Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Med. Technol., 24 May 2023
Sec. Medtech Data Analytics
This article is part of the Research Topic Data-driven technologies for future healthcare systems View all 7 articles

Editorial: Data-driven technologies for future healthcare systems

  • 1School of Computing, Mathematics and Engineering, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia
  • 2Department of Business Technology and Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
  • 3SDU Health Informatics and Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Editorial on the Research Topic
Data-driven technologies for future healthcare systems

The use of data in modern healthcare systems is increasing rapidly with the increased availability and volume of digital health data and the advancement of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) such as machine learning and deep learning techniques. Research involving health data has received a great deal of attention in recent years from the research community. Development and deployment of novel and existing AI techniques can have huge benefits for the healthcare systems including early detection, monitoring, prevention, prediction, diagnosis, treatment, and administration of diseases of patients (1). AI techniques will play an important role in the development of future data-driven tools to help both healthcare professionals and patients take more informed decisions to improve health outcome.

The main goal of this Research Topic was to explore novel and existing data-driven techniques in healthcare relevant for development of innovative data-driven solutions, i.e., to be used for:

intelligent monitoring and decision support systems such as the PATINA decision support tool that based on monitoring of existing municipality care data can help prevent hospitalization of frail older adults living in their own homes (2).

predictive models for prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis such as the prognostic tool that based on infrared thermography and deep learning techniques can help identify high-risk patients during triage at the Emergency Department (3).

digital health systems offering novel personalized data collection, treatment plans and interventions such as the eMindYourHeart web-based intervention for depression and anxiety in patients with ischemic heart disease attending cardiac rehabilitation (4).

The common thread in the above three examples is that data-driven technologies should be used to support humans in their current work (i.e., decision support systems) rather than replace humans (i.e., decision making systems). This also implies that the AI-based decision support systems should provide their recommendations in a form that is interpretable and understandable by humans (i.e., explainable AI). Failing to do so limits the usability of and trust in such systems (i.e., black box systems). These aspects are particular important to address in work settings such as healthcare where decisions have impact on human lives. While the opportunities of using AI for health are many, currently the examples of successful use in clinical practice are still limited due to various challenges as documented in detail in two recent review papers (5, 6).

Papers within this Research Topic focus on challenges, limitations, opportunities, and potential impact for future healthcare systems from practical, experimental, or theoretical perspectives. Papers emphasize how the stakeholders (i.e., patients and their relatives, healthcare professionals, hospital administrators, etc.) benefit from the proposed data-driven solutions.

We received 13 submissions from a variety of countries including United States, China, Republic of Korea, Pakistan, Australia, Kazakhstan, Iran, and Czechia. Six quality papers were accepted. We provide a brief introduction to each accepted paper below.

Levy et al. used 12 machine learning algorithms to predict hospital acquired pressure injuries (HAPI). The data for the paper was based on a retrospective study. The results show that a logistic regression algorithm performs better than the other used classification algorithms to predict HAPI.

Lyu et al. presented a model to predict patient choice in medical decision-making. Three classifications algorithms were used in their study. The research aims to promote the development and application of a patient-centric medical decision-making system to obtain better patient outcome.

Li et al. developed an artificial intelligence tool for diagnosis and treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. It is shown that the performance of the tool surpassed that of human experts, and that the model also significantly improved the experts' diagnostic accuracy.

Kim et al. used machine learning models to automate the classification of sleep stages and estimation of sleep efficiency based on heart rate variability derived features and acceleration features processed from actigraphy data.

Huang et al. developed and validated predictive machine learning models for risk stratification for 28-day in-hospital mortality of elderly patients with ischemic stroke who were admitted to the intensive care unit.

Liu et al. used natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to develop an intelligent medical guidance and recommendation model based on online patient-physician communication data.

In summary, the six accepted papers demonstrate how data-driven technologies can be used to assist healthcare professionals and patients to better manage their disease by providing novel decision support. Showing the potential is only the first step in successful clinical use of AI-based techniques. However, we sincerely hope to see an increased focus in future work to bring the promising solutions into real clinical practice to fully unlock the potential to improve health outcomes in the future.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

The topic editors would like to express their thanks to all contributing authors and reviewers who made this Research Topic possible.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Rahman MA, Honan B, Glanville T, Hough P, Walker K. Using data mining to predict emergency department length of stay greater than 4 h: derivation and single-site validation of a decision tree algorithm. Emerg Med Australas. (2019) 32(3):416–21. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fournaise A, Lauridsen JT, Nissen SK, Gudex C, Bech M, Mejldal A, et al. Structured decision support to prevent hospitalisations of community-dwelling older adults in Denmark (PATINA): an open-label, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Healthy Longev. (2023) 4(4):e132–42. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00023-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Baskaran R, Møller K, Wiil UK, Brabrand M. Using facial landmark detection on thermal images as a novel prognostic tool for emergency departments. Front Artif Intell. (2022) 5:815333. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.815333

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pedersen SS, Andersen CM, Ahm R, Skovbakke SJ, Kok R, Helmark C, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a therapist-assisted web-based intervention for depression and anxiety in patients with ischemic heart disease attending cardiac rehabilitation [eMindYourHeart trial]: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2021) 21:20. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01801-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Yin J, Ngiam KY, Teo HH. Role of artificial intelligence applications in real-life clinical practice: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23(4):e25759. doi: 10.2196/25759

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. (2019) 17:195. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: data mining, data analytics, machine learning, healthcare systems, health outcome

Citation: Rahman MA, Moayedikia A and Wiil UK (2023) Editorial: Data-driven technologies for future healthcare systems. Front. Med. Technol. 5:1183687. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1183687

Received: 10 March 2023; Accepted: 15 May 2023;
Published: 24 May 2023.

Edited by:

Saugat Bhattacharyya, Ulster University, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Alessia Sarica, University of Magna Graecia, Italy
Ameer Tamoor Khan, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China

© 2023 Rahman, Moayedikia and Wiil. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Md Anisur Rahman arahman@csu.edu.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.