Courtney R. A. Toth
Lisa M. Gieg- Petroleum Microbiology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Biodegradation of crude oil in subsurface petroleum reservoirs has adversely impacted most of the world's oil, converting this resource to heavier forms that are of lower quality and more challenging to recover. Oil degradation in deep reservoir environments has been attributed to methanogenesis over geological time, yet our understanding of the processes and organisms mediating oil transformation in the absence of electron acceptors remains incomplete. Here, we sought to identify hydrocarbon activation mechanisms and reservoir-associated microorganisms that may have helped shape the formation of biodegraded oil by incubating oilfield produced water in the presence of light (°API = 32) or heavy crude oil (°API = 16). Over the course of 17 months, we conducted routine analytical (GC, GC-MS) and molecular (PCR/qPCR of assA and bssA genes, 16S rRNA gene sequencing) surveys to assess microbial community composition and activity changes over time. Over the incubation period, we detected the formation of transient hydrocarbon metabolites indicative of alkane and alkylbenzene addition to fumarate, corresponding with increases in methane production and fumarate addition gene abundance. Chemical and gene-based evidence of hydrocarbon biodegradation under methanogenic conditions was supported by the enrichment of hydrocarbon fermenters known to catalyze fumarate addition reactions (e.g., Desulfotomaculum, Smithella), along with syntrophic bacteria (Syntrophus), methanogenic archaea, and several candidate phyla (e.g., “Atribacteria”, “Cloacimonetes”). Our results reveal that fumarate addition is a possible mechanism for catalyzing the methanogenic biodegradation of susceptible saturates and aromatic hydrocarbons in crude oil, and we propose the roles of community members and candidate phyla in our cultures that may be involved in hydrocarbon transformation to methane in crude oil systems.
Introduction
Methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation is the leading model to explain the widespread occurrence of biodegraded oils and gas formation in oxidant-free reservoirs, whereby lighter oil components (e.g., saturates and aromatic hydrocarbons) are transformed to heavier forms that are of lower quality and more challenging to recover (Head et al., 2003, 2014; Larter et al., 2008). In microbiologically-active reservoirs (<80°C), biogeochemical estimates of hydrocarbon degradation to methane average on the order of 10−3-10−4 kg/m2/year at the oil-water interface (Head et al., 2003; Larter et al., 2006), impacting close to 840,000 barrels of crude oil annually1 Though most studies have focused on the degradation of single model hydrocarbon substrates (reviewed by Foght, 2008; Rabus et al., 2016), the number of reports detailing the susceptibility of whole crude oil to methanogenic biodegradation has surged in recent years (e.g., Townsend et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2008; Feisthauer et al., 2010; Gieg et al., 2010; Gray et al., 2011; Siegert et al., 2011; Mbadinga et al., 2012; Aitken et al., 2013; Sherry et al., 2013, 2014; Tan et al., 2013; Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014; Bian et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2015; Liang et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2016). In particular, linear alkanes (e.g., Zengler et al., 1999; Anderson and Lovley, 2000; Gray et al., 2011; Liang et al., 2015; Tan et al., 2015b) and alkyl-substituted aromatics (e.g., Grbić-Galić and Vogel, 1987; Edwards and Grbić-Galić, 1994; Beller and Edwards, 2000; Washer and Edwards, 2007; Berdugo-Clavijo et al., 2012; Fowler et al., 2012, 2014) have been shown to be the most readily biodegradable hydrocarbon molecules in crude oil and in other fuel mixtures under methanogenic conditions.
Research in the past two decades has demonstrated fumarate addition as a possible anaerobic activation mechanism for n-alkanes and alkyl-substituted aromatics (Beller and Spormann, 1997; Annweiler et al., 2000; Beller and Edwards, 2000; Kropp et al., 2000; Rabus et al., 2001; Kniemeyer et al., 2003; Rios-Hernandez et al., 2003; Wilkes et al., 2003; Cravo-Laureau et al., 2005; Davidova et al., 2005). While this mechanism of hydrocarbon activation has been characterized using isolates, fumarate addition has also been shown to occur in mixed anaerobic hydrocarbon-degrading cultures (Foght, 2008; Rabus et al., 2016). Genes for fumarate addition enzymes (e.g., ass/mas encoding alkylsuccinate synthase for alkanes or bss encoding benzylsuccinate synthase for alkylbenzenes) have been detected in numerous methanogenic oil-degrading enrichment cultures (e.g., Zhou et al., 2012; Aitken et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2013; Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014) and in hydrocarbon-containing environments (e.g., Callaghan et al., 2010; An et al., 2013; von Netzer et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2015; Stagars et al., 2016), but their overall importance to the biotransformation of crude oil in situ is not clear. Recent investigations have begun to assess the prevalence of anaerobic hydrocarbon-degrading mechanisms including fumarate addition in methanogenic crude oil systems by combining metabolite profiling and targeted functional gene analysis approaches. In one example, Aitken et al. (2013) performed a 686-day time-course experiment comparing the degradation of crude oil alkanes under sulfate-reducing and methanogenic conditions. While the authors detected an accumulation of (1-methylalkyl) succinates over time in sulfate-reducing cultures (corresponding with an increase in assA/masD gene abundance), no such evidence was observed in parallel methanogenic replicates (relative to controls). This led Aitken et al. (2013) to postulate that an alternate pathway may be responsible for alkane activation under methanogenic conditions. A similar proposal was also made for a denitrifying n-hexadecane-degrading enrichment culture and by certain strains of sulfate-reducing bacteria such as Hxd3 (Callaghan et al., 2006, 2009). In contrast, Bian et al. (2015) obtained extensive metabolic and functional evidence of fumarate addition to alkanes from production fluids collected from three methanogenic oil fields, coinciding with the recovery of more than a dozen unique assA/masD gene sequences. Other putative hydrocarbon activation mechanisms include carboxylation, hydroxylation, or methylation, all of which have been reported to occur under other anaerobic electron-accepting conditions (Foght, 2008; Widdel et al., 2010).
Overall, a better understanding of the mechanisms and microbial consortia catalyzing the methanogenic attack of susceptible crude oil components is needed to help understand the metabolic processes governing heavy oil formation in petroleum reservoirs. Time course metabolic experiments, such as those conducted by Aitken et al. (2013), can help offer valuable insight into characterizing potentially transient microbial processes catalyzing crude oil biodegradation (more so than in single time-point experiments). Our research group previously demonstrated that the conversion of crude oil to methane was possible using a produced water consortium from a heavy oil field as an inoculum; single-time point chemical and assA gene analysis suggested fumarate addition as a possible mechanism of alkane activation (Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014). In the present study, we build upon this preliminary observation by examining methanogenic crude oil biodegradation in a time course-dependent manner (using produced water from the same oil field) to better understand the chemical, functional, and microbial community dynamics of oilfield consortia involved in this metabolic process. Based on widespread evidence that fumarate addition catalyzes the activation of model hydrocarbon substrates (e.g., saturates, aromatics) under all anoxic conditions, we hypothesized that fumarate addition is a prevalent microbial process used by diverse methanogenic reservoir-associated microorganisms when susceptible hydrocarbons are present in crude oil.
Materials and Methods
Sampling Site Description and Sample Collection
To prepare the inoculum for this study, produced water was obtained from five production wells (PW; 4-PW, 7-PW, 18-PW, 32-PW, 33-PW; Figure S1) in the Medicine Hat Glauconitic C (MHGC) field (Voordouw et al., 2009). Although this oilfield has been used as a study site for nitrate treatment of souring for 10 years (Suri et al., 2017), previous investigations of this oilfield have reported chemical and functional evidence of nitrate-free “zones” harboring active methanogenic archaea (Agrawal et al., 2012), from which all PW samples were collected for this study. Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg (2014) also demonstrated that methanogenic crude oil biodegradation could be established from these produced waters. No detectable amounts of nitrate or sulfate, and only low concentrations of sulfide (0.05 mM), nitrite (0.01 mM), and ammonium (0.39 mM) were measured in the produced water samples (methods described in Voordouw et al., 2009). Therefore, we determined that the overall risk of nitrate/nitrite inhibition of methanogenesis was low and that PW samples could be used to study methanogenic crude oil biodegradation.
Samples were collected on May 20th, 2015 in 1-L Nalgene bottles filled to the brim to minimize oxygen ingress during transportation. Upon arrival in the lab, samples were stored in an anaerobic chamber (10% CO2/90% N2) at room temperature. Most samples contained 5–10% heavy oil (v/v), which was separated from the produced water by centrifugation (25,000 × gav for 20 min). Recovered oil samples were combined and stored anaerobically at 4°C prior to use. The crude oil was not sterilized before use, but this appeared to have no effect on control (sterile) incubations established in this study as no methane was produced from sterile controls.
Establishment of Light and Heavy Oil-Degrading Produced Water Cultures
Oil-free produced water from all five PW samples was combined in equal ratios and 500 mL aliquots were dispensed into five sterile, custom-made glass vessels. Each bottle was outfitted with two Balch tube ports; one near the neck of a 1-L Schott flask and the second near its base (in the aqueous phase); the neck of the bottle was also sealed in glass to create an air-tight container (Figure S2). This design allowed for routine sampling of the headspace and culture fluids, respectively, without disturbing the oil-water transition zone. Cultures were amended with either a light oil (°API = 32) or MHGC heavy oil (°API = 16) in excess (20 mL) before sealing microcosms with butyl rubber stoppers and aluminum crimps. The intent of our experiment was not to completely biodegrade all susceptible crude oil components, but rather to observe the microorganisms and processes responding to amendment with either oil source. Cultures were incubated at MHGC reservoir temperatures (30°C) under dark and static conditions for 17 months. Note here that no supplemental growth medium, reducing agents or other culturing agents were added to cultures so as best to simulate the minimal nutrient availability of this particular reservoir. Due to the limited volumes of PW fluids collected during the sampling trip, only one live replicate was prepared per oil type so as to ensure that adequate sterile (autoclaved) replicates (one for each oil type) and an oil-free control (incubated for 21 months) could also be established.
Chemical Analyses
During the incubation period, microcosm headspaces were routinely monitored for methane production by gas chromatography (GC; Fowler et al., 2012). Additionally, cultures were subsampled in duplicate (2 × 25 mL) at designated time points (after 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 17 months) for chemical (metabolites) and DNA analyses. Following a centrifugation step (30,000 × gav), supernatants were acidified with 6 M HCl (pH < 2) and extracted and analyzed for putative hydrocarbon metabolites as silylated compounds by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) following the procedure outlined by Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg (2014). Putative hydrocarbon metabolites from silylated organic extracts were positively identified using MSD ChemStation software (version E.02.02.1431; Agilent Technologies) and by matching GC retention times and MS profiles to authentic standards purchased from Sigma Aldrich (97 – ≥99.5% purity) or that were chemically synthesized. Alkyl-substituted benzylsuccinic acids were made using the reflux reaction procedure described by Bickford et al. (1948), while an authentic standard of n-octylsuccinic acid was prepared by base hydrolysis (Kropp et al., 2000). Calibration curves of representative TMS-derivatized standards were used to quantify detectable (≥10 nM) hydrocarbon metabolites of interest (Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014).
End point crude oil subsamples (1 mL) were collected from oil-amended cultures and sterile controls for hydrocarbon analysis. Though quantifying the extent of crude oil biodegradation was not a goal of our experiment, we were still interested in screening samples for any measurable hydrocarbon losses. Crude oil samples were diluted 1:10 in dichloromethane and analyzed in triplicate by GC-MS as described by Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg (2014). Hydrocarbon loss was determined as a function of alkane or aromatic hydrocarbon to pristane or phenanthrene peak area ratios, respectively, as these components naturally present in both crude oils were deemed to be recalcitrant to degradation.
Hydrocarbon Activation Gene Analysis
Pelleted cells from subsampled culture fluids were extracted for genomic DNA using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soils (MP Biomedicals) and normalized to a concentration of 0.5 ng/μL. Each DNA extract was then probed for the presence of anaerobic hydrocarbon activation genes using a series of established primer sets and thermocycling conditions (Table 1). All PCR reactions (25 μL) were prepared with 12.5 μL 2x Master Mix (Fermentas; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.5 μL of each forward primer and corresponding reverse primer (10 μM), and 1 μL of template DNA. Purified amplicons of expected size were cloned using a commercial kit (TOPO TA; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and sent to Eurofins Genomics (Eurofins MWG Operon LLC, Huntsville, AL, USA) for Sanger sequencing. Trimmed consensus sequences of correct identity were queried against the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide database using BLASTn to identify homology to known sequences, and used to build bootstrapped maximum likelihood trees (500 replicates) in MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016). Retrieved hydrocarbon activation gene sequences were deposited in GenBank and are available under the accession numbers MG460804–MG460820.
Table 1. Amplification results for primer sets screened for targeted functional gene analysis of oil-amended produced water cultures.
Quantification of Fumarate Addition Genes
To capture and quantify as many fumarate addition genes (in the produced water cultures) as possible in a single assay, non-degenerate primers MHGC_bssAf (GACGACGGCTGCATGGA) and MHGC_bssAr (GCCTTCCCAGTTGGCGTA) targeting bssA were designed from aligned gene sequences retrieved from this study. Primer specificity was verified in Primer-BLAST (Ye et al., 2012), and PCR/qPCR products obtained using the non-degenerate primers (~708 bp) were cloned and sequenced to confirm that they targeted the correct gene. bssA gene abundance in technical duplicate DNA samples was determined in relation to calibration standards from a 10-fold dilution series (109-101 gene copies per μL) of PCR amplified bssA clones obtained in this study. qPCR reactions comprised SsoFast Evagreen Supermix (5 μL), PCR primers (1 μL of 10 pmoles/μL each), RNAse-free water (3 μL), and DNA template (1 μL), and were carried out using a BioRad CFX96 thermocycler as followed; an initial denaturation step (5 min at 94°C), up to 40 cycles of 1 min at 94°C and 1 min at 59.5 °C, and melt curve analysis (65–95°C with an increase of 0.5°C every 5 s). The efficiency in qPCR reactions of primer set MHGC bssA ranged between 95 and 105%, with R2-values for calibration curves >0.99. Reactions yielded a single amplification product, and log gene-abundance values for samples all fell within the linear range of the standard calibration. Gene abundances were also queried for the oil-free and sterile control DNA extracts. A similar procedure was attempted to design qPCR primers for assA, but they failed to amplify the target gene above threshold (quantifiable) levels; only in positive control tests was the expected quantification observed. We experienced the same problem when using established primer sets assA2Fq/assA2Rq described by Aitken et al. (2013).
Microbial Community Analysis
Amplification and Illumina sequencing of extracted DNA was carried out by a two-step method targeting the V6-V8 regions of the 16S rRNA gene using universal primers 926Fi5 (TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGAAACTYAAKGAATTGACGG) and 1392Ri7 (GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGACGGGCGGTGTGTRC). In the first round of PCR, reactions (25 μL) contained 12.5 μL 2x PCR Master Mix (Fermentas), 5 μL of each primer (1 μM) and 2.5 μL of gDNA template. PCR assays were performed using a three-step thermoprofile previously shown to obtain high amplicon yields from low concentrations of DNA (Klindworth et al., 2013): initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; 25 cycles of 95°C (40 s), 55.0°C (2 min), 72.0°C (1 min); final extension at 72°C for 7 min. In the second round of PCR, indices were added to amplicon ends using Nextera XT Index Kit primers (P5-S50X-OHAF and P7-N7XX-OHAF; Illumina). Reaction volumes were increased to 50 μL and contained 25 μL 2x PCR Master Mix, 5 μL of each primer (1 μM) and 10 μL of purified PCR I amplicon. Reaction conditions were modified from round I PCR: 95°C 3 min; 8 cycles of 95°C (30 s), 55.0°C (30 s), 72.0°C (30 s); 72°C 5 min. Amplicons of expected length were confirmed on a 1% agarose gel, purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic bead system (Beckman Coulter), and sequenced using the 300PE (paired-end) MiSeq protocol at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary.
Read assembly and 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis were performed in QIIME (version 1.9.1; Caporaso et al., 2010). Prior to assembly, reads were visually inspected in DADA2 (Callahan et al., 2016) and trimmed of low-quality ends. Reads were merged with a 50 bp overlap with ≤10% allowed mismatches, and subjected to additional quality control steps such as the removal of chimeras, ambiguities and sequences with an average quality score of less than 20. The final reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% species cutoff and classified against the SSU SILVA 119 database (Quast et al., 2013). The average read abundance of technical duplicates was used to profile microbial community compositions over time. Merged sequence reads were deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Short Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA417121 and accession numbers SAMN07977243–SAMN07977267.
Results
Methanogenic Activity on Light and Heavy Crude Oil
Methane production was monitored following the establishment of two crude oil-amended incubations prepared from heavy oil reservoir produced water (Figure 1). The incubation amended with light oil produced near identical amounts of CH4 (1307 μmol) as the heavy oil-amended incubation (1352 μmol) in uniform rates across the 525-day incubation period (0.14 μmol CH4/day/g of light oil vs. 0.13 μmol CH4/day/g of heavy oil). The only deviation in CH4 production was in the first 60 days of incubation, where an apparent lag phase was observed in the light oil incubation.
Figure 1. Methane production from produced water-derived incubations enriched on light (blue squares) and heavy (red circles) oil relative to an unamended control (black triangles).
Over the course of the 17-month incubation period, we identified and quantified various compounds in both oil-amended cultures that were not present in the oil-free and sterile controls (Figure 2; Table S1). The average concentration of hydrocarbon metabolites in the oil-amended cultures peaked between 2 and 4 months of incubation, and included compounds with mass spectral profiles indicative of C1-C9 alkane fumarate addition (alkylsuccinates) and aromatic compound biodegradation (e.g., benzoate, toluates, 2-methylnaphthoate, cyclohexane carboxylate). No fumarate addition products for aromatic hydrocarbons could be detected in either culture at any time point. Generally, the concentration of aromatic acids detected in the light oil-amended culture was greater than in the heavy oil-amended culture (Figure 2). Trace amounts of C1-C4 alkylsuccinates (0.07–0.44 μM) were also predominantly detected in the light oil culture (Figures 2, 3). Interestingly, we identified a total of four peaks in the light oil-amended culture with MS fragment ions corresponding to propane or butane fumarate addition products (two each), suggesting that hydrocarbon activation was occurring at both the primary and secondary carbon atom (Figure 3; Kniemeyer et al., 2007). The mass spectral pattern of the putative n-propylsuccinate aligns with a previously published reference standard (Savage et al., 2010), but does require verification with an authentic standard in our laboratory. At T8 and T12, the concentration of most alkylsuccinates was below detectable limits (≤10 nM), and cumulative aromatic/other hydrocarbon metabolites also decreased to 2.6–7.6 μM; up to 52 times less than concentrations observed at T2 and T4 (Figure 2). Select metabolites were again detected by the end of the incubation period.
Figure 2. Time-resolved quantification of alkylsuccinic acids and aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites detected in the (A) light and (B) heavy oil-amended cultures. Characteristic ion fragments m/z 262 and (M – 15)+ were selected to probe and integrate TMS-derivatized alkylsuccinates and organic components, respectively. Identification and quantification of metabolites was performed using calibration curves prepared from authentic standards.
Figure 3. Detection of putative alkylsuccinates in oil-amended produced water cultures. (A) A portion of a GC total ion chromatogram showing larger peaks diagnostic of C1-C4 alkylsuccinates in the light oil culture (black) than in the heavy oil culture (red); peaks were not detected in the unamended control (not shown). (B) Mass spectral profiles indicative of propane and butane fumarate addition products at both the primary and secondary carbon atoms (shown as trimethylsilyl derivatives).
Triplicate oil samples from each oil-amended microcosm were recovered and assessed by GC-MS analysis after 17 months of incubation. Measurable losses of C7-C8 n-alkanes (47–79%), cyclohexane (22–71%), and some alkyl-substituted aromatic hydrocarbons were observed in oil-amended cultures as compared to sterile controls (Figure S3). The loss of these hydrocarbons corresponded well with hydrocarbon metabolites detected in the organic extracts (Figure 2). Other hydrocarbons detected in the incubations did not decrease in abundance relative to their corresponding sterile control (Figure S3), which we attribute to amending microcosms with an excess of oil.
Detection of Fumarate Addition Genes
Twenty established primer sets targeting anaerobic hydrocarbon activation genes were used to probe genomic DNA from the light- and heavy oil-amended cultures. Of these, 11 sets of primers could amplify assA or bssA gene fragments present in one or both cultures in at least one time point sample (Table 1), with the most amplification observed using primer sets 7772f/8546r (Winderl et al., 2007) and FAE-B (von Netzer et al., 2013). Purified and cloned amplicons of target genes were sequenced to determine the taxonomic affiliation of each PCR product and to assess the diversity of putative hydrocarbon degraders in each culture. In all, 3 unique assA and 14 bssA gene fragments were retrieved across both oil-degrading microcosms; PCR products for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) activation genes (nms encoding for naphthylmethylsuccinate synthase and ncr encoding for naphthyl-coenzyme A reductase) were not obtained at any time point.
Maximum likelihood trees of the recovered fumarate addition gene fragments revealed that all assA gene sequences clustered within a Smithella subclade predominantly enriched from alkane and/or crude oil substrates, whereas bssA sequences were distributed within a largely uncharacterized clade (Figure 4). The bssA clade was phylogenetically distinct from published fumarate addition gene sequences belonging to cultured aromatic hydrocarbon degraders (<77% sequence similarity), thus we assessed their taxonomic affiliations to previously characterized enrichment cultures and environmental strains. We found that the bssA gene fragments retrieved from the oil-degrading cultures shared 90–91% sequence similarity to a presumed Desulfotomaculum sp. previously recovered from a methanogenic toluene-degrading enrichment culture (Bacterium bssA-1; Edwards and Grbić-Galić, 1994; Washer and Edwards, 2007). Our bssA gene fragments also clustered closely (92 – 99% sequence similarity) to several uncultured prokaryotic clones recovered from the Mildred Lake Settling Basin, a tailings pond located in Northern Alberta, Canada, from which materials were used to establish a series of hydrocarbon-degrading enrichment cultures (e.g., Siddique et al., 2006, 2007, 2011; Tan et al., 2013, 2015a).
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood tree showing the affiliation of recovered assA and bssA gene fragments (this study, light oil in blue and heavy oil in red) with previously published reference strains, enrichment cultures, and environmental samples. Evolutionary analyses of aligned nucleotide sequences were conducted in MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016); the consensus tree was constructed using the Tamura–Nei model (Tamura and Masatoshi, 1993) at all nucleotide positions (for a total of 481 positions in the final dataset) and performing 500 bootstrap replicates (values below 50% are not shown). Pyruvate formate lyase (pfl) sequences were used as an outgroup (collapsed in figure).
Time-Resolved Quantification of Fumarate Addition Genes
To gain a better understanding of assA and bssA activity in the oil-degrading cultures, fumarate addition gene abundances were estimated over time by qPCR analysis. Though we were able to detect assA genes in the previously mentioned PCR assays, we were unable to quantify them using published qPCR primers (Aitken et al., 2013) and experimental primers; only positive control tests yielded a quantifiable amplicon product. Consequently, changes in assA gene abundance over time could not be evaluated. It is not known whether the abundance of assA is indeed below detectable limits (<101 gene copies/μL), or if the primers selected failed to capture all phylotypes present in the DNA extracts.
In contrast, bssA gene fragments were successfully quantified over the 17-month incubation period. Gene abundances were below detectable limits at T0, but became enriched after only 1 month of incubation (Figure 5). In the light oil culture, bssA gene abundances increased > 25-fold between T4 and T8, and continued to increase up to a maximum of 6.92 × 105 copies/μL (Figure 5A). While bssA gene abundances in the heavy oil culture also increased during the first 8 months of incubation, values decreased by 70% over the remaining incubation period (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. Change in bssA gene abundances over time in the (A) light and (B) heavy oil-amended produced water cultures.
Microbial Community Dynamics in Methanogenic Cultures
Time-resolved sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments was carried out to compare microbial community dynamics in response to amendment with light and heavy oil (Figure 6, Table 2). Both the light and heavy oil cultures saw substantial shifts in microbial community composition during the 17-month incubation under simulated reservoir conditions: many of these shifts were similar across each culture, but distinctions were also evident. The most apparent increase in abundance over time was seen within the Firmicutes and Euryarchaeota phyla, comprising 60 and 74% of quality sequence reads in both oil-amended cultures by T17, respectively (Figure 6). This represented a 20- to 25-fold increase in abundance from reported T0 values, which collectively had comprised less than 3% of total reads (Figure 6). Members of the Firmicutes were dominated by the enrichment of a single OTU affiliated with Desulfotomaculum after T4, making up to 30.5% of reads by the end of the 17-month incubation period (Table 2). This OTU shared >97% sequence similarity to an uncultured Peptococcaceae bacterium clone recovered from the Mildred Lake Settling Basin (accession no. EU22655; Siddique et al., 2012); a bacterium thought to participate in methanogenic hydrocarbon biodegradation. This trend also closely mirrored the increase in bssA gene abundances over time, particularly in the light oil-amended culture (Figure 5). Thus, it is plausible that (at least some of) the bssA gene sequences retrieved from our cultures belong to Desulfotomaculum and/or the Peptococcaceae family. Other members of the Firmicutes were also enriched (though to a lesser extent) during the first 4 months of incubation, including Dethiosulfatibacter (up to 8.8% of light oil reads) and Moorella (up to 10.0% of heavy oil reads), but their relative abundance decreased to <0.1% immediately afterwards (Table 2). Methanogenic Euryarchaeota became enriched after the first month of incubation and proliferated up to 39.1–43.3% of total reads by T17 (Figure 6), including hydrogenotrophic (Methanocalculus, Methanoculleus, and Methanolinea) and acetotrophic (Methanosaeta) representatives (Table 2). Though the ratios of methanogens are similar between both cultures, a greater proportion of reads belonging to Methanocalculus were enriched over time in light oil-amended samples, whereas Methanolinea was up to three times as prevalent in the presence of heavy oil at T17. Other putative hydrocarbon fermenters and/or hydrocarbon degradation-associated bacteria were detected during the incubation period, including microorganisms affiliated with the Peptococcaecae, Anaerolineaceae, or Syntrophaceae families (averaging 2.5% of reads; Table 2). We also detected an OTU belonging to Smithella (up to 6.1% of reads), but unlike Desulfotomaculum, its read abundance declined after 4 months of incubation. Several of the T0 reservoir-associated OTUs, consisting primarily of Proteobacteria, were reduced to <0.5% of reads after just the first month of incubation (includes members of the Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria), while others saw a more gradual decrease in abundance over time (e.g., Deltaproteobacteria, Deferribacteres; Figure 6; Table 2).
Figure 6. Microbial community composition of methanogenic crude oil-degrading produced water cultures over time at the phylum level based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Table 2. Distribution of the 25 most abundant classified taxa (%) across both methanogenic crude oil-degrading produced water cultures over 17 months of incubation, as determined by Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene.
Other OTUs predominantly affiliated with known protein/or organic acid scavengers (e.g., Pelobacter, Bacteroidales) saw a rapid increase in abundance (up to 39.4% of reads) at T1, and immediately declining afterwards (Table 2). Interestingly, three candidate phyla were enriched at different times during the incubation period. Most notably, the proliferation of “Atribacteria” (formerly OP9/JS1) paralleled that of Desulfotomaculum, increasing by up to 7.0–9.1% over 17 months (Figure 6; Table 2). In contrast, the enrichment of “Cloacimonetes” (WWE1) peaked near T8, and “Marinimicrobia” (SAR406) remained between 1.1 and 5.1% abundance after T0 (Figure 6; Table 2).
Discussion
Crude oil degradation in deep reservoir environments over geological time has been attributed to methanogenesis, a process that still requires a deeper understanding. Here we assessed the functional and microbial community response of an oilfield produced water consortium over time following exposure to light or heavy oil. Our cultures were found to behave similarly to amendment with either crude oil source, whereby fermentative bacteria (e.g., Desulfotomaculum, Smithella) were found to catalyze the activation of susceptible low molecular weight hydrocarbons (e.g., short-chain n-alkanes, cyclohexane and monoaromatic hydrocarbons) via addition to fumarate. This study shows that fumarate addition is a possible activation mechanism to catalyze crude oil biodegradation by reservoir-associated microorganisms, building on initial reports of methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation from the MHGC field (Agrawal et al., 2012; Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014) and microbial communities enriched from other oilfield fluids (Jones et al., 2008; Gieg et al., 2010; Mbadinga et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2012; Cheng et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2013).
The detection of enhanced methane production in each oil-amended culture relative to the oil-unamended control (Figure 1), in addition to the increase in abundance of methanogenic archaea over time (Figure 6), shows that the MHGC field continues to harbor methanogenic hydrocarbon-degrading microbial communities (Agrawal et al., 2012; Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014) despite its history of nitrate treatment for souring (Voordouw et al., 2009; Suri et al., 2017). Though this does not rule out the possibly that methanogenesis has been (at least) partially impacted by nitrate/nitrite over time, nitrate treatment has not prevented methanogenic crude oil biodegradation from occurring in our culture experiments. We remark that experimental rates of methane production from crude oil were 30–60 times slower than in a previous study examining methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation using MHGC production water (Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014). However, a key difference is that nutrients (including 1 mM phosphate) were added in the previous work, while in the present study no additional nutrients were added. Thus, lower nutrient availability may partially explain the slower rates of methane production. Volatile hydrocarbons present in light oils (e.g., n-C5–n-C10 alkanes, methylcyclohexane, benzene, toluene, and xylenes) are known to partially inhibit methanogenic hydrocarbon biodegradation (Sherry et al., 2014) and may have contributed to the 2-month lag in methane production seen in the light oil culture, but had no apparent long-term effect (Figure 1).
The detection of known anaerobic hydrocarbon metabolites (including fumarate addition products) offers convincing evidence that biodegradation processes are occurring in anoxic environments, and can provide clues as to the mechanism(s) responsible for their transformation (Gieg and Suflita, 2002; Gieg and Toth, 2017). Using a combined approach of metabolite analysis and targeted functional gene analysis in a time-dependent fashion, we present evidence that fumarate addition is a possible mechanism of hydrocarbon activation by MHGC-associated microbial community members, and that methanogenic degradation of low molecular weight n-alkanes (≤C8), monoaromatic hydrocarbons, and possibly cyclic alkanes was occurring simultaneously in each culture. Further, this study demonstrates the importance of using a combined, time-dependent approach of metabolite and biodegradation gene analysis in order to compensate for detection and specificity limitations in chemical and molecular assays. For example, conducting qPCR of bssA (detection limit of 101 copies/μL) demonstrated an increase in abundance of this fumarate addition gene involved in alkylaromatic metabolism as methanogenesis progressed (Figures 1, 5), although the requisite benzylsuccinates could not be detected (<10 nM). Similarly, alkylsuccinates diagnostic of saturated alkane activation could be detected in the cultures and assA gene(s) could be detected in the cultures (Figures 3, 4), although a qPCR assay could not be devised to quantify the requisite assA gene above detection levels. Similar anomalies have been reported in other studies that aimed to demonstrated anaerobic hydrocarbon metabolism (Beller et al., 2008; Aitken et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2015), underlining the importance of utilizing a multi-pronged approach in order to garner evidence for anoxic hydrocarbon-degrading metabolic processes in environmental samples.
An accumulation of hydrocarbon metabolites (e.g., alkylsuccinates, aromatic acids) was observed by the second month of incubation, and persisted for at least 2 months before decreasing to trace- or below-detectable amounts (Figure 2). We propose that the accumulation of metabolites was due to the microbial community adaption from predominantly denitrifiers (maintained by nitrate injection in the MHGC oil field, e.g., uncultured Rhodocyclaceae and Thauera; Agrawal et al., 2012) to predominantly methanogenic consortia (Figure 6; Table 2), requiring several months of incubation before active syntrophic hydrocarbon degradation finally proceeded. Research groups have typically assessed enrichment cultures for hydrocarbon metabolites well after methanogenic activity has already been established (e.g., Aitken et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2013; Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014), when these intermediates are being or have been rapidly consumed. This approach can make it difficult to detect putative hydrocarbon metabolites using standard GC-MS approaches, as seen by Aitken et al. (2013), especially when extracting small culture volumes. Thus, it may be a better approach to look for metabolites early in a time-course experiment, when metabolites appear to be at their highest concentrations (Figure 2). It is not clear why some metabolites appear to re-accumulate over time, but this may be due to natural fluctuations in the community composition impacting the abundance and/or metabolic activity of fermentative (syntrophic) partners (e.g., Smithella, Syntrophus), which we found to be dynamic throughout the time course experiment (Table 2). The quantitative significance of such Syntrophaceae, particularly in methanogenic alkane-degrading communities, has been a topic of interest in recent years (e.g., Gray et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2013; Embree et al., 2013; Wawrik et al., 2016). For example, Fowler et al. (2014) proposed a Syntrophus sp. to be a key secondary syntroph in the methanogenic toluene-degrading culture TOLDC, consuming the intermediate benzoic acid produced by a Desulfosporosinus sp., but at a slower rate. This might also explain why downstream metabolites of aromatic hydrocarbon degradation could be detected in each oil-amended culture, but not a fumarate addition product corresponding to bssA genes recovered from extracted DNA (Figures 2–4). Interestingly, we obtained putative mass spectral evidence that the short chain n-alkanes propane and butane present in the light oil culture underwent hemolytic C-H bond cleavage by addition to fumarate at the C2 or terminal carbon position (Figure 3). This has been reported in a few other instances by microbiota enriched or isolated (strain BuS5) from hydrocarbon seeps (Kniemeyer et al., 2007; Savage et al., 2010) or in production fluids (Bian et al., 2015; Gruner et al., 2017). Fumarate addition has also been reported to occur to a lesser extent at C3 for larger alkanes (Rabus et al., 2001), though it has been hypothesized that n-alkylsuccinates are formed accidentally during fumarate addition rather than as true intermediates (Rabus et al., 2001; Jarling et al., 2015).
Phylogenetic and functional gene evidence indicates that Desulfotomaculum is a key alkyl-substituted aromatic hydrocarbon degrader in each oil-amended culture (Figures 4–6; Table 2), a phylotype previously detected in MHGC produced water enriched on a light oil (°API = 37; Berdugo-Clavijo and Gieg, 2014) but at a lower abundance (3.3% of reads after 10 months of incubation). Members of the genus Desulfotomaculum can be metabolically versatile. They are commonly found in the subsurface biosphere through culture-based and molecular approaches, and have been found to participate in the degradation of alkanes (Kniemeyer et al., 2007; Cheng et al., 2013), aromatic hydrocarbons (Ficker et al., 1999; Morasch et al., 2004; Abu Laban et al., 2009; Berlendis et al., 2010; Selesi et al., 2010), and biphenyl (Selesi and Meckenstock, 2009). Though commonly known as sulfate-reducers, some species are capable of oxidizing various substrates (e.g., carbohydrates, organic acids and H2, among others) using other sulfur-containing compounds or metals as electron acceptors (reviewed by Aüllo et al., 2013). Other members of the Desulfotomaculum (cluster I) have lost the ability for sulfate respiration and instead grow syntrophically in concert with methanogens (Imachi et al., 2006). These phylotypes have been increasingly detected in petroleum reservoirs and in hydrocarbon-containing environments (Gieg et al., 2008; Tan et al., 2015b; Hu et al., 2016) where they presumably act as either primary or secondary syntrophs (Imachi et al., 2006; Kleinsteuber et al., 2012). Compared to published Desulfotomaculum cluster I sequences (Imachi et al., 2006), the Desulfotomaculum 16S rRNA and bssA genes recovered from the produced water cultures clustered within Ii (data not shown); a largely uncharacterized clade containing uncultured prokaryotic clones with the genetic potential to activate and subsequent degrade alkanes and monoaromatic hydrocarbons via fumarate addition (Tan et al., 2015b; Hu et al., 2016). We also observed an increase in bssA gene abundances coinciding with the increase in Desulfotomaculum reads over time (particularly in the light oil-amended culture; Figures 4, 5; Table 2). It is not currently known why the bssA gene abundance decreased in the heavy oil culture after 8–12 months of incubation, despite the continuous increase in Desulfotomaculum reads (Figure 6; Table 2), but may be due to PCR primer/sequencing biases not capturing all Desulfotomaculum phylotypes in the crude oil incubations. There may also be other organisms enriched after these time points that also catalyze aromatic hydrocarbon degradation, such as members of candidate divisions (discussed below), but whose functional genes were not captured using the marker gene assays screened in this study (Table 1).
From our microbial community sequencing results, we also hypothesize that the candidate phylum “Atribacteria” (formerly known as OP9/JS1) and other enriched candidate phyla play a chief role in methanogenic hydrocarbon metabolism based on their progressive enrichment or relative stability over time (Figure 6; Table 2). A recent study by Hu et al. (2016) discussed the role of candidate phyla in the biodegradation of crude oil, finding that “Atribacteria” dominated samples retrieved from oil reservoirs that exhibited the most extensive crude oil biodegradation (while candidate phyla in the other, less-biodegraded samples comprised less than 0.4% abundance in each sample). Sequence fragments orthologous to benzylsuccinate synthase (alpha, gamma subunits), (1-methyl)alkylsuccinate synthase (alpha subunit) and several glycyl radical enzyme activation proteins were identified from “Atribacteria” bins recovered from metagenomic sequencing of the Alaskan oil reservoir samples interrogated (Hu et al., 2016). Carr et al. (2015) also found “Atribacteria” in a methane-rich environment and suggested that it produced methanogenic substrates such as acetate and CO2. Interestingly, Hu et al. (2016) also prepared a draft genome for “Marinimicrobia” (SAR406) and identified an Fe-containing hydrogenase within its genetic material, thus the microorganism may produce hydrogen and participate in syntrophic interactions with methanogens. Members of the phylum “Cloacimonetes” (WWE1) were recently identified in fluids collected from coalbed methane wells (Kirk et al., 2015) and in anaerobic sludge digesters (Limam et al., 2014), also indicating a putative hydrocarbon degrading role for these phylotypes. Most convincingly, Cheng et al. (2013) identified members of the “Cloacimonetes” that participate in 13C-hexadecane biodegradation within a methanogenic oilfield enrichment consortium (along with Syntrophaceae).
Overall, the results from the present study indicate that fumarate addition is a possible mechanism of methanogenic hydrocarbon activation by oilfield-associated microbial communities and as such may represent a key metabolic pathway contributing to heavy oil formation in petroleum reservoirs. Further, time course-based functional gene analyses and microbial community sequencing identified Desulfotomaculum as a key aromatic hydrocarbon degrader under methanogenic conditions. Members of several candidate divisions may also play important roles in methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation, expanding on existing knowledge of the diversity of hydrocarbon-degrading consortia. To assess the putative metabolic functions of “Atribacteria” and other candidate phyla enriched in this study, the metagenome of the light oil-amended culture (from DNA extracted at T12) was recently sequenced using Illumina MiSeq technology; read assembly and analysis are intended future work. We intend to use this metagenomic data to help to uncover putative alkane/hydrocarbon degraders in these communities (e.g., Smithella), which have not yet been conclusively identified in this microbial community, and to help design primers that can capture a greater diversity of anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes.
Author Contributions
CT and LG conceived this research as part of a larger collaboration at the University of Calgary. CT established the oil-degrading produced water cultures and conducted all of the experimental procedures and analyses detailed in this study. CT and LG prepared the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) Discovery grant (#05214-2015) awarded to LG. We would like to thank the laboratory of Dr. Stephen Larter for providing us light oil and for advice pertaining to oil analysis. We are grateful to Dr. Gerrit Voordouw and Yin Shen for providing the produced water samples and associated water chemistry. We also thank Dr. Carolina Berdugo-Clavijo, Dr. Divya Nair, Oscar Montoya, and Corynne M. O'Farrell for their assistance with molecular sample preparation and sequencing analysis.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02610/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
1. ^https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/oil/oil-reserves.html.
References
Abu Laban, N., Selesi, D., Jobelius, C., and Meckenstock, R. U. (2009). Anaerobic benzene degradation by Gram-positive sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68, 300–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00672.x
Agrawal, A., Park, H. S., Nathoo, S., Gieg, L. M., Jack, T. R., Miner, K., et al. (2012). Toluene depletion in produced oil contributes to souring control in a field subjected to nitrate injection. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 1285–1292. doi: 10.1021/es203748b
Aitken, C. M., Jones, D. M., Maguire, M. J., Gray, N. D., Sherry, A., Bowler, B. F. J., et al. (2013). Evidence that crude oil alkane activation proceeds by different mechanisms under sulfate-reducing and methanogenic conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 109, 162–174. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.01.031
An, D., Brown, D., Chatterjee, I., Dong, X., Ramos-Padrón, E., Wilson, S., et al. (2013). Microbial community and potential functional gene diversity involved in anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation and methanogenesis in an oil sands tailings pond. Genome 618, 612–618. doi: 10.1139/gen-2013-0083
Anderson, R. T., and Lovley, D. R. (2000). Hexadecane decay by methanogenesis. Nature 404, 722–723. doi: 10.1038/35008145
Annweiler, E., Materna, A., Safinowski, M., Kappler, A., Richnow, H. H., Michaelis, W., et al. (2000). Anaerobic degradation of 2-methylnaphthalene by a sulfate-reducing enrichment culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 5329–5333. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.12.5329-5333.2000
Aüllo, T., Ranchou-Peyruse, A., Ollivier, B., and Magot, M. (2013). Desulfotomaculum spp. and related gram-positive sulfate-reducing bacteria in deep subsurface environments. Front. Microbiol. 4:362. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00362
Beller, H. R., and Edwards, E. (2000). Anaerobic toluene activation by benzylsuccinate synthase in a highly enriched methanogenic culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 5503–5505. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.12.5503-5505.2000
Beller, H. R., Kane, S. R., Legler, T. C., McKelvie, J. R., Lollar, B. S., Pearson, F., et al. (2008). Comparative assessments of benzene, toluene, and xylene natural attenuation by quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of a catabolic gene, signature metabolites, and compound-specific isotope analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6065–6072. doi: 10.1021/es8009666
Beller, H. R., and Spormann, A. M. (1997). Anaerobic activation of toluene and o-xylene by addition to fumarate in denitrifying strain T. J. Bacteriol. 179, 670–676. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.3.670-676.1997
Berdugo-Clavijo, C., Dong, X., Soh, J., Sensen, C. W., and Gieg, L. M. (2012). Methanogenic biodegradation of two-ringed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 81, 124–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01328.x
Berdugo-Clavijo, C., and Gieg, L. M. (2014). Conversion of crude oil to methane by a microbial consortium enriched from oil reservoir production waters. Front. Microbiol. 5:197. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00197
Berlendis, S., Lascourreges, J. F., Schraauwers, B., Sivadon, P., and Magot, M. (2010). Anaerobic biodegradation of BTEX by original bacterial communities from an underground gas storage aquifer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 3621–3628. doi: 10.1021/es100123b
Bian, X.-Y., Mbadinga, S. M., Liu, Y.-F., Yang, S.-Z., Liu, J.-F., Ye, R.-Q., et al. (2015). Insights into the anaerobic biodegradation pathway of n-alkanes in oil reservoirs by detection of signature metabolites. Sci. Rep. 5:9801. doi: 10.1038/srep09801
Bickford, W. G., Fisher, G. S., Dollear, F. G., and Swift, C. E. (1948). Autoxidation of fats. I. Preparation and oxidation of alkylbenzene-maleic anhydride adducts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 25, 251–254. doi: 10.1007/BF02593477
Boll, M., Löffler, C., Morris, B. E. L., and Kung, J. W. (2014). Anaerobic degradation of homocyclic aromatic compounds via arylcarboxyl-coenzyme A esters: organisms, strategies and key enzymes. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 612–627. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12328
Cai, M., Jiménez, N., Krüger, M., Guo, H., Jun, Y., Straaten, N., et al. (2015). Potential for aerobic and methanogenic oil biodegradation in a water flooded oil field (Dagang oil field). Fuel 141, 143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.035
Callaghan, A. V., Davidova, I. A., Savage-Ashlock, K., Parisi, V. A., Gieg, L. M., Sulfita, J. M., et al. (2010). Diversity of benzyl- and alkylsuccinate synthase genes in hydrocarbon-impacted environments and enrichment cultures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7287–7294. doi: 10.1021/es1002023
Callaghan, A. V., Gieg, L. M., Kropp, K. G., Suflita, J. M., and Young, L. Y. (2006). Comparison of mechanisms of alkane metabolism under sulfate-reducing conditions among two bacterial isolates and a bacterial consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 4274–4282. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02896-05
Callaghan, A. V., Tierney, M., Phelps, C. D., and Young, L. Y. (2009). Anaerobic biodegradation of n-hexadecane by a nitrate-reducing consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 1339–1344. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02491-08
Callahan, B. J., Mcmurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J., and Holmes, S. P. (2016). DADA2: high resolution sample inference from amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
Carr, S. A., Orcutt, B. N., Mandernack, K. W., and Spear, J. R. (2015). Abundant Atribacteria in deep marine sediment from the Adélie Basin, Antarctica. Front. Microbiol. 6:872. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00872
Cheng, L., Ding, C., Li, Q., He, Q., Dai, L.-R., and Zhang, H. (2013). DNA-SIP reveals that Syntrophaceae play an important role in methanogenic hexadecane degradation. PLoS ONE 8:e66784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066784
Cravo-Laureau, C., Grossi, V., Raphel, D., Matheron, R., and Hirschler-Réa, A. (2005). Anaerobic n-alkane metabolism by a Desulfatibacillum aliphaticivorans strain CV2803T. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 3458–3467. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3458-3467.2005
Davidova, I. A., Gieg, L. M., Nanny, M., Kropp, K. G., and Suflita, J. M. (2005). Stable isotopic studies of n-alkane metabolism by a sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichment culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8174–8182. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8174-8182.2005
Eberlein, C., Estelmann, S., Seifert, J., von Bergen, M., Müller, M., Meckenstock, R. U., et al. (2013). Identification and characterization of 2-naphthoyl-coenzyme A reductase, the prototype of a novel class of dearomatizing reductases. Mol. Microbiol. 88, 1032–1039. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12238
Edwards, E. A., and Grbić-Galić, D. (1994). Anaerobic degradation of toluene and o-xylene by methanogenic consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 313–322.
Embree, M., Nagarajan, H., Movahedi, N., Chitsaz, H., and Zengler, K. (2013). Single-cell genome and metatranscriptome sequencing reveal metabolic interactions of an alkane-degrading methanogenic community. ISME J. 8, 757–767. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.187
Feisthauer, S., Siegert, M., Seidel, M., Richnow, H. H., Zengler, K., Gründger, F., et al. (2010). Isotopic fingerprinting of methane and CO2 formation from aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons. Org. Geochem. 41, 482–490. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.01.003
Ficker, M., Krastel, K., and Orlicky, S. (1999). Molecular characterization of a toluene-degrading methanogenic consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5576–5585.
Foght, J. (2008). Anaerobic biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons: pathways and prospects. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 9, 93–120. doi: 10.1159/000121324
Fowler, S. J., Dong, X., Sensen, C. W., Suflita, J. M., and Gieg, L. M. (2012). Methanogenic toluene metabolism: community structure and intermediates. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 754–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02631.x
Fowler, S. J., Gutierrez-Zamora, M.-L., Manefield, M., and Gieg, L. M. (2014). Identification of toluene degraders in a methanogenic enrichment culture. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 89, 625–636. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12364
Gieg, L. M., Davidova, I. A., Duncan, K. E., and Suflita, J. M. (2010). Methanogenesis, sulfate reduction and crude oil biodegradation in hot Alaskan oilfields. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 3074–3086. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02282.x
Gieg, L. M., Duncan, K. E., and Suflita, J. M. (2008). Bioenergy production via microbial conversion of residual oil to natural gas. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 3022–2029. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00119-08
Gieg, L. M., and Suflita, J. M. (2002). Detection of anaerobic metabolites of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum-contaminated aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 3755–3762. doi: 10.1021/es0205333
Gieg, L. M., and Toth, C. R. A. (2017). “Signature metabolite analysis to determine in situ anaerobic hydrocarbon biodegradation,” in Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology Series: Anaerobic Utilization of Hydrocarbons, Oils and Lipids, ed M. Boll (New York, NY: Springer International Publishing), 1–30.
Gray, N. D., Sherry, A., Grant, R. J., Rowan, A. K., Hubert, C. R. J., Callbeck, C. M., et al. (2011). The quantitative significance of Syntrophaceae and syntrophic partnerships in methanogenic degradation of crude oil alkanes. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 2957–2975. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02570.x
Grbić-Galić, D., and Vogel, T. M. (1987). Transformation of toluene and benzene by mixed methanogenic cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 254–260.
Gruner, A., Jarling, R., Vieth-Hillebrand, A., Mangelsdorf, K., Janka, C., van der Kraan, G., et al. (2017). Tracing microbial hydrocarbon transformation processes in a high temperature reservoir using signature metabolites. Organ. Geochem. 108, 82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.03.003
Head, I. M., Gray, N. D., and Larter, S. R. (2014). Life in the slow lane; biogeochemistry of biodegraded petroleum containing reservoirs and implications for energy recovery and carbon management. Front. Microbiol. 5:566. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00566
Head, I. M., Jones, D. M., and Larter, S. R. (2003). Biological activity in the deep subsurface and the origin of heavy oil. Nature 426, 344–352. doi: 10.1038/nature02134
Hu, P., Tom, L., Singh, A., Thomas, B. C., Baker, B. J., Piceno, V. M., et al. (2016). Genome-resolved metagenomic analysis reveals roles for candidate phyla and other microbial community members in biogeochemical transformations in oil reservoirs. MBio 7:e01669-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01669-15
Imachi, H., Sekiguchi, Y., Kamagata, Y., Loy, A., Qiu, Y.-L., Hugenholtz, P., et al. (2006). Non-sulfate-reducing, syntrophic bacteria affiliated with Desulfotomaculum cluster I are widely distributed in methanogenic environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 2080–2091. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2080-2091.2006
Jarling, R., Kühner, S., Basílio Janke, E., Gruner, A., Drozdowska, M., Golding, B. T., et al. (2015). Versatile transformations of hydrocarbons in anaerobic bacteria: substrate ranges and regio- and stereo-chemistry of activation reactions. Front. Microbiol. 6:880. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00880
Johnson, J. M., Wawrik, B., Isom, C., Boling, W. B., and Callaghan, A. V. (2015). Interrogation of Chesapeake Bay sediment microbial communities for intrinsic alkane-utilizing potential under anaerobic conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91, 1–14. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiu035
Jones, D. M., Head, I. M., Gray, N. D., Adams, J. J., Rowan, A. K., Aitken, C. M., et al. (2008). Crude-oil biodegradation via methanogenesis in subsurface petroleum reservoirs. Nature 451, 176–180. doi: 10.1038/nature06484
Kirk, M. F., Wilson, B. H., Marquart, K. A., Zeglin, L. H., Vinson, D. S., and Flynn, T. M. (2015). Solute concentrations influence microbial methanogenesis in coal-bearing strata of the Cherokee basin, USA. Front. Microbiol. 6:1287. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01287
Kleinsteuber, S., Scheinitz, K. M., and Vogt, C. (2012). Key players and team play: anaerobic microbial communities in hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94, 851–873. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4025-0
Klindworth, A., Pruesse, E., Schweer, T., Peplies, J., Quast, C., Horn, M., et al. (2013). Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808
Kniemeyer, O., Fischer, T., Wilkes, H., Glöckner, F. O., and Widdel, F. (2003). Anaerobic degradation of ethylbenzene by a new type of marine sulfate-reducing bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 760–768. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.760-768.2003
Kniemeyer, O., Musat, F., Sievert, S. M., Knittel, K., Wilkes, H., Blumenberg, M., et al. (2007). Anaerobic oxidation of short-chain hydrocarbons by marine sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature 449, 898–901. doi: 10.1038/nature06200
Kropp, K. G., Davidova, I. A., and Suflita, J. M. (2000). Anaerobic oxidation of n-dodecane by an addition reaction in a sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichment culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 5393–5398. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.12.5393-5398.2000
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054
Larter, S., Huang, H., Adams, J., Bennett, B., Jokanola, O., Oldenburg, T., et al. (2006). The controls on the composition of biodegraded oils in the deep subsurface: part II — Geological controls on subsurface biodegradation fluxes and constraints on reservoir-fluid property prediction. AAPG Bull. 90, 921–938. doi: 10.1306/01270605130
Larter, S. R., Adams, J. J., Gates, I., Bennett, B., and Huang, H. (2008). Oil viscosity heterogeneity of tar sand and heavy oil reservoirs: prediction and impact of the production fluid properties. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 47, 52–61. doi: 10.2118/08-01-52
Liang, B., Wang, L.-Y., Mbadinga, S. M., Liu, J.-F., Yang, S.-Z., Gu, J.-D., et al. (2015). Anaerolineaceae and Methanosaeta turned to be the dominant microorganisms in alkanes-dependent methanogenic culture after long-term of incubation. AMB Expr. 5, 37. doi: 10.1186/s13568-015-0117-4
Limam, R. D., Chouari, R., Mazéas, L., Wu, T.-D., Li, T., Grossin-Debattista, J., et al. (2014). Members of the uncultured bacterial candidate division WWE1 are implicated in anaerobic digestion of cellulose. Microbiologyopen 3, 157–167. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.144
Mbadinga, S. M., Li, K.-P., Zhou, L., Wang, L.-Y., Yang, S.-Z., Liu, J.-F., et al. (2012). Analysis of alkane-dependent methanogenic community derived from production water of a high-temperature petroleum reservoir. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96, 531–542. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3828-8
Morasch, B., Schink, B., Tebbe, C. C., and Meckenstock, R. U. (2004). Degradation of o-xylene and m-xylene by a novel sulfate-reducer belonging to the genus Desulfotomaculum. Arch. Microbiol. 181, 407–417. doi: 10.1007/s00203-004-0672-6
Morris, B. E. L., Gissibl, A., Kümmel, S., Richnow, H. H., and Boll, M. (2014). A PCR-based assay for the detection of anaerobic naphthalene degradation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 354, 55–59. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12429
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., et al. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 590–596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219
Rabus, R., Boll, M., Heider, J., Meckenstock, R. U., Buckel, W., Einsle, O., et al. (2016). Anaerobic microbial degradation of hydrocarbons: from enzymatic reactions to the environment. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26, 5–28. doi: 10.1159/000443997
Rabus, R., Wilkes, H., Behrends, A., Armstroff, A., Fischer, T., Pierik, A. J., et al. (2001). Anaerobic initial reaction of n-alkanes in a denitrifying bacterium: evidence for (1-methylpentyl)succinate as initial product and for involvement of an organic radical in n-hexane metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 183, 1707–1715. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.5.1707-1715.2001
Rios-Hernandez, L. A., Gieg, L. M., and Suflita, J. M. (2003). Biodegradation of an alicyclic hydrocarbon by a sulfate-reducing enrichment from a gas condensate-contaminated aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 434–443. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.434-443.2003
Savage, K. N., Krumholz, L. R., Gieg, L. M., Parisi, V. A., Suflita, J. M., Allen, J., et al. (2010). Biodegradation of low-molecular-weight alkanes under mesophilic, sulfate-reducing conditions: metabolic intermediates and community patterns. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 72, 485–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00866.x
Selesi, D., Jehmlich, N., von Bergen, M., Schmidt, F., Rattei, T., Tischler, P., et al. (2010). Combined genomic and proteomic approaches identify gene clusters involved in anaerobic 2-methylnaphthalene degradation in the sulfate-reducing enrichment culture N47. J. Bacteriol. 192, 295–306. doi: 10.1128/JB.00874-09
Selesi, D., and Meckenstock, R. U. (2009). Anaerobic degradation of the aromatic hydrocarbon biphenyl by a sulfate-reducing enrichment culture. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68, 86–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00652.x
Sherry, A., Grant, R. J., Aitken, C. M., Jones, D. M., Head, I. M., and Gray, N. D. (2014). Volatile hydrocarbons inhibit methanogenic crude oil degradation. Front. Microbiol. 5:131. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00131
Sherry, A., Gray, N. D., Ditchfield, A. K., Aitken, C. M., Jones, D. M., Röling, W. F. M., et al. (2013). Anaerobic biodegradation of crude oil under sulphate-reducing conditions leads to only modest enrichment of recognized sulphate-reducing taxa. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 81, 105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.04.009
Siddique, T., Fedorak, P. M., and Foght, J. M. (2006). Biodegradation of short-chain n-alkanes in oil sands tailings under methanogenic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 5459–5464. doi: 10.1021/es060993m
Siddique, T., Penner, T., Klassen, J., Nesbø, C., and Foght, J. M. (2012). Microbial communities involved in methane production from hydrocarbons in oil sands tailings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 9802–9810. doi: 10.1021/es302202c
Siddique, T., Penner, T., Semple, K., and Foght, J. M. (2011). Anaerobic biodegradation of longer-chain n-alkanes coupled to methane production in oil sands tailings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 5892–5899. doi: 10.1021/es200649t
Siddique, T., Fedorak, P. M., MacKinnon, M. D., and Foght, J. M. (2007). Metabolism of BTEX and naphtha compounds to methane in oil sands tailings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 2350–2356. doi: 10.1021/es062852q
Siegert, M., Cichocka, D., Herrmann, S., Gründger, F., Feisthauer, S., Richnow, H.-H., et al. (2011). Accelerated methanogenesis from aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons under iron- and sulfate-reducing conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 315, 6–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02165.x
Stagars, M. H., Ruff, S. E., Amann, R., and Knittel, K. (2016). High diversity of anaerobic alkane-degrading microbial communities in marine seep sediments based on (1-methylalkyl)succinate synthase genes. Front. Microbiol. 6:1511. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01511
Suri, N., Voordouw, J., and Voordouw, G. (2017). The effectiveness of nitrate-mediated control of the oil field sulfur cycle depends on the toluene content of the oil. Front. Microbiol. 8:956. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00956
Tamura, K., and Masatoshi, N. (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023
Tan, B., Dong, X., Sensen, C. W., and Foght, J. (2013). Metagenomic analysis of an anaerobic alkane-degrading microbial culture: potential hydrocarbon-activating pathways and inferred roles. Genome 611, 599–611. doi: 10.1139/gen-2013-0069
Tan, B., Fowler, S. J., Abu Laban, N., Dong, X., Sensen, C. W., Foght, J., et al. (2015a). Comparative analysis of metagenomes from three methanogenic hydrocarbon-degrading enrichment cultures with 41 environmental samples. ISME J. 9, 2028–2045. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.22
Tan, B., Semple, K., and Foght, J. (2015b). Anaerobic alkane biodegradation by cultures enriched from oil sands tailings ponds involves multiple species capable of fumarate addition. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91:fiv042. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv042
Townsend, G. T., Prince, R. C., and Suflita, J. M. (2003). Anaerobic oxidation of crude oil hydrocarbons by the resident microorganisms of a contaminated anoxic aquifer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 5213–5218. doi: 10.1021/es0264495
von Netzer, F., Pilloni, G., Kleindienst, S., Krüger, M., Knittel, K., Gründger, F., et al. (2013). Enhanced gene detection assays for fumarate-adding enzymes allow uncovering of anaerobic hydrocarbon degraders in terrestrial and marine systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 543–552. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02362-12
Voordouw, G., Grigoryan, A. A., Lambo, A., Lin, S., Park, H. S., Jack, T. R., et al. (2009). Sulfide remediation by pulsed injection of nitrate into a low temperature Canadian heavy oil reservoir. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 9512–9518. doi: 10.1021/es902211j
Washer, C. E., and Edwards, E. A. (2007). Identification and expression of benzylsuccinate synthase genes in a toluene-degrading methanogenic consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1367–1369. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01904-06
Wawrik, B., Marks, C. R., Davidova, I. A., McInerney, M. J., Pruitt, S., Duncan, K. E., et al. (2016). Methanogenic paraffin degradation proceeds via alkane addition to fumarate by “Smithella” spp. mediated by a syntrophic coupling with hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2604–2619. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13374
Widdel, F., Knittel, K., and Galushkom, A. (2010). “Anaerobic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms: an overview,” in Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, ed K. N. Timmis (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 1997–2021.
Wilkes, H., Kühner, S., Bolm, C., Fischer, T., Classen, A., Widdel, F., et al. (2003). Formation of n-alkane- and cycloalkane-derived organic acids during anaerobic growth of a denitrifying bacterium with crude oil. Org. Geochem. 34, 1313–1323. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(03)00099-8
Winderl, C., Schaefer, S., and Lueders, T. (2007). Detection of anaerobic toluene and hydrocarbon degraders in contaminated aquifers using benzylsuccinate synthase (bssA) genes as a functional marker. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1035–1046. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01230.x
Xia, W., Shen, W., Yu, L., Zheng, C., Yu, W., and Tang, Y. (2016). Conversion of petroleum to methane by the indigenous methanogenic consortia for oil recovery in heavy oil reservoir. Appl. Energy 171, 646–655. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.059
Ye, J., Coulouris, G., Zaretskaya, I., Cutcutache, I., Rozan, S., and Madden, T. L. (2012). Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform. 13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134
Zengler, K., Richnow, H., Rosselló-Mora, R., Michaelis, W., and Widdel, F. (1999). Methane formation from long-chain alkanes by anaerobic microorganisms. Nature 401, 266–269. doi: 10.1038/45777
Zhou, L., Li, K. P., Mbadinga, S. M., Yang, S. Z., Gu, J. D., and Mu, B. Z. (2012). Analyses of n-alkanes degrading community dynamics of a high-temperature methanogenic consortium enriched from production water of a petroleum reservoir by a combination of molecular techniques. Ecotoxicology 21, 1680–1691. doi: 10.1007/s10646-012-0949-5
Keywords: crude oil, methanogenesis, biodegradation, fumarate addition, anaerobic, hydrocarbon, heavy oil formation
Citation: Toth CRA and Gieg LM (2018) Time Course-Dependent Methanogenic Crude Oil Biodegradation: Dynamics of Fumarate Addition Metabolites, Biodegradative Genes, and Microbial Community Composition. Front. Microbiol. 8:2610. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02610
Received: 29 September 2017; Accepted: 14 December 2017;
Published: 04 January 2018.
Edited by:
Sabine Kleinsteuber, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ), GermanyReviewed by:
Elizabeth Anne Edwards, University of Toronto, CanadaBoonfei Tan, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore
Copyright © 2018 Toth and Gieg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lisa M. Gieg, bG1naWVnQHVjYWxnYXJ5LmNh