Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Med., 25 October 2024
Sec. Geriatric Medicine
This article is part of the Research Topic Building Resilience in an Era of Multiple Global Crises View all 11 articles

Best medical practices for older adults after a disaster: a narrative review

\r\nAiko IshikiAiko IshikiEmiko KurosawaEmiko KurosawaDaiki NaraiDaiki NaraiYuta SakaiYuta SakaiYoutaro ArimaYoutaro ArimaAkinobu AiharaAkinobu AiharaToshihiro YamagataToshihiro YamagataYoshihisa KatsutaYoshihisa KatsutaShigeto MashikoShigeto MashikoTomoya OizumiTomoya OizumiKatsutoshi Furukawa
Katsutoshi Furukawa*
  • Division of Geriatric and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan

Introduction

Traditionally, New Year's Day is a joyous occasion for family gatherings in Japan. Many young workers and students usually return to their rural homes from urban districts where they work or study during the New Year break. On Monday, 1 January 2024, at ~04:10 pm, an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.6, followed by a tsunami, struck the Noto Peninsula in Japan (1). More than 200 casualties have been reported to date. While the percentage of individuals over the age of 65 is 9.3% globally and 28.6% in Japan, Ishikawa Prefecture, where the Noto Peninsula is located, has an even higher aging rate of 30.1%, with Suzu City reaching 51.4%.

Among the evacuees at the Ishikawa Sports Center in Kanazawa, 80% were elderly and 60% required nursing care. This marks the second time that Japan's super-aged society has been impacted by a major earthquake and tsunami, the first being the Great East Japan Earthquake on 11 March 2011 (2). This narrative review explores the impact of this earthquake, as well as the preparedness and response efforts in relation to older people.

Disaster responses

Acute responses

Immediately after the earthquake and tsunami occurred, several disaster-relief teams, such as the Disaster Medical Assistance Team (DMAT), responded to the Noto Peninsula to rescue victims and provide emergency medical care. It is critical that the lives saved during the disaster are not lost later due to environmental challenges, as disaster-related secondary deaths should be prevented. Older people accounted for the majority of disaster-related deaths (3).

Health problems of the elderly

Older people often suffer from chronic illnesses that require regular medication (4). Their weakened immune systems also put them at high risk of infection. Additionally, during disasters, they are vulnerable to conditions such as stroke, heart failure, thrombosis, or infectious diseases due to limited access to clean water, nutritious food, and shelter. Poor hygiene and cold conditions in evacuation facilities further exacerbate these risks (5). Research confirms that older people are at a significantly higher risk of developing pneumonia in such situations (6).

Prevention of health problems

To prevent the worsening of chronic diseases, hypothermia, infectious diseases, and other health issues, it is necessary to ensure that older individuals receive the following: appropriate medication, hydration, nutritious food, the opportunity to exercise, oral care, proper hygiene, and warm shelter (7). In some facilities, patients with respiratory infections, such as influenza and COVID-19, and gastrointestinal infections, such as norovirus, have also been reported (8). Additionally, preventive measures are needed for people sheltering outside of evacuation centers, such as those staying crumbling homes or cars. Overcrowding in shelters makes it difficult to practice preventive measures such as hand washing and gargling (9). As physical strength and immunity decline due to cold sleeping conditions, it is essential to move residents to secondary evacuation facilities, such as hotels, public housing, or rented accommodations, as early as possible (10).

Relocation stress

Many people may be reluctant to move to secondary evacuation sites due to the emotional stress of leaving behind their homes and belongings. This reluctance can lead to decreased physical strength, motivation, cognitive function, and the inability to perform daily activities, contributing to “relocation stress.” This stress is often marked by increased falls, higher susceptibility to pneumonia and infections, and mental health issues that can result in disaster-related deaths. It is crucial to provide adequate support and collaborate with residents to develop favorable plans for relocation (11).

Impact on older adults

Quantitatively, older adults are significantly more at risk of mortality in the aftermath of disasters. For example, during Hurricane Katrina, older adults accounted for ~70% of fatalities, despite comprising only a small percentage of the population (12). Similarly, following the 2011 tsunami in Japan, older survivors experienced higher rates of hypothermia and dehydration (2). Qualitatively, older adults are more likely to be displaced from their homes and face challenges in accessing medical care. Research has shown that after the 2010 Haiti earthquake, older adults faced significant barriers to accessing healthcare services, with only a fraction of them receiving necessary follow-up care (13).

Discussion

For older people, changes in their living environment and relationships with those around them can negatively impact both their physical and mental wellbeing, even if they were previously healthy (1416). To prevent relocation stress, responders must be mindful of these risks and encourage family members and community members to interact and engage with older people. Keeping older people active by encouraging them to move, exercise, and resume their daily activities is also beneficial. A consistent, proactive approach is essential, such as ensuring appropriate medical care and encouraging prompt consultation with healthcare professionals if any changes in their physical condition arise (17, 18).

Understanding “relocation stress” represents a significant gap in disaster response efforts, as some responders, including medical staff, may not fully grasp its importance or the risks it poses. We believe that two key areas of research are vital moving forward: (i) conducting thorough and careful health check-ups of older adults, and (ii) investigating which interventions most effectively improve the health of elderly people during disaster recovery. Our conclusions are supported by the Japan Geriatrics Society.

There is a pressing need to focus on the overall wellbeing of disaster-affected individuals, addressing both their physical and mental health while providing long-term support for their recovery and reconstruction efforts.

Author contributions

AI: Writing – original draft. EK: Writing – original draft. DN: Writing – review & editing. YS: Writing – review & editing. YA: Writing – review & editing. AA: Writing – review & editing. TY: Writing – review & editing. YK: Writing – review & editing. SM: Writing – review & editing. TO: Writing – review & editing. KF: Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Saito H, Takita M, Abe T, Yamamoto C, Zhao T. Japan facing a disaster striking the super-aged community. Lancet. (2024) 403:1537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00248-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Furukawa K, Arai H. Earthquake in Japan. Lancet. (2011) 377:1652. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60673-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. George C, Kanakamma LG, John J, Sunny G, Cohen A, De Silva MJ, et al. Post-tsunami mental health: A cross-sectional survey of the predictors of common mental disorders in South India 9-11 months after the 2004 Tsunami. Asia Pac Psychiatry. (2012) 4:104–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5872.2012.00196.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bateman RM, Sharpe MD, Jagger JE, Ellis J, Solé-Violán M, López-Rodríguez E, et al. 36th International symposium on intensive care and emergency medicine: Brussels, Belgium. 15-18 March 2016. Crit Care. (2016) 20:94. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1208-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bhadra S. Issues among elderly survivors and provisions of support in disaster response policies and programme in India. Ind J of Gerontology. (2020) 34:525–43.

Google Scholar

6. Yamanda S, Hanagama M, Kobayashi S, Satou H, Tokuda S, Niu K, et al. The impact of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake on hospitalisation for respiratory disease in a rapidly aging society: a retrospective descriptive and cross-sectional study at the disaster base hospital in Ishinomaki. BMJ Open. (2013) 3:e000865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000865

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cornell V, Cusack L, Arbon P. Older people and disaster preparedness: a literature review. Aust J Emerg Manag. (2012) 27:49–53.

Google Scholar

8. Nascetti S, Busani L, Bartoli F, Orioli R, Stenico A, Regele D. Community waterborne outbreak linked to a firefighting response during the COVID-19 emergency. Ann Ist Super Sanita. (2021) 57:226–32. doi: 10.4415/ANN_21_03_05

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Loke AY, Lai CKY, Fung OWM. At-home disaster preparedness of elderly people in Hong Kong. Geriatr Gerontol Int. (2012) 12:524–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00778.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ngo EB. Elderly people and disaster. In: Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. London: Routledge (2012). p. 447–458.

Google Scholar

11. Marella M, Devine A, Armecin GF, Zayas J, Marco MJ, Vaughan C. Disaster response inclusiveness to persons with disabilities and the elderly in the Philippines. In: Health Disparities, Disasters, and Crises. London: Routledge (2023). p. 94–110.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

12. Caillouet LP, Paul PJ, Sabatier SM, Caillouet KA. Eye of the storm: analysis of shelter treatment records of evacuees to Acadiana from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Am J Disaster Med. (2012) 7:253–71. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2012.0099

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hirose N, Chen S, Shiba K, Patil CL, Rahman MM, Shimpuku Y. Universal health coverage of five essential health services in mothers before and after the Haiti 2010 earthquake: a retrospective cohort study using difference-in-difference. BMC Health Serv Res. (2022) 22:1505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08896-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Hong H, Tsuchiya S, Hasemi Y. Evacuation ability of residents and general capability of disaster response system at care facilities for elderly people. J Korean Soc of Hazard Mitig. (2019) 19:13–24. doi: 10.9798/KOSHAM.2019.19.1.13

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Phranknoi N, Sutanto J. Juliana, Hu Y, Goh YS, Lee CEC. Older people's needs in urban disaster response: a systematic literature review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. (2023) 96:103809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103809

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kunii Y, Usukura H, Utsumi Y, Seto M, Hamaie Y, Sugawara Y, et al. Review of mental health consequences of the Great East Japan earthquake through long-term epidemiological studies: the Shichigahama health promotion project. Tohoku J Exp Med. (2022) 257:85–95. doi: 10.1620/tjem.2022.J039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Smith SM, Tremethick MJ, Johnson P, Gorski J. Disaster planning and response: considering the needs of the frail elderly. Int J Emerg Manag. (2009) 6:1–13. doi: 10.1504/IJEM.2009.025170

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sri-On Sri-On J, Vanichkulbodee A, Sinsuwan N, Rojsaengroeng R, Kamsom A, Liu SW. Disaster preparedness among Thai elderly emergency department patients: a survey of patients' perspective. BMC Emerg Med. (2019) 19:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0269-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: disaster, earthquake, tsunami, evacuation, older people

Citation: Ishiki A, Kurosawa E, Narai D, Sakai Y, Arima Y, Aihara A, Yamagata T, Katsuta Y, Mashiko S, Oizumi T and Furukawa K (2024) Best medical practices for older adults after a disaster: a narrative review. Front. Med. 11:1420495. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1420495

Received: 20 April 2024; Accepted: 16 September 2024;
Published: 25 October 2024.

Edited by:

Yohan Robinson, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Reviewed by:

Dorit Nitzan, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Jan-Cedric Hansen, Centre d'Hébergement et d'Accompagnement Gérontologique (CHAG), France

Copyright © 2024 Ishiki, Kurosawa, Narai, Sakai, Arima, Aihara, Yamagata, Katsuta, Mashiko, Oizumi and Furukawa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Katsutoshi Furukawa, a2Z1cnVrYXdhJiN4MDAwNDA7dG9ob2t1LW1wdS5hYy5qcA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.