Xinyi Zhang1,2,3†
Li Wang1,2,3†
Wenhui Fu1,2,3
Yue Feng1,2,3
Chengrun Zeng1,2,3
Liu Zhou1,2,3,4
Tao Zhang5
Tingting Xu1,2,3
Jianpeng Cao1,2,3
Zibo Li5*
Yue Chen1,2,3*- 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- 2Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan, Luzhou, China
- 3Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan, Luzhou, China
- 4School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- 5Department of Radiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
18F-Labeled blood pool agents (BPAs) have attracted great attention for identifying bleeding sites. However, many BPAs are not sufficiently evaluated partially due to the limitations of labeling methods. In our previous work, we noticed that 18F-PEG1-vinyl sulfone (18F-VS) could efficiently label red blood cells (RBCs) ex vivo and in situ. However, its application as BPA is not fully evaluated. In this study, we systematically explored the feasibility of using 18F-VS-labeled RBCs as a positron emission tomography (PET) BPA for intra-abdominal bleeding diagnosis. In brief, we first optimized the labeling conditions, which lead to an 80% labeling yield of RBCs after incubating with 18F-VS in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37°C for 20 min. 18F-VS-labeled RBCs were found to be stable in vitro, which could simplify its transportation/storage for in vivo applications. In normal rat PET study, the cardiovascular system could be clearly imaged up to 5 h post injection (p.i.). An intra-abdominal hemorrhage rat model demonstrated that the 18F-VS-labeled RBCs clearly showed the dynamic changes of extravascular radioactivity due to intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Validation in the model of gastrointestinal bleeding clearly demonstrated the great potential of using 18F-VS-labeled RBCs as a BPA, which could be further evaluated in future studies.
Introduction
Blood pool imaging (BPI) is widely used in preclinical and clinical research including the detection of gastrointestinal bleeding (1), blood volume measurement (2), evaluation of cardiac function (3, 4), localization of hemangiomas (5), cerebral blood flow (6, 7), detection of infection (8), or lymphoma (9). Various kinds of BPI agents have been developed, including 18F-FDG-, 111In-oxine (8), or 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leukocytes (10); 68Ga-NOTA-NEB-(9) and 111In-oxine-labeled platelets (11); 99mTc-PYP-labeled red blood cells (RBCs) (12); radionuclide-labeled peptides (13); and magnetic resonance angiography-based BPI agents (14). RBCs represent promising BPI agents due to their good stability and easy availability. In fact, radionuclide-labeled RBCs have been used to obtain functional information of the cardiovascular system through quantitative analysis of BPI. During the past few decades, radionuclide-labeled RBCs [such as 51Cr-RBCs (15), 99mTc-PYP-RBCs (16), and 68Ga-oxine-RBCs (17)] have shown great progress in preclinical and clinical research applications. They have been used for cardiac function evaluation, diagnosis of hemangioma and digestive tract bleeding, cerebral blood flow measurement, and spleen imaging and positioning. Despite the progress, limitations of these BPI-agents include 1) unstable labeling yield: for example, the labeling rate of 99mTc-PYP-RBCs was greatly affected by the type and dose of the drug applied (18) and 2) the resolution of single-photon emission nuclide 99mTc often resulted in reduced image quality compared with the positron emission tomography (PET) nuclide (19). Therefore, researchers have been trying to develop BPI agents based on PET nuclides. 11C, 13N, and 68Ga have been used to label RBCs, but their short half-lives or image resolution still limited their widespread clinical application to a certain extent (20, 21).
The positron nuclide 18F has the advantages of good image quality and suitable half-life (109.8 min) for commercialization and transportation compared with other positron nuclides. Moreover, the resulting carbon–fluorine bonds generally have reasonable stability, which could be advantageous for BPI (22). However, there are only a few 18F-labeled RBCs reported as BPI agents partially due to the limitation of the labeling method (23). Therefore, there is a need to find new methods that could lead to easily prepared 18F-labeled BPI agents for preclinical and clinical diagnosis applications.
Previously, we established a new method for site-specific labeling of thiol groups based on 18F-labeled vinyl sulfone (18F-VS). Both peptides and proteins were found to react with 18F-VS through the Michael addition in an aqueous system (24). Moreover, the resulting conjugates are stable in the aqueous solution and would not be hydrolyzed in a neutral solution like maleimide conjugates (25). Recently, it was also found that 18F-VS could react with amino groups in addition to thiol groups even though the reaction is slower (26). Interestingly, we observed that 18F-VS could efficiently label RBCs in vitro and in vivo. Despite the observation, the conditions to label RBCs were not optimized, and its application as BPI was not studied.
In this study, we evaluate the use of 18F-((2-(2-fluoroethoxy)ethyl)sulfonyl)ethene (18F-PEG1-vinyl sulfone [18F-VS]) for RBC labeling, which are then applied as a new BPI agent for abdominal hemorrhage imaging in animal models.
Materials and Methods
All chemicals involved in the synthesis were of reagent grade and purchased from Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology (Shanghai, China) or Sigma. The radiochemical purity was documented by high-performance liquid chromatography (LC-16). A gamma counter (CAPRAC-t, Huaruisen Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and a dose calibrator (CRC-15R, Capintec Inc., Florham Park, NJ) were used to measure the radioactivity of the samples. Mouse and rat data acquisitions were performed with a micro-PET/computed tomography (CT) scanner (Inveon, Siemens, Munich, Germany). Healthy Kunming mice (20 g ± 2 g) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (120 g ± 12 g) were provided by the Animal Experimental Center of Southwestern Medical University (Animal License SCXK 2018-17), and all studies were approved by the Ethics Committee of Southwest Medical University. The precursor 2-(2-(vinyl sulfonyl)ethoxy)ethyl 4-nitrobenzene sulfonate was synthesized and characterized using the method described in the literature (24).
Synthesis of Intermediate Synthon [18F]-((2-(2-Fluoroethoxy)Ethyl)Sulfonyl)Ethene
The [18F]F− produced from cyclotron was trapped on a QMA cartridge and then eluted by a tetrabutyl ammonium bicarbonate (TBAB) solution in water and acetonitrile. The resulting tetrabutylammonium fluoride ([18F]TBAF) solution was thoroughly dried by heating with anhydrous acetonitrile with N2 blow three times and then redissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile. [18F]TBAF (150 mCi in acetonitrile) was added to the solution of 2-(2-(vinyl sulfonyl)ethoxy)ethyl 4-nitrobenzene sulfonate (5 mg) in anhydride acetonitrile (80 μl) in a cap-sealed v-vial. The reaction mixture was heated at 85°C for 15 min. After cooling down, 1.0 ml of water was added, and the reaction mixture was loaded on HPLC for purification (column: type, AQ 5 μm; size, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, col. no. A6AD 10292; solvent A: 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid water; solvent B: 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid acetonitrile; 0–2 min: isocratic elution of 15% solvent B; 2–22 min, 15–95% of solvent B; flow rate: 3 ml/min). The desired product 18F-VS has a retention time of 11 min, and the average radiochemical yield is 31%. The acetonitrile in the product was removed under vacuum, and the final product was reformulated with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.3). The radiochemical purity analysis of 18F-VS was performed using HPLC (Supplementary Figure 2).
RBCs Preparation
The rats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and 4 ml of blood was collected from the heart using an injection needle. Heparin (1,000 IU/kg body weight) was used to prevent blood clotting. After centrifugation (400 g for 10 min at 20°C), RBCs were located at the bottom of the tube. The plasma was separated from RBCs and stored for subsequent post-labeling stability studies. The buffy coating, which contains most of white blood cells and platelets, was removed, leaving the RBC layer undisturbed.
Optimization of Labeling Conditions
The separated RBCs and 18F-VS solution (74 MBq, 600 μl) were mixed thoroughly and then divided into eight tubes and incubated separately at 0°C and 37°C (n = 4 in a group). The incubation time varied from 0 to 60 min, with 10-min intervals. At the corresponding incubation timepoint, 20 μl of the corresponding suspension was removed and mixed with an additional 100 μl PBS solution. Then, the mixture was subjected to centrifugation. Radioactivity of the supernatant and that of the erythrocyte sediment were measured separately. Optimal conditions for labeling RBCs with 18F-VS were determined and used thereafter for further evaluation.
Post-Labeling Stability of 18F-VS-RBCs
Post-labeling stability was evaluated by calculating the radioactivity released from 18F-VS-RBCs. The optimized labeling condition was detailed below: the centrifugal-washed RBC suspension (3 ml) and 18F-VS solution (74 MBq in 600 μl) were mixed thoroughly and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Then 18F-VS-RBCs were washed three times with PBS (8 ml), and 18F-VS-RBCs was isolated. To the purified 18F-VS-RBCs, plasma solution was added and mixed. 18F-VS-RBC suspension was divided into two tubes and incubated for 0 to 180 min (30-min intervals) at 0° and 37°C, respectively. After the corresponding incubation time, 18F-VS-RBC suspension was cooled and uniformly resuspended. Then, the radioactivity of 18F-VS-RBC suspension (10 μl) was measured (n = 4). The remaining 18F-VS-RBC suspension was centrifuged at 450 g for 2 min, and the supernatant (10 μl) was sampled (n = 4). Radioactivity counts of the RBC suspension and supernatant were simultaneously measured. The release fraction was calculated according to the following formula: release fraction (%) = (radioactivity of the supernatant/radioactivity of initial RBC pellet) × 100%. The supernatant at 30 and 120 min timepoints were also analyzed by radio-HPLC. For the sample at the 120 min timepoint, elution from HPLC was collected per minute and counted by a gamma counter due to the low radioactivity.
Incubation of 19F-VS With RBCs
19F-VS was prepared with the previously reported method (26), which was then added to 5 μl RBCs in 2 ml saline to form a final concentration of 19F-VS at 10 and 100 μM. No 19F-VS was added in the blank control. All RBCs in the Petri dishes were incubated at 4°C, and the shape of RBCs was observed at the 2, 6, 12, and 24 h timepoints.
PET Imaging of Normal Rats
Normal SD rats (120 ± 12 g) were used in this study. All rats were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane, which was maintained throughout the imaging procedure. The imaging study was performed using a small-animal PET system. SD rats were placed on a fixed plate in the supine position for scanning. 18F-VS-RBCs (24.8 ± 2.6 MBq and 400 μl) was injected through the tail vein. At the same time, images were continuously acquired for 60 min using the list mode. The list mode data were reconstructed using a dynamic sequence (30 frames, 60 s). After reconstruction, regions of interest (ROIs, mm3) of the heart, blood vessels, and spleen were obtained using the software provided by the supplier (Inveon Research Workplace 4.2, Siemens). The values were presented as dose per gram of organ (% ID/g).
Imaging Study of the Rat Intra-Abdominal Hemorrhage Model
A glycerin enema was injected into the colon through the anus of rats to promote defecation about 30 min before the image acquisition. Then, 22.5 MBq of tracer (18F-VS-RBCs with 1,000 IU/kg body weight heparin for anticoagulation) was injected through the tail vein and the PET/CT dynamic acquisition was started simultaneously. List mode data were acquired for 60 min. Under steady-state BPI conditions (10–15 min after injection), a 12-gauge lumbar puncture needle was used to manually puncture the colon wall through the anus to cause abdominal bleeding.
Image Analysis
For the abdominal hemorrhage model, the data acquisition and reconstruction were performed using the procedures described above. The ROI was drawn in the corresponding bleeding area. Radioactivity was presented using %ID/g, which was then then used to obtain the corresponding time–activity curve. The post-bleeding image (58–60 min after injection) and pre-bleeding image (10–20 min after injection) were subtracted with the PMOD software (Zurich, Switzerland) to measure the radioactivity of the bleeding site in the abdominal hemorrhage model. Negative values of the pixels in the subtracted image were replaced with zero values. Then, the total radioactivity of the abdominal hemorrhage image was presented as the percentage of the injected dose after excluding bladder radioactivity.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics 20.0 software package (IBM, Chicago, IL). The significance level was set to 0.05.
Results and Discussion
18F-VS Preparation
Similar to previous reports, the 18F-VS was obtained through a nucleophile substitution of VS-ONs with [18F]TBAF. The reaction mixture was purified using HPLC (Supplementary Figure 1), and the resulting 18F-VS was obtained in 25–40% yield with ≥99% radiochemical purity and a retention time of 12.2 min (Supplementary Figure 2).
Evaluation Labeling Efficiency of 18F-VS-RBCs
As a new BPI agent, it is important to optimize the labeling conditions to maximize the yield of 18F-VS-RBCs. It is also important to understand the release profile from RBCs under different conditions (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The LE and its influencing factors. Relationship between labeling temperature, incubation time, and the LE of 18F-VS-RBCs (n = 4).
The labeling efficiency (LE) of 18F-VS on RBCs was higher with an incubation temperature of 37°C compared with 0°C. Prolonging the incubation time would increase the LE steadily, which would then reach a plateau. At 37°C, the LE is 76.93% (±1.66%), 80.10% (±1.08%), and 79.11% (±1.63%) at 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively. At 0°C, the yield is 58.17% (±2.18%), 63.12% (±5.67%), and 64.23% (±1.70%) at 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively. Further increasing the incubation time led to a decreased non-decay-corrected yield. Considering the increased radioactivity decay over time, we concluded that the optimal labeling condition for 18F-VS-RBCs is 20 min incubation at 37°C.
Evaluation in vitro Stability of 18F-VS-RBCs
To evaluate the in vitro stability of 18F-VS-RBCs, a post-labeling stability experiment involving different storage temperatures was performed (Figure 2). In this study, the released 18F-containing fraction from 18F-VS-RBCs was evaluated for 180 min. Samples were incubated at 37° and 0°C, respectively, to simulate the temperature of the human body and the potential transportation/storage conditions using ice packs. 18F-VS-RBC suspension (10 μl) was then taken for analysis at different incubation timepoints.
Figure 2. Post-labeling stability analysis. The released radioactive fraction of 18F-VS-RBCs when incubated in plasma at 37° or 0°C for 0–180 min (n = 4).
The release of 18F was relatively small but noticeable. Incubation at 37°C for 0, 60, 120, and 180 min resulted in release fractions of 0.94% (±0.09%), 1.71% (±0.18%), 2.62% (±0.36%), and 2.65% (±0.48%), respectively. The corresponding samples incubated at 0°C had release fractions of 0.86% (±0.15%), 1.27% (±0.26%), 1.35% (±0.16%), and 1.44% (±0.29%), respectively. 18F-VS-RBCs showed better stability when stored at 0°C compared with 37°C. This indicated that 18F-VS-RBCs should be stored at 0°C between preparation and injection. The agent could be rewarmed before injection for in vivo research.
Overall, the released fractions of 18F-VS-RBCs in the in vitro study were rather low. Thus, we concluded that 18F-VS-RBCs were relatively stable in vitro. Moreover, HPLC analysis of the supernatant indicated that the released fraction only had a small amount of 18F-VS in addition to some unknown radioactive fractions (Supplementary Figure 3). This observation indicated that 18F-VS likely reacted with RBC through a covalent bond instead of passive absorption. As the released radioactive fraction may be excreted in the urine or absorbed by extravascular tissue after injection, imaging should be performed at an early timepoint if possible.
Evaluate the Toxicity of 19F-VS on RBCs
To evaluate the toxicity of the tracer, the 19F-VS was prepared and incubated with RBCs at 4°C in saline. The shape of RBCs was observed, and images of RBCs were recorded at each timepoint (Supplementary Figure 5). As shown in Supplementary Figure 5, the shape of RBCs stayed complete, and there was no obvious broken RBCs observed, indicating that 18F-VS has no apparent toxicity on RBCs.
Evaluation of 18F-VS-RBCs for PET Imaging
Under optimal conditions, the average time from drawing blood to intravenously injecting 18F-VS-RBCs was ~60 min. Microscopic examination showed that the morphology of 18F-VS-labeled RBCs was normal without abnormal aggregation. The final 18F-VS-RBC suspension (400 μl) had a radioactivity of 25.9 MBq (±3.7 MBq) and an LE of 70.09% (±0.61%) (n = 4).
PET Imaging of Normal Rats
In order to evaluate the distribution of 18F-VS-RBCs in the cardiovascular system and the changes of radioactivity in the blood pool, we performed 18F-VS-RBC imaging in normal rats. The maximum-intensity projection image and biodistribution of 18F-VS-RBCs within 60 min after injection are shown in Figure 3 and Table 1, respectively. The cardiovascular system in normal rats had a strong uptake of 18F-VS-RBCs. A high uptake was obtained within 20 min, which was maintained stably at late time-points. Compared with that at 10 min, cardiac radioactivity at 60 min only decreased by ~0.7%. The radioactivity of most organs remained relatively constant within 60 min. The results indicated that 18F-VS-RBCs had a good stability in vivo. Within 60 min after tracer injection, atrium and spleen radioactivity was higher than that in the liver and lung. Urine excretion was observed. The PET imaging of the cardiovascular system in rats was clearly visualized with a low background ratio using 18F-VS-RBCs. As shown in Figure 3, 18F-VS-RBCs mainly stayed in the blood pool, suggesting good stability in vivo. At a late timepoint, urine activity was observed. As shown in Supplementary Figure 3, a small percentage of activity was released to the supernatant, which contains a hydrophilic motif. This may lead to the observed urine activity. Nonetheless, additional characterization would be done in a future study to further confirm it. Overall, 18F-VS-RBCs hold a great potential to imaging the cardiovascular system considering its slow clearance and stability profile.
Figure 3. Dynamic scan of normal rats using micro-PET/CT after injection with 18F-VS-RBCs.
Table 1. Biodistribution of 18F-VS-RBCs at 60 min after injection in normal rats (n = 5/group).
Imaging Study of the Intra-Abdominal Hemorrhage Model on Rats
A dynamic PET scan was performed on rats to evaluate the feasibility of using this BPI agent for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Dynamic PET imaging of the rat gastrointestinal bleeding model showed that shortly after the colon wall puncture, a high aggregation site appeared in the abdomen, indicating the tracer had extravasated due to bleeding (Figures 4A–C). Time–activity curves showed that the agent increased steadily at the bleeding site: radioactivity was stable within 10 min and continued to increase thereafter (Figure 4D). 18F-VS-labeled RBCs successfully found the location and direction of abdominal bleeding over time. Although this study did not quantify the amount of bleeding, it can provide a rough estimation based on the blood radioactivity curve. Clearly, PET imaging of the rat intra-abdominal hemorrhage model demonstrated that 18F-VS-RBCs hold a great potential for applications in gastrointestinal bleeding. Furthermore, without dietary restrictions, the labeling procedure of 18F-VS-RBCs is simpler and shorter than the reported 18F-FDG-RBCs. We would also like to point out that the potential limitations of 18F-VS-RBCs include the requirement of clean space due to blood collection and in vitro labeling procedures. The radiation exposure toward operators could be high. Further improvements may focus on simplifying the labeling step by reducing the number of washing and streamlining the production process. Nonetheless, 18F-VS-RBC PET of normal animal and intra-abdominal hemorrhage model suggested that the agent could represent a new BPI agent.
Figure 4. The application of 18F-VS-RBCs for PET imaging of the intra-abdominal hemorrhage model. The maximum-density projection image before (A) and after (B) bleeding and the subtraction image between the two (C). The subtracted image showed heavy bleeding in the right abdomen (arrowheads). The time–activity curve of extravascular radioactivity in the abdominal hemorrhage area. Radioactivity continued to increase after manual puncture of the colon wall (18 min) (D).
Conclusion
In this study, 18F-VS was synthesized and successfully labeled RBCs for BPI. The resulting 18F-VS-RBCs clearly visualized the cardiovascular system and extravascular blood in the abdominal hemorrhage model. Compared with existing cardiac blood pool agents, 18F-VS-RBCs could be prepared using a readily available precursor and simple procedure. The agent has prolonged retention time in cardiac blood pool with a high-quality image. The agent's uptake was not affected by blood sugar, which eliminated the need of fasting. Because 18F-VS-RBCs cannot penetrate the blood–brain barrier, it would be interesting to test its application in detecting bleeding in the brain in future studies.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University.
Author Contributions
XZ and LW contributed to the study design, the labeling process, the imaging scan, the data analysis and they contributed equally to this paper. XZ wrote the manuscript and LW revised the manuscript. WF, YF, CZ, TX, and JC were responsible for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. TZ and LZ contributed to precursor synthesis, the labeling and evaluation of the tracer stability during the revision of the work. The YC and ZL was responsible for revising for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the Nuclear Medicine Innovation Transformation Platform (2019JDPT0004) and the Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province (2018JY0230).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the members of the Molecular Imaging Laboratory of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University for their technical guidance, cooperation, and assistance with completing this research project. We would like to thank Mr. Lan Liu and Mr. Qiang Wan (Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University) for assistance with the cyclotron operation.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.646862/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Werner DJ, Manner H, Nguyen-Tat M, Kloeckner R, Kiesslich R, Abusalim N, et al. Endoscopic and angiographic management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: review of the published literature. United Eur Gastroenterol J. (2018) 6:337–42. doi: 10.1177/2050640617746299
2. Cheng HC, Khan MA, Bogdanov A Jr, Kwong K, Weissleder R. Relative blood volume measurements by magnetic resonance imaging facilitate detection of testicular torsion. Invest Radiol. (1997) 32:763–9. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199712000-00007
3. Massie BM, Kramer BL, Gertz EW, Henderson SG. Radionuclide measurement of left ventricular volume: comparison of geometric and counts-based methods, Circulation. (1982) 65:725–30. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.65.4.725
4. Friedman BJ, Drinkovic N, Miles H, Shih WJ, Mazzoleni A, DeMaria AN. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and gated blood pool scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1986) 8:1348–54. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80307-2
5. Ishikawa K, Saitoh M, Chida S. Detection of bladder hemangioma in a child by blood-pool scintigraphy. Pediatr Radiol. (2003) 33:433–5. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-0895-8
6. de Eulate RG, Goñi I, Galiano A, Vidorreta M, Recio M, Riverol M, et al. Reduced cerebral blood flow in mild cognitive impairment assessed using phase-contrast MRI. J Alzheimers Dis. (2017) 58:585–95. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161222
7. Snelling LK, Helfaer MA, Traystman RJ, Rogers MC. Comparison of cerebral blood flow by radionuclide cerebral angiography and by microspheres in cats. Crit Care Med. (1992) 20:395–401. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199203000-00017
8. Rini JN, Bhargava KK, Tronco GG, Singer C, Caprioli R, Marwin SE, et al. PET with FDG-labeled leukocytes versus scintigraphy with 111In-oxine-labeled leukocytes for detection of infection. Radiology. (2006) 238:978–87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2382041993
9. Hou G, Li X, Hou B, Zhou W, Cheng W. Lymphangioma on 68Ga-NOTA-Evans Blue PET/MRI. Clin Nucl Med. (2018) 43:553–5. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002129
10. Gutfilen B, Pellini MP, de Roure e Neder J, de Amarante Júnior JL, Evangelista MG, Fernandes SR, et al. 99mTc labeling white blood cells with a simple technique: clinical application, Ann Nucl Med. (1994) 8:85–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03164991
11. Schmidt KG, Rasmussen JW, Grove O, Madsen PE, Bargum R, Andersen D. Scintigraphic localization of intermittent gastrointestinal haemorrhage with indium-111-labelled platelets. Scand J Gastroenterol. (1983) 18:443–8. doi: 10.3109/00365528309181621
12. Winzelberg GG, McKusick KA, Froelich JW, Callahan RJ, Strauss HW. Detection of gastrointestinal bleeding with 99mTc-labeled red blood cells. Semin Nucl Med. (1982) 12:139–46. doi: 10.1016/S0001-2998(82)80005-6
13. Liu N, Wan Q, Cheng Z, Chen Y. Radionuclide-labeled peptides for imaging and treatment of CXCR4- overexpressing malignant tumors. Curr Top Med Chem. (2019) 19:17–32. doi: 10.2174/1568026619666190201094952
14. Pressacco J, Papas K, Lambert J, Paul Finn J, Chauny JM, Desjardins A, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography imaging of pulmonary embolism using agents with blood pool properties as an alternative to computed tomography to avoid radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. (2019) 113:165–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.007
15. Ito H, Yamamoto S, Saito K, Ikeda K, Hisada K. Quantitative estimation of hemorrhage in chronic subdural hematoma using the 51Cr erythrocyte labeling method. J Neurosurg. (1987) 66:862–4. doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.66.6.0862
16. Winzelberg GG, Froelich JW, McKusick KA, Waltman AC, Greenfield AJ, Athanasoulis CA, et al. Radionuclide localization of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Radiology. (1981) 139:465–9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.139.2.6971455
17. Drescher R, Gröber S, Seifert P, Freesmeyer M. Differentiation of residual splenic tissue from neuroendocrine tumor metastasis on PET/CT with heat-damaged, Ga-68-oxine-labeled red blood cells. Jpn J Clin Oncol. (2021) 51:160–1. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa066
18. Hladik WB III, Nigg KK, Rhodes BA. Drug-induced changes in the biologic distribution of radiopharmaceuticals. Semin Nucl Med. (1982) 12:184–218. doi: 10.1016/S0001-2998(82)80009-3
19. Hamilton RG, Alderson PO. A comparative evaluation of techniques for rapid and efficient in vivo labeling of red cells with [99mTc] pertechnetate. J Nucl Med. (1977) 18:1010–3.
20. Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Coleman RE, Welch MJ, Raichle ME, Weiss ES, et al. Tomographic images of blood pool and perfusion in brain and heart. J Nucl Med. (1976) 17:603–12.
21. Hoop B, Hnatowich DJ, Brownell GL, Jones T, McKusick KA, Ojemann RG, et al. Techniques for positron scintigraphy of the brain. J Nucl Med. (1976) 17:473–9.
22. Socan A, Petrik M, Kolenc Peitl P, Krošelj M, Rangger C, Novy Z, et al. On-cartridge preparation and evaluation of 68Ga-, 89Zr- and 64Cu-precursors for cell radiolabelling. Nucl Med Biol. (2019) 71:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2019.04.001
23. Matsusaka Y, Nakahara T, Takahashi K, Iwabuchi Y, Nishime C, Kajimura M, et al. 18F-FDG-labeled red blood cell PET for blood-pool imaging: preclinical evaluation in rats. EJNMMI Res. (2017) 7:19. doi: 10.1186/s13550-017-0266-3
24. Wu Z, Li L, Liu S, Yakushijin F, Yakushijin K, Horne D, et al. Facile preparation of a thiol-reactive (18)F-labeling agent and synthesis of (18)F-DEG-VS-NT for PET imaging of a neurotensin receptor-positive tumor. J Nucl Med. (2014) 55:1178–84. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.137489
25. Shen BQ, Xu K, Liu L, Raab H, Bhakta S, Kenrick M, et al. Conjugation site modulates the in vivo stability and therapeutic activity of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat Biotechnol. (2012) 30:184–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2108
Keywords: 18F-vinyl sulfone, red blood cell, blood pool imaging, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, positron emission tomography (PET)
Citation: Zhang X, Wang L, Fu W, Feng Y, Zeng C, Zhou L, Zhang T, Xu T, Cao J, Li Z and Chen Y (2021) 18F-PEG1-Vinyl Sulfone-Labeled Red Blood Cells as Positron Emission Tomography Agent to Image Intra-Abdominal Bleeding. Front. Med. 8:646862. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.646862
Received: 28 December 2020; Accepted: 02 June 2021;
Published: 05 July 2021.
Edited by:
Xiaoli Lan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, ChinaReviewed by:
Shuang Liu, Purdue University, United StatesDawei Jiang, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Wang, Fu, Feng, Zeng, Zhou, Zhang, Xu, Cao, Li and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zibo Li, zibo_li@med.unc.edu; Yue Chen, chenyue5523@126.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship