Piriformospora indica: Potential and Significance in Plant Stress Tolerance

Abstract

Owing to its exceptional ability to efficiently promote plant growth, protection and stress tolerance, a mycorrhiza like endophytic Agaricomycetes fungus Piriformospora indica has received a great attention over the last few decades. P. indica is an axenically cultiviable fungus which exhibits its versatility for colonizing/hosting a broad range of plant species through directly manipulating plant hormone-signaling pathway during the course of mutualism. P. indica-root colonization leads to a better plant performance in all respect, including enhanced root proliferation by indole-3-acetic acid production which in turn results into better nutrient-acquisition and subsequently to improved crop growth and productivity. Additionally, P. indica can induce both local and systemic resistance to fungal and viral plant diseases through signal transduction. P. indica-mediated stimulation in antioxidant defense system components and expressing stress-related genes can confer crop/plant stress tolerance. Therefore, P. indica can biotize micropropagated plantlets and also help these plants to overcome transplantation shock. Nevertheless, it can also be involved in a more complex symbiotic relationship, such as tripartite symbiosis and can enhance population dynamic of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In brief, P. indica can be utilized as a plant promoter, bio-fertilizer, bioprotector, bioregulator, and biotization agent. The outcome of the recent literature appraised herein will help us to understand the physiological and molecular bases of mechanisms underlying P. indica-crop plant mutual relationship. Together, the discussion will be functional to comprehend the usefulness of crop plant-P. indica association in both achieving new insights into crop protection/improvement as well as in sustainable agriculture production.

Introduction

In natural ecosystems, a variety of microorganisms seek to obtain nutrients for their survival by interacting with plants, where the interaction can be neutral, harmful (parasitism), or beneficial (mutualism or symbiosis) to the host (Shen et al., 2006; Thrall et al., 2007). However, most plants in natural ecosystems have been reported to display their high degree of colonization/symbiosis with mycorrhizal fungi and/or fungal endophytes (Rodriguez et al., 2009; Zuccaro et al., 2011). Biotrophy, necrotrophy and hemibiotrophy are among the major lifestyles that plant-associated fungi can exhibit (Zuccaro et al., 2011). The actively metabolizing plant tissues are required by biotrophic fungi where host is kept alive; whereas, the host is killed by necrotrophic fungi to obtain nutrients from the dead cells for their own growth and survival. The hemibiotrophic fungi belongs to an intermediate category, which requires living host cells during the initial part of their life cycles, and later acts as a necrotrophic fungi (Zuccaro et al., 2011).

Piriformospora indica, an axenically cultivable phytopromotional, biotrophic mutualistic root endosymbiont belongs to order Sebacinales (Basidiomycota) and has been reported to mimic capabilities of typical arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. This fungus can colonize roots of a wide range of higher plants and provide plants multifaceted amenities (such as nutrient uptake, disease resistance, stress tolerance and growth-promotion involving value addition) (Unnikumar et al., 2013). In plant groups other than crops, for example orchids, P. indica has been reported to be primarily existed as a partner of mycorrhiza (Schäfer and Kogel, 2009). This fungus has been reported to perform multifarious functions, including its role in biological hardening during transplantation of micro-propagated plantlets (Singh et al., 2003), increased endogenous content of spilanthol after realization of its mutual interaction with medicinal plants such as Spilanthes calva (Rai et al., 2004). P. indica infestation in Helianthus annus and Aristolochia elegans has resulted into the stimulated synthesis of valuable compounds (Bagde et al., 2010a, 2014). Additionally, Bacopa monnieri co-cultivated with P. indica exhibited an enhanced growth, elevated bacoside endogenous level, antioxidant activity and nuclear hypertrophy (Prasad et al., 2013). Notably, compared to many other endophytes, P. indica can be cultured very easily in a bioreactor in order to prepare effective biofertilizer formulations (Singh et al., 2003; Oelmüller et al., 2009; Bagde et al., 2010b; Qiang et al., 2011). P. indica inocula are very effective for their commercial applications to various crops within the defined parameters viz., inocula quantity, inoculation time point, as well as soil selection for plant cultivation. Moreover, P. indica root endophyte has been credibly evidenced to minimize the use of chemical fertilizers, control crop yield, and also to provide increased resistance and tolerance in plants against biotic and abiotic stresses (Unnikumar et al., 2013). In our recent effort, P. indica-mediated improvements in the biomass, seed germination, plant growth and development and crop productivity under favorable environmental conditions were highlighted, and P. indica was argued as a powerful tool for crop improvement (Ansari et al., 2014).

Taking into account of recent literature, this paper: (a) overviews P. indica-strategies for root colonization; (b) gives insights into P. indica–plant mutualistic interaction and the role of calcium; (c) enlightens the association of P. indica with programmed cell death (PCD); (d) dissects information related with P. indica genome; (e) appraises literature available on P. indica-services to plants; (f) evaluates interaction of P. indica with other microorganisms, and appraises biotechnological significance of P. indica; (g) cross-talks information related with regulatory role of P. indica for the genes involved in plant metabolism, mineral uptake, in plant stress resistance and defense; and finally, (h) highlights the least explored aspects in the present context so far.

Piriformospora indica–Strategies for Root-Colonization

The fact that P. indica has a broad host range, which is not only confined to vascular plants but also to colonized mosses, implies that this fungus has evolved highly effective colonization strategies (Qiang et al., 2011). Some facts related with the lifestyle and the mechanisms underlying root colonization of P. indica from its interaction with many plants (such as Hordeum vulgare and Arabidopsis thaliana) have been unraveled (Deshmukh et al., 2006; Schäfer and Kogel, 2009). Generally, symbionts colonize rhizodermal and cortical cell layers of roots (Khatabi, 2009). Root colonization by P. indica is also known to start with interacellular chlamydospore germination and forming extracellular hyphal mats, and simultaneously penetrating rhizodermal and cortical cells (Deshmukh et al., 2006; Jacobs et al., 2011). As colonization proceeds, roots are densely covered with extracellular hyphae and harbor through inter- and intracellular networks; however, the fungus never enters into the vascular tissues. At cellular level, this fungus colonizes living root cells by its direct penetration (Jacobs et al., 2011). No microscopic evidence for impairment or even necrotization was found in H. vulgare and P. indica-colonized A. thaliana roots (Schäfer and Kogel, 2009). The colonization patterns of the various root regions harbor some quantitative as well as qualitative differences, which distinguish P. indica on H. vulgare (and A. thaliana) from endomycorrhizal fungi. The fungal root colonization increases with root maturation and the highest fungal biomass has been found in the differentiation, particularly in the root hair zones. Cytological studies have revealed the diverse types of P. indica-interaction with different root regions of H. vulgare, where the root hair zone (as the oldest root zone) was observed to be highly colonized by intracellular hyphae (Deshmukh et al., 2006). Cells in the differentiation zone can be filled with fungal hyphae reminiscent of hyphal coils (Deshmukh et al., 2006); whereas, scarcely and solely extracellularly colonization can be evidenced in the cells of meristematic zone (Schäfer and Kogel, 2009). Importantly, the physiological activity of host cells has been considered as a prerequisite for efficient nutrient exchange between the symbiotic partners (Schäfer and Kogel, 2009). Thus, root colonization pattern of P. indica differs from that of AM fungi, which are known to preferentially colonize younger root parts (Schäfer and Kogel, 2009) (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Hückelhoven, 2004; Lam, 2004; Deshmukh et al., 2006; Deshmukh and Kogel, 2007; Schäfer et al., 2009; Vadassery and Oelmüller, 2009; Jacobs et al., 2011; Qiang et al., 2011).

Zuccaro et al. (2011) presented the first in-depth genomic study and unveiled a mutualistic symbiont with a biphasic lifestyle. On the 25 Mb genome of the mutualistic root symbiont P. indica, the authors characterized fungal transcriptional responses associated with the colonization of living and dead H. vulgare roots. A biphasic root colonization strategy of P. indica was revealed by microarray analysis, where a tightly controlled expression of the lifestyle-associated gene-sets was reported during the onset of the symbiosis. It has been observed that about 10% of the fungal genes induced during the biotrophic colonization encoded putative small secreted proteins (SSP). SSP included several lectin-like proteins and members of a P. indica-specific gene family (DELD) with a conserved novel seven-amino acids motif at the C-terminus (Zuccaro et al., 2011). The occurrence of the DELDs was further correlated with the presence of transposable elements in gene-poor repeat-rich regions of the genome similar to the effectors found in other filamentous organisms. These findings together, helped to understand the development of biotrophic plant symbionts and also suggested a series of incremental shifts along the continuum from saprotrophy toward biotrophy in the evolution of mycorrhizal association from decomposer fungi (Zuccaro et al., 2011).

On the perspective of the biotrophic colonization pattern of P. indica, it has been reported that the P. indica biotrophic colonization pattern can be accompanied by a broad-spectrum suppression of root innate immunity (Qiang et al., 2011). In the support of the large host range of P. indica, molecular and genetic analyses revealed that plant roots, similar to leaves, are equipped with an effective innate immune system where immune suppression by P. indica was considered as a prerequisite for successful root colonization (Jacobs et al., 2011; Qiang et al., 2011). A little work has been performed in order to decipher the underlying mechanisms of suppression of root innate immunity by P. indica for a successful colonization. However, there are evidences that signify the involvement of several phytohormones in this context (Qiang et al., 2011). H. vulgare and Arabidopsis mutants impaired in gibberelic acid (GA) and jasmonic acid (JA) metabolism, respectively exhibited elevated root immune responses together with reduced root colonization (Schäfer et al., 2009; Jacobs et al., 2011). Studies have also revealed the dependency of P. indica on JA-mediated suppression of early immune responses (e.g., root oxidative burst) as well as salicylic acid (SA)- and glucosinolate-related defense pathways (Jacobs et al., 2011). For example, Arabidopsis mutants impaired in SA- and glucosinolate-associated defense were reported to be more susceptible to P. indica (Sherameti et al., 2008; Jacobs et al., 2011). The disturbance of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) integrity by P. indica has been advocated to have potential for impairing the secretion of immunity-associated proteins (e.g., PR1 and PRRs) (Qiang et al., 2011). This suppression of early immune signaling (which disturbs immune execution) may potentially disarm the root, and thereby may facilitate root colonization. Since the genome of P. indica is available, it is possible to identify effector molecules targetting immune signaling components (Qiang et al., 2011).

Piriformospora indica–Plant Mutualistic Interaction and the Role of Calcium Ions

Both mutualists and commensals are identical for many fungi during the initial phases of infection and colonization by pathogens (Rodriguez et al., 2004). Thus, the mode of recognition and early signaling processes are crucial in understanding how plants can differentiate between a beneficial and a detrimental microbe which in turn can modulate the expression of lifestyle in plants (Vadassery and Oelmüller, 2009; Singh et al., 2011). Notably, within seconds or minutes after the recognition of the two partners, an increase in the level of intracellular calcium (Ca²⁺) in a plant cell has been considered as an early signaling event in the interaction of pathogenic, mycorrhizal or endophytic microbes with plants (McAinsh and Pittman, 2009). Nevertheless, in various plant-signaling pathways, Ca²⁺ ions act as a second messenger in order to couple extracellular stimuli with intracellular and whole plant responses (Sanders et al., 2002). Endophytic and mycorrhizal fungus interactions result in a better plant performance through sequential cytoplasmic and nuclear Ca²⁺elevations (Vadassery and Oelmüller, 2009).

Ca²⁺ ions have been evidenced as a key participant in the mutualistic interaction of both P. indica and Arabidopsis. It is also one of the earliest signaling events during the recognition of these two symbionts, where a rapid induction of [Ca²⁺]_cyt elevation follows a nuclear Ca²⁺ response (Vadassery et al., 2009). Quite a few mutants which do not respond to P. indica concerning growth promotion and higher biomass production are also impaired in [Ca²⁺]_cyt elevation. Additionally, elevations in the [Ca²⁺]_cyt can also be induced by an autoclaved cell wall extract (CWE) from P. indica, which also can promote growth of Arabidopsis and other plant species (Vadassery et al., 2009). Previous facts together suggest insignificance of root colonization by the living fungus in the highlighted above response. Inductions in the elevation of [Ca²⁺]_cyt by autoclaved CWE, preferentially in the roots confirm that the endophyte is a root-colonizing fungus. The very same CWE can induce a slightly different Ca²⁺ signature in tobacco roots hinting at the possibility of species-specific plant responses. CWE from P. indica also induces tuberization in vitro and promotes tuber growth and yield in potato due to increased transcript expression of the two Ca²⁺ dependant proteins (such as CaM1 and St-CDPK1) and the lipoxygenase (LOX) mRNA, which are known to play distinct roles in potato tuberization (Upadhyaya et al., 2013).

At the contact surface of plants, P. indica exchanges various signals which can result into influx of phosphorus and efflux of Ca²⁺ within plant cell (Yadav et al., 2010; Ansari et al., 2013). The external stimuli from endophyte signaling cascade of cellular network either signifies phytohormones to mainly be involved in PCD via endoplasmic reticulum stress or directly be involved in growth and development (Qiang et al., 2011; Ansari et al., 2013). Exhibition of the reduced colonization, plant growth and development were reported by the plant mutants impaired in GA and JA metabolism (Schäfer et al., 2009; Jacobs et al., 2011). Generally, in PCD, Ca²⁺ and phytohormone signal as internal or external stimuli that down-regulates (PR1b, PR5, β-gulcanase etc.) and up-regulates (auxin) (BI-1 gene) (Hückelhoven, 2004; Lam, 2004; Deshmukh and Kogel, 2007; Trivedi et al., 2013). PCD as DNA fragmentation and cell shrinkage were common during P. indica colonization (Deshmukh et al., 2006). The host cell death in H. vulgare plants via constitutively overexpressing the negative cell death regulator Bax Inhibitor-1 (BI-1) was reported to reduce colonization of roots (Deshmukh et al., 2006). Arabidopsis roots displayed ultrastructural alterations at the time of cell death that was linked with the colonization by P. indica. This can be explained by the fact that P. indica induces ER stress in colonized roots and also suppresses the adaptive ER stress response pathway (unfolded protein response, UPR) (Qiang et al., 2011, 2012). The inability of colonized cells to relieve ER stress via the UPR leads to activation of a pro-apoptotic signaling cascade (Qiang et al., 2011, 2012). Phytohormones and Ca²⁺ (which might occur at the plant-fungus interface) can direct the molecular and physiological processes responsible for the actual mechanism of P. indica colonization with plants providing various benefits to plants (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

Camehl and Oelmüller, 2010; Sun et al., 2010; White and Torres, 2010; Foyer and Shigeoka, 2011; Molitor et al., 2011; Hamilton et al., 2012; Zarea et al., 2012).

Piriformospora indica and Programmed Cell Death

Generally, PCD is a natural response of plants to face physiological constraints provoked by varied internal or external stimuli (Hückelhoven, 2004; Lam, 2004). PCD is a metabolically regulated mechanism (e.g., nutrient recycling) vital for plant development. However, in the case of hypersensitive response (HR), PCD has a protective function in local and systemic tissue, characterized by defense gene expression to check the growth and propagation of pathogens (Heath, 2000; Hoeberichts and Woltering, 2003). Plant-PCD shares some common characteristics to apoptosis in animals such as chromatin condensation, cell shrinkage and DNA fragmentation followed by the nucleus breakdown (Heath, 1998). The fungal colonization of roots begins with a biotrophic growth phase, in which living cells are colonized, and followed by a cell death-dependent phase, in which root cells are actively killed by the fungus (Qiang et al., 2011). Earlier, P. indica was reported to colonize roots (such as that of Arabidopsis) by an initial biotrophic phase, which was evidenced to follow a cell death-dependent phase that may not show any disease symptoms on plant roots (Deshmukh et al., 2006). DNA fragmentation and cell shrinkage, common features of PCD can also be observed in P. indica-colonized roots (Deshmukh et al., 2006). It is assumed that P. indica uses these dead cells for intracellular sporulation (Qiang et al., 2011). In contrary to their pronounced induction during pathogen-induced HR (Heath, 2000), Deshmukh and Kogel (2007) argued that the kind of cell death occurred during P. indica colonization in H. vulgare may not be regarded as a microorganism-antagonizing plant response, since the defense marker genes (e.g., PR1b, PR5 and 1,3-β-glucanase) are weakly and transiently up-regulated solely at early interaction stages. Besides, accumulation of ROS (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂), as well as whole-cell auto-fluorescence mediated by phenolic compounds as characteristics of HR (Lamb and Dixon, 1997; Heath, 2000; Apel and Hirt, 2004) have never been detected in the P. indica colonized roots (Schäfer et al., 2007).

Transmission electron microscopic studies have revealed that cells are not dead at the penetration stages but show ultrastructural changes as cell-colonization is ascertained (Qiang et al., 2011). It implies that the fungal-colonization strategy is not merely focused on the perception and subsequent colonization of dead cells though the penetrated host cells certainly die at one defined point of cell-colonization (Schäfer and Kogel, 2009). Evidences also confirm the dependency of this colonization strategy merely on the host cell death. Reduced colonization of roots was observed in H. vulgare plants constitutively overexpressing the negative cell death regulator Bax Inhibitor-1 (BI-1) (Deshmukh et al., 2006). The expression of BI-1 in P. indica-infested H. vulgare was suppressed from 5 days after inoculation onward, which corresponded with cellular mycelial proliferation, and did not match with earlier root penetration events. Additionally, in comparison to the wild-type plants, the constitutive overexpression of HvBI-1 in H. vulgare led to a significant reduction in fungal biomass at 20 days after inoculation. These findings also agreed with the significant role of BI-1 in plant defense and cell survival (Schäfer et al., 2007). BI-1, known to be an integrator of ER stress, supports cell integrity and viability under unfavorable conditions. Besides its involvement in cell death, the ER is also significant for correct processing of immunity-related proteins with an extracellular (Wang et al., 2005) or plasma membrane-associated destination, including the pattern recognition receptor EFR (Nekrasov et al., 2009; Saijo et al., 2009). After recognition of the bacterial elongation factor TU, EFR activates basal immunity and effectively halts bacterial invasion of plants (Zipfel et al., 2006). Recent cellular analyses of Arabidopsis roots revealed ultrastructural alterations during cell death-associated colonization by P. indica (Qiang et al., 2011, 2012). According to these studies, P. indica induces ER stress in colonized roots, nevertheless, at the same time suppresses the adaptive ER stress i.e., unfolded protein response pathway (UPR). The inability of colonized cells to relieve ER stress via the UPR leads to activation of a pro-apoptotic signaling cascade. Thus, vacuolar collapse was identified to be downstream of ER stress and to represent a key element of the P. indica-induced cell death pathway. This vacuolar collapse has been considered essential for both cell death execution and root colonization, which is mediated by vacuolar processing enzymes (VPEs). For example, Arabidopsis mutants lacking VPEs were found incapable of undergoing cell death-associated vacuolar collapse and exhibited reduced fungal colonization (Qiang et al., 2011, 2012). It has been suggested that P. indica achieved its large host range through a biphasic colonization strategy, which consists of biotrophic accommodation by effective host immune suppression, followed by an ER stress-induced caspase-dependent vacuolar cell death. The exact execution of both colonization phases is a prerequisite for a successful symbiosis with Arabidopsis (Qiang et al., 2011, 2012). PYK10, a gene for an abundant β-glucosidease/myrosinase of 65 kDa is located in the ER (Nitz et al., 2001; Matsushima et al., 2004) and has been identified as a target of P. indica in Arabidopsis roots (Peškan-Berghöfer et al., 2004; Sherameti et al., 2008). PYK10 was argued as a requirement for the beneficial interaction between Arabidopsis and P. indica (Sherameti et al., 2008). In fact, non-toxic glucosinolates can be hydrolyzed by myrosinases to biologically active isothiocyanates, thiocyanates, nitriles or epithio nitriles (Rask et al., 2000; Wittstock and Halkier, 2002). However, the nature of the aglycon moieties released from the substrates basically controls the biological function of a myrosinase. The involvement of these aglycons in the plant defense against herbivores and microbes has been reported (Stotz et al., 1999, 2000; Rask et al., 2000; Tierens et al., 2001). Thus, myrosinases can be exploited for their applications in plant biotic/abiotic stress defense.

Sherameti et al. (2008) hypothesized that the broad host range of P. indica is possibly due to its interaction(s) based on general recognition and signaling processes. In order to identify plant genes, which are targeted by the fungus, Arabidopsis mutants were screened that do not respond to the fungus with regard to growth promotion and enhanced seed production (Oelmüller et al., 2004; Shahollari et al., 2007). The authors reported that the growth of a T-DNA insertion line in PYK10 is not promoted and the plants do not produce more seeds in the presence of P. indica, although their roots are more colonized by the fungus in comparison with the wild-type roots. Overexpression of PYK10 mRNA did not affect either root colonization or the response to the fungus. The basic helix-loop-helix domain containing transcription factor NAI1 activates expression of PYK10, and two Arabidopsis lines with mutations in the NAI1 gene show similar response to P. indica as that of PYK10 insertion line. PYK10 transcript and PYK10 protein levels are severely reduced in a NAI1 mutant, signifying that PYK10 is responsible for the response to the fungus not the transcription factor NAI1. The message level for a leucine-rich repeat protein LRR1 is upregulated in wild-type roots in the presence of P. indica but not for plant defensin 1.2 (PDF1.2). Contrary to that, the message level for PDF1.2 is upregulated in the presence of the fungus in lines with reduced PYK10, not for LRR1. Sherameti et al. (2008) concluded that PYK10 restricts root colonization by P. indica, which leads into repression of defense responses and the upregulation of responses directing to a mutualistic interaction between the two symbiotic partners.

Piriformospora indica Genome – Insights to Surprise

A comparison of the P. indica genome with other fungi has revealed its classical features related with biotrophism as well as saprotrophism. The colonization of P. indica with Arabidopsis roots has been report to involve an initial biotrophic phase followed by cell death dependent phase, leading ultimately to no disease symptoms on roots (Deshmukh et al., 2006). However, P. indica was reported to use the dead cells formed therein during the course of infection for intracellular sporulation (Qiang et al., 2011). The endophyte infection was earlier considered entirely symptomless, involving certain genes to indicate systemic root colonization by different fungal groups (Waller et al., 2008). Exhibition of biotroph-associated genomic adaptations has been evidenced in P. indica, where genes involved in N metabolism are lacking and also a limited potential is displayed by this mutualistic symbiont for host-damage and destruction (Zuccaro et al., 2011). In fact, P. indica lacks genes potentially involved in biosynthesis of toxic secondary metabolites and cyclic peptides. Nevertheless, genomic traits with saprotrophic and hemibiotrophic phytopathogenic fungi (such as the presence of an expanded enzyme arsenal which is weakly expressed during the initial biotrophic phase) are also shared by P. indica (Zuccaro et al., 2011). The analyses of the colonized young H. vulgare roots has revealed 579 genes in the phase of pre-penetration (36–48 hpi), 397 genes at early colonization (3 dpi) and 641 genes (5 dpi) as distinctively regulated when compared to fungal free roots (Zuccaro et al., 2011). In addition, the majority of genes (≈40%) induced via symbiosis were found to be non-orthologous to either species; rather, these were reported specific to P. indica (Zuccaro et al., 2011). Plant hormones such as JA, methyl-jasmonate and ethylene signals from the roots were reported to decide the shoots to become preconditioned prior to foliar pathogens infection in P. indica-colonized roots via activating defense responses which in turn were evidenced to lead to enhanced disease resistance (Stein et al., 2008). In a signaling cascade, the JA (VSP, PDF1.2, LOX2) plus ET (ERF1) signaling and not the SA signaling (PR1, PR5) genes were up-regulated in the P. indica plants in order to cope the powdery mildew fungus (Waller et al., 2005; Unnikumar et al., 2013). The indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and ethylene role has been implicated in establishing a biotrophic symbiosis representing a compatibility factor at contact surface between endophyte and plants (Hilbert et al., 2012; Khatabi et al., 2012). The augmented intracellular Ca²⁺ pool after attaining the basic compatibility between the two partners in an early signaling event in the interaction of endophyte with plants (McAinsh and Pittman, 2009), acts as a second messenger in various plant signaling pathways (Sanders et al., 2002).

Piriformospora indica-Services to Plant Community

Nutrient Acquisition

Soil signifies a positive environment for a wide range of microorganisms including algae, bacteria, and fungi and the chemical changes that happen within the soil environment involve the active contribution of soil microflora (Prasad et al., 2015a). They chiefly participate in the processes which are necessary for plant growth and survival such as C and N cycle, nutrient acquisition and soil formation. On the other hand, owing to their role in C-input in soils through root exudates, plants can also have profound effects on soil microbial communities especially those colonizing the rhizosphere (Khatabi, 2009).

Being immobile organisms, plants have to cope with unfavorable conditions such as nutrient deficiency, salinity, drought, and pathogen attacks etc. Thus, to avoid such adverse situations, plants tend to establish their associations with beneficial microorganisms (Lum and Hirsch, 2003). In particular, symbiosis with beneficial fungi are known to be vital for nutrient acquisition by the root systems of most plants (Sirrenberg et al., 2007). Thus, application of beneficial microorganisms as biofertilizer plays a key role in today’s agricultural scenario through enhancement of soil fertility and crop production. For example, mycorrhizal fungi and AM fungi under the order Glomales, are known to have symbiotic relationship with the majority of terrestrial plant species, where the fungi facilitate plants in their accession to soil nutrients, mainly phosphate (Harrison, 2005). Interestingly, AM symbiosis is described relatively primordial with that of rhizobium-legume association where ‘Myc factor,’ a AM fungal signal, is a mixture of sulphated and non-sulphated simple lipochitooligosaccharides, might turn on signaling pathways having similar components of doesn’t make infections (DMI)-signal transduction pathway to establish the mycorrhiza formation to promote plant growth (Maillet et al., 2011). Endophytic fungi P. indica which is phylogenetically close to mycorrhizal endosymbionts of orchid and ericoid roots has also been recognized as a growth promoter of numerous plant species (Varma et al., 1999; Weiss et al., 2004). Although mutual nutrient exchange through specialized structures is generally accepted as the main beneficial factor in mycorrhiza, however, major mechanisms of interaction in other endophytic systems are still not clear.

P. indica and Acquisition of Phosphorous in Plants

Phosphorous (P), one of the most essential mineral nutrients constitutes up to 0.5% of the dry weight of plant cell, and plays diverse regulatory, structural, and energy transfer roles (Balemi and Negisho, 2012). Plants cannot directly access P present in the soil as it is mostly in the form of scarcely soluble complexes; hence, its deficiency impedes crop production throughout the world (Balemi and Negisho, 2012). Plants acquire P from the soil through direct uptake by its own transporters and indirect uptake through mycorrhizal associations (Yadav et al., 2010). P. indica was reported to mediate the uptake of radiolabelled P from the culture medium and its translocation to the host in an energy-dependent process (Varma et al., 2000). P. indica also produce significant amounts of acid phosphatases which can enable the host plant to access adequate amount of insoluble, condensed or complex forms of phosphate reserve in the soil (Singh et al., 2000). The association of P ectomycorrhiza and its role in plant P-aacquisition has been the focuss of recent studies (Becquer et al., 2014; Johri et al., 2015). Identification and characterization of high affinity phosphate transporters were also done in several plant and fungal species including A. thaliana, Medicago truncatula, Lycopersicon esculentum, Solanum tuberosum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Neurospora crassa (reviewed by Johri et al., 2015). Notably, due to the lack of a stable transformation system in AM fungal species the role of phosphate transporters could not be established (Maldonado-Mendoza et al., 2001). Isolation, identification, and functional characterization of a high affinity phosphate transporter from root endophyte fungus P. indica revealed the essentiality of phosphate transporter (PiPT) for phosphate transport to the host plant (Yadav et al., 2010). Nevertheless, the mechanism of this phosphate transfer from the fungus to the plant is not yet clear, though it has been hypothesized that the process might occur at the plant-fungus interface. This process essentially requires two transporters: the first to enable efflux of phosphate from the fungus and the second to mediate uptake of phosphate by the plant (Rausch and Bucher, 2002).

The reports concerning the involvement of P. indica in phosphate transfer and improvement in host plant are contradictory. Shahollari et al. (2005) reported that P. indica enhances the phosphate uptake 2–3 times higher in Arabidopsis seedlings and suggested that P. indica stimulates Arabidopsis growth in a manner parallel of mycorrhizal fungi. On the contrary, it has also been reported that P. indica does not induce significant increase of leaf P and N and phosphate has no role in the improved biomass of Nicotiana attenuata (Barazani et al., 2005). Yadav et al. (2010) reported that P. indica is involved in the phosphate transfer to the host Zea mays plant and proposed that involvement of PiPT in indirect phosphate transport to host plants presents the information regarding the molecular mechanism underlying P. indica-mediated phosphate transport to the host plant. However, it was resported earlier that P. indica does not induce potato phosphate transporter gene (StPT3) and that P. indica is not involved in the phosphate transfer to host plant (Karandashov et al., 2004). Correspondingly, no improved phosphate supply (a central mechanism of host plant fortification by AM fungi) was evidenced in P. indica–H. vulgare symbiosis (Achatz et al., 2010). However, the improved grain yield induced by the fungus was found to be independent of different P and N fertilization levels. Also, the total phosphate contents of host plant roots and shoots were not significantly affected by P. indica. The authors concluded that positive influence of P. indica on H. vulgare grain yield was independent of P and N supply and rather due to accelerated growth that leads to early development (Achatz et al., 2010).

Contrary to the reports discussed above, Yadav et al. (2010) found the impact of phosphate on the biomass of the Z. mays plant colonized with P. indica. Increased total phosphate content as well as biomass in the plants colonized with wild-type P. indica as compared with non-colonized and KD-PiPT P. indica-colonized plants were observed. These findings imply that phosphate play a significant role in the improvement of yield or biomass of Zea mays, and that enhanced biomass is in fact due to the PiPT. Furthermore, the growth-promoting activity (in terms of biomass) of P. indica was two-fold higher at low phosphate condition as compared with high phosphate condition (1.2-fold). Kumar et al. (2011) further investigated to ascertain whether growth-promoting activity of P. indica is an inherent trait of the fungus or it is dependent on the availability of P, under P-rich and -deprived conditions. No significant change in the biomass was found at seedling stage; however, the difference in biomass was significant between colonized plants grown in P deprived conditions and non-colonized plants in rich P conditions at later stage. P. indica enhances biomass more efficiently in P-deprived condition than P-rich condition. The growth of colonized plant at 40 μM phosphate was equal to non-colonized plants grown at 400 μM indicating that P. indica can mimic the growth even at 10-fold lower P supplement. Bicompartment assay for ³²P transportation revealed that the fungal hyphae transport P to host plant in P-deprived condition but unable to transfer more P in P-rich condition though, there was no difference in the colonization at both the conditions. Hence, it has been concluded that P. indica has an ability to increase the biomass of the maize plant specifically under low phosphate condition thus; P. indica could be a good candidate for utilization in sustainable agriculture for the improvement of crop production in land deficient in P (Yadav et al., 2010; Kumar et al., 2011). Furthermore, RT-PCR analysis showed the expression of PiPT gene in P-deprived condition but not in P-rich condition. Therefore it was concluded that PiPT is actively involved in transporting P to the seedlings and that PiPT expression is dependent on the P availability. Though the mechanism for the transfer of P from P. indica to plant is not fully understood; however, it was hypothesized that Pi and organic P (such as polyphosphate) can be carried within the fungus by cytoplasmic streaming or by bulk flow to the plant root from external hyphae located in the soil (Kumar et al., 2011).

Conflicting results discussed above may be due to the host-specific nature of P. indica since all the studies were conducted on different crop plants. Therefore, a complete range of different host plants would only provide a clear picture of whether P. indica and PiPT are host-specific or not. Exploitation of P. indica and its PiPT not only can complement crop improvement strategies but may also serve as a model system to study molecular mechanism and indirect uptake of phosphate by plants (Yadav et al., 2010). Recently, the crystal structure of PiPT has been elucidated (Pedersen et al., 2013). With reference to the root colonization strategy of P. indica, i.e., the program cell death (Deshmukh et al., 2006), the authors emphasized that the main part of the root further develops and is not necrotized when colonized by the fungus. Hence, it was hypothesized that once the fungus releases phosphate into dead cells, it might be taken up by the non-affected living adjacent cells and further distribute into different parts of the plant (Deshmukh et al., 2006). Future research should be designed to perform gene function analysis studies in P. indica which has been a major constraint in genetic manipulation this fungus until now. In this context, the recently established electroporation-mediated transformation system based on the polyethylene glycol method for P. indica (Zuccaro et al., 2009) in combination with RNAi-mediated gene silencing (De Backer et al., 2002) have been suggested as major genetic engineering tools (Yadav et al., 2010).

P. indica and Acquisition of other Major Nutrients in Plants

Deficiency of other important nutrients such as nitrogen (N) (Xu et al., 2012) and zinc (Zn) (Tsonev and Lidon, 2012) in soil has been reported to restrict plant growth and development. Plants recruit N either as nitrate or ammonium but in some species by N fixation with the help of rhizobia (Esseling and Emons, 2004). Mycorrhizal fungi also play an important role in delivering either nitrate or ammonium to the root cells. It is believed that mycorrhizal fungi preferentially recruit ammonium rather than nitrate from the soil and that amino acids represent the major compounds that serve to transfer nitrogen to the host plant (Guescini et al., 2003). Sherameti et al. (2005) reported that the co-cultivation of Nicotiana tabaccum and Arabidopsis seedlings with P. indica is accompanied by a huge transfer of N from the agar plates into the aerial part of the seedlings. This effect is associated with activation of the NADH-dependent nitrate reductase (NR), the enzyme which plays a key role in nitrate acquisition in plants. However, the stimulation of nitrate assimilation by P. indica is the reason for the growth promotion is not known. P. indica activates NR which in turn plays a key role in nitrate acquisition and also a starch-degrading enzyme, glucan-water dikinase is involved in the early events of starch degradation in N. tabaccum and Arabidopsis. P. indica also activates the expression of the genes for the starch-degrading enzyme, glucan-water dikinase (SEX1) in roots which is involved in early events of starch degradation in N. tabaccum and Arabidopsis. Both the growth promotion and stimulation of the two enzymes do not require heterotrimeric G-proteins. P. indica also stimulates the expression of the uidA gene under the control of the Arabidopsis NR (Nia2) promoter in transgenic tobacco seedlings. A homeodomain transcription factor responds to the fungus and binds to promoter regions of the P. indica-responsive Nia2, SEX1, and 2-nitropropane dioxygenase genes, indicating that the expression of P. indica-responsive target genes may be controlled by common regulatory elements and trans-factors. It is proposed that the growth promoting effect initiated by P. indica is accompanied by a co-regulated stimulation of enzymes involved in nitrate and starch metabolisms. Application of bioinoculants prepared with the of fluorescent pseudomonas strains R81, and P. indica can efficiently promote growth in tomato plants probably due to the colonization strategies of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and P. indica (Sarma et al., 2011). It has also been suggested that the better root density of the inoculated plants facilitate and improve uptake of the nutrients from the rhizosphere. Fluorescent pseudomonad strain (R81) being a phosphate solubilizing strain (Roesti et al., 2006) and acid phosphatases produced by P. indica were reported to mobilize and assist L. esculentum plant in phosphate-acquisition, and growth promotion (Sarma et al., 2011). Recently, a model has been proposed to study an interaction between different strains of Azotobacter and P. indica (Bhuyan et al., 2015). The interaction with P. indica is proposed as a useful tool for mitigating zinc (Zn)-deficiency stress in Triticum aestivum (Abadi and Sepehri, 2015). Improved uptake of mineral nutrients, antioxidant enzyme activities, photosynthetic pigments, and low lipid peroxidation have been observed in T. aestivum plants under Zn-deficiency conditions with co-inoculation of two plant-growth-promoting microorganisms; Azotobacter chroococcum and P. indica (Abadi and Sepehri, 2015).

Seed Germination, Plant Growth and Development and Productivity

Piriformospora indica can also significantly mediate improvements in the growth and yield of various crop plants, horticultural and medicinal plants (Varma et al., 2001; Peškan-Berghöfer et al., 2004; Pham et al., 2004; Vadassery et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2009; Oelmüller et al., 2009; Achatz et al., 2010; Fakhro et al., 2010; Gosal et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2010). P. indica-induced seed germination and development have been reported in several crop plants (Varma et al., 2012a,b, 2013). P. indica-mediated seed development and enhanced seed production in A. thaliana were reported as a result of the pii-2 and At5g16590 located in the micro-domains of plasma membrane (Shahollari et al., 2007). P. indica-inoculated H. vulgare seeds exhibited higher viability (Harrach et al., 2013). Moreover, germinated seedlings immersed in P. indica-homogenate exhibited a good survival rate under adverse conditions (Harrach et al., 2013). P. indica filtrate can facilitate early seed germination in vascular plants (Adya et al., 2013). In Helianthus annus, P. indica culture filtrate was evidenced to influence the seed-oil yield (Bagde et al., 2011). A higher seed yield was also reported in the members of bryophytes, pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms as a result of the colonization of P. indica in their roots (Varma et al., 2012a,b) (Table 1).

The role of P. indica inoculation/colonization in medicinal plants has been considered of utmost significance (Das et al., 2012). The colonization of P. indica has been reported in a number of medicinal plants including Coleus forskohlii, Bacopa monnieri, Stevia rebaudiana, Artemisia annua, Linum album, Trigonella foenumgraecum, Spilanthes calva, Withania somniferra, Chlorophytum borivilianum, Curcuma longa, Podophyllum peltatum, Azadirachta indica, Oscimum sanctum, Linum album and Lantana camara (Oelmüller et al., 2009; Das et al., 2012; Sharma and Agarwal, 2013; Kumar et al., 2013, 2015; Ahlawat et al., 2015) (Table 2). Increased contents of chemical compounds and secondary metabolites were reported in P. indica-colonized C. forskohlii (Das et al., 2012). P. indica has also been reported to enhance the growth, bacoside endogenous level, antioxidant activity as well as hypertrophy of nuclei in B. monnieri (Prasad et al., 2013). Medicinal properties of A. indica, A. elegans, and H. annuus were increased with their colonization with P. indica (Bagde et al., 2010b). P. indica-inoculation in L. album cell culture improved the production of anticancer drug podophyllotoxin (Kumar et al., 2013). Leaf area and fresh biomass were improved in herbaceous plants namely S. rebaudiana and A. annua with their cultivation with P. indica (Varma et al., 2013). Earlier, Rai et al. (2001) reported a positive response of the growth of medicinal plants such as S. calva and W. somnifera in a field trial with P. indica inoculum (Table 2). Recently, in vitro co-cultivation of P. indica filtrate was reported to improve biomass productivity in A. annua and W. somniferra (Ahlawat et al., 2015; Baishya et al., 2015). Cell suspension cultures of W. somnifera offers the potential for continuous production of withaferin A (Ahlawat et al., 2015). Further, it can be concluded that the symbiotic effect of P. indica can be used as a biopriming agent for the overall growth of plant biomass.

On the perspective of P. indica colonization role in crop plants, P. indica-mediated improvements in the growth and biomass have been reported in a number of crop plants including Oryza sativa, Saccharum officinarum, Abrus precatorius, Zea mays, Phaseolus vulgaris, and Tridax procumbans (Prasad, 2008; Varma et al., 2012a,b, 2013, 2014). P. indica can produce auxin (IAA) which in turn can promote plant root growth (Sirrenberg et al., 2007). In contrast to the auxin mediated least impact on the regulation of the gene expression in Arabidopsis (Vadassery et al., 2008), auxin regulated gene expression was found upregulated in H. vulgare (Schäfer et al., 2009) and Chinese cabbage (Lee et al., 2011). Interestingly, P. indica has been reported to interfere with ethylene signaling in plants where, it promotes the plant growth (Barazani et al., 2007). However, the exact mechanism underlying P. indica-mediated ethylene signaling inhibition is still unclear in plants (Hayat et al., 2010). The stimulation of secondary metabolite synthesis by the endophytic fungus, P. indica has also been reported for the production of pentacyclic triterpenoids (e.g., ursolic acid, oleanolic acid and betulinic acid) in the suspension cultures of L. camara (Kumar et al., 2015).

Abiotic and Biotic Stress Tolerance

Piriformospora indica has been extensively reported to improve crop tolerance to a number of abiotic stresses including salinity, low temperature and heavy metal toxicity (Baltruschat et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2010; Husaini et al., 2012; Zarea et al., 2012; Ansari et al., 2013; Unnikumar et al., 2013). P. indica colonization-mediated high salinity tolerance was reported in Triticum aestivum (Zarea et al., 2012), that of drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings (Sherameti et al., 2008), Chinese cabbage (Sun et al., 2010) and strawberry (Husaini et al., 2012). P. indica colonization has extensively been reported to mediate the activation of defense related genes (such as PR, LOX2, and ERF1 genes) (Zarea et al., 2012), abiotic stress responsive genes (DREB2A, CBL1, RD29A) (Ansari et al., 2013) and osmoprotectants (proline, glycine betaine) (Waller et al., 2005; Trivedi et al., 2013) (Figure 3). The interaction of P. indica with A. thaliana roots is a unique model system to study symbiotic relationships. Recently, Vahabi et al. (2015) has reported a co-cultivation system which allowed them to investigate the effects of fungal exudates on the root transcriptome before and after the establishment of a physical contact, and during early phases of root colonization.

FIGURE 3

Keurentjes et al. (2011). Copyright Trends in Plant Science, Elsevier).

Mutualistic fungi P. indica has also evolved the ability to deliver molecules, called effectors, inside the cells to enhance microbial infection, and manipulate the host metabolism (Kloppholz et al., 2011; Plett et al., 2014). The effector protein is involved in the establishment and maintenance of symbiosis in endo- and ectomycorrhiza, allowing the fungus to manipulate the plant defense response (Kloppholz et al., 2011; Plett et al., 2011, 2014). Recently, Akum et al. (2015) reported the function of P. indica effector candidate PIIN_08944, a non-DELD effector, during the interaction of plants with P. indica. The authors noted the contribution of the candidate effector to plant colonization where the mutualistic fungus suppressed the salicylate -mediated basal resistance response (Akum et al., 2015). Effector protein, PIIN_08944 expression was detected during chlamydospore germination, and fungal deletion mutants (Pi_Δ08944) showed delayed root colonization. PIIN_08944-expressing A. thaliana showed a reduced expression of flg22-induced marker genes of pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and the SA-defense pathway. In H. vulgare, the expression of PIIN_08944 reduced the burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) triggered by flg22. Therefore, PIIN_08944 was advocated to contribute to the root colonization by P. indica by interfering with SA-mediated basal immune responses of the host plant (Akum et al., 2015).

Piriformospora indica has also been reported to modulate major antioxidant defense enzymes monodehydroascorbate reductase and dehydroascorbate reductase (Vadassery et al., 2009; White and Torres, 2010; Foyer and Shigeoka, 2011; Hamilton et al., 2012) and the other components of ROS-scavenging system (Waller et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2010). P. indica-colonization was reported to mediate the up-regulation in a number of enzymes involved in ROS-metabolism in salinity exposed plants (Baltruschat et al., 2008). In addition, the establishment of ROS-scavenging system as a result of P. indica inoculation has been reported to confer plant tolerance to major abiotic stresses including salinity, drought, heat and heavy metal, and protection against fungal and viral pathogens (Waller et al., 2005; Serfling et al., 2007; Kumar et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2010; Ansari et al., 2013). Interestingly, down-regulation of genes encoding enzymes for ascorbate synthesis in Arabidopsis exhibited a greater colonization by this endophyte (Vadassery et al., 2009). However, a greenhouse study of ‘Hildares’ tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) inoculation with P. indica under osmotic stress and specific chloride toxicity conditions showed insignificant increases in the growth of P. indica-inoculated plants grown under severe salinity stress, and the responses corresponded a significant increase in CO₂ assimilation rate in the final harvest and leaf water potential and transpiration rate in the first harvest (Al-Absi and Al-Ameiri, 2015). Though the mechanisms underlying P. indica-induced resistance has already been much explained for abiotic and biotic stress response in rhizobacteria-colonized plants little is known for mechanisms underpinning P. indica-induced resistance in abiotic and biotic stressed-plants (Van Wees et al., 2008).

Piriformospora indica has its well defined roles in the protection of plants against a range of biotic stress factors such as pathogenic fungi, bacteria and virus (Waller et al., 2005; Serfling et al., 2007; Oelmüller et al., 2009; Camehl et al., 2010, 2013; Molitor et al., 2011; Dolatabadi et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2013). The analyses of the beneficial interaction between P. indica and host plants has revealed the upregulation of various defense related genes including pathogenesis related PR genes, jasmonate JA (VSP, PDF1.2, LOX2) and ethylene ET (ERF1) signaling genes in response to pathogen attack (Camehl et al., 2010; Molitor et al., 2011) (Figure 3). P. indica has found to confer protection to H. vulgare plant against root damage caused by Fusarium culmorum and against shoot infection with Blumeria graminis (Waller et al., 2005). Many root pathogens have been found to be directly inhibited by antagonistic activities of the endophytic fungus except F. culmorum (Waller et al., 2005), P. herpotrichoides (Serfling et al., 2007), F. oxysporum (Dolatabadi et al., 2012). To the other, systemically induced resistance by P. indica root-colonization has also been reported for many leaf pathogens. Recently, in root endophyte-colonized H. vulgare plants, a sub-set of defense-related genes was observed highly induced by leaf pathogens (Molitor et al., 2011). The role of P. indica in the protection of a number of plants against losses due to fungal pathogens infection has been summarized in Table 1.

Piriformospora indica has been credibly reported to defend crop plants against attack of viral as well as fungal pathogens and thereby providing them a better vegetative or generative development (Camehl et al., 2013). Recently, P. indica has been found to provide massive bioprotective potential to economically important different agricultural and horticultural crops against various plant pathogens and insect pests attack (Varma et al., 2012a). P. indica fungus could be utilized to increase fungal disease resistance in plants where, P. indica-infested crop plants were reported to exhibit their additional resistant against pathogenic fungi (Waller et al., 2005). H. vulgare plants subjected to the fungal pathogen such as F. culmorum, become free from root diseases when colonized with P. indica. Similarly, P. indica treated plants were also protected against root-pathogenic Cochliobolus sativus fungus (Oelmüller et al., 2009). P. indica fungus-mediated improved resistance of H. vulgare has been noted against the attack of root- and leaf-pathogens such as Fusarium culmorum and Blumeria graminis (Waller et al., 2005). Recently, P. indica colonized H. vulgare roots incited systemic resistance against the biotrophic leaf pathogen B. graminis f. sp. hordei (Molitor et al., 2011). P. indica was reported to be an effective candidate in biocontrol of take-all diseases of T. aestivum (such as Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) (Ghahfarokhi and Goltapeh, 2010) and Fusarium wilt disease of lentil (Dolatabadi et al., 2012). Greenhouse experiments on P. indica-colonization with winter T. aestivum’s roots were resulted into significant reduced of incidence of leaf, stem, and root diseass caused by B. graminis f. sp. tritici, Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides and F. culmorum. In a field trial, P. herpotrichoides infection was considerably decreased in endophyte-colonized plants. Systemic resistance against B. graminis attack was induced in P. indica-colonized plants (Serfling et al., 2007). P. indica-induced powdery mildew (Golovinomyces orontii) resistance in Arabidopsis necessitated JA-signaling involving JA-regulated genes to confer G. orontii tolerance. Furthermore, fungus has been evidenced to require merely cytosolic and not nuclear localized NPR1 to provoke systemic induced resistance in Arabidopsis (Stein et al., 2008). Recent reports have evidenced that P. indica-induced GA can positively modulate plant defense response in roots. It has similar potential to induce systemic resistance (ISR) like Trichoderma spp. Pathogens attack requires basic compatibility to attain with their host plants involving definite upstream regulatory genes. The key mechanism has been defined either in rhizobacteria-mediated ISR or by plant inoculation with P. indica. Nevertheless, the majority of expression studies regarding P. indica-host communication center on root physiology. Further, systemic stimulation of a small number of defense-related genes or proteins have been depicted based on more or less a similar mechanism (Shoresh et al., 2010; Camehl et al., 2013).

Piriformospora indica-Interaction with other Microorganisms

Piriformospora indica interaction (antagonism and cooperation) with other microorganisms has been reported to improve plant protection against environmental stresses (Pham et al., 2004; Porras-Alfaro and Bayman, 2011). P. indica interacts with a diverse group of microorganisms such as Sebacina vermifera, Pseudomonas fluorescens (rhizobacteria), Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, G. graminis, and other soil fungi (i.e., Aspergillus niger, A. sydowii and Rhizopus stolonifer). P. indica invaded H. vulgare roots were reported resistant against Fusarium infections (Deshmukh et al., 2007). These authors provided evidences that pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins do not affect P. indica-mediated response to confer resistance against Fusarium infections. P. indica was found to diminish the severity of disease caused by V. dahliae (Fakhro et al., 2010). The interaction of P. indica with the Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV) was evaluated in hydroponically grown L. esculentum where, the authors observed 30% reduction on the disease severity by V. dahliae (Fakhro et al., 2010). The growth of pathogenic fungi such as A. sydowii, R. stolonifer and A. niger has been reported to be entirely obstructed by P. indica. However, stimulation was noticed in the growth of the alga such as C. reinhardtii when cultured with P. indica. Though P. indica interacts with diverse class of bryophyte including mosses and liverworts but no growth promotion has been reported as a result of the interaction (Pham et al., 2004).

Among the Sebacinales, P. indica shows its interaction with S. vermifera in addition to multinucleate Rhizoctonia (Schäfer and Kogel, 2009). The pure cultures of closely related species such as P. indica and S. vermifera were reported essential for the germination, growth, development and yield and herbivore resistance of Nicotiana attenuate (Barazani et al., 2005). It has been reported that P. indica, S. vermifera and Trichoderma species act as effective biocontrol agent for take-all diseases in T. aestivum (Ghahfarokhi and Goltapeh, 2010). P. indica has been reported to support the growth and development of Azotobacter chroococcum, Azospirillum brasilensis, and Bradyrhizobium sp.; however, P. indica-mediated inhibition was noted in Pseudomonas fluorescens (Malla and Pokhare, 2008). Interestingly, there is an evidence that P. indica subsist rod-shaped 1–1.5 μm long bacteria in its cytoplasm and is characterized as Rhizobium radiobacter (Sharma et al., 2008). In a field experiment, P. indica-colonized plants exhibited significantly reduced disease severity caused by P. herpotrichoides (Serfling et al., 2007). P. indica and R. leguminosarum inoculated Phaseolus bean along with vermicompost revealed enhanced length and dry weight of both root as well as shoot with respect to treatment either deficient in vermicompost or with single inoculation (Tuladhar et al., 2013). P. indica either alone or in an interaction with S. vermifera, Trichoderma viride and T. harzianum was found to be more effective in reducing the severity of Fusarium wilt disease of lenti (Dolatabadi et al., 2012).

The studies on 18S rRNA and 20S rRNA sequence identity have revealed the fact that P. indica is closed relatives to the Rhizoctonia group and Sebacinaceae (Basidiomycetes) (Singh et al., 2003). In adition, P. indica affinity with Glomeromycota members such as Glomerales, Diversisporales as well as Archeosporales has been deciphered through P. indica characterization via immunofluorescence, Western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay along with immuno-gold (Singh et al., 2003). In response to signals from P. indica, MATH protein, LRR1, LRR2, PDK, OXII, MAPK genes were upregulated in the roots of A. thalina prior to colonization (Vadassery et al., 2009). On the other hand, [Ca²⁺]_cyt either induced various signaling course of actions, or defense interrelated responses were suppressed by supplementary factors (e.g., effectors) liberated by the fungus. These signaling events may be useful to understand the interactions of other beneficial fungi associated with economically important diverse crops for possible biotechnological applications (Oelmüller et al., 2009; Varma et al., 2013).

Piriformospora indica – Biotechnological Significance-Appraisal

P. indica as a Bio-control Agent and Plant Stress Response Mediator

It is believed that P. indica-colonization results into the activation of antioxidant system, which in turn improves crop plant tolerance against abiotic as well as biotic stresses (Prasad et al., 2013). The bio-protection performance of P. indica in T. aestivum has been evidenced against B. graminis f. sp. tritici, P. herpotrichoides and Fusarium culmorum (Serfling et al., 2007), and in Z. mays against the root parasite Fusarium verticillioides (Kumar et al., 2009). The fungus colonized plants were less susceptible to Alternaria alternate and Colletotrichum falcatu compared to non-colonized plants (Varma et al., 2012a). The ability of P. indica to synthesize hydroxamic acids – a secondary metabolite has been reported, which functions like a natural pesticide (Varma et al., 2001). The significance of P. indica as a bio-fertilizer as well as a bio-control agent has been strongly advocated (Waller et al., 2005; Varma et al., 2012a,b). Now, P. indica has become a paramount important candidate in microbiological and biotechnological research revealing several positive consequences on diverse crop plants (Barazani and Baldwin, 2013).

Ethylene, a gaseous plant hormone is produced in the majority of plant cells and controls various aspects of plant growth and development. Its positive and/or negative consequences has already been realized on flower, fruit ripening and leaf epinasty and abscission, suppression of apical dominance, leaf senescence, PCD, root nodulation, seed dormancy, seed germination and responsiveness to environmental stress including pathogen attack (Sharafzadeh, 2012; Varma et al., 2012a,b). The beneficial interaction of A. thaliana roots with mutualistic root endophytic fungus P. indica has been reported to induce ethylene, a gaseous plant hormone (Khatabi et al., 2012). Ethylene contributed a significant role in retaining the stability between beneficial as well as non-beneficial traits via signaling components ETR1, EIN2 and EIN2/EIL1 in a P. indica mutualism with plant’s roots (Camehl et al., 2010). In another study, the P. indica induced methionine synthase activity was reported to facilitate methionine cycle of ethylene biosynthetic pathway (Peškan-Berghöfer et al., 2004) during its colonization with plant roots via immuno suppression explaining surprisingly broad host range of the fungus (Jacobs et al., 2011). In a DNA microarray study, expression analysis of gene of P. indica colonized H. vulgare roots depicted differentially expressed ethylene related genes (Schäfer et al., 2009). Ethylene was reported to positively modulate the P. indica-plant interaction via signal molecules of fungi as well as plant receptors at the root cells surface after landing the fungal spores to attain the desired compatibility. Interestingly, ethylene signal magnitude also plays an important part in the colonization of plant roots by P. indica; where, ethylene signaling either inhibits or promotes the growth of hyphae depending upon magnitude of signaling (Camehl et al., 2013). It is now clear that to establish the symbiosis, ethylene signaling network requires definite biochemical or genetic actions to sustain a communication across the symbionts as well as host plants to provide physiological benefits to each partner (Ansari et al., 2013).

P. indica as a Regulator of Genes Involved in Plant Metabolism and Mineral Uptake

Piriformospora indica interaction studies in Arabidopsis and H. vulgare have provided molecular basis of the beneficial plant–microbe interaction (Sherameti et al., 2005; Achatz et al., 2010; Yadav et al., 2010; Ngwene et al., 2013; Pedersen et al., 2013). The fungus in a mutual interaction with plants has already been known to provide enhanced nitrate/nitrogen uptake (Sherameti et al., 2005; Yadav et al., 2010). The up-regulation of Nia2 gene of NR and SEX1 gene of starch degrading enzymes was reported to influence a substantial source and sink relation (Sherameti et al., 2005). The additional sinks were remained balanced via higher rates of CO₂ assimilation in H. vulgare plants colonized by P. indica with respect to the subsequent controls (Achatz et al., 2010). The elevated N, P and K endogenous content were reported in chickpea as well as black lentil plants colonized with P. indica (Nautiyal et al., 2010). In contrast, Fe and Cu deficiencies in sugar cane plants were surpassed if inoculated with P. indica (Gosal et al., 2011). The expression profile of receptor kinase in roots of Arabidopsis and enhanced uptake of radio-labeled P was observed after colonization of the endophytic fungus (Shahollari et al., 2005). P. indica-mediated P-uptake and transport were evidenced to improve plant growth and development via their impact on various regulatory, structural and addition to energy transfer processes (Kumar et al., 2011). Further, reduced endogenous content of phosphate in Z. mays plants were detected upon its colonization by P. indica mutant where, a phosphate transporter was knocked out (Yadav et al., 2010; Ngwene et al., 2013).

P. indica as a Regulator of Genes Involved in Plant Stress Resistance and Defense

Piriformospora indica colonization provides certain benefits to the host plant such as tolerance to high salt and drought, resistance against heavy metal toxicity and protection from pathogen attack (Unnikumar et al., 2013). P. indica colonized T. aestivum showed an optimum growth under rising concentrations of salt (Zarea et al., 2012). Plants such as Arabidopsis, Chinese cabbage and strawberry were recovered from drought stress when pre-inoculated with endophyte P. indica (Sherameti et al., 2008; Husaini et al., 2012). The expression profile of the drought responsive genes such as DREB2A, ANAC072, CBL1 in addition to RD29A were positively modulated in the leaves of P. indica-colonized plants under drought stress exposure (Sun et al., 2010). The drought tolerance was exhibited as higher endogenous proline level which in turn led to increased tolerance to osmotic stress in endophyte colonized plants when compared to non-colonized one (Zarea et al., 2012). H. vulgare plants pre-inoculated with P. indica displayed augmented profile of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants levels resulting increased tolerant to drought and high salt (Baltruschat et al., 2008). The increased antioxidants level was evident by reduced dehydroascorbate level via dehydroascorbate conversion to ascorbate and elevated glutathione level (Waller et al., 2005). The stress tolerance response of P. indica-colonized plants was found to be associated with burst accumulation of plastid-localized proteins such as Ca²⁺-sensing regulator (CAS) in the leaves of colonized plants (Sun et al., 2010). The use of P. indica was found to be more effective in improving salt stress tolerance in crop plants that consequently has opened an innovative and promising application of this fungus in sustainable agriculture, especially in the areas affected by salinity (Zarea et al., 2013). The differential expression profile of abiotic stress responsive genes putatively engaged in various stress response in P. indica-colonized plants is required for in-depth interpretation of the mechanism functions via induction of osmoprotectants and heat shock proteins in plant cell (Waller et al., 2005; Vadassery et al., 2009; Zarea et al., 2013).

In P. indica-inoculated host plants, pathogenesis related PR genes, JA (VSP, PDF1.2, LOX2) and ethylene ET (ERF1) signaling genes were reported up-regulated in response to pathogen attack (Camehl et al., 2010; Molitor et al., 2011). P. indica mediated H. vulgare plant protection was first observed against F. culmorum and B. graminis in root and shoot part, respectively (Waller et al., 2005). Enhanced antioxidant defense system has been evidenced as a major factor involved in P. indica colonization mediated beneficial effects in H. vulgare, T. aestivum and Z. mays roots (Waller et al., 2005; Serfling et al., 2007; Kumar et al., 2009). It is also evident from mutant study that not nuclear but the cytosolic non-expressor of PR-genes 1 (NPR1) form is required by the fungus in order to induce systemic resistance (Stein et al., 2008). For this reason, the mechanisms involved in P. indica-induced resistance in plants is more or less similar to systemic resistance induced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-colonized plants (Van Wees et al., 2008). The endophyte provides inducing systemic resistance against pathogenic fungi and also protects the plant against damages caused by the invading pathogens via direct antagonism (Johnson et al., 2013).

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Piriformospora indica is a mycorrhiza like endophytic fungus which exhibits its versatility for colonizing the plant species with direct manipulation of plant hormone signaling and induces both local and systemic resistance to several fungal and viral plant diseases through signal transduction. P. indica is multifunctional in providing its services such as nutrient uptake, disease resistance, stress tolerance and growth-promotion (Unnikumar et al., 2013). This fungus has become an outstanding tool for biological hardening during transplantation of micro-propagated plantlets. P. indica-infestation in a number of medicinal plants has been reported to stimulate the synthesis of valuable secondary metabolites (Bagde et al., 2010a; Prasad et al., 2013), therefore possess commercial and biotechnological importance. The comparison of the P. indica genome with other fungi has revealed its classical features related with biotrophism as well as saprotrophism (Deshmukh et al., 2006; Qiang et al., 2011). P. indica has also evolved highly effective colonization strategies in diverse plant species (Deshmukh et al., 2006; Schäfer and Kogel, 2009; Qiang et al., 2011). The significant number of reports accumulated during last one decade has confirmed the P. indica-mediated improvements in the growth and yield of various plants, which includes crop plants, horticultural and medicinal plants. These reports also support the role of P. indica in crop tolerance to a number of abiotic as well as biotic stresses. Therefore, P. indica can be used as: (i) bio-control agent and plant stress response mediator, (ii) regulator of genes involved in metabolism and mineral uptake, and (iii) regulator of genes involved in resistance and defense of plants. It needs elaboration of a few studies done on the role of nano(bio)technology in acheiving major insights into and benefits of plant-interaction with fungi/P. indica (Suman et al., 2010; Menezes et al., 2015; Pandey et al., 2015; Prasad et al., 2015b). Furthermore, in order to commercially exploit the potentialities of P. indica in improving biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants, in addition to establishing P. indica inoculum production conditions and its formulation and stability; and exploring the persistence of the fungus in the environment, the future research should focus on revealing: (i) the mechanisms underpinning broad compatibility in root symbiosis, (ii) functional analyses of the effector-like proteins, (iii) symbiosis determinants, and (iv) identification of novel symbiosis/pathogenicity genes.

References

• 1

  AbadiV. A. J. M.SepehriM. (2015). Effect of Piriformospora indica and Azotobacter chroococcum on mitigation of zinc deficiency stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Symbiosis1–11. 10.1007/s13199-015-0361-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  AchatzB.RudenS. V.AndradeD.NeumannE.KuhnemannJ. P.KogelK. H.et al (2010). Root colonization by Piriformospora indica enhances grain yield in barley under diverse nutrient regimes by accelerating plant development.Plant Soil33359–70. 10.1007/s11104-010-0319-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AdyaA. K.GautamA.ZhangL.VarmaA. (2013). “Characterization of Piriformospora indica culture filtrate,” in Sebacinales - Forms, Functions and Biotechnological Applications, Soil Biology Series No. 33, edsVarmaA.KostG.OelmullerR. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 345–375.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  AhlawatA.SaxenaA.AbdinM. Z. (2015). Piriformospora indica elicitation of withaferin A biosynthesis and biomass accumulation in cell suspension cultures of Withania somnifera.Symbiosis1–10.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  AkumF. N.SteinbrennerJ.BiedenkopfD.ImaniJ.KogelK. H. (2015). The Piriformospora indica effector PIIN_08944 promotes the mutualistic Sebacinalean symbiosis.Front. Plant Sci.6:906. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00906

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  Al-AbsiK.Al-AmeiriN. (2015). Physiological responses of tomato to inoculation with Piriformospora indica under osmotic stress and chloride toxicity.Intl. J. Agric. Forest5226–239.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  AlikhaniM.KhatabiB.SepehriM.NekoueiM. K.MardiM.SalekdehG. H. (2013). A proteomics approach to study the molecular basis of enhanced salt tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) conferred by the root mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica.Mol. Biosys.91498–1510. 10.1039/c3mb70069k

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  AnithK. N.SreekumarA.SreekumarJ. (2015). The growth of tomato seedlings inoculated with co-cultivated Piriformospora indica and Bacillus pumilus.Symbiosis659–16. 10.1007/s13199-015-0313-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  AnsariM. W.BainsG.ShuklaA.PantR. C.TutejaN. (2013). Low temperature stress ethylene and not Fusarium might be responsible for mango malformation.Plant Physiol. Biochem.6934–38. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.04.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  AnsariM. W.GillS. S.TutejaN. (2014). Piriformospora indica a powerful tool for crop improvement.Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad.80317–324. 10.16943/ptinsa/2014/v80i2/55109

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  ApelK.HirtH. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.55373–399. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  BagdeU. S.PrasadR.VarmaA. (2010a). Interaction of Piriformospora indica with medicinal plants and of economic importance.Afr. J. Biotechnol.99214–9226.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  BagdeU. S.PrasadR.VarmaA. (2010b). Mass cultivation of Piriformospora indica in New Brunswick Fermenter and its formulation as biofertilizer.Asian J. Microbial. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci12911–916.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  BagdeU. S.PrasadR.VarmaA. (2011). Influence of culture filtrate of Piriformospora indica on growth and yield of seed oil in Helianthus annus.Symbiosis5383–88. 10.1007/s13199-011-0114-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  BagdeU. S.PrasadR.VarmaA. (2014). Impact of culture filtrate of Piriformospora indica on biomass and biosynthesis of active ingredient aristolochic acid in Aristolochia elegans Mart.Intl. J. Biol.129–37.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  BaishyaD.DekaP.KalitaM. (2015). In vitro co-cultivation of Piriformospora indica filtrate for improve biomass productivity in Artemisia annua (L.).Symbiosis661–10. 10.1007/s13199-015-0331-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  BajajR.AgarwalA.RajpalK.AsthanaS.KumarR.PrasadR.et al (2014). Co-cultivation of Curcuma longa with Piriformospora indica enhances the yield and active ingredients.Am. J. Curr. Microbiol.26–17.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  BalemiT.NegishoK. (2012). Management of soil phosphorus and plant adaptation mechanisms to phosphorus stress for sustainable crop production: a review.J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.12547–562.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  BaltruschatH.FodorJ.HarrachB. D.NiemczykE.BarnaB.GullnerG.et al (2008). Salt tolerance of barley induced by the root endophyte Piriform ospora indica is associated with a strong increase in antioxidants.New Phytol.180501–510. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02583.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  BarazaniO.BaldwinI. T. (2013). “A mixed bag: the plant growth-promoting Sebacina vermifera impairs defense mechanisms against herbivores,” in Sebacinales - Forms, Functions and Biotechnological Applications, Soil Biology Series No. 33, edsVarmaA.KostG.OelmullerR. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 251–262.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  BarazaniO.BenderothM.GrotenK.KuhlemeierC.BaldwinI. T. (2005). Piriformospora indica and Sebacina vermifera increase growth performance at the expense of herbivore resistance in Nicotiana attenuata.Oecologia146234–243. 10.1007/s00442-005-0193-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  BarazaniO.Von DahlC. C.BaldwinI. T. (2007). Sebacina vermifera promotes the growth and fitness of Nicotiana attenuata by inhibiting ethylene signaling.Plant Physiol.1441223–1232. 10.1104/pp.107.097543

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  BecquerA.TrapJ.IrshadU.AliM. A.ClaudeP. (2014). From soil to plant, the journey of P through trophic relationships and ectomycorrhizal association.Front. Plant Sci.5:548. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00548

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  BhuyanS. K.BandyopadhyayP.KumarP.KumarP.MishraD.PrasadR.et al (2015). Interaction of Piriformospora indica with Azotobacter chroococcum.Sci. Rep.5:13911. 10.1038/srep13911

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  CamehlI.OelmüllerR. (2010). Do ethylene response factors-9 and -14 repress PR gene expression in the interaction between Piriformospora indica and Arabidopsis?Plant Signal. Behav.5932–936. 10.4161/psb.5.8.12036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  CamehlI.SherametiI.SeebaldE.MichalJ.OelmüllerR. (2013). “Role of defense compounds in the beneficial interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana and Piriformospora indica,” in Sebacinales - Forms, Functions and Biotechnological Applications, Soil Biology Series No. 33, edsVarmaA.KostG.OelmullerR. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 239–250.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  CamehlI.SherametiI.VenusY.BethkeG.VarmaA.LeeJ.et al (2010). Ethylene signalling and ethylene-targeted transcription factors are required to balance beneficial and nonbeneficial traits in the symbiosis between the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica and Arabidopsis thaliana.New Phytol.1851062–1073. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03149.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  DasA.KamalS.Shakil NajamA.SherametiI.OelmullerR.DuaM.et al (2012). The root endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica leads to early flowering, higher biomass and altered secondary metabolites of the medicinal plant, Coleus forskohlii. Plant Signal. Behav. 71–10. 10.4161/psb.7.1.18472

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  DasA.PrasadR.SrivastavaR. B.DeshmukhS.RaiM. K.VarmaA. (2013). “Cocultivation of Piriformospora indica with medicinal plants: case studies,” in Sebacinales – Forms, Functions and Biotechnological Applications, Soil Biology Series No. 33, edsVarmaA.KostG.OelmullerR. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 149–172.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  DasA.TripathiS.VarmaA. (2014). In vitro plant development and root colonization of Coleus forskohlii by Piriformospora indica.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.301075–1084. 10.1007/s11274-013-1526-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  De BackerM. D.RaponiM.ArndtG. M. (2002). RNA-mediated gene silencing in non- pathogenic and pathogenic fungi.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.5323–329. 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00319-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  DeshmukhS.HückelhovenR.SchäferP.ImaniJ.SharmaM.WeissM.et al (2006). The root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica requires host cell death for proliferation during mutualistic symbiosis with barley.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10318450–18457. 10.1073/pnas.0605697103

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  DeshmukhS.HueckelhovenR.SchaeferP.ImaniJ.SharmaM.WeissM.et al (2007). Piriformospora indica protects barley from root rot caused by Fusarium graminearum.J. Plant Dis. Protect.114263–268.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  DeshmukhS. D.KogelK. H. (2007). Piriformospora indica protects barley from root rot caused by Fusarium graminearum.J. Plant Dis. Protect.114263–268.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  DolatabadiH. K.GoltapehE. M.MohammadiN.RabieyM.RohaniN.VarmaA. (2012). Biocontrol potential of root endophytic fungi and Trichoderma species against Fusarium wilt of lentil under in vitro and greenhouse conditions.J. Agric. Sci. Technol.14407–420.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  EsselingJ. J.EmonsA. M. (2004). Dissection of Nod fact or signalling in legumes: cell biology, mutants and pharmacological approaches.J. Microscopy214104–113. 10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01322.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  FakhroA.Andrade-LinaresD. R.von BargenS.BandteM.ButtnerC.GroschR.et al (2010). Impact of Piriformospora indica on tomato growth and on interaction with fungal and viral pathogens.Mycorrhiza20191–200. 10.1007/s00572-009-0279-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  FoyerC. H.ShigeokaS. (2011). Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis.Plant Physiol.15593–100. 10.1104/pp.110.166181

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39

  GhabooliM. (2014). Effect of Piriformospora indica inoculation on some physiological traits of barley (Hordeum vulgare) under salt stress.Chem. Nat. Compd.501082–1087. 10.1007/s10600-014-1164-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  GhabooliM.KhatabiB.AhmadiF. S.SepehriM.MirzaeiM.AmirkhaniA.et al (2013). Proteomics study reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying water stress tolerance induced by Piriformospora indica in barley.J. Proteomics94289–301. 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.09.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41

  GhahfarokhiR. M.GoltapehM. E. (2010). Potential of the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica; Sebacina vermifera and Trichoderma species in biocontrol of take-all disease of wheat Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in vitro.J. Agric. Technol.611–18.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 42

  GhanemG.EwaldA.ZercheS.HennigF. (2014). Effect of root colonization with Piriformospora indica and phosphate availability on the growth and reproductive biology of a Cyclamen persicum cultivar.Sci. Hortic.172233–241. 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.04.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 43

  GosalS. K.KarlupiaA.GosalS. S.ChhibbaI. M.VarmaA. (2010). Biotization with Piriformospora indica and Pseudomonas fluorescens improves survival rate, nutrient acquisition, field performance and saponin content of micropropagated Chlorophytum sp.Indian J. Biotechnol.9289–297.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 44

  GosalS. K.SharmaM.GosalS. S.ChhibbaI. M.BhatnagarK.VarmaA. (2011). Biohardening with Piriformospora indica improves survival rate, growth, iron uptake and cane yield of micropropagated sugarcane.Int. Sugar J.113382–388.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 45

  GuesciniM.PierleoniR.PalmaF.ZeppaS.ValloraniL.PotenzaL.et al (2003). Characterization of the Tuber borchiinitrate reductase gene and its role in ectomycorrhizae.Mol. Genet. Genomics.269807–816. 10.1007/s00438-003-0894-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 46

  HamiltonC. E.GundelP. E.HelanderM.SaikkonenK. (2012). Endophytic mediation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant activity in plants: a review.Fungal Divers.541–10. 10.1007/s13225-012-0158-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 47

  HarrachB. D.BaltruschatH.BarnaB.FodorJ. K.OgelK. H. (2013). The mutualistic fungus Piriformosporaindica protects barley roots from a loss of antioxidant capacity caused by the necrotrophic pathogen Fusariumculmorum.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact26599–605. 10.1094/MPMI-09-12-0216-R

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 48

  HarrisonM. J. (2005). Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.5919–42. 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 49

  HayatR.AliS.AmaraU.KhalidR.AhmedI. (2010). Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review.Ann. Microbiol.60579–598. 10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 50

  HeathM. C. (1998). Apoptosis, programmed cell death and the hypersensitive response.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.104117–124. 10.1023/A:1008645520976

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 51

  HeathM. C. (2000). Hypersensitive response-related death.Plant Mol. Biol.44312–334. 10.1023/A:1026592509060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 52

  HilbertM.VollL. M.DingY.HofmannJ.SharmaM.ZuccaroA. (2012). Indole derivative production by the root endophyte Piriformospora indica is not required for growth promotion but for biotrophic colonization of barley roots.New Phytol.196520–534. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04275.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 53

  HoeberichtsF. A.WolteringE. J. (2003). Multiple mediators of plant programmed cell death: interplay of conserved cell death mechanisms and plant-specific regulators.Bioessays2547–57. 10.1002/bies.10175

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 54

  HückelhovenR. (2004). BAX Inhibitor-1 an ancient cell death suppressor in animals and plants with prokaryotic relatives.Apoptosis9299–307. 10.1023/B:APPT.0000025806.71000.1c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 55

  HuiF.LiuJ.GaoQ.LouB. (2015). Piriformospora indica confers cadmium tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum.J. Environ. Sci.37184–191. 10.1016/j.jes.2015.06.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 56

  HusainiA. M.AbdinM. Z.KhanS.XuY. W.AquilS.AnisM. (2012). Modifying strawberry for better adaptability to adverse impact of climate change.Curr. Sci.1021660–1673.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 57

  JacobsS.ZechmannB.MolitorA.TrujilloM.PetutschnigE.LipkaV.et al (2011). Broad-spectrum suppression of innate immunity is required for colonization of Arabidopsis roots by the fungus Piriformospora indica.Plant Physiol.156726–740. 10.1104/pp.111.176446

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 58

  JogawatA.SahaS.BakshiM.DayamanV.KumarM.DuaM.et al (2013). Piriformospora indica rescues growth diminution of rice seedlings during high salt stress.Plant Signal. Behav.8e26891. 10.4161/psb.26891

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 59

  JohnsonJ. M.SherametiI.NongbriP. L.OelmüllerR. (2013). “Standardized conditions to study beneficial and nonbeneficial traits in the Piriformospora indica/Arabidopsis thaliana interaction,” in Sebacinales - Forms, Functions and Biotechnological Applications, Soil Biology Series No. 33, edsVarmaA.KostG.OelmullerR. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 325–343.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 60

  JohriA. K.OelmüllerR.DuaM.YadavV.KumarM.TutejaN.et al (2015). Fungal association and utilization of phosphate by plants: success, limitations, and future prospects.Front. Microbiol.6:984. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00984

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 61

  KarandashovV.NagyR.WegmullerS.AmrheinN.BucherM. (2004). Evolutionary conservation of a phosphate transporter in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1016285–6290. 10.1073/pnas.0306074101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 62

  KeurentjesJ. J. B.AngenentG. C.DickeM.van der PuttenW. H.de RuiterP. C.StruikP. C.et al (2011). Redefining plant systems biology: from cell to ecosystem.Trend Plant Sci.16183–190. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.12.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 63

  KhatabiB. (2009). Molecular Studies on Compatibility in the Mutualistic Plant Root-Piriformospora indica Interaction. M.Sc. Dissertation, Naturwissenschaftlichen Fachbereiche, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 64

  KhatabiB.MolitorA.LindermayrC.PfiffiS.DurnerJ.WettsteinD. V.et al (2012). Ethylene supports colonization of plant roots by the mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica.PLoS ONE7:e35502.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 65

  KloppholzS.KuhnH.RequenaN. (2011). A secreted fungal effector of Glomus intraradices promotes symbiotic biotrophy.Curr. Biol.211204–1209. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 66

  KnechtK.SeyffarthM.DeselC.ThurauT.SherametiI.LouB.et al (2010). Expression of BvGLP-1 encoding a germin-like protein from sugar beet in Arabidopsis thaliana leads to resistance against phytopathogenic fungi.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.23446–457. 10.1094/MPMI-23-4-0446

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 67

  KumarM.YadavV.SinghA.TutejaN.JohriA. K. (2011). Piriformospora indica enhances plant growth by transferring phosphate.Plant Signal. Behav.6723–725. 10.4161/psb.6.5.15106

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 68

  KumarM.YadavV.TutejaN.JohriA. K. (2009). Antioxidant enzyme activities in maize plants colonized with Piriformospora indica.Microbiology155780–790. 10.1099/mic.0.019869-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 69

  KumarP.ChaturvediR.SundarD.BisariaV. S. (2015). Piriformospora indica enhances the production of pentacyclic triterpenoids in Lantana camara L. suspension cultures.Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.1–7. 10.1007/s11240-015-0924-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 70

  KumarV.SahaiV.BisariaV. S. (2013). “Effect of Piriformospora indica on enhanced biosynthesis of anticancer drug, podophyllotoxin in plant cell cultures of Linum album,” in Sebacinales - Forms, Functions and Biotechnological Applications, Soil Biology Series No. 33, edsVarmaA.KostG.OelmullerR. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 119–137.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 71

  LamE. (2004). Controlled cell death, plant survival and development.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.5305–315. 10.1038/nrm1358

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 72

  LambC.DixonR. A. (1997). The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.48251–275. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.251

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 73

  LeeY. C.JohnsonJ. M.ChienC. T.SunC.CaiD. G.LouB. G.et al (2011). Growth promotion of Chinese cabbage and Arabidopsis by Piriformospora indica is not stimulated by mycelium-synthesized auxin.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.24421–431. 10.1094/MPMI-05-10-0110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 74

  LumM. R.HirschA. M. (2003). Roots and their symbiotic microbes: strategies to obtain nitrogen and phosphorous in a nutrient-limiting environment.J. Plant Growth Regul.21368–382. 10.1007/s00344-003-0003-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 75

  MailletF.PoinsotV.AndréO.Puech-PagesV.HaouyA.GueunierM.et al (2011). Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza.Nature46958–63. 10.1038/nature09622

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 76

  Maldonado-MendozaI. E.DewbreG. R.HarrisonM. J. (2001). A phosphate transporter gene from the extra-radical mycelium of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices is regulated in response to phosphate in the environment.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.141140–1148. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.10.1140

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 77

  MallaR.PokhareS. (2008). Antifungal factor produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens against an endophytic fungus.Nepal J. Sci. Tech.965–71.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 78

  MatsushimaR.FukaoY.NishimuraM.Hara-NishimuraI. (2004). NAI1 gene that encodes a basic-helix-loop-helix-type putative transcription factor that regulates the formation of a novel ER-derived structure, the ER body.Plant Cell161536–1549. 10.1105/tpc.021154

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 79

  McAinshM. R.PittmanJ. K. (2009). Shaping the calcium signature.New Phytol.181275–294. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02682.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 80

  MenezesR. C.KaiM.KrauseK.MatthäusC.SvatošA.PoppJ.et al (2015). Monitoring metabolites from Schizophyllum commune interacting with Hypholoma fascicula recombining LESA-HR mass spectrometry and Raman microscopy.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.4072273–2282. 10.1007/s00216-014-8383-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 81

  MolitorA.ZajicD.VollL.Pons-KuehnemannJ.SamansB.KogelK. H.et al (2011). Barley leaf transcriptome and metabolite analysis reveals new aspects of compatibility and Piriformospora indica-mediated systemic induced resistance to powdery mildew.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.241427–1439. 10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0177

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 82

  MurphyB. R.DoohanF. M.HodkinsonT. R. (2014). Yield increase induced by the fungal root endophyte Piriformospora indica in barley grown at low temperature is nutrient limited.Symbiosis6229–39. 10.1007/s13199-014-0268-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 83

  NautiyalC. S.ChauhanP. S.DasGuptaS. M.SeemK.VarmaA.StaddonW. J. (2010). Tripartite interactions among Paenibacillus lentimorbus NRRL B-30488, Piriformospora indica DSM 11827, and Cicer arietinum L.World J. Microbiol. Biot.261393–1399. 10.1007/s11274-010-0312-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 84

  NekrasovV.LiJ.BatouxM.RouxM.ChuZ. H.LacombeS.et al (2009). Control of the pattern recognition receptor EFR by an ER protein complex in plant immunity.EMBO J.283428–3438. 10.1038/emboj.2009.262

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 85

  NgweneB.Andrade-LinaresD. R.FrankenP. (2013). “Phosphate solubilization and plant growth promotion of the fungal root endophyte Piriformospora indica,” in Endophytes for Plant Protection: The State of The Art, edsSchneiderC.LeifertC.FeldmannF. (Braunschweig: Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft), 192–193.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 86

  NitzI.BerkefeldH.PuzioP. S.GrundlerF. M. W. (2001). Pyk10, a seedling and root specific gene and promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Sci.161337–346. 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00412-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 87

  OelmüllerR.ShahollariB.Peškan-BerghöferT.TrebickaA.GiongP. H.SherametiI.et al (2004). Molecular analyses of the interaction between Arabidopsis roots and the growth-promoting fungus Piriformospora indica.Endocytobiosis Cell Res.15504–517.

  • Google Scholar

• 88

  OelmüllerR.SherametiI.TripathiS.VarmaA. (2009). Piriformospora indica, a cultivable root endophyte with multiple biotechnological applications.Symbiosis491–17. 10.1007/s13199-009-0009-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  PandeyR.PaidiS. K.KangJ. W.SpegazziniN.DasariR. R.ValdezT. A.et al (2015). Discerning the differential molecular pathology of proliferative middle ear lesions using Raman spectroscopy.Nat. Sci. Rep.5:13305. 10.1038/srep13305

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  PedersenB. P.KumarH.WaightA. B.RisenmayA. J.Roe-ZurzZ.ChauB. H.et al (2013). Crystal structure of a eukaryotic phosphate transporter.Nature496533–536. 10.1038/nature12042

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  Peškan-BerghöferT.ShahollariB.GiangP. H.HehlS.MarkertC.BlankeV.et al (2004). Association of Piriformospora indica with Arabidopsis thaliana roots represents a novel system to study beneficial plant–microbe interactions and involves early plant protein modifications in the endoplasmatic reticulum and at the plasma membrane.Physiol. Plant122465–477. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00424.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  PhamG. H.KumariR.SinghA.SachdevM.PrasadR.KaldorfM.et al (2004). “Axenic cultures of Piriformospora indica,” in Plant Surface Microbiology, edsVarmaA.AbbottK.WernerD.HamppR. (Berlin: Springer), 593–616.

  • Google Scholar

• 93

  PlettJ. M.DaguerreY.WittulskyS.VayssièresA.DeveauA.MeltonS. J.et al (2014). Effector MiSSP7 of the mutualistic fungus Laccaria bicolor stabilizes the populus JAZ6 protein and represses jasmonic acid (JA) responsive genes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1118299–8304. 10.1073/pnas.1322671111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  PlettJ. M.KemppainenM.KaleS. D.KohlerA.LeguéV.BrunA.et al (2011). A secreted effector protein of Laccaria bicolor is required for symbiosis development.Curr. Biol.211197–1203. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  Porras-AlfaroA.BaymanP. (2011). Hidden fungi, emergent properties: endophytes and microbiomes.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.49291–315. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081831

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  PrasadR. (2008). Studies on Interaction Between Symbiotic Fungus (Piriformospora indica), Rhizobacteria and Selected Plants.Ph.D. thesis, Merrut University, Meerut.

  • Google Scholar

• 97

  PrasadR.KamalS.SharmaP. K.OelmuellerR.VarmaA. (2013). Root endophyte Piriformospora indica DSM 11827 alters plants morphology, enhances biomass and antioxidant activity of medicinal plant Bacopa monniera.J. Basic Microbiol.531016–1024. 10.1002/jobm.201200367

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  PrasadR.KumarM.VarmaA. (2015a). “Role of PGPR in soil fertility and plant health,” in Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Medicinal Plants, edsEgamberdievaD.ShrivastavaS.VarmaA. (Cham: Springer), 247–260.

  • Google Scholar

• 99

  PrasadR.PandeyR.BarmanI. (2015b). Engineering tailored nanoparticles with microbes: quo vadis?Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.8316–330. 10.1002/wnan.1363

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  PrasadR.SharmaM.KamalS.RaiM. K.RawatA. K. S.PushpangdanP.et al (2008). “Interaction of Piriformospora indica with medicinal plants,” in Mycorrhiza, ed.VarmaA. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 655–678.

  • Google Scholar

• 101

  QiangX.WeissM.KogelK. H.SchäferP. (2011). Piriformospora indica - a mutualistic basidiomycete with an exceptionally large plant host range.Mol. Plant Pathol.13508–518. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00764.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  QiangX.ZechmannB.ReitzM. U.KogelK. H.SchaferP. (2012). The mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica colonizes Arabidopsis roots by inducing an endoplasmic reticulum stress-triggered caspase-dependent cell death.Plant Cell24794–809. 10.1105/tpc.111.093260

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  RabieyM.UllahI.ShawM. W. (2015). The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica protects wheat from fusarium crown rot disease in simulated UK autumn conditions.Plant Pathol.641029–1040. 10.1111/ppa.12335

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  RaiM.AcharyaD.SinghA.VarmaA. (2001). Positive growth responses of the medicinal plants Spilanthes calva and Withania somnifera to inoculation by Piriformospora indica in a field trial.Mycorrhiza11123–128. 10.1007/s005720100115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  RaiM. K.VarmaA.PandeyA. K. (2004). Antifungal potential of Spilanthes calva after inoculation of Piriformospora indica.Mycoses47479–481. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.01045.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  RaskL.AndreassonE.EkbomB.ErikssonS.PontoppidanB.MeijerJ. (2000). Myrosinase: gene family evolution and herbivore defense in Brassicaceae.Plant Mol. Biol.4293–113. 10.1023/A:1006380021658

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  RauschC.BucherM. (2002). Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport in plants.Planta21623–37. 10.1007/s00425-002-0921-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  RodriguezR. J.RedmanR. S.HensonJ. M. (2004). The role of fungal symbioses in the adaptation of plants to high stress environments.Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Glob. Change9261–272.

  • Google Scholar

• 109

  RodriguezR. J.WhiteJ. F.Jr.ArnoldA. E.RedmanR. S. (2009). Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles.New Phytol.182314–330. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  RoestiD.GaurR.JohriB. N.ImfeldG.SharmaS. (2006). Plant growth stage, fertilizer management and bio-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria affect the rhizobacterial community structure in rain-fed wheat fields.Soil Biol. Biochem.381111–1120. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  SaijoY.TintorN.LuX.RaufP.Pajerowska-MukhtarK.HäwekerH.et al (2009). Receptor quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum for plant innate immunity.EMBO J.283439–3449. 10.1038/emboj.2009.263

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  SandersD.PellouxJ.BrownleeC.HarperJ. F. (2002). Calcium at the crossroads of signaling.Plant Cell14(Suppl.), 401–417.

  • Google Scholar

• 113

  SarmaM. V. R. K.KumarV.SaharanK.SrivastavaR.SharmaA. K.PrakashA.et al (2011). Application of inorganic carrier-based formulations of fluorescent pseudomonads and Piriformospora indica on tomato plants and evaluation of their efficacy.J. Appl. Microbiol.111456–466. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05062.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  SatheesanJ.NarayananA. K.SakunthalaM. (2012). Induction of root colonization by Piriformospora indica leads to enhanced asiaticoside production in Centella asiatica.Mycorrhiza22195–202. 10.1007/s00572-011-0394-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  SchäferP.KhatabiB.KogelK. H. (2007). Root cell death and systemic effects of Piriformospora indica: a study on mutualism.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.2751–7. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00848.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  SchäferP.KogelK. H. (2009). “The Sebacinoid fungus Piriformospora indica, an orchid mycorrhiza which may increase host plant reproduction and fitness,” in Plant Relationships, ed.DeisingH. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 99–112.

  • Google Scholar

• 117

  SchäferP.PfiffiS.VollL. M.ZajicD.ChandlerP. M.WallerF.et al (2009). Manipulation of plant innate immunity and gibberellin as factor of compatibility in the mutualistic association of barley roots with Piriformospora indica.Plant J.59461–474. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03887.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  SchuckS.CamehlI.GilardoniP. A.OelmüllerR.BaldwinI. T.BonaventureG. (2012). HSPRO controls early Nicotiana attenuata seedling growth during interaction with the fungus Piriformospora indica.Plant Physiol.160929–943. 10.1104/pp.112.203976

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  SerflingA.WirselS. G.LindV.DeisingH. B. (2007). Performance of the biocontrol fungus Piriformospora indica on wheat under greenhouse and field conditions.Phytopathology97523–531. 10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0523

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  ShahabivandS.MaivanH. Z.GoltapehE. M.SharifiM.AlilooA. A. (2012). The effects of root endophyte and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and cadmium accumulation in wheat under cadmium toxicity.Plant Physiol. Biochem.6053–58. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.07.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  ShahollariB.VadasseryJ.VarmaA.OelmüllerR. (2007). A leucine-rich repeat protein is required for growth promotion and enhanced seed production mediated by the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.501–13. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03028.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  ShahollariB.VarmaA.OelmullerR. (2005). Expression of a receptor kinase in Arabidopsis roots is stimulated by the basidiomycete Piriformospora indica and the protein accumulates in Triton X- 100 insoluble plasma membrane microdomains.J. Plant Physiol.162945–958. 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.08.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  SharafzadehS. (2012). Effects of ethylene on growth and active substances of medicinal plants.Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci.3465–469.

  • Google Scholar

• 124

  SharmaG.AgarwalV. (2013). Marked enhancement in the artemisinin content and biomass productivity in Artemisia annua L. shoots co-cultivated with Piriformospora indica.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.291133–1138. 10.1007/s11274-013-1263-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  SharmaM.SchmidM.RothballerM.HauseG.ZuccaroA.ImaniJ.et al (2008). Detection and identification of bacteria intimately associated with fungi of the order Sebacinales.Cell Microbiol.102235–2246. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01202.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  SharmaP.KharkwalA. C.AbdinM. Z.VarmaA. (2014). Piriformospora indica improves micropropagation, growth and phytochemical content of Aloe vera L. plants.Symbiosis6411–23. 10.1007/s13199-014-0298-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  ShenH.YeW.HongL.HuangH.WangZ.DengX.et al (2006). Progress in parasitic plant biology: host selection and nutrient transfer.Plant Biol.8175–185. 10.1055/s-2006-923796

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  SherametiI.ShahollariB.VenusY.AltschmiedL.VarmaA.OelmullerR. (2005). The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica stimulates the expression of nitrate reductase and the starch-degrading enzyme glucan-water dikinase in tobacco and Arabidopsis roots through a homeodomain transcription factor that binds to a conserved motif in their promoters.J. Biol. Chem.28026241–26247.

  • Google Scholar

• 129

  SherametiI.TripathiS.VarmaA.OelmullerR. (2008). The rootcolonizing endophyte Pirifomospora indica confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by stimulating the expression of drought stress related genes in leaves.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.21799–807. 10.1094/MPMI-21-6-0799

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  ShoreshM.MastouriF.HarmanG. E. (2010). Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.4821–43. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114450

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  SinghA.SharmaJ.RexerK. H.VarmaA. (2000). Plant productivity determinants beyond minerals, water and light. Piriformospora indica: a revolutionary plant growth promoting fungus.Curr. Sci.79101–106.

  • Google Scholar

• 132

  SinghA.SinghA.KumariM.RaiM. K.VarmaA. (2003). Biotechnological importance of Priformospora indicia - a novel symbiotic mycorrhiza-like fungus: an overview.Indian J. Biotechnol.265–75.

  • Google Scholar

• 133

  SinghL. P.GillS. S.TutejaN. (2011). Unraveling the role of fungal symbionts in plant abiotic stress tolerance.Plant Signal. Behav.6175–191. 10.4161/psb.6.2.14146

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  SirrenbergA.GöbelC.GrondS.CzempinskiN.RatzingerA.KarlovskyP.et al (2007). Piriformospora indica affects plant growth by auxin production.Physiol. Plant.131581–589. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00983.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  SteinE.MolitorA.KogelK. H.WallerF. (2008). Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis conferred by the mycorrhizal fungus Piriformospora indica requires jasmonic acid signaling and the cytoplasmic function of NPR1.Plant Cell Physiol.491747–1751. 10.1093/pcp/pcn147

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  StotzH. U.KroymannJ.Mitchell-OldsT. (1999). Plant-insect interactions.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.2268–272. 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)80048-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  StotzH. U.PittendrighB. R.KroymannJ.WenigerK.FritscheJ.BaukeA.et al (2000). Induced plant defense responses against chewing insects. Ethylene signaling reduces resistance of Arabidopsis against cotton worm but not diamondback moth.Plant Physiol.1241007–1017. 10.1104/pp.124.3.1007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  SumanP. R.JainV. K.VarmaA. (2010). Role of nanomaterials in symbiotic fungus growth enhancement.Curr. Sci.991189–1191.

  • Google Scholar

• 139

  SunC.JohnsonJ. M.CaiD.SherametiI.OelmullerR.LouB. (2010). Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance in Chinese cabbage leaves by stimulating antioxidant enzymes, the expression of drought-related genes and the plastid localized CAS protein.J. Plant Physiol.1671009–1017. 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.02.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  SunC.ShaoY.VahabiK.LuJ.BhattacharyaS.DongS.et al (2014). The beneficial fungus Piriformospora indica protects Arabidopsis from Verticillium dahliae infection by downregulation plant defense responses.BMC Plant Biol.14:268. 10.1186/s12870-014-0268-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  ThrallP. H.HochbergM. E.BurdonJ. J.BeverJ. D. (2007). Coevolution of symbiotic mutualists and parasites in a community context.Trend Ecol. Evol.22120–126. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  TierensK. F.ThommaB. P.BrouwerM.SchmidtJ.KistnerK.PorzelA.et al (2001). Study of the role of antimicrobial glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates in resistance of Arabidopsis to microbial pathogens.Plant Physiol.1251688–1699. 10.1104/pp.125.4.1688

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  TrivediD. K.BhattH.PalR.JohriA. K.TutejaN.BhaveshN. S. (2013). Sequence specific 1H,13C and 15N NMR assignments of cyclophilin A like protein from P. indica involved in salt tolerance.Biomol. NMR Assign.7175–178. 10.1007/s12104-012-9404-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  TsonevT.LidonF. J. C. (2012). Zinc in plants - an overview.Emir. J. Food Agric.24322.

  • Google Scholar

• 145

  TuladharR.ShresthaJ.SinghA.VarmaA. (2013). “Enhanced productivity associated with tripartite symbiosis between phaseolus, rhizobia, and Piriformospora indica: in presence of vermicompost,” in Sebacinales - Forms, Functions and Biotechnological Applications, Soil Biology Series No. 33, edsVarmaA.KostG.OelmullerR. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 191–199.

  • Google Scholar

• 146

  UnnikumarK. R.SowjanyaS. K.VarmaA. (2013). Piriformospora indica: a versatile root endophytic symbiont.Symbiosis60107–113. 10.1007/s13199-013-0246-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  UpadhyayaC. P.GururaniM. A.PrasadR.VarmaA. (2013). A cell wall extract from Piriformospora indica promotes tuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) via enhanced expression of Ca+2 signaling pathway and lipoxygenase gene.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.170743–755. 10.1007/s12010-013-0231-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  VadasseryJ.OelmüllerR. (2009). Calcium signaling in pathogenic and beneficial plant microbe interactions: what can we learn from the interaction between Piriformospora indica and Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Signal. Behav.41024–1027. 10.4161/psb.4.11.9800

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  VadasseryJ.RanfS.DrzewieckiC.MithöferA.MazarsC.ScheelD.et al (2009). A cell wall extract from the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica promotes growth of Arabidopsis seedlings and induces intracellular calcium elevation in roots.Plant J.59193–206. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03867.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  VadasseryJ.RitterC.VenusY.CamehlI.VarmaA.ShahollariB.et al (2008). The role of auxins and cytokinins in the mutualistic interaction between Arabidopsis and Piriformospora indica.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.211371–1383. 10.1094/MPMI-21-10-1371

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  VahabiK.SherametiI.BakshiM.MrozinskaA.LudwigA.OelmüllerR. (2015). Microarray analyses during early and later stages of the Arabidopsis/Piriformospora indica interaction.Genom. Data616–18. 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.07.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  Van WeesS. C. M.Van der EntS.PieterseC. M. J. (2008). Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.11443–448. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  VarmaA.BajajR.AgarwalA.AsthanaS.RajpalK.DasA.et al (2013). Memoirs of ‘Rootonic’-the Magic Fungus.Noida: Amity University Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 154

  VarmaA.BakshiM.LouB.AntonH.OelmüllerR. (2012b). Piriformospora indica: a novel plant growth-promoting mycorrhizal fungus.Agric. Res.1117–131. 10.1007/s40003-012-0019-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  VarmaA.RaiM. K.SahayN. S. (2000). “Microbial biotechnology: new paradigms and role in sustainable agriculture,” in Microbialbiotechnology for Sustainable Development and Productivity, ed.RajakR. C. (Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers), 22–37.

  • Google Scholar

• 156

  VarmaA.SherametiI.TripathiS.PrasadR.DasA.et al (2012a). “The symbiotic fungus Piriformospora indica: review,” in Fungal Association The Mycota IX, ed.HockB. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 231–254.

  • Google Scholar

• 157

  VarmaA.SinghA.SudhaM.SahayN. S.SharmaJ.RoyA.et al (2001). “Piriformospora indica: a cultivable mycorrhiza-like endosymbiotic fungus,” in The Mycota IX, ed.HockB. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 125–150.

  • Google Scholar

• 158

  VarmaA.SreeK. S.AroraM.BajajR.PrasadR.KharkwalA. C. (2014). Functions of novel symbiotic fungus - Piriformospora indica.Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad.80429–441. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084920

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  VarmaA.VermaS.SudahS. N.FrankenP. (1999). Piriformospora indica, a cultivable plant growth-promoting root endophyte.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.652741–2744.

  • Google Scholar

• 160

  WallerF.AchatzB.BaltruschatH.FodorJ.BeckerK.FischerM.et al (2005). The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10213386–13391. 10.1073/pnas.0504423102

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  WallerF.MukherjeeK.DeshmukhS. D.AchatzB.SharmaM.SchäferP.et al (2008). Systemic and local modulation of plant responses by Piriformospora indica and related Sebacinales species.J. Plant Physiol.16560–70. 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  WangD.WeaverN. D.KesarwaniM.DongX. (2005). Induction of protein secretory pathway is required for systemic acquired resistance.Science3081036–1040. 10.1126/science.1108791

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  WeissM.SelosseM. A.RexerK. H.UrbanA.OberwinklerF. (2004). Sebacinales: a hitherto overlooked cosm of heterobasidiomycetes with a broad mycorrhizal potential.Mycol. Res.1081003–1010. 10.1017/S0953756204000772

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  WhiteJ. F.TorresM. S. (2010). Is plant endophyte-mediated defensive mutualism the result of oxidative stress protection?Physiol. Plant.138440–446. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01332.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  WittstockU.HalkierB. A. (2002). Glucosinolate research in the Arabidopsis era.Trend Plant Sci.7263–270. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02273-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  XuG.FanX.MillerA. J. (2012). Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.63153–182. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  YadavV.KumarM.DeepD. K.KumarH.SharmaR.TripathiT.et al (2010). A phosphate transporter from the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica plays a role in phosphate transport to the host plant.J. Biol. Chem.28526532–26544. 10.1074/jbc.M110.111021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  ZareaM. J.ChordiaP.VarmaA. (2013). Piriformospora indica versus salt stress.Soil Biol.33263–281. 10.1007/978-3-642-33802-1_16

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  ZareaM. J.HajiniaS.KarimiN.GoltapehE. M.RejaliF.VarmaA. (2012). Effect of Piriformospora indica and Azospirillum strains from saline or non-saline soil on mitigation of the effects of NaCl.Soil Biol. Biochem.45139–146. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  ZhangW. Y.WangA. A.HaoR. C.YangT. (2014). Eendophytic fungus Piriformospora indica promotes growth and confers drought tolerance in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.).Chinese J. Oil Crop Sci.1:11.

  • Google Scholar

• 171

  ZipfelC.KunzeG.ChinchillaD.CaniardA.JonesJ. D.BollerT.et al (2006). Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.Cell125749–760. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  ZuccaroA.BasiewiczM.ZurawskaM.BiedenkopfD.KogelK. H. (2009). Karyotype analysis, genome organization, and stable genetic transformation of the root colonizing fungus Piriformospora indica.Fungal Genet. Biol.46543–550. 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.03.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  ZuccaroA.LahrmannU.GüldenerU.LangenG.PfiffiS.BiedenkopfD.et al (2011). Endophytic life strategies decoded by genome and transcriptome analyses of the mutualistic root symbiont Piriformospora indica.PLoS Pathogens7:e1002290. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002290

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar