Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Med., 12 May 2023
Sec. Pulmonary Medicine
This article is part of the Research Topic Diagnosis and Treatment of Sarcoidosis View all 12 articles

Differential diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis: a review

Dominique Valeyre,Dominique Valeyre1,2Michel BraunerMichel Brauner3Jean-Franois Bernaudin,Jean-François Bernaudin2,4Etienne CarbonnelleEtienne Carbonnelle5Boris Duchemann,Boris Duchemann2,6Ccile Rotenberg,Cécile Rotenberg2,7Ingrid BergerIngrid Berger1Antoine MartinAntoine Martin8Hilario Nunes,Hilario Nunes2,7Jean-Marc NaccacheJean-Marc Naccache1Florence Jeny,
Florence Jeny2,7*
  • 1Pulmonology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France
  • 2INSERM UMR 1272, Sorbonne University Paris-Nord, Paris, France
  • 3Radiology Department, Avicenne University Hospital, Bobigny, France
  • 4Faculté de Médecine, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
  • 5Microbiology Department, Avicenne University Hospital, Bobigny, France
  • 6Thoracic and Oncology Department, Avicenne University Hospital, Bobigny, France
  • 7Pulmonology Department, Avicenne University Hospital, Bobigny, France
  • 8Pathology Department, Avicenne University Hospital, Bobigny, France

Diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis raises challenges due to both the absence of a specific diagnostic criterion and the varied presentations capable of mimicking many other conditions. The aim of this review is to help non-sarcoidosis experts establish optimal differential-diagnosis strategies tailored to each situation. Alternative granulomatous diseases that must be ruled out include infections (notably tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and histoplasmosis), chronic beryllium disease, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, granulomatous talcosis, drug-induced granulomatosis (notably due to TNF-a antagonists, immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and interferons), immune deficiencies, genetic disorders (Blau syndrome), Crohn’s disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and malignancy-associated granulomatosis. Ruling out lymphoproliferative disorders may also be very challenging before obtaining typical biopsy specimen. The first step is an assessment of epidemiological factors, notably the incidence of sarcoidosis and of alternative diagnoses; exposure to risk factors (e.g., infectious, occupational, and environmental agents); and exposure to drugs taken for therapeutic or recreational purposes. The clinical history, physical examination and, above all, chest computed tomography indicate which differential diagnoses are most likely, thereby guiding the choice of subsequent investigations (e.g., microbiological investigations, lymphocyte proliferation tests with metals, autoantibody assays, and genetic tests). The goal is to rule out all diagnoses other than sarcoidosis that are consistent with the clinical situation. Chest computed tomography findings, from common to rare and from typical to atypical, are described for sarcoidosis and the alternatives. The pathology of granulomas and associated lesions is discussed and diagnostically helpful stains specified. In some patients, the definite diagnosis may require the continuous gathering of information during follow-up. Diseases that often closely mimic sarcoidosis include chronic beryllium disease and drug-induced granulomatosis. Tuberculosis rarely resembles sarcoidosis but is a leading differential diagnosis in regions of high tuberculosis endemicity.

How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (Sherlock Holmes, The Sign of Four, 1890).

1. Introduction

Sarcoidosis is challenging to diagnose given the broad range of presentations, many of which mimic other conditions (1). No single criterion providing a definite diagnosis of sarcoidosis with 100% accuracy is available. Current guidelines indicate that the diagnosis of sarcoidosis should rely on three criteria, two positive (compatible presentation and evidence of noncaseating granulomas) and one negative (exclusion of all alternative diagnoses whose presentation and/or histopathology are similar) (1, 2). However, not all patients who meet these three criteria have sarcoidosis. The easiest criterion to assess is probably the presence of noncaseating granulomas, which can be sampled using highly efficient tools such as endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, transbronchial lung and bronchial biopsy, and biopsy of peripheral lesions (e.g., involving the skin or peripheral lymph nodes) (3). In contrast, assessing compatibility of the presentation and ruling out alternative diagnoses can be laborious. These two criteria must be evaluated concomitantly, since the presentation governs the likelihood of each alternative diagnosis. Determining whether the presentation is compatible with sarcoidosis relies heavily on expertise in the field of sarcoidosis. However, the diverse and nonspecific initial manifestations of sarcoidosis often lead patients to visit general practitioners or emergency physicians, who have limited experience with the disease. This point probably explains the often long diagnostic delays, which may exceed 6 months, and the need for several physician visits before the diagnosis is established (4).

Several recent articles provide useful information for diagnosing sarcoidosis. Development of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) diagnostic guidelines involved using a Delphi methodology to classify several manifestations as indicating a highly probable or probable diagnosis of sarcoidosis, based on the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatosis (WASOG) Sarcoidosis Organ Assessment Instrument (1, 5). Moreover, two Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Scores, with and without biopsy data, respectively, have been validated in confirmation cohorts, in the USA (6) and in a multicontinental study (7). The main strength of these studies is assessment of the scores under real-life conditions, with both sarcoidosis and a panel of alternative diseases mimicking sarcoidosis, to address both presentation compatibility and differential diagnoses.

This review focuses on the differential diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis. Our aim was to provide practical diagnostic help to physicians who have limited experience with sarcoidosis. The first section presents useful diagnostic tools (epidemiology, clinical presentation, thoracic imaging, pathology, and microbiology) and provides examples of imaging and pathology findings. In the second section, we describe specific settings in which alternative diagnoses must be considered and discuss the best tools for differentiating these diagnoses from sarcoidosis.

2. Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search for publications relevant to the differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis. To this end, we searched PubMed using the terms “sarcoidosis” OR “pulmonary granulomatosis” OR “tuberculosis” OR “histoplasmosis AND “epidemiology” OR “thoracic imaging” OR pathology” OR “microbiology” OR “occupational-induced” OR “environmental-induced” OR “drug-induced” OR “immunodeficiency” OR “genetic” OR “vasculitis” OR “Crohn’s disease.” We considered original articles and reviews published in English between January 2010 and January 2023, as well as other articles that did not meet these criteria but were of specific interest.

3. Results

3.1. How can epidemiology, clinical presentation and imaging, pathology, and microbiology studies help differentiate sarcoidosis from alternative diseases?

Table 1 lists the pulmonary granulomatous diseases to consider in the differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis, categorized according to their cause or mechanism. The table does not include granulomatous diseases that do not involve the lungs, such as cat scratch disease.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Differential diagnoses of pulmonary granulomatous diseases that must be ruled out before diagnosing sarcoidosis.

3.1.1. Ratio of incidences of sarcoidosis over alternative diagnoses according to the epidemiological setting

The ratio of the incidence of sarcoidosis over the incidence of each alternative diagnosis varies significantly across geographic areas and across sub-populations in a given area. These variations dramatically impact the probabilities of different diagnoses, according to Bayes’ theorem. A comparison of the incidences of sarcoidosis and tuberculosis illustrates this point. In some countries, tuberculosis is the main differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis (8, 9). Sweden has a high incidence of sarcoidosis (11.5/100,000/y) (10) and a very low incidence of tuberculosis (3.6/100,000/y), Italy a low incidence of sarcoidosis (1.2–3/100,000/y) and higher incidence of tuberculosis (6.6/100,000/y), and Russia a low incidence of sarcoidosis (1.1–3.8/100,000/y) and high incidence of tuberculosis (46/100,000/y). The probability that a patient will have sarcoidosis rather than tuberculosis therefore varies widely across these three countries, the incidence ratios being 3.2 in Sweden, 0.18 in Italy, and 0.02 in Russia; the value in Russia is 160 times smaller than that in Sweden. In some countries, both diseases are very common: in India, the prevalence of sarcoidosis is 61.2–150/100,000 (incidence unknown) and the incidence of tuberculosis is 188/100,000/y. As discussed below, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is considerably more difficult in regions where tuberculosis is endemic. Moreover, in a given area, significant epidemiological differences may exist across ethnic groups, as shown by a study done in a Paris suburb, where the odds ratio for having sarcoidosis was 2.97 in black people from the Caribbean or subsaharian Africa, with European Caucasians as the reference (11). Similarly, in high-income countries, tuberculosis is far more common in migrants from low-income countries than in locals.

Contrary to tuberculosis, pulmonary histoplasmosis is not ubiquitous but instead occurs in well-delineated areas such as the Ohio River and Mississippi River valleys in the USA and specific regions of Central and South America, Africa, Asia, and Australia. This disease is very rare in Europe, with the exception of Italy (12). Patients must be asked about travel to endemic areas. In the USA, nontuberculous mycobacterial infections are more common than tuberculosis and must be included in the differential diagnosis (13). In a biopsy study comparing the causes of pulmonary granulomatosis in the USA and in other countries (Austria, Brazil, India, Japan, Scotland, and Turkey), pulmonary histoplasmosis was demonstrated in 18 patients in the USA vs. none in the other countries, whereas tuberculosis was found in a single patient in the USA vs. 18 in the other countries (14). Thus, region-specific epidemiological factors weigh heavily on the differential diagnosis.

Chronic beryllium disease and other occupational mineral-induced granulomatous diseases, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and drug-induced granulomatosis occur in specific settings. Blau syndrome, which very rarely involves the lungs, is usually diagnosed at a younger age compared to pediatric sarcoidosis (15).

3.1.2. Clinical presentation

Symptoms and signs, particularly those observed in extra-pulmonary manifestations which may be observed in up to 50% of sarcoidosis patients, may be useful to differentiate sarcoidosis from alternative diseases. For example, some manifestations were classified supportive of sarcoidosis diagnosis with a high probability (erythema nodosum, lupus pernio or uveitis) or with probability (seven cranial nerve paralysis) according to official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guidelines (1) Recently, a Sarcoidosis Diagnosis Score Clinical could be validated in a large multicontinental sarcoidosis population compared to controls with multiple other diseases made possible to assess the probability of sarcoidosis diagnosis before obtaining typical granulomas on biopsy specimens (7).

3.1.3. Thoracic imaging

The likelihood of specific findings (e.g., lymphadenopathy, lung infiltration with or without fibrosis, nodules, pulmonary hypertension) differs between sarcoidosis and the alternative diagnoses.

3.1.3.1. Hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy

Figures 1AI shows representative features of lymphadenopathy by chest computed tomography (CT), from the most typical to the most atypical, in sarcoidosis and in the alternative diagnoses.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Representative features of lymphadenopathy. (A) Enhanced chest CT (mediastinal window): Sarcoidosis with typical, symmetric, hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy that does not compress the adjacent pulmonary vessels, (B) Chest CT (pulmonary window): Sarcoidosis with a rare and atypical lymphadenopathy pattern combining unilateral hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy, thickened fissures, diffuse ground-glass opacities, and sparse parenchymal micronodules. (C) Enhanced chest CT (mediastinal window): Tuberculosis with unilateral hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy exhibiting central necrosis. (D) Chest radiography: Hodgkin’s disease with voluminous, left, anterosuperior, mediastinal lymphadenopathy. (E) Enhanced chest CT (pulmonary window): Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced sarcoid-like reaction: bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy with blurred contours extending as ground-glass opacities into the posterior lung parenchyma. (F) Chest CT (mediastinal window): Sarcoidosis: mediastinal lymphadenopathy with eggshell calcifications. (G) Chest CT (mediastinal window): Silicosis: asymmetric, calcified, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, with eggshell calcification of some nodes; calcified mass in the right upper lung lobe and small, scattered calcifications in the left lung. (H) Chest CT (mediastinal window): Tuberculosis: completely calcified unilateral hilar lymph node. (I) Chest CT (mediastinal window): Amyloidosis: small, bilateral, calcified, mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

3.1.3.1.1. Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy with or without mediastinal lymphadenopathy

In 70% of patients with sarcoidosis, chest radiographs show typical lymphadenopathy, with or without pulmonary infiltrates. Parenchymal disease is evident in only 45% of patients at the time of maximal lymphadenopathy. In patients without parenchymal infiltrates, the lymphadenopathy is hilar and bilateral (98%). In a study of 62 patients, the most common mediastinal locations were the aortopulmonary (76%) and right paratracheal (71%) regions and the most common combination was bilateral hilar, right paratracheal, and aortopulmonary (37%) (16). Symmetrical hilar lymphadenopathy is a characteristic finding (Figure 1A) and can help distinguish sarcoidosis from other conditions responsible for hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy (17). Typically, sarcoid lymphadenopathy does not compress the adjacent airways and vessels.

Other conditions whose features can include symmetrical bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy are chronic beryllium disease (cf infra) in which the node enlargement is usually moderate, and drug-induced granulomatosis (18, 19) (Figure 1E).

By contrast, symmetrical bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy was a presentation feature in only 3.8% of lymphomas, 0.8% of bronchogenic carcinomas, and 0.2% of extrathoracic carcinomas (20). In granulomatosis-associated common variable immunodeficiency, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy indistinguishable from sarcoidosis was seen in only 10% of patients (21).

In IgG4-related disease, the chest CT presentation very rarely suggests sarcoidosis, with lymphadenopathy, peribronchovascular thickening, and nodules. The risk of confusion is greatest in patients who have symmetrical swelling of the lacrimal, parotid, and submandibular glands. However, findings of auto-immune pancreatitis, bilateral orbital pseudo-tumor, and retroperitoneal fibrosis with no granulomas but typical features of IgG4-related disease upon histological examination provide the correct diagnosis (22, 23).

3.1.3.1.2. Unilateral or asymmetrical hilar lymphadenopathy, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy without hilar lymphadenopathy

Asymmetric or unilateral hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy occurs in less than 5% of patients with sarcoidosis overall (24) but is more common after 50 years of age (Figure 1B) (24).

Unilateral hilar lymphadenopathy is more often seen in tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, lymphoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, and metastatic carcinoma than in sarcoidosis (25).

Tuberculosis must be considered routinely (26). Features that strongly suggest active tuberculosis include unilateral hilar/paratracheal lymphadenopathy (Figure 1C), mediastinal lymphadenopathy with peripheral rim enhancement (due to central necrosis) or heterogeneous enhancement (Figure 1C), and lymph-node conglomeration or obscuration of perinodal fat with or without ipsilateral parenchymal lesions.

In the acute form of pulmonary histoplasmosis in immunocompetent patients, lymphadenopathy may be present (20% of patients), and small nodules (<3 mm) are usually seen (80% of patients) (27).

Large lymphadenopathy in the anterosuperior mediastinum suggests lymphoma (Figure 1D) (20).

3.1.3.1.3. Calcified lymph nodes

Eggshell calcifications can be seen in sarcoidosis (Figure 1F), some fungal infections, and amyloidosis but are more common in silicosis (Figure 1G) and coal miner’s pneumoconiosis (28). In a retrospective CT study, nodal calcifications were present in 53% of 49 patients with sarcoidosis and 46% of 28 patients with tuberculosis (29). Focal calcification was more common in sarcoidosis (58%) than in tuberculosis (23%), whereas the opposite was true for complete calcification (62 and 27%, respectively) (Figure 1H). When the nodes were calcified, involvement was far more often bilateral in sarcoidosis than in tuberculosis (65 and 8%, respectively) (Figures 1F,H) (29). In patients with systemic amyloidosis, lymphadenopathy was the single most common abnormality (75%) and contained punctate calcifications in 33% of cases (Figure 1I).

3.1.3.2. Lung involvement
3.1.3.2.1. Micronodular parenchymal pattern

Figures 2AH illustrates this pattern.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Representative of micronodular parenchymal pattern (A-H) and nodular pattern (I-L) in chest CT (parenchymal window). (A) Sarcoidosis with typical diffuse micronodules aggregated in small clusters and predominating along the fissures (lymphatic distribution). (B) Sarcoidosis: less typical presentation with profuse micronodules whose distribution is more difficult to determine; nevertheless, the predominance of micronodules along the fissures is suggestive of lymphatic distribution. (C) Bronchogenic tuberculosis with micronodules in a unilateral and centrilobular distribution that spares the pleural surface. (D) Typical, hematogenous, miliary tuberculosis with minute micronodules that are all the same size and are distributed uniformly (i.e., at random) throughout both lungs. (E) Hypersensitivity pneumonitis with profuse, minute, diffuse micronodules in a centrilobular distribution that spares the subpleural parenchyma, leaving a 2–3 cm uninvolved border. (F) Neoplastic miliary: the distribution is not symmetrical and the nodules are larger and more irregular than in miliary tuberculosis. (G) Systemic amyloidosis with diffuse pulmonary involvement and no lymphadenopathy; the micronodules are diffuse with no particular distribution and are combined with several irregular lines and thickened interlobular septa. (H) Lymphangitis carcinomatosa: thickened peribronchovascular interstitium, nodules, and nodular septal reticulations without distortion. (I) Pulmonary sarcoidosis: multiple nodules with irregular and well-defined contours. (J) Pulmonary metastases from renal carcinoma: sharply contoured nodules in a more peripheral distribution. (K) Granulomatosis-associated common variable immunodeficiency: nodules, some of which exhibit the halo sign. (L) Chronic histoplasmosis: sparse pulmonary nodules.

The typical radiographic manifestation of parenchymal lung involvement by sarcoidosis consists in diffuse micronodules predominating in the upper and middle parts of the lungs (16).

By chest CT, perilymphatic micronodules are the most common abnormality in pulmonary sarcoidosis (77% of cases) (30). These opacities predominate in the upper and middle lungs (68%). Clusters of micronodules and nodules are often visible around the peripheral bronchovascular bundles (Figure 2A) (30). The micronodules may be so profuse as to make their distribution difficult to assess. However, micronodule predominance along the fissures suggests a perilymphatic distribution (Figure 2B). At the level of the secondary pulmonary lobules, the interlobular septa are thickened or nodular and the centrilobular interstitium is thickened (31). In a study of pulmonary sarcoidosis, 15 of the 25 patients had nodular lesions 1 to 5 mm in diameter (32). These nodules predominated along the bronchovascular bundles in 17 patients and, to a lesser extent, in the subpleural regions in 19 patients and along the interlobular septa, with a beaded appearance. Thickening of the interlobular septa was seen in 10 patients. The nodule contours were irregular in 17 patients.

A limited number of sarcoidosis-like granulomatous diseases can closely mimic sarcoidosis, including chronic beryllium disease and drug-induced granulomatous diseases (19, 33). In 28 patients with chronic beryllium disease, the chest CT findings were similar to those reported in sarcoidosis, with nodules predominating in the peribronchovascular regions or along the interlobular septa (57%), interlobular septal thickening (50%), hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy (39%), and other findings such as ground-glass opacities (32%) (Figure 3B) (33).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Representative of gound-glass opacities (A–D) and alveolar consolidations (E–I) and masses (J–L) on chest CT (pulmonary window). (A) Pulmonary sarcoidosis with predominant, diffuse, ground-glass opacities combined with lymphatic micronodules. (B) Chronic beryllium disease: heterogeneous ground-glass opacities with bilateral hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. (C) Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: diffuse ground-glass opacities and fine reticulations sparing the subpleural lung. (D) Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: diffuse ground-glass opacities and multiple clear lobules trapped in expiration. (E) Pulmonary sarcoidosis with bilateral alveolar consolidations and lymphatic micronodules. (F) Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: bilateral peripheral consolidations with lower-density (ground-glass) centers. (G) Granulomatosis with polyangiitis: alveolar consolidation related to a pulmonary vessel. (H) Lepidic-growth carcinoma: pneumonic form with a unilateral focus. (I) Lymphoma: bilateral alveolar consolidations with a limited number of septal reticulations and micronodules. (J) Fibrosing pulmonary sarcoidosis: typical presentation with bilateral hilar masses and bronchial distortion. (K) Sarcoidosis with bilateral masses in the posterior segments of the upper lobes and micronodules. (L) Coal miner’s pneumoconiosis: bilateral mass-like lesions in the upper lobes.

Granulomatosis induced by checkpoint-inhibitor cancer immunotherapy is becoming increasingly common due to the expanding indications for these drugs (34). The imaging features resemble those of sarcoidosis, with perilymphatic nodules predominating in the upper lungs and with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (35). The immune checkpoint inhibitor most often associated with a sarcoid-like reaction is ipilimumab. Melanoma was initially the most common underlying malignancy (34). The main other drugs that can induce sarcoid-like reactions (TNFa antagonists and biosimilars, interferons and pegylated interferons, and targeted therapies against cancer) can also produce chest CT lung abnormalities mimicking sarcoidosis.

By contrast, in tuberculosis, the most typical lesions in the event of airway dissemination are nodules, centrilobular nodules (notably tree-in-bud nodules), and clustered nodules predominating in the upper lobes, right middle lobe, lingula, and superior segment of the lower lobes (Figure 2C); and consolidation in these same regions with ipsilateral lymph node enlargement. Hematogenous dissemination produces a typical miliary pattern (Figure 2D); thick-walled cavities; cavities with surrounding consolidation, especially in the upper and middle parts of the lungs; pleural effusion; and the split pleura sign with separation of the two pleural leaflets by an effusion or empyema (26).

The most common radiographic abnormality in acute symptomatic histoplasmosis consists of multiple nodular opacities usually smaller than 3 mm in diameter, generally in a diffuse distribution (36). Pleural effusions are rare (2%).

In hypersensitivity pneumonitis, profuse, minute, diffuse micronodules in a centrilobular distribution sparing the subpleural parenchyma are frequently described (Figure 2E).

Several nongranulomatous lung diseases may mimic sarcoidosis, such as silicosis and coal miner’s pneumoconiosis, in which micronodules predominate in the upper lungs (78%), in a centrilobular and subpleural, bilateral, and symmetrical distribution, sometimes with confluence and posterior predominance (38%) (Figure 3L) (37, 38). Granulomatous talcosis is a pulmonary disease secondary to inhaled or intravenous drug abuse. Diffuse bronchiolar micronodular lesions are visible, sometimes in combination with masses containing areas of amorphous density (39).

In lymphangitis carcinomatosa, the nodules share with sarcoidosis a predominance in the peribronchovascular regions (11 of 18 cases) (40). However, nodular polygonal lines (51%) or thickened undistorted septal lines (66%), pleural fluid (60%), and unilateral predominance of small opacities (38%) strongly suggest lymphangitis carcinomatosa (Figure 2H) (40). Thus, the predominant lesions often differ from those found in sarcoidosis (41). The beaded septum sign consisting in nodular thickening of the interlobular septa is common in lymphangitis carcinomatosa and less so in sarcoidosis (42). In neoplastic miliary, the nodules are not symmetrically distributed and are larger and more irregular than in miliary tuberculosis (Figure 2F).

Pulmonary amyloidosis may produce misleading imaging-study findings such as diffuse micronodules in a predominantly perilymphatic distribution (41, 43, 44). In a retrospective study, 12 of 19 patients with proven amyloidosis had the systemic form of the disease, including six with both lymphadenopathy and diffuse parenchymal involvement and two with only the latter manifestation (44). Of the eight patients with diffuse parenchymal involvement, six had pulmonary nodules (Figure 2G), four diffuse irregular lines or interlobular septal thickening, three honeycombing, and three patchy ground-glass opacities.

3.1.3.2.2. Less typical patterns of lung infiltration in sarcoidosis

These patterns are illustrated in Figures 3, 4.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Representative of linear opacities (A,B), honeycombing (C,D) cysts and cavities (E–G) pulmonary hypertension (H,I) on chest CT [pulmonary window (A–G; I) and mediastinal window (H)]. (A) Pulmonary sarcoidosis: bilateral linear opacities extending from the hilum to the subpleural area, with distortion. (B) Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: bilateral linear opacities extending from the hilum to the subpleural area, with distortion. (C) Fibrosing pulmonary sarcoidosis: honeycombing with joined cavities predominating in the upper lobes. (D) Usual interstitial pattern in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: honeycombing with joined cavities that are located in the lower lobes in contact with the pleura and are smaller than in sarcoidosis. (E) Sarcoidosis with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: fibrotic lung lesions with cavities and an aspergilloma within a right upper-lobe cavity. (F) Granulomatosis-associated common variable immunodeficiency: thin-walled cystic air spaces, patchy areas of ground-glass opacities in both lungs, thickened peribronchovascular interstitium, and bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy. (G) Granulomatosis with polyangiitis: consolidation with a thick-walled cavity in the right upper lobe. (H) Sarcoidosis with pulmonary hypertension: compression of the right branch of the pulmonary artery by lymphadenopathy. (I) Sarcoidosis with pulmonary hypertension: septal reticulation and distortion; note that the pulmonary arteries are wider than the bronchi.

In about 10% of patients with sarcoidosis, the predominant chest CT finding consists in ground-glass opacities (Figure 3A) or alveolar consolidations (Figure 3E).

Predominant ground-glass opacities in patients without immunodepression occur chiefly in connective tissue diseases, drug-induced pneumonitis, alveolar proteinosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (Figure 3C), and smoking-related diseases. However, the main differential diagnosis with sarcoidosis is hypersensitivity pneumonitis, in which the ground-glass opacities are usually extensive or combined with other findings consisting chiefly in centrilobular micronodules with no tree-in-bud appearance nor involvement of the pleura or fissures (Figure 3D). The opacities are diffuse and symmetrically distributed. Their contours are blurred and their density usually low. Other signs of hypersensitivity pneumonitis are air trapping, the three-density pattern, and fibrosis. Foci of lobular air trapping on expiratory scans have been reported to be common (Figure 3D). Cystic cavities are visible in a minority (15%) of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Of note, although predominant ground-glass opacities are rare in sarcoidosis, a study demonstrated that the logical analysis of CT data established the diagnosis of sarcoidosis with high accuracy in patients with predominant ground-glass lesions, due to the additional presence of either lymphadenopathy in 79% of cases or fissural micronodules in 55% of cases (45).

Predominant multiple consolidations are more common in organizing pneumonia (Figure 3F), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Figure 3G), lymphoma (Figure 3I), and lepidic-growth carcinomas (Figure 3H) than in sarcoidosis. However, as with ground-glass opacities, co-existing abnormalities can help to establish the diagnosis of sarcoidosis (46).

3.1.3.2.3. Nodules

Sarcoidosis can also manifest as multiple nodules (defined as >3 mm in diameter) (Figure 2I). Alternative diagnoses include other granulomatous diseases, notably infections [e.g., tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and histoplasmosis (Figure 2L)], drug-induced granulomatosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. In granulomatosis-associated common variable immunodeficiency (Figure 2K), chest CT findings seen more often than in sarcoidosis were nodules, which were sometimes multiple, with the halo sign (30% vs. 3.5%) and smooth margins; air bronchograms; and bronchiectasis (65% vs. 23%) (21). The distribution of micronodules was perilymphatic in 42% of patients with granulomatosis-associated common variable immunodeficiency vs. 100% of patients with sarcoidosis. Nongranulomatous diseases such as metastases (Figure 2J), lymphoma, lymphoid granulomatosis, and amyloidosis should also be considered.

3.1.3.2.4. Cysts and other cavities

True primary pulmonary sarcoid cavitation, in which the walls of the cavities are formed by characteristic noncaseating lesions, has been reported in 2.2% of patients with sarcoidosis (47). However, even in patients with sarcoidosis, cavitation is more often due to necrotizing pyogenic, mycobacterial, mycotic, or parasitic infections (Figure 4E) (25).

Other interstitial lung diseases can cause cavities. Thus, thin-walled cystic air-filled spaces can develop in lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (Figure 4F) and thick-walled cavities in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Figure 4G).

3.1.3.3. Pulmonary fibrosis

Figures 3, 4 show the chest CT features of pulmonary fibrosis.

3.1.3.3.1. Progressive massive fibrosis

Progressive massive fibrosis often manifests as mass-like lesions, usually in a bilateral upper-lobe distribution, not only in sarcoidosis (Figures 3J,K) but also in silicosis dusts (Figure 3L), coal miner’s pneumoconiosis with heavy exposure to inorganic dusts, and granulomatous talcosis (48, 49). Background nodular opacities are associated with pneumoconiosis, with or without emphysematous destruction adjacent to the massive fibrosis (48).

3.1.3.3.2. Irregular septal thickening and irregular linear opacities from hilum to subpleural lung

A common chest CT finding in sarcoidosis is interlobular septal thickening, which is often irregular or associated with marked distortion of the lung structures (49). Linear opacities extending from the hilum to the lung periphery, with distortion, are also common in sarcoidosis (Figure 4A) and are much rarer in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (Figure 4B).

Several signs of fibrosis strongly suggest sarcoidosis. In a study of 27 patients with sarcoidosis, nine patients exhibited varying degrees of parenchymal distortion consistent with fibrosis (50) and in another, lobular distortion was a feature in 13 of 25 patients with sarcoidosis (32).

3.1.3.3.3. Honeycombing

Fibrosing pulmonary sarcoidosis can produce honeycomb cavities (Figure 4C). Honeycombing predominates in the upper lobes, and the cavities are usually large. In usual interstitial pneumonia, the joined cavities are smaller than in sarcoidosis and located in the lower lobes in contact with the pleura (Figure 4D).

3.1.3.4. Pulmonary hypertension

In pulmonary hypertension, signs of lobular distortion (Figure 4I), fibrosing mediastinitis, and pulmonary-artery compression by lymph nodes (Figure 4H) help to suggest sarcoidosis as the cause (51). When these signs are absent and the disease is recognized very late, it may be extremely difficult to eliminate other causes of pulmonary hypertension such as histoplasmosis or nongranulomatous diseases, notably interstitial lung disease-associated connective vascular diseases (52).

3.1.4. Pathology

A careful examination of biopsy specimens can help with the differential diagnosis, since several microscopic features differ between sarcoidosis and the alternative diseases. We highlight the most typical and most atypical findings in sarcoidosis and in most alternative diseases which are summarized in Table 2. Figure 5 illustrates several histopathological findings.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Histological patterns of granulomatous interstitial lung diseases.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Histopathological features of granulomas in various diseases. This figure illustrates several features of granulomas observed in various granulomatous diseases, either in mediastinal lymph nodes (A–C) or in pulmonary biopsies (D–O). (A–C) Sarcoidosis. (A) (X50): nonnecrotizing granulomas filling most of the node tissue; (B) (X100): Schaumann’s bodies (arrow); (C) (X100): dense fibrosis intermingled with granulomas. (D) Chronic beryllium disease: nonnecrotizing granuloma in a transbronchial biopsy (X200). (E,F) Intravenous pulmonary talcosis. (E) (X300): granuloma mimicking sarcoidosis; F (X300) birefringent talc particles visible under polarized light. (G–J) Tuberculosis. (G) (X50): low-magnification view showing the perivascular distribution of granulomas in miliary tuberculosis; (H) (X50): large nodule composed of caseating necrosis (arrow); (I) (X300): granuloma with a limited focus of necrosis (arrow); (J) (X950): Ziehl-Neelsen stain showing tuberculous mycobacteria (arrow). (K,L) Histoplasmosis. (K) (X300): granuloma with a central necrotic focus (arrow); (L) (X500): Grocott stain showing numerous yeast forms of Histoplasma capsulatum. (M,N) Whipple’s disease. (M) (X300): granuloma with foamy histiocytes; (N) (X500): periodic-acid Schiff-positive inclusions within the foamy histiocytes. (O) Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA): low-magnification view (X50) showing geographic basophilic necrosis suggestive of GPA when observed within a granulomatous pneumonitis.

3.1.4.1. Pathological features of pulmonary sarcoidosis

Pulmonary sarcoidosis is defined as a systemic disease manifesting chiefly as granulomatous interstitial pneumonia. Consequently, the identification of characteristic noncaseating epithelioid granulomas is essential to the diagnosis.

In sarcoidosis, the epithelioid-cell granulomas are well-formed structures whose compact core is composed of macrophages and macrophage-derived cells (epithelioid and giant cells), closely associated with CD4+ T lymphocytes. The peripheral component contains CD8 lymphocytes, CD4+ FOXP3 + Treg cells, Th17 cells, B lymphocytes, and IgA-producing plasma cells (53–55) (Figure 5A). A feature that is common but not specific of sarcoidosis is the presence of cytoplasmic inclusions, chiefly within multinucleate giant cells. These inclusions may be Schaumann bodies (conchoidal bodies) made of iron and calcium salts (Figure 5B), crystalline bodies composed of calcium oxalate and carbonate, and/or asteroid bodies made of cholesterol (Table 2). Focal coagulative necrosis is occasionally seen in the center of the granulomas. Importantly, sarcoid granulomas are particularly florid and tend to coalesce. They are observed in 54–90% of bronchial mucosal biopsies, whose number strongly affects the diagnostic yield (56). The bronchi may be more severely affected, and classic endobronchial sarcoidosis is characterized by waxy, yellow, nonuniform, mucosal nodules 2 to 4 mm in diameter that are more profuse in the lobar and segmental bronchi and mimic a malignant mass (57, 58). A key feature of sarcoidosis is the presence in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes of variously sized, noncaseating, epithelioid granulomas (Figure 5A). At the early phase, small epithelioid-cell nodules develop in the cortex. Subsequently, well-demarcated granulomas are visible throughout the lymph node and may coalesce. At the late phase, fibrosis and hyalinization develop (Figure 5C) (53). Needle aspiration of intrathoracic lymph nodes under ultrasonographic guidance, either from the airways (transbronchial needle aspiration) or from the esophagus (transesophageal needle aspiration), is now the method of choice for mediastinal-node sampling in patients with presumed stage 1 or 2 sarcoidosis (59, 60). In the lung, collections of granulomas may produce macroscopically visible but small white nodules (micronodules) or large masses (macronodules), with relative sparing of the intervening lung. The nodules predominate along the lymphatics (collecting lymphatics in the pleural interstitium, interlobular septa, bronchovascular interstitium, and intralobular lymphatics). This topographic distribution is a very strong argument for pulmonary sarcoidosis. It suggests a critical role for lymphatics in nodule development and, consequently, supports the involvement of airborne particles in the pathogenesis of pulmonary sarcoidosis. In addition, given the presence of granulomas near the small airways, peribronchiolitis with bronchiole-lumen narrowing is common. Furthermore, the blood vessels are often involved in areas of granulomatous inflammation. Granulomatous vasculitis may affect all levels from the large elastic pulmonary arteries to the venules, although the lesions are more marked in the veins than in the arteries. Necrotizing sarcoid granulomatosis, first reported in 1973, is characterized by extensive noncaseating granulomatous inflammation with foci of parenchymal necrosis, combined with marked vasculitis affecting both the arteries and the veins (61). The granulomas may resolve without sequelae or leave fibrotic changes. Concentric fibrosis surrounding the granulomas is nearly always found. In addition, progressive pulmonary fibrosis with interstitial thickening by hyalinized fibrous tissue may be responsible for interstitial parenchymal fibrosis, which ultimately results in end-stage lung disease.

3.1.4.2. Pathological features in the alternative diseases

Epithelioid granulomas develop in many infectious and non-infectious diseases (62–66). For example, the granulomas in chronic beryllium disease closely resemble sarcoid granulomas (Figure 5D). Inorganic agents (e.g., aluminum) can be identified by polarized light examination (Figures 5E,F) or special methods (67). The pathologist must consider all the lung diseases in which the organization of macrophages and macrophage-derived cells, with variable numbers of lymphocytes, resembles that seen in sarcoidosis. A granulomatous reaction per se is not specific of sarcoidosis, as shown in Table 2, and may be an immunological and inflammatory response to factors such as bacteria (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Figures 5G,J) or nontuberculous mycobacteria). Controversial examples are hot-tub lung (68, 69) and Whipple’s disease (70) (Figures 5M,N). Fungal infections (e.g., Histoplasma capsulatum, Cryptococcus, Pneumocystis) may be misdiagnosed (Figures 5K,L) (71). Parasites (e.g., Schistosoma mansoni) may produce arterial granulomas responsible for pulmonary arterial hypertension (72). Exposure to organic airborne agents can cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis characterized by poorly formed granulomas that are often difficult to identify (65). In addition, granulomas develop in various systemic diseases including common variable immune deficiency, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Sjögren’s syndrome, and Crohn’s disease. Figure 5O illustrates the various granuloma patterns, with the characteristics and extent of necrosis, and lists the methods for identifying causative agents (e.g., special stains and polarized light examination). These distinctive features are summarized in Table 2.

3.1.4.3. Bronchoalveolar lavage

BAL is a safe and minimally invasive procedure that has been widely performed for nearly 40 years (73). Its relevance for diagnosing diffuse interstitial lung disease remains debated (65, 74). However, in patients with sarcoidosis, BAL allows the demonstration of CD4+ T-cell lymphocytic alveolitis (75). Although this finding is not specific, once infections have been ruled out, a lymphocyte count above 25% strongly suggests sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, or drug toxicity (65, 76, 77). In sarcoidosis, moderate lavage-fluid lymphocytosis (20%–50%) is found in 80% of cases, and the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio is higher than 3.5 in 50% of cases. The CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio is of controversial diagnostic relevance and, in practice, should be considered informative only when above 3.5, when its specificity is 93%–96% but its sensitivity only 53%–59% (78). Studies that used integrated differential analyses of lavage-fluid cells achieved either by a computer program based on a logistic model (79) or by Bayesian analysis (80) suggested that low percentages of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils combined with a high CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio may raise the likelihood of sarcoidosis to more than 85% (80). BAL, although perhaps not decisive for the diagnosis, has a major role to play in research on sarcoidosis. Thus, recent data obtained using this investigation have generated new hypotheses about the possible role in sarcoidosis for B cells (81) and for causal agents such as Aspergillus antigens (82).

3.1.5. Microbiology

3.1.5.1. Microbiology of mycobacteria

The prompt and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis is essential. To establish a definite diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, mycobacteria of the M. tuberculosis complex must be identified in pathological samples such as respiratory secretions (e.g., sputum), lymphadenopathy, other infected tissues, or pleural fluid. The microbiology laboratory must perform microscopic examinations and cultures according to standardized procedures (83, 84). The diagnosis of tuberculosis relies on the interpretation of findings from multiple tests including the microscopic examination of stained pathological samples, cultures, and genome-amplification tests designed to identify M. tuberculosis complex organisms.

The microscopic examination of smears takes less than 1 hour. Two methods are used routinely: (i) the auramine O fluorescent stain, usually chosen for screening, with a reading at X25 or X40 magnification and (ii) the Ziehl-Neelsen stain, used to confirm a positive auramine O test, with a reading at X100 magnification. Culturing is the reference test, since it identifies a bacterial strain belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex, but at least 10 to 30 days are required.

M. tuberculosis complex detection based on polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) gene amplification of samples (PCR-TB test) is a routine investigation recommended for diagnosing tuberculosis (85, 86). When applied to samples positive by microscopy, this test can identify M. tuberculosis complex organisms within a few hours, thereby allowing appropriate patient management before the culture results are available (87–89).

The microscopic examination of stained smears has two main limitations: (i) it does not reliably distinguish between M. tuberculosis complex and nontuberculous mycobacteria and (ii) its sensitivity is lower compared to cultures, as the results are positive only with loads above 5,000 to 10,000 bacilli/mL of sample compared to 1 bacillus/mL, in theory, for cultures. Smear examination can rapidly detect those patients with the highest bacillus loads and account for about 50–60% of patients with culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (89–91). Sensitivity increases with the number of samples examined with a sensitivity of 74%, 86%, and 92% with one, two, and three samples, respectively (92).

Culturing is the reference standard test for diagnosing tuberculosis. The samples are first decontaminated and centrifuged to kill nontuberculous bacteria (pyogenic and commensal bacteria), which grow faster than do mycobacteria and can contaminate cultures (93). The sample is then inoculated either onto solid Löwenstein-Jensen medium, which is incubated at 35°C–37°C and produces visible colonies within 21 to 28 days, or into liquid medium, which can produce colonies within 10 to 21 days. A microscopic examination is then performed to confirm the presence of acid-alcohol resistant bacteria. With solid medium, the results are expressed quantitatively as the number of colonies per tube. With liquid medium, the time to a positive detection signal correlates with the amount of bacilli, thus providing a semi-quantitative estimate. The culture is reported as negative after 42 days with liquid medium and 60 days with solid medium. The identification of mycobacteria recovered by culturing was classically based on several cultural and biochemical features. This method is being increasingly replaced by molecular techniques (RNA/DNA hybridization, amplification of specific gene regions or insertion sequences) or by an immunochromatographic test that detects the MPT64 antigen (83).

An alternative method relies on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), which provides a characteristic mass spectral fingerprint of whole inactivated mycobacterial cells. This method is accurate for identifying bacteria. Its simplicity, speed, and affordability make it suitable as a routine technique for identifying mycobacteria (94, 95).

Many tests marketed since the 1990s use gene-amplification techniques (PCR-TB tests) to identify mycobacteria of the M. tuberculosis complex within a few hours (standard or real-time PCR, ligase chain reaction, transcription-mediated amplification, nucleic-acid sequence-based amplification, isothermal amplification) (87, 96–99). Automated PCR tests (notably the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay) can detect M. tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance simultaneously, generally within 2 hours. Overall, sensitivity of these tests is about 80%–90% with culture-positive respiratory samples but only 60%–70% with smear-negative samples (85). Specificity is 98%–99% (85, 86, 100).

With extrapulmonary samples, the larger the volume the greater the likelihood of identifying the bacteria. For example, for possibly tuberculous lymph nodes, needle aspiration alone has a limited diagnostic yield, except in countries where tuberculosis is uncommon or when a PCR test is performed on the aspirate (101). However, PCR requires special equipment, reagents, and technician time that may not be available in low-income countries.

3.1.5.2. Microbiology of nonmycobacterial microorganisms

Histoplasmosis is diagnosed either by identification of the organism upon microscopic examination and culturing of sputum or tissue samples or by PCR testing of whole blood. Histoplasma capsulatum is a dimorphic fungus. Urine can be tested for Histoplasma antigen.

Several bacteria other than mycobacteria may cause symptoms suggestive of sarcoidosis and should be sought using standard bacteriological tests before considering tests for organisms that are more challenging to identify. Most of these bacteria are easily recovered by culturing then identified by routinely available MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Unlike M. tuberculosis, these bacteria do not require any special precautions in the laboratory. If the standard cultures are negative, PCR tests for the 16S rRNA gene can be performed as they may, in some cases, identify the causative bacterial agent.

Syphilis and leprosy do not typically damage the lung parenchyma. A single case of syphilitic granuloma in the lung parenchyma has been reported (102). The diagnosis relies mainly on indirect methods, i.e., serology or PCR testing, which are performed only in selected cases.

To look for viruses such as the human immunodeficiency virus, varicella-zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus, specific tests must be ordered. The diagnosis is usually achieved by specific PCR or serological tests, which are selected based on the clinical presentation, country of residence, and local epidemiology.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing may, in the future, prove a useful and rapid tool for detecting bacteria, fungi, or viruses in granulomatous tissue. Advantages of this technique include the simultaneous identification of multiple pathogens, detection of microorganisms that are present in small amounts or difficult to grow, and feasibility on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue.

3.1.6. Other investigations

Increased serum angiotensin converting enzyme level and abnormal calcium and vitamin D metabolism are often observed in sarcoidosis. However, both abnormalities are neither sensitive nor specific. They can be abnormal in several other granulomatous conditions particularly tuberculosis and CBD and even in non-granulomatous conditions like lymphomas.

18FFluodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) CT (PET/CT) is the most sensitive test to assess activity in involved organs in sarcoidosis and no study has been done to assess its usefulness for diagnosis. There are not dedicated studies comparing PET/CT in sarcoidosis and other granulomatous or non-granulomatous diseases like for example lymphomas. Moreover, its use has not been recommended at diagnosis except in rare cases where a cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected (1).

3.2. More on alternative diseases: when can they mimic sarcoidosis and which tools can establish the differential diagnosis?

3.2.1. Infections

In Western European countries, Africa, and Asia, tuberculosis is the leading differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis. In North America, in contrast, nontuberculous mycobacterial infections and histoplasmosis may be more common than tuberculosis.

3.2.1.1. Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis is the main differential diagnosis in most countries. The importance of assessing the epidemiological setting is highlighted above (section 3.1.1.) The prompt and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis is essential.

3.2.1.1.1. When is the differential diagnosis most difficult?

Sarcoidosis is particularly difficult to diagnose in patients with rare and atypical radiological presentations such as unilateral hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy, necrotic lymphadenopathy, predominantly bronchiolar micronodular infiltration or miliary, lung cavitations, or pleural effusion. These presentations should suggest tuberculosis, particularly in endemic regions (section 3.1.1.). The absence of caseating granulomas does not rule out tuberculosis (103). In all patients, including those with imaging-study findings typical for sarcoidosis, mycobacteria should be sought in biopsy specimens and, if performed, by BAL.

3.2.1.1.2. How to definitively rule out tuberculosis

Tuberculosis is easily ruled out when the following criteria are combined: country with a low incidence of tuberculosis, no contact with tuberculosis patients, radiological findings typical for sarcoidosis (section 3.1.3.), absence of clinical or imaging-study findings suggestive of tuberculosis, and negative microbiological tests on respiratory samples (sputum, BAL fluid) or tissue specimens (obtained by endobronchial ultrasound or other methods and examined using specific stains and microbiological techniques, section 3.1.5.1.).

However, in countries where tuberculosis is endemic (e.g., India), tuberculosis is more difficult to definitively rule out at presentation, as shown by a recent study of the Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Scores (7). Sarcoidosis often produces misleading constitutional symptoms such as fever, weight loss, and fatigue (104). In a study of patients with sarcoidosis in India, the lymph nodes appeared necrotic or nonhomogeneous by chest CT in 5.9% of cases, and necrotizing granulomas were found in tissue samples in 13.5% of cases (104). Stronger arguments for sarcoidosis are tuberculin anergy (71.9% of cases), typical isolated bilateral lymphadenopathy, and absence of necrosis by CT and/or histopathology. In tuberculosis-endemic countries, the proportion of presentations mimicking sarcoidosis is, as everywhere else, low but the high absolute number of tuberculosis cases increases the risk of confusion with sarcoidosis, particularly as microbiological studies for M. tuberculosis, including PCR tests, can produce false-negative results (105). Moreover, the tuberculin skin test and interferon-γ release assay can be negative despite confirmed tuberculosis, notably in elderly patients or when the peripheral lymphocyte count is low (106–108). In doubtful cases, the initiation of tuberculosis treatment is often wise, as the diagnosis of sarcoidosis may be confirmed only by the clinical course during tuberculosis treatment, which usually differs between tuberculosis and sarcoidosis.

Interestingly, in one study, the risk of developing sarcoidosis was significantly increased in patients with tuberculosis, particularly involving extrapulmonary sites (109). Moreover, the two diseases may co-exist at presentation. In this situation, only the accumulation of evidence over time can clarify the diagnosis.

3.2.1.2. Nontuberculous mycobacteria

The clinical presentation and imaging-study findings closely resemble those seen in tuberculosis. Several specific features that vary across mycobacterial species deserve note. Fibrocavitary lesions in the lung apices are more common with Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium malmoense, whereas bronchiolar micronodules with a tree-in-bud appearance and bronchiectasis more often indicate Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection. Isolated or multiple nodules can be found in M. avium complex and Mycobacterium xenopi infections.

To rule out nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, microbiological studies should be performed, as they usually allow the isolation and identification of mycobacteria. However, the diagnosis may be difficult in patients with multiple pulmonary nodules by chest CT, since investigations for mycobacteria in respiratory secretions or BAL fluid may be falsely negative. In this situation, the only definitive test is a surgical biopsy examined using specific microbiological techniques (section 3.1.5.1.).

3.2.1.3. Histoplasmosis

Histoplasmosis may be a differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis in several circumstances.

3.2.1.3.1. When is the differential diagnosis most difficult?

When the presentation is acute, imaging studies may be misleading if they show both lymphadenopathy, which may be bilateral, and diffuse lung micronodules. However, the clinical presentation more closely resembles that of community-acquired pneumonia, and the epidemiological setting is suggestive (section 3.1.1.).

In everyday practice, the differential diagnosis with sarcoidosis is most difficult in patients with (i) multiple chronic pulmonary nodules or (ii) pulmonary hypertension revealing previously unrecognized late-stage mediastinal fibrosis.

3.2.1.3.2. How to definitively rule out histoplasmosis

Histoplasmosis occurs in specific epidemiological settings (section 3.1.1.) The diagnosis relies on the identification of the causal organism by microscopic examination of sputum or tissue and by culturing or PCR testing of whole blood.

3.2.1.4. Other infections

Other bacteria that may cause symptoms and chest-imaging findings suggestive of pulmonary sarcoidosis are very rare. Q fever is usually diagnosed indirectly, by serological or PCR testing. Whipple’s disease is an infection by the Gram-positive bacillus Tropheryma whipplei. Patients usually present with weight loss (93%), diarrhea (81%), and arthralgia (73%). Pulmonary involvement is extremely rare and produces diffuse pulmonary ground-glass opacities predominating in the lower subpleural areas, pleural involvement, and noncaseating pulmonary granulomas (70, 72, 110, 111). The diagnosis relies on the identification of T. whipplei in various samples, including BAL fluid, using quantitative PCR (111). The BAL fluid shows neutrophilia and eosinophilia, as opposed to lymphocytosis, and stains with periodic acid-Schiff. As indicated above (section 3.1.5.2.), syphilis is an exceedingly rare cause of lung granulomatosis.

Tests for viruses such as the varicella-zoster virus and cytomegalovirus should be selected based on the clinical history and epidemiology. Persistent diffuse lung micronodules can be found long after typical adulthood varicella. Although COVID-19 does not appear to cause granulomas, possibly coincidental sarcoidosis-like disease diagnosed shortly after COVID-19 onset has been reported in three patients (112).

Several fungal infections other than histoplasmosis can cause granulomatous lung diseases that usually mimic tuberculosis. These infections occur chiefly in immunocompromised patients, but rare cases have been reported in immunocompetent individuals. They include cryptococcosis, coccidioidomycosis, and mucormycosis (113–115).

Parasitic infections cause pulmonary granulomatous diseases only very rarely and only in endemic countries. Leishmaniosis and paragonimiasis are examples, as well as schistosomiasis due to S. mansoni, which can present as pulmonary arterial hypertension with liver fibrosis and portal hypertension (72, 116, 117).

3.2.2. Occupational and environmental diseases

3.2.2.1. Chronic beryllium disease

Chronic beryllium disease can develop in individuals who are exposed to beryllium, usually at the workplace, and develop sensitization to this metal (118, 119). The features of the pulmonary granulomatous disease caused by beryllium closely match those of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

3.2.2.1.1. When is the differential diagnosis most difficult?

The circumstances of the diagnosis vary widely. Chronic beryllium disease is readily diagnosed when the manifestations are detected during routine workplace monitoring of workers exposed to beryllium. However, individuals may be unaware of the exposure. Unless a systematic and detailed occupational history is obtained, sarcoidosis is often erroneously diagnosed at first, given the similarities in radiological, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme assay, BAL, and histopathology findings (120, 121). Moreover, the tuberculin test is often negative in chronic beryllium disease. Interestingly, gene expression patterns in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells were not different between patients with chronic beryllium disease and sarcoidosis (122). The only reported differences are rare extrapulmonary manifestations and rare voluminous hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy in chronic beryllium disease (118). In one study, among 84 patients with potential beryllium exposure and suspected or diagnosed sarcoidosis, 34 were diagnosed as having chronic beryllium disease instead, based on a positive beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (120). Of these 34 patients, 28 had first been diagnosed with sarcoidosis, the median time between the two diagnoses being 3 [0.25–18] years.

3.2.2.1.2. How to definitively rule out chronic beryllium disease

Differentiating chronic beryllium disease from sarcoidosis relies chiefly on two investigations: first, a systematic and detailed occupational history including questions about possible occupational beryllium exposure should be obtained in every patient with suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis and, second, a beryllium hypersensitivity test is mandatory in all patients with a history of beryllium exposure, even in the distant past.

Occupational beryllium exposure may occur during primary beryllium and beryllium-alloy production; in dental laboratories; in nuclear power plants; during nuclear weapon manufacturing; and during aerospace or ceramic manufacturing (119). Beryllium exposure has also been reported in security guards, accountants, exposed workers’ spouses, and people living near beryllium-production facilities. Exposure may be demonstrated unexpectedly, as shown recently in workers who inhaled concrete dusts containing high beryllium concentrations (123).

Beryllium hypersensitivity can be demonstrated by performing a beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test. The result is abnormal when the lymphocyte count is greater than 15%. Two or more abnormal results on blood, one abnormal and one borderline result on blood, or one positive result on BAL fluid confirms beryllium hypersensitivity (119). In clinical practice, the absence of an occupational history of beryllium exposure combined with two negative beryllium lymphocyte proliferation tests on blood rule out chronic beryllium disease.

HLA-DPB1 alleles encoding a glutamic acid residue at position 69 of the β-chain (Glu69) are associated with an increased risk of both beryllium hypersensitivity and chronic beryllium disease, with odds ratios greater than 10 (118). However, the Glu69 variant can be found in healthy individuals and is absent in 25% of patients with chronic beryllium disease. Thus, HLA-DPB1 testing has no role as a diagnostic investigation for chronic beryllium disease.

3.2.2.2. Non-beryllium-metal-induced granulomatosis

Positive lymphocyte transformation tests to metals other than beryllium have been reported in patients with sarcoidosis-like presentations and workplace exposures to metals (e.g., during jewelry manufacturing or welding). The metals/minerals were aluminum, nickel, titanium, chromium, palladium, silica, mercury, and zirconium. Thus, some patients given a diagnosis of sarcoidosis may have metal-induced sarcoidosis-like granulomatous disease (124, 125).

3.2.2.3. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, notably in its nonfibrotic form, is caused by exposure to airborne environmental or occupational antigens and can share features with sarcoidosis. However, differentiation from sarcoidosis is generally easy, as shown by a study of the Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Scores (7). The onset may be acute, subacute, or insidious, and recurrent episodes may develop. Crackles are common and squawks may be heard. Although many patients have constitutional symptoms including weight loss, the disease is limited to the lungs, without extrapulmonary organ involvement. At least 40% of patients have either exposure to or serum IgG against an environmental or occupational inciting agent (e.g., avian antigens, bacteria, mycobacteria, fungi, isocyanates). The imaging findings typically differ from those in sarcoidosis (section 3.1.3.) (76, 126). Although BAL fluid lymphocytosis occurs in both hypersensitivity pneumonitis and sarcoidosis, a relative lymphocyte count above 50% has been reported in half the patients with the former versus almost none with the latter (80). In BAL fluid, the total cell count, percentages of neutrophils and eosinophils, and percentage of mast cells — this last having the greatest discriminating power — tend to be higher in hypersensitivity pneumonitis than in sarcoidosis, whereas the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio tends to be above normal in sarcoidosis and below normal in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (80, 127). Combining the history with blood-test, imaging-study, and BAL findings usually suffices to differentiate hypersensitivity pneumonitis from sarcoidosis. The granulomas found in transbronchial lung-biopsy specimens in hypersensitivity pneumonitis are typically small and poorly formed and tend to predominate in the peribronchiolar interstitium (section 3.1.3.). This finding combined with those of the above-listed investigations is highly discriminating.

3.2.2.4. Hot-tub lung

Hot-tub lung is an infrequent interstitial lung disease secondary to the inhalation of aerosolized hot-tub water containing nontuberculous mycobacteria (M. avium or Mycobacterium phocaicum) (128). Chest CT findings may closely resemble those in hypersensitivity pneumonitis, with diffuse ground-glass opacities and mosaic attenuation. However, the lung biopsy shows different features consisting in nonnecrotizing and mostly well-formed granulomas in a bronchocentric distribution. Differentiation from sarcoidosis is easy even in the absence of a lung biopsy, based on (i) use of a hot tub, (ii) the very different CT images, and (iii) the recovery of nontuberculous mycobacteria from respiratory specimens.

3.2.2.5. Granulomatous talcosis

Pulmonary granulomatous talcosis can produce radiological abnormalities resembling those seen in sarcoidosis (section 3.1.3.) (39). A history of inhaled or intravenous drug abuse suggests the diagnosis. Confirmation is provided by lung biopsy, which shows small diffuse granulomas at the level of the terminal or respiratory bronchioles, with birefringent bodies within giant cells by polarized light microscopy (129). These lesions are more similar to foreign-body granulomas than to sarcoid granulomas.

