Case report: The first account of undifferentiated sarcoma with epithelioid features originating in the pleura

Undifferentiated epithelioid sarcoma (USEF) is a rare subtype of undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma that presents unique challenges in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Here, we report a case of USEF occurring in the pleura of a 51-year-old man for the first time. Thoracoscopic examination revealed widespread nodular changes, and pathological analysis confirmed the presence of numerous epithelioid atypical cells. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis demonstrated an undifferentiated phenotype with distinct characteristics: epithelial membrane antigen (foci +), vimentin (+), Ki-67 (+70% +), TTF-1 (+), P53 (mutant type +90%), INI-1 (+), and CK5/6 (small foci +). Immunohistochemical examination of the tumor showed that the tumor was an undifferentiated epithelioid sarcoma. High-throughput DNA sequencing revealed pivotal mutations, including a nonsense mutation in the NF1 gene (c.641A > G(p.H214R)). and critical TP53 missense mutation (c.641A > G(p.H214R)). This TP53 mutation, with a tumor mutation burden of 16.5 Muts/Mb, signifies a high level of genomic instability, likely contributing to the rapid progression and aggressiveness of the disease. Detection of the TP53 mutation provides essential insights, indicating the disease’s rapid progression and highlighting the potential for targeted therapies. Although the patient’s disease progressed extremely rapidly and he tragically died within a week, we discussed the results of IHC and DNA sequencing in detail and discussed his possible treatment options. Insights gained from this case will be critical in shaping future diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms for USEF, particularly in the context of TP53 mutations.

1 Introduction

Undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma (USTS) constitutes a rare and heterogeneous group of soft tissue cancers that pose challenges for their effective differentiation using current diagnostic tools. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma, undifferentiated round cell sarcoma, and undifferentiated epithelioid sarcoma (USEF) are among the subtypes of USTS (1). However, the existing literature on USEF is notably sparse.

USEF is commonly identified in older age groups, displaying no gender bias and often presenting with a larger size at diagnosis. It frequently occurs centrally, such as in the proximal thigh and torso (1). Traditional treatment methods for USEF, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, present significant challenges due to the biological complexity and varied treatment responses of USEF, resulting in a generally poor prognosis (2).

Due to limited research, the understanding of USTS and their anticipated outcomes remains insufficient. Among adults, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) originating from the limbs or trunk has been reported to have a 5-year metastasis-free survival rate of 83% (3). However, USEF appears to exhibit higher aggressiveness (2). highlighting the importance of discussing potential therapeutic approaches.

In this report, we aim to provide a comprehensive and detailed description of a unique case involving a pleural tumor presenting as USEF, contributing to an enhanced understanding of this extremely rare condition.

2 Case description

A 51-year-old man was admitted to the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine on March 31, 2023, with a 5-month history of cough and sputum and recent exacerbation of shortness of breath, wheezing, and fatigue lasting for 3 days. He had a 20-year history of smoking (approximately 20 cigarettes per day) and alcohol consumption (approximately 200 mL per day) and no known family history of cancer, genetic diseases, psychiatric disorders, nor a history of long-term medication use. Additionally, there was no evidence of current or previous soft tissue tumors or history of radiation exposure. Physical examination revealed diminished breath sounds in the right lung with solid percussion.

Upon admission, the patient’s complete blood work showed abnormal values. Specifically, the CRP was significantly high at 69.84 mg/L (<10 mg/L), and the leukocyte count was elevated at 16.88 × 10^9/L (3.50–9.50 × 10^9/L). Chest computed tomography (CT) demonstrated substantial right pleural effusion, causing significant compression of the right lung, and irregular thickening of the right pleura, measuring approximately 14.7 mm at its thickest point (Figures 1A,B), with no evidence of lymph node or visceral dissemination at presentation. Subsequent thoracentesis was performed, and the pleural fluid, appearing hemorrhagic, was identified as an exudate. Biochemical analysis indicated high lactate dehydrogenase levels.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) The patient’s chest CT (lung window) exhibited extensive right pleural effusion. (B) The mediastinal window of the chest CT revealed significant right lung compression and irregular pleural thickening. (C) Thoracoscopy exposed diffuse nodular changes of diverse sizes in the parietal pleura along with substantial hemorrhagic effusion in the pleural cavity.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the pleural effusion sample further revealed cytokeratin (CK) (foci +), vimentin (+), calretinin (−), MC (−), D2–40 (−), CK5/6 (−), TTF − 1 (+), NapsinA (−), P63 (−), CK7 (foci +), Ki-67 (+30%+), and WT-1 (−). This comprehensive analysis played a crucial role in elucidating the underlying pathology and guiding subsequent steps in patient management. Images of immunohistochemical staining are shown in Supplementary Figure S1.

