Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med., 23 September 2024
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Prediction and Prevention of Complications in the Acute Postoperative Period View all 8 articles

The effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative awakening after general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

\r\nShangkun Si,,&#x;Shangkun Si1,2,3†Xiaohu Zhao&#x;Xiaohu Zhao4†Yuejun MuYuejun Mu5Li XuLi Xu4Fulei WangFulei Wang4Dongbin ZhangDongbin Zhang6Fan Su*Fan Su6*
  • 1First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
  • 2National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China
  • 3Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
  • 4Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
  • 5Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China
  • 6Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China

Background: The existing body of research concerning the impact of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on early postoperative recovery is marked by a lack of consensus. This meta-analysis, encompassing a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, seeks to critically assess the efficacy of TEAS in relation to awakening from general anaesthesia in the postoperative period.

Methods: The inclusion criteria for this study were peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials that evaluated the influence of TEAS on the process of regaining consciousness following general anaesthesia. A comprehensive search was conducted across several reputable databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the VIP Database, the SinoMed Database, and the WANFANG Medical Database. The search was not limited by date, extending from the inception of each database up to December 2023. The methodological quality and risk of bias within the included studies were appraised in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1, and its associated tool for assessing risk of bias.

Results: The analysis encompassed 29 studies involving a total of 2,125 patients. Participants in the TEAS group demonstrated a significantly shorter duration to achieve eye-opening [mean difference (MD), −3.16 min; 95% confidence interval (CI), −3.93 to −2.39], endotracheal extubation (MD, −4.28 min; 95% CI, −4.79 to −3.76), and discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (MD, −8.04 min; 95% CI, −9.48 to −6.61) when compared to the control group receiving no or sham stimulation. Additionally, the TEAS group exhibited markedly reduced mean arterial blood pressure (MD, −9.00 mmHg; 95% CI, −10.69 to −7.32), heart rate (MD, −7.62 beats/min; 95% CI, −9.02 to −6.22), and plasma concentrations of epinephrine (standardised MD, −0.81; 95% CI, −1.04 to −0.58), norepinephrine (MD, −47.67 pg/ml; 95% CI, −62.88 to −32.46), and cortisol (MD, −110.92 nmol/L; 95% CI, −131.28 to −90.56) at the time of extubation. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse effects, including agitation and coughing, was considerably lower in the TEAS group relative to the control group (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22–0.40).

Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that TEAS may hold promise in facilitating the return of consciousness, reducing the interval to awakening post-general anaesthesia, and enhancing the awakening process to be more tranquil and secure with a diminished likelihood of adverse events. However, caution must be exercised in interpreting these results due to the notable publication and geographical biases present among the studies under review. There is an imperative for further high-quality, low-bias research to substantiate these observations.

Systematic review registration: The review protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022382017).

1 Introduction

Prolonged awakening following general anaesthesia and adverse reactions during the awakening phase, such as stress disorders, hemodynamic instability, and agitation, can significantly compromise the quality of postoperative recovery (1). Narcotic antagonists and sedative-analgesic medications are commonly employed in the treatment of delayed awakening and agitation; however, they present risks including respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and potentially adverse cardiovascular events (2).

Acupuncture and acupoint stimulation, as non-pharmacological, complementary, and alternative therapies, offer a safe and efficacious approach with minimal side effects. They have been proposed to play a beneficial role in perioperative medicine, where they serve to reduce the dosage of anaesthetic agents, mitigate stress responses, protect organ function, decrease the incidence of complications, and enhance the quality of postoperative recovery, as supported by an extensive body of research (3). Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) represents a non-invasive electrical stimulation modality, integrating transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation from Western medicine with acupoint stimulation from traditional Chinese medicine. TEAS is typically administered by affixing self-adhesive electrodes, connected to a transcutaneous electrical stimulator, to the patient’s acupoints, with the stimulator parameters adjusted to provide the desired stimulation. It shares comparable therapeutic effects with traditional acupuncture, yet offers the advantages of being non-invasive and non-contagious, leading to high patient acceptance and practicality (4).

The current evidence regarding the efficacy of TEAS in the context of early postoperative recovery is inconsistent (47). Furthermore, there is a notable absence of meta-analyses specifically addressing the impact of TEAS on awakening following general anaesthesia. Consequently, informed by the principles of evidence-based medicine, this meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of TEAS on postoperative awakening after general anaesthesia, with the aim of contributing to the existing body of evidence.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Protocol and registration

This study adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines (8, 9). The PRISMA checklist is provided in Supplementary Table 1. The study design follows the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The review protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022382017).

2.2 Search strategy

The databases searched included PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the VIP Database, the SinoMed Database, and WANFANG Medical. The search spanned from the inception of each database to December 2023, without restrictions on language or publication date. The search strategy encompassed free-text terms such as: “general anaesthesia,” “awakening,” “emergence,” “recovery,” “open eyes,” “extubation,” “PACU (Post-anaesthesia Care Unit),” “acupoint,” “acupuncture,” “TAES,” and “electroacupuncture.”

Variations of these terms were also included, and the reference lists of relevant articles were manually reviewed for potentially eligible studies. The complete search strategy is detailed in Supplementary Table 2.

2.3 Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Study type: randomised controlled trials (RCTs). (2) Study subjects: patients undergoing general anaesthesia and surgery who received TEAS or blank/sham stimulation during the perioperative period, without restrictions on age, gender, or nationality. (3) Intervention: the TEAS group received TEAS during the perioperative period; the blank/sham stimulation group received no acupuncture stimulation or received stimulation at non-meridian, non-acupoint locations.

Exclusion criteria included: (1) Study type: prospective cohort studies/retrospective case-control studies/non-randomised studies, comments, editorials, letters, case reports, reviews, conference proceedings, or animal studies. (2) Study subjects/intervention: non-general anaesthesia surgical patients or other acupuncture therapy-related interventions (e.g., manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, ear point pressing beans, acupoint catgut embedding, acupressure, acupoint injection, etc.) were included in the study. (3) Studies where the original text was not available or where outcome indicators were incomplete.

2.4 Outcome indicators

The primary outcome measure of this study was the quality of awakening, which includes the speed of awakening (primary outcomes) and the smoothness of awakening (secondary outcomes). The speed of awakening encompassed the time to open eyes (minutes), time to extubation (minutes), and time to leave the PACU (minutes). The smoothness of awakening included hemodynamic stability at extubation, plasma stress hormone levels at extubation, and adverse reactions during the awakening period. Hemodynamic stability was assessed by mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg) and heart rate (HR, beats/min). Plasma stress hormone levels included those of epinephrine (E, standardised mean difference, units not specified), norepinephrine (NE, pg/ml), and cortisol (Cor, nmol/L). Adverse reactions during the awakening period encompassed agitation and cough.

2.5 Data extraction

Note Express v3.5.0 was utilised for managing the included research literature. Office Excel was employed for creating tables and summarising, deduplicating, screening, and extracting research data from the literature. The literature was initially screened by title and abstract, followed by a secondary screening based on the full text. Data such as authors’ names, years of publication, sample size, interventions, and outcome indicators were extracted from the final publications of the studies. Two researchers (authors of this work) performed data extraction separately and independently, followed by cross-checking. In the event of discrepancies, the matter was referred to the corresponding author for arbitration.

2.6 Quality assessment

The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane Systematic Review Manual 5.1 and its recommended Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The studies were assessed for “random sequence generation,” “allocation concealment,” “blinding of participants and trial personnel,” “blinding of outcome assessors,” “incomplete outcome data,” “selective reporting,” and “other biases.” The results of the bias assessment were categorised as “low risk,” “high risk,” or “unclear.” The quality assessment was conducted separately and independently by two researchers (authors of this work) and then cross-checked. Disagreements were resolved by referring to the corresponding author for arbitration.

2.7 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3, Cochrane Collaboration). Dichotomous variables were analysed using the odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variables were assessed with the mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. Inter-study heterogeneity was evaluated using a Chi-squared test at a significance level of α = 0.1, with the degree of heterogeneity determined based on I2 values. A P-value ≥ 0.1 and I2 value ≤50% indicated good homogeneity among the included studies, prompting the use of a fixed-effects model and OR for meta-analysis. A P-value < 0.1 and I2 value >50% indicated significant heterogeneity, necessitating subgroup analysis or sensitivity analysis to identify the source. If no significant clinical heterogeneity was present or the results were stable, the random-effects model and RR were selected for meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the results when studies with large weights were included. If the results from studies with substantial heterogeneity could not be reasonably addressed following these approaches (e.g., subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis), meta-analysis was not conducted, and only descriptive statistics were provided. If the number of included studies was sufficient (more than 10), the risk of publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots (visually) and the Egger regression test (Stata, version 17.0, Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA), with a P-value < 0.1 considered indicative of significant publication bias (10).

