Erkan Alpsoy
Pietro Leccese
Giacomo Emmi
Shigeaki Ohno- 1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
- 2Rheumatology Department of Lucania, Rheumatology Institute of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza and Matera, Italy
- 3Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
- 4Ophthalmology Center, Aishin Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
- 5Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Behçet's disease (BD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory, multisystem disease of unknown etiology. The disease has a wide clinical spectrum of mucocutaneous lesions and ocular, vascular, articular, neurologic, gastrointestinal and cardiac involvement. Although the number of effective drugs used in the disease's treatment has increased in recent years, BD is still associated with severe morbidity because of mainly mucocutaneous, articular and ocular symptoms and an increased mortality because of large vessel, neurological, gastrointestinal and cardiac involvement. Many factors are associated with a more serious course, such as male gender and a younger age of onset. While the severity of the disease is more pronounced in the first years of the disease, it decreases in most patients after the age of forties. The primary goal of treatment should be the prevention of irreversible organ damage. Therefore, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment and close follow-up are mandatory to reduce the morbidity and mortality of the disease. Treatment varies depending on the organ involved and the severity of the involvement. For all these reasons, the treatment should be personalized and arranged with a multidisciplinary approach according to the organs involved. Treatment is mainly based on suppression of the inflammatory attacks of the disease using local and systemic immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drugs. In this review, based on the mainly controlled studies and personal experience in clinical practice and basic research in this field, we propose a stepwise, symptom-based, algorithmic approach for the management of BD with a holistic perspective.
Introduction
Behçet's disease (BD) is a chronic, relapsing and debilitating inflammatory multisystem disease of unknown etiology (1). Although the disease has been defined as a trisymptom complex characterized by recurrent oral ulcers (OU), genital ulcers (GU), and uveitis, subsequent studies have shown that BD spectrum includes different clinical phenotypes affecting the joints, central nervous system, major blood vessels, heart, and gastrointestinal tract (2). Although BD is more common in “Silk Road” populations, it has a universal distribution (3). The interplay between a complex genetic background and both innate and adaptive immune system is related to the BD clinical features (4–6). Due to the lack of a universally recognized pathognomonic laboratory test, the diagnosis is based on clinical criteria. The International Study Group criteria are the most widely used and well-accepted criteria among the experts of this field (7). Recently, a new set of criteria including vascular and neurological involvement has also been proposed through an international collaborative effort (8). Given the complexity of the disease therapeutic approach varies according to the different clinical involvement and phenotypes.
Clinical Features
Mucocutaneous Lesions
Mucocutaneous lesions are the distinctive clinical feature of BD. Their frequent occurrence at the beginning or at any stage of the disease emphasizes the importance of mucocutaneous lesions for diagnosis. OU, GU and cutaneous lesions, together with ocular and articular involvement, are the most frequent clinical manifestations (3). Mucocutaneous lesions can cause serious problems in patients' quality of life and psychosocial worlds. OU, GU, erythema nodosum (EN)-like lesions, papulopustular lesions (PPL), or other less common cutaneous lesions (e.g., extragenital ulcers, Sweet's syndrome-like and pyoderma gangrenosum-like lesions) may cause significant pain and/or loss in function (3, 9–11).
Articular Involvement
Articular involvement is observed in approximately half of the patients and is characterized by non-deforming arthritis, which often presents with monoarticular or oligoarticular pattern. It is usually transient, with episodes lasting from a few days to weeks. The knee is the most frequently affected joint, followed by the ankle, wrist and elbow (12). Diri et al. (13) reported that papulopustular lesions (PPL) are seen more frequently in BD patients with arthritis.
Ocular Involvement
Ocular involvement, one of the most serious and disabling complications of BD, is seen in approximately half of the patients. It is characterized by recurrent, explosive inflammatory attacks that can lead to blindness if left untreated. Recently, visual prognosis has improved significantly with the use of new treatments (e.g., anti TNF-alpha agents) (14). Ocular involvement is more common and severe in male patients (15). Bilateral involvement is seen in 86% of patients (15). Ocular lesions comprise anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and more frequently posterior uveitis and panuveitis. Repeated intraocular inflammation causes major ocular complications (e.g., secondary cataract, secondary glaucoma, cystoid macular edema) often causing severe decreased vision or blindness (16). Therefore, the strategy for treating ocular BD should be not only for the suppression and treatment of uveitis but also for the prevention of ocular complications (16, 17).
Vascular Involvement
Vascular involvement is one of the most important causes of mortality in BD. Although BD can affect vessels of any size and type (18), venous system is the major affected site, and superficial and deep vein thrombosis are the most frequent type of vascular involvements. Thromboses of the inferior and superior vena cava, dural sinuses and Budd-Chiari syndrome can also be seen and are associated with poor prognosis. Although rare, pulmonary artery aneurysm is the most common cause of death (19).
Neurological Involvement
Neurological involvement is one of the most serious complications of the disease because of its severe prognosis. Neurological symptoms affecting 5–10% of all patients are more common in men. It is distinguished in the parenchymal (pNBD) and non-parenchymal form. NBD can be characterized by single-acute attack, relapsing-remitting or chronic progressive course. Rapid disease progression, history of frequent relapses and presence of cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis are associated with poor prognosis (20). The therapeutic approach depends on the type of involvement and should be started immediately.
Gastrointestinal Involvement
Gastrointestinal involvement is reported in ~3–16% of patients and is more common in far eastern countries. It is characterized by punched-out mucosal ulcers occurring predominantly ileocecal region, although it can occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and bleeding are the most common symptoms. Deep punched-out ulcers are responsible for the most common intestinal complications such as severe bleeding and perforation. Intestinal lesions are considered as being a poor prognostic factor (21).
Course
BD follows a chronic course with unpredictable inflammatory attacks and remission periods. Male gender and early age of onset are associated with severe disease. Each or any combination of the mucocutaneous, articular, and ocular symptoms can cause significant physical and psychological morbidity. BD has an increased mortality rate, especially in young men, due to involvement of the pulmonary artery and other large vessels, neurological, gastrointestinal and cardiac involvement (22). BD usually starts with relatively mild symptoms; severe involvement occurs later (11, 23).
Treatment
Treatment varies depending on involved organ/s, the severity and duration of involvement, the frequency of attacks, gender and patient's age. At present, no specific recommendations based on gender or age exist for all the manifestations of BD; however, age and early disease can influence the treatment of ocular involvement. Nevertheless, the primary goal of treatment should be rapidly to suppress and prevent new inflammatory attacks to avoid irreversible organ damage, especially in the early, active stages of BD. Randomized controlled trials are limited to mucocutaneous, articular and ocular involvement. In this review, we propose a symptom-based, algorithmic treatment approach. Although the recommendations are mainly based on controlled studies, important studies, guidelines, expert reviews and finally, our personal experience in clinical practice is also included.
Treatment Algorithms
Activity spectrum of topical and systemic therapeutic agents (24–59) on BD in randomized, controlled studies is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. The main topical and systemic therapeutic agents used in the treatment of Behçet's disease in randomized, controlled studies.
Topical Treatment
Corticosteroids alone (triamcinolone acetonide in oral paste or dexamethasone ointment) for OU and in combination with antiseptics (e.g., fusidic acid/betamethasone) for GU are useful, especially when used in the early stages of these lesions (31, 60, 61). Sucralfate reduces pain while accelerating healing in both OU and GU. Pentoxifylline 5% gel decreases the duration and pain of OU (27). Pimecrolimus is an effective and safe compound in GU treatment (28, 29, 61). Wet dressings such as aluminum acetate 3–5% are useful in the early stages of EN-like lesions and STP (60).
Since OU because of BD is similar to recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) the treatments recommended for RAS can be applied to OU of BD. Topical antibiotics (e.g., tetracyclines and their derivatives), antimicrobial agents (chlorhexidine), amlexanox, triclosan are beneficial by accelerating healing and can be used first-line treatments. Hydroxypropyl cellulose, diclofenac, lidocaine, silver nitrate, CO2 laser, Nd:YAG laser is useful in decreasing pain and can be used as second-line options (3, 60).
Systemic Treatment
1-Mucocutaneous Manifestations
Colchicine can be used as the first-line treatment of mucocutaneous lesions (22, 37–39, 62). Benzathine penicillin can be added to colchicine to increase the effectiveness (40). Apremilast is another important alternative with proven efficacy in the treatment of mucocutaneous lesions (33, 63). Azathioprine can be used in patients inadequately controlled with the treatments above (34). Cyclosporine, interferon (IFN)-α and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents are effective in patients who cannot be controlled with previous treatments (42, 45, 49, 50, 64). Thalidomide is often helpful (58). However, it should be used with caution in selected patients because of potential side effects. Levamisole, dapsone, rebamipide, zinc sulfate, isotretinoin, methotrexate, pentoxifylline, secukinumab and ustekinumab are other alternatives (22, 48, 53–55, 59, 62, 64–66) (Figure 1A).
Figure 1. Treatment algorithms of mucocutaneous (A), articular (B), ocular (C), vascular (D), neurologic (E) and gastrointestinal (F) symptoms. In the flow charts all treatments were placed one under the other in the right columns. Algorithms start from the boxes in the upper left corner. The green arrow means “yes,” the red arrow means “no”.
Levamisole (54), dapsone (48), zinc sulfate (59), and isotretinoin (53) treatments could be considered in the earlier steps of the algorithm because of the availability of controlled studies. However, there have not been publications about these treatments in the recent years. Also, newer and more effective treatments have appeared in recent years. Since the effect of rebamide is limited to OU, it could not be evaluated at earlier steps in the algorithm (59).
In acute and severe attacks of mucocutaneous lesions (e.g., major OU, GU, and/or EN-like lesions), corticosteroids (prednisolone, initial dose 40–60 mg daily for 2–4 weeks, tapered over the ensuing 4–6 weeks) can be used as an effective treatment. In this case, corticosteroids are used in addition to previous treatment. If the patient does not receive any systemic treatment, it would be more appropriate to combine it with a treatment such as colchicine (3, 62).
Articular Involvement
Colchicine is often chosen as the first-line treatment to prevent arthritis attacks (38). In patients unresponsive to colchicine monotherapy, the addition of benzathine penicillin may be beneficial (67). Azathioprine can be considered in patients with recurrent arthritis and/or with resistant disease. IFN-α and anti-TNF-α agents may be used in even more severe but uncommon cases (68–72). Although systemic corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used to treat arthritis-related symptoms, the evidence from controlled studies with azapropazone or intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate was disappointing (35, 41). Intraarticular corticosteroid injections can be considered in patients with monoarthritis even as an adjunct to systemic therapy, but evidence from randomized clinical trials is lacking (22). Limited data suggests ustekinumab, secukinumab and anti-IL-1 agents as alternative treatment options (65, 73, 74) (Figure 1B).
Ocular Involvement
Treatment of ocular BD firstly needs to suppress and manage acute inflammation in the anterior uvea, retina, retinal vessels, choroid and optic disc in the exacerbation stage. Since ocular lesions suddenly reappear with unclear triggering factors, it is important to prevent subsequent ocular inflammatory attacks during the ocular convalescent stage (16, 17) (Figure 1C).
In acute ocular attack, topical eye drops of corticosteroid and mydriatics should be given. Subconjunctival corticosteroid injection may sometimes be required in patients with an acute attack limited to the anterior part of the eye. Depending on the severity of ocular fundus inflammation, corticosteroid injection of the posterior sub-Tenon and oral corticosteroid therapy can be recommended besides topical corticosteroids and mydriatics. In unresponsive cases or in the presence of posterior segment involvement, azathioprine and/or Cyclosporine should be initiated in addition to systemic corticosteroids (22). Anti-TNF-α agents or IFN-α should be the treatments to be considered in the next step in patients who cannot be controlled by this treatment or in those with acute sight-threatening ocular presentation (16, 17, 22, 62).
In the convalescent stage, if there is no ocular inflammatory attack, treatment is unnecessary and only close inspection of clinical signs is sufficient. Azathioprine with or without low-dose corticosteroids should be given in those who have recurrent ocular attacks. If clinical convalescence is kept with no ocular recurrence for 6 months or longer, azathioprine can be continued. However, if the patient has recurrent ocular attacks, especially in the ocular fundus, there may be a risk of decreased visual function. In this case, cyclosporine should be started with or without previous therapy (17). Anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab or adalimumab) or IFN-α should be given with or without oral cyclosporine, azathioprine and/or oral prednisolone if previous treatments are insufficient (75–77). It is difficult to avoid decreased visual function in patients inadequately controlled with anti-TNF-α agents or IFN-α; here, other new treatments such as IL-1 inhibitors should be considered (78).
Vascular Involvement
The treatment of vascular BD manifestations differs according to the involved district, and to the specific type of event. However, in BD patients, different types of vascular involvement can coexist in the same patients, not necessarily simultaneously. This peculiar aspect suggests that all the vascular events have similar pathogenic pathways, mainly driven by inflammatory mechanisms (1, 79–81). The inflammatory nature of vascular events in BD, deeply influences the treatment approach (Figure 1D).
Venous Involvement
In patients with venous involvements of typical sites (deep vein thrombosis of the legs and arms), corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents represent the mainstay treatment (79–82). Immunosuppressive therapy is pivotal to prevent recurrences and to reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome, whereas the use of anticoagulants in deep vein thrombosis is still controversial (19). According to current recommendations, there is no valid data to prefer one immunosuppressant over another. However, evidence suggests the choice of azathioprine, Cyclosporine or cyclophosphamide (22).
In patients with refractory venous thrombosis, anti-TNF-alpha agents, alone or in combination with traditional DMARDs (83, 84), or interferon-alpha, can be considered (85), eventually in association with anticoagulants. In the latter case, patient's specific bleeding risk should be considered, and the presence of aneurysms should be always evaluated.
Conversely, the association of anticoagulant to immunosuppressive therapy is suggested in case of extensive thrombosis of larger veins, particularly of vena cava; in this case, cyclophosphamide is preferred to the other immunosuppressive agents (22).
Similarly, the triple association of steroids, immunomodulating/immunosuppressive agents (colchicine, eventually combined with azathioprine and/or cyclophosphamide), and anticoagulants seem to be the most effective choice also in case of intracardiac thrombosis (19).
Arterial Involvement
Immunosuppressants should always be considered to achieve complete remission and prevent post-operative complications. The concomitant use of anticoagulants might be beneficial, particularly to reduce the risk of post-operative thrombosis (19).
According to EULAR recommendations, patients presenting with pulmonary artery involvement (PAI) should start high-dose corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, whereas the use of anticoagulants in this condition is negligible. In patients refractory to this first-line treatment, anti-TNF-α agents (mainly infliximab) can represent a life-saving treatment (86). Eventually, embolisation, lobectomy, cavitectomy, and decortication can be considered (87–89).
For aortic and pulmonary artery aneurysm (PAA), pharmacological treatment is mainly based on immunosuppressants, namely cyclophosphamide or azathioprine, mostly in combination with corticosteroids and with surgery (90, 91). Anti-TNF-α agents can be considered for refractory cases (22).
Neurological Involvement
In the acute phase of pNBD, the first-line therapy is represented by high-dose intravenous corticosteroids (500–1,000 mg daily for 3–5 consecutive days) followed by slow oral tapering. Decisions about dosage and treatment duration are based on the severity of attack and the clinician's judgment. Therefore, the steroid reduction schedule is not standardized and it should be done accordingly to clinical response (Figure 1E).
To treat pNBD, an immunosuppressive agent such as azathioprine should be started besides high-dose corticosteroids. In clinical practice to assess tolerability to azathioprine it is possible to start with lower doses (1–1.5 mg/kg/day) and increase gradually every 5–7 days up to the maximum therapeutic dosage (2.5 mg/kg/day).
In patients with severe clinical presentation or poor prognostic factors, anti-TNF-α agents or cyclophosphamide can be considered as a first-line therapy. Cyclophosphamide can be administrated orally (1–3 mg/kg/day) or by intravenous pulse (500–1,000 mg/m2 every month for 6–9 months). A retrospective study comparing three different therapeutic regimens (corticosteroids alone, azathioprine+corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide + corticosteroids) reported no significant differences in terms of long-term outcome although patients with a severe disability at baseline treated with high-dose corticosteroids plus intravenous cyclophosphamide had a longer event-free survival (92).
Anti-TNF-α agents have been associated with a high response rate. More than 80% of NBD patients showed good clinical response. Therefore, anti-TNF-α agents reduces the risk of relapses and progression of disability (22, 72, 93–95).
Because of limited scientific evidence, other drugs such as IFN-α, methotrexate, mycofenolate mofetile, anti-IL 6 or anti-IL-1 agents should be considered in selected cases as alternative options (73, 96–101).
Cyclosporine seems to be associated with an increased risk of developing pNBD although the reason is unknown. Cyclosporine should be discontinued or avoided in patients with pNBD (64).
The treatment of venous sinus thrombosis is based on high-dose corticosteroids in association with short-term anticoagulation. Usually immunosuppressive treatment is not needed in patients at first episode but should be considered in relapsing cases. Azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophamide and anti-TNF-α agents can be used. The choice of treatment should be based on patient's characteristics, disease severity and involvement of other organs. Long-term anticoagulation may be useful in patients with relapsing disease and/or hypercoagulability state (85, 102).
So far, no evidence from controlled studies are available for the treatment of NBD and a phase 3 randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of infliximab to that of cyclophosphamide in severe BD is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03371095).
Gastrointestinal Involvement
The pharmacological treatment of gastrointestinal involvement varies according to its severity. While milder cases should be initially treated with 5-amino salicylate derivatives (e.g., sulfasalazine, mesalamine), azathioprine should be considered in unresponsive or more severe cases (22). Oral or intravenous high-dose corticosteroids should be considered in the most severe cases (21, 103). The true risk-benefit profile of high-dose corticosteroids is still a matter of debate (104) and current evidence on their efficacy in gastrointestinal involvement is inadequate to recommend their routine use in clinical practice (103) (Figure 1F).
In case of severe enteric manifestations poorly controlled by azathioprine, anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab or adalimumab) (105, 106) and/or of thalidomide should be considered (107, 108).
Some evidence suggests that other immunomodulating therapies including methotrexate, interferon, cyclosporine, and intravenous immunoglobulins can also effectively control gastrointestinal symptoms (103). However, given the poor evidence supporting their routine use, these treatments should be considered as a fourth-line option for gastrointestinal involvement.
Conclusions
Because of the high incidence of vital organ involvement, regular follow-up and appropriate management of BD is mandatory. Because of its multisystemic nature, collaboration among the related specialities to improve patient outcomes is requisite. In this respect, there is a need for organizations where physicians experienced in the disease can serve together. Multi-center, large-series controlled studies should be encouraged to get optimal patient management, especially in organ involvement with high mortality (e.g., vascular, neurological, gastrointestinal).
Author Contributions
All authors: writing, revision of the manuscript, acquisition of clinical data, and conception and design.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Bettiol A, Prisco D, Emmi G. Behçet: the syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). (2020) 59(Suppl. 3):iii101–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez626
2. Sallakci N, Bacanli A, Coskun M, Yavuzer U, Alpsoy E, Yegin O. CTLA-4 gene 49A/G polymorphism in Turkish patients with Behçet's disease. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2005) 30:546–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01846.x
3. Alpsoy E. Behçet's disease: a comprehensive review with a focus on epidemiology, etiology and clinical features, and management of mucocutaneous lesions. J Dermatol. (2016) 43:620–32. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13381
4. Leccese P, Alpsoy E. Behçet's disease: an overview of etiopathogenesis. Front Immunol. (2019)10:1067. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01067
5. Alpsoy E, Kodelja V, Goerdt S, Orfanos CE, Zouboulis CC. Serum of patients with Behçet's disease induces classical (pro-inflammatory) activation of human macrophages in vitro. Dermatology. (2003) 206: 225–32. doi: 10.1159/000068888
6. Emmi G, Prisco D. Behçet's syndrome: focus on pathogenetic background, clinical phenotypes and specific treatments. Intern Emerg Med. (2019) 14:639–43. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02154-9
7. International Study Group for Behçet's Disease. Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet's disease. Lancet. (1990) 335:1078–80.
8. International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ITR-ICBD). The international criteria for Behçet's disease (ICBD): a collaborative study of 27 countries on the sensitivity and specificity of the new criteria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2014) 28:338–47. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12107
9. Alpsoy E, Zouboulis CC, Ehrlich CE. Mucocutaneous lesions of Behçet's disease. Yonsei Med J. (2007) 48:573–85. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.4.573
10. Alpsoy E, Aktekin M, Er H, Durusoy C, Yilmaz E. A randomized, controlled and blinded study of papulopustular lesions in Turkish Behcet's patients. Int J Dermatol. (1998) 37:839–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00401.x
11. Alpsoy E, Donmez L, Onder M, Gunasti S, Usta A, Karincaoglu Y, et al. Clinical features and natural course of Behçet's disease in 661 cases: a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol. (2007) 157:901–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08116.x
12. Dalvi SR, Yildirim R, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome. Drugs. (2012) 72:2223–41. doi: 10.2165/11641370-000000000-00000
13. Diri E, Mat C, Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Hizli N, Yazici H. Papulopustular skin lesions are seen more frequently in patients with Behçet's syndrome who have arthritis: a controlled and masked study. Ann Rheum Dis. (2001) 60:1074–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.11.1074
14. Accorinti M, Pesci FR, Pirraglia MP, Abicca I, Pivetti-Pezzi P. Ocular Behçet's disease: changing patterns over time, complications and long-term visual prognosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2017) 25:29–36. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2015.1094095
15. Namba K, Goto H, Kaburaki T, Kitaichi N, Mizuki N, Asukata Y, et al. A major review: current aspects of ocular Behçet's disease in Japan. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2015) 23(Suppl. 1):S1–23. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2014.981547
16. Ohno S, Namba K, Takemoto Y. Behcet' s disease. In: Zierhut M, Pavesio C, Ohno S, Orefice F, Rao NA, Springer-Verlag, editors. Intraocular Inflammation. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York, NY; Dordrecht; London: Springer-Verlag (2016). p. 785–95.
17. Mizuki N, Takeuchi M. (editors) Treatment algorithm of ocular Behcet's disease. In: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Behcet's Disease 2020. Tokyo: Shindanto Chiryosha (2020). p. 56–57 (In Japanese).
18. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, Basu N, Cid MC, Ferrario F, et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. (2013) 65:1–11. doi: 10.1002/art.37715
19. Emmi G, Bettiol A, Silvestri E, Di Scala G, Becatti M, Fiorillo C, et al. Vascular Behçet's syndrome: an update. Intern Emerg Med. (2019) 14:645–52. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1991-y
20. Kalra S, Silman A, Akman-Demir G, Bohlega S, Borhani-Haghighi A, Constantinescu CS, et al. Diagnosis and management of Neuro-Behçet's disease: international consensus recommendations. J Neurol. (2014) 261:1662–76. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7209-3
21. Hisamatsu T, Ueno F, Matsumoto T, Kobayashi K, Koganei K, Kunisaki R, et al. The 2nd edition of consensus statements for the diagnosis and management of intestinal Behçet's disease: indication of anti-TNFα monoclonal antibodies. J Gastroenterol. (2014) 49:156–62. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0872-4
22. Hatemi G, Christensen R, Bang D, Bodaghi B, Ferhat Celik A, Fortune F, et al. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of Behçet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. (2018) 77:808–18. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213225
23. Ugurlu N, Bozkurt S, Bacanli A, Akman-Karakas A, Uzun S, Alpsoy E. The natural course and factors affecting severity of Behçet's disease: a single-center cohort of 368 patients. Rheumatol Int. (2015) 35:2103–7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3310-5
24. Ergun T, Gürbüz O, Yurdakul S, Hamuryudan V, Bekiroglu N, Yazici H. Topical cyclosporine-A for treatment of oral ulcers of Behçet's syndrome. Int J Dermatol. (1997) 36:720. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1997.tb03133.x
25. Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Rosenkaimer F, Yazici H. Inefficacy of topical alpha interferon in the treatment of oral ulcers of Behçet's syndrome: a randomized, double blind trial. Br J Rheumatol. (1991) 30:395–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/30.5.395-a
26. Kiliç H, Zeytin HE, Korkmaz C, Mat C, Gül A, Coşan F, et al. Low-dose natural human interferon-alpha lozenges in the treatment of Behçet's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). (2009) 48:1388–91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep237
27. Hatemi G, Yurttas B, Kutlubay Z, Cote T, Derkunt S, Yazici Y, et al. Pentoxifylline Gel for Oral Ulcers in Patients with Behçet's Syndrome [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2019) 71(Suppl. 10). Available online at: https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pentoxifylline-gel-for-oral-ulcers-in-patients-with-behcets-syndrome/
28. Kose O, Dinc A, Simsek I. Randomized trial of pimecrolimus cream plus colchicine tablets versus colchicine tablets in the treatment of genital ulcers in Behçet's disease. Dermatology. (2009) 218:140–5. doi: 10.1159/000182257
29. Chams-Davatchi C, Barikbin B, Shahram F, Nadji A, Moghaddassi M, Yousefi M, et al. Pimecrolimus versus placebo in genital aphthous ulcers of Behcet's disease: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Int J Rheum Dis. (2010) 13:253–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2010.01531.x
30. Alpsoy E, Er H, Durusoy C, Yilmaz E. The use of sucralfate suspension in the treatment of oral and genital ulcerations of Behçet's disease: a randomised, placebo-controlled and double-blind study. Arch Dermatol. (1999) 135:529–32. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.5.529
31. Fani MM, Ebrahimi H, Pourshahidi S, Aflaki E, Shafiee Sarvestani S. Comparing the effect of phenytoin syrup and triamcinolone acetonide ointment on aphthous ulcers in patients with Behcet's syndrome. Iran Red Crescent Med J. (2012) 14:75–8.
32. Davies UM, Palmer RG, Denman AM. Treatment with acyclovir does not affect orogenital ulcers in Behçet's syndrome: a randomized double-blind trial. Br J Rheumatol. (1988) 27:300–2. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/27.4.300
33. Hatemi G, Melikoglu M, Tunc R, Korkmaz C, Turgut Ozturk B, Mat C, et al. Apremilast for Behçet's syndrome–a phase 2, placebo-controlled study. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:1510–18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408684
34. Yazici H, Pazarli H, Barnes CG, Tüzün Y, Ozyazgan Y, Silman A, et al. A controlled trial of azathioprine in Behcet's syndrome. N Engl J Med. (1990) 322:281–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199002013220501
35. Moral F, Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Yazici H. Ineficacy of azapropazone in the acute arthritis of Behçet's syndrome: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (1995) 13:493–5.
36. Davatchi F, Shahram F, Chams H, Akbarian M. Pulse cyclophosphamide (PCP) for ocular lesions of Behçet's disease: double blind crossover study. Arthritis Rheum. (1999) 42:S320.
37. Aktulga E, Altac M, Muftuoglu A, Ozyazgan Y, Pazarli H, Tuzun Y, et al. A double blind study of colchicine in Behcet's disease. Haematologica. (1980) 65:399–402.
38. Yurdakul S, Mat C, Tuzun Y, Ozyazgan Y, Hamuryudan V, Uysal O, et al. A double-blind trial of colchicine in Behcet's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. (2001) 44:2686–92. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200111)44:11<2686::AID-ART448>3.0.CO;2-H
39. Davatchi F, Sadeghi Abdollahi B, Tehrani Banihashemi A, Shahram F, Nadji A, Shams H, et al. Colchicine versus placebo in Behçet's disease: randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover trial. Mod Rheumatol. (2009) 19:542–9. doi: 10.3109/s10165-009-0200-2
40. Calguneri M, Ertenli I, Kiraz S, Erman M, Celik I. Effect of prophylactic benzathine penicillin on mucocutaneous symptoms of Behcet's disease. Dermatology. (1996) 192:125–8. doi: 10.1159/000246336
41. Mat C, Yurdakul S, Ozyazgan Y, Uysal S, Uysal O, Yazici H. A double-blind trial of depot corticosteroids in Behçet's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). (2006) 45:348–52. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei165
42. Masuda K, Nakajima A, Urayama A, Nakae K, Kogure M, Inaba G. Double-masked trial of cyclosporin versus colchicine and long-term open study of cyclosporin in Behcet's disease. Lancet. (1989) 20:1093–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92381-7
43. BenEzra D, Cohen E, Chajek T, Friedman G, Pizanti S, de Courten C, et al. Evaluation of conventional therapy versus cyclosporine A in Behçet's syndrome. Transplant Proc. (1988) 20:136–43.
44. Elidan J, Cohen E, Levi H, BenEzra D. Effect of cyclosporine A on the hearing loss in Behçet's disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (1991) 100:464–8. doi: 10.1177/000348949110000607
45. Assaad-Khalil SH. Low-dose cyclosporin in Behçet's disease: follow-up controlled study with emphasis on extraocular manifestations and neuro-Behçet's disease, In: O'Duffy JD, Kokmen E, editors. Behçet's Disease: Basic and Clinical Aspects. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker (1991). p. 603–12.
46. Ozyazgan Y, Yurdakul S, Yazici H, Tuzun B, Işçimen A, Tuzun Y, et al. Low dose cyclosporin A versus pulsed cyclophosphamide in Behçet's syndrome: a single masked trial. Br J Ophthalmol. (1992) 76:241–3. doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.4.241
47. Buggage RR, Levy-Clarke G, Sen HN, Ursea R, Srivastava SK, Suhler EB, et al. A double-masked, randomized study to investigate the safety and efficacy of daclizumab to treat the ocular complications related to Behçet's disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2007) 15:63–70. doi: 10.1080/09273940701299370
48. Sharquie KE, Najim RA, Abu-Raghif AR. Dapsone in Behcet's disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. J Dermatol. (2002) 29:267–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2002.tb00263.x
49. Melikoglu M, Fresko I, Mat C, Ozyazgan Y, Gogus F, Yurdakul S, et al. Short-term trial of etanercept in Behcet's disease: a double blind, placebo controlled study. J Rheumatol. (2005) 32:98–105.
50. Alpsoy E, Durusoy C, Yilmaz E, Ozgurel Y, Ermis O, Yazar S, et al. Interferon alpha-2a in the treatment of Behçet disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled and double blind study. Arch Dermatol. (2002) 138:467–71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.138.4.467
51. Lightman S, Taylor SR, Bunce C, Longhurst H, Lynn W, Moots R, et al. Pegylated interferon-alpha-2b reduces corticosteroid requirement in patients with Behcet's disease with upregulation of circulating regulatory T cells and reduction of Th17. Ann Rheum Dis. (2015) 74:1138–44. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205571
52. Kötter I, Vonthein R, Schoenfisch B, Xenitidis T, Doycheva D, Henes J, et al. Interferon alpha2a versus cyclosporin A for the treatment of severe ocular Behçet's disease-A prospective, randomized, single blind, national multi center trial (INCYTOB). Ann Rheum Dis. (2016) 75(Suppl. 2):1091. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.2780
53. Sharquie KE, Helmi RM, Noiami AA, Al-Hayani RK, Kadhom MA. The therapeutic role of isotretinoin in the management of Behçet's disease: a single-blinded, controlled therapeutic study. J Drugs Dermatol. (2013) 12:e68–73.
54. Lehner T, Wilton JMA. The therapeutic and immunological effects of levamisole in recurrent oral ulcers and Behçet's syndrome. In: Lehner T, Barnes CB, editors. Behçet's Syndrome: Clinical and Immunological Features. New York, NY: Academic Press (1979). p. 291–305.
55. Matsuda T, Ohno S, Hirohata S, Miyanaga Y, Ujihara H, Inaba G, et al. Efficacy of rebamipide as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of recurrent oral aphthous ulcers in patients with Behçet's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Drugs R D. (2003) 4:19–28. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200304010-00002
56. Davatchi F, Shams H, Rezaipoor M, Sadeghi-Abdollahi B, Shahram F, Nadji A, et al. Rituximab in intractable ocular lesions of Behcet's disease; randomized single-blind control study (pilot study). Int J Rheum Dis. (2010) 13:246–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2010.01546.x
57. Dick AD, Tugal-Tutkun I, Foster S, Zierhut M, Melissa Liew SH, Bezlyak V, et al. Secukinumab in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis: results of three randomized, controlled clinical trials. Ophthalmology. (2013) 120:777–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.040
58. Hamuryudan V, Mat C, Saip S, Ozyazgan Y, Siva A, Yurdakul S, et al. Thalidomide in the treatment of the mucocutaneous lesions of the Behçet syndrome. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. (1998) 128: 443–50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-6-199803150-00004
59. Sharquie KE, Najim RA, Al-Dori WS, Al-Hayani RK. Oral zinc sulfate in the treatment of Behcet's disease: a double blind cross-over study. J Dermatol. (2006) 33:541–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2006.00128.x
60. Alpsoy E. Behçet's disease: treatment of mucocutaneous lesions. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2005) 23:532–9.
61. Leccese P, Ozguler Y, Christensen R, Esatoglu SN, Bang D, Bodaghi B, et al. Management of skin, mucosa and joint involvement of Behçet's syndrome: a systematic review for update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of Behçet's syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2019) 48:752–62. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.05.008
62. Alpsoy E, Akman A. Behçet's disease: an algorithmic approach to its treatment. Arch Dermatol Res. (2009) 301:693–702. doi: 10.1007/s00403-009-0990-2
63. Lopalco G, Venerito V, Leccese P, Emmi G, Cantarini L, Lascaro N, et al. Real-world effectiveness of apremilast in multirefractory mucosal involvement of Behçet's disease. Ann Rheum Dis. (2019) 78:1736–7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215437
64. Bettiol A, Hatemi G, Vannozzi L, Barilaro A, Prisco D, Emmi G. Treating the different phenotypes of Behçet's syndrome. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2830. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02830
65. Fagni F, Bettiol A, Talarico R, Lopalco G, Silvestri E, Urban ML, et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab for treatment of refractory mucosal and articular Behçet's phenotype: a multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis. (2020) 79:1098–104. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217108
66. Baerveldt EM, Kappen JH, Thio HB, van Laar JAM, van Hagen PM, Prens EP. Successful long-term triple disease control by ustekinumab in a patient with Behçet's disease, psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. Ann Rheum Dis. (2013) 72:626–7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202392
67. Calguneri M, Kiraz S, Ertenli I, Benekli M, Karaarslan Y, Celik I. The effect of prophylactic penicillin treatment on the course of arthritis of Behçet's disease: a randomised clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. (1996) 39:2062–5. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391216
68. Alpsoy E, Yilmaz E, Basaran E. Interferon therapy for Behçet's disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1994) 31:617–9. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(94)70226-8
69. Hamuryudan V, Moral F, Yurdakul S, Mat C, Tuzun Y, Ozyazgan Y, et al. Systemic interferon alpha 2b treatment in Behçet's syndrome. J Rheumatol. (1994) 21:1098–100.
70. Kötter I, Vonthein R, Zierhut M, Eckstein AK, Ness T, Günaydin I, et al. Differential efficacy of human recombinant interferon-alpha2a on ocular and extraocular manifestations of Behçet disease: results of an open 4-center trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2004) 33:311–9. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2003.09.005
71. Calguneri M, Ozturk MA, Ertenli I, Kiraz S, Apras S, Ozbalkan Z. Effects of interferon alpha treatment on the clinical course of refractory Behçet's disease: an open study. Ann Rheum Dis. (2003) 62:492–3. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.5.492
72. Vallet H, Riviere S, Sanna A, Deroux A, Moulis G, Addimanda O, et al. Efficacy of anti-TNF alpha in severe and/ or refractory Behçet's disease: multicenter study of 124 patients. J Autoimmun. (2015) 62:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.06.005
73. Emmi G, Talarico R, Lopalco G, Cimaz R, Cantini F, Viapiana O, et al. Efficacy and safety profile of anti-interleukin-1 treatment in Behçet's disease: a multicenter retrospective study. Clin Rheumatol. (2016) 35:1281–6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-3004-0
74. Mirouse A, Barete S, Desbois AC, Comarmond C, Sène D, Domont F, et al. Long-term outcome of ustekinumab therapy for Behçet's disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2019) 71:1727–32. doi: 10.1002/art.40912
75. Silvestri E, Bitossi A, Bettiol A, Emmi G, Urban ML, Mattioli I, et al. Adalimumab effectively controls both anterior and posterior noninfectious uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory diseases: focus on Behçet's syndrome. Inflammopharmacology. (2020) 28:711–8. doi: 10.1007/s10787-020-00697-4
76. Fabiani C, Sota J, Vitale A, Emmi G, Vannozzi L, Bacherini D, et al. Ten-Year retention rate of infliximab in patients with Behçet's disease-related uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2019) 27:34–9. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2017.1391297
77. Tugal-Tutkun I, Güney-Tefekli E, Urgancioglu M. Results of interferon-alfa therapy in patients with Behçet uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2006) 244:1692–5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0346-y
78. Fabiani C, Vitale A, Rigante D, Emmi G, Lopalco G, Di Scala G, et al. The presence of uveitis is associated with a sustained response to the interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors anakinra and canakinumab in Behçet's disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2020) 28:298–304. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2018.1511810
79. Emmi G, Becatti M, Bettiol A, Hatemi G, Prisco D, Fiorillo C. Behçet's syndrome as a model of thrombo-inflammation: the role of neutrophils. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1085. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01085
80. Becatti M, Emmi G, Silvestri E, Bruschi G, Ciucciarelli L, Squatrito D, et al. Neutrophil activation promotes fibrinogen oxidation and thrombus formation in Behçet disease. Circulation. (2016) 133:302–11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017738
81. Emmi G, Bettiol A, Niccolai E, Ramazzotti M, Amedei A, Pagliai G, et al. Butyrate rich diets improve redox status and fibrin lysis in Behçet's syndrome. Circ Res. (2021) 128:278–80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317789
82. Emmi G, Mannucci A, Argento FR, Silvestri E, Vaglio A, Bettiol A, et al. Stem-cell-derived circulating progenitors dysfunction in Behçet's syndrome patients correlates with oxidative stress. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2877. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02877
83. Desbois AC, Biard L, Addimanda O, Lambert M, Hachulla E, Launay D, et al. Efficacy of anti-TNF alpha in severe and refractory major vessel involvement of Behcet's disease: a multicenter observational study of 18 patients. Clin Immunol. (2018) 197:54–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2018.08.004
84. Emmi G, Vitale A, Silvestri E, Boddi M, Becatti M, Fiorillo C, et al. Adalimumab-based treatment versus disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for venous thrombosis in Behçet's syndrome: a retrospective study of seventy patients with vascular involvement. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2018) 70:1500–7. doi: 10.1002/art.40531
85. Saadoun D, Wechsler B, Resche-Rigon M, Trad S, Le Thi Huong D, Sbai A, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis in Behçet's disease. Arthritis Rheum. (2009) 61:518–26. doi: 10.1002/art.24393
86. Hamuryudan V, Seyahi E, Ugurlu S, Melikoglu M, Hatemi G, Ozguler Y, et al. Pulmonary artery involvement in Behçet?s syndrome: effects of anti-Tnf treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2015) 45:369–73. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.06.008
87. Seyahi E, Melikoglu M, Akman C, Hamuryudan V, Ozer H, Hatemi G, et al. Pulmonary artery involvement and associated lung disease in Behçet disease: a series of 47 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). (2012) 91:35–48. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318242ff37
88. Rossi GM, Emmi G, Vaglio A. Hemoptysis in Behçet's syndrome: from bedside to bench? Intern Emerg Med. (2018) 13:467–9. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1863-5
89. Voiriot G, Parrot A, Antoine M, Gibelin A, Haddad S, Carette MF, et al. Transcatheter embolotherapy of pulmonary artery aneurysms as emergency treatment of hemoptysis in Behcet patients: experience of a referral center and a review of the literature. Intern Emerg Med. (2018) 13:491–500. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1817-y
90. Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Moral F, Numan F, Tuzun H, Tuzuner N, et al. Pulmonary arterial aneurysms in Behçet's syndrome: a report of 24 cases. Br J Rheumatol. (1994) 33:48–51. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.1.48
91. Hamuryudan V, Er T, Seyahi E, Akman C, Tüzün H, Fresko I, et al. Pulmonary artery aneurysms in Behçet syndrome. Am J Med. (2004) 117:867–70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.05.027
92. Noel N, Bernard R, Wechsler B, Resce-Rigon M, Depaz R, et al. Long-term outcome of neuro-Behçet's disease. Arthritis Rheum. (2014) 66:1306–14. doi: 10.1002/art.38351
93. Kikuchi H, Aramaki K, Hirohata S. Effect of infliximab in progressive neuro-Behcet's syndrome. J Neurol Sci. (2008) 272:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.05.002
94. Zeydan B, Uygunoglu U, Saip S, Demirci ON, Sayahi E, Ugurlu S, et al. Infliximab is a plausible alternative for neurologic complications of Behçet disease. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. (2016) 3:e258 doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000258
95. Ozguler Y, Leccese P, Christensen R, Esatoglu SN, Bang D, Bodaghi B, et al. Management of major organ involvement of Behçet's syndrome: a systematic review for update of the EULAR recommendations. Rheum Oxford. (2018) 57:2200–12. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key242
96. Hirohata S, Kikuchi H, Sawada T, Nagafuchi H, Kuwana M, Takeno M, et al. Retrospective analysis of long-term outcome of chronic progressive neurological manifestations in Behcet's disease. J Neurol Sci. (2015) 349:143–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.01.005
97. Monastirli A, Chroni E, Georgiou S, Ellul J, Pasmatzi E, Papathanasopoulos P, et al. D. Interferon-α treatment for acute myelitis and intestinal involvement in severe Behçet's disease. QJM. (2010) 103:787–90. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq125
98. Nichols JC, Ince A, Akduman L, Mann ES. Interferon-alpha 2a treatment of neuro-Behcet disease. J Neuroophthalmol. (2001) 21:109–11. doi: 10.1097/00041327-200106000-00011
99. Shugaiv E, Tuzun E, Mutlu M, Kiyat-Atamer A, Kurtuncu M, Akman-Demir G. Mycophenolate mofetil as a novel immunosuppressant in the treatment of neuro- Behcet's disease with parenchymal involvement: presentation of four cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2011) 29(Suppl. 67):S64–7.
100. Addimanda O, Pipitone N, Pazzola G, Salvarani C. Tocilizumab for severe refractory neuro-Behçet: three cases IL-6 blockade in neuro-Behçet. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2015) 44:472–5. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.08.004
101. Cantarini L, Vitale A, Scalini P, Dinarello CA, Rigante D, Franceschini R, et al. Anakinra treatment in drug-resistant Behcet's disease: a case series. Clin Rheumatol. (2015) 34:1293–301. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2443-8
102. Ferro JM, Canhão P, Stam J, Bousser MG, Barinagarrementeria F, ISCVT Investigators. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke. (2004) 35:664–70. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000117571.76197.26
103. Hisamatsu T, Hayashida M. Treatment and outcomes: medical and surgical treatment for intestinal Behçet's disease. Intest Res. (2017) 15:318–27. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.318
104. Esatoglu SN, Hatemi G. Update on the treatment of Behçet's syndrome. Intern Emerg Med. (2019) 14:661–75. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02035-1
105. Park YE, Cheon JH. Updated treatment strategies for intestinal Behçet's disease. Korean J Intern Med. (2018) 33:1–19. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.377
106. Iwata S, Saito K, Yamaoka K, Tsujimura S, Nawata M, Hanami K, et al. Efficacy of combination therapy of anti-TNF-α antibody infliximab and methotrexate in refractory entero-Behçet's disease. Mod Rheumatol. (2011) 21:184–91. doi: 10.3109/s10165-010-0370-y
107. Sayarlioglu M, Kotan MC, Topcu N, Bayram I, Arslanturk H, Gul A. Treatment of recurrent perforating intestinal ulcers with thalidomide in Behçet's disease. Ann Pharmacother. (2004) 38:808–11. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D524
Keywords: algorithms, therapeutics, morbidity, mortality, Behçet's disease
Citation: Alpsoy E, Leccese P, Emmi G and Ohno S (2021) Treatment of Behçet's Disease: An Algorithmic Multidisciplinary Approach. Front. Med. 8:624795. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.624795
Received: 02 November 2020; Accepted: 01 March 2021;
Published: 28 April 2021.
Edited by:
Peter Korsten, University Medical Center Göttingen, GermanyReviewed by:
Farhad Shahram, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, IranMitsuhiro Takeno, Nippon Medical School, Japan
Copyright © 2021 Alpsoy, Leccese, Emmi and Ohno. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Erkan Alpsoy, ealpsoy@akdeniz.edu.tr