The patient underwent a thoracoscopic biopsy, which revealed a significant amount of hemorrhagic pleural effusion within the pleural cavity. The pleural wall exhibited diffuse nodular lesions of varying sizes (Figure 1C). The pathological biopsy revealed a grayish-white color on the cut surface. Microscopic examination of sections prepared from the surgical specimen displayed extensive areas filled with epithelioid atypical cells. These cells were large and had abundant cytoplasm, and some areas showed eosinophilic staining. The nuclei were large, with a high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio. In some tumor cells, nucleoli were visible, and pathological nuclear division was apparent (Figure 2A).

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) HE staining finding at 20x magnification of the ultrasound-guided endoscopic fine-needle aspiration (USEF) sample from the right parietal pleura is shown. (B) Immunohistochemical staining for CK5/6 shows positive staining in small foci. (C) Immunohistochemical staining for EMA demonstrates positive staining in the lesion. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for INI-1 shows positive results. (E) Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 shows a high proliferation index with >70% positivity. (F) Immunohistochemical staining for P53 shows a mutant type with approximately 90% positive staining. (G) Immunohistochemical staining for TTF-1 indicates positive results. (H) Immunohistochemical staining for vimentin (Vim) shows positive staining.

IHC analysis of the pleural nodules revealed the following results: epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) (foci +), Vim (+), Ki-67 (+70% +), TTF-1 (+), P53 (mutant type +90%), P40(−), calretinin (−), INI-1 (+), CK5/6 (small foci +), WT-1 (−), NapsinA (−), and CK7 (−). The immunohistochemical phenotype was undifferentiated, complicating the determination of the origin of tumor cells (Figures 2B–H).

Next,-Generation Sequencing covered exons, fusion-related introns, variable splicing regions, and specific microsatellite (MS) site areas of 506 genes associated with soft tissue sarcoma typing and mutations, totaling approximately 1.73-Mb base positions. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) revealed two significant mutations: a nonsense mutation in the NF1 gene, c.3721C > T(p.R1241*), depicted in Figure 3A, and a missense mutation in the TP53 gene, c.641A > G(p.H214R), illustrated in Figure 3B. The abundance and specific details of these mutations are summarized in Table 1. For comprehensive data on additional gene mutations identified in this study, please refer to Supplementary Table S1. Additionally, a high tumor mutation burden (TMB) of 16.5 Muts/Mb was noted. These findings related to NF1 and TP53 are significant as they could influence the tumor’s characteristics and potential treatment strategies. Additionally, MS instability–high (MSI-H) status was not detected, and HLA-I typing was assessed as partially pure. However, these findings did not clarify the origin of the tumor cells.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The comprehensive genomic profiling based on Next-Generation Sequencing has revealed a nonsense mutation in the NF1 gene (c.3721C > T(p.R1241*)) (A) within the USEF component and a missense mutation in the TP53 gene (c.641A > G(p.H214R)) (B).

Table 1

Table 1. Main mutation frequencies of unclassified sarcoma with epithelioid features.

Considering the unfavorable prognosis and high treatment costs, the patient chose against aggressive therapies, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Instead, the patient received targeted supportive care. However, the patient’s condition rapidly deteriorated. Within a week, he developed respiratory failure with persistent hypotension, unresponsive to vasopressors. This was accompanied by significantly elevated infection markers: leukocyte count leukocyte count was 24.61 × 10^9/L (3.50–9.50 × 10^9/L), Procalcitonin (PCT) level was 1.2798 ng/mL(0.0000–0.0500 ng/mL), and CRP was >200 mg/L (<10 mg/L). Due to these circumstances, the family decided to cease all treatments, and the patient unfortunately died on April 7, 2023 (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Timeline scheme of the major clinical event of the patient.

3 Immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing techniques

IHC was performed in the Department of Pathology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Initially, the slides undergo dewaxing and hydration. Subsequently, they are incubated in a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity. This step is followed by washing the slides three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7, each time for 3 min. The slides are then placed in a citrate buffer solution (pH 6.0) and subjected to microwave heating for antigen retrieval, twice, each time for 10 min. After heating, the slides are allowed to cool at room temperature. Subsequently, they are again washed three times with PBS at pH 7.4, each for 3 min. Depending on the tissue size, an appropriate amount of primary antibody is applied and incubated overnight at 4°C. After incubation, the slides are washed three times with PBS, each for 3 min. This is followed by the addition of an appropriate amount of enzyme-labeled polymer goat anti-mouse/rabbit IgG; thereafter, the slides undergo incubation at room temperature for 20 min. After incubation, the slides are washed three times with PBS, each for 3 min. Finally, the slides are visualized using a freshly prepared diaminobenzidine chromogen solution. Post-visualization, the slides are rinsed with PBS and counterstained with hematoxylin. We added positive and negative controls during the experiment to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the staining process, as seen in Supplementary Figure S2. IHC results are evaluated and interpreted by independent pathologists.

Next,-Generation Sequencing (NGS) was performed employing the GENESEEQ PRIME^™ platform (Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China). The process encompassed the following steps: Nucleic Acid Extraction: Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) nucleic acids were extracted using the FFPE Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit (Geneseeq Medical Device and Diagnostic Inc., Nanjing, China). Library Preparation: the library was constructed using the EGFR/ALK/ROS1/BRAF/KRAS/HER2 Gene Mutation Detection Kit (Geneseeq Medical Device and Diagnostic Inc., Nanjing, China). The method utilized for sequencing was the reversible terminator-based method, which offers high accuracy and read lengths. DNA Quantification and Purity Assessment: DNA concentration in the prepared samples was quantified using the highly sensitive Qubit^® 3.0 Fluorometer along with the Qubit^® DNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, United States). The purity of the DNA was assessed using the NanoDrop^™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, United States).

4 Discussion

Due to the limited ongoing research on USEF, both identification and treatment pose significant challenges. Treating USEF is notably difficult due to the scarcity of prospective studies and reliance on case reports within the academic community. In the present case, the patient initially exhibited symptoms of cough, sputum production, wheezing, and fatigue, leading to hospitalization. Throughout the diagnostic process, we utilized various methods, including chest CT, thoracoscopic pleural biopsy, immunocytochemical analysis (ICC), IHC, and genetic testing. Among these methods, ICC analysis is a rapid, minimally invasive, and cost-effective diagnostic tool, offering lower invasiveness, reduced complication risks, lower costs, and faster results than tissue biopsy. This approach proves particularly effective for differential diagnosis in patients with pleural effusion. Additionally, the utilization of positron emission tomography–CT scans holds significant value in such cases, allowing for the assessment of tumor response to treatment before and after therapy.

According to the 2020 WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours, USTS can broadly be categorized into pleomorphic, spindle cell, round cell, and epithelioid subgroups (4). However, they lack specific defining features other than the absence of recognizable differentiation. Among these, UPS represents the largest group, with USEF being less extensively studied. The diagnostic criteria for USEF include epithelioid cell morphology and the absence of any immunohistochemical feature of specific differentials, demonstrating the absence of distinctive molecular aberration.

USEF represents a heterogeneous group of tumors that share certain pathological and immunohistochemical characteristics with epithelioid sarcoma (ES). However, these tumors do not meet the criteria for a definitive ES diagnosis (2). Studies have indicated that CK and EMA are more frequently present in ES, with a majority of ES cases exhibiting a loss of INI-1, as demonstrated using IHC (5). In contrast, every USEF sample expresses at least one epithelial marker (pan-CK and/or EMA). Unlike ES, USEF usually does not express CD34, and the absence of INI-1 and expression of CA-125 are less common (2). In this particular case, locally positive EMA and positive INI-1 were observed.

