I., Bird, C., Reichart, G.-J., and Koho, K. A. (2019). Metabarcoding insights into the trophic behavior and identity of intertidal benthic foraminifera. Front. Microbiol. 10:1169. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darling, K. F., and Wade, C. M. (2008). The genetic diversity of planktic foraminifera and the global distribution of ribosomal RNA genotypes. Mar. Micropaleontol. 67, 216–238. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2008.01.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dupuy, C., Rossignol, L., Geslin, E., and Pascal, P.-Y. (2010). Predation of mudflat meio-macrofaunal metazoans by a calcareous foraminifer, Ammonia tepida (Cushman, 1926). J. Foraminifer. Res. 40, 305–312. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.40.4.305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enge, A. J., Wanek, W., and Heinz, P. (2018). Preservation effects on isotopic signatures in benthic foraminiferal biomass. Mar. Micropaleontol. 144, 50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2018.09.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enge, A. J., Wukovits, J., Wanek, W., Watzka, M., Witte, U. F. M., Hunter, W. R., et al. (2016). Carbon and nitrogen uptake of calcareous benthic foraminifera along a depth-related oxygen gradient in the OMZ of the Arabian Sea. Front. Microbiol. 7:71. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Field, D. B. (2004). Variability in vertical distributions of planktonic foraminifera in the California current: relationships to vertical ocean structure. Paleoceanography 19:PA2014.

Google Scholar

Gastrich, M. D. (1987). Ultrastructure of a new intracellular symbiotic alga found within planktonic foraminifera. J. Phycol. 23, 623–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1987.tb04215.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gibbin, E., Banc-Prandi, G., Fine, M., Comment, A., and Meibom, A. (2020). A method to disentangle and quantify host anabolic turnover in photosymbiotic holobionts with subcellular resolution. Commun. Biol. 3:14. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0742-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glock, N., Roy, A.-S., Romero, D., Wein, T., Weissenbach, J., Revsbech, N. P., et al. (2019). Metabolic preference of nitrate over oxygen as an electron acceptor in foraminifera from the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 2860–2865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813887116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glock, N., Schönfeld, J., Eisenhauer, A., Hensen, C., Mallon, J., and Sommer, S. (2013). The role of benthic foraminifera in the benthic nitrogen cycle of the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone. Biogeosciences 10, 4767–4783. doi: 10.5194/bg-10-4767-2013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glöckner, G., Hülsmann, N., Schleicher, M., Noegel, A. A., Eichinger, L., Gallinger, C., et al. (2014). The genome of the foraminiferan Reticulomyxa filosa. Curr. Biol. 24, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gruber, N. (2008). The marine nitrogen cycle: overview and challenges. Nitrogen Mar. Environ. 2, 1–50. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-372522-6.00001-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Høgslund, S., Revsbech, N. P., Cedhagen, T., Nielsen, L. P., and Gallardo, V. A. (2008). Denitrification, nitrate turnover, and aerobic respiration by benthic foraminiferans in the oxygen minimum zone off Chile. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 359, 85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.02.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holzmann, M., and Pawlowski, J. (2000). Taxonomic relationships in the genus Ammonia (Foraminifera) based on ribosomal DNA sequences. J. Micropalaeontol. 19, 85–95. doi: 10.1144/jm.19.1.85

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hönisch, B., Bijma, J., Russell, A. D., Spero, H. J., Palmer, M. R., Zeebe, R. E., et al. (2003). The influence of symbiont photosynthesis on the boron isotopic composition of foraminifera shells. Mar. Micropaleontol. 49, 87–96. doi: 10.1016/s0377-8398(03)00030-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudson, R. C., and Daniel, R. M. (1993). l-glutamate dehydrogenases: distribution, properties and mechanism. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Comp. Biochem. 106, 767–792. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(93)90031-Y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jauffrais, T., Jesus, B., Metzger, E., Mouget, J.-L., Jorissen, F., and Geslin, E. (2016). Effect of light on photosynthetic efficiency of sequestered chloroplasts in intertidal benthic foraminifera (Haynesina germanica and Ammonia tepida). Biogeosciences 13, 2715–2726. doi: 10.5194/bg-13-2715-2016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jauffrais, T., LeKieffre, C., Koho, K. A., Tsuchiya, M., Schweizer, M., Bernhard, J. M., et al. (2018). Ultrastructure and distribution of kleptoplasts in benthic foraminifera from shallow-water (photic) habitats. Mar. Micropaleontol. 138, 46–62. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.10.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jauffrais, T., LeKieffre, C., Schweizer, M., Geslin, E., Metzger, E., Bernhard, J. M., et al. (2019). Kleptoplastidic benthic foraminifera from aphotic habitats: insights into assimilation of inorganic C, N and S studied with sub-cellular resolution. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 125–141. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katz, M. E., Cramer, B. S., Franzese, A., Hönisch, B., Miller, K. G., Rosenthal, Y., et al. (2010). Traditional and emerging geochemical proxies in foraminifera. J. Foraminifer. Res. 40, 165–192. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.40.2.165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klawonn, I., Bonaglia, S., Whitehouse, M. J., Littmann, S., Tienken, D., Kuypers, M. M. M., et al. (2019). Untangling hidden nutrient dynamics: rapid ammonium cycling and single-cell ammonium assimilation in marine plankton communities. ISME J. 13, 1960–1974. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0386-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleijne, A., Kroon, D., and Zevenboom, W. (1989). Phytoplankton and foraminiferal frequencies in northern Indian Ocean and Red Sea surface waters. Neth. J. Sea Res. 24, 531–539. doi: 10.1016/0077-7579(89)90131-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koho, K. A., LeKieffre, C., Nomaki, H., Salonen, I., Geslin, E., Mabilleau, G., et al. (2018). Changes in ultrastructural features of the foraminifera Ammonia spp. in response to anoxic conditions: field and laboratory observations. Mar. Micropaleontol. 138, 72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.10.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuypers, M. M., Marchant, H. K., and Kartal, B. (2018). The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 263–276. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langer, M. R. (1992). Biosynthesis of glycosaminoglycans in foraminifera: a review. Mar. Micropaleontol. 19, 245–255. doi: 10.1016/0377-8398(92)90031-E

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., Freudenthal, H. D., Kossoy, V., and Bé, A. W. H. (1965). Cytological observations on two planktonic foraminifera, Globigerina bulloides d’Orbigny, 1826, and Globigerinoides ruber (d’Orbigny, 1839) Cushman, 1927. J. Protozool. 12, 531–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1965.tb03253.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LeKieffre, C., Bernhard, J. M., Mabilleau, G., Filipsson, H. L., Meibom, A., and Geslin, E. (2018a). An overview of cellular ultrastructure in benthic foraminifera: new observations of rotalid species in the context of existing literature. Mar. Micropaleontol. 138, 12–32. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.10.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LeKieffre, C., Jauffrais, T., Geslin, E., Jesus, B., Bernhard, J. M., Giovani, M.-E., et al. (2018b). Inorganic carbon and nitrogen assimilation in cellular compartments of a benthic kleptoplastic foraminifer. Sci. Rep. 8:10140.

Google Scholar

LeKieffre, C., Spero, H. J., Russell, A. D., Fehrenbacher, J. S., Geslin, E., and Meibom, A. (2018c). Assimilation, translocation, and utilization of carbon between photosynthetic symbiotic dinoflagellates and their planktic foraminifera host. Mar. Biol. 165:104. doi: 10.1007/s00227-018-3362-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LeKieffre, C., Spangenberg, J. E., Mabilleau, G., Escrig, S., Meibom, A., and Geslin, E. (2017). Surviving anoxia in marine sediments: the metabolic response of ubiquitous benthic foraminifera (Ammonia tepida). PLoS One 12:e0177604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LeKieffre, C., Spero, H. J., Fehrenbacher, J. S., Russell, A. D., Ren, H., Geslin, E., et al. (2020). Ammonium is the preferred source of nitrogen for planktonic foraminifer and their dinoflagellate symbionts. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 287:20200620. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leutenegger, S. (1977). Ultrastructure de foraminifères perforés et imperforés ainsi que de leurs symbiotes. Cah. Micropaléontol. 3, 1–52.

Google Scholar

Li, M., Li, C., Allen, A., Stanley, C. A., and Smith, T. J. (2011). The structure and allosteric regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase. Neurochem. Int. 59, 445–455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.10.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loussert-Fonta, C., Toullec, G., Paraecattil, A. A., Jeangros, Q., Krueger, T., Escrig, S., et al. (2020). Correlation of fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy, and NanoSIMS stable isotope imaging on a single tissue section. Commun. Biol. 3:362.

Google Scholar

Mangot, J.-F., Forn, I., Obiol, A., and Massana, R. (2018). Constant abundances of ubiquitous uncultured protists in the open sea assessed by automated microscopy. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 3876–3889. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, S. M., and Magasanik, B. (1990). Role of NAD-linked glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 172, 4927–4935. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.9.4927-4935.1990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitra, A., Flynn, K. J., Tillmann, U., Raven, J. A., Caron, D., Stoecker, D. K., et al. (2016). Defining planktonic protist functional groups on mechanisms for energy and nutrient acquisition: incorporation of diverse mixotrophic strategies. Protist 167, 106–120. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moodley, L., Boschker, H. T., Middelburg, J. J., Pel, R., Herman, P. M., De Deckere, E., et al. (2000). Ecological significance of benthic foraminifera: 13C labelling experiments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 202, 289–295. doi: 10.3354/meps202289

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mulholland, M. R., and Lomas, M. W. (2008). “Nitrogen uptake and assimilation,” in Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, 2nd Edn, eds D. Capone, D. Bronk, M. Mulholland, and E. Carpenter (New York, NY: Academic Press), 303–384. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-372522-6.00007-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murray, J. W. (2006). Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Naidu, P. D., and Malmgren, B. A. (1996). Relationship between late quaternary upwelling history and coiling properties of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma and Globigerina bulloides in the Arabian Sea. J. Foraminifer. Res. 26, 64–70. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.26.1.64

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nomaki, H., Bernhard, J. M., Ishida, A., Tsuchiya, M., Uematsu, K., Tame, A., et al. (2016). Intracellular isotope localization in Ammonia sp. (Foraminifera) of oxygen-depleted environments: results of nitrate and sulfate labeling experiments. Front. Microbiol. 7:163. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nomaki, H., LeKieffre, C., Escrig, S., Meibom, A., Yagyu, S., Richardson, E. A., et al. (2018). Innovative TEM-coupled approaches to study foraminiferal cells. Mar. Micropaleontol. 138, 90–104. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.10.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pantoja, O. (2012). High affinity ammonium transporters: molecular mechanism of action. Front. Plant Sci. 3:34. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pascal, P.-Y., Dupuy, C., Richard, P., and Niquil, N. (2008). Bacterivory in the common foraminifer Ammonia tepida: isotope tracer experiment and the controlling factors. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 359, 55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.02.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pernice, M. C., Forn, I., Gomes, A., Lara, E., Alonso-Sáez, L., Arrieta, J. M., et al. (2015). Global abundance of planktonic heterotrophic protists in the deep ocean. ISME J. 9, 782–792. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piña-Ochoa, E., Hogslund, S., Geslin, E., Cedhagen, T., Revsbech, N. P., Nielsen, L. P., et al. (2010). Widespread occurrence of nitrate storage and denitrification among Foraminifera and Gromiida. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1148–1153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908440107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piredda, R., Tomasino, M. P., D’Erchia, A. M., Manzari, C., Pesole, G., Montresor, M., et al. (2017). Diversity and temporal patterns of planktonic protist assemblages at a Mediterranean long term ecological research site. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93:fiw200. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Risgaard-Petersen, N., Langezaal, A. M., Ingvardsen, S., Schmid, M. C., Jetten, M. S. M., Op den Camp, H. J. M., et al. (2006). Evidence for complete denitrification in a benthic foraminifer. Nature 443, 93–96. doi: 10.1038/nature05070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanz-Luque, E., Chamizo-Ampudia, A., Llamas, A., Galvan, A., and Fernandez, E. (2015). Understanding nitrate assimilation and its regulation in microalgae. Front. Plant Sci. 6:899. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00899

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sautter, L. R., and Thunell, R. C. (1991). Planktonic foraminiferal response to upwelling and seasonal hydrographic conditions; sediment trap results from San Pedro Basin, Southern California Bight. J. Foraminifer. Res. 21, 347–363. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.21.4.347

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schiebel, R. (2002). Planktic foraminiferal sedimentation and the marine calcite budget. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 16:1065. doi: 10.1029/2001GB001459

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schiebel, R., Barker, S., Lendt, R., Thomas, H., and Bollmann, J. (2007). Planktic foraminiferal dissolution in the twilight zone. Deep Sea Res. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 54, 676–686. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.01.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schiebel, R., and Hemleben, C. (eds). (2017). Planktic Foraminifers in the Modern Ocean. Berlin: Springer.

Google Scholar

Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B., Caron, D. A., Vaulot, D., and Worden, A. Z. (2007). Oceanic protists. Oceanography 20, 130–134. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2007.57

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smart, S. M., Ren, H., Fawcett, S. E., Schiebel, R., Conte, M., Rafter, P. A., et al. (2018). Ground-truthing the planktic foraminifer-bound nitrogen isotope paleo-proxy in the Sargasso Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 235, 463–482. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.05.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spero, H. J. (1987). Symbiosis in the Planktonic Foraminifer, Orbulina universa, and the isolation of its symbiotic dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium béii Sp. Nov.1. J. Phycol. 23, 307–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1987.tb04139.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spero, H. J. (1988). Ultrastructural examination of chamber morphogenesis and biomineralization in the planktonic foraminifer Orbulina universa. Mar. Biol. 99, 9–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00644972

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spero, H. J., and Lea, D. W. (1996). Experimental determination of stable isotope variability in Globigerina bulloides: implications for paleoceanographic reconstructions. Mar. Micropaleontol. 28, 231–246. doi: 10.1016/0377-8398(96)00003-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thunell, R., and Sautter, L. R. (1992). Planktonic foraminiferal faunal and stable isotopic indices of upwelling: a sediment trap study in the San Pedro Basin, Southern California Bight. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 64, 77–91. doi: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1992.064.01.05

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uhle, M. E., Macko, S. A., Spero, H. J., Engel, M. H., and Lea, D. W. (1997). Sources of carbon and nitrogen in modern planktonic foraminifera: the role of algal symbionts as determined by bulk and compound specific stable isotopic analyses. Org. Geochem. 27, 103–113. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00075-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Heeswijk, W. C., Westerhoff, H. V., and Boogerd, F. C. (2013). Nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli: putting molecular data into a systems perspective. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 628–695. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00025-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vrede, K., Heldal, M., Norland, S., and Bratbak, G. (2002). Elemental composition (C, N, P) and cell volume of exponentially growing and nutrient-limited bacterioplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 2965–2971. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.6.2965-2971.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weiner, S., and Erez, J. (1984). Organic matrix of the shell of the foraminifer, Heterostegina depressa. J. Foraminifer. Res. 14, 206–212. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.14.3.206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Woehle, C., Roy, A.-S., Glock, N., Wein, T., Weissenbach, J., Rosenstiel, P., et al. (2018). A novel eukaryotic denitrification pathway in foraminifera. Curr. Biol. 28, 2536–2543.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar