Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Med., 23 November 2022
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Postoperative Care: from Pain Management to Delirium View all 16 articles

Post-operative delirium in the patient with hip fracture: The journey from hospital arrival to discharge

\r\nDanielle Ní Chrinín,*Danielle Ní Chróinín1,2*Alwin Chuan,,Alwin Chuan1,2,3
  • 1Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
  • 2South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
  • 3Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia

Delirium- an acute disorder of attention and cognition- is the commonest complication following hip fracture. Patients with hip fracture are particularly vulnerable to delirium, and many of the lessons from the care of the patient with hip fracture will extend to other surgical cohorts. Prevention and management of delirium for patients presenting with hip fracture, extending along a continuum from arrival through to the post-operative setting. Best practice guidelines emphasize multidisciplinary care including management by an orthogeriatric service, regular delirium screening, and multimodal interventions. The evidence base for prevention is strongest in terms of multifaceted interventions, while once delirium has set in, early recognition and identification of the cause are key. Integration of effective strategies is often suboptimal, and may be supported by approaches such as interactive teaching methodologies, routine feedback, and clear protocol dissemination. Partnering with patients and carers will support person centered care, improve patient experiences, and may improve outcomes. Ongoing work needs to focus on implementing recognized best practice, in order to minimize the health, social and economic costs of delirium.

Main body

“He’s been up all night. He was terrified.” The patient’s daughter looked as tired as her father, who was snoring now in his bed on our orthopedic ward. Further questioning revealed an exhausting night of agitation, attempted climbing from bed, hallucinations, and intravenous catheters being pulled out by the distressed patient. Despite the brightness of the sunlight streaming through the window, he was now barely rousable, grunting when moved, and had missed his breakfast and morning oral medications.

Sadly, this picture of delirium- an acute disorder of attention and cognition- is common on orthopedic and other hospital wards. The journey of a patient with hip fracture in many ways epitomizes that of the surgical patient at risk of delirium. These patients are older, have fallen, are often frail, and many have underlying cognitive impairment. Here in Australia, almost 1 in 3 is resident in a residential aged care facility (nursing home) even prior to surgery (1), and the recognized 30–40% with existing dementia or cognitive impairment likely under-estimates the true number, due to suboptimal assessment (2). Patients with underlying cognitive impairment are 3 times more likely to sustain a hip fracture than those without (3), and are at increased risk of delirium (4, 5). Rates of delirium vary, with reports of up to 65% of patients experiencing delirium following hip fracture (6). It is the commonest complication following hip fracture, yet more than 30% of delirium is likely to be preventable, including in hip fracture cohorts (4, 7, 8), making it a critical and attainable target. Nonetheless, the pathophysiology of delirium, in the post-operative context or otherwise- remains poorly understood, with neuro-inflammation and cerebral metabolic insufficiency being the two most-favored theories explaining the predisposing and trigger events leading to delirium onset (8, 9).

The negative sequelae of delirium- and thus the potential advantages to delirium prevention- encompass the patient, hospital, and society. Delirium is commonly associated with increased hospital LOS, in multiple studies of hip fracture and other surgical/trauma patients, including in a recently published large retrospective analysis of > 4,000 patients from the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) (10). A US paper noted that delirium was one of the two most notable predictors of prolonged LOS in hip fracture patients (the other being delayed time to surgery) (11). Delirium is also associated with increased risk of in-patient falls, mortality, and future risk of dementia, and with significant distress for patients and family members (1215). The total costs of delirium in Australia, however, extend beyond easily-captured health system costs; including other financial costs (such as productivity costs, informal care) and that associated with burden of disease and loss of well-being, total annual cost has been estimated to be in the order of AUD$8.8 billion (2016–2017 data) (16), which, with 132,595 occurrences of delirium in Australia alone each year, would mean that each occurrence of delirium would cost approximately AUD$66,000.

Delirium prevention begins at the time of the patient’s arrival. Early orthogeriatrician input and comprehensive geriatric assessment are likely to improve outcomes, including reducing delirium incidence and severity (1720). Best practice guidelines such as the Australian Hip Fracture Care Clinical Care Standard highlight that care at presentation, in addition to diagnostics, should include pain control, assessment of medical reasons for the fall, exclusion of other injuries- including head injury- and specifically highlight the need to “screen for cognitive impairment and risk factors for delirium and put in place interventions to prevent delirium based on this assessment” (21). Comprehensive geriatric assessment commonly incorporates assessment of medical (co-)morbidity, drugs and polypharmacy, cognition, mobility, function, social circumstances, and establishing goals of care. Such assessment is potentially associated with reduced post-operative delirium, improved delirium diagnosis, and reduction in other post-operative complications (17, 22, 23), which may contribute to delirium. Ideally, such an orthogeriatric approach to care should be instituted from admission.

Existing evidence-based guidelines and recommendations note the importance of early cognitive assessment, delirium risk screening and prevention of ‘preventable’ delirium (2, 21, 24). Yet data consistently highlight that cognitive screening amongst patients with hip fracture remains sub-optimal (2, 25). Tools such as the Delirium Risk Assessment Tool can help identify patients at highest risk (26, 27), and facilitate focused risk management plans. In addition to this, validated screening instruments [e.g., 4AT, Confusion Assessment Methods (CAM)] should be employed to assist in detection, in conjunction with appropriated cognitive screening tools where needed (2830). Specific patient cohorts, such as those from culturally or linguistically diverse backgrounds, or Aboriginal and Indigenous patients, may benefit from culturally appropriate cognitive assessment (3133). In patients who are unwell or cognitively impaired, the need for a collateral history is paramount (34, 35). However, evidence suggests that collateral history from family/carer is often neglected- being either absent or sparse- with Fitzpatrick et al. (34) highlighting that it is “alarming that such an essential component of clinical assessment is so often disregarded.” In addition to screening for and recognition of delirium, proactive avoidance of triggers- such as constipation, urinary retention and catheterization and deliriogenic medications- and timely pain assessment and management are key in the patient with hip fracture (21, 36, 37). The benefit of addressing delirium risk factors is highlighted by multifaceted interventions which target these risks. For example, data from the wider in-patient population have shown reduced delirium incidence- and other adverse outcomes such as falls- with the Hospital Elder Life Program, which focuses on cognitive impairment, sleep deprivation, immobilization, visual impairment, hearing impairment and dehydration (38, 39).

Despite guidelines recommending early pain assessment (18, 19), early and repeated pain assessment remains suboptimal (2, 40). Along with regular assessment, pain control may require a multimodal approach from amongst simple analgesics, anti-inflammatories in appropriate patients, opiates with appropriate monitoring, and regional nerve blocks such as fascia-iliaca block (FIB) (19, 41). Analgesic-centric multicomponent bundles of care have been associated with reductions in early post-operative delirium amongst patients with hip fracture (42).

In contrast to the relatively strong evidence for addressing delirium risk factors either side of surgery, intra-operative factors have been less convincingly associated with post-operative delirium. In the setting of an imperfect evidence base, regional anesthesia does not seem to confer any delirium-reduction benefits over general anesthetic, although potential advantages in terms of adverse events, hospital length-of-view and even mobilization were identified in a small number of studies (43, 44). Duration of surgery may be associated with increased risk (45). Similarly, despite theoretical advantages, lighter sedation during surgery has not been convincingly associated with delirium risk (46), and the question of whether higher-dose propofol might contribute to post-operative delirium risk remains unanswered (47). On the other hand, the need for intensive care and/or ventilator care post-operatively are likely to increase risk, as demonstrated by a large Brazilian study of almost 60,000 hip fracture patients who underwent regional anesthesia (48).

The principles of pre-operative delirium prevention, assessment and management extend to the post-operative phase. Early, coordinated orthogeriatric and multidisciplinary input aims to reduce post-operative complications in addition to providing benefits regarding care coordination. Nurses will play a vital role in the post-operative phase of the patient’s recovery. Factors which will continue to impact on delirium risk in this post-operative will include management of pain, minimizing polypharmacy, rationalizing medications, and avoiding (or planned earliest removal of) invasive devices such as urinary catheters (4, 38, 49, 50). Given the fluctuant course of delirium, and the prolonged post-operative risks for same in hip fracture cohorts, patients should be monitored regularly for cognitive, behavioral, and clinical deterioration; some guidelines suggest that all in-patients should be assessed at least daily (51). The regular assessment of pain assessment and effective analgesic management are critical to post-operative care (21), both to improve the patient’s quality of life and comfort, and reduce delirium risk. For patients with cognitive impairment/dementia, many tools have been developed. Tools such as the Faces Pain Scale, Abbey Pain Scale and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD), Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate and Mobilization-Observation-Behavior-Intensity-Dementia (MOBID) scale may be useful in such cohorts (52). Pain management is likely to require a multifaceted approach, including systemic analgesia using paracetamol and short-acting opioid analgesics, aiming to minimize dosage and duration so as to reduce opioid-associated harm (53). A systematic review (2011) has previously indicated that the evidence for strategies such as acupressure, relaxation therapy, transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation, and physical therapy regimens, is inconclusive (54).

Early mobilization is also promoted for patients following hip fracture, to promote recovery of mobility and function and mobility. Mobility is also promoted for patients in terms of delirium prevention (51). However, its potential relationship to delirium prevention in hip fracture patients is complex. Nonetheless, a recent study highlighted that those who mobilized early post-operatively had reduced (post-operative) delirium compared to those who remained bedbound (55), and delirium itself can often be a barrier to early mobilization (55, 56). Early mobilization is associated with improved likelihood of discharge by 30 days, irrespective of delirium status (57).

In patients who do develop delirium, management must focus on the identification of the cause, as well as prevention of complications, such as functional decline, dehydration, malnutrition, falls and pressure injuries, based on their risk (26). Partnering with patients and carers will support person centered care, improve patient experiences, and may improve outcomes (58, 59).

Principles which support a multidisciplinary approach to delirium prevention and pain management need to be embedded in local pathways for the care of patients with hip fracture, complemented by audit and quality improvement initiatives (18, 19). Strategies such as bundles of care have been associated with improved compliance with recommended delirium-reducing strategies (42), clinician support for their implementation (60), as well as with direct benefits in terms of incidence of post-operative delirium (9, 42). Yet the integration of models of care to support best practice is often suboptimal (61). Potential enablers of such integration might, for example, include interactive teaching methodologies, routine individualized feedback, and clear protocol dissemination (60, 6266), while barriers may include educational deficits, lack of motivation at individual or institutional levels, environmental factors, and specific health professional characteristics such as age, sex or experience (67, 68). Translation of evidence into practice will need to account for local factors specific to the individual setting and local population. Furthermore, newer educational methods such as the “flipped classroom” and “train the trainer” approaches may enhance delirium learning for healthcare professionals, with a study by Sockalingam et al. (65) showing persistent benefit in delirium knowledge and delirium care self-efficacy at 6 months following institution of these strategies, and a mixed-methods study identifying that a delirium simulation-based flipped classroom approach “promoted higher level learning and engagement in inter-professional collaborative practice” (66). Hunter et al note that “dynamic, responsive implementation strategies and accessible educational modalities, which are flexible to needs of individual multidisciplinary team members and adapted to specific settings, will likely prove the most successful approach to adoption of evidence-based protocols [supporting hip fracture care]” (60).

Conclusion

In conclusion, patients presenting to hospital with hip fractures are at high risk of developing delirium. Patients who do develop delirium suffer significantly worse outcomes including death and morbidity, and delirium leads to increased suffering to carers and family, and imposes a large financial burden on the health system. Best practice guidelines emphasize multidisciplinary care including management by an orthogeriatric service, regular delirium screening, and multimodal interventions. Up to 30% of hip fracture-related delirium may be preventable with this approach. The health, social and economic burden of delirium underscore the need for research focusing on reducing the incidence and impact of delirium in our patients with hip fracture.

Author contributions

DN and AC were responsible for drafting, editing, and finalization of the manuscript. Both authors agreed to be accountable for the content of the work, contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry. Bi-National Annual Report of Hip Fracture Care 2018. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry. (2018). Accessed online at: https://anzhfr.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/1164/2021/08/2018-ANZHFR-Annual-Report-FULL-FINAL.pdf (accessed September 30, 2022).

Google Scholar

2. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry. Annual Report of Hip Fracture Care 2021. (2021). Accessed online at: https://anzhfr.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/1164/2021/12/ANZHFR-2021-Annual-Report_print-version.pdf (accessed September 30, 2022).

Google Scholar

3. Baker NL, Cook MN, Arrighi HM, Bullock R. Hip fracture risk and subsequent mortality among Alzheimer’s disease patients in the United Kingdom, 1988-2007. Age Ageing. (2011) 40:49–54. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet (Lond Engl). (2014) 383:911–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ruel M, Boussat B, Boudissa M, Garnier V, Bioteau C, Tonetti J, et al. Management of preoperative pain in elderly patients with moderate to severe cognitive deficits and hip fracture: a retrospective, monocentric study in an orthogeriatric unit. BMC Geriatr. (2021) 21:575. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02500-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Inouye SK. Delirium after hip fracture: to be or not to be? J Am Geriatr Soc. (2001) 49:678–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49133.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Deeken F, Sánchez A, Rapp MA, Denkinger M, Brefka S, Spank J, et al. Outcomes of a delirium prevention program in older persons after elective surgery: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. (2022) 157:e216370. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6370

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Chuan A, Sanders RD. The use of dexmedetomidine to prevent delirium after major cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. (2021) 76:1296–9. doi: 10.1111/anae.15494

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lam D, Wang C, Lee A, Chung YF, Lau TW, Fang C, et al. Multi-component care bundle in geriatric fracture hip for reducing post-operative delirium. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. (2021) 12:21514593211004530. doi: 10.1177/21514593211004530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Oberai T, Woodman R, Laver K, Crotty M, Kerkhoffs G, Jaarsma R. Is delirium associated with negative outcomes in older patients with hip fracture: analysis of the 4904 patients 2017-2018 from the Australian and New Zealand hip fracture registry. ANZ J Surg. (2022) 92:200–5. doi: 10.1111/ans.17421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hecht G, Slee CA, Goodell PB, Taylor SL, Wolinsky PR. Predictive modeling for geriatric hip fracture patients: early surgery and delirium have the largest influence on length of stay. J Am Acad Orthopaed Surg. (2019) 27:e293–300. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Caplan GA, Teodorczuk A, Streatfeild J, Agar MR. The financial and social costs of delirium. Eur Geriatr Med. (2020) 11:105–12. doi: 10.1007/s41999-019-00257-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. He S, Rolls K, Stott K, Shekhar R, Vueti V, Flowers K, et al. Does delirium prevention reduce risk of in-patient falls among older adults? A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis. Aust J Ageing. (2022) 41:396–406. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Finucane AM, Lugton J, Kennedy C, Spiller JA. The experiences of caregivers of patients with delirium, and their role in its management in palliative care settings: an integrative literature review. Psychooncology. (2017) 26:291–300. doi: 10.1002/pon.4140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Racine AM, D’Aquila M, Schmitt EM, Gallagher J, Marcantonio ER, Jones RN, et al. Delirium burden in patients and family caregivers: development and testing of new instruments. Gerontologist. (2019) 59:e393–402. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Pezzullo L, Streatfeild J, Hickson J, Teodorczuk A, Agar MR, Caplan GA. Economic impact of delirium in Australia: a cost of illness study. BMJ Open. (2019) 9:e027514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Shields L, Henderson V, Caslake R. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for prevention of delirium after hip fracture: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2017) 65:1559–65. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14846

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry. Australian and New Zealand Guideline for Hip Fracture Care, Improving Outcomes in Hip Fracture Management of Adults. Sydney, NSW: ANZHFR (2014).

Google Scholar

19. National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness. Hip Fracture: Management. Clinical Guideline [CG124]. (2011). Accessed online at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/chapter/Recommendation (accessed October 4, 2022)

Google Scholar

20. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM. Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2001) 49:516–22. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49108.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Hip Fracture Care Clinical Care Standard [Internet]. Sydney, NSW: ACSQHC (2016).

Google Scholar

22. Eamer G, Taheri A, Chen SS, Daviduck Q, Chambers T, Shi X, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older people admitted to a surgical service. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018) 1:CD012485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012485.pub2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Veronese N, Custodero C, Demurtas J, Smith L, Barbagallo M, Maggi S, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older people: an umbrella review of health outcomes. Age Ageing. (2022) 51:afac104. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Pendlebury ST, Klaus SP, Mather M, de Brito M, Wharton RM. Routine cognitive screening in older patients admitted to acute medicine: abbreviated mental test score (AMTS) and subjective memory complaint versus montreal cognitive assessment and IQCODE. Age Ageing. (2015) 44:1000–5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Mutchie HL, Albrecht JS, Orwig DL, Huang Y, Boscardin WJ, Hochberg MC, et al. Differential misclassification of cognitive impairment by sex among hip fracture patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2022) 70:838–45. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Agency for Clinical Innovation. Care of the Confused Hospitalised Older Persons (CHOPS), Key Principles. Sydney, NSW: Agency for Clinical Innovation (2020).

Google Scholar

27. Agency for Clinical Innovation. Care of the Confused Hospitalised Older Person, Delirium risk assessment [Internet]. Sydney, NSW: Agency for Clinical Innovation (2020).

Google Scholar

28. MacLullich A. 4AT - Rapid Clinical Test for Delirium Detection [Internet]. (2020). Accessed online at: www.the4AT.com (accessed September 30, 2022)

Google Scholar

29. MacLullich AM, Shenkin SD, Goodacre S, Godfrey M, Hanley J, Stíobhairt A, et al. The 4 ‘A’s test for detecting delirium in acute medical patients: a diagnostic accuracy study. Health Technol Assess (Winchester Engl). (2019) 23:1–194. doi: 10.3310/hta23400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. (1990) 113:941–8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Storey JE, Rowland JT, Basic D, Conforti DA, Dickson HG. The rowland universal dementia assessment scale (RUDAS): a multicultural cognitive assessment scale. Int Psychogeriatr. (2004) 16:13–31. doi: 10.1017/s1041610204000043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. LoGiudice D, Smith K, Thomas J, Lautenschlager NT, Almeida OP, Atkinson D, et al. Kimberley indigenous cognitive assessment tool (KICA): development of a cognitive assessment tool for older indigenous Australians. Int Psychogeriatr. (2006) 18:269–80. doi: 10.1017/S1041610205002681

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. LoGiudice D, Strivens E, Smith K, Stevenson M, Atkinson D, Dwyer A, et al. The KICA screen: the psychometric properties of a shortened version of the KICA (Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment). Aust J Ageing. (2011) 30:215–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00486.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Fitzpatrick D, Doyle K, Finn G, Gallagher P. The collateral history: an overlooked core clinical skill. Eur Geriatr Med. (2020) 11:1003–7. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00367-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Dyer AH, Foley T, O’Shea B, Kennelly SP. Cognitive assessment of older adults in general practice: the collateral history. Irish J Med Sci. (2018) 187:683–7. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1723-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults. American geriatrics society abstracted clinical practice guideline for postoperative delirium in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2015) 63:142–50. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, et al. European society of anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. (2017) 34:192–214. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr., Charpentier PA, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford TR, et al. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. (1999) 340:669–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Hshieh TT, Yang T, Gartaganis SL, Yue J, Inouye SK. Hospital elder life program: systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2018) 26:1015–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness. 2019 Surveillance of Hip fracture: Management (NICE Guideline CG124). (2019). Accessed online at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/resources/2019-surveillance-of-hip-fracture-management-nice-guideline-cg124-pdf-9025317437173 (accessed October 4, 2022)

Google Scholar

41. Sanzone AG. Use of nonopioid analgesics and the impact on patient outcomes. J Orthop Trauma. (2016) 30(Suppl. 1):S12–5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000563

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Chuan A, Zhao L, Tillekeratne N, Alani S, Middleton PM, Harris IA, et al. The effect of a multidisciplinary care bundle on the incidence of delirium after hip fracture surgery: a quality improvement study. Anaesthesia. (2020) 75:63–71. doi: 10.1111/anae.14840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Patel V, Champaneria R, Dretzke J, Yeung J. Effect of regional versus general anaesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture: a systematic review. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e020757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020757

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Li T, Li J, Yuan L, Wu J, Jiang C, Daniels J, et al. Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on incidence of postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: the RAGA randomized trial. JAMA. (2022) 327:50–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Ravi B, Pincus D, Choi S, Jenkinson R, Wasserstein DN, Redelmeier DA. Association of duration of surgery with postoperative delirium among patients receiving hip fracture repair. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2:e190111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Sieber FE, Neufeld KJ, Gottschalk A, Bigelow GE, Oh ES, Rosenberg PB, et al. Effect of depth of sedation in older patients undergoing hip fracture repair on postoperative delirium: the STRIDE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. (2018) 153:987–95. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Whitlock EL, Finlayson E. Depth of propofol sedation and postoperative delirium. JAMA Surg. (2018) 153:996. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Ahn EJ, Bang SR. Risk factors associated with treatment of hyperactive postoperative delirium in elderly patients following hip fracture surgery under regional anesthesia: a nationwide population-based study. Brazil J Anesthesiol (Elsevier). (2022) 72:213–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Greer N, Rossom R, Anderson P, MacDonald R, Tacklind J, Rutks I, et al. Delirium: Screening, Prevention, and Diagnosis – A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Washington, DC: United States Department of Veterans Affairs (2011).

Google Scholar

50. Inouye SK. Prevention of delirium in hospitalized older patients: risk factors and targeted intervention strategies. Ann Med. (2000) 32:257–63. doi: 10.3109/07853890009011770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Delirium Care Clinical Care Standard [Internet]. Sydney, NSW: ACSQHC (2021).

Google Scholar

52. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Faculty of Pain Medicine. Acute-Pain-Management-Scientific-Evidence. 5th-edit. Sydney, NSW: ANZCA (2020).

Google Scholar

53. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Opioid Analgesic Stewardship in Acute Pain Clinical Care Standard 2022 [Internet]. Sydney, NSW: ACSQH (2022).

Google Scholar

54. Abou-Setta AM, Beaupre LA, Rashiq S, Dryden DM, Hamm MP, Sadowski CA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of pain management interventions for hip fracture: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. (2011) 155:234–45. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Kenyon-Smith T, Nguyen E, Oberai T, Jarsma R. Early mobilization post-hip fracture surgery. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. (2019) 10:2151459319826431. doi: 10.1177/2151459319826431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Said CM, Delahunt M, Ciavarella V, Al Maliki D, Boys AM, Vogrin S, et al. Factors impacting early mobilization following hip fracture: an observational study. J Geriatr Phys Ther. (2021) 44:88–93. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, et al. Discharge after hip fracture surgery in relation to mobilisation timing by patient characteristics: linked secondary analysis of the UK National hip fracture database. BMC Geriatr. (2021) 21:694. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02624-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Agency for Clinical Innovation. Care of the Confused Hospitalised Older Person, Resources and Useful Links [Internet]. Sydney, NSW: Agency for Clinical Innovation (2020).

Google Scholar

59. Clinical excellence Commission. Partnering with Patients, Top 5 Initiative. (2014). Accessed online at: https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/192672/TOP-5-Flyer.pdf (accessed October 14, 2022).

Google Scholar

60. Hunter CL, Ni Chroinin D, McEvoy L, Chuan A. Delirium reduction by analgesia management in hip fracture surgery (DRAM-HF): exploration of perceived facilitators and barriers. Aust J Ageing. (2021) 40:e332–40. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Dale S, Levi C, Ward J, Grimshaw JM, Jammali-Blasi A, D’Este C, et al. Barriers and enablers to implementing clinical treatment protocols for fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in the quality in acute stroke care (QASC) project–a mixed methods study. World Evid Based Nurs. (2015) 12:41–50. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Knops AM, Storm-Versloot MN, Mank AP, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Bossuyt PM, et al. Factors influencing long-term adherence to two previously implemented hospital guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. (2010) 22:421–9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Informat Decision Making. (2008) 8:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-38

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Zwerver F, Schellart AJ, Knol DL, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. An implementation strategy to improve the guideline adherence of insurance physicians: an experiment in a controlled setting. Implement Sci. (2011) 6:131. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Sockalingam S, James SL, Sinyi R, Carroll A, Laidlaw J, Yanofsky R, et al. A flipped classroom approach to improving the quality of delirium care using an interprofessional train-the-trainer program. J Cont Educ Health Profess. (2016) 36:17–23. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Shikino K, Ide N, Kubota Y, Ishii I, Ito S, Ikusaka M, et al. Effective situation-based delirium simulation training using flipped classroom approach to improve interprofessional collaborative practice competency: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ. (2022) 22:408. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03484-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation-a scoping review. Healthcare (Basel Switzerland). (2016) 4:36. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Ní Chróinín D, Ní Chróinín C, Beveridge A. Factors influencing deprescribing habits among geriatricians. Age Ageing. (2015) 44:704–8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: delirium, post-operative, hip fracture, prevention, multidisciplinary, acute confusional state, cognitive impairment

Citation: Ní Chróinín D and Chuan A (2022) Post-operative delirium in the patient with hip fracture: The journey from hospital arrival to discharge. Front. Med. 9:1080253. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1080253

Received: 26 October 2022; Accepted: 04 November 2022;
Published: 23 November 2022.

Edited by:

Zhongheng Zhang, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Paolo Fabbietti, National Institute of Science and Health for Aging (IRCCS), Italy

Copyright © 2022 Ní Chróinín and Chuan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Danielle Ní Chróinín, Danielle.NiChroinin@health.nsw.gov.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.