USEF is typically diagnosed by exclusion. MPM serves as a significant differential diagnosis based on radiological features. The presence of CK5/6 might suggest an MPM phenotype, but the absence of WT-1, calretinin, and D2-40, which are typically positive in MPM, reduces the likelihood of this condition (6). Additionally, although this case included an examination of pleural effusion cytology, it failed to identify MPM-associated markers, such as MTAP, 5-hmC, GLUT1, IMP3, and EZH2 (7).

From a clinical incidence perspective, differentiating pleural tumors from pleural metastasis caused by primary lung cancer is crucial (8). The presence of TTF-1 and Vim, which can also be seen in some cases of lung adenocarcinoma, suggests this possibility (9). However, the absence of CK7 and NapsinA further rules out the likelihood of lung adenocarcinoma (10).

After eliminating common tumors, it is crucial to consider and exclude rare conditions such as SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma. This recently discovered and uncommon condition is suggested by the presence of TTF-1, EMA, CK, INI-1, and Vim. However, the final next-generation sequencing test ruled out the possibility by not detecting the SMARCA4 inactivating mutation (11, 12).

In this study, the expression rate of Ki-67 in patient lesions exceeded 70%, signifying a significant predictor of poor prognosis. Ki-67, a nuclear protein associated with cellular proliferation, has elevated expression levels closely correlated with worsened clinical outcomes, especially in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS) (13). A high Ki-67 proliferation index has been established as a critical factor affecting the prognosis of patients with STS. A prospective study has indicated that using a Ki-67 grading system for assessing STS malignancy is more effective and reproducible than the traditional system adopted by the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) (14).

Finally, the diagnosis of USEF is made based on the absence of lineage-specific markers or corresponding fusion and mutation genes, as well as considering its histological appearance as epithelioid. Understanding this rare, the diagnosis of highly invasive soft tissue tumor requires careful examination of available literature. Reported cases of USEF, excluding occasional cases reported in non-English literature, have been summarized in Table 2.

Table 2

Table 2. Previously reported cases of unclassified sarcoma with epithelioid features.

Due to their high malignancy, tendency for early metastasis, rapid progression, and poor prognosis, surgery has become the primary treatment method for undifferentiated sarcomas. According to the 8th edition of the AJCC classification for soft tissue sarcomas, this case was classified as stage T1N0M0 II, thus making surgery the preferred treatment (15). Preoperative radiotherapy is an option, with benefits including a lower total dose and reduced irradiation of normal tissue volumes. However, its major drawback is the increased risk of acute wound healing complications. Regardless of the type of resection, excellent local control rates are achieved when preoperative radiotherapy is incorporated into patient care (16, 17).

Treatment options for sarcomas also include chemotherapy. Standard chemotherapy agents for undifferentiated sarcomas include doxorubicin, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel (18, 19). However, there is currently no standard treatment protocol specifically for USEF, and not all patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas benefit from conventional chemotherapy.

Targeted therapy is pivotal in treating patients resistant to or who have failed conventional chemotherapy. Anlotinib has demonstrated efficacy in refractory metastatic UPS, with a 12-week progression-free rate of 58% and median progression-free survival of 4.1 months (20).

Additionally, in this case, we detected a nonsense mutation p.R1241* in the NF1 gene, which may lead to NF1 protein inactivation, increasing Ras-GTP levels and activating downstream RAS pathways, thereby promoting excessive cell proliferation. NF1 inactivating mutations might reduce sensitivity to EGFR-targeted drugs, although clinical evidence remains insufficient (21). This mutation could also increase sensitivity to MEK inhibitors such as selumetinib (22).

In this case, the detected p.H214R missense mutation in the TP53 gene could diminish the tumor-suppressing function of TP53 and is associated with tumor progression and chemotherapy resistance (23). Adavosertib, a WEE1 kinase inhibitor targeting G2 checkpoint control, has shown potential efficacy in preclinical studies against TP53-mutated tumor cells, especially in combination with chemotherapy (24). Further phase II clinical trials have found that Adavosertib significantly enhances chemotherapy sensitivity in patients with TP53 mutations (25). Phase Ib clinical trials have indicated that the combination of Adavosertib and Olaparib is safe and effective in some patients with TP53 mutations (26). These findings underscore the importance of TP53 mutations in guiding drug choices for this case, with Adavosertib being a potential treatment option.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, for the treatment of undifferentiated sarcomas (27). The high TMB detected in this case further enhances the potential for immunotherapy. Exome sequencing revealed a TMB of 16.5 Muts/Mb, suggesting that the patient may respond well to pembrolizumab immunotherapy. FDA has approved pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with solid tumors with high TMB (TMB-H) (28). In the KEYNOTE-158 trial, patients with high TMB showed significant overall response rates (29). TP53 mutations might be positive predictors for immunotherapy, as such genetic alterations can lead to increased PD-L1 expression (30). Patients with TP53 mutations, especially those with concurrent TP53/KRAS mutations, could significantly benefit from PD-1 inhibitors (31, 32). Therefore, considering the high TMB and presence of TP53 mutation, pembrolizumab immunotherapy emerges as a promising treatment option for this case. We summarize the treatment strategies for unclassified sarcomas with epithelioid features outlining treatment in Table 3.

Table 3

Table 3. Overview of treatment strategies for unclassified sarcoma with epithelioid features therapy.

Tumor DNA sequencing serves a dual purpose: guiding drug selection and providing prognostic insights into the disease course. In this case, we detected a TP53 mutation in the patient. This mutation, identified as pathogenic in multiple databases, including UMD, is anticipated to reduce the tumor-suppressive function of the TP53 gene. It is likely involved in tumor development, progression, and poor prognosis. To discuss the impact of TP53 mutations on tumor progression, especially given the rapid progression of the tumor in this case, in Table 4, we incorporate TP53 mutations that show a positive correlation with outcomes or overall survival.

Table 4

Table 4. TP53 mutation types and their impact on survival and prognosis across three different types of cancers.

This case represents the first instance of USEF originating from the pleura encountered by our team, marked by its rapid development and challenges in detection. Despite the patient’s decision to forego antineoplastic treatment, the severity and invasiveness of USEF were underscored by the disease’s swift advancement, culminating in the patient’s death due to respiratory failure. Given that the patient did not receive any form of treatment, this report primarily focuses on the diagnosis of USEF and the discussions surrounding potential therapeutic implications based on the patient’s NGS results. In this context, we thoroughly analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics of this specific case, contemplate the patient’s potential treatment options, and provide insights for future care strategies in similar scenarios.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, PRJNA1063166.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

L-XX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. LL: Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. WD: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work is supported by the Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical Research Project (no. 2023MSXM091), the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (no. cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0008), and the Senior Medical Talents Program of Chongqing for Young and Middle-Aged (no. 2020219).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1301941/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

USEF, undifferentiated sarcoma with epithelioid features; UPS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; MPM, malignant pleural mesothelioma; IHC, immunohistochemical; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; USTS, undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma; NGS, next-generation sequencing.

References

1. Choi, JH, and Ro, JY. The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue: selected changes and new entities. Adv Anat Pathol. (2021) 28:44–58. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000284

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sakharpe, A, Lahat, G, Gulamhusein, T, Liu, P, Bolshakov, S, Nguyen, T, et al. Epithelioid sarcoma and unclassified sarcoma with epithelioid features: Clinicopathological variables, molecular markers, and a new experimental model. Oncologist. (2011) 16:512–22. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0174

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Fletcher, CD, Gustafson, P, Rydholm, A, Willén, H, and Akerman, M. Clinicopathologic re-evaluation of 100 malignant fibrous histiocytomas: prognostic relevance of subclassification. J Clin Oncol. (2001) 19:3045–50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.12.3045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sbaraglia, M, Bellan, E, and Dei Tos, AP. The 2020 WHO classification of soft tissue Tumours: news and perspectives. Pathologica. (2020) 113:70–84. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-213

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Thway, K, Jones, RL, Noujaim, J, and Fisher, C. Epithelioid sarcoma: diagnostic features and genetics. Adv Anat Pathol. (2016) 23:41–9. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000102

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Chapel, DB, Schulte, JJ, Husain, AN, and Krausz, T. Application of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis and management of malignant mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res. (2020) 9:S3–S27. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.29

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Girolami, I, Lucenteforte, E, Eccher, A, Marletta, S, Brunelli, M, Graziano, P, et al. Evidence-based diagnostic performance of novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. (2022) 130:96–109. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22509

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Attanoos, RL, and Gibbs, AR. “Pseudomesotheliomatous” carcinomas of the pleura: a 10-year analysis of cases from the environmental lung disease research group, Cardiff. Histopathology. (2003) 43:444–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01674.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Matsukuma, S, Takeo, H, Kato, K, and Sato, K. Numerous osteoclast-like giant cells in metastases from lung adenocarcinoma, but absent from primary tumor. Thoracic Cancer. (2014) 5:354–7. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Halimi, M, BeheshtiRouy, S, Salehi, D, and Rasihashemi, SZ. The role of immunohistochemistry studies in distinguishing malignant mesothelioma from metastatic lung carcinoma in malignant pleural effusion. Iran J Pathol. (2019) 14:122–6. doi: 10.30699/ijp.14.2.122

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mehta, A, Bansal, D, Tripathi, R, and Jajodia, A. SMARCA4/BRG1 protein-deficient thoracic tumors dictate re-examination of small biopsy reporting in non–small cell lung cancer. J Pathol Transl Med. (2021) 55:307–16. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2021.05.11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Anžič, N, Krasniqi, F, Eberhardt, AL, Tzankov, A, and Haslbauer, JD. Ipilimumab and Pembrolizumab mixed response in a 41-year-old patient with SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma: an interdisciplinary case study. Case Reports in Oncology. (2021) 14:706–15. doi: 10.1159/000515416

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hasegawa, T, Yamamoto, S, Yokoyama, R, Umeda, T, Matsuno, Y, and Hirohashi, S. Prognostic significance of grading and staging systems using MIB-1 score in adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk. Cancer. (2002) 95:843–51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10728

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Tanaka, K, Hasegawa, T, Nojima, T, Oda, Y, Mizusawa, J, Fukuda, H, et al. Prospective evaluation of Ki-67 system in histological grading of soft tissue sarcomas in the Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0304. World J Surg Oncol. (2016) 14:110. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0869-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nystrom, LM, Reimer, NB, Reith, JD, Dang, L, Zlotecki, RA, Scarborough, MT, et al. Multidisciplinary Management of Soft Tissue Sarcoma. ScientificWorldJournal. (2013) 2013:852462:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2013/852462

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sampath, S, Schultheiss, TE, Hitchcock, YJ, Randall, RL, Shrieve, DC, and Wong, JYC. Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma: multi-institutional analysis of 821 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2011) 81:498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. O’Sullivan, B, Davis, AM, Turcotte, R, Bell, R, Catton, C, Chabot, P, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial. Lancet. (2002) 359:2235–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09292-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Goy, BW, Syed, S, Padmanabhan, A, Burchette, RJ, and Helmstedter, CS. The role of Ifosfamide–doxorubicin chemotherapy in histology-specific, high grade, locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma, a 14-year experience. Radiother Oncol. (2021) 165:174–8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Novetsky, AP, and Powell, MA. Management of sarcomas of the uterus. Curr Opin Oncol. (2013) 25:546–52. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328363e0ef

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chi, Y, Fang, Z, Hong, X, Yao, Y, Sun, P, Wang, G, et al. Safety and efficacy of Anlotinib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with refractory metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. (2018) 24:5233–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3766

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. de Bruin, EC, Cowell, C, Warne, PH, Jiang, M, Saunders, RE, Melnick, MA, et al. Reduced NF1 expression confers resistance to EGFR inhibition in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. (2014) 4:606–19. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0741

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Nissan, MH, Pratilas, CA, Jones, AM, Ramirez, R, Won, H, Liu, C, et al. Loss of NF1 in cutaneous melanoma is associated with RAS activation and MEK dependence. Cancer Res. (2014) 74:2340–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2625

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Giacomelli, AO, Yang, X, Lintner, RE, McFarland, JM, Duby, M, Kim, J, et al. Mutational processes shape the landscape of TP53 mutations in human cancer. Nat Genet. (2018) 50:1381–7. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0204-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Leijen, S, van Geel, RMJM, Pavlick, AC, Tibes, R, Rosen, L, Razak, ARA, et al. Phase I study evaluating WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. (2016) 34:4371–80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.5991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Leijen, S, van Geel, R, Sonke, GS, de Jong, D, Rosenberg, EH, Marchetti, S, et al. Phase II study with Wee1 inhibitor AZD1775 plus carboplatin in patients with p53 mutated ovarian cancer refractory or resistant (<3 months) to standard first line therapy. JCO. (2015) 33:2507–7. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2507

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. AstraZeneca. A Phase Ib Study of AZD1775 and Olaparib in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumours [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; (2019) [cited 2023 Jan 1]. Report No.: NCT02511795. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02511795

Google Scholar

27. von Mehren, M, Kane, JM, Bui, MM, Choy, E, Connelly, M, Dry, S, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: soft tissue sarcoma, version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. (2020) 18:1604–12. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0058

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Marcus, L, Fashoyin-Aje, LA, Donoghue, M, Yuan, M, Rodriguez, L, Gallagher, PS, et al. FDA approval summary: Pembrolizumab for the treatment of tumor mutational burden-high solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. (2021) 27:4685–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0327

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Marabelle, A, Le, DT, Ascierto, PA, Di Giacomo, AM, De Jesus-Acosta, A, Delord, JP, et al. Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in patients with noncolorectal high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient Cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. (2020) 38:1–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yu, J, Ling, S, Hong, J, Zhang, L, Zhou, W, Yin, L, et al. TP53/mTORC1-mediated bidirectional regulation of PD-L1 modulates immune evasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. (2023) 11:e007479. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007479

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Dong, ZY, Zhong, WZ, Zhang, XC, Su, J, Xie, Z, Liu, SY, et al. Potential predictive value of TP53 and KRAS mutation status for response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. (2017) 23:3012–24. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2554

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Frost, N, Kollmeier, J, Vollbrecht, C, Grah, C, Matthes, B, Pultermann, D, et al. KRASG12C/TP53 co-mutations identify long-term responders to first line palliative treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 high (≥50%) lung adenocarcinoma. Transl Lung Cancer Res. (2021) 10:737–52. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-958

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Lang, Y, Li, X, Chen, S, Xiang, P, and Han, A. The clinicopathological features of epithelioid undifferentiated sarcoma with TFE3 amplification with one case report. Arch Clin Med Case Rep. (2021) 5:129–36.

Google Scholar

34. Li, ZX, Zheng, S, Jiang, HH, Sun, YZ, Qi, RQ, Hong, YX, et al. A 10-year-old girl with metastatic unclassified sarcoma with epithelioid features. Chin Med J (Engl). (2017) 130:1385–6. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.206351

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. El Ochi, MR, el Hammoumi, M, Biyi, A, Allaoui, M, Kabiri, EH, Albouzidi, A, et al. Pulmonary tumor diagnosed as an undifferentiated sarcoma with epithelioid features: a case report. J. Med. Case Rep. (2016) 10.

Google Scholar

36. Sajko, N, Murphy, S, and Tran, A. Undifferentiated epithelioid sarcoma presenting as a fever of unknown origin: a case report. J. Med. Case Rep. (2019) 13:24. doi: 10.1186/s13256-019-1927-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zhang, T, Lu, Y, Liu, X, Zhao, M, He, J, Liu, X, et al. Comprehensive analysis of TP53 mutation characteristics and identification of patients with inferior prognosis and enhanced immune escape in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am. J. Hematol. (2022) 97:E14–7. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26323

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Chu, C, Liu, D, Wang, D, Hu, S, and Zhang, Y. Identification and development of TP53 mutation-associated long non-coding RNAs signature for optimized prognosis assessment and treatment selection in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. (2023) 37:03946320231211795. doi: 10.1177/03946320231211795

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lu, Q, Wei, L, Cai, S, Zhang, Z, and Zhang, L. Detection of TP53 gene mutation in blood of breast cancer patients based on circulating tumor DNA and its application in prognosis. Cellular and Molecular Biology. (2023) 69:200–6. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2023.69.11.34

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar