Reece Jefferies1*
Harish Puttagunta1Anoushka Krishnan1
Ashley Irish1Ramyasuda Swaminathan1†
John K. Olynyk2,3†- 1Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- 2Department of Gastroenterology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- 3School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
Aim: To elucidate the role of mTOR inhibitors on iron, hepcidin and erythropoietin-mediated regulation of hemopoiesis in stable renal transplant recipients (RTR).
Background: Impaired hemopoiesis is common following renal transplantation managed using mTOR inhibitors. The mechanisms responsible are uncertain but include direct effects on iron, hepcidin or erythropoietin-mediated hemopoiesis.
Methods: We conducted a single center prospective case-control study of 26 adult RTR with stable allograft function. RTR received stable mTOR dosing (cases, 11/26 [42%]) or stable tacrolimus dosing (controls, 15/26 [58%]). Baseline demographics, full blood count, renal function, iron studies, hepcidin-25, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and erythropoietin (EPO) levels were determined.
Results: There were no differences in age, gender or allograft function. Mean daily sirolimus dose for cases was 1.72 mg, with mean trough level of 8.46 ng/mL. Mean daily tacrolimus dose for controls was 4.3 mg, with mean trough level of 5.8 ng/mL. There were no differences in mean hemoglobin (143 vs. 147 g/L; p = 0.59), MCV (88 vs. 90 fL; p = 0.35), serum ferritin (150 vs. 85.7 μg/L; p = 0.06), transferrin saturation (26 vs. 23.3%; p = 0.46), IL-6 (11 vs. 7.02 pg/ml; p = 0.14) or hepcidin-25 (3.62 vs. 3.26 nM; p = 0.76) between the groups. EPO levels were significantly higher in the group receiving mTOR therapy (16.8 vs. 8.49 IU/L; p = 0.028). On logistic regression analysis EPO level was the only variable that had a significant impact providing an odds ratio of 0.84 (95%CI 0.66–0.98). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) for the analysis was 0.77 (95%CI 0.54–0.94) with p = 0.04.
Conclusion: Higher levels of EPO in the absence of deranged iron biochemistry or hepcidin-25 levels suggest that EPO resistance rather than impaired iron metabolism may contribute to the impaired hemopoiesis previously demonstrated in RTR on mTOR therapy.
Introduction
Anemia occurs in 13–70% of individuals (1–3) following renal transplantation. Potential contributors to anemia include impaired graft function, drugs, inflammation, infection, iron deficiency and rejection. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been shown to impair haemopoiesis and cause microcytosis (4, 5). The anti-proliferative effect of this class of drugs is evidenced by the leukopenia and thrombocytopenia associated with their use (6). The mechanism by which mTOR inhibitors exert their effects on red blood cells is uncertain. Thanaut et al. suggested that sirolimus induced anemia (SIA) is most likely due to an inflammatory state (7), plausible on the basis of the known effects of inflammation on iron bioavailability and hepcidin production. Hepcidin is a 25 amino acid peptide, produced by hepatocytes, and which acts as a negative regulator of iron release from cells by binding to ferroportin, resulting in its internalization and degradation (8). Hepcidin gene inactivation results in iron overload (9) whilst over-expression results in severe iron deficiency anemia (10). Inflammation can increase hepcidin levels, primarily mediated through increased production of interleukin 6 (IL-6), which binds to the gp130 protein receptor complex causing phosphorylation of signal transducer and activation of transcription 3 (STAT3) which then promotes hepcidin transcription (11, 12). Other studies suggest that SIA is independent of drug anti-proliferative effects and that iron homeostasis maybe directly affected by sirolimus as opposed to the development of an inflammatory state (13). A final mechanism proposes the development of erythropoietin (EPO) resistance induced by mTOR inhibitors as a potential cause of SIA (14–16).
The aim of our study was to elucidate the role of mTOR inhibitors on iron, hepcidin and erythropoietin-mediated regulation of hemopoiesis in stable renal transplant recipients (RTR).
Methods
Study Design and Patient Selection
We conducted a single-center, prospective case-control study of 26 adult RTR conducted between 2016 and 2019. RTR were on stable mTOR inhibitor (cases, 11/26 [42%]) or tacrolimus dosing (controls, 15/26 [58%]). Patients were recruited opportunistically through routine follow-up clinics following renal transplant. Inclusion criteria for cases were: age >18 years, >1 year post renal transplant on either sirolimus or everolimus, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >45 ml/min and no evidence of biopsy proven rejection in the preceding 12 months. Controls received tacrolimus instead of an mTOR inhibitor. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 or >80 years, other causes of anemia such as gastrointestinal bleeding and the presence of active non-skin malignancies. The study was approved by the South Metropolitan Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee and all patients provided written informed consent before participation. Laboratory tests for the study were conducted as part of routine clinical care, except hepcidin, EPO and IL-6 assays which were not routine.
Data Collection
Baseline demographic data were collected from electronic health records and included age, gender, type of transplant, reason for transplant, years since transplant, immunosuppressive regimen with total daily dose and reason for use of mTOR inhibitor. Co-morbidities and reasons for an active inflammatory state were also recorded. No cases or controls received iron or erythropoietin supplementation in the preceding 12 months.
The preferred maintenance immunosuppression post-renal transplant at our institution is triple therapy with prednisolone, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Non-melanoma skin cancers and early allograft nephropathy are the most common reasons for switching tacrolimus to an mTOR inhibitor. 7/11 (64%) cases were using mTOR inhibitors due to non-melanoma skin cancers, with 2 of these 7 also having a history of additional solid organ malignancies. The remaining 4/11 (36%) were using mTOR inhibitors due to early allograft nephropathy with calcineurin inhibitors. Immunosuppressive regimens were variable for cases; 7/11 (64%) patients were on three agents (prednisolone, MMF and mTOR inhibitor for most), 2/11 (18%) were on two agents (mTOR inhibitor plus prednisolone or MMF) and 2/11 (18%) were on sirolimus monotherapy. Immunosuppressive regimens for controls consisted of three agents for 12/15 (80%) whilst 3/15 (20%) were on prednisolone and tacrolimus only.
Laboratory data included hemoglobin (Hb), mean cell volume (MCV), iron studies (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin and Tsats), creatinine, eGFR, hepcidin-25, EPO and IL-6 levels. eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation at our institution (17), a reported eGFR >90 ml/min was entered as 90 ml/min for the purpose of data tabulation. All laboratory data for each individual patient were from the same venepuncture.
Serum IL-6 levels were measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (Human IL-6 Quantikine HS ELISA kit, R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, USA). The assay had a sensitivity of 0.039 pg/mL (18).
Hepcidin was isolated from serum using a solid phase extraction approach, and measured by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-qTOF-MS), using a Waters Xevo XS Mass Spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, UK). Quantitation of the hepcidin was by measurement of the accurate mass [M+5H]5+ ion, against a synthetic hepcidin-25 heavy isotope standard (Peptides International, Kentucky, USA) as previously described (19–21).
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean and median values, with standard deviation (SD) and interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate. Case and control data passed normality testing using Anderson-Darling and D'Agostino-Pearson tests. Groups were compared using unpaired t-tests and results were considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. Logistic regression analysis was performed (Prism 9.1, GraphPad Software).
Results
Patient Population
There were no differences between cases and controls in terms of age, gender or allograft function (Table 1). Characteristics of renal transplants in each group are described in Table 1. Details of mTOR inhibitor and tacrolimus use, including daily doses and mean trough levels, is summarized in Table 2. Cases were significantly longer post-transplant than controls (9 vs. 3 years; p = 0.001).
Table 1. Characteristics of RTR subjects included in study.
Table 2. Details of mTOR inhibitor and tacrolimus use.
Two cases had underlying inflammatory states; one had chronic Mycobacterium avium complex infection on therapy and a second had colitis 1 week prior to venepuncture.
Red Blood Cell Indices, Iron Studies, Hepcidin, and IL-6
The mean Hb and MCV levels for both cases and controls were within the reference range and there were no significant differences between the two groups (Table 3). There were no significant differences for serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, hepcidin-25 or IL-6 levels between the two groups (Tables 3, 4). The mean EPO levels were significantly higher in the mTOR inhibitor group compared with controls (16.8 vs. 8.49 IU/L, p = 0.028). A logistic regression analysis was performed using mTOR use (yes/no), Hb and EPO levels as the variables. EPO level was the only variable that had a significant impact on the model providing an odds ratio of 0.84 (95%CI 0.66–0.98). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) for the analysis was 0.77 (95%CI 0.54–0.94) with p = 0.04.
Table 3. Red blood cell indices and iron study parameters.
Table 4. EPO, hepcidin and IL-6 levels.
