Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Med., 28 May 2021
Sec. Dermatology
This article is part of the Research Topic Pruritus Medicine View all 27 articles

Itch: A Global Problem?

  • Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Introduction: the Global Burden of Itch

Chronic itch (CI) is defined as itch occurring for 6 weeks and longer (1). Both the frequency and the causes of CI depend on age, predisposition like atopy, underlying diseases, ethnicity, climate/humidity, and especially access to the regional healthcare system (25). Different living conditions and rituals in human beings as well as migration also contribute to acute and chronic itch (5, 6). The prevalence of itch appears to differ worldwide (2, 3, 5). Direct comparisons between continents or countries are unusual and rare. There are only a few epidemiological studies on itch outside Europe and North America (2, 3, 5). This may be mainly caused by the facts that there is a lack of dermatological care in many countries, no direct access to a dermatologist in most countries, and several countries do not allow access to health care without any insurance certificate or cash payment. Comparing studies from different countries all over the world is difficult because of different and/or unclear, especially non-standardized definitions of itch, lacking to differentiate acute and chronic itch and especially of a lack of defining prevalence estimates. A very recent meta-analysis in atopic dermatitis (AD) and its clinical characteristics stated itch to be almost universally reported and the most common feature in AD (7). Chronic urticaria affects about 1% of the world population, presents with severe itch, and constitutes a global burden (8). Dermatological diseases (frequently accompanied by itch) have a worldwide distribution, but their prevalence is related to the geographical location. For example, otomycoses is much more frequent in subtropical and tropical climate (9) and does hardly contribute to the differential diagnoses of CI in countries with Western lifestyle. Scabies is considered to be the most frequent cause of acute itch but rather rare in CI. Scabies was recently added to the World Health Organization's list of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), and its occurrence has been increasing in poor countries, countries with low standard of living, and especially in times of wars, migration, and in reception centers for asylum seekers (10). As infections and infestations are more prevalent in subtropical and tropical countries, scabies is a major cause of acute itch in these countries but is considered to be a less frequent cause in Western countries that are more affected by CI. All this may explain why itch is mentioned as a global burden of skin diseases, also in the elderly (11, 12). A large-scale implementation of a mass drug administration campaign of scabies in Ethiopia was called “stop the itch” (13).

Itch, especially CI, strongly reduces health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (2, 3, 5, 1416). CI can be an additional burden in chronically ill patients leading to an additional reduction in QOL and affecting mortality in patients (1416). CI can be a symptom or precursor of another (frequently) severe disease (17), but diagnostics are limited and not accessible in most countries; for example, radiological diagnostics and allergy testing are not reimbursed in many countries or excluded in insurance policy (18, 19). Common treatments like antihistamines do not relive itch, even in combination (19, 20). All this makes the topic of itch so important.

Etiologies of Itch Worldwide: Examples

Itch is highly prevalent in European dermatological outpatient clinics. The prevalence of itch among adult dermatological patients was 54.4 and 8% among the controls (21). The intensity was highest among patients with prurigo. It is also prevalent in dermatological practices. In a German private practice, the prevalence of itch in a 1-week period was 36.2% (87.6% of whom had chronic itch) (22).

Itch may reflect a malignant disease. A Danish cohort study investigated the association between hospital inpatient and outpatient diagnosis of itch and cancer incidence (23). The 1-year absolute cancer risk was 1.63%. Among patients with itch, a 13% higher than expected number of cases with hematological and various solid cancers were found (23). However, the study was unable to differentiate between acute and chronic itch. In a Danish acute outpatient dermatological clinic, “pruritus and prurigo” were among the most prevalent diagnoses, accounting for 2.5% of all referred patients, but when considering all diagnoses, one may assume that itch was an accompanying symptom in more than 50% of referred cases (24).

Xerosis cutis, systemic diseases, and drug intake are frequent in elderly patients and may all contribute to the occurrence of CI (2, 3, 25). Dry skin, itchy dermatoses, and diabetes all contribute to chronic itch in the elderly.

Itch is also prevalent in the general population and is not always addressed by a medical doctor (MD). The Heidelberg Pruritus Prevalence Study showed a point prevalence of 13.5%, a 12-month prevalence of 16.4%, and a lifetime prevalence of 22% of CI in the general population (26). In the follow-up study, the 12-month cumulative incidence of chronic itch was 7%, and the lifetime prevalence was 25.5% (27). Women were more affected than men, and female sex was associated with an increased but non-significant risk for incident CI during the past 12-months (27).

Itch is prevalent in chronic diseases, especially in Western societies. CI in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a considerable problem, and regional differences need to be taken into account because in (developing) countries, patients have limited access to hemodialysis (HD) with differing dialysis quality standards. There are no epidemiological studies on itch HD in developing countries because this treatment is hardly available. A representative cross-sectional prospective prevalence study on chronic itch (CI) in HD patients [German Epidemiological Hemodialysis Itch Study (GEHIS)] showed CI to affect 25.2% (point prevalence) of HD patients (28). No significant differences in prevalence estimates were shown concerning ethnic origin, schooling, or patients' marital status (28).

HIV infection and AIDS contribute to acute and CI worldwide (2, 3, 5, 29). Some diseases vary according to country and its most frequent diseases. Pruritic papular eruption (PPE) is a substantial cause of HIV-related morbidity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Its prevalence varies from 12 to 46% depending on the geographical region. More than half of HIV-infected patients report the eruption of PPE as their initial disease manifestation. We could show that none of the Ugandan itch patients had an underlying systemic disease, and in all HIV patients, itching was caused by dermatoses (5). It is likely that Ugandan patients with severe systemic diseases do not have a survival period that allows the initiation of itch, such as uremic itch, or access to certain therapies such as hemodialysis. Various etiologies from skin disease and keloids to drugs and burns contribute to a high prevalence of itch in African countries (3034) (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Ritual behavior like cutting the skin in many African and Asian countries contribute to chronic itch caused by keloid manifestation in variable shape and extent.

Discussion and Future Thoughts

Itch is a big challenge for clinicians and researchers all over the world, especially in regard to the structure of the regional healthcare system and the accessibility to medical care and specialists particularly in Non-Western countries. True epidemiological studies are lacking, especially in Asian and African countries as well as in South America. There is a lack of awareness, depending on, for example, the MD's speciality; other symptoms may be rated higher and/or itch is ignored. This is also caused by a lack of knowledge on itch. However, the rise in clinical and experimental research and findings resulting in an increased number of publications and networks like International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI) (1, 35, 36), the EDAV Task Force Pruritus (37, 38), and scientific meetings like The World Congress of Itch (WCI) have helped to increase itch being regarded as a global problem. Social networking platforms like, e.g., Instagram, connect patients looking for the support regarding itch (39). All this has increased the awareness of itch beyond dermatology. It has also improved the capacity to diagnose itch. More and specific clinical studies have enhanced the spectrum of treatments; local and systemic treatments were developed, which are also reflected in an updated S2k guideline on chronic pruritus (19). However, there is still a need for new and more specific treatments of itch including combination of treatments. The demographic situation in Western countries with an increasing number of aged patients, most of them chronically ill, will additionally increase the need for dermatological care including the treatment of itch. This also includes improving patients' motivation and the assistance to seek the specialist's help. Even if there is access, chronically ill patients tend to limit their visits to MDs especially when they already have chronic procedures/treatments like HD. This results in limited itch treatment, even in a Western country (40). In recent years, utilizing technology like telehealth services and teledermatology are useful to provide diagnoses like prurigo by consulting physicians (41). A global look makes one realize that all this is not accessible for most of the countries out of Europe and North America. The inequalities in health are also present in itch and its handling. There is a gross mismatch between the burden of itch and the skills and medications to treat them. To change this is basically not only a medical challenge but an economic and political one of all societies including the global economy. In the end, it is the task of any society to decide how to disseminate medical care and how to provide resources.

Some Open Questions

How does the perception and the impact of itch differ according to continent and climate?

Will the climate change affect the frequency and etiologies of itch?

Does the awareness of itch and its health care depend on life expectancy and standard of living?

How can we improve education of MDs and healthcare providers to enhance the awareness for especially chronic itch?

Could we initiate a global network to better provide the care of chronic itch?

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Ständer S, Weisshaar E, Mettang T, Szepietowski JC, Carstens E, Ikoma A, et al. Clinical classification of itch: a position paper of the International Forum for the Study of Itch. Acta Derm Venereol. (2007) 87:291–4. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Weisshaar E, Dalgard F. Epidemiology of Itch: adding to the Burden of Skin Morbidity. Acta Derm Venereol. (2009) 89:339–50. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Weisshaar E. Epidemiology of itch. Curr Probl Dermatol. (2016) 50:5–10. doi: 10.1159/000446010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dalgard F, Holm JØ, Svensson A, Kumar B, Sundby J. Self-reported skin morbidity and ethnicity: a population-based study in a Western community. BMC Dermatol. (2007) 7:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-7-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Weisshaar E, Apfelbacher C, Jager G, Zimmermann E, Bruckner T, Diepgen TL, et al. Pruritus as a leading symptom: clinical characteristics and quality of life in German and Ugandan patients. Br J Dermatol. (2006) 155:957–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07430.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Padovese V, Knapp A. Challenges of managing skin diseases in refugees and migrants. Dermatol Clin. (2021) 39:101–15. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2020.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yew YW, Thyssen JP, Silverberg JI. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the regional and age-related differences in atopic dermatitis clinical characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2019) 80:390–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gonçalo M, Gimenéz-Arnau A, Al-Ahmad M, Ben-Shoshan M, Bernstein JA, Ensina LF, et al. The global burden of chronic urticaria for the patient and society. Br J Dermatol. (2021) 184:226–36. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gharaghani M, Seifi Z, Zarei Mahmoudabadi A. Otomycosis in Iran: a review. Mycopathologia. (2015) 179:415–24. doi: 10.1007/s11046-015-9864-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Stamm LV, Strowd LC. Ignoring the “Itch”: the global health problem of scabies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2017) 97:1647–9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, Bolliger IW, Dellavalle RP, Margolis DJ, et al. The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions. J Invest Dermatol. (2014) 134:1527–34. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hay RJ, Fuller LC. Global burden of skin disease in the elderly: a grand challenge to skin health. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. (2015) 150:693–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Enbiale W, Baynie TB, Ayalew A, Gebrehiwot T, Getanew T, Ayal A, et al. “Stopping the itch”: mass drug administration for scabies outbreak control covered for over nine million people in Ethiopia. J Infect Dev Ctries. (2020) 14:28–35S. doi: 10.3855/jidc.11701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Weiss M, Mettang T, Tschulena U, Weisshaar E. Health-related quality of life in haemodialysis patients suffering from chronic itch: results from GEHIS (German Epidemiology Haemodialysis Itch Study). Qual Life Res. (2016) 25:3097–106. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1340-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Grochulska K, Ofenloch RF, Mettang T, Weisshaar E. Mortality of haemodialysis patients with and without chronic itch: a follow-up study of the German Epidemiological Hemodialysis Itch Study (GEHIS). Acta Derm Venereol. (2019) 99:423–8. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Plewig N, Ofenloch R, Mettang T, Weisshaar E. The course of chronic itch in hemodialysis patients: results of a 4-year follow-up study of GEHIS (German Epidemiological Hemodialysis Itch Study). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2019) 33:1429–35. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Beigi M, Häberle M, Gschwendtner A, Baum U, Weisshaar E. Generalized chronic itch as a first sign of malignancy resembling paraneoplastic sensomotoric neuropathy. Acta Derm Venereol. (2018) 98:526–27. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Weisshaar E, Molin S, Darsow U, Geier J. Contact sensitization in prurigo patients. Contact Dermatitis. (2016) 75:173–9. doi: 10.1111/cod.12564

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Weisshaar E, Szepietowski JC, Dalgard F, Garcovich S, Gieler U, Gimenez-Arnau A, et al. S2k European guideline on chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. (2019) 99:469–506. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Matterne U, Böhmer MM, Weisshaar E, Jupiter A, Carter B, Apfelbacher CJ. Oral H1 antihistamines as 'add-on' therapy to topical treatment for eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 1:CD012167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012167.pub2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Halvorsen JA, Kupfer J, Dalgard F. The prevalence and intensity of itch among dermatological patients in 13 European countries. Acta Derm Venereol. (2013) 91:620.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Kopyciok ME, Ständer HF, Osada N, Steinke S, Ständer S. Prevalence and characteristics of pruritus: a one-week cross-sectional study in a German dermatology practice. Acta Derm Venereol. (2016) 96:50–5. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Johannesdottir SA, Farkas DK, Vinding GR, Pedersen L, Lamberg A, Lamberg A, et al. Cancer incidence among patients with a hospital diagnosis of pruritus: a nationwide Danish cohort study. Br J Dermatol. (2014) 171:839–46. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Fett N, Haynes K, Propert KJ, Margolis DJ. Five-year malignancy incidence in patients with chronic pruritus: a population-based cohort study aimed at limiting unnecessary screening practices. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2014) 70:651–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.11.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Valdes-Rodriguez R, Mollanazar NK, González-Muro J, Nattkemper L, Torres-Alvarez B, López-Esqueda FJ, et al. Itch prevalence and characteristics in a Hispanic geriatric population: a comprehensive study using a standardized itch questionnaire. Acta Derm Venereol. (2015) 95:417–21. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1968

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Matterne U, Apfelbacher CJ, Loerbroks A, Schwarzer T, Büttner M, Ofenloch R, et al. Prevalence, correlates and characteristics of chronic pruritus: a population-based cross-sectional study. Acta Derm Venereol. (2011) 91:674–9. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Matterne U, Apfelbacher CJ, Vogelgsang L, Loerbroks A, Weisshaar E. Incidence and determinants of chronic pruritus: a population-based cohort study. Acta Derm Venereol. (2013) 93:532–7. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Weiss M, Mettang T, Tschulena U, Passlick-Deetjen J, Weisshaar E. Prevalence of chronic itch and associated factors in hemodialysis patients: a representative cross-sectional study. Acta Derm Venereol. (2015) 98:816–21. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2087

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Xu T, Shetty AK, Badiger S, Chan YH, Yosipovitch G. Prevalence and characteristics of pruritus and association with quality of life in people living with HIV: a cross-sectional study. J Pain Symp Manag. (2018) 55:e4–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Mirembe SK, Mulyowa GK, Jaeger G, Ofenloch R, Diepgen TL, Weisshaar E. Hand eczema in Africa: clinical findings and experiences from South-West Uganda. Acta Derm Venereol. (2016) 96:388–9. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Mahboob F. Frequency and aetiology of pruritis in admitted patients in a medical ward of Mayo Hospital, Lahore. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. (2004) 16:42–3.

Google Scholar

32. Nyembue TD, Jorissen M, Hellings PW, Muyunga C, Kayembe JM. Prevalence and determinants of allergic diseases in a Congolese population. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. (2012) 2:285–93. doi: 10.1002/alr.21017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Obebi Cliff-Eribo K, Sammons H, Star K, Ralph Edwards I, Osakwe A, Choonara I. Adverse drug reactions in Nigerian children: a retrospective review of reports submitted to the Nigerian Pharmacovigilance Centre from 2005 to 2012. Paediatr Int Child Health. (2016) 36:300–4. doi: 10.1179/2046905515Y.0000000059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Otene CI, Onumaegbu OO. Post-burn pruritus: need for standardization of care in Nigeria. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. (2013) 26:63–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Ständer S, Augustin M, Reich A, Blome C, Ebata T, Phan NQ, et al. Pruritus assessment in clinical trials: consensus recommendations from the International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI) Special Interest Group Scoring Itch in Clinical Trials. Acta Derm Venereol. (2013) 93:509–14. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Weisshaar E Weiss M Mettang T Yosipovitch G Zylicz Z Special Interest Group of the International Forum on the Study of Itch. Paraneoplastic itch: an expert position statement from the Special Interest Group (SIG) of the International Forum on the Study of Itch (IFSI). Acta Derm Venereol. (2015) 95:261–5. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1959

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ständer S, Zeidler C, Riepe C, Steinke S, Fritz F, Bruland P, et al. European EADV network on assessment of severity and burden of Pruritus (PruNet): first meeting on outcome tools. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2016) 30:1144–7. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Pereira MP, Steinke S, Zeidler C, Forner C, Riepe C, Augustin M, et al. European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology European Prurigo Project: expert consensus on the definition, classification and terminology of chronic prurigo. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2018) 32:1059–65. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Braunberger T, Mounessa J, Rudningen K, Dunnick CA, Dellavalle RP. Global skin diseases on Instagram hashtags. Dermatol Online J. (2017) 23:13030/qt7sk410j3.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Hayani K, Weiss M, Weisshaar E. Clinical findings and provision of care in haemodialysis patients with chronic itch: new results from the German Epidemiological Haemodialysis Itch Study. Acta Derm Venereol. (2016) 96:361–6. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lotfizadeh A, Sultonov RA, Morim A, Tavakol S, Daneshvar M, Qosimov A, et al. Utilizing technology for dermatology care in Tajikistan. A health systems perspective. Dermatol Clin. (2021) 39:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2020.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: itch, global itch, pruritus, prevalence, prurigo, epidemiology

Citation: Weisshaar E (2021) Itch: A Global Problem? Front. Med. 8:665575. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.665575

Received: 08 February 2021; Accepted: 21 April 2021;
Published: 28 May 2021.

Edited by:

Yan-Gang Sun, Institute of Neuroscience, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Reviewed by:

Tasuku Akiyama, University of Miami, United States

Copyright © 2021 Weisshaar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Elke Weisshaar, elke.weisshaar@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.