This article is a correction to:
Comparison of Indocyanine Green Angiography and Swept-Source Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Posterior Uveitis
Meng Tian1,2,3
Guodong Zeng4
Christoph Tappeiner2,5,6
Martin S. Zinkernagel2Sebastian Wolf2,3
Marion R. Munk2,3*- 1Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- 2Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 3Bern Photographic Reading Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 4SITEM Center for Translational Medicine and Biomedical Entrepreneurship, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 5Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- 6Pallas Klinik, Olten, Switzerland
A corrigendum on
Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and swept-source wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography in posterior uveitis
by Tian, M., Zeng, G., Tappeiner, C., Zinkernagel, M. S., Wolf, S., and Munk, M. R. (2022). Front. Med. 9:853315. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.853315
In the published article, there was an error in affiliation ranking for “Meng Tian.” Instead of the sequence “1Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Bern Photographic Reading Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 3Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,” it should be “1Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 3Bern Photographic Reading Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: OCT angiography (OCTA), indocyanine green (ICG), wide field, uveitis, posterior uveitis, imaging, choriocapillaris (CC), choroid
Citation: Tian M, Zeng G, Tappeiner C, Zinkernagel MS, Wolf S and Munk MR (2024) Corrigendum: Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and swept-source wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography in posterior uveitis. Front. Med. 11:1426456. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1426456
Received: 01 May 2024; Accepted: 02 May 2024;
Published: 14 May 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Tian, Zeng, Tappeiner, Zinkernagel, Wolf and Munk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marion R. Munk, bWFyaW9uX211bmsmI3gwMDA0MDtob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ==