Xiaoqiang Li1*Hui Du2Zhibin Song1Hui Wang1Xiong Long3- 1Department of Neurology, Affiliated Xiaolan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Zhongshan, China
- 2Department of Clinical Laboratory Center, Affiliated Xiaolan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Zhongshan, China
- 3Emergency Department, Affiliated Xiaolan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Zhongshan, China
Background: Anaerobic meningitis is a severe central nervous system infection associated with significant neurological sequelae and high mortality. However, the precise detection of causative pathogen(s) remains difficult because anaerobic bacteria are difficult to culture. Next-generation sequencing is a technology that was developed recently and has been applied in many fields. To the best of our knowledge, the use of next-generation sequencing for cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the diagnosis of anaerobic meningitis has been rarely reported.
Case presentation: Here, we report a case of polymicrobial anaerobic meningitis diagnosed using next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid in a 16-year-old girl. Five species of anaerobic bacteria (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella enoeca, Campylobacter rectus, Fusobacterium uncleatum, and Actinomyces israelii) were detected by next-generation sequencing and treated with antibacterial agents (ceftriaxone, vancomycin, and metronidazole). The patient responded well to antibacterial treatment. Further inspection revealed bone destruction at the base of the skull, which further confirmed that these bacteria had originated from the oral cavity. One month later, the patient's condition improved significantly. At the same time, we performed a literature review on anaerobic meningitis using studies published in the last 20 years.
Conclusions: This case emphasizes the importance of applying metagenomic next-generation sequencing to clinch the clinical diagnosis for patients with central nervous system infection. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing has been reported to be an important diagnostic modality for identifying uncommon pathogens.
Background
Anaerobic meningitis is an uncommon disease. However, its true incidence may be underestimated because anaerobic bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid are difficult to isolate and culture; therefore, the prognosis of anaerobic meningitis is usually poor (1, 2). Despite treatment, the mortality rate of patients with anaerobic meningitis may be as high as 30.8% (3). Reliable laboratory tests performed early in the disease course are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of anaerobic meningitis.
Anaerobic bacterial culture of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is not performed routinely because cases of meningitis caused by anaerobic pathogens are rarely encountered (4). In addition, anaerobic bacterial culture is difficult to perform. Instead, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is often used to detect the anaerobic pathogens causing bacterial meningitis. However, PCR can only detect designated pathogens via specific probes and targeted primers, due to which many pathogens may be missed (5, 6).
Unlike traditional testing for specific pathogens, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), an emerging and promising modality, can identify a wide variety of potential causes (bacterial, viral, tuberculosis, fungal, and parasitic) (7). Improving our ability to identify novel or unexpected pathogens (8, 9). It also has the advantages of low cost and rapid turnaround time (10).
Although anaerobic meningitis is being increasingly recognized and reported in recent years, rapid identification of the causative anaerobic pathogen using mNGS resulting is improved patient outcomes is rarely reported. Here, we present a case of a patient with anaerobic meningitis. Multiple CSF cultures performed initially remained negative; however, the patient was finally diagnosed with polymicrobial anaerobic meningitis secondary to sinusitis when five species of anaerobic bacteria were isolated using mNGS. In addition, we reviewed the main features of the reported cases of anaerobic meningitis published in recent years.
Case Presentation
A 16-year-old girl presented to the emergency department due to complaints of fever, severe headache. Her physical examination revealed a fever of 38.1°C; and neurological examination revealed a stiff neck and positive Brudzinski and Kernig signs. The Glasgow Coma Scale score was 10.
Head computed tomography (CT) showed brain swelling. A lumbar puncture was performed, which revealed a high opening pressure (310 mmH2O). CSF analysis showed that the fluid was cloudy, having a high protein (544.1 mg/dL, reference range 15–45 mg/dL) and low glucose (0.88 mmol/L, reference range 3.3–4.5 mmol/L) content and an elevated white blood cell count with neutrophilic predominance (13,206 cells/mm3, polymorphs 80%). Meanwhile, her CSF sample was sent to laboratory for pathogen detection at low temperature. Briefly, the patient's parents had signed informed consent, the CSF sample was collected and stored at −20°C, and then sent to laboratory of BGI-Shenzhen within 12 h. DNA was extracted with a TIANamp Micro DNA Kit (DP316, TIANGEN BIOTECH, Beijing, China) following the manufacturers' instructions. DNA libraries were constructed via end-repaired adaptation added overnight, and application of polymerase chain reaction amplification to extracted DNA. A Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) in combination with quantitative PCR was used to quantify DNA libraries. DNA sequencing was then performed on the BGISEQ-50 platform (BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China) (11). High-quality sequencing data were generated after filtering out low-quality, low-complexity, and shorter reads. Then, the remaining sequencing data were aligned to the Date of BGI, which contains 6,350 bacteria, 1,798 DNA viruses, 1,064 species of fungi and 234 parasites, to identify the pathogenic sequences. An advanced data analysis was then performed, as for the mapped data.
Our hospital laboratory test results showed leukocytosis with neutrophilia (total leukocyte count: 25.4 × 109/L; neutrophils: 88.7%) and elevated levels of interleukin-6 (200.8 pg/mL) and procalcitonin (49.9 ng/ml). CSF and blood cultures were performed multiple times. However, brain magnetic resonance imaging performed the following day was reported to be normal. Intravenous ceftriaxone 80 mg/kg once daily and vancomycin 50 mg/kg twice a day were administered. Mannitol 20% and steroids was also administered to lower the intracranial pressure.
Over the next 3 days, fever and headache resolved. However, the Kernig sign remained positive. Blood bacterial culture and gram staining of the CSF on admission was normal. We decided to perform further investigations (chest and abdominal CT and abdominal ultrasonography) to identify the source of infection. Unfortunately, these investigations did not yield positive results. Meanwhile, thorough oral cavity, dental, ear, nose, and throat examinations were performed to identify a potential source of infection; and no tooth decay or pathological changes were identified. mNGS results showed anaerobic bacteria, namely, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella enoeca, Campylobacter rectus, Fusobacterium uncleatum, and Actinomyces israelii (Figure 1), which are all oral bacteria. We thought it may be a mistake of the laboratory or contamination during CSF collection. And, repeat CSF cultures were negative.
Figure 1. Anaerobic bacteria found by mNGS. (A) Anaerobic bacteria found by mNGS first times. Porphyromonas gingivalis: 260 reads; Prevotella enoeca: 55 reads; Campylobacter rectus: 18 reads; Fusobacterium uncleatum: 10 reads; Actinomyces israelii: 4 reads; (B) Anaerobic bacteria found by mNGS second times. Porphyromonas gingivalis: 47 reads; Fusobacterium uncleatum: 40 reads; Treponema socranskii: 34 reads.
Lumbar puncture was performed again to detect the pathogens by mNGS 20 days later, which showed that the anaerobic bacteria were the same as before (Figure 1). At this time, we reviewed the patient's head CT findings (Figure 2) again and found that the patient's clivus, bony part of the skull base, was eroded. Repeat head CT (Figure 2) was immediately performed, and the bone quality was significantly better than that before admission. This patient had no history of cancer or trauma, and we speculated that sphenoid sinusitis had led to the destruction of clivus with subsequent infection of the meninges by oral anaerobic bacteria. Due to persistent elevation of white blood cell count on CSF analysis, we added metronidazole, which targets anaerobes, to the regimen. At 3-month follow-up, the patient appeared well and had returned to normal activity. Repeat head CT showed resolution of bone destruction (Supplementary Information).
Figure 2. Paranasal sinus caused significant bony erosion. (A) Cranial CT at admission. (B) Cranial CT 1 month later. Red arrows indicate bone destruction. #refer to the clivus, *for sphenoid sinus.
