Jaime Esteban*
Marta García-Coca- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
The genus Mycobacterium includes human pathogens (Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae) and environmental organisms known as non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) that, when associated with biomaterials and chronic disease, can cause human infections. A common pathogenic factor of mycobacteria is the formation of biofilms. Various molecules are involved in this process, including glycopeptidolipids, shorter-chain mycolic acids, and GroEL1 chaperone. Nutrients, ions, and carbon sources influence bacterial behavior and have a regulatory role in biofilm formation. The ultrastructure of mycobacterial biofilms can be studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy, a technique that reveals different phenotypic characteristics. Cording is associated with NTM pathogenicity, and is also considered an important property of M. tuberculosis strains. Mycobacterial biofilms are more resistant to environmental aggressions and disinfectants than the planktonic form. Biofilm-forming mycobacteria have been reported in many environmental studies, especially in water systems. NTM cause respiratory disease in patients with underlying diseases, such as old tuberculosis scars, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis. Pathogens can be either slowly growing mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium avium complex, or rapidly growing species, such as Mycobacterium abscessus. Another important biofilm-related group of infections are those associated with biomaterials, and in this setting the most frequently isolated organisms are rapidly growing mycobacteria. M. tuberculosis can develop a biofilm which plays a role in the process of casseous necrosis and cavity formation in lung tissue. M. tuberculosis also develops biofilms on clinical biomaterials. Biofilm development is an important factor for antimicrobial resistance, as it affords protection against antibiotics that are normally active against the same bacteria in the planktonic state. This antibiotic resistance of biofilm-forming microorganisms may result in treatment failure, and biofilms have to be physically eradicated to resolve the infection. New strategies with potential antibiofilm molecules that improve treatment efficacy have been developed. A novel antibiofilm approach focuses on Methylobacterium sp. An understanding of biofilm is essential for the appropriate management of patients with many NTM diseases, while the recent discovery of M. tuberculosis biofilms opens a new research field.
Introduction
The genus Mycobacterium currently includes more than 170 species (Tortoli, 2006, 2014). Most of these species are environmental organisms that have never been implicated in human infection, whereas others are among the oldest human pathogens ever described. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and members of the M. tuberculosis complex are still among the most important causes of disease, and the epidemiological and social importance of Mycobacterium leprae is beyond doubt (Esteban and Muñoz-Egea, 2016). However, all other human pathogens are also environmental organisms that can be found in many different ecosystems without public health implications. These organisms, known as non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM), can cause human infections in special circumstances, in many cases involving the presence of biomaterials; in other cases, they cause chronic infections in patients with underlying diseases or even outbreaks associated with environmental sources (Esteban et al., 2012). In this review, we will explore the importance of biofilms in mycobacterial disease and in environmental sources, and the implications of these structures in the diagnosis and treatment of mycobacterial diseases.
History
The first report of the modern concept of biofilm dates from 1978, when Costerton et al. published their initial observations (Costerton et al., 1978). Another decade later, articles began to appear on environmental mycobacterial biofilms (Wallace, 1987; Schulze-Robbecke and Fischeder, 1989), even though the phenomenon of mycobacterial cells forming “aggregates” or “pellicles” was described in the early days of mycobacteriology (Löwenstein, 1920; Calmette, 1936): in a pivotal article on the etiology of tuberculosis, Robert Koch described the appearance of “cells which are pressed together and arranged in bundles” (Koch, 1982). Subsequent studies described M. tuberculosis forming “pellicles” in liquid media, with images (Calmette, 1936) quite similar to what in modern times are described as biofilms (Ojha et al., 2008). Similar descriptions for avian bacilli and others were also reported (Löwenstein, 1920), so it was clearly demonstrated that mycobacteria naturally grow in biofilm structures. Decades more then passed before laboratory methods were developed to achieve dispersed mycobacterial cell growth (Dubos and Davis, 1946; Pierce et al., 1947). Despite all this knowledge, however, it was not until the 1990s that the current concept of biofilm emerged from the first findings of modern research on mycobacterial biofilms.
Characteristics of Mycobacterial Biofilms
Biofilms formed by mycobacteria can be defined in the same way as any other biofilms. However, some mycobacteria can develop these structures not only on surfaces, but also on the air-media interface (Ojha et al., 2008). This phenomenon may be explained by the different composition of the extracellular matrix of the biofilm and the unique characteristics of mycobacterial cell wall, especially the presence of high lipid levels. As with many other organisms, biofilm development starts with bacterial adhesion and then proceeds through the different stages of surface attachment, sessile growth, matrix synthesis, and dispersal. Intercellular communication occurs through a quorum-sensing phenomenon (Richards and Ojha, 2014). Different molecules from the bacterial cell wall called adhesins mediate the initial attachment of bacteria to the surfaces. Once attached to the surface, sessile bacteria initiate the synthesis of an extracellular matrix, usually composed of glycopeptides, DNA, and other molecules. However, mycobacteria lack surface fimbriae or pili, although certain proteins have been described as potential factors for the aggregation of mycobacteria and attachment to other cells (Menozzi et al., 1996). Nor do mycobacteria produce the usual exopolysaccharide components of extracellular matrix, but they can attach to different surfaces (Zamora et al., 2007) and form fully developed biofilms (Zambrano and Kolter, 2005; Ojha et al., 2015).
Several studies confirm that NTM have the ability to adhere to biomaterials. Vess et al. showed how several species of mycobacteria can adhere to polyvinyl chloride (Vess et al., 1993); Ridgway et al. analyzed the adherence of Mycobacterium sp. to the cellulose diacetate (Ridgway et al., 1984); and Zamora et al. studied the adherence of NTM to polypropylene (Zamora et al., 2007). In this last study, differences in adherence were verified, not only between species, but also between strains of the same species. After adherence, mycobacterial biofilm is formed. Another study of different species of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) showed that biofilm development by these species follows a sigmoid growth kinetic (Esteban et al., 2008). This study in laboratory strains was later confirmed in clinical strains, and differences were noted depending on their clinical significance (Martin-de-Hijas et al., 2009). Nutrients, ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, and Zn2+), and carbon sources, such as glucose and peptone, are known to influence bacterial behavior and have a regulatory role in the formation of biofilm (Carter et al., 2003). Esteban et al. (2008) showed that RGM can develop biofilm using only tap water as the nutrient source, which may explain the detection of mycobacteria from water sources. Although Mycobacterium avium complex organisms were among the first mycobacterial biofilms ever described (Carter et al., 2003), many NTM have been found in heterospecies biofilms from environmental specimens (Falkinham, 2002, 2009).
Several studies have examined the role of different molecules in the formation of these biofilms and in their composition. Recht et al. showed that Mycobacterium smegmatis glycopeptidolipids are essential for initial surface attachment during biofilm formation (Recht and Kolter, 2001). These molecules also have an essential role in sliding motility, a property of many strains of mycobacteria that can be related with biofilm spreading to contiguous surfaces (Recht et al., 2000; Recht and Kolter, 2001; Maya-Hoyos et al., 2015). However, biofilm development and sliding motility are not always associated, according to another study in a large sample of RGM clinical strains (Martin-de-Hijas et al., 2009). Ojha et al. demonstrated that in non-motile mycobacteria, shorter-chain mycolic acids have important role in the development of biofilm structure (Ojha et al., 2008). They also proposed that these shorter mycolic acids may form a hydrophobic extracellular matrix (Ojha et al., 2005). The high resistance to antibiotics and disinfectants associated with these organisms is attributed mainly to mycolic acids, which help provide a permeability barrier (Zambrano and Kolter, 2005). Many other molecules have also been studied (Ojha et al., 2015). Ojha et al. explored the role of GroEL1 chaperone in the development of M. smegmatis biofilms (Ojha et al., 2005; Esteban et al., 2008), and the complexity of mycobacterial biofilm structure and development is also being investigated.
The ultrastructure of mycobacterial biofilms has also been studied with different methodologies. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) combined with two fluorescent dyes, Nile Red© (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and LIVE/DEAD BacLight© (Invitrogen, USA), has been used to analyze the phenotypic characteristics of biofilms formed by some RGM (growth rate, percentage of covered surface, percentage of live/dead bacteria, and autofluorescence), showing differences between species (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2013). In this study, Muñoz-Egea et al. showed that maximum thickness for Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium chelonae biofilm was detected at 72 h, but other non-pigmented RGM reach maximum thickness at 96 h. M. chelonae covered a smaller surface area than Mycobacterium abscessus, but a greater area than M. fortuitum and Mycobacterium mageritense (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2013). Interestingly, autofluorescence, which has been found among different mycobacterial species (Patino et al., 2008), can be detected not only in sessile bacteria but also in the extracellular matrix. Patino et al. speculate that coenzyme F420 could be involved in this phenomenon. This molecule may be secreted by the bacterial components of the biofilm, and is thus detectable in extracellular matrix using CLSM (Patino et al., 2008; Joshi et al., 2013; Muñoz-Egea et al., 2013).
Growth characteristics also differ between Mycobacterium species. M. chelonae forms a biofilm that grows vertically, while M. fortuitum covers the entire surface with a thinner growth. Extensive cording is observed in the cases of M. abscessus and M. chelonae (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2013). Cording is associated with pathogenicity (Williams et al., 2009; Muñoz-Egea et al., 2013), and the deletion of a dehydratase gene that affects cording made M. abscessus strains avirulent (Halloum et al., 2016). Cording has long been considered an important property of M. tuberculosis strains, and contributes to the pathogenesis of tuberculosis (Maya-Hoyos et al., 2015). The implications of cording and biofilm development by M. tuberculosis are still being investigated (Caceres et al., 2013).
Mycobacterial Biofilms in the Environment
The ability of mycobacteria to live in biofilms confers these organisms many advantages over the planktonic form of growth, including, for example, resistance to environmental aggressions, and mycobacteria that grow in biofilms appear to be related to environmental sources (Schulze-Robbecke and Fischeder, 1989; Schulze-Robbecke et al., 1992; Schulze-Robbecke, 1993). Many reports of environmental studies have demonstrated the presence of these mycobacteria, especially in water systems (Falkinham, 2002, 2009). Other studies have shown the role of these reservoirs in the development of outbreaks caused by these organisms, including infections secondary to cosmetic interventions, medical procedures, and others (Meyers et al., 2002; Winthrop et al., 2002; Vijayaraghavan et al., 2006; van Ingen et al., 2009; Kennedy et al., 2012; El Helou et al., 2013b; Walker et al., 2017). Recently, Mycobacterium chimaera has emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen associated with contamination of heater-cooler units for cardiac surgery throughout the world (Kohler et al., 2015), and special decontamination measures have been necessary to remove mycobacterial biofilms from these devices (Garvey et al., 2016, 2017). In this respect, it is important to take into account that sessile mycobacteria show greater resistance to disinfectants than planktonic species. One report even described NTM detected in the bottom of a glutaraldehyde solution tray (Vijayaraghavan et al., 2006).
It has recently postulated that rising numbers of NTM isolated from clinical samples could be related to changes in disinfectants used in plumbing systems, in particular, the switch from chlorine to chloramine in water systems in the USA (Falkinham, 2016). Unexplained changes in the numbers of isolates have also been described (Esteban et al., 2007), so it seems likely that many questions regarding the ecology of these organisms remain to be clarified.
An interesting issue is the relationship between NTM and free-living amoebae (Vaerewijck et al., 2005). It is well-known that mycobacteria can be intracellular parasites, which may explain the potential relationship between NTM and amoeba in water and biofilm samples (Marciano-Cabral et al., 2010; Ovrutsky et al., 2013). These mixed eukaryotic-prokaryotic biofilms can be a source of human infections and a growing factor in resistance against disinfectants.
Mycobacterial Biofilms in Medicine: Clinical Implications
Since the concept emerged, biofilms have been recognized as an especially important pathogenic factor in human infections (Hall-Stoodley and Stoodley, 2005). Although acute infections are mainly caused by planktonic organisms, the pathogenesis of chronic diseases seems to be strongly associated with biofilm formation. Moreover, the growing importance of biomaterials, such as catheters or prostheses, in modern medicine has contributed to the significance of biofilms and their management in human disease (Patino et al., 2008; Qvist et al., 2014, 2015).
The clinical relevance of mycobacterial biofilms can be analyzed in two groups: biofilms in NTM disease and biofilms in tuberculosis. These two groups will be analyzed below.
Non-tuberculous Mycobacterial Disease
The spectrum of diseases caused by NTM is wide, but almost all of them share a common characteristic: they are usually chronic.
One of the most common syndromes caused by NTM is respiratory disease (Wallace et al., 1983; Griffith et al., 2007; Esteban et al., 2012), caused either by slowly growing mycobacteria, such as M. avium complex, or rapidly growing species, such as M. abscessus. Respiratory disease usually affects patients with predisposing conditions, such as old tuberculosis scars, silicosis, bullae, and other lung cavities where NTM can develop a biofilm that first colonizes the host, and later causes invasive disease. This syndrome was first recognized several decades ago (Wolinsky, 1979, 1992), and has always been difficult to manage. In recent times, new populations of patients especially susceptible to these pathogens have been identified. These include patients with chronic bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis, conditions which have been recently reported as predisposing factors for NTM infections (Benwill and Wallace, 2014; Qvist et al., 2014; Floto et al., 2016; Hoiby et al., 2017). The association between these infections and biofilm has been documented (Qvist et al., 2015). Mycobacterial biofilms have recently been identified in histological samples from lung cavitary disease (Fennelly et al., 2016). Experimental data also show the importance of biofilm development in the ability of M. avium to invade bronchial epithelial cells (Yamazaki et al., 2006).
Another important biofilm-related group of infections, and the most typical, are those associated with biomaterial. NTM have been reported as the cause of different syndromes, the most frequently isolated organisms being RGM. These organisms behave as opportunistic pathogens and have been described in many different device-related infections. Among these, catheter-related bacteremia has been reported in many different populations, including cancer patients (El Helou et al., 2013b). Diagnosis is difficult, but in some cases these organisms can grow in conventional blood culture bottles. Catheter removal is mandatory for the management of these infections in all cases (El Helou et al., 2013a,b). Another catheter-related disease is peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. This syndrome has been described since the early days of CAPD use, and also requires catheter removal if cure is to be achieved (Hakim et al., 1993).
Other devices that can be infected with NTM are prosthetic joints. The most common causative agents are RGM (Eid et al., 2007), but slowly growing mycobacteria have also been isolated (Gupta and Clauss, 2009), albeit rarely (Benito et al., 2016). Although RGM can grow in common bacteriology media, slowly growing organisms usually require specific mycobacterial culture methods, so a high degree of suspicion is necessary before such diagnostic procedures are undertaken. Other biomaterial-related diseases include abdominal mesh infection (Celdran et al., 2007), pacemaker infection (Al-Ghamdi et al., 2016), prosthetic valve endocarditis (Bouchiat et al., 2015), mammoplasty infection, transplant-related keratitis, and others (Brown-Elliott and Wallace, 2002). Almost all of these syndromes require implant removal, since antibiotic therapy alone is incapable of eliminating the sessile organisms.
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Disease
Arguably one of the most interesting findings in recent years in the field of mycobacterial biofilm research is the discovery that M. tuberculosis can develop a biofilm. The first reports came from cases of tuberculosis infection associated with clinical biomaterial, prosthetic joints in particular (Tokumoto et al., 1995; Spinner et al., 1996; Berbari et al., 1998; Ha et al., 2005). Clinical observations led to the conclusion that biomaterial removal was essential to manage these infections, even if the M. tuberculosis strain was susceptible in vitro to the antibiotics used. The difficulty in treating these infections could be due to the fact that biofilm is a well-established mechanism of antibiotic resistance. Further studies have indeed demonstrated that M. tuberculosis can develop a biofilm in vitro, opening a new line of research in the pathogenesis of this disease (Ojha et al., 2008). Since then, several studies have determined the importance of different molecules, such as mycolic acids or DNA, in the development of M. tuberculosis biofilms, and the different regulatory mechanisms involved in this process have been revealed (Nayak, 2015; Ojha et al., 2015). However, the role of biofilms in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis remains unclear. This pathogenic process is complex, and involves, most importantly, intracellular survival and host defense evasion mechanisms. It has been suggested that the importance of biofilms in this disease is due to their participation in the process of casseous necrosis and cavitation formation in lung tissue, a site in which M. tuberculosis could form a biofilm (Kulka et al., 2012; Basaraba and Ojha, 2017). Further experiments have shown a decrease in the activity of antituberculous drugs against tuberculosis biofilms (Ojha et al., 2008; Islam et al., 2012). These discoveries prompted interest in biofilm-forming mechanisms as a potential target for new therapies against tuberculosis. Nevertheless, the clinical implications of these in vitro discoveries remain unresolved, and future research will probably furnish us with a new view of tuberculosis as a biofilm-related disease, to add to its other pathogenic factors.
Mycobacterial Biofilms in Medicine: Therapeutic Implications
Biofilm development is an important factor in antimicrobial resistance. It affords many bacterial species protection against antibiotics normally active against the same bacteria in the planktonic state (Hoyle and Costerton, 1991; Fux et al., 2005; Ciofu et al., 2017). Different mechanisms have been implicated in this resistance (permeability, metabolic states, activation of resistance genes, persister cells) (Anderson and O'Toole, 2008; Lewis, 2008; Kester and Fortune, 2014). Resistance to antibiotics, disinfectants, and germicides by biofilm-forming microorganisms may lead to treatment failure, and clinical experience has demonstrated that biofilms have to be physically eradicated to resolve the infection (Hall-Stoodley et al., 2012). Several studies have found mycobacterial biofilms resistant in vitro to disinfectants or antibiotics, including amikacin and clarithromycin. For example, even when minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) indicated that an M. abscessus isolate was susceptible to amikacin and clarithromycin, these drugs were only minimally active in biofilms at the highest concentrations tested (Greendyke and Byrd, 2008; Ortiz-Perez et al., 2011). Muñoz-Egea et al. found differences between the MIC and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) in 4 species of RGM, ranging between <100-fold in the case of Mycobacterium mucogenicum exposed to ciprofloxacin, and >100,000-fold in the case of M. abscessus and Mycobacterium peregrinum exposed to clarithromycin (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2015); ciprofloxacin was the most active antibiotic against these biofilms, compared with clarithromycin or amikacin. Further studies have shown the effect of antibiotic therapy in different stages of biofilm development (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2015, 2016b). In these studies, treatment of the biofilm was more effective when antibiotics are added in the early stage of biofilm development, probably because the phenotype of the cells is not fully adapted to biofilm growth.
In an attempt to evaluate mechanisms for these resistance patterns, Ortiz-Pérez et al. examined the permeability of mycobacterial biofilm to different antimicrobials. These authors studied several clinical and laboratory strains and found that antimicrobial permeability features were not species-dependent or related to drug resistance of the biofilm (Ortiz-Perez et al., 2011). Greendyke and Byrd demonstrated that in M. abscessus the metabolic state is essential for the development of resistance (Greendyke and Byrd, 2008). Other mechanisms, including activation of resistance genes [such as inducible methylases, found in many species of mycobacteria (Esteban et al., 2009)] have been hypothesized, but remain unproven.
The implications of biofilm development in the resistance of M. tuberculosis to antimicrobials have been demonstrated (Ojha et al., 2008), although it is not clear how these findings will apply to the treatment of tuberculosis.
New strategies to improve treatment efficacy and outcomes in patients with infections caused by these organisms have been studied. Differences in biofilm development and structure between species may require different approaches, depending on the mycobacteria involved. Muñoz-Egea et al. studied the effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and Tween 80 (two potential antibiofilm molecules), alone and combined with antibiotics, against non-pigmented RGM (NPRGM) biofilms. Tween 80 alters the structural integrity of the membrane, lipids, and proteins (Teixeira et al., 2007), while NAC acts on the polysaccharide matrix of the biofilm, breaking disulfide bridges that link the polysaccharide fibers (Olofsson et al., 2003). Due to the high lipid content of the mycobacterial cell wall and the significant presence of lipids in the extracellular matrix, Tween 80 is more active against mycobacterial biofilm than NAC (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2016b). An increase in antibacterial activity was observed when NAC and Tween 80 were combined with ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, and amikacin. The ultrastructure of biofilms in M. fortuitum, M. chelonae, M. abscessus, and M. smegmatis is also affected by ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, and amikacin combined with antibiofilm agents. In fact, the percentage of dead bacteria is higher with a combination of antibiotics and antibiofilm agents than with antibiotics only (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2016b). This synergistic effect is potentially useful in the prophylaxis or treatment of infections associated with mycobacterial biofilms.
A new antibiofilm strategy is currently under investigation. Methylobacterium sp. is a Gram-negative Alphaproteobacteria usually found in water distribution systems, that, when isolated in biofilms, has been linked with a lower presence of M. avium (Falkinham et al., 2016). In a subsequent study with M. abscessus, Muñoz-Egea et al. showed that Methylobacterium sp. can inhibit M. abscessus biofilm formation, affecting both thickness and surface area. This study also demonstrated that Methylobacterium sp. do not have to be live to inhibit a preformed biofilm of M. abscessus: the addition of a crude extract of autoclaved Methylobacterium sp. inhibited biofilm development (Muñoz-Egea et al., 2016a). This new approach could lead in the future to the discovery of new antibiofilm agents with specific activity against some species of mycobacteria. This approach is potentially of great interest in the treatment of the numerous infections in which biofilm cannot be surgically removed from the patient.
Conclusions
Mycobacterial biofilms constitute a specific field in this line of research and present unique characteristics. The importance of these structures in environmental and clinical settings is beyond doubt. In the clinic, understanding of biofilms is essential for the proper management of many NTM diseases, especially those associated with biomaterials, because these biofilms render the mycobacteria resistant to commonly used antibiotic treatments. New strategies in the management of this disease are called for, especially when infected tissue cannot be removed. The recent discovery of tuberculosis biofilms provides a new perspective to this extremely important disease, and further study of M. tuberculosis biofilms could alter treatment strategies for this entity in the years to come.
Author Contributions
Both authors perform the review of the articles and write the manuscript in the same proportion. JE: supervised all the work and perform the final corrections.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The handling Editor declared a past collaboration with one of the authors JE.
The other authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We want to acknowledge Ms. Heather Hamilton for her help with the English language of the document.
References
Al-Ghamdi, B., Widaa, H. E., Shahid, M. A., Aladmawi, M., Alotaibi, J., Sanei, A. A., et al. (2016). Cardiac implantable electronic device infection due to Mycobacterium species: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Res. Notes 9, 414. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2221-1
Anderson, G. G., and O'Toole, G. A. (2008). Innate and induced resistance mechanisms of bacterial biofilms. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 322, 85–105. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_5
Basaraba, R. J., and Ojha, A. K. (2017). Mycobacterial biofilms: revisiting tuberculosis bacilli in extracellular necrotizing lesions. Microbiol. Spectr. 5:TBTB2-0024-2016. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0024-2016
Benito, N., Franco, M., Ribera, A., Soriano, A., Rodriguez-Pardo, D., Sorlí, L., et al. (2016). Time trends in the aetiology of prosthetic joint infections: a multicentre cohort study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 22, 732.e1–738.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.05.004
Benwill, J. L., and Wallace, R. J. Jr. (2014). Mycobacterium abscessus: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 27, 506–510. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000104
Berbari, E. F., Hanssen, A. D., Duffy, M. C., Steckelberg, J. M., and Osmon, D. R. (1998). Prosthetic joint infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a case series and review of the literature. Am. J Orthop. 27, 219–227.
Bouchiat, C., Saison, J., Boisset, S., Flandrois, J. P., Issartel, B., Dauwalder, O., et al. (2015). Nontuberculous mycobacteria: an underestimated cause of bioprosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2:ofv047. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv047
Brown-Elliott, B. A., and Wallace, R. J. Jr. (2002). Clinical and taxonomic status of pathogenic nonpigmented or late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15, 716–746. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.4.716-746.2002
Caceres, N., Vilaplana, C., Prats, C., Marzo, E., Llopis, I., Valls, J., et al. (2013). Evolution and role of corded cell aggregation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures. Tuberculosis 93, 690–698. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.08.003
Carter, G., Wu, M., Drummond, D. C., and Bermudez, L. E. (2003). Characterization of biofilm formation by clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium. J. Med. Microbiol. 52(Pt 9), 747–752. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05224-0
Celdran, A., Esteban, J., Manas, J., and Granizo, J. J. (2007). Wound infections due to Mycobacterium fortuitum after polypropylene mesh inguinal hernia repair. J. Hosp. Infect. 66, 374–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.006
Ciofu, O., Rojo-Molinero, E., Macia, M. D., and Oliver, A. (2017). Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. APMIS 125, 304–319. doi: 10.1111/apm.12673
Costerton, J. W., Gessey, G. C., and Cheng, K. J. (1978). How bacteria stick. Sci. Am. 238, 86–95. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0178-86
Dubos, R. J., and Davis, B. D. (1946). Factors affecting the growth of Tubercle Bacilli in liquid media. J. Exp. Med. 83, 409–423. doi: 10.1084/jem.83.5.409
Eid, A. J., Berbari, E. F., Sia, I. G., Wengenack, N. L., Osmon, D. R., and Razonable, R. R. (2007). Prosthetic joint infection due to rapidly growing mycobacteria: report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45, 687–694. doi: 10.1086/520982
El Helou, G., Hachem, R., Viola, G. M., El Zakhem, A., Chaftari, A. M., Jiang, Y., et al. (2013a). Management of rapidly growing mycobacterial bacteremia in cancer patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 56, 843–846. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis1032
El Helou, G., Viola, G. M., Hachem, R., Han, X. Y., and Raad, I. I. (2013b). Rapidly growing mycobacterial bloodstream infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 166–174. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70316-X
Esteban, J., Fernández Roblas, R., García Cía, J. I., Zamora, N., and Ortiz, A. (2007). Clinical significance and epidemiology of non-pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria in a university hospital. J. Infect. 54, 135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.02.017
Esteban, J., García-Pedrazuela, M., Muñoz-Egea, M. C., and Alcaide, F. (2012). Current treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteriosis: an update. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 13, 967–986. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.677824
Esteban, J., Martín-de-Hijas, N. S., Kinnari, T. J., Ayala, G., Fernández-Roblas, R., and Gadea, I. (2008). Biofilm development by potentially pathogenic non-pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria. BMC Microbiol. 8:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-184
Esteban, J., and Muñoz-Egea, M. C. (2016). Mycobacterium bovis and other uncommon members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Microbiol. Spectr. 4:TNMI7-0021-2016. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0021-2016
Esteban, J., Martín-de-Hijas, N. Z., García-Almeida, D., Bodas-Sánchez, A., Gadea, I., and Fernandez-Roblas, R. (2009). Prevalence of erm methylase genes in clinical isolates of non-pigmented, rapidly growing mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15, 919–923 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02757.x
Falkinham, J. O. III. (2002). Nontuberculous mycobacteria in the environment. Clin. Chest Med. 23, 529–551. doi: 10.1016/S0272-5231(02)00014-X
Falkinham, J. O. III. (2009). Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107, 356–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04161.x
Falkinham, J. O. III. (2016). Current epidemiologic Trends of the Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM). Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 3, 161–167. doi: 10.1007/s40572-016-0086-z
Falkinham, J. O. III., Williams, M. D., Kwait, R., and Lande, L. (2016). Methylobacterium spp. as an indicator for the presence or absence of Mycobacterium spp. Int. J. Mycobacteriol. 5, 240–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.03.001
Fennelly, K. P., Ojano-Dirain, C., Yang, Q., Liu, L., Lu, L., Progulske-Fox, A., et al. (2016). Biofilm Formation by Mycobacterium abscessus in a lung cavity. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 193, 692–693. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1586IM
Floto, R. A., Olivier, K. N., Saiman, L., Daley, C. L., Herrmann, J. L., Nick, J. A., et al. (2016). US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis: executive summary. Thorax 71, 88–90. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207983
Fux, C. A., Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., and Stoodley, P. (2005). Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13, 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.010
Garvey, M. I., Ashford, R., Bradley, C. W., Bradley, C. R., Martin, T. A., Walker, J., et al. (2016). Decontamination of heater-cooler units associated with contamination by atypical mycobacteria. J. Hosp. Infect. 93, 229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.02.007
Garvey, M. I., Bradley, C. W., and Walker, J. (2017). A year in the life of a contaminated heater-cooler unit with Mycobacterium chimaera? Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 38, 705–711. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.64
Greendyke, R., and Byrd, T. F. (2008). Differential antibiotic susceptibility of Mycobacterium abscessus variants in biofilms and macrophages compared to that of planktonic bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 2019–2026 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00986-07
Griffith, D. E., Aksamit, T., Brown-Elliott, B. A., Catanzaro, A., Daley, C., Gordin, F., et al. (2007). An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 175, 367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST
Gupta, A., and Clauss, H. (2009). Prosthetic joint infection with Mycobacterium avium complex in a solid organ transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 11, 537–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00433.x
Ha, K. Y., Chung, Y. G., and Ryoo, S. J. (2005). Adherence and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis on various spinal implants. Spine 30, 38–43. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000147801.63304.8a
Hakim, A., Hisam, N., and Reuman, P. D. (1993). Environmental mycobacterial peritonitis complicating peritoneal dialysis: three cases and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 16, 426–431. doi: 10.1093/clind/16.3.426
Halloum, I., Carrere-Kremer, S., Blaise, M., Viljoen, A., Bernut, A., Le Moigne, V., et al. (2016). Deletion of a dehydratase important for intracellular growth and cording renders rough Mycobacterium abscessus avirulent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E4228–E4237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605477113
Hall-Stoodley, L., and Stoodley, P. (2005). Biofilm formation and dispersal and the transmission of human pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 13, 7–10. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.004
Hall-Stoodley, L., Stoodley, P., Kathju, S., Hoiby, N., Moser, C., Costerton, J. W., et al. (2012). Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 65, 127–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00968.x
Hoiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Moser, C., Jensen, P. O., Kolpen, M., Qvist, T., et al. (2017). Diagnosis of biofilm infections in cystic fibrosis patients. APMIS 125, 339–343. doi: 10.1111/apm.12689
Hoyle, B. D., and Costerton, J. W. (1991). Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms. Prog. Drug Res. 37, 91–105. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7139-6_2
Islam, M. S., Richards, J. P., and Ojha, A. K. (2012). Targeting drug tolerance in mycobacteria: a perspective from mycobacterial biofilms. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 10, 1055–1066. doi: 10.1586/eri.12.88
Joshi, P., Singh, M., Bhargava, A., and Mehrotra, R. (2013). Autofluorescence–an important ancillary technique for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: revisited. Diagn. Cytopathol. 41, 330–334. doi: 10.1002/dc.21860
Kennedy, B. S., Bedard, B., Younge, M., Tuttle, D., Ammerman, E., Ricci, J., et al. (2012). Outbreak of Mycobacterium chelonae infection associated with tattoo ink. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1020–1024. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205114
Kester, J. C., and Fortune, S. M. (2014). Persisters and beyond: mechanisms of phenotypic drug resistance and drug tolerance in bacteria. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 49, 91–101 doi: 10.3109/10409238.2013.869543
Koch, R. (1982). Classics in infectious diseases. The etiology of tuberculosis: Robert Koch. Berlin, Germany 1882. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4, 1270–1274. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.6.1270
Kohler, P., Kuster, S. P., Bloemberg, G., Schulthess, B., Frank, M., Tanner, F. C., et al. (2015). Healthcare-associated prosthetic heart valve, aortic vascular graft, and disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera infections subsequent to open heart surgery. Eur. Heart J. 36, 2745–2753. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv342
Kulka, K., Hatfull, G., and Ojha, A. K. (2012). Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biofilms. J. Vis. Exp. 15:e3820. doi: 10.3791/3820
Lewis, K. (2008). Multidrug tolerance of biofilms and persister cells. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 322, 107–131. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_6
Löwenstein, E. (1920). Vorlesungen über Bakteriologie, Immunität, spezifische Diagnostik und Therapie der Tuberkulose. Jena: Fischer.
Marciano-Cabral, F., Jamerson, M., and Kaneshiro, E. S. (2010). Free-living amoebae, Legionella and Mycobacterium in tap water supplied by a municipal drinking water utility in the USA. J. Water Health 8, 71–82. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.129
Martin-de-Hijas, N. Z., Garcia-Almeida, D., Ayala, G., Fernandez-Roblas, R., Gadea, I., Celdran, A., et al. (2009). Biofilm development by clinical strains of non-pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15, 931–936 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02882.x
Maya-Hoyos, M., Leguizamón, J., Mariño-Ramírez, L., and Soto, C. Y. (2015). Sliding motility, biofilm formation, and glycopeptidolipid production in Mycobacterium colombiense strains. Biomed Res. Int. 2015:419549. doi: 10.1155/2015/419549
Menozzi, F. D., Rouse, J. H., Alavi, M., Laude-Sharp, M., Muller, J., Bischoff, R., et al. (1996). Identification of a heparin-binding hemagglutinin present in mycobacteria. J. Exp. Med. 184, 993–1001. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.3.993
Meyers, H., Brown-Elliott, B. A., Moore, D., Curry, J., Truong, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2002). An outbreak of Mycobacterium chelonae infection following liposuction. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34, 1500–1507. doi: 10.1086/340399
Muñoz-Egea, M. C., Esteban, M., and Esteban, J. (2016a). “Inhibition of Mycobacterium abscessus biofilms by Methylobacterium sp,” in 29th ECCMI (Amsterdam).
Muñoz-Egea, M. C., Garcia-Pedrazuela, M., Mahillo-Fernandez, I., and Esteban, J. (2016b). Effect of antibiotics and antibiofilm agents in the ultrastructure and development of biofilms developed by nonpigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria. Microb. Drug Resist. 22, 1–6. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2015.0124
Muñoz-Egea, M. C., García-Pedrazuela, M., Mahillo, I., and Esteban, J. (2015). Effect of ciprofloxacin in the ultrastructure and development of biofilms formed by rapidly growing mycobacteria. BMC Microbiol. 15:18 doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0359-y
Muñoz-Egea, M. C., García-Pedrazuela, M., Mahillo, I., García, M. J., and Esteban, J. (2013). Autofluorescence as a tool for structural analysis of biofilms formed by nonpigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 1065–1067. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03149-12
Nayak, N. (2015). Mycobacterium tuberculosis biofilm–a new perspective. Indian J. Tuberc. 62, 4–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2015.02.028
Ojha, A., Anand, M., Bhatt, A., Kremer, L., Jacobs, W. R. Jr., and Hatfull, G. F. (2005). GroEL1: a dedicated chaperone involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis during biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Cell 123, 861–873. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.012
Ojha, A. K., Baughn, A. D., Sambandan, D., Hsu, T., Trivelli, X., Guerardel, Y., et al. (2008). Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biofilms containing free mycolic acids and harbouring drug-tolerant bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 69, 164–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06274.x
Ojha, A. K., Jacobs, W. R. Jr., and Hatfull, G. F. (2015). Genetic dissection of mycobacterial biofilms. Methods Mol. Biol. 1285, 215–226. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2450-9_12
Olofsson, A. C., Hermansson, M., and Elwing, H. (2003). N-acetyl-L-cysteine affects growth, extracellular polysaccharide production, and bacterial biofilm formation on solid surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 4814–4822 doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4814-4822.2003
Ortiz-Perez, A., Martin-de-Hijas, N., Alonso-Rodriguez, N., Molina-Manso, D., Fernandez-Roblas, R., and Esteban, J. (2011). Importance of antibiotic penetration in the antimicrobial resistance of biofilm formed by non-pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria against amikacin, ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 29, 79–84 doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2010.08.016
Ovrutsky, A. R., Chan, E. D., Kartalija, M., Bai, X., Jackson, M., Gibbs, S., et al. (2013). Cooccurrence of free-living amoebae and nontuberculous mycobacteria in hospital water networks, and preferential growth of Mycobacterium avium in Acanthamoeba lenticulata. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 3185–3192. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03823-12
Patino, S., Alamo, L., Cimino, M., Casart, Y., Bartoli, F., Garcia, M. J., et al. (2008). Autofluorescence of mycobacteria as a tool for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 3296–3302. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02183-07
Pierce, C., Dubos, R. J., and Middlebrook, G. (1947). Infection of mice with Tubercle Bacilli grown in tween-albumin liquid medium. J. Exp. Biol. Med. 64:173.
Qvist, T., Eickhardt, S., Kragh, K. N., Andersen, C. B., Iversen, M., Hoiby, N., et al. (2015). Chronic pulmonary disease with Mycobacterium abscessus complex is a biofilm infection. Eur. Respir. J. 46, 1823–1826. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01102-2015
Qvist, T., Pressler, T., Hoiby, N., and Katzenstein, T. L. (2014). Shifting paradigms of nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis. Respir. Res. 15:41. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-41
Recht, J., and Kolter, R. (2001). Glycopeptidolipid acetylation affects sliding motility and biofilm formation in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Bacteriol. 183, 5718–5724. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.19.5718-5724.2001
Recht, J., Martinez, A., Torello, S., and Kolter, R. (2000). Genetic analysis of sliding motility in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Bacteriol. 182, 4348–4351. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.15.4348-4351.2000
Richards, J. P., and Ojha, A. K. (2014). Mycobacterial biofilms. Microbiol. Spectr. 2:MGM2-0004-2013. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MGM2-0004-2013
Ridgway, H. F., Rigby, M. G., and Argo, D. G. (1984). Adhesion of a Mycobacterium sp. to cellulose diacetate membranes used in reverse osmosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 61–67.
Schulze-Robbecke, R., and Fischeder, R. (1989). Mycobacteria in biofilms. Zentralbl. Hyg. Umweltmed. 188, 385–390.
Schulze-Röbbecke, R., Janning, B., and Fischeder, R. (1992). Occurrence of mycobacteria in biofilm samples. Tuber. Lung Dis. 73, 141–144. doi: 10.1016/0962-8479(92)90147-C
Spinner, R. J., Sexton, D. J., Goldner, R. D., and Levin, L. S. (1996). Periprosthetic infections due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with no prior history of tuberculosis. J. Arthroplasty 11, 217–222. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80023-3
Teixeira, P. C., Leite, G. M., Domingues, R. J., Silva, J., Gibbs, P. A., and Ferreira, J. P. (2007). Antimicrobial effects of a microemulsion and a nanoemulsion on enteric and other pathogens and biofilms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 118, 15–19 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.05.008
Tokumoto, J. I., Follansbee, S. E., and Jacobs, R. A. (1995). Prosthetic joint infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: report of three cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21, 134–136. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.1.134
Tortoli, E. (2006). The new mycobacteria: an update. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 48, 159–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00123.x
Tortoli, E. (2014). Microbiological features and clinical relevance of new species of the genus Mycobacterium. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 727–752. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00035-14
Vaerewijck, M. J., Huys, G., Palomino, J. C., Swings, J., and Portaels, F. (2005). Mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems: ecology and significance for human health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29, 911–934. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.02.001
van Ingen, J., Boeree, M. J., Dekhuijzen, P. N., and van Soolingen, D. (2009). Environmental sources of rapid growing nontuberculous mycobacteria causing disease in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15, 888–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03013.x
Vess, R. W., Anderson, R. L., Carr, J. H., Bond, W. W., and Favero, M. S. (1993). The colonization of solid PVC surfaces and the acquisition of resistance to germicides by water micro-organisms. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74, 215–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb03018.x
Vijayaraghavan, R., Chandrashekhar, R., Sujatha, Y., and Belagavi, C. S. (2006). Hospital outbreak of atypical mycobacterial infection of port sites after laparoscopic surgery. J. Hosp. Infect. 64, 344–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.07.021
Walker, J., Moore, G., Collins, S., Parks, S., Garvey, M. I., Lamagni, T., et al. (2017). Microbiological problems and biofilms associated with Mycobacterium chimaera in heater-cooler units used for cardiopulmonary bypass. J. Hosp. Infect. 96, 209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.04.014
Wallace, R. J. Jr. (1987). Nontuberculous mycobacteria and water: a love affair with increasing clinical importance. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 1, 677–686.
Wallace, R. J. Jr., Swenson, J. M., Silcox, V. A., Good, R. C., Tschen, J. A., and Stone, M. S. (1983). Spectrum of disease due to rapidly growing mycobacteria. Rev. Infect. Dis. 5, 657–679. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.4.657
Williams, M. M., Yakrus, M. A., Arduino, M. J., Cooksey, R. C., Crane, C. B., Banerjee, S. N., et al. (2009). Structural analysis of biofilm formation by rapidly and slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2091–2098. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00166-09
Winthrop, K. L., Abrams, M., Yakrus, M., Schwartz, I., Ely, J., Gillies, D., et al. (2002). An outbreak of mycobacterial furunculosis associated with footbaths at a nail salon. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1366–1371. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012643
Wolinsky, E. (1979). Nontuberculous mycobacteria and associated diseases. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 119, 107–159.
Wolinsky, E. (1992). Mycobacterial diseases other than tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15, 1–10. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.1.1
Yamazaki, Y., Danelishvili, L., Wu, M., Hidaka, E., Katsuyama, T., Stang, B., et al. (2006). The ability to form biofilm influences Mycobacterium avium invasion and translocation of bronchial epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 8, 806–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00667.x
Zambrano, M. M., and Kolter, R. (2005). Mycobacterial biofilms: a greasy way to hold it together. Cell 123, 762–764. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.011
Keywords: Mycobacterium, biofilms, antimicrobial resistance, in vitro study, review, rapidly growing mycobacteria, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium complex
Citation: Esteban J and García-Coca M (2018) Mycobacterium Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 8:2651. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02651
Received: 28 August 2017; Accepted: 19 December 2017;
Published: 18 January 2018.
Edited by:
Sara María Soto, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, SpainReviewed by:
Brian Weinrick, Trudeau Institute, United StatesPaul Cos, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Copyright © 2018 Esteban and García-Coca. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jaime Esteban, amVzdGViYW5tb3Jlbm9AZ21haWwuY29t