In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. The correct data should be yes for the pulsatile perfusion in case 4. The corrected and its caption appear below.
Table 2
| Case no. | Intervention | Intubation | Total operation time (minutes) | CPB time (minutes) | Aortic cross-clamp time (minutes) | Lowest core temperature (°C) | Pulsatile perfusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitral valve replacement | Double lumen tube | 145 | 75 | 47 | 36.0 | Yes |
| 2 | Mitral valve replacement | Single lumen tube | 165 | 92 | 64 | 36.0 | Yes |
| 3 | Mitral valvuloplasty | Double lumen tube | 170 | 88 | 68 | 36.0 | Yes |
| 4 | Mitral valve replacement | Double lumen tube | 133 | 67 | 43 | 36.0 | Yes |
| 5 | Left atrial myxoma excision | Double lumen tube | 135 | 46 | 21 | 35.7 | No |
Intraoperative information of five patients undergoing MICS during pregnancy.
In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. The Extubation time after surgery in Case no. 1 should be “7” h, and the Blood transfusion for Case no. 2 should be “2U blood transfusion.” The corrected Table 3 and its caption appear below.
Table 3
| Case no. | Extubation time after surgery (hours) | Complication | Blood transfusion | Length of stay (days) | Maternal mortality | Gestational age when pregnancy termination (weeks) | Fetal outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | No | No | 11 | No | 20 | Abortion |
| 2 | 5 | No | 2U RBC | 13 | No | 35 | Abortion due to fetal cerebral anomaly |
| 3 | 5 | No | No | 18 | No | 37 | Normal Term Infant |
| 4 | 10 | Atrial fibrillation* | No | 22 | No | 37 | Normal Term Infant |
| 5 | 1 | No | 2U RBC | 13 | No | 26 | Abortion due to fetal chromosomal abnormality |
Postoperative information of five patients undergoing MICS during pregnancy.
Four days after the surgery, the patient had an episode of acute atrial fibrillation with heart rate of 171 bpm. The sinus rhythm was returned with a heart rate of 92 bpm after the Valsava maneuver twice. One day after the first episode, the patients felt palpation with no reason and the ECG revealed a rapid onset of atrial fibrillation with a heart rate of 175 bpm. Antiarrhythmic drugs (12.5 mg beta-blocker and 0.2 mg deslanoside) were given and the episode was terminated. Beta-blocker was used to maintain the sinus rhythm.
In the published article, there was an error. A correction has been made to Perioperative management strategy, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“Sevoflurane, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium were used for anesthetic maintenance with certain level of Nacrotrend Bis values between 40 and 60.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Sevoflurane, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium were used for anesthetic maintenance with certain level of Nacrotrend values between 40 and 60.”
In the published article, there was an error.
A correction has been made to Perioperative management strategy, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“After heparinization, a 24 Fr venous cannula and 19 Fr arterial cannula were placed in the right femoral vein and artery.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“After heparinization, venous cannula and arterial cannula were placed in the right femoral vein and artery.”
In the published article, there was an error. A correction has been made to Perioperative management strategy, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“the thoracoscopy was inserted via the 5th intercostal space.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“the thoracoscopy was inserted via the 4th or 5th intercostal space.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), video-assisted, pregnancy, cardiopulmonary bypass, perioperative management
Citation
Lu A, Ye Y, Hu J, Wei N, Wei J, Lin B and Wang S (2022) Corrigendum: Case series: Video-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery during pregnancy. Front. Med. 9:1054415. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1054415
Received
26 September 2022
Accepted
11 October 2022
Published
28 October 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited and reviewed by
Ata Murat Kaynar, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Lu, Ye, Hu, Wei, Wei, Lin and Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sheng Wang shengwang_gz@163.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.