95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Gareth Corbett1
Peter Pugh2
Jurgen Herre3Teik Choon See4David de Monteverde-Robb5
Rafael Torrejon Torres6
Rhodri Saunders6Catherine Leonard7
Amit Prakash8*- 1Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 2Department of Cardiology, Cambridge University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 3Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 4Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 5Department of Pharmacy, Cambridge University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 6Health Economics, Coreva Scientific, Koenigswinter, Germany
- 7Health Economics, Medtronic UK Ltd., Watford, United Kingdom
- 8Department of Anaesthesia, Cambridge University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
A corrigendum on
Service evaluation of the impact of capnography on the safety of procedural sedation
by Corbett, G., Pugh, P., Herre, J., See, T. C., de Monteverde-Robb, D., Torrejon Torres, R., Saunders, R., Leonard, C., and Prakash, A. (2022). Front. Med. 9:867536. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.867536
In the published article, there was an error.
A correction has been made to the Conclusion. This sentence previously stated:
“The incidence of adverse events was significantly reduced by 53.2% (p <0.05).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The incidence of adverse events was significantly reduced by 43.2% (p <0.05).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: safe sedation practice, monitoring, respiratory compromise, endoscopy, bronchoscopy, patient safety
Citation: Corbett G, Pugh P, Herre J, See TC, de Monteverde-Robb D, Torrejon Torres R, Saunders R, Leonard C and Prakash A (2022) Corrigendum: Service evaluation of the impact of capnography on the safety of procedural sedation. Front. Med. 9:999862. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.999862
Received: 21 July 2022; Accepted: 22 July 2022;
Published: 05 August 2022.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2022 Corbett, Pugh, Herre, See, de Monteverde-Robb, Torrejon Torres, Saunders, Leonard and Prakash. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Amit Prakash, YW1pdC5wcmFrYXNoQGFkZGVuYnJvb2tlcy5uaHMudWs=