Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med., 03 March 2022
Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecological Surgery
This article is part of the Research Topic Women in Obstetrics and Gynecology View all 32 articles

Prevalence of Psychosomatic and Genitourinary Syndrome Among Menopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

\nNik Hussain Nik HazlinaNik Hussain Nik Hazlina1Mohd Noor Norhayati
Mohd Noor Norhayati2*Ismail Shaiful BahariIsmail Shaiful Bahari2Nik Ahmad Nik Muhammad ArifNik Ahmad Nik Muhammad Arif1
  • 1Women's Health Development Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
  • 2Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia

Introduction: The menopausal transition represents the passage from reproductive to non-reproductive life and is characterized by a number of menstrual disturbances. We systematically reviewed the evidence on the prevalence of psychosomatic and genitourinary syndrome among menopausal women and compared the risk of symptoms between premenopausal, perimenopausal, and post-menopausal women.

Methods: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect through March 2021. Case series/reports, conference papers and proceedings, articles available only in abstract form, editorial reviews, letters of communication, commentaries, systematic reviews, and qualitative studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed the quality of data using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis. The outcomes were assessed with random-effects model using the Review Manager software.

Results: In total, 29 studies had a low risk of bias and were included in the review. Our findings showed that the pooled prevalence of somatic symptoms in post-menopausal women (52.6%) was higher than in the premenopausal and perimenopausal stages (34.6 and 39.5%, respectively). There was a low prevalence of psychological symptoms in premenopausal women (28.4%). The genitourinary syndrome was highest among post-menopausal women (55.1%), followed by perimenopausal (31.9%) and premenopausal (19.2%) women.

Conclusion: Post-menopausal women have a higher risk of experiencing menopausal symptoms particularly genitourinary syndrome than premenopausal and perimenopausal women. It is pertinent for healthcare professionals to evaluate the symptoms in order to provide them with a better quality of life.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021235958

Introduction

Natural menopause occurs at a median age of 51 years in Western societies and is assumed to be caused by ovarian follicle exhaustion (1). Based on the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) criteria, menopause is defined as 12 or more months of amenorrhea following the final menstrual period (2). Perimenopause is defined as the onset of a varied cycle duration (early stage), two or more missing periods, and at least 2 months of amenorrhea (late-stage) (2). As the population ages, a growing proportion of women are living decades after menopause. At menopause, about 80% of women have vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as hot flushes and night sweats, and about 20% find them bothersome enough to seek therapy (3).

Menopause is defined as the permanent cessation of menstruation resulting from the loss of ovarian follicular activity. Natural menopause is recognized to have occurred after 12 consecutive months of amenorrhea, for which there is no other obvious pathological or physiological cause. Menopause occurs with the final menstrual period which is known with certainty only in retrospect a year or more after the event. Perimenopause should include the time immediately prior to the menopause (when the endocrinological, biological and clinical features of approaching menopause commence) and the first year after menopause. The term premenopause is often used ambiguously, either to refer to the 1 or 2 years immediately before the menopause or to refer to the whole of the reproductive period prior to the menopause. The group recommended that the term be used consistently in the latter sense to encompass the entire reproductive period up to the final menstrual period. Post-menopause is defined as dating from the final menstrual period, regardless of whether the menopause was induced or spontaneous (4).

Methods for determining when perimenopause begins (5), and a distinct set of STRAW criteria was developed (2). A variety of menstruation disturbances characterize the menopausal transition. The VMS is a common occurrence, sometimes accompanied by psychosomatic symptoms such as mood swings, anxiety, stress, and genitourinary syndrome of menopause. This includes genital symptoms such as dryness, burning, and irritation, as well as sexual symptoms such as lack of lubrication, discomfort or pain, poor function, and urinary symptoms such as urgency, dysuria, and recurrent urinary tract infections (6). All these symptoms have a significantly negative impact on the quality of life of many women (7). The menopausal transition can be a difficult time in a woman's life when it comes to healthy aging. These distressing symptoms do not affect all middle-aged women. During the menopausal transition, a third of women do not report any problems. Another third has mild to moderate symptoms, and the remaining third has moderate to severe symptoms that necessitate therapy (8).

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of psychosomatic and genitourinary syndrome among menopausal women. It helps to understand the symptoms better and serves as a basis for more appropriate countermeasures to this natural phenomenon. This updated review could be used in primary preventative care to help patients control and prevent diseases that harm their quality of life and mental health.

Materials and Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the prevalence of psychosomatic and genitourinary syndrome among menopausal women. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (9) and registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42021235958).

Search Strategy and Eligibility Criteria

We (N.A.N.M.A., N.H.N.H.) performed a systematic search in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and ScienceDirect using the search terms “psycholog*,” “mental,” “anxiety,” “depression,” “stress,” and “menopaus*.” These terms were adaptable to the different electronic databases. To determine their eligibility for inclusion in this study, all studies published from the beginning of the databases until March 2021 were retrieved. The search was limited to full-text articles written in English. The reference lists of the listed citations were cross-checked to locate other potentially eligible research.

The inclusion criteria were studies that reported the prevalence of psychosomatic and genitourinary syndrome among menopausal women. In this review, the definitions of premenopausal, perimenopausal and post-menopausal were as defined by the researchers in their studies. Studies with cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort designs published in English and conducted in the community or at a health institution level were included. Case series/reports, conference papers and proceedings, articles available only in abstract form, letters of communication, editorial reviews, systemic reviews, commentaries, and qualitative studies were excluded.

Study Selection and Quality Assessment

All the records identified using our search strategy were exported to EndNote X8 software (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA). Duplicate articles were removed. To determine their appropriateness, the entire texts of the relevant research were obtained and thoroughly examined. A consensus discussion was held between the two reviewers (N.A.N.M.A., N.H.N.H.) in the event of a conflict, and a third reviewer (M.N.N.) was consulted. The search method is presented in the PRISMA flowchart, which shows the studies that were included and excluded with reasons for their exclusion (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flowchart showing the studies on psychosomatic and genitourinary syndrome among menopausal women.

To examine the data quality, a critical assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies (10). Two reviewers (N.A.N.M.A., N.H.N.H.) performed independent bias evaluations. When more than 70% of the answers were “yes,” the risk of bias was considered low, moderate when 50–69% of the answers were “yes,” and high when up to 49% of the answers were “yes.” This review omitted studies that had a moderate or high risk of bias.

Data Extraction Process and Statistical Analysis

Two reviewers (N.A.N.M.A., N.H.N.H.) independently extracted the data using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA). The process included the first author, publication year, study design and setting, study location, study population, sample size, psychological impact, menopausal definition, and data in calculating the effect estimates for psychosomatic and genitourinary symptoms. In the event that disagreement occurred, it was dissolved by discussion between the two review authors or by the third author (M.N.N.).

The results were presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.4 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). A random-effects model was employed to pool the data. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity using the following guidelines: 0–40% may not be significant, 30–60% may represent moderate heterogeneity, 50–90% may represent substantial heterogeneity, and 75–100% may indicate significant heterogeneity (11). A subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of the study location (developed and developing countries) and comorbidities (presence or absence thereof) if an adequate number of studies were available. If publication bias was suspected, funnel plots and Egger's test were performed, with a p-value of <0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results

Study Characteristics

Through the electronic search, a total of 3,715 articles were identified, and 2,876 articles were found to be eligible after duplicate records were removed. A further 2,717 articles were excluded based on their titles or abstracts. The full texts of 159 articles were searched. Subsequently, 128 articles were excluded: 40 did not present the main outcomes, 41 had no outcomes of interest, 28 studies reported the outcomes in an unusable format, 12 were review articles, and seven were performed among different populations. Thirty-one studies underwent quality assessments, of which two had a moderate or high risk of bias and were excluded. The remaining 29 articles had a low risk of bias. Of these, 28 were cross-sectional studies, and one was a cohort. A quantitative assessment was then performed (Figure 1).

The women in the included studies were generally recruited from the general population or those who attended health clinics or gynecology clinics before starting treatment of menopausal complaints. They were not on treatment for menopausal symptoms except for a few studies that had <10% of the samples on hormone replacement therapy (1216). One study reported that in all menopausal groups, women who used HRT did not differ from non-users in having at least one bothersome symptom (17).

Different countries were included in this review. Four studies were conducted in Spain (15, 16, 18, 19), two each in Ecuador (13, 20), Turkey (21, 22), Korea (23, 24), and China (25, 26), and one each in India (27), Bangladesh (28), Saudi Arabia (29), the United States (30), Oman (31), Africa (32), Finland (17), Israel (33), Japan (34), Russia (35), Chile (36), Brazil (37), Poland (38), Italy (39), Nepal (40), Singapore (14), and Jordan (12). The smallest sample size was 187 (27) and the largest 2,886 (34). Overall, this study included 21,375 women (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of the research articles included in the systematic review and meta-analysis on menopause (n = 29).

Prevalence of Premenopausal, Perimenopausal, and Post-menopausal Women

Twenty-two studies were included in the estimation of the prevalence of premenopausal women. A wide range was observed, from 8.2% (30) to 69.4% (12). The overall pooled prevalence of premenopausal women was 35.5% (95% CI: 29.57, 41.43; Figure 2). The prevalence of perimenopausal women was estimated from 26 studies and ranged from 2.55% (15) to 66.81% (32). The pooled prevalence was 24.18% (95% CI: 19.46, 28.90; Figure 3). The prevalence of post-menopausal women was derived from 28 studies and ranged from 11.3% (13) to 76.80% (23). The pooled prevalence was 45.49% (95% CI: 38.26, 52.72; Figure 4). Egger's test showed significant publication bias for premenopausal (P = 0.026), perimenopausal (P < 0.001), and postmenopausal (P = 0.014) women.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Forest plot of the prevalence of premenopausal women.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Forest plot of the prevalence of perimenopausal women.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Forest plot of the prevalence of post-menopausal women.

Prevalence of Symptoms Among Menopausal Women

The Menopause Rating Scale was used to determine the prevalence of menopausal symptoms, which comprises 11 items divided into three subscales: (a) somatic symptoms: hot flashes, cardiac symptoms, sleep disturbances, and joint and muscle discomfort; (b) psychological symptoms: depressive mood, irritability, anxiety, and physical and mental exhaustion; and (c) genitourinary syndrome: sexual problems, bladder problems, and vaginal dryness.

Table 2 shows the percentage of women who experienced symptoms according to the menopausal stage. Somatic symptoms in post-menopausal women were higher (52.6%) compared to the premenopausal and perimenopausal stages (34.6 and 39.5%, respectively). The prevalence of psychological symptoms in premenopausal women was low (28.4%) but nearly the same among post-menopausal (49.4%) and perimenopausal (42.1%) women. The prevalence of genitourinary syndrome was different in all three groups: the highest prevalence was among post-menopausal women (55.1%), followed by perimenopausal (31.9%) and premenopausal (19.2%) women.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The prevalence of symptoms among menopausal women according to menopausal stage.

In terms of somatic symptoms, post-menopausal women had the highest prevalence (52.6%) of hot flashes, which were present in 34.6% of premenopausal and 39.5% of perimenopausal women. The prevalence of cardiac symptoms and sleep disturbances was <50% across all three menopausal phases. Meanwhile, for joint and muscle discomfort, post-menopausal women had the highest prevalence (69.9%).

Among the psychological symptoms, perimenopausal women had the highest prevalence of depressive mood (51.9%) and anxiety (54.6%), followed by post-menopausal and then premenopausal women. The prevalence of irritability and physical and mental exhaustion was highest among post-menopausal women at 51.7 and 52.2%, respectively. Post-menopausal women had the highest prevalence of genitourinary syndrome: 56.1% had sexual problems, 62.1% had bladder problems, and 39.9% had vaginal dryness.

Comparison of Symptoms Between Premenopausal and Perimenopausal Women

Symptoms between premenopausal and perimenopausal women were compared using the Menopause Rating Scale. For somatic symptoms, there were significant differences in the occurrence of hot flashes (OR: 4.16; 95% CI: 2.15, 8.02), cardiac symptoms (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.76), and sleep disturbances (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.01) between the groups, but no difference for joint and muscle discomfort (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 0.04, 58.31). There were no significant differences in psychological symptoms aside from physical and mental exhaustion, where the prevalence was higher among perimenopausal than premenopausal women (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.33, 3.58). For genitourinary syndrome, a significant difference was only apparent for sexual problems (OR: 9.62; 95% CI: 5.87, 15.76).

Comparison of Symptoms Between Premenopausal and Post-menopausal Women

A comparison of somatic symptoms between premenopausal and post-menopausal women showed a significant difference for all four symptoms. The odds of experiencing hot flashes were 4.72 (95% CI: 1.99, 11.21) times higher among post-menopausal than premenopausal women. The findings were similar for cardiac symptoms (OR: 4.66; 95% CI: 1.28, 16.92), sleep disturbances (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.84, 2.73), and joint and muscle discomfort (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.68, 2.57). In terms of psychological symptoms, anxiety was the only symptom showing no significant difference between the women (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.92). There was a significant difference for the rest of the symptoms; namely, depression (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.76), irritability (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.12, 4.23), and physical and mental exhaustion (OR: 4.07; 95% CI: 1.45, 11.44), while for the genitourinary syndrome, there was a significant difference for sexual (OR: 9.01; 95% CI: 4.68, 17.36) and bladder problems (OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.75, 4.23).

Comparison of Symptoms Between Perimenopausal and Post-menopausal Women

In the comparison of symptoms between perimenopausal and post-menopausal women, sleep disturbances were the only somatic symptom showing a significant difference (OR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.92) in favor of perimenopausal women. Among the psychological symptoms, physical and mental exhaustion was the only symptom for which there was a significant difference (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.83). Lastly, in terms of the genitourinary syndrome, there was only a significant difference for bladder problems (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.62).

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of psychosomatic and genitourinary syndrome among menopausal women. In this meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of premenopausal, perimenopausal, and post-menopausal women was 35.5, 24.18, and 45.49%, respectively. The wide range of prevalence for each of the three menopausal stages was due to the different study settings, where 21 (12, 13, 15, 16, 1824, 27, 2931, 3640) studies were conducted in medical centers, and eight (14, 17, 25, 28, 3235) were in the community. Methodological techniques such as sampling methods and tools, together with study implementation may also account for differences in estimated prevalence among studies.

In subscale of somatic symptoms, the prevalence of hot flashes is 24–93% among post-menopausal women, with the symptoms varying from mild to severe in the general population (41). The first 2 years after menopause are when hot flashes are most common, but they can last for years: 64% of women have reported symptoms lasting for 5 years, 26% for 10 years, and 10% for more than 10 years (42). Comparison between perimenopausal and post-menopausal women had nearly the same prevalence (52.9 and 59.7%, respectively). Notably, the odds of having hot flashes during perimenopause and post-menopause increased about four times compared to during premenopause. Menopausal symptoms emerge early in the premenopausal stage, even before monthly irregularities appear (43). Menopausal symptoms were seen in young premenopausal women (aged 40–44 years) with normal menstrual cycles, but their frequency increased with age and menopausal phase (43). The symptoms lasted for years and continued until five or more years post menopause with the same frequency and intensity as during the menopausal transition (44, 45).

In this study, post-menopausal women had the highest prevalence of cardiac symptoms at 52.6%, reflecting their risk of having cardiovascular disease. A meta-analysis on the development of cardiovascular disease among menopausal women reported that vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms were associated with an increased risk of chronic heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular disease (46). Meanwhile, the prevalence of sleep disturbances and joint and muscle discomfort among premenopausal women was 24.9 and 53.8%, respectively, which was similar to the results of a systematic review of middle-aged Asian women, where the prevalence of sleep disturbances was 6.1–54% and joint and muscle discomfort 10.3–82.1% (47).

In the sleep disturbances subgroup, all the findings were significant, with post-menopausal women at higher risk of sleep disturbances than premenopausal (OR: 2.24) and perimenopausal (OR: 0.70) women. Similar findings were published in a meta-analysis in 2014, where the odds for post-menopausal women were 1.67 times higher than for premenopausal women and 1.09 times higher than for perimenopausal women (48). This significant association is also supported by other reviews (49, 50). Increased sleep disturbances during the menopausal transition are likely due to hot flashes occurring during the night because women with hot flashes may also experience nocturnal awakening unrelated to VMS (49). Around 60–80% of women experience hot flashes during the menopausal transition (51). They persist for 4–5 years (52) and commonly lead to sleep disturbances among perimenopausal and post-menopausal women.

Menopause can be psychologically distressing for women. Subscale of psychological symptoms showed that the occurrence of clinical depression in this study did not increase significantly among premenopausal and post-menopausal women, with perimenopausal women as the reference group. However, depression was 1.39 times more likely for post-menopausal than premenopausal women. A meta-analysis found similar results: post-menopausal women were 1.5 times more likely to experience depression than premenopausal women (53). The study also reported that post-menopausal women were 4.3 times more predisposed to major depression than premenopausal women (53). Depressive symptoms are more common during the menopausal transition for a variety of reasons, with earlier depression being one of them (54).

In our study, perimenopausal women had the highest prevalence of anxiety, which is consistent with the theory that anxiety levels rise throughout menopause and diminish following menopause (55, 56). We found that irritability was highest among post-menopausal women, which is not consistent with other studies (5760). Women in the early stages of menopause show significantly higher levels of irritability than premenopausal and post-menopausal women. Moreover, we found a higher risk of exhaustion among post-menopausal women than the other groups: perimenopausal women had a 1.78 times higher risk of developing psychological symptoms than premenopausal women and a 1.83 higher risk than premenopausal women.

Concerning genitourinary syndrome, the prevalence of sexual problems and vaginal dryness in post-menopausal women was 56.1 and 39.9%, respectively. This is similar to a large cohort study (61) among a Western population, where the estimated prevalence of vulvovaginal symptoms was found to be 45–63%. A study in Korea (62) found that 49% of post-menopausal women experienced the same symptoms. A study in Turkey revealed that low sexual function was higher among post-menopausal than premenopausal women (63). Reports have shown that 40% of women who experience vulvovaginal symptoms have sexual dysfunction, 24% lack sexual desire, 34% have arousal difficulties, and 19% experience difficulties with orgasm (64).

Strengths and Limitations

This review demonstrated the prevalence for each menopausal phase and the associated symptoms across different countries. By expressing the symptoms quantitatively, they could be compared, thus providing a comprehensive overview of the various studies' results. In general, a meta-analysis of prevalence study can provide useful information about disease burden, such as finding discrepancies between populations and regions (65). However, this study was not without limitations. Diverse instruments were used to determine the symptoms during the menopausal transition, which reduced the comparability of the results. This review only included English-language publications; however, there is no evidence of a systematic bias in the use of language restrictions in systematic review-based meta-analyses in conventional medicine (66). We attempted to produce convincing evidence by including high quality studies. Two moderate and low quality studies were excluded from the review. However, the exclusion itself may possibly introduce potential biases in the review process.

Conclusions

This review demonstrated that post-menopausal women are at a higher risk of menopausal symptoms than premenopausal and perimenopausal women. Additionally, post-menopausal women have a significantly higher risk of experiencing genitourinary syndrome than other groups of symptoms compared to premenopausal and perimenopausal women. Healthcare practitioners must regularly evaluate the symptoms of postmenopausal women in order to offer them a higher quality of life. Future research should focus on various phases of menopausal symptoms in order to acquire a comprehensive picture of menopause.

Search Strategy

1. psychology

2. mental

3. anxiety

4. depression

5. stress

6. #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5

7. menopause

8. #6 AND #7

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

NHNH, MNN, and ISB: conceptualization and methodology. NHNH and MNN: validation, resources, and visualization. NHNH, MNN, ISB, and NANMA: formal analysis, investigation, and writing—review and editing. NHNH, MNN, and NANMA: data curation. NANMA: writing—original draft preparation. NHNH: supervision. MNN: project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Amran Mamat and Ms. Nurul Azurah Mohd Roni, librarians from Hamdan Tahir Library, for their assistance with database searches.

References

1. Dratva J, Real FG, Schindler C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Gerbase MW, Probst-Hensch NM, et al. Is age at menopause increasing across Europe? Results on age at menopause and determinants from two population-based studies. Menopause. (2009) 16:2:385–94. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31818aefef

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Soules MR, Sherman S, Parrott E, Rebar R, Santoro N, Utian W, et al. Executive summary: stages of reproductive aging workshop (STRAW). Climacteric. (2001) 4:4:267–72. doi: 10.1080/cmt.4.4.267.272

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hunter M, Rendall M. Bio-psycho-socio-cultural perspectives on menopause. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. (2007) 21:2:261–74. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. WHO. Scientific Group on Research on the Menopause in the 1990s. World Health Organization Technical Report Series 866. Geneva: World Health Organization (1994).

Google Scholar

5. Brambilla DJ, Mckinlay SM, Johannes CB. Defining the perimenopause for application in epidemiologic investigations. Am J Epidemiol. (1994) 140:12:1091–5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Portman DJ, Gass ML. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: new terminology for vulvovaginal atrophy from the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health and the North American Menopause Society. Maturitas. (2014) 79:3:349–54. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Areti A, Michalis M, Aikaterini L, George K, Rallou L, Konstantinos P. Psychosomatic and vasomotor symptom changes during transition to menopause [article]. Menopause Rev. (2019) 18:2:110–5. doi: 10.5114/pm.2019.86835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Alder J, Urech C. Psychotherapie in der Frauenheilkunde. Vol. 56. Gottingen: Hogrefe Verlag (2014).

Google Scholar

9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. (2009) 151:4:264–9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Aromataris E, Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute (2020). Chapter 5 p. Available online at: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global (accessed 03 March 2021).

11. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.1 (Updated September 2020). 2n ed. Cochrane (2020). Available online at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed 30 March 2021).

Google Scholar

12. Abdelrahman R, Abushaikha L, al-Motlaq M. Predictors of psychological well-being and stress among Jordanian menopausal women. Qual Life Res. (2014) 23:167. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0464-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chedraui P, Aguirre W, Hidalgo L, Fayad L. Assessing menopausal symptoms among healthy middle aged women with the Menopause Rating Scale. Maturitas. (2007) 57: 271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chim H, Tan BHI, Ang CC, Chew EMD, Chong YS, Saw SM. The prevalence of menopausal symptoms in a community in Singapore. Maturitas. (2002) 41:275–82. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5122(01)00299-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cuadros JL, Fernández-Alonso AM, Cuadros-Celorrio AM, Fernández-Luzón N, Guadix-Peinado MJ, del Cid-Martín N, et al. Perceived stress, insomnia and related factors in women around the menopause. Maturitas. (2012) 72:367–72. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.05.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ornat L, Martínez-Dearth R, Muñoz A, Franco P, Alonso B, Tajada M, et al. Sexual function, satisfaction with life and menopausal symptoms in middle-aged women. Maturitas. (2013) 75:261–9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Moilanen J, Aalto AM, Hemminki E, Aro AR, Raitanen J, Luoto R. Prevalence of menopause symptoms and their association with lifestyle among Finnish middle-aged women. Maturitas. (2010) 67:368–74. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.08.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Arakane M, Castillo C, Rosero MF, Peñafiel R, Pérez-López FR, Chedraui P. Factors relating to insomnia during the menopausal transition as evaluated by the Insomnia Severity Index. Maturitas. (2011) 69:157–61. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Coronado PJ, Sánchez-Borrego R, Ruiz MA, Baquedano L, Sánchez S, Argudo C, et al. Psychometric attributes of the cervantes short-form questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in menopausal women. Maturitas. (2016) 84:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.10.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chedraui P, Pérez-López FR, Morales B, Hidalgo L. Depressive symptoms in climacteric women are related to menopausal symptom intensity and partner factors. Climacteric. (2009) 12:395–403. doi: 10.1080/13697130902718150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Biri A, Bakar C, Maral I, Karabacak O, Bumin MA. Women with and without menopause over age of 40 in Turkey: consequences and treatment options. Maturitas. (2005) 50:167–76. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gozuyesil E, Gokyildiz Surucu S, Alan S. Sexual function and quality-of-life-related problems during the menopausal period. J Health Psychol. (2018) 23:1769–80. doi: 10.1177/1359105317742194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Ryu KJ, Park H, Kim YJ, Yi KW, Shin JH, Hur JY, et al. Comparison of various menopausal symptoms and risk factor analysis in Korean women according to stage of menopause. Maturitas. (2020) 140:41–8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Shin C, Lee S, Lee T, Shin K, Yi H, Kimm K, et al. Prevalence of insomnia and its relationship to menopausal status in middle-aged Korean women. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2005) 59:395–02. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01391.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Luo M, Li J, Tang R, Li HJ, Liu B, Peng Y, et al. Insomnia symptoms in relation to menopause among middle-aged Chinese women: findings from a longitudinal cohort study. Maturitas. (2020) 141:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Sun D, Shao H, Li C, Tao M. Sleep disturbance and correlates in menopausal women in Shanghai. J Psychosom Res. (2014) 76:237–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ahsan M, Mallick AK, Singh R, Prasad RR. Assessment of menopausal symptoms during perimenopause and postmenopause in tertiary Care hospital [article in journal/newspaper]. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci. (2015) 4:14–9. doi: 10.4103/2278-960X.153516

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Alam MM, Ahmed S, Dipti RK, Siddiquee R-EJ, Hawlader MDH. The prevalence and associated factors of depression during pre-, peri-, and post-menopausal period among the middle-aged women of Dhaka city. Asian J Psychiatr. (2020) 54:102312. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. AlJoharah MA, Salwa AT, Fawzia Ahmed H. Assessment of symptoms of menopause and their severity among Saudi women in Riyadh. Ann Saudi Med. (2013) 1:63–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Avis NE, Crawford SL, Greendale G, Bromberger JT, Everson-Rose SA, Gold EB, et al. Duration of menopausal vasomotor symptoms over the menopause transition. JAMA Intern Med. (2015) 175:531–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. El Shafie K, Al Farsi Y, Al Zadjali N, Al Adawi S, Al Busaidi Z, Al Shafaee M. Menopausal symptoms among healthy, middle-aged Omani women as assessed with the Menopause Rating Scale. Menopause. (2011) 18:1113–9. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31821b82ee

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Engida Y, Natnael E, Stephanie L, Berhanu D. Prevalence and severity of menopause symptoms among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women aged 30-49 years in Gulele sub-city of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [article]. BMC Womens Health. (2017) 17:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0484-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Becker D, Lomranz J, Pines A, Shmotkin D, Nitza E, Bennamitay G, et al. Psychological distress around menopause. Psychosomatics. (2001) 42:252–7. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.3.252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Kuninori S, Yosuke Y, Iwao S, Masato H, Masami N, Shosui M, et al. Vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms influenced by menopausal stage and psychosocial factors in Japanese middle-aged women [text]. J Occup Health. (2001) 43:356–64.

Google Scholar

35. Chernichenko I, Ryzhak G. Perimenopausal disorders: age-related, psychological, and social predictors of their emergence. Adv Gerontol. (2012) 2:144. doi: 10.1134/S207905701202004X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Binfa L, Castelo-Branco C, Blümel JE, Cancelo MaJ, Bonilla H, Muñoz I, et al. Influence of psycho-social factors on climacteric symptoms. Maturitas. (2004) 48:425–31. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. da Silva AR, d‘Andretta Tanaka AC. Factors associated with menopausal symptom severity in middle-aged Brazilian women from the Brazilian Western Amazon. Maturitas. (2013) 76:64–9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.05.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Raczkiewicz D, Owoc A, Wierzbińska-Stepniak A, Bojar I. Metabolic syndrome in peri - and postmenopausal women performing intellectual work. Ann Agric Environ Med. (2018) 25:610–5. doi: 10.26444/aaem/74451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Fabbrini M, Aricò I, Tramonti F, Condurso R, Carnicelli L, De Rosa A, et al. Sleep disorders in menopause: results from an Italian Multicentric Study. Archives italiennes de biologie. (2015) 153:204–13.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Koirala S, Manandhar N. Quality of life of peri and postmenopausal women attending outpatient department of obstretics and gynecology of a tertiary care hospital. J Nepal Health Res Counc. (2018) 16:32–5. doi: 10.3126/jnhrc.v16i1.19360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kronenberg F. Hot flashes: epidemiology and physiologya. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1990) 592:52–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb30316.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Feldman BM, Voda A, Gronseth E. The prevalence of hot flash and associated variables among perimenopausal women. Res Nurs Health. (1985) 8:261–8. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770080308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Blümel J, Chedraui P, Baron G, Belzares E, Bencosme A, Calle A, et al. Menopausal symptoms appear before the menopause and persist 5 years beyond: a detailed analysis of a multinational study. Climacteric. (2012) 15:542–51. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2012.658462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Avis NE, Stellato R, Crawford S, Johannes C, Longcope C. Is there an association between menopause status and sexual functioning? Menopause. (2000) 7:297–309. doi: 10.1097/00042192-200007050-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Mckinlay SM, Brambilla DJ, Posner JG. “Reprint of” the normal menopause transition. Maturitas. (2008) 61:1–2, 4–16. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Muka T, Oliver-Williams C, Colpani V, Kunutsor S, Chowdhury S, Chowdhury R, et al. Association of vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms with risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. (2016) 11:e0157417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Islam MR, Gartoulla P, Bell RJ, Fradkin P, Davis SR. Prevalence of menopausal symptoms in Asian midlife women: a systematic review. Climacteric. (2015) 18:157–76. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.937689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Xu Q, Lang CP. Examining the relationship between subjective sleep disturbance and menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Menopause. (2014) 21:1301–18. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Joffe H, Massler A, Sharkey KM. Evaluation and management of sleep disturbance during the menopause transition. Semin Reprod Med. (2010) 28:404. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262900

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Guidozzi F. Sleep and sleep disorders in menopausal women. Climacteric. (2013) 16:214–9. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2012.753873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Gold EB, Sternfeld B, Kelsey JL, Brown C, Mouton C, Reame N, et al. Relation of demographic and lifestyle factors to symptoms in a multi-racial/ethnic population of women 40–55 years of age. Am J Epidemiol. (2000) 152:463–73. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.5.463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Politi MC, Schleinitz MD, Col NF. Revisiting the duration of vasomotor symptoms of menopause: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. (2008) 23:1507–13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0655-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Weber MT, Maki PM, McDermott MP. Cognition and mood in perimenopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. (2014) 142:90–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Boorman DW, Zhang R. Longitudinal pattern of depressive symptoms around natural menopause. JAMA Psychiatry. (2014) 71:36–43. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2819

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Bromberger JT, Meyer PM, Kravitz HM, Sommer B, Cordal A, Powell L, et al. Psychologic distress and natural menopause: a multiethnic community study. Am J Public Health. (2001) 91:1435–42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Gracia CR, Kapoor S, Ferdousi T. The role of anxiety and hormonal changes in menopausal hot flashes. Menopause. (2005) 12:258–66. doi: 10.1097/01.GME.0000142440.49698.B7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Mauas V, Kopala-Sibley DC, Zuroff DC. Depressive symptoms in the transition to menopause: the roles of irritability, personality vulnerability, and self-regulation. Arch Womens Ment Health. (2014) 17:279–89. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0434-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Avis NE, Brambilla D, McKinlay SM, Vass K. A longitudinal analysis of the association between menopause and depression results from the Massachusetts women's health study. Ann Epidemiol. (1994) 4:214–20. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90099-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Nelson DB. Associations of hormones and menopausal status with depressed mood in women with no history of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2006) 63:375–82. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.4.375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Schmidt PJ, Murphy J, Haq N, Rubinow D, Danaceau M. Stressful life events, personal losses, and perimenopause-related depression. Arch Womens Ment Health. (2004) 7:19–26. doi: 10.1007/s00737-003-0036-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Nappi RE, Kokot-Kierepa M. Women's voices in the menopause: results from an international survey on vaginal atrophy. Maturitas. (2010) 67:233–8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Chae HD, Choi SY, Cho EJ, Cho YM, Lee SR, Lee ES, et al. Awareness and experience of menopausal symptom and hormone therapy in korean postmenopausal women. J Menopausal Med. (2014) 20:7. doi: 10.6118/jmm.2014.20.1.7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Verit FF, Verit A, Billurcu N. Low sexual function and its associated risk factors in pre-and postmenopausal women without clinically significant depression. Maturitas. (2009) 64:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Levine KB, Williams RE, Hartmann KE. Vulvovaginal atrophy is strongly associated with female sexual dysfunction among sexually active postmenopausal women. Menopause. (2008) 15:661–6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31815a5168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Borges Migliavaca C, Stein C, Colpani V, Barker TH, Munn Z, Falavigna M, et al. How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2020) 20:96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00975-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

66. Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, Moulton K, Clark M, Fiander M, et al. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2012) 28:138–44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: menopause, prevalence, psychosomatic, genitourinary syndrome, symptom

Citation: Nik Hazlina NH, Norhayati MN, Shaiful Bahari I and Nik Muhammad Arif NA (2022) Prevalence of Psychosomatic and Genitourinary Syndrome Among Menopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 9:848202. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.848202

Received: 04 January 2022; Accepted: 08 February 2022;
Published: 03 March 2022.

Edited by:

Isabella Fabietti, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Italy

Reviewed by:

Elisa Bevilacqua, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Italy
Ana Katherine Gonçalves, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Copyright © 2022 Nik Hazlina, Norhayati, Shaiful Bahari and Nik Muhammad Arif. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mohd Noor Norhayati, aGF5YXRpa2tAdXNtLm15

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.