Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Med., 25 October 2023
Sec. Nuclear Medicine
This article is part of the Research Topic Global Excellence in Nuclear Medicine: North America View all 5 articles

Editorial: Global excellence in nuclear medicine: North America

  • 1Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
  • 2Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

In this editorial, the significance of global cooperation in promoting scientific knowledge, particularly in the field of Nuclear Medicine, is discussed. Frontiers in Medicine has arranged a special edition that features the work of distinguished researchers from North America and showcases their recent innovations in Nuclear Medicine.

Effective communication of findings is a critical aspect of scientific progress, especially when it comes to patient care. The imaging report plays a vital role in this communication process. In their review, Murad et al. highlighted the need for standardized classification schemes and reporting guidelines for PET/CT scans using 18F-FDG, 68Ga-DOTA-peptides, and PSMA-based radiopharmaceuticals in oncology. These schemes ensure that imaging reports are clear, concise, and evidence-based, which makes clinical decision-making easier. The paper discusses various classification schemes for interpreting and reporting PET imaging for lymphoma, multiple myeloma, melanoma, head and neck cancers, prostate cancer, and neuroendocrine tumors. The review also mentions the novel PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT). However, the authors caution that the implementation of these recently proposed interpretation schemes to new indications would require validation in further prospective studies before they can be integrated into routine clinical practice.

Two articles in this series analyze the issue of diagnostic radiopharmaceutical extravasations during nuclear medicine procedures (Osborne et al.; Crowley et al.). The review article by Osborne et al. challenges the long-standing assumptions regarding diagnostic radiopharmaceutical extravasations. According to the article, significant extravasations can harm patients and irradiate tissue beyond acceptable limits. The findings are based on a review of 58 peer-reviewed documents that suggest patient harm due to extravasation and evaluation of five extravasated patients who underwent repeat imaging at the authors' institutions. The study challenges the belief that diagnostic extravasations do not cause harm and emphasizes the need for monitoring and dosimetry of extravasated tissue in some cases. The study also recommends process improvements to reduce the frequency of extravasations in nuclear medicine procedures. This is important because quantification is essential in precision medicine, and we need to follow ALARA principles. The case report by Crowley et al. highlights the importance of detecting the excess presence of the radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-MDP near the injection site during nuclear medicine procedures. Detecting extravasations or venous stasis early in the injection process is crucial for ensuring good quality of images and minimizing radiation dose to surrounding tissue. This case emphasizes the need for proactive measures to mitigate potential issues during radiopharmaceutical administration. Early detection of the excess presence of 99mTc-MDP near the injection site enables technologists to apply mitigation tactics early in the process. Detecting extravasation or stasis early in the injection process can be necessary for image interpretation and minimizing radiation dose to tissue.

Kim et al. conducted a study to evaluate cerebrovascular malformations with the help of PET/MRI scan and a radiotracer flutriciclamide ([18F]GE-180). The study aimed to examine the role of neuroinflammation in cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM), investigate the uptake of flutriciclamide in different brain regions in CCM patients (n = 5) and controls (n = 6), and compare the uptake with iron deposition assessed by quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). The study concluded that the uptake of flutriciclamide in CCM lesions is positively correlated with QSM. Therefore, flutriciclamide can be used as a potential marker for neuroinflammation in CCM patients. Flutriciclamide uptake combined with QSM offers complementary information for lesion delineation. It highlights the benefits of hybrid modalities like PET/MRI that can not only locate CCM lesions but also quantify both neuroinflammation and iron deposition simultaneously.

Collaboration on a global scale is critical for advancing scientific knowledge, particularly in the field of nuclear medicine. International researchers play a vital role in contributing to this field. Effective communication in patient care relies on standardized reporting guidelines. The literature continues to feature publications that demonstrate these ongoing efforts (13). Detecting and addressing extravasations during procedures is essential to prevent harm to patients and exceeding radiation limits. Radiopharmaceutical research, such as flutriciclamide, shows promise for a better understanding of diseases like CCM, and the optimization of simultaneous PET/MRI in performing multiparametric evaluation in oncology, specifically in brain, head and neck, breast, liver, colorectal, gynecologic, prostate, and bladder tumors, particularly in the pediatric population (424). Leading societies in nuclear medicine (SNMMI and EANM) and MRI (ISMRM) have released a consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology (25), as well as recently, SNMMI, ACNM, and ASNC released a joint position statement on extravasations of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals and medical event reporting (26). They summarized that the extravasations are best managed on an institutional level and do not require any additional NRC regulation. These extravasations do not cause issues in patient-safety but rather a quality-control issue as they may affect quality of diagnostic images, especially for quantitative studies. These indicate ongoing efforts to enhance the quality and safety of Nuclear Medicine practices through research and collaboration.

Author contributions

AJ: Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. AC: Writing—review and editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Author disclaimer

This work was done as part of the AJ's official duties as an NIH employee and is a Work of the United States Government.

References

1. Tian M, Civelek AC, Carrio I, Watanabe Y, Kang KW, Murakami K, et al. International consensus on the use of tau PET imaging agent 18F-flortaucipir in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2022) 49:895–904. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05673-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Tian M, Zuo C, Civelek AC, Carrio I, Watanabe Y, Kang KW, et al. International nuclear medicine consensus on the clinical use of amyloid positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease. Phenomics. (2022) 26:375–89. doi: 10.1007/s43657-022-00068-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Tian M, Watanabe Y, Kang KW, Murakami K, Chiti A, Carrio I, et al. International consensus on the use of [18F]-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients affected by epilepsy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2021) 48:3827–34. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05524-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Quick HH. Integrated PET/MR. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2014) 39:243–58. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24523

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Law I, Albert NL, Arbizu J, Boellaard R, Drzezga A, Galldiks N, et al. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radio labelled amino acids and [(18)F]FDG: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2019) 46:540–57. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4207-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hirsch FW, Sattler B, Sorge I, Kurch L, Viehweger A, Ritter L, et al. PET/MR in children. Initial clinical experience in paediatric oncology using an integrated PET/MR scanner. Pediatr Radiol. (2013) 43:860–75. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2570-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jena A, Taneja S, Jha A, Damesha NK, Negi P, Jadhav GK, et al. Multiparametric evaluation in differentiating glioma recurrence from treatment-induced necrosis using simultaneous (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI: a single-institution retrospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2017) 38:899–907. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Marner L, Nysom K, Sehested A, Borgwardt L, Mathiasen R, Henriksen OM, et al. Early postoperative (18)F-FET PET/MRI for pediatric brain and spinal cord tumors. J Nucl Med. (2019) 60:1053–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.220293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ladefoged CN, Marner L, Hindsholm A, Law I, Hojgaard L, Andersen FL. Deep learning based attenuation correction of PET/MRI in pediatric brain tumor patients: evaluation in a clinical setting. Front Neurosci. (2018) 12:1005. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.01005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Reiner CS, Stolzmann P, Husmann L, Burger IA, Hullner MW, Schaefer NG, et al. Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2014) 41:649–58. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2654-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chan SC, Yeh CH, Yen TC, Ng SH, Chang JT, Lin CY, et al. Clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/MRI as a single-step imaging modality in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2018) 45:1297–308. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3986-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Varoquaux A, Rager O, Poncet A, Delattre BM, Ratib O, Becker CD, et al. Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: (18)F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2014) 41:462–75. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2580-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L, Senkus E, Aapro M, Andre F, et al. ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2). Breast. (2014) 23:489–502. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Taneja S, Jena A, Goel R, Sarin R, Kaul S. Simultaneous whole-body F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol. (2014) 83:2231–39 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hope TA, Pampaloni MH, Nakakura E, VanBrocklin H, Slater J, Jivan S, et al. Simultaneous (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/MRI with gadoxetate disodium in patients with neuroendocrine tumor. Abdom Imaging. (2015) 40:1432–40. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0409-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hong SB, Choi SH, Kim KW, Park SH, Kim SY, Lee SJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG-PET/MRI for liver metastasis in patients with primary malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. (2019) 29:3553–63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5909-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Beiderwellen K, Grueneisen J, Ruhlmann V, Buderath P, Aktas B, Heusch P, et al. [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent malignancies of the female pelvis: initial results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2015) 42:56–65. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2902-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt BM, Heubner M, Aktas B, Kinner S, Forsting M, et al. Integrated PET/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2015) 42:1814–24. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3131-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Queiroz MA, Kubik-Huch RA, Hauser N, Freiwald-Chilla B, von Schulthess G, Froehlich JM, et al. PET/MRI and PET/CT in advanced gynaecological tumours: initial experience and comparison. Eur Radiol. (2015) 25:2222–30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3657-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Burns R, Mule S, Blanc-Durand P, Tofighi M, Belhadj K, Zerbib P, et al. Optimization of whole-body 2-[(18)F]FDG-PET/MRI imaging protocol for the initial staging of patients with myeloma. Eur Radiol. (2022) 32:3085–96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08388-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ferraro DA, Becker AS, Kranzbuhler B, Mebert I, Baltensperger A, Zeimpekis KG, et al. Diagnostic performance of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI-guided biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer: a prospective single-center study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2021) 48:3315–24. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05261-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Freitag MT, Radtke JP, Afshar-Oromieh A, Roethke MC, Hadaschik BA, Gleave M, et al. Local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy is at risk to be missed in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET of PET/CT and PET/MRI: comparison with mpMRI integrated in simultaneous PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2017) 44:776–87. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3594-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Jambor I, Kuisma A, Kahkonen E, Kemppainen J, Merisaari H, Eskola O, et al. Prospective evaluation of (18)F-FACBC PET/CT and PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients (FLUCIPRO trial). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2018) 45:355–64. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3875-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Civelek AC, Niglio SA, Malayeri AA, Lin J, Gurram S, Chalfin HJ, et al. Clinical value of 18FDG PET/MRI in muscle-invasive, locally advanced, and metastatic bladder cancer. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. (2021) 39:787. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Veit-Haibach P, Ahlström H, Boellaard R, Delgado Bolton RC, Hesse S, Hope T, et al. International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2023) 25:6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06406-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Packard AB, Buehner TM, Yang L, Dorbala S. SNMMI-ACNM-ASNC Joint Position Statement on Extravasations and Medical Event Reporting. http://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-snmmi/files/production/public/SNMMI%20statement_final%20signed%20w%20letterhead%209-29-20.pdf (accessed October 4, 2023).

Google Scholar

Keywords: collaboration, flutriciclamide, [18F]GE-180 PET, PET, PET/CT, PET/MRI, quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), nuclear medical imaging

Citation: Jha A and Civelek AC (2023) Editorial: Global excellence in nuclear medicine: North America. Front. Med. 10:1300179. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1300179

Received: 23 September 2023; Accepted: 28 September 2023;
Published: 25 October 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Giorgio Treglia, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Switzerland

Copyright © 2023 Jha and Civelek. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Abhishek Jha, mailabhishekjha@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.