3.2.3. Drugs

A recent WHO pharmacovigilance review reported 2,425 cases of drug-induced sarcoidosis and strong associations with TNF-a antagonists, interferon, pegylated interferon, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (19, 130, 131).

3.2.3.1. TNF-a antagonist-induced granulomatous diseases

Despite data supporting the use of TNF-a antagonists to treat sarcoidosis, these drugs have been reported to induce sarcoid-like reactions (18, 132). Etanercept was most often involved, but cases were also seen with adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, and biosimilars. The reason for TNF-a antagonist therapy was usually rheumatoid arthritis, although some patients had ankylosing arthritis, Crohn’s disease, or even sarcoidosis (133–136). TNF-a antagonist-induced granulomatous disease is rare; thus, only four (0.57%) cases were identified among 697 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (133). The mean duration of TNF-a antagonist exposure has varied widely, from 7 to 123 months in rheumatoid arthritis and 1 to 180 months in Crohn’s disease. Diffuse lung infiltration with or without hilar lymphadenopathy was common. Peripheral lymphadenopathy, uveitis, and involvement of the spleen, muscle, parotid glands, and spinal cord have also been reported. Laboratory test abnormalities included hypercalcemia, which was severe in some patients, and elevated serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels. Diagnostic challenges arise due to the low incidence of TNF-a antagonist-induced granulomatosis, wide variability in exposure duration at symptom onset, and possible presence of symptoms due to the underlying disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn’s disease) (137, 138). The prompt fading of the manifestations after withdrawal of the suspected drug strongly supports TNF-a antagonist-induced granulomatous disease. In patients with sarcoidosis, worsening of the disease during TNF-a antagonist therapy is difficult to interpret, particularly given the paucity of relevant information in the literature. A relapse after an initial response to TNF-a antagonist therapy may indicate either drug-induced granulomatous disease or the development of antidrug antibodies, as reported with infliximab or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (139, 140). Antidrug antibody assays are very useful in this situation.

3.2.3.2. Sarcoid-like reaction to anticancer drugs

Some of the most recent anticancer drugs including immunotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies have been incriminated in the development of granulomas. The recent WHO pharmacovigilance report recognizes PD-1, CTLA4 (103 cases), and BRAF and MEK inhibitors (37 cases) as causes of sarcoid-like granulomatosis (130).

3.2.3.2.1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors

Pulmonary granulomatosis was first described with CTLA-4 inhibitors then with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. In several patients, the CTLA-4 inhibitors ipilimumab and tremelimumab seem to have caused cutaneous, lymph-node, and lung involvement with noncaseating granulomas, as well as lymphocytic alveolitis (141–144). Time to symptom onset was usually three to 6 months. The PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab has been associated with granulomatosis of the lungs and of other organs including the eyes (145). This appears to be a class effect, as granuloma formation has been reported with the PD1 inhibitors pembrolizumab (146) and nivolumab (147) and with the PD-L1 inhibitors atezolizumab (148), durvalumab (149), and avelumab (150). The time to onset in patients given both CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitor therapy may be shorter, as with all toxicities from immunotherapies (151). Retrospective data suggest that a sarcoid-like reaction may be associated with a better prognosis. Of 434 retrospectively reviewed patients with adverse effects of checkpoint inhibitor therapy, 28 had sarcoid-like reactions, which were asymptomatic in half the cases and often manifested only as mild dyspnea or a cough with no serious lung impairments in the other cases. The most common primary cancer was melanoma and most patients with taking both CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors. Compared to the 406 patients with other adverse events, those with sarcoid-like reactions had better overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.232; 95% confidence interval, 0.086–0.630; p = 0.002) in this retrospective study (152).

Importantly, patients with sarcoid-like reactions are at risk of being misdiagnosed either with cancer progression in the absence of histological studies or with an infection precipitated by the treatment-induced immunosuppression (combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy). Sarcoid-like reactions can mimic cancer progression. Of 45 patients given adjuvant combined nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy for melanoma, 10 (22%) were diagnosed with sarcoid-like reactions manifesting most often as hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy and in some patients as skin and bone involvement (153). An unresolved issue is whether the type of primary cancer and/or disease stage affect the incidence of sarcoid-like reactions (153). Findings that strongly support a need for histological studies include atypical changes in the radiological abnormalities, a dissociated radiological response, and a marked discrepancy between the radiological and clinical signs.

3.2.3.2.2. Targeted therapies

Other anticancer treatments that can induce sarcoid-like reactions include BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Cases have been reported with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib used alone (154) or with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib combined with a MEK inhibitor (trametinib or cobimetinib) (155, 156). Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, uveitis, and cutaneous involvement have been reported (154). These manifestations were usually not severe, and the cutaneous and ophthalmological abnormalities resolved promptly with topical treatment despite continuation of the anticancer drugs. In one patient, however, acute kidney injury required discontinuation of the targeted treatment and the administration of corticosteroid therapy (155).

3.2.3.2.3. Intravesical BCG therapy for bladder cancer

Intravesical BCG therapy for bladder cancer can cause systemic granulomatosis (157, 158). Granulomatous pneumonitis, sometimes with systemic involvement, has been reported in 0.7%–0.9% of patients (159, 160). The pathogenesis of BCG-related granulomatous pneumonitis is debated but may involve a hypersensitivity reaction to disseminated BCG (158).

The chest radiograph may be normal or show a miliary pattern mimicking disseminated tuberculosis, a fungal infection, or hematogenous metastases (158).

3.2.3.3. Interferon-induced pulmonary granulomatous disease

New treatments for hepatitis have largely superseded interferon-a, except for patients with hepatitis delta. Interferon-induced pulmonary granulomatous disease has therefore become rare.

3.2.3.4. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for HIV infection

A sarcoidosis-like disease can develop in HIV-positive patients who have responded to antiretroviral therapy by a rise in CD4 T-cell counts and a fall in viral loads. In 10 retrospectively identified HIV-positive patients with a newly diagnosed, sarcoidosis-like disease, the chest CT findings resembled those produced by sarcoidosis in HIV-negative patients: they consisted of lymphadenopathy, nodules, thickened interlobular septa, focal consolidation, reticular opacities, ground-glass opacities, and cyst-like or other cavities (161). In HIV-positive patients receiving HAART, sarcoidosis-like manifestations may indicate true sarcoidosis related to restoration of the immune system.

3.2.3.5. Other drug-induced pulmonary granulomatous diseases

The monoclonal antibodies rituximab, omalizumab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and natalizumab are suspected causes of pulmonary granulomatosis (130, 162, 163). Mesalamine has been suggested to induce pulmonary granuloma formation when used to treat Crohn’s disease.

3.2.4. Immune deficiencies

3.2.4.1. Pulmonary granulomatosis-associated common variable immunodeficiency

This disease often results in recurrent bacterial respiratory infections (65% of cases), bronchiectasis, and autoimmune manifestations (40% of cases) and may co-exist with lymphoproliferative disorders (21). However, the disease may remain asymptomatic until sarcoid-like abnormalities develop. Findings may include mediastinal lymphadenopathy and bronchial or parenchymal granulomas (21). The pulmonary granulomatous lesions may be isolated or co-exist with organizing pneumonia, lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis, follicular bronchiolitis, or lymphoid hyperplasia. The term “granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease” has been used to designate this condition but remains controversial (21, 164). Serum protein electrophoresis, which must be part of the diagnostic workup for sarcoidosis, shows hypogammaglobulinemia, thereby establishing the diagnosis (1). Importantly, the chest CT findings differ substantially from those seen in sarcoidosis (section 3.1.3.).

3.2.4.2. Pulmonary manifestations in adults with chronic granulomatous disease

Chronic granulomatous disease is a rare inherited primary immunodeficiency caused by a mutation in the NADPH oxidase gene. The respiratory manifestations are major complications. The diagnosis is usually made in early childhood upon the evaluation of recurrent infections. The pulmonary infections are often chronic and may be asymptomatic, notably when caused by Aspergillus fumigatus. A biopsy of persistent pulmonary nodules or consolidations is often required and frequently shows noncaseating granulomas. Radiological presentations mimicking sarcoidosis are very rare (165, 166). The repeated infections starting at a very young age combined with the radiological presentation usually make sarcoidosis very improbable.

3.2.5. Genetic diseases

Blau syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder due to NOD2 mutations, of which over 15 have been identified (167, 168). Familial cases are present in 40% of patients. The onset is usually at 3–4 years of age (15). Most patients have the typical triad of skin involvement, symmetrical polyarthritis, and uveitis. Lung involvement has been reported in a single patient, who had ground-glass opacities in the middle and lower lobes (169). The diagnosis is based on the presentation and results of genetic testing for NOD2 mutations. Thus, Blau syndrome is easily differentiated from sarcoidosis (170).

3.2.6. Vasculitides and autoimmune diseases

3.2.6.1. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis

This disease typically manifests as necrotizing granulomatous inflammation of the ears, nose, and upper and lower respiratory tracts and as necrotizing vasculitis involving the small- to medium-sized vessels, often with glomerulonephritis (171).

The differential diagnosis with sarcoidosis is rarely difficult unless the lung is the only site involved, with condensations or noncavitated nodular lesions. However, differences with sarcoidosis include the absence of co-existing perilymphatic micronodular lesions and of lymphadenopathy (46). A positive assay for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies directed to proteinase 3 (PR3-ANCA) is highly specific but only 60% sensitive. In doubtful cases, a lung biopsy, performed surgically to ensure the collection of sufficient material, may be indicated. The typical histological pattern is a triad of vasculitis, necrosis, and granulomatous inflammation, which may co-exist with organizing pneumonia or alveolar hemorrhage.

3.2.6.2. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Lung granulomas can develop in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, producing a radiological presentation very similar to that seen in granulomatosis with polyangiitis. However, differentiation with sarcoidosis is readily achieved based on the history of asthma (often severe), marked blood eosinophilia, serum C-reactive protein elevation, and positive assays for perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies.

3.2.6.3. Necrotizing sarcoid granulomatosis

“Necrotizing sarcoid granulomatosis” is still a provisional diagnostic term, given the uncertainty about whether it represents necrotizing angiitis with a sarcoid reaction or true sarcoidosis with a distinctive pathological pattern (172). The epidemiology and presentation are very similar to those of sarcoidosis. However, thoracic lymphadenopathy occurs in only 33% of patients. The only clear difference lies in the pathological findings. However, a possible source of bias is that the lung specimens are often obtained surgically and are therefore larger than for sarcoidosis. The prevailing view at present is that necrotizing sarcoid granulomatosis is a form of sarcoidosis (172).

3.2.6.4. Interstitial lung disease associated with Sjögren’s syndrome

Interstitial lung disease, sometimes with granulomatous pulmonary lesions, may develop in patients with sicca due to Sjögren’s syndrome. Very infrequently, this condition may require differentiation from sarcoidosis with pulmonary fibrosis producing linear opacities extending from the hilum to the subpleural area (173). However, the pathological features of granulomatous lesions in Sjögren’s syndrome differ markedly from those of sarcoid granulomas (section 3.1.4.).

3.2.7. Crohn’s disease

Noninfectious pulmonary involvement has rarely been studied in patients with Crohn’s disease. The first diagnosis to consider is an adverse drug reaction, for instance to mesalamine or a TNF-a antagonist (174). In practice, Crohn’s disease is never per se the cause of pulmonary granulomatosis. At the trachea, in contrast, macroscopic abnormalities can be visible by endoscopy, a finding never observed in sarcoidosis (175). Crohn’s disease and sarcoidosis may co-exist (176).

3.2.8. Granulomatosis associated with lymphoma and solid malignancies

Non-caseating granulomas have been reported in 0.7–13% of patients with malignancies (177) including lymphomas; testicular, breast, lung, and head-and-neck cancer; and melanoma (177, 178). Sarcoidosis-like granulomas were identified in 14% of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and 7% with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (179, 180). The granulomas may develop within the tumor itself or in the regional draining lymph nodes (e.g., mediastinal nodes in lung cancer). Distant lymph nodes may be involved, and lung nodules may develop remotely from primary skin melanoma (178, 179). The granulomas may be identified only many years after the diagnosis of cancer. The main diagnostic challenge is differentiation from metastases. A granulomatous reaction to cancer is readily distinguished from sarcoidosis when it is present only in the neighborhood of the malignancy. Investigations for granulomas at other sites must therefore be performed. Sometimes, a typical sarcoidosis can be evidenced upon review of earlier investigations. In challenging cases, only the collection of further data during follow-up can establish the diagnosis.

The risk of lymphoma is 2-fold to 11-fold higher in patients with vs. without sarcoidosis (179, 181). Thus, manifestations that develop during the course of sarcoidosis may be due to lymphoma. On the other hand, clinical events in patients with lymphoma may be due to another disease. One study identified 14 new and 25 previously reported patients in whom sarcoidosis developed after a diagnosis of Hodgkin’s or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (182).

Lymphomatoid granulomatosis is a rare B-cell lymphoproliferative disease associated with Epstein–Barr virus infection. Multiple lung nodules predominating in the middle to lower lung fields may develop. The diagnosis is confirmed by the identification of atypical B cells positive for Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small non-polyadenylated RNA 1 and 2 (EBER). These cells may be sparse and associated with nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation (183).

4. Conclusion

Alternative diagnoses must be ruled out before a diagnosis of sarcoidosis can be given. To this end, a rigorous diagnostic strategy must be applied. First, epidemiological factors must be clarified, including local infectious diseases, regions of travel, occupational and environmental exposures, drug abuse, exposure to medications, and family history. A detailed medical history and thorough physical examination are also crucial, as they may, for instance, suggest an immunodeficiency or identify extrapulmonary abnormalities that may be characteristic of specific diseases. Chest CT is very helpful, particularly when read by a highly experienced radiologist who can characterize the findings as typical or atypical for sarcoidosis and for the alternative diagnoses. All other investigations are guided by this information. A study reported nearly three decades ago used Bayes’ theorem to diagnose chronic interstitial lung diseases based only on clinical and radiological findings (184). High confidence (greater than 95% probability) in a final correct diagnosis of sarcoidosis was obtained in 80% and 78% of patients in the training and validation sets, respectively. The improvements in CT acquisition and interpretation achieved since this study was done would probably result in even better performance. Another important message is the need to obtain typical granulomas for confirming diagnosis in most of the patients to avoid misdiagnosis with some alternative diseases shown to have a confusing presentation, particularly lymphoproliferative disorders. Eventually, using scores like the Sarcoidosis Diagnosis Scores Clinical and Biopsy can be very helpful to assess sarcoidosis diagnosis before and after granuloma evidence.

Author contributions

DV and FJ conceptualized the review. DV prepared the first draft of the manuscript with MB (for imaging), J-FB (for pathology), EC (for microbiology), and BD (for drug-induced granulomatosis). MB provided the radiological figures and legends. J-FB provided the histological table and figures and legends. DV, MB, J-FB, EC, BD, CR, IB, AM, HN, J-MN, and FJ critically revised and edited the manuscript and agreed to the submitted version. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this review was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Crouser, ED, Maier, LA, Wilson, KC, Bonham, CA, Morgenthau, AS, Patterson, KC, et al. Diagnosis and detection of Sarcoidosis. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2020) 201:e26–51. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0251ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Thillai, M, Atkins, CP, Crawshaw, A, Hart, SP, Ho, L-P, Kouranos, V, et al. BTS clinical statement on pulmonary sarcoidosis. Thorax. (2021) 76:4–20. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214348

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Jeny, F, Bernaudin, J-F, Cohen Aubart, F, Brillet, P-Y, Bouvry, D, Nunes, H, et al. Diagnosis issues in sarcoidosis. Respir Med Res. (2020) 77:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2019.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Judson, MA, Thompson, BW, Rabin, DL, Steimel, J, Knattereud, GL, Lackland, DT, et al. The diagnostic pathway to sarcoidosis. Chest. (2003) 123:406–12. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.2.406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Judson, MA, Costabel, U, Drent, M, Wells, A, Maier, L, Koth, L, et al. The WASOG Sarcoidosis organ assessment instrument: an update of a previous clinical tool. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. (2014) 31:19–27.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

6. Bickett, AN, Lower, EE, and Baughman, RP. Sarcoidosis diagnostic score: a systematic evaluation to enhance the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis. Chest. (2018) 154:1052–60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jeny, F, Vucinic, V, Zhou, Y, Valeyre, D, Bhattacharyya, P, Bickett, AN, et al. Validation of the Sarcoidosis diagnostic score (SDS) in a multicontinental study. Annals ATS. (2022) 20:371–80. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202206-529OC

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Brito-Zerón, P, Kostov, B, Superville, D, Baughman, RP, and Ramos-Casals, M, Autoimmune Big Data Study Group. Geoepidemiological big data approach to sarcoidosis: geographical and ethnic determinants. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2019) 37:1052–64.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

10. Arkema, EV, Grunewald, J, Kullberg, S, Eklund, A, and Askling, J. Sarcoidosis incidence and prevalence: a nationwide register-based assessment in Sweden. Eur Respir J. (2016) 48:1690–9. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00477-2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Duchemann, B, Annesi-Maesano, I, Jacobe de Naurois, C, Sanyal, S, Brillet, P-Y, Brauner, M, et al. Prevalence and incidence of interstitial lung diseases in a multi-ethnic county of greater Paris. Eur Respir J. (2017) 50:1602419. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02419-2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Baker, J, Kosmidis, C, Rozaliyani, A, Wahyuningsih, R, and Denning, DW. Chronic pulmonary Histoplasmosis-a scoping literature review. Open forum Infect Dis. (2020) 7:ofaa119. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Brode, SK, Daley, CL, and Marras, TK. The epidemiologic relationship between tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. (2014) 18:1370–7. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mukhopadhyay, S, Farver, CF, Vaszar, LT, Dempsey, OJ, Popper, HH, Mani, H, et al. Causes of pulmonary granulomas: a retrospective study of 500 cases from seven countries. J Clin Pathol. (2012) 65:51–7. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nathan, N, Marcelo, P, Houdouin, V, Epaud, R, de Blic, J, Valeyre, D, et al. Lung sarcoidosis in children: update on disease expression and management. Thorax. (2015) 70:537–42. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-206825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bein, ME, Putman, CE, McLoud, TC, and Mink, JH. A reevaluation of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in sarcoidosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1978) 131:409–15. doi: 10.2214/ajr.131.3.409

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ganeshan, D, Menias, CO, Lubner, MG, Pickhardt, PJ, Sandrasegaran, K, and Bhalla, S. Sarcoidosis from head to toe: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. (2018) 38:1180–200. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chopra, A, Nautiyal, A, Kalkanis, A, and Judson, MA. Drug-induced Sarcoidosis-like reactions. Chest. (2018) 154:664–77. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Ufuk, F. Pulmonary Sarcoidlike Granulomatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2020) 215:W25. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22800

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Winterbauer, RH, Belic, N, and Moores, KD. Clinical interpretation of bilateral hilar adenopathy. Ann Intern Med. (1973) 78:65–71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-78-1-65

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bouvry, D, Mouthon, L, Brillet, P-Y, Kambouchner, M, Ducroix, J-P, Cottin, V, et al. Granulomatosis associated CVID: a case-control versus sarcoidosis study. Eur Respir J. (2012) 41:115–22. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00189011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Olson, CG, and Olson, NY. Hyper IgG4-related disease presenting with orbital tumor and immune deficiency. Case Rep Immunol. (2021) 2021:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2021/9260051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Muller, R, Ebbo, M, Habert, P, Torrents, J, Gaubert, JY, and Schleinitz, N. Pulmonary IgG4-related disease with favourable response to rituximab: a case report. Respirol Case Rep. (2022) 10:e01061. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.1061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Park, HJ, Jung, JI, Chung, MH, Song, SW, Kim, HL, Baik, JH, et al. Typical and atypical manifestations of Intrathoracic Sarcoidosis. Korean J Radiol. (2009) 10:623–31. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.6.623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Rockoff, SD, and Rohatgi, PK. Unusual manifestations of thoracic sarcoidosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1985) 144:513–28. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.3.513

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bhalla, AS, Das, A, Naranje, P, Goyal, A, Guleria, R, and Khilnani, GC. Dilemma of diagnosing thoracic sarcoidosis in tuberculosis endemic regions: an imaging-based approach. Part 1. Indian J Radiol Imaging. (2017) 27:369–79. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_200_17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Staffolani, S, Buonfrate, D, Angheben, A, Gobbi, F, Giorli, G, Guerriero, M, et al. Acute histoplasmosis in immunocompetent travelers: a systematic review of literature. BMC Infect Dis. (2018) 18:673. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3476-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gross, BH, Schneider, HJ, and Proto, AV. Eggshell calcification of lymph nodes: an update. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1980) 135:1265–8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.135.6.1265

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Gawne-Cain, ML, and Hansell, DM. The pattern and distribution of calcified mediastinal lymph nodes in sarcoidosis and tuberculosis: a CT study. Clin Radiol. (1996) 51:263–7. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(96)80343-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Brauner, MW, Grenier, P, Mompoint, D, Lenoir, S, and de Crémoux, H. Pulmonary sarcoidosis: evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology. (1989) 172:467–71. doi: 10.1148/radiology.172.2.2748828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Colby, TV, and Swensen, SJ. Anatomic distribution and histopathologic patterns in diffuse lung disease: correlation with HRCT. J Thorac Imaging. (1996) 11:1–26. doi: 10.1097/00005382-199601110-00001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Müller, NL, Kullnig, P, and Miller, RR. The CT findings of pulmonary sarcoidosis: analysis of 25 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1989) 152:1179–82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.6.1179

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Newman, LS, Buschman, DL, Newell, JD, and Lynch, DA. Beryllium disease: assessment with CT. Radiology. (1994) 190:835–40. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Kalisz, KR, Ramaiya, NH, Laukamp, KR, and Gupta, A. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-related pneumonitis: patterns and management. Radiographics. (2019) 39:1923–37. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019190036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gkiozos, I, Kopitopoulou, A, Kalkanis, A, Vamvakaris, IN, Judson, MA, and Syrigos, KN. Sarcoidosis-like reactions induced by checkpoint inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol. (2018) 13:1076–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Gurney, JW, and Conces, DJ. Pulmonary histoplasmosis. Radiology. (1996) 199:297–306. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Akira, M, Higashihara, T, Yokoyama, K, Yamamoto, S, Kita, N, Morimoto, S, et al. Radiographic type p pneumoconiosis: high-resolution CT. Radiology. (1989) 171:117–23. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.1.2928514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Remy-Jardin, M, Degreef, JM, Beuscart, R, Voisin, C, and Remy, J. Coal worker’s pneumoconiosis: CT assessment in exposed workers and correlation with radiographic findings. Radiology. (1990) 177:363–71. doi: 10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Marchiori, E, Lourenço, S, Gasparetto, TD, Zanetti, G, Mano, CM, and Nobre, LF. Pulmonary talcosis: imaging findings. Lung. (2010) 188:165–71. doi: 10.1007/s00408-010-9230-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Mathieson, JR, Mayo, JR, Staples, CA, and Müller, NL. Chronic diffuse infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of CT and chest radiography. Radiology. (1989) 171:111–6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.1.2928513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Stein, MG, Mayo, J, Müller, N, Aberle, DR, Webb, WR, and Gamsu, G. Pulmonary lymphangitic spread of carcinoma: appearance on CT scans. Radiology. (1987) 162:371–5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ren, H, Hruban, RH, Kuhlman, JE, Fishman, EK, Wheeler, PS, Zerhouni, EA, et al. Computed tomography of inflation-fixed lungs: the beaded septum sign of pulmonary metastases. J Comput Assist Tomogr. (1989) 13:411–6. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198905000-00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Rech, J-S, Arnulf, B, de Margerie-Mellon, C, Talbot, A, Malphettes, M, Vignon, M, et al. Lower respiratory tract amyloidosis: presentation, survival and prognostic factors. A multicenter consecutive case series. Am J Hematol. (2019) 94:1214–26. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Pickford, HA, Swensen, SJ, and Utz, JP. Thoracic cross-sectional imaging of amyloidosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1997) 168:351–5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016204

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Martin, SG, Kronek, L-P, Valeyre, D, Brauner, N, Brillet, P-Y, Nunes, H, et al. High-resolution computed tomography to differentiate chronic diffuse interstitial lung diseases with predominant ground-glass pattern using logical analysis of data. Eur Radiol. (2010) 20:1297–310. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1671-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. De Margerie-Mellon, C, Dion, G, Darlay, J, Ridene, I, Kambouchner, M, Brauner, N, et al. High-resolution computed tomography to differentiate chronic diffuse infiltrative lung diseases with chronic multifocal consolidation patterns using logical analysis of data. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. (2016) 33:355–71.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

47. Hours, S, Nunes, H, Kambouchner, M, Uzunhan, Y, Brauner, MW, Valeyre, D, et al. Pulmonary cavitary sarcoidosis: clinico-radiologic characteristics and natural history of a rare form of sarcoidosis. Medicine (Baltimore). (2008) 87:142–51. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181775a73

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Chong, S, Lee, KS, Chung, MJ, Han, J, Kwon, OJ, and Kim, TS. Pneumoconiosis: comparison of imaging and pathologic findings. Radiographics. (2006) 26:59–77. doi: 10.1148/rg.261055070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Webb, WR, Stein, MG, Finkbeiner, WE, Im, JG, Lynch, D, and Gamsu, G. Normal and diseased isolated lungs: high-resolution CT. Radiology. (1988) 166:81–7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Bergin, CJ, Bell, DY, Coblentz, CL, Chiles, C, Gamsu, G, MacIntyre, NR, et al. Sarcoidosis: correlation of pulmonary parenchymal pattern at CT with results of pulmonary function tests. Radiology. (1989) 171:619–24. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.3.2717731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Nunes, H, Humbert, M, Capron, F, Brauner, M, Sitbon, O, Battesti, J-P, et al. Pulmonary hypertension associated with sarcoidosis: mechanisms, haemodynamics and prognosis. Thorax. (2006) 61:68–74. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.042838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Caminati, A, Cassandro, R, and Harari, S. Pulmonary hypertension in chronic interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev. (2013) 22:292–301. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00002713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Asano, S. Granulomatous lymphadenitis. J Clin Exp Hematop. (2012) 52:1–16. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.52.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Baughman, RP, and Valeyre, D. Sarcoidosis: a Clinician’s Guide. 1er édition ed Elsevier Health Sciences: Elsevier (2018). 317 p.

Google Scholar

55. Bernaudin, J-F, Moguelet, P, Jeny, F, Besnard, V, Valeyre, D, and Kambouchner, M. Chapter 6—pathology of granuloma In: RP Baughman and D Valeyre, editors. Sarcoidosis. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier (2019). 75–83.

Google Scholar

56. Chapman, JT, and Mehta, AC. Bronchoscopy in sarcoidosis: diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Curr Opin Pulm Med. (2003) 9:402–7. doi: 10.1097/00063198-200309000-00011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Chambellan, A, Turbie, P, Nunes, H, Brauner, M, Battesti, J-P, and Valeyre, D. Endoluminal stenosis of proximal bronchi in sarcoidosis: bronchoscopy, function, and evolution. Chest. (2005) 127:472–81. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.2.472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Polychronopoulos, VS, and Prakash, UBS. Airway involvement in sarcoidosis. Chest. (2009) 136:1371–80. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Pedro, C, Melo, N, Novaise Bastos, H, Magalhães, A, Fernandes, G, Martins, N, et al. Role of Bronchoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of thoracic Sarcoidosis. J Clin Med. (2019) 8:1327. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Agrawal, A, Ghori, U, Chaddha, U, and Murgu, S. Combined EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBNA vs EBUS-TBNA alone for Intrathoracic Adenopathy: a Meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. (2022) 114:340–8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Liebow, AA, and The, J. Burns Amberson lecture--pulmonary angiitis and granulomatosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1973) 108:1–18. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1973.108.1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Zander, DS, and Farver, CF. Pulmonary pathology E-book: a volume in foundations in diagnostic pathology series. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences (2016). 788 p.

Google Scholar

63. Cheung, OY, Muhm, JR, Helmers, RA, Aubry, MC, Tazelaar, HD, Khoor, A, et al. Surgical pathology of granulomatous interstitial pneumonia. Ann Diagn Pathol. (2003) 7:127–38. doi: 10.1016/S1092-9134(02)91219-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Rosen, Y. Pathology of granulomatous pulmonary diseases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2022) 146:233–51. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0543-RA

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Meyer, KC, and Raghu, G. Bronchoalveolar lavage for the evaluation of interstitial lung disease: is it clinically useful? Eur Respir J. (2011) 38:761–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00069509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Travis, WD, Colby, TV, Koss, MN, Rosado-de-Christenson, ML, Müller, NL, and King, TE. (2002). Non-neoplastic disorders of the lower respiratory tract. Atlas of nontumor pathology, American Registry of Pathology and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 2. doi: 10.55418/1881041794

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Baur, X, Sanyal, S, and Abraham, JL. Mixed-dust pneumoconiosis: review of diagnostic and classification problems with presentation of a work-related case. Sci Total Environ. (2019) 652:413–21. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.083

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Khoor, A, Leslie, KO, Tazelaar, HD, Helmers, RA, and Colby, TV. Diffuse pulmonary disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria in immunocompetent people (hot tub lung). Am J Clin Pathol. (2001) 115:755–62. doi: 10.1309/JRDC-0MJV-ACA3-2U9L

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Hanak, V, Kalra, S, Aksamit, TR, Hartman, TE, Tazelaar, HD, and Ryu, JH. Hot tub lung: presenting features and clinical course of 21 patients. Respir Med. (2006) 100:610–5. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Hofmann, P, Durisch, N, Buetikofer, C, and Helmchen, BM. Granulomatous lung disease and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in Whipple’s disease. BMJ Case Rep. (2021) 14:e243633. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-243633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Ekeng, BE, Davies, AA, Osaigbovo, II, Warris, A, Oladele, RO, and Denning, DW. Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary manifestations of fungal infections misdiagnosed as tuberculosis: The need for prompt diagnosis and management. J Fungi (Basel). (2022) 8:460. doi: 10.3390/jof8050460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Ferrari, TCA, Albricker, ACL, Gonçalves, IM, and Freire, CMV. Schistosome-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a review emphasizing pathogenesis. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:724254. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.724254

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Hogea, S-P, Tudorache, E, Pescaru, C, Marc, M, and Oancea, C. Bronchoalveolar lavage: role in the evaluation of pulmonary interstitial disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. (2020) 14:1117–30. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1806063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Wells, AU. The clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage in diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Eur Respir Rev. (2010) 19:237–41. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00005510

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Grunewald, J, and Eklund, A. Role of CD4+ T cells in sarcoidosis. Proc Am Thorac Soc. (2007) 4:461–4. doi: 10.1513/pats.200606-130MS

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Raghu, G, Remy-Jardin, M, Ryerson, CJ, Myers, JL, Kreuter, M, Vasakova, M, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults. An official ATS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2020) 202:e36–69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-2032ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Drent, M, Mansour, K, and Linssen, C. Bronchoalveolar lavage in sarcoidosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. (2007) 28:486–95. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-991521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Costabel, U, Bonella, F, Ohshimo, S, and Guzman, J. Diagnostic modalities in sarcoidosis: BAL, EBUS, and PET. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. (2010) 31:404–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Drent, M, van Nierop, MA, Gerritsen, FA, Wouters, EF, and Mulder, PG. A computer program using BALF-analysis results as a diagnostic tool in interstitial lung diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (1996) 153:736–41. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.2.8564126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Welker, L, Jörres, RA, Costabel, U, and Magnussen, H. Predictive value of BAL cell differentials in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir J. (2004) 24:1000–6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00101303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Bauer, L, Müller, LJ, Volkers, SM, Heinrich, F, Mashreghi, M-F, Ruppert, C, et al. Follicular helper-like T cells in the lung highlight a novel role of B cells in Sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2021) 204:1403–17. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202012-4423OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Greaves, SA, Ravindran, A, Santos, RG, Chen, L, Falta, MT, Wang, Y, et al. CD4+ T cells in the lungs of acute sarcoidosis patients recognize an Aspergillus nidulans epitope. J Exp Med. (2021) 218:e20210785. doi: 10.1084/jem.20210785

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2018). Handbook on tuberculosis laboratory diagnostic methods in the European Union—updated 2018. Available at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/handbook-tuberculosis-laboratory-diagnostic-methods-european-union-updated-2018 (Accessed December 27, 2022).

Google Scholar

84. Référentiel en microbiologie Médicale. Société Française de Microbiologie. Available at: https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/boutique/referentiel-en-microbiologie-medicale-remic/ (Accessed December 26, 2022).

Google Scholar

85. Steingart, KR, Schiller, I, Horne, DJ, Pai, M, Boehme, CC, and Dendukuri, N. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2014) 2014:CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated guidelines for the use of nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2009) 58:7–10.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

87. Gilpin, C, Korobitsyn, A, Migliori, GB, Raviglione, MC, and Weyer, K. The World Health Organization standards for tuberculosis care and management. Eur Respir J. (2018) 51:1800098. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00098-2018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. HCSP. Tuberculoses à bacilles résistants: diagnostic et prise en charge. Paris: Haut Conseil de la Santé Publique (2014).

Google Scholar

89. Migliori, GB, Zellweger, JP, Abubakar, I, Ibraim, E, Caminero, JA, de Vries, G, et al. European union standards for tuberculosis care. Eur Respir J. (2012) 39:807–19. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00203811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Al-Moamary, MS, Black, W, Bessuille, E, Elwood, RK, and Vedal, S. The significance of the persistent presence of acid-fast bacilli in sputum smears in pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest. (1999) 116:726–31. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.3.726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Guthmann, J-P. (2017). Épidémiologie de la tuberculose en France en 2015. Impact de la suspension de l’obligation vaccinale BCG sur la tuberculose de l’enfant, 2007–2015. Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire. 116–26.

Google Scholar

92. Gressens, SB, Billard-Pomares, T, Leboité, H, Cruaud, P, Bouchaud, O, Carbonnelle, E, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis: evaluation of current diagnostic strategy. Infect Dis Now. (2021) 51:273–8. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2020.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Wyplosz, B, Truffot-Pernot, C, Robert, J, Jarlier, V, and Grosset, J. The bacteriology of tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis mycobacterial infections. Rev Mal Respir. (1997) 14:S33–48.

Google Scholar

94. Neuschlova, M, Vladarova, M, Kompanikova, J, Sadlonova, V, and Novakova, E. Identification of Mycobacterium species by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2017) 1021:37–42. doi: 10.1007/5584_2017_26

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Lotz, A, Ferroni, A, Beretti, J-L, Dauphin, B, Carbonnelle, E, Guet-Revillet, H, et al. Rapid identification of mycobacterial whole cells in solid and liquid culture media by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. (2010) 48:4481–6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01397-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Drobniewski, F, Cooke, M, Jordan, J, Casali, N, Mugwagwa, T, Broda, A, et al. Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of molecular diagnostic tests for antibiotic resistance in tuberculosis. Health Technol Assess. (2015) 19:1, 1–188. doi: 10.3310/hta19340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Barnard, M, Warren, R, Gey Van Pittius, N, van Helden, P, Bosman, M, Streicher, E, et al. Genotype MTBDRsl line probe assay shortens time to diagnosis of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-throughput diagnostic laboratory. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2012) 186:1298–305. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201205-0960OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Sougakoff, W. Molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2011) 17:800–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03577.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. World Health Organization. Companion handbook to the WHO guidelines for the programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Geneva: World Health Organization (2014).

Google Scholar

100. Boehme, CC, Nabeta, P, Hillemann, D, Nicol, MP, Shenai, S, Krapp, F, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. (2010) 363:1005–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Richardson, C, Redfern, A, Sher-Locketz, CL, Schubert, PT, and Schaaf, HS. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of peripheral lymph nodes in children: practical experience in a tertiary hospital. J Trop Pediatr. (2021) 67:fmaa040. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa040

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Kurumaji, Y, Katoh, T, Ohtaki, N, Tachibana, S, and Hashimoto, K. A case of secondary syphilis with a solitary pulmonary lesion. Dermatologica. (1987) 174:23–7. doi: 10.1159/000248975

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. El Jammal, T, Jamilloux, Y, Gerfaud-Valentin, M, Richard-Colmant, G, Weber, E, Bert, A, et al. Challenging mimickers in the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: a case study. Diagnostics (Basel). (2021) 11:1240. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Madan, K, Sryma, PB, Pattnaik, B, Mittal, S, Tiwari, P, Hadda, V, et al. Clinical profile of 327 patients with Sarcoidosis in India: an Ambispective cohort study in a tuberculosis (TB) endemic population. Lung India. (2022) 39:51–7. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_960_20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Ohshimo, S, Guzman, J, Costabel, U, and Bonella, F. Differential diagnosis of granulomatous lung disease: clues and pitfalls: number 4 in the series “pathology for the clinician” edited by Peter Dorfmüller and Alberto Cavazza. Eur Respir Rev. (2017) 26:170012. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0012-2017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Roberts, MB, Lee, J, Murphy, MC, Kim, AY, Coglianese, EE, and Hilburn, C. Case 37-2022: a 55-year-old man with fatigue, weight loss, and pulmonary nodules. N Engl J Med. (2022) 387:2172–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcpc2211357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Yamasue, M, Komiya, K, Usagawa, Y, Umeki, K, Nureki, S-I, Ando, M, et al. Factors associated with false negative interferon-γ release assay results in patients with tuberculosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:1607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58459-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Santos, JA, Duarte, R, and Nunes, C. Host factors associated to false negative and indeterminate results in an interferon-γ release assay in patients with active tuberculosis. Pulmonology. (2020) 26:353–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Wang, S-H, Chung, C-H, Huang, T-W, Tsai, W-C, Peng, C-K, Huang, K-L, et al. Bidirectional association between tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. Respirology. (2019) 24:467–74. doi: 10.1111/resp.13482

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Boumaza, A, Ben Azzouz, E, Arrindell, J, Lepidi, H, Mezouar, S, and Desnues, B. Whipple’s disease and Tropheryma whipplei infections: from bench to bedside. Lancet Infect Dis. (2022) 22:e280–91. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00128-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Guo, Y, Li, L, Li, Z, Sun, L, and Wang, H. Tropheryma whipplei detection by Nanopore sequencing in patients with interstitial lung disease. Front Microbiol. (2021) 12:760696. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.760696

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Mertz, P, Jeannel, J, Guffroy, A, Lescuyer, S, Korganow, AS, Rondeau-Lutz, M, et al. Granulomatous manifestations associated with COVID19 infection: is there a link between these two diseases? Autoimmun Rev. (2021) 20:102824. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Choi, HS. Pulmonary cryptococcosis after recovery from COVID-19 in an immunocompetent patient: a rare case report. Medicine (Baltimore). (2022) 101:e30143. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Casanova, NG, Gonzalez-Garay, ML, Sun, B, Bime, C, Sun, X, Knox, KS, et al. Differential transcriptomics in sarcoidosis lung and lymph node granulomas with comparisons to pathogen-specific granulomas. Respir Res. (2020) 21:321. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01537-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Kutsuzawa, T, Matsuura, Y, Sakuma, H, Narimatsu, H, Ohta, Y, and Yamabayashi, H. Multiple pulmonary nodules caused by zygomycosis in a patient without predisposing factors. Jpn J Med. (1991) 30:435–7. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine1962.30.435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Xie, Y, Luo, Y-R, Chen, M, Xie, Y-M, Sun, C-Y, and Chen, Q. Pleural lump after paragonimiasis treated by thoracoscopy: a case report. World J Clin Cases. (2021) 9:666–71. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i3.666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Ravaglia, C, Gurioli, C, Casoni, GL, Asioli, S, and Poletti, V. Fever, splenomegaly and lymphopenia in sarcoidosis. Visceral leishmaniasis. Thorax. (2013) 68:496–7. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Balmes, JR, Abraham, JL, Dweik, RA, Fireman, E, Fontenot, AP, Maier, LA, et al. An official American Thoracic Society statement: diagnosis and Management of Beryllium Sensitivity and Chronic Beryllium Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2014) 190:e34–59. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201409-1722ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. MacMurdo, MG, Mroz, MM, Culver, DA, Dweik, RA, and Maier, LA. Chronic beryllium disease: update on a moving target. Chest. (2020) 158:2458–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Müller-Quernheim, J, Gaede, KI, Fireman, E, and Zissel, G. Diagnoses of chronic beryllium disease within cohorts of sarcoidosis patients. Eur Respir J. (2006) 27:1190–5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00112205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Marchand-Adam, S, El Khatib, A, Guillon, F, Brauner, MW, Lamberto, C, Lepage, V, et al. Short- and long-term response to corticosteroid therapy in chronic beryllium disease. Eur Respir J. (2008) 32:687–93. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00149607

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Li, L, Silveira, LJ, Hamzeh, N, Gillespie, M, Mroz, PM, Mayer, AS, et al. Beryllium-induced lung disease exhibits expression profiles similar to sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J. (2016) 47:1797–808. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01469-2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Frye, BC, Quartucci, C, Rakete, S, Grubanovic, A, Höhne, K, Mangold, F, et al. A cluster of beryllium sensitization traced to the presence of beryllium in concrete dust. Chest. (2021) 159:1084–93. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. De Vuyst, P, Dumortier, P, Schandené, L, Estenne, M, Verhest, A, and Yernault, JC. Sarcoidlike lung granulomatosis induced by aluminum dusts. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1987) 135:493–7. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.2.493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Fireman, E, Shai, AB, Alcalay, Y, Ophir, N, Kivity, S, and Stejskal, V. Identification of metal sensitization in sarcoid-like metal-exposed patients by the MELISA® lymphocyte proliferation test - a pilot study. J Occup Med Toxicol. (2016) 11:18. doi: 10.1186/s12995-016-0101-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Tillie-Leblond, I, Grenouillet, F, Reboux, G, Roussel, S, Chouraki, B, Lorthois, C, et al. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and metalworking fluids contaminated by mycobacteria. Eur Respir J. (2011) 37:640–7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00195009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Soler, P, Nioche, S, Valeyre, D, Basset, F, Benveniste, J, Burtin, C, et al. Role of mast cells in the pathogenesis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Thorax. (1987) 42:565–72. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.8.565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Gundacker, ND, Gonzalez, JA, Sheinin, YM, and Hirschtritt, T. Hot tub lung: case report and review of the literature. WMJ. (2022) 121:E31–3.

Google Scholar

129. Marchiori, E, Zanetti, G, Mano, CM, Hochhegger, B, and Irion, KL. The reversed halo sign: another atypical manifestation of sarcoidosis. Korean J Radiol. (2010) 11:251–2. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.2.251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Cohen Aubart, F, Lhote, R, Amoura, A, Valeyre, D, Haroche, J, Amoura, Z, et al. Drug-induced sarcoidosis: an overview of the WHO pharmacovigilance database. J Intern Med. (2020) 288:356–62. doi: 10.1111/joim.12991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Spagnolo, P, Bonniaud, P, Rossi, G, Sverzellati, N, and Cottin, V. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J. (2022) 60:2102776. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02776-2021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Baughman, RP, Valeyre, D, Korsten, P, Mathioudakis, A, Wuyts, WA, Wells, A, et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of Sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J. (2021) 58:2004079. doi: 10.1183/13993003.04079-2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Theunssens, X, Bricman, L, Dierckx, S, Sapart, E, Sokolova, T, Avramovska, A, et al. Anti-TNF induced Sarcoidosis-like disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients: review cases from the RA UCLouvain Brussels cohort. Rheumatol Ther. (2022) 9:763–70. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00424-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Senabre-Gallego, JM, Santos-Ramírez, C, Santos-Soler, G, Salas-Heredia, E, Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M, Barber, X, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Patient Prefer Adherence. (2013) 7:961–72. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S33109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Kashima, S, Moriichi, K, Ando, K, Ueno, N, Tanabe, H, Yuzawa, S, et al. Development of pulmonary sarcoidosis in Crohn’s disease patient under infliximab biosimilar treatment after long-term original infliximab treatment: a case report and literature review. BMC Gastroenterol. (2021) 21:373. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01948-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Jamilloux, Y, Cohen-Aubart, F, Chapelon-Abric, C, Maucort-Boulch, D, Marquet, A, Pérard, L, et al. Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in refractory sarcoidosis: a multicenter study of 132 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2017) 47:288–94. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Rajoriya, N, Wotton, CJ, Yeates, DGR, Travis, SPL, and Goldacre, MJ. Immune-mediated and chronic inflammatory disease in people with sarcoidosis: disease associations in a large UK database. Postgrad Med J. (2009) 85:233–7. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.067769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Korsten, P, Tampe, B, Konig, MF, and Nikiphorou, E. Sarcoidosis and autoimmune diseases: differences, similarities and overlaps. Curr Opin Pulm Med. (2018) 24:504–12. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Bartelds, GM, Krieckaert, CLM, Nurmohamed, MT, van Schouwenburg, PA, Lems, WF, Twisk, JWR, et al. Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up. JAMA. (2011) 305:1460–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Moots, RJ, Xavier, RM, Mok, CC, Rahman, MU, Tsai, W-C, Al-Maini, MH, et al. Correction: The impact of anti-drug antibodies on drug concentrations and clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from a multinational, real-world clinical practice, non-interventional study. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0179308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179308

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Tissot, C, Carsin, A, Freymond, N, Pacheco, Y, and Devouassoux, G. Sarcoidosis complicating anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody biotherapy. Eur Respir J. (2013) 41:246–7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00107912

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Berthod, G, Lazor, R, Letovanec, I, Romano, E, Noirez, L, Mazza Stalder, J, et al. Pulmonary sarcoid-like granulomatosis induced by ipilimumab. J Clin Oncol. (2012) 30:e156–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.3298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Eckert, A, Schoeffler, A, Dalle, S, Phan, A, Kiakouama, L, and Thomas, L. Anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody induced sarcoidosis in a metastatic melanoma patient. Dermatology. (2009) 218:69–70. doi: 10.1159/000161122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Nandavaram, S, and Nadkarni, A. Ipilimumab-induced Sarcoidosis and thyroiditis. Am J Ther. (2018) 25:e379–80. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Ung, C, and Gragoudas, E. Checkpoint inhibitor-induced sarcoid choroidal granulomas. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. (2020) 18:100652. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Cotliar, J, Querfeld, C, Boswell, WJ, Raja, N, Raz, D, and Chen, R. Pembrolizumab-associated sarcoidosis. JAAD Case Rep. (2016) 2:290–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Danlos, F-X, Pagès, C, Baroudjian, B, Vercellino, L, Battistella, M, Mimoun, M, et al. Nivolumab-induced Sarcoid-like granulomatous reaction in a patient with advanced melanoma. Chest. (2016) 149:e133–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.10.082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Mitchell, MA, Hogan, K, and Amjadi, K. Atezolizumab-induced sarcoid-like granulomatous reaction in a patient with urothelial cell carcinoma. Immunotherapy. (2018) 10:1189–92. doi: 10.2217/imt-2018-0035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Rousseau, PM, Raimbourg, J, Robert, M, Dansette, D, Dréno, B, and Peuvrel, L. Supported by GESTIM Nantes group of cutaneous adverse events induced by cancer treatments. First case of cutaneous sarcoidosis within tattoos under durvalumab. Int J Dermatol. (2019) 58:e168–70. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Tun Min, S, Nordman, IIC, and Tran, HA. Hypercalcaemia due to Sarcoidosis during treatment with Avelumab for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Case Rep Oncol. (2019) 12:639–43. doi: 10.1159/000502285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Haanen, JBAG, Carbonnel, F, Robert, C, Kerr, KM, Peters, S, Larkin, J, et al. ESMO guidelines committee. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. (2017) 28:iv119–42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Cabanié, C, Ammari, S, Hans, S, Pobel, C, Laparra, A, Danlos, F-X, et al. Outcomes of patients with cancer and sarcoid-like granulomatosis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case-control study. Eur J Cancer. (2021) 156:46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Chorti, E, Kanaki, T, Zimmer, L, Hadaschik, E, Ugurel, S, Gratsias, E, et al. Drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction in adjuvant immunotherapy: increased rate and mimicker of metastasis. Eur J Cancer. (2020) 131:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Lheure, C, Kramkimel, N, Franck, N, Laurent-Roussel, S, Carlotti, A, Queant, A, et al. Sarcoidosis in patients treated with Vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma: a paradoxical autoimmune activation. Dermatology. (2015) 231:378–84. doi: 10.1159/000439400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Jansen, YJ, Janssens, P, Hoorens, A, Schreuer, MS, Seremet, T, Wilgenhof, S, et al. Granulomatous nephritis and dermatitis in a patient with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic melanoma treated with dabrafenib and trametinib. Melanoma Res. (2015) 25:550–4. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Assan, F, Schlemmer, F, Assie, J-B, Mahevas, M, Sustronck, P, Ortonne, N, et al. Atypical systemic sarcoid-like granulomatosis in two patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Eur J Dermatol. (2019) 29:556–7. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2019.3640

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Rabe, J, Neff, KW, Lehmann, KJ, Mechtersheimer, U, and Georgi, M. Miliary tuberculosis after intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy for carcinoma of the bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1999) 172:748–50. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.3.10063874

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Jasmer, RM, McCowin, MJ, and Webb, WR. Miliary lung disease after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy. Radiology. (1996) 201:43–4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816518

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Lamm, DL, Stogdill, VD, Stogdill, BJ, and Crispen, RG. Complications of bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy in 1,278 patients with bladder cancer. J Urol. (1986) 135:272–4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45606-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Agrawal, A, Sahni, S, Vulisha, AK, Gumpeni, R, Shah, R, and Talwar, A. Pulmonary manifestations of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Respir Med. (2017) 128:65–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.05.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Haramati, LB, Lee, G, Singh, A, Molina, PL, and White, CS. Newly diagnosed pulmonary Sarcoidosis in HIV-infected patients. Radiology. (2001) 218:242–6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja25242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Abu Shtaya, A, Cohen, S, Kogan, Y, Shteinberg, M, and Sagool, O. Crohn’s disease with atypical extra-intestinal manifestations developing under treatment with Vedolizumab. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. (2021) 8:002265. doi: 10.12890/2021_002265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Parisinos, CA, Lees, CW, Wallace, W, and Satsangi, J. Sarcoidosis complicating treatment with natalizumab for Crohn’s disease. Thorax. (2011) 66:1109–10. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.155762

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Dhalla, F, Lochlainn, DJM, Chapel, H, and Patel, SY. Histology of interstitial lung disease in common variable immune deficiency. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:605187. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.605187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Bode, SFN, Rohr, J, Müller Quernheim, J, Seidl, M, Speckmann, C, and Heinzmann, A. Pulmonary granulomatosis of genetic origin. Eur Respir Rev. (2021) 30:200152. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0152-2020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Salvator, H, Mahlaoui, N, Catherinot, E, Rivaud, E, Pilmis, B, Borie, R, et al. Pulmonary manifestations in adult patients with chronic granulomatous disease. Eur Respir J. (2015) 45:1613–23. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00118414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Matsuda, T, Kambe, N, Ueki, Y, Kanazawa, N, Izawa, K, Honda, Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment of 50 cases of Blau syndrome in Japan confirmed by genetic analysis of the NOD2 mutation. Ann Rheum Dis. (2020) 79:1492–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Wouters, CH, Maes, A, Foley, KP, Bertin, J, and Rose, CD. Blau syndrome, the prototypic auto-inflammatory granulomatous disease. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. (2014) 12:33. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-12-33

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Becker, ML, Martin, TM, Doyle, TM, and Rosé, CD. Interstitial pneumonitis in Blau syndrome with documented mutation in CARD15. Arthritis Rheum. (2007) 56:1292–4. doi: 10.1002/art.22509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

170. Besnard, V, Calender, A, Bouvry, D, Pacheco, Y, Chapelon-Abric, C, Jeny, F, et al. G908R NOD2 variant in a family with sarcoidosis. Respir Res. (2018) 19:44. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0748-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

171. Robson, JC, Grayson, PC, Ponte, C, Suppiah, R, Craven, A, Judge, A, et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of associations for rheumatology classification criteria for granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2022) 81:315–20. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

172. Rosen, Y. Four decades of necrotizing sarcoid granulomatosis: what do we know now? Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2015) 139:252–62. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0051-RA

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

173. Abehsera, M, Valeyre, D, Grenier, P, Jaillet, H, Battesti, JP, and Brauner, MW. Sarcoidosis with pulmonary fibrosis: CT patterns and correlation with pulmonary function. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2000) 174:1751–7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741751

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

174. Casey, MB, Tazelaar, HD, Myers, JL, Hunninghake, GW, Kakar, S, Kalra, SX, et al. Noninfectious lung pathology in patients with Crohn’s disease. Am J Surg Pathol. (2003) 27:213–9. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200302000-00010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

175. Lu, D-G, Ji, X-Q, Zhao, Q, Zhang, C-Q, and Li, Z-F. Tracheobronchial nodules and pulmonary infiltrates in a patient with Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. (2012) 18:5653–7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

176. Terwiel, M, Grutters, JC, and van Moorsel, CHM. Clustering of immune-mediated diseases in sarcoidosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. (2019) 25:539–53. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

177. Butt, S, Alzebdeh, R, Kable, TD, and Soubani, AO. Non-caseating granulomas in patients after the diagnosis of cancer: clinical characteristics and outcome. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. (2011) 28:44–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

178. Robert, C, Schoenlaub, P, Avril, MF, Lok, C, Grosshans, E, Valeyre, D, et al. Malignant melanoma and granulomatosis. Br J Dermatol. (1997) 137:787–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.19542042.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

179. Alzghoul, BN, Zayed, Y, Obeidat, A, Alzghoul, B, Naser, A, Shilbayeh, A-R, et al. Clinical characteristics of Sarcoidosis patients with self-reported lymphoma: a US Nationwide registry study. Lung. (2021) 199:611–8. doi: 10.1007/s00408-021-00485-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

180. Matsuo, T, Tanaka, T, Omote, R, Okada, T, Notohara, K, and Okada, K. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the course of systemic sarcoidosis: a case report and review of 30 Japanese patients with sarcoidosis-lymphoma syndrome. J Clin Exp Hematop. (2022) 62:226–37. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.22015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

181. Brincker, H. The sarcoidosis-lymphoma syndrome. Br J Cancer. (1986) 54:467–73. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1986.199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

182. London, J, Grados, A, Fermé, C, Charmillon, A, Maurier, F, Deau, B, et al. Sarcoidosis occurring after lymphoma: report of 14 patients and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). (2014) 93:e121. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

183. Melani, C, Jaffe, ES, and Wilson, WH. Pathobiology and treatment of lymphomatoid granulomatosis, a rare EBV-driven disorder. Blood. (2020) 135:1344–52. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

184. Grenier, P, Chevret, S, Beigelman, C, Brauner, MW, Chastang, C, and Valeyre, D. Chronic diffuse infiltrative lung disease: determination of the diagnostic value of clinical data, chest radiography, and CT and Bayesian analysis. Radiology. (1994) 191:383–90. doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.2.8153310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sarcoidosis, differential diagnosis, granuloma, tuberculosis, thoracic computed tomography, pathology, microbiology

Citation: Valeyre D, Brauner M, Bernaudin J-F, Carbonnelle E, Duchemann B, Rotenberg C, Berger I, Martin A, Nunes H, Naccache J-M and Jeny F (2023) Differential diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis: a review. Front. Med. 10:1150751. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1150751

Received: 24 January 2023; Accepted: 24 April 2023;
Published: 12 May 2023.

Edited by:

Giuseppe Fiorentino, Hospital of the Hills, Italy

Reviewed by:

Qiao Ye, Capital Medical University, China
Serena Vettori, Monaldi Hospital, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Valeyre, Brauner, Bernaudin, Carbonnelle, Duchemann, Rotenberg, Berger, Martin, Nunes, Naccache and Jeny. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Florence Jeny, ZmxvcmVuY2UuamVueUBhcGhwLmZy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.