Discussion
Anaerobic meningitis is an uncommon disease occurring due to contiguous spread of infection from the head or neck (12, 13). In general, infections caused by anaerobic bacteria are usually devastating (14). Here, we report a case of polymicrobial anaerobic meningitis caused by oral anaerobic bacteria entering the intracranial cavity due to bone destruction of the base of the skull secondary to sinusitis. Moreover, mNGS identified the pathogen in time, and the patient received optimal antibiotics, which led to a good prognosis.
Currently, the diagnosis of bacterial infections relies on the isolation and culture of bacteria. Bacterial culture of CSF remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. However, the diagnostic yield of CSF culture is low, and the process is time-consuming (requiring more than 72 h) (15–17). This may be the reason why the incidence of anaerobic meningitis is underestimated in clinical practice, since many of the pathogens causing intracranial infections are not identified (18, 19). In terms of treatment, when the causative pathogen cannot be identified, broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics are administered, which induces antibiotic resistance and increases the burden on the patients (20). Considering the difficulty in culturing anaerobes, PCR of CSF is employed to detect microbial DNA in patients with bacterial meningitis. The 16S rRNA gene is a DNA sequence encoding 16S rRNA. It is found in the bacterial chromosome, but does not exist in Non-prokaryotic organisms such as viruses and fungi. The 16S rRNA gene has a high degree of specificity and conservation. In the literature, most cases of anaerobic intracranial infections were definitively diagnosed using 16S rRNA PCR (14, 21, 22). However, this technique does not identify all bacteria and pathogens that are detected by CSF culture (21, 22). Moreover, the current PCR techniques used to detect bacterial meningitis are too expensive for patients in rural regions (23, 24). Thus, it is difficult to implement existing PCR tests in areas with the highest incidence of bacterial meningitis.
Therefore, rapid diagnosis of intracranial infections and preliminary classification of bacteria are clinical problems that need to be resolved urgently. mNGS is a novel and promising approach in diagnostic microbiology having the ability to detect many potential microorganisms using a single assay (7, 25). Previous studies show that mNGS of CSF obtained from patients with central nervous system infections improved the diagnostic rate and provided actionable information (26, 27). In this case, the mNGS detected the pathogens in time and provided a direction for us to identify the source of infection. Below, we review the relevant literature on anaerobic meningitis.
Recent studies on anaerobic meningitis that were published in the last 20 years were identified using an electronic search (Table 1). Our analysis showed that very few cases of anaerobic meningitis have been reported. However, the incidence of bacterial meningitis is very high worldwide (28, 29). The main reason for this may be that anaerobic meningitis is difficult to diagnose. The age at onset reported in these studies was variable, reflecting that anaerobic meningitis can affect a wide range of age groups. Moreover, the prognosis of the patients was very poor (21, 22), and only a few of the cases reported complete recovery of the patient (4, 30). However, the prognosis was poor compare to bacterial meningitis (31). Inappropriate antibiotic therapy administered due to the delay in diagnosis is the cause of increase in the sequelae and mortality of anaerobic meningitis (32).
Table 1. Main features of reported cases of anaerobic meningitis.
Exact incidence of anaerobic meningitis is unclear and was presented in only a few case reports. We found that PCR can be an important method for the diagnosis of anaerobic meningitis but it does not detect all organisms and is expensive. Moreover, culturing anaerobic organisms may be difficult; therefore, it is challenging to promptly diagnose anaerobic meningitis. This case shows that mNGS may be more effective than traditional microbial detection methods. In addition, early diagnosis and timely administration of appropriate antibiotic treatment can be life-saving. Efforts should be made to ensure the widespread availability and use of mNGS.
Conclusions
We were able to correctly diagnose our patient with anaerobic meningitis, owing to the application of mNGS, due to which she was administered appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This case demonstrates that the process of diagnosing anaerobic meningitis is imprecise due to which its incidence may be higher than reported. Possibility of anaerobic meningitis should be kept in mind if the clinical course of the patient does not progress as expected and the mNGS technology may be a good tool to help establish the correct diagnosis.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author Contributions
XLi reviewed the literature, analyzed the patient data, and wrote the manuscript. HD and XLi were responsible for data collection. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to the patient for participating in this study.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.840910/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CT, computed tomography; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing; rRNA, ribosomal ribonucleic acid.
