Marlies Wijsenbeek
Joyce S. Lee
Zarir Udwadia3
Michael Kreuter- 1Centre of Excellence for Interstitial Lung Diseases and Sarcoidosis, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC), University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 2Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
- 3Hinduja Hospital and Research Center, Mumbai, India
- 4Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases & Interdisciplinary Sarcoidosis Expert Center, Pneumology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- 5German Center for Lung Research (TLRC), Heidelberg, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
Interstitial Lung Disease Around the World
Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) comprise a broad spectrum of diseases, with different underlying pathophysiology, disease behavior, and outcomes. For the most prevalent forms of ILD such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, international guidelines have been developed and are updated regularly to promote uniformity of diagnosis and treatment, and to enable collaborative research efforts (1–4). However, even for these well-defined diseases, heterogeneity exists in prevalence, disease behavior and outcomes around the world [hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.751181Kaul et al.; (5–8)]. There are still many unknowns about the impact of geography on these diseases. As many ILDs are thought to originate from an external—often perpetuating—stimulus in a susceptible host, it is likely that environmental and genetic factors explain some of these differences (9). Furthermore, access to diagnosis, care and treatment options also impact disease recognition, outcome, and health related quality of life, which contributes to some notable differences throughout the world (10–14).
Although great advances have been made in recent years on understanding the pathogenesis and advancing the treatment of fibrotic ILDs and ultra-rare ILDs, only a limited part of the world has yet benefitted from these advances. Furthermore, many clinical trials as well as translational studies suffer from a lack of diversity in their study population, with a predominance of Caucasian males from the northern hemisphere included in most studies (13). Fortunately, there have been increasing efforts to expand this narrow scope. First, pharmaceutical companies are now including a broader scope of countries in their clinical trials. For example, when looking at IPF, the CAPACITY trials ran in 13 countries in Europe, Australia and North America, the INPULSIS trials in 24 countries in the Americas, Europe, Asia and Australia, and the ISABELA studies in 26 countries and covering all continents (15–17). Second, academic societies are promoting international collaborations (18). Finally, digital collaborations and communication, accelerated in part by the pandemic, have stimulated surveying and meeting people around the world about their practices and perspectives in different fields of ILD [hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.699644Polke et al.; (19)]. We hope that these developments will result in more insights about potential pathogenetic differences and disease behavior in ILDs around the world, in addition to promoting access to diagnosis and treatment, especially for middle- and low-income countries.
Whilst prevention of ILD and reducing exposure to potential causative agents is crucial, this is a complex field. On one hand, country and even location specific interventions are necessary, whilst on the other hand, cross border agreements are crucial to reduce the important factor of air pollution (10, 20, 21). The pulmonary field should keep raising its united voice on the impact of air pollution on lung health. Meanwhile, international collaborative efforts with simple interventions could potentially have great impact, such as initiatives aimed at reducing household air pollution by supplying improved cookstoves (22).
Even though we all acknowledge the need for a more inclusive research field and more equality in access to care and treatment around the world, this is easier said than done. Barriers for conducting clinical trials include lack of financial and human capacity, ethical and regulatory obstacles, operational barriers and competing demands (23). In this issue, we aimed to achieve greater insights into the difference and similarities in ILD around the world by encouraging people from all over the world to submit their research in ILD. Furthermore, we wished to promote cross border collaborations between scientists and clinicians. This has resulted in 11 manuscripts on varying topics in ILD, written by 103 authors from 33 countries.
The manuscript of hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.751181Kaul et al. describes the heterogeneity of ILD around the world by comparing 17 different epidemiological studies from all over the world. They demonstrate that hypersensitivity pneumonitis is more prevalent in Asia, and particularly in India, whilst in North America and Europe, IPF and sarcoidosis are more prevalent. They discuss the potential reasons and unknowns underlying such differences and call for organization of the ILD research community to develop a shared ontology for disease and collaborative epidemiological studies. That such projects are needed, but will be challenging, is further illustrated by four different studies presented in this ILD around the world issue.
These four studies illustrate that access to diagnosis and treatment, as well as disease phenotype may well-depend on the place you live. The work of van de Sar in collaboration with the European Pulmonary Fibrosis and related disorders federation, showed large differences in diagnostic access that exist between European countries (hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.711194van der Sar et al.). Data from the well-known EMPIRE registry, comprising 10 central and eastern European countries, show clear differences in access to therapy as well as patient characteristics in a group of nearly 2,500 patients with IPF (hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.729203Kolonics-Farkas et al.). hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.699644Polke et al. surveyed 509 pulmonologists from 66 countries on prevention, diagnosis and treatment strategies of acute exacerbations of IPF, which yielded insights into similarities and differences across the world. Their effort also highlights the potential for large international surveys to guide future study design. Last, hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.679487Gonzalez-Garcia et al. in four Latin American countries demonstrated the potential effect of living at high altitude on co-morbidities for patients with IPF, which supports the need for tailored diagnostic protocols depending on geography.
Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important outcome in the care of patients with ILD and is particularly influenced by an individual's cultural and spiritual background and values. Aronson and Suzuki provide an important and comprehensive overview of the global influences on HRQOL assessment and the different tools that exist to assess HRQOL around the world (hrefhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.745908Aronson and Suzuki). They also identify gaps and provide recommendations for improving HRQOL assessment across the world in ILD.
The research in this issue provides some, even if small, steps forward in our knowledge of ILD around the world. Moreover, we hope that this issue has accelerated new contacts and collaborations throughout the world. We are convinced that expanding our cross-continental networks will lead to more inclusive and conclusive research, which in the end will lead to better care for patients with ILD around the world.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, Myers JL, Kreuter M, Vasakova M, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults. An official ATS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2020) 202:e36–e69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-2032ST
2. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DJ, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2018) 198:e44–68. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST
3. Baughman RP, Valeyre D, Korsten P, Mathioudakis AG, Wuyts WA, Wells A, et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J. (2021) 58:2004079. doi: 10.1183/13993003.04079-2020
4. Thillai M, Atkins CP, Crawshaw A, Hart SP, Ho LP, Kouranos V, et al. BTS Clinical statement on pulmonary sarcoidosis. Thorax. (2021) 76:4–20. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214348
5. Singh S, Bairwa M, Collins BF, Sharma BB, Joshi JM, Talwar D, et al. Survival predictors of interstitial lung disease in India: follow-up of Interstitial Lung Disease India registry. Lung India. (2021) 38:5–11. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_414_20
6. Singh S, Collins BF, Sharma BB, Joshi JM, Talwar D, Katiyar S, et al. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: clinical manifestations - prospective data from the interstitial lung disease-India registry. Lung India. (2019) 36:476–82. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_263_19
7. Olson A, Hartmann N, Patnaik P, Wallace L, Schlenker-Herceg R, Nasser M, et al. Estimation of the prevalence of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: systematic literature review and data from a physician survey. Adv Ther. (2020) 38:854–67. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01578-6
8. Olson AL, Gifford AH, Inase N, Fernández Pérez ER, Suda T. The epidemiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung diseases at risk of a progressive-fibrosing phenotype. Eur Respir Rev. (2018) 27:180077. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0077-2018
9. Wijsenbeek M, Cottin V. Spectrum of fibrotic lung diseases. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:958–68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2005230
10. Liu L. China's dusty lung crisis: rural-urban health inequity as social and spatial injustice. Soc Sci Med. (2019) 233:218–28. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.033
11. Bonella F, Wijsenbeek M, Molina-Molina M, Duck A, Mele R, Geissler K, et al. European IPF Patient Charter: unmet needs and a call to action for healthcare policymakers. Eur Respir J. (2016) 47:597–606. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01204-2015
12. Fleming KA, Horton S, Wilson ML, Atun R, DeStigter K, Flanigan J, et al. The Lancet Commission on diagnostics: transforming access to diagnostics. Lancet. (2021) 398:1997–2050. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00673-5
13. Jalbert AC, Siafa L, Ramanakumar AV, Assayag D. Gender and racial equity in clinical research for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. (2022) 2102969. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02969-2021. [Epub ahead of print].
14. Udwadia ZF, Richeldi L. Interstitial lung disease in india. keep searching and you'll keep finding. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2017) 195:714–5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2019ED
15. Noble PW, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Glassberg MK, Kardatzke D, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CAPACITY): two randomised trials. Lancet. (2011) 377:1760–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60405-4
16. Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, et al. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. (2014) 370:2071–82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402584
17. Maher TM, Kreuter M, Lederer DJ, Brown KK, Wuyts W, Verbruggen N, et al. Rationale, design and objectives of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies of GLPG1690, a novel autotaxin inhibitor, in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ISABELA 1 and 2). BMJ Open Respir Res. (2019) 6:e000422. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000422
18. van den Berge M, Genton C, Heuvelin E, Simonds AK, Humbert M, Nyberg A, et al. Success and continuous growth of the ERS clinical research collaborations. Eur Respir J. (2021) 58:2102527. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02527-2021
19. Nakshbandi G, Moor CC, Johannson KA, Maher TM, Kreuter M, Wijsenbeek MS. Worldwide experiences and opinions of healthcare providers on eHealth for patients with interstitial lung diseases in the COVID-19 era. ERJ Open Res. (2021) 7:00405-2021. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00405-2021
20. Knight D, Ehrlich R, Cois A, Fielding K, Grant AD, Churchyard G. Predictors of silicosis and variation in prevalence across mines among employed gold miners in South Africa. BMC Public Health. (2020) 20:829. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08876-2
21. Avitzur N, Noth EM, Lamidi M, Nathan SD, Collard HR, DeDent AM, et al. Relative environmental and social disadvantage in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax. (2021) thoraxjnl-2021-217652. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217652. [Epub ahead of print].
22. Thakur M, Nuyts PAW, Boudewijns EA, Flores Kim J, Faber T, Babu GR, et al. Impact of improved cookstoves on women's and child health in low and middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. (2018) 73:1026–40. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210952
Keywords: Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, inequality in access to healthcare, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF), air pollution, occupational and environmental exposure
Citation: Wijsenbeek M, Lee JS, Udwadia Z and Kreuter M (2022) Editorial: Interstitial Lung Disease Around the World. Front. Med. 9:865334. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.865334
Received: 29 January 2022; Accepted: 14 February 2022;
Published: 18 March 2022.
Edited by:
Argyrios Tzouvelekis, Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center, GreeceReviewed by:
Vincent Cottin, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, FranceCopyright © 2022 Wijsenbeek, Lee, Udwadia and Kreuter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marlies Wijsenbeek, bS53aWpzZW5iZWVrLWxvdXJlbnMmI3gwMDA0MDtlcmFzbXVzbWMubmw=