
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Med. , 28 October 2022
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1054415
This article is a correction to:
Case Series: Video-Assisted Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery During Pregnancy
A corrigendum on
Case series: Video-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery during pregnancy
by Lu, A., Ye, Y., Hu, J., Wei, N., Wei, J., Lin, B., and Wang, S. (2021). Front. Med. 8:781690. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.781690
In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. The correct data should be yes for the pulsatile perfusion in case 4. The corrected and its caption appear below.
In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. The Extubation time after surgery in Case no. 1 should be “7” h, and the Blood transfusion for Case no. 2 should be “2U blood transfusion.” The corrected Table 3 and its caption appear below.
In the published article, there was an error. A correction has been made to Perioperative management strategy, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“Sevoflurane, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium were used for anesthetic maintenance with certain level of Nacrotrend Bis values between 40 and 60.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Sevoflurane, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium were used for anesthetic maintenance with certain level of Nacrotrend values between 40 and 60.”
In the published article, there was an error.
A correction has been made to Perioperative management strategy, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“After heparinization, a 24 Fr venous cannula and 19 Fr arterial cannula were placed in the right femoral vein and artery.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“After heparinization, venous cannula and arterial cannula were placed in the right femoral vein and artery.”
In the published article, there was an error. A correction has been made to Perioperative management strategy, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“the thoracoscopy was inserted via the 5th intercostal space.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“the thoracoscopy was inserted via the 4th or 5th intercostal space.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), video-assisted, pregnancy, cardiopulmonary bypass, perioperative management
Citation: Lu A, Ye Y, Hu J, Wei N, Wei J, Lin B and Wang S (2022) Corrigendum: Case series: Video-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery during pregnancy. Front. Med. 9:1054415. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1054415
Received: 26 September 2022; Accepted: 11 October 2022;
Published: 28 October 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Ata Murat Kaynar, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Copyright © 2022 Lu, Ye, Hu, Wei, Wei, Lin and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sheng Wang, c2hlbmd3YW5nX2d6QDE2My5jb20=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.