References
1. Guardado R, Asensi V, Torres JM, Pérez F, Blanco A, Maradona JA, et al. Post-surgical enterococcal meningitis: clinical and epidemiological study of 20 cases. Scand J Infect Dis. (2006) 38:584–8. doi: 10.1080/00365540600606416
2. Brook I. Meningitis and shunt infection caused by anaerobic bacteria in children. Pediatr Neurol. (2002) 26:99–105. doi: 10.1016/S0887-8994(01)00330-7
3. Lee JJ, Lien CY, Chien CC, Huang CR, Tsai NW, Chang CC, et al. Anaerobic bacterial meningitis in adults. J Clin Neurosci. (2018) 50:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.014
4. Kalay GN, Dalgic N, Bozan T, Ulger-Toprak N, Bayraktar B, Soyletir G. Polymicrobial anaerobic meningitis caused by bacteroides fragilis, bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, fusobacterium necrophorum and slackia exigua in a patient with mastoiditis following otitis media. Anaerobe. (2019) 56:95–7. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.02.003
5. Li ZY, Dang D, Wu H. Next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of unexplained central nervous system infections. Pediatr Neurol. (2021) 115:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.10.011
6. He Y, Ruan G, Hao H, Xue F, Zhu S, Xiao B, et al. Evaluation of quadruple real-time pcr method to detect enterococci carrying vancomycin-resistant genes vana, vanb, vanm in rectal swabs. Front Med. (2020) 7:403. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00403
7. Forbes JD, Knox NC, Ronholm J, Pagotto F, Reimer A. Metagenomics: the next culture-independent game changer. Front Microbiol. (2017) 8:1069. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01069
8. Wilson MR, Suan D, Duggins A, Schubert RD, Khan LM, Sample HA, et al. A novel cause of chronic viral meningoencephalitis: cache valley virus. Ann Neurol. (2017) 82:105–14. doi: 10.1002/ana.24982
9. Wilson MR, Zimmermann LL, Crawford ED, Sample HA, Soni PR, Baker AN, et al. Acute west nile virus meningoencephalitis diagnosed via metagenomic deep sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid in a renal transplant patient. Am J Transplant. (2017) 17:803–8. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14058
10. Yan L, Sun W, Lu Z, Fan L. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (Mngs) in cerebrospinal fluid for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis in HIV-negative population. Int J Infect Dis. (2020) 96:270–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.048
11. Jeon YJ, Zhou Y, Li Y, Guo Q, Chen J, Quan S, et al. The feasibility study of non-invasive fetal trisomy 18 and 21 detection with semiconductor sequencing platform. PloS One. (2014) 9:e110240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110240
12. Heerema MS, Ein ME, Musher DM, Bradshaw MW, Williams TW Jr. Anaerobic bacterial meningitis. Am J Med. (1979) 67:219–27. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(79)90394-2
13. Korman TM, Athan E, Spelman DW. Anaerobic meningitis due to peptostreptococcus species: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. (1997) 25:1462–4. doi: 10.1086/516147
14. Shachor-Meyouhas Y, Guilburd JN, Bar-Joseph G, Kassis I. Anaerobic meningitis after missed penetrating trauma in a 6-year old child. Anaerobe. (2010) 16:623–5. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.08.003
15. Favaro M, Savini V, Favalli C, Fontana C. A multi-target real-time pcr assay for rapid identification of meningitis-associated microorganisms. Mol Biotechnol. (2013) 53:74–9. doi: 10.1007/s12033-012-9534-7
16. Etyang AO, Amayo EO, Bhatt SM, Wamola IA, Maritim MC. Comparison of bedside inoculation of culture media with conventional cerebrospinal fluid culture method in patients with bacterial meningitis. East Afr Med J. (2009) 86:476–9. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v86i10.54970
17. Xie Y, Ruan B, Lang G, Zhu B. Case report: streptococcus suis meningitis diagnosed in a HIV-infected patient with cryptococcal meningitis using next-generation sequencing. Front Med. (2021) 8:736064. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.736064
18. Vora NM, Holman RC, Mehal JM, Steiner CA, Blanton J, Sejvar J. Burden of encephalitis-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1998–2010. Neurology. (2014) 82:443–51. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000086
19. Glaser CA, Honarmand S, Anderson LJ, Schnurr DP, Forghani B, Cossen CK, et al. Beyond viruses: clinical profiles and etiologies associated with encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis. (2006) 43:1565–77. doi: 10.1086/509330
20. Mwangi I, Berkley J, Lowe B, Peshu N, Marsh K, Newton CR. Acute bacterial meningitis in children admitted to a rural kenyan hospital: increasing antibiotic resistance and outcome. Pediatr Infect Dis J. (2002) 21:1042–8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200211000-00013
21. Llitjos JF, Mongardon N, Loubinoux J, Sonneville R, Charpentier J, Pène F, et al. Polymicrobial anaerobic meningitis. Med Mal Infect. (2016) 46:230–2. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2016.01.008
22. Ganeshalingham A, Buckley D, Shaw I, Freeman JT, Wilson F, Best E. Bacteroides fragilis concealed in an infant with escherichia coli meningitis. J Paediatr Child Health. (2014) 50:78–80. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12394
23. Huy NT, Hang le TT, Boamah D, Lan NT, van Thanh P, Watanabe K, et al. Development of a single-tube loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of four pathogens of bacterial meningitis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. (2012) 337:25–30. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12002
24. Chiba N, Murayama SY, Morozumi M, Nakayama E, Okada T, Iwata S, et al. Rapid detection of eight causative pathogens for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis by real-time Pcr. J Infect Chemother. (2009) 15:92–8. doi: 10.1007/s10156-009-0670-3
25. Goldberg B, Sichtig H, Geyer C, Ledeboer N, Weinstock GM. Making the leap from research laboratory to clinic: challenges and opportunities for next-generation sequencing in infectious disease diagnostics. mBio. (2015) 6:e01888–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01888-15
26. Zhang X, Wu Z, Wang K. Diagnosis of streptococcus suis meningoencephalitis with metagenomic next-generation sequencing of the cerebrospinal fluid: a case report with literature review. BMC Infect Dis. (2020) 20:884. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05621-3
27. Mao Y, Li X, Lou H, Shang X, Mai Y, Yang L, et al. Detection of coccidioides posadasii in a patient with meningitis using metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. (2021) 21:968. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06661-z
28. van de Beek D, Brouwer M, Hasbun R, Koedel U, Whitney CG, Wijdicks E. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2016) 2:16074. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.74
29. McGill F, Heyderman RS, Panagiotou S, Tunkel AR, Solomon T. Acute bacterial meningitis in adults. Lance. (2016) 388:3036–47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30654-7
30. Phillips JT, Brown SR, Mitchell P, Shorthouse AJ. Anaerobic meningitis secondary to a rectothecal fistula arising from an anterior sacral meningocele: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. (2006) 49:1633–5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0646-7
31. de Jonge RC, van Furth AM, Wassenaar M, Gemke RJ, Terwee CB. Predicting sequelae and death after bacterial meningitis in childhood: a systematic review of prognostic studies. BMC Infect Dis. (2010) 10:1–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-232
Keywords: metagenomic next-generation sequencing, anaerobic meningitis, polymicrobial infection, case report, nervous system infection
Citation: Li X, Du H, Song Z, Wang H and Long X (2022) Polymicrobial Anaerobic Meningitis Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Front. Med. 9:840910. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.840910
Received: 21 December 2021; Accepted: 31 January 2022;
Published: 22 February 2022.
Edited by:
Olivia Valenzuela, University of Sonora, MexicoReviewed by:
Naveen Kumar Devanga Ragupathi, The University of Sheffield, United KingdomGraciela Castro Escarpulli, Instituto Politécnico Nacional de México (IPN), Mexico
Copyright © 2022 Li, Du, Song, Wang and Long. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoqiang Li, liboleq@163.com