3 Results

3.1 Literature search

The initial search yielded 14,835 potentially relevant citations. After the exclusion of 7,421 duplicates, 6,143 based on title and abstract, and 1,242 based on full-text assessment, 29 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were ultimately included (1138), encompassing a total of 2,125 patients, with 1,060 in the TEAS group and 1,065 in the blank/sham stimulation group. The literature screening process is depicted in Figure 1. The basic characteristics of the included studies are outlined in Tables 1, 2.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) flow diagram.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristic of the included studies.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Details of interventions.

3.2 Quality assessment of included studies

The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and the overall quality was deemed satisfactory (Figures 2, 3). The certainty of evidence (GRADE) for each outcome is summarised in Table 3. Specific findings are as follows:

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Percentage plot of the risk of bias of the included studies.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Summary of the risk of bias of the included studies.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Certainty of evidence (grade).

1. Random sequence generation: Thirteen studies (11, 12, 1517, 19, 21, 25, 30, 33, 3537) utilised the random number table method. An additional 11 studies (13, 14, 18, 20, 22, 26, 28, 29, 31, 38, 39) employed computer-generated random grouping. One study employed envelope random assignment, another used stratified randomisation. Two studies (23, 32) referenced randomisation without detailing the sequence generation method, and one study (34) made no mention of randomisation.

2. Allocation concealment: Ten studies (11, 13, 1820, 24, 26, 2830) detailed the use of closed-envelope allocation concealment; the remaining studies did not report on allocation concealment.

3. Blinding of subjects and trial personnel: Thirteen studies (11, 13, 18, 20, 22, 26, 2832, 38, 39) reported the implementation of double-blinding. One study (24) blinded study personnel, while the remainder did not specify blinding methods.

4. Blinding of outcome assessors: Thirteen studies (11, 13, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 2832, 38) reported the blinding of outcome assessors. The remaining studies did not mention the blinding of outcome assessment.

5. Incomplete outcome data: Five studies (13, 15, 26, 28, 29) reported missing data, including withdrawals and lost visits, with no significant impact on effect sizes. The remaining studies reported no missing data.

6. Selective reporting: Of the 29 enrolled studies, 25 originated from China, which may introduce geographical bias. Four studies (20, 24, 29, 32) focused on craniotomies, potentially susceptible to publication bias. Three studies (20, 21, 24) were conducted by the team of Bai W, and two studies (35, 37) by the team of Yang Q, which could also contribute to publication bias.

7. Other bias: There was insufficient evidence or information to assess whether other serious risks of bias were present in the included studies.

3.3 The speed of awakening

Ten studies reported the time to eye opening in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group after general anaesthesia, involving 799 patients—400 in the TEAS group and 399 in the control group. The results indicated significant statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.02, I2 = 55%), leading to the exclusion of one study after sensitivity analysis (33). Upon retesting, heterogeneity was no longer significant (P = 0.13, I2 = 37%), with low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was thus employed for effect size calculation and analysis. The aggregated results demonstrated that the TEAS group had a significantly shorter time to eye opening compared to the blank/sham stimulation group (MD, −3.16 min; 95% CI, −3.93 to −2.39 min; P < 0.001), as depicted in Figure 4A.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Forest plots (speed of awakening). (A) Time to open eyes (min). (B) Time to extubation (min). (C) Time to leave the PACU (min). TEAS, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation group; control, blank/sham stimulation group.

Seventeen studies reported the time to extubation in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group after general anaesthesia, involving 1,194 patients—596 in the TEAS group and 598 in the control group. Initial results showed significant statistical heterogeneity (P < 0.001, I2 = 82%), and after sensitivity analysis, two studies were excluded (20, 27). Retesting revealed no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.04, I2 = 43%), with low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was used for effect size calculation and analysis. The overall results indicated that the TEAS group had a significantly shorter time to extubation compared to the blank/sham stimulation group (MD, −4.28 min; 95% CI, −4.79 to −3.76 min; P < 0.001), as shown in Figure 4B.

Ten studies reported the duration in the PACU in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group after general anaesthesia, involving 695 patients—346 in the TEAS group and 349 in the control group. Results showed significant statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.008, I2 = 60%), leading to the exclusion of one study after sensitivity analysis (34). Retesting showed no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.05, I2 = 48%), with low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was used for effect size calculation and analysis. The overall results demonstrated that the TEAS group had a significantly shorter duration in the PACU compared to the blank/sham stimulation group (MD, −8.04 min; 95% CI, −9.48 to −6.61 min; P < 0.001), as shown in Figure 4C.

3.4 The smoothness of awakening

Ten studies reported on MAP at extubation in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group, involving 657 patients—328 in the TEAS group and 329 in the control group. Results did not indicate significant statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.15, I2 = 32%), with low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was used for effect size calculation and analysis. The overall results showed that the MAP at extubation was significantly lower in the TEAS group than in the blank/sham stimulation group (MD, −9.00 mmHg; 95% CI, −10.69 to −7.32 mmHg; P < 0.001), as depicted in Figure 5A.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Forest plots (hemodynamic stability at extubation). (A) MAP at extubation (mmHg). (B) HR at extubation (beats/min). TEAS, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation group; Control, blank/sham stimulation group.

Eleven studies reported on HR at extubation in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group, involving 717 patients—358 in the TEAS group and 359 in the control group. Initial results showed significant statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.004, I2 = 62%), and after sensitivity analysis, one study was excluded (33). Retesting revealed no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.10, I2 = 38%), with low sensitivity and good stability. The overall results indicated that the HR at extubation was significantly lower in the TEAS group than in the blank/sham stimulation group (MD, −7.62 beats/min; 95% CI, −9.02 to −6.22 beats/min; P < 0.001), as shown in Figure 5B.

Six studies reported on plasma epinephrine levels at extubation in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group, involving 399 patients—199 in the TEAS group and 200 in the control group. Initial results showed significant statistical heterogeneity (P < 0.001, I2 = 94%), leading to the exclusion of one study after sensitivity analysis (17). Retesting showed no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.71, I2 = 0%), with low sensitivity and good stability. The overall results demonstrated that plasma epinephrine levels at extubation were significantly lower in the TEAS group than in the blank/sham stimulation group (SMD, −0.81; 95% CI, −1.04 to −0.58; P < 0.001), as shown in Figure 6A.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Forest plots (plasma stress hormone levels at extubation). (A) Plasma epinephrine at extubation (standardised mean difference, without units). (B) Plasma norepinephrine at extubation (pg/ml). (C) Plasma cortisol at extubation (nmol/L). TEAS, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation group; control, blank/sham stimulation group.

Six studies compared the TEAS group with the blank/sham stimulation group regarding plasma norepinephrine levels at extubation, involving a total of 399 patients—199 in the TEAS group and 200 in the control group. The analysis did not reveal significant statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.72, I2 = 0%), indicating low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was thus employed for effect size calculation and analysis. The combined results demonstrated that plasma norepinephrine levels at extubation were significantly lower in the TEAS group than in the blank/sham stimulation group (MD, −47.67 pg/ml; 95% CI, −62.88 to −32.46 pg/ml; P < 0.001), as illustrated in Figure 6B.

Four studies evaluated the levels of plasma cortisol at extubation between the TEAS group and the blank/sham stimulation group, including 279 patients—139 in the TEAS group and 140 in the control group. Initial analysis showed significant statistical heterogeneity (P < 0.001, I2 = 96%), prompting the exclusion of one study after sensitivity analysis (20). Subsequent analysis did not indicate significant heterogeneity (P = 0.54, I2 = 0%), with low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was used for effect size calculation and analysis. The results showed that plasma cortisol levels at extubation were significantly lower in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group (MD, −110.92 nmol/L; 95% CI, −131.28 to −90.56 nmol/L; P < 0.001), as depicted in Figure 6C.

Twelve studies assessed the incidence of agitation in the TEAS group versus the blank/sham stimulation group during the awakening period, encompassing 973 patients—486 in the TEAS group and 487 in the control group. The analysis did not reveal significant statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.08, I2 = 39%), indicating low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was used for effect size calculation and analysis. The aggregated results indicated a significantly lower incidence of agitation in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.21–0.40; P < 0.001). Three studies evaluated the incidence of cough in the TEAS group versus the blank/sham stimulation group during the awakening period, involving 195 patients—97 in the TEAS group and 98 in the control group. The analysis did not reveal significant statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.94, I2 = 0%), indicating low sensitivity and good stability. A fixed-effects model was used for effect size calculation and analysis. The results showed a significantly lower incidence of cough in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18–0.61; P < 0.001). The combined subgroup analysis demonstrated a significantly lower overall incidence of adverse reactions in the TEAS group compared to the blank/sham stimulation group (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22–0.40; P < 0.001), as shown in Figure 7.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Forest plots (adverse reactions). TEAS, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation group; control, blank/sham stimulation group.

The summary of the results is presented in Table 4.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Summary of results.

3.5 Publication bias

Using “Time to extubation” and “Adverse reactions” as examples, funnel plots were constructed using Review Manager 5.3, as displayed in Figure 8. The plots exhibited poor symmetry about the central axis, and the Egger regression test results indicated significant statistical publication bias (Time to extubation: P = 0.066; Adverse reactions: P = 0.092). Furthermore, the findings of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the potential for bias related to specific surgery types, articles from the same research team, and geographical bias.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. The funnel plot. (A) Time to extubation. (B) Adverse reactions.

4 Discussion

4.1 Analysis of study results

Existing meta-analyses on the perioperative applications of acupuncture therapy and acupoint stimulation encompass a diverse array of interventions. These include invasive acupuncture modalities (e.g., manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, etc.), transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation, auricular point pressure beans, acupressure, and the application or implantation of threads at acupoints. This heterogeneity inevitably introduces various biases and clinical heterogeneities, which can undermine the confidence in the findings (40). To mitigate these issues, the present study exclusively included trials utilising TEAS to ensure a uniformity of intervention. The selection of acupuncture points is pivotal for the efficacy of TEAS, with the studies reviewed selecting points such as PC6, LI4, and ST36, among others. These points adhere to the established selection criteria for acupuncture and acupoint stimulation therapies during the perioperative period in recent years (3). According to contemporary principles of traditional Chinese medicine, stimulation of the acupoints PC6, LI4, and ST36 is believed to enhance the circulation of qi and blood, invigorate meridians and collaterals, alleviate pain by unblocking qi, and tranquillise the mind (12). Furthermore, the temporal parameters, frequency, and intensity of the stimulation are known to significantly influence the efficacy of TEAS. Evidence suggests that TEAS administered 30 min prior to anaesthetic induction and sustained for a minimum of 30 min can augment the effects of sedation and analgesia (17). In the majority of studies included in this analysis, the stimulation was initiated no later than 20–30 min before the commencement of anaesthesia and continued until the conclusion of the surgical procedure. The selection of electroacupuncture frequency can differentially activate neurotransmitters within the brain. For instance, stimulation at 2 Hz has been shown to trigger the release of substantial quantities of endorphins and enkephalins in both the brain and spinal cord, whereas stimulation at 100 Hz can induce the release of significant amounts of dynorphin in the spinal cord (41). The majority of studies analysed herein employed an alternating pattern of sparse and dense waves at 2 and 100 Hz, respectively. This approach is capable of simultaneously releasing the aforementioned peptides, ensuring the therapeutic effect, prolonging the duration of action, and achieving a synergistic impact.

This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients in the TEAS group experienced a more rapid awakening process, as evidenced by shorter times to eye opening, extubation, and departure from the PACU, when compared to the control group receiving blank/sham stimulation. These findings suggest that the perioperative application of TEAS may facilitate the recovery of consciousness and the awakening of patients following general anaesthesia. Additionally, the TEAS group exhibited lower MAP, HR, and plasma levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol at the time of extubation, indicating that TEAS can attenuate the stress response and stabilise haemodynamics during the awakening phase post-general anaesthesia. Moreover, the incidence of adverse reactions, such as agitation and coughing, was significantly reduced in the TEAS group relative to the blank/sham stimulation group, which underscores the safety of perioperative TEAS application.

4.2 Clinical effects and mechanisms

Investigations have demonstrated that TEAS possesses the capacity to inhibit the transmission of peripheral nociceptive information, mitigate central sensitisation, and facilitate the secretion of endogenous analgesic mediators within the central nervous system (CNS) (24). Furthermore, TEAS can modulate corresponding receptors, thereby elevating the pain threshold and exerting an adjunctive sedative influence through the inhibition of the hypothalamic-limbic system (25). In addition to these effects, TEAS has been shown to regulate systemic levels of inflammatory markers and curtail inflammatory responses (13). It also diminishes the concentration of brain oedema-associated molecules, such as Aquaporin-4 (AQP-4) and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), as well as the brain injury marker S100-β (19). TEAS exerts a regulatory influence on the neurohumoral-endocrine system, thereby preserving human physiological homeostasis and diminishing the disruptive impact of adverse stressors, such as those induced by anaesthesia and surgical trauma, on normal bodily functions.

In summary, the adjunctive application of TEAS in the perioperative period not only serves to augment the efficacy of anaesthesia and reduce the requisite dosage of intraoperative sedatives and analgesics, but also accelerates the postoperative restoration of consciousness and the awakening process in patients. TEAS also holds significant clinical importance in the realms of maintaining haemodynamic stability, attenuating adverse stress reactions and agitation during the awakening phase, and enhancing the overall quality of postoperative recovery (2, 7).

4.3 Limitations and implications

This study had several limitations that may have impacted the comprehensiveness of the findings. Notably, indicators such as the recovery of autonomous ventilation and the restoration of orientation were not assessed, nor was the consumption of narcotic drugs analysed, which could limit the generalisability of the results. Furthermore, inconsistencies in the units of plasma epinephrine across the included studies may have affected the reliability of the comparative analysis. Additional postoperative recovery indicators, including postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and cognitive function, were not examined, potentially restricting the applicability of the findings to short-term postoperative recovery outcomes.

Variations in the initiation, duration, selection of acupuncture points, and the type of equipment, current frequency, and intensity of TEAS among the included studies could have introduced heterogeneity in the outcomes. Additionally, differences in the age, gender, and surgical procedures of the patients could also account for variations in the results. Temporal and geographical disparities among the trial centres may have generated systematic errors, while the omission of patients’ occupational and educational backgrounds could further contribute to heterogeneity. Some studies lacked explicit mention of randomisation and allocation concealment or failed to report specific methodologies, which could introduce bias. Furthermore, only a subset of studies described the implementation of blinding methods; the absence of blinding can increase the risk of measurement bias. Moreover, some studies did not report the rationale for their sample size estimation, raising concerns about potential underpowered analyses.

Clearly, there is a need for multicentre, large-sample size studies that adhere to the STRICTA and CONSORT guidelines for designing and reporting clinical trials, utilising standardised outcome measures to provide high-quality, low-bias evidence to guide clinical practice.

5 Conclusion

In summary, the current evidence indicates that TEAS may offer potential benefits in facilitating the recovery of consciousness, reducing the time to awakening following general anaesthesia, and improving the awakening process to be smoother and safer with a lower incidence of adverse reactions. However, caution must be exercised in interpreting these findings due to the potential for bias within the included studies. Further high-quality, low-bias research is necessary to substantiate these results.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

SS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YM: Writing – review & editing. LX: Writing – review & editing. FW: Writing – review & editing. DZ: Writing – review & editing. FS: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Ji’nan Science and Technology Innovation Development Plan (202134068 to FS), Ji’nan “20 New Universities” Scientific Research Leader Studio Project (202228124 to FS).

Acknowledgments

We thank Zhenzhen Gao (Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Interpreting Studies) for polishing up the language. We also thank Dr. Deng Shizhe, Dr. Zhuo Bifang, and Professor Meng Zhihong from the First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion) provided crucial help (including but not limited to methodology, supervision, project administration, validation, polishing, and investigation, etc.).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1347641/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Su F, Cui S, Wang X, Yu J, Wang Q, Qin Y, et al. Considerations of core technology of Chinese anesthesiology based on integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine. Chin J Anesthesiol. (2022) 42:641–9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Si S, Zhao Q, Zhang D, Ji J, Zhang W, Su F. Research progress of prevention and management of delayed awakening after general anesthesia in Chinese and Western medicine. J Clin Anesthesiol. (2022) 38:1092–6. doi: 10.12089/jca.2022.10.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhang W, Zhang H, Wang SM, Guo J, Ma Y, Li Y, et al. Perioperative acupuncture optimizes surgical outcomes: Theory, clinical practice and future perspectives. Am J Chin Med. (2022) 50:961–78. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X22500392

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chen J, Tu Q, Miao S, Zhou Z, Hu S. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. (2020) 73:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Akca O, Sessler DI. Acupuncture. A useful complement of anesthesia? Minerva Anestesiol. (2002) 68:147–51.

Google Scholar

6. Zhang T, Ou L, Chen Z, Li J, Shang Y, Hu G. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for the prevention of postoperative cognitive dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. (2021) 8:756366. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.756366

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kwon S, Jin C, Jeong A, Yang SB. Effects of acupuncture on postoperative recovery and extubation time: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). (2021) 100:e24502. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024502

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. (2017) 358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. (2007) 8:16. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Li Y, Ma Y, Guo W, Ge W, Cheng Y, Jin C, et al. Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative pain in pediatric orthopedic surgery with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. (2023) 42:101273. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Meng X, Li J, Zhang Q, Han S, Wei D. Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on emergence agitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Chin J Anesthesiol. (2022) 42:147–50. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20211203.00205

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Xing R, Yang Y, Zhang M, Wang H, Tan M, Gao C, et al. Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Pain Ther. (2022) 11:1327–39. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00429-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gao P, Shao B, Diao Y, Zhang T, Li L. Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on catheter related bladder discomfort after ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2020) 40:829–33. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20190729-k0001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Jin W, Mo Y, Jiang Q, Jin D, Dai Q, Pan W, et al. Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on the postoperative recovery quality and long-term survival quality in breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy. Chin J Integr Tradit Chin Western Med. (2020) 40:1315–21. doi: 10.7661/j.cjim.20201012.192

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Zhan H, Zhou Q, Zhang X, Liang X, Song J, Sun Y. Effect of percutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation on postoperative maladaptive behavior in children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Clin Anesthesiol. (2020) 36:330–3. doi: 10.12089/jca.2020.04.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhang S, Gan J, Tu Q, Li F, Gu S, Shi J. Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on stress response during extubation period in patients undergoing thoracoscope pneumoresection. Anhui Med Pharm J. (2020) 24:1407–11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2020.07.035

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Nakamura N, Mihara T, Hijikata T, Goto T, Ka K. Unilateral electrical stimulation of the heart 7 acupuncture point to prevent emergence agitation in children: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. (2018) 13:e204533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204533

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yang Y, Lu Z, Dong H, Chen M, Cheng D, Xiong L. Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on recovery of patients undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery. J Clin Anesthesiol. (2018) 34:11–5. doi: 10.12089/jca.2018.01.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Bai W, Yang Y, Teng X, Wan Y, Wei W, Zhu J. Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on the stress response during extubation after general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. (2018) 30:337–46. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000460

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bai W, Huang X, Teng X, Yang Y, Li Y, Wei W, et al. Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on stress response during extubation of general anesthesia after thyroidectomy. Prog Modern Biomed. (2017) 17:96–9. doi: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.01.024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Huang S, Peng W, Tian X, Liang H, Jia Z, Lo T, et al. Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at different frequencies on perioperative anesthetic dosage, recovery, complications, and prognosis in video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Anesth. (2017) 31:58–65. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2057-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lin J, Tang H, Xu L, Li B. [Effect of acupuncture at the foot San Li and San Yin Jiao points as an aid to anesthesia on perioperative pain in gynecology]. J Yunnan Univers Tradit Chin Med. (2017) 40:75–8. doi: 10.19288/j.cnki.issn.1000-2723.2017.06.022

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Bai W, Teng X, Yang Y, Wei W, Huang X, Wan Y, et al. Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on stress response during extubation in elderly patients undergoing brain surgery. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med. (2016) 34:2520–3. doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2016.10.061

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Guo F, Song W, Wang J, Yuan L. [Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on agitation during awakening in 30 patients under general anesthesia with sevoflurane]. Jiangsu Chin Med. (2016) 48:60–2.

Google Scholar

26. Hijikata T, Mihara T, Nakamura N, Miwa T, Ka K, Goto T. Electrical stimulation of the heart 7 acupuncture site for preventing emergence agitation in children: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. (2016) 33:535–42. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000379

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhu J, Bai W, Teng X, Yang Y, Li Y. Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on stress response during extubation in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy surgery. J China Med Univers. (2016) 45:154–7. doi: 10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2016.02.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Chen Y, Yang Y, Yao Y, Dai D, Qian B, Liu P. Does transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation improve the quality of recovery after thyroidectomy? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. (2015) 8:13622–7.

Google Scholar

29. Liu X, Li S, Wang B, An L, Ren X, Wu H. Intraoperative and postoperative anaesthetic and analgesic effect of multipoint transcutaneous electrical acupuncture stimulation combined with sufentanil anaesthesia in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. Acupunct Med. (2015) 33:270–6. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2014-010749

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yao Y, Zhao Q, Gong C, Wu Y, Chen Y, Qiu L, et al. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation improves the postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2015) 2015:324360. doi: 10.1155/2015/324360

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wang H, Xie Y, Zhang Q, Xu N, Zhong H, Dong H, et al. Transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation reduces intra-operative remifentanil consumption and alleviates postoperative side-effects in patients undergoing sinusotomy: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. (2014) 112:1075–82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Chen X, An L, Wang L, Wu H, Wang B. Application of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation and inhalation anesthesia in supratentorial tumor resection. Shanghai J Acu Mox. (2013) 32:79–82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0957.2013.02.79

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Gong L, Yu J, Cao X, Wang M, Dong S, Zhang Y. General anesthesia combined with acupuncture in abdominal surgery for elderly patients. Chin J Integr Chin Western Med Surg. (2013) 19:650–2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2013.06.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Xing Z, Ren Y, Tao M, Zhang X. Study on the value of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation with general intravenous anesthesia in subtotal thyroidectomy surgery. Modern J Integr Tradit Chin Western Med. (2012) 21:2065–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2012.19.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Yang Q, Ma W, Li Y. Comparison of effects of acupuncture-assisted anesthesia with different acupoint combination in gynecologic laparoscopy operation. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2012) 32:59–64.

Google Scholar

36. Yu J, Qu P, Fan H, Wang Z, Jin Y, Tao F. Observation on the analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for breast radical carcinoma operation. Acupunct Res. (2010) 35:43–6. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.2010.01.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Yang Q, Ma W, Sha X, Zheng J, Luo Y, Cai C. The clinical study of acupuncture-assisted anesthesia for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Guangdong Med J. (2008) 75:1263–6. doi: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.2008.08.040

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Coloma M, White PF, Ogunnaike BO, Markowitz SD, Brown PM, Lee AQ, et al. Comparison of acustimulation and ondansetron for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology. (2002) 97:1387–92. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. White PF, Issioui T, Hu J, Jones SB, Coleman JE, Waddle JP, et al. Comparative efficacy of acustimulation (ReliefBand) versus ondansetron (Zofran) in combination with droperidol for preventing nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology. (2002) 97:1075–81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200211000-00008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Chen C, Guo S, Hao Y, Ai Y, Jiang L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture and moxibustion: Existing problems and countermeasures. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2021) 41:1387–93. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20201207-k0002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Asmussen S, Maybauer DM, Chen JD, Fraser JF, Toon MH, Przkora R, et al. Effects of acupuncture in anesthesia for craniotomy: A meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. (2017) 29:219–27. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000290

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: acupuncture points, anaesthesia recovery period, general anaesthesia, meta-analysis, perioperative period, surgery, systematic review, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation

Citation: Si S, Zhao X, Mu Y, Xu L, Wang F, Zhang D and Su F (2024) The effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative awakening after general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 11:1347641. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1347641

Received: 01 December 2023; Accepted: 06 May 2024;
Published: 23 September 2024.

Edited by:

Guangyou Duan, Chongqing Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Andrea Glotta, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Switzerland
Hua Xu, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China

Copyright © 2024 Si, Zhao, Mu, Xu, Wang, Zhang and Su. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fan Su, Ym9hdHNhaWxAMTI2LmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.