Discussion
Several mechanisms have been suggested to underly the impaired hemopoiesis observed in RTR receiving mTOR inhibitor therapy. These include inflammation, impaired iron or hepcidin metabolism, and dysregulated erythropoietin metabolism. Whilst subjects in our study receiving mTOR inhibitor or tacrolimus therapy had similar hematologic parameters, serum iron biochemistry, renal function, hepcidin and IL-6 levels, we observed that those receiving mTOR inhibitors had higher levels of EPO, suggesting that EPO resistance is induced by mTOR inhibitor treatment. In both groups eGFR was maintained suggesting elevated EPO was not explained by declining renal function. In our study, the elevated EPO production was able to compensate and preserve hemopoiesis. Previous studies have demonstrated that microcytosis or anemia are induced in mTOR inhibitor-treated subjects (7, 13–15, 22–24). EPO is also known to inhibit hepcidin production (25–28). The presence of similar hepcidin levels in the mTOR and tacrolimus groups, despite the elevated EPO levels in the former, suggests that the effects of EPO are probably direct and not mediated via changes in hepcidin production. In vitro studies have demonstrated that mTOR inhibitors induce microcytosis, possibly due to inhibition of erythroid precursors (22, 23) and that these effects are not overcome by increasing available iron in the culture environment (23). This microcytosis is reversed by withdrawal of mTOR inhibitors (7, 13, 15).
Chronic inflammation has been implicated in the causation of microcytic anemia secondary to sirolimus. Thanaut et al. observed elevations in ferritin and CRP in patients on sirolimus which fell after withdrawal of the drug (7). A subset analysis in the same study demonstrated elevated IL-6 and TNF∝ measurements that fell with sirolimus withdrawal in six patients. Sirolimus trough levels were higher than those seen in our study. Przybylowski et al. reported elevated hepcidin and IL-6 levels in orthotopic heart transplant patients treated with mTOR inhibitors and suggested that chronic inflammation and increased hepcidin production may be responsible for functional iron deficiency in these patients (29). This study had significant confounding variables, including older age, lower eGFR and higher BNP levels in mTOR inhibitor group. A prospective randomized study by Maiorano et al. produced results consistent with our observations, demonstrating that prohepcidin levels were similar in patients on sirolimus vs. cyclosporin, despite the presence of microcytic anemia in the sirolimus patients, which was not improved with oral iron supplementation (13). However, prohepcidin levels correlate poorly with total body iron status in comparison with mature hepcidin-25 (30). A 2021 pediatric case-control study found no difference in IL-6, hepcidin or ferritin levels in 17 children with tuberous sclerosis complex treated with everolimus compared to 47 controls (23). IL-6 levels were also measured in the patients prior to commencing everolimus and at 3, 6 and 12 months with no significant elevation with introduction of everolimus (23). IL-6 levels were similarly elevated in both our treatment groups, compared to data derived from healthy adults (31), indicating similar levels of inflammation and suggesting this pathway does not contribute to impaired hemopoiesis.
mTOR inhibitors have been shown to inhibit the EPO signaling pathway at the level of EPO receptor signaling (32). In the presence of EPO, the EPO receptor activates multiple phosphorylating enzymes, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-K) which leads to eventual activation of P70S6 kinase with subsequent protein synthesis and cell proliferation (32). mTOR inhibitors are potent inhibitors of P70S6 kinase (33–35). This direct effect on the EPO pathway may explain the previously demonstrated effect of mTOR inhibitors on red cell indices that are disproportionate to their effects on other aspects of bone marrow function. Augustine et al. provided data in support of mTOR inhibitor-induced EPO resistance, demonstrating a fall in EPO resistance when switching 25 stable RTR from sirolimus to MMF (erythropoietin:Hb ratio 2.7 on sirolimus, to 1.2 on MMF (where Hb was measured in g/dL) (14). Our study confirms and extends the observations of Augustine et al., demonstrating elevated EPO levels in the mTOR inhibitor group with similar Hb to the tacrolimus group.
Our study is limited by the small sample size in both our cases and controls and the variable use of sirolimus and everolimus in our cases. The different immunosuppressive regimens used in each group and the two cases of active inflammation in our mTOR inhibitor group are potentially confounding variables that reflect real-world practice with these complex patients. The absence of anemia and microcytosis in this cohort requires these results to be extrapolated to be applied to this cohort as an explanation for this phenomenon. This may have been due to sample size, duration of drug exposure or the target levels achieved being below a threshold for effect. Cases were significantly longer post-transplant than controls which may have influenced results, however, this did not result in a differences in age or allograft function.
In conclusion, higher levels of EPO in the absence of deranged iron biochemistry or hepcidin-25 levels suggest that EPO resistance rather than impaired iron metabolism may contribute to impaired haemopoiesis previously demonstrated in RTR on mTOR therapy.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by South Metropolitan Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
HP, JO, AK, AI, and RS designed the study and recruited participants. RJ was responsible for data collection and tabulation and authored the manuscript. JO performed statistics. All authors contributed to interpretation of the data and editing of the manuscript.
Funding
This project received funding from a Spinnaker Health Research Foundation grant.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Joel Gummer, Edith Cowan University, for his assistance in performing the hepcidin assay and Trevor Mori, University of Western Australia, for his assistance in performing the IL-6 assay.
References
1. Vanrenterghem Y, Ponticelli C, Morales JM, Abramowicz D, Baboolal K, Eklund B, et al. Prevalence and management of anemia in renal transplant recipients: a European survey. Am J Transplant. (2003) 3:835–45. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00133.x
2. Winkelmayer WC, Chandraker A, Alan Brookhart M, Kramar R, Sunder-Plassmann G. A prospective study of anaemia and long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2006) 21:3559–66. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl457
3. Yorgin PD, Scandling JD, Belson A, Sanchez J, Alexander SR, Andreoni KA. Late post-transplant anemia in adult renal transplant recipients. An under-recognized problem? Am J Transplant. (2002) 2:429. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20506.x
4. Augustine JJ, Knauss TC, Schulak JA, Bodziak KA, Siegel C, Hricik DE. Comparative effects of sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil on erythropoiesis in kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant. (2004) 4:2001–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00612.x
5. Ekberg H, Bernasconi C, Nöldeke J, Yussim A, Mjörnstedt L, Erken U, et al. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus and sirolimus retain their distinct toxicity profiles despite low doses in the Symphony study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2010) 25:2004–10. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp778
6. Morelon E, MamzerBruneel M, Peraldi M, Kreis H. Sirolimus: a new promising immunosuppressive drug. Towards a rationale for its use in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2001) 16:18–20. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.1.18
7. Thaunat O, Beaumont C, Chatenoud L, Lechaton S, Mamzer-Bruneel M-F, Varet B, et al. Anemia after late introduction of sirolimus may correlate with biochemical evidence of a chronic inflammatory state. Transplantation. (2005) 80:1212–9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000179106.07382.6a
8. Nemeth E, Tuttle MS, Powelson J, Vaughn MB, Donovan A, Ward DM, et al. Hepcidin regulates cellular iron efflux by binding to ferroportin and inducing its internalization. Science. (2004) 306:2090. doi: 10.1126/science.1104742
9. Nicolas G, Bennoun M, Devaux I, Beaumont C, Grandchamp B, Kahn A, et al. Lack of hepcidin gene expression and severe tissue iron overload in upstream stimulatory factor 2 (USF2) knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2001) 98:8780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151179498
10. Nicolas G, Bennoun M, Porteu A, Mativet S, Beaumont C, Grandchamp B, et al. Severe iron deficiency anemia in transgenic mice expressing liver hepcidin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2002) 99:4596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072632499
11. Schmidt PJ. Regulation of Iron Metabolism by Hepcidin under Conditions of Inflammation. J Biol Chem. (2015) 290:18975. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.650150
12. Wrighting DM, Andrews NC. Interleukin-6 induces hepcidin expression through STAT3. Blood. (2006) 108:3204. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-027631
13. Maiorano PA, Stallone PG, Schena PA, Infante PB, Pontrelli PP, Schena PF, et al. Sirolimus interferes with iron homeostasis in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. (2006) 82:908–12. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000235545.49391.1b
14. Augustine JJ, Rodriguez AV, Padiyar AA, Bodziak EK, Schulak EJ, Hricik ED. Reduction in erythropoietin resistance after conversion from sirolimus to enteric coated mycophenolate sodium. Transplantation. (2008) 86:548–53. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181814a96
15. Sofroniadou S, Kassimatis T, Goldsmith D. Anaemia, microcytosis and sirolimus—is iron the missing link? Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2010) 25:1667–75. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp674
16. Nguyen LS, Vautier M, Allenbach Y, Zahr N, Benveniste O, Funck-Brentano C, et al. Sirolimus and mTOR inhibitors: a review of side effects and specific management in solid organ transplantation. Drug Safety. (2019) 42:813–25. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00810-9
17. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. (2009) 150:604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
19. Gummer J, Trengove R, Pascoe EM, Badve SV, Cass A, Clarke P, et al. Association between serum hepcidin-25 and primary resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chronic kidney disease: a secondary analysis of the HERO trial. Nephrology. (2017) 22:548–54. doi: 10.1111/nep.12815
20. Litton E, Baker S, Erber W, Farmer S, Ferrier J, French C, et al. Hepcidin predicts response to IV iron therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a nested cohort study. J Intens Care. (2018) 6:60. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0328-2
21. Mead MK, Claus M, Litton E, Smart L, Raisis A, Rossi G, et al. Identification of The Canidae iron regulatory hormone hepcidin. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:19400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55009-w
22. Diekmann F, Rovira J, Diaz-Ricart M, Arellano EM, Vodenik B, Jou JM, et al. mTOR inhibition and erythropoiesis: microcytosis or anaemia? Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2012) 27:537–41. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr318
23. Jakubowska J, Pawlik B, Wyka K, Stolarska M, Kotulska K, Józwiak S, et al. New insights into red blood cell microcytosis upon mtor inhibitor administration. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:6802. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136802
24. Carta P, Bigazzi B, Buti E, Antognoli G, Di Maria L, Caroti L, et al. Anemia and immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplanted patients: single-center retrospective study. Transplant Proc. (2016) 48:337–9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.054
25. Ashby DR, Gale DP, Busbridge M, Murphy KG, Duncan ND, Cairns TD, et al. Erythropoietin administration in humans causes a marked and prolonged reduction in circulating hepcidin. Haematologica. (2010) 95:505. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.013136
26. Lainé F, Laviolle B, Ropert M, Bouguen G, Morcet J, Hamon C, et al. Early effects of erythropoietin on serum hepcidin and serum iron bioavailability in healthy volunteers. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2012) 112:1391–7. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2097-7
27. Pinto JP, Ribeiro S, Pontes H, Thowfeequ S, Tosh D, Carvalho F, et al. Erythropoietin mediates hepcidin expression in hepatocytes through EPOR signaling and regulation of C/EBPalpha. Blood. (2008) 111:5727. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-106195
28. Robach P, Recalcati S, Girelli D, Campostrini N, Kempf T, Wollert KC, et al. Serum hepcidin levels and muscle iron proteins in humans injected with low- or high-dose erythropoietin. Eur J Haematol. (2013) 91:74–84. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12122
29. Przybylowski P, Malyszko JS, Macdougall IC, Malyszko J. Iron metabolism, hepcidin, and anemia in orthotopic heart transplantation recipients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin. Transplant Proc. (2013) 45:387–90. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.02.040
30. Thaunat O, Beaumont C, Lechaton S, Kreis H, Morelon E. Late introduction of sirolimus induces anemia in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. (2007) 83:1283. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000260424.75005.c1
31. Said EA, Al-Reesi I, Al-Shizawi N, Jaju S, Al-Balushi MS, Koh CY, et al. Defining IL-6 levels in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Med Virol. (2020) 93:3915–24. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26654
32. Bouscary D, Pene F, Claessens Y-E, Muller O, Chrétien S, Fontenay-Roupie M, et al. Critical role for PI 3-kinase in the control of erythropoietin-induced erythroid progenitor proliferation. Blood. (2003) 101:3436. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2332
33. Calvin JK, Jongkyeong C, David FF, Flanagan WM, John B, Gerald RC. Rapamycin selectively inhibits interleukin-2 activation of p70 S6 kinase. Nature. (1992) 358:70. doi: 10.1038/358070a0
34. Chung J, Kuo CJ, Crabtree GR, Blenis J. Rapamycin-FKBP specifically blocks growth-dependent activation of and signaling by the 70 kd S6 protein kinases. Cell. (1992) 69:1227–36. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90643-Q
Keywords: renal transplant, mTOR inhibitor, anemia, iron deficiency, hepcidin, erythropoietin, erythropoietin resistance
Citation: Jefferies R, Puttagunta H, Krishnan A, Irish A, Swaminathan R and Olynyk JK (2022) mTOR Inhibitors Induce Erythropoietin Resistance in Renal Transplant Recipients. Front. Med. 9:722058. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.722058
Received: 08 June 2021; Accepted: 27 January 2022;
Published: 22 February 2022.
Edited by:
Yogesh M. Scindia, University of Florida, United StatesReviewed by:
Gaurav Gupta, Virginia Commonwealth University, United StatesNikola Stefanović, University of Niš, Serbia
Copyright © 2022 Jefferies, Puttagunta, Krishnan, Irish, Swaminathan and Olynyk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Reece Jefferies, cmVlY2UuamVmZmVyaWVzJiN4MDAwNDA7aGVhbHRoLndhLmdvdi5hdQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship