The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Regulatory Science
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1473862
This article is part of the Research Topic Repurposing for Small Population Needs View all 8 articles
Effects of the Paediatric Regulation funding on the development of offpatent medicines in children
Provisionally accepted- 1 Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi onlus, Valenzano, Italy
- 2 TEDDY Network of Excellence for Paediatric Research, Pavia, Italy
In paediatrics, medicines repurposing is a particularly advantageous approach, offering a route to address unmet medical needs and turn off-label use into evidence-based treatments for paediatric populations.This study analysed the effects of funds provided under the Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7-FRP), issued by the European Commission from 2007 to 2013 according to the European Paediatric Regulation, in terms of new paediatric marketing authorisations (MAs) including Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisations (PUMAs). Additionally, we investigated which funded projects included repurposing initiatives. Data was collected on Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs), new MAs, and MAs variations from the EMA website, national medicine registers, and final project reports. A survey to project coordinators was also conducted to explore the challenges faced during paediatric drug development plans.The 20 FP7-funded projects studied 24 off-patent active substances. Eighteen substances had agreed PIPs with the European Medicines Agency Paediatric Committee (PDCO). Positive compliance checks were granted for 3 PIPs, resulting in 3 new PUMAs. According to the adopted definition, 22 out of 24 (91.6%) paediatric development plans could be classified as repurposing. New conditions were proposed for 8 substances, while 16 aimed to extend existing indications to broader paediatric populations. Additionally, 18 development plans included new age-appropriate formulations. The survey revealed that primary challenges in paediatric development plans included budgeting, lengthy regulatory processes, and recruitment.Taken together, these results highlighted on one hand that the FP7 programme had a positive impact, as 3 new PUMAs were effectively obtained, representing one third of total the 9 PUMAs obtained since the Paediatric Regulation entered into force, and 3 out of 18 agreed PIPs were successfully completed within 3 to 10 years. In addition, repurposing existing drugs for paediatric use significantly contributed to addressing unmet medical needs in paediatrics. On the other hand, the gap between the number of agreed PIPs and those that have led to PUMAs is still considerable, due to regulatory barriers and financial constraints. This underscores the need for continued support and further initiatives to streamline public-private partnerships for paediatric drug development, ensuring that off-patent medicines can be safely and effectively repurposed for paediatric use.
Keywords: Paediatric medicines, Off-patent, Repurposing, Seventh Framework Programme, European Paediatric Regulation; public-private partnership
Received: 31 Jul 2024; Accepted: 16 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Ruggieri, Torretta, Giannuzzi, Natale, Felisi, Ceci and Bonifazi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lucia Ruggieri, Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi onlus, Valenzano, Italy
Silvia Torretta, Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi onlus, Valenzano, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.