Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 23 February 2021
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Case Report: Refusal of an Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Due to Malignant Disease? — An Extremely Rare Form of Cardiac Involvement in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

\nViviane Zotzmann,
Viviane Zotzmann1,2*Tobias Wengenmayer,Tobias Wengenmayer1,2Corinna N. Lang,Corinna N. Lang1,2Dawid L. Staudacher,Dawid L. Staudacher1,2Katharina Mueller-PeltzerKatharina Mueller-Peltzer3Fabian BambergFabian Bamberg3Reinhard MarksReinhard Marks4Christoph Bode,Christoph Bode1,2Ralph WschRalph Wäsch4
  • 1Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
  • 2Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany
  • 3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
  • 4Department of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology, and Stem-Cell Transplantation), Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

We report here on a 61-year-old patient with acute right heart failure of unclear etiology. Echocardiography revealed a myocardial mass infiltrating the heart, though, we assumed a cardiac lymphoma. A VA-ECMO was implanted as bridging for diagnosis and therapy. Our patient received chemotherapy, under which the tumor (of unknown etiology at this point) reached a partial remission. Nine months after first admission the patient developed acute myeloid leukemia with DNMT3a and TET2 mutations. Retrospective analysis of the cardiac biopsy revealed the identical mutations and matched with the diagnosis of an extremely rare primary extramedullary manifestation of an AML (myelosarcoma). The patient received induction-chemotherapy and was planned for consolidating allogeneic stem cell transplantation. From this case, we conclude that an extracorporeal therapy should be discussed in selected patients even in case of an initially fatal appearing prognosis. In selected cases, extracorporeal support can generate enough time for diagnosis and therapy. However, transparent planning, including discussion of best supportive care strategies involving the patient's family are indispensable requirements for starting ECMO in such patients.

Introduction

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) describes a method for cardiopulmonary bypass using of a pump-driven circulation, in which venous deoxygenated blood is extracorporeally enriched with oxygen. It is indicated for potentially reversible, life-threatening forms of cardiac failure as “bridge to recovery,” “bridge to next decision” or “bridge to transplant or assist device” (1). There is hardly any data on the implantation of VA-ECMO in adult cancer patients (24).

It is well-known that prolonged use of ECMO support increases the risk of morbidity, mostly due to thrombotic, and hemorrhagic complications (5). Nosocomial infections may even be triggered by impairment of cellular immunity, cytopenia and chemotherapy, and may dis- suade clinicians from using ECMO support in these patients (6, 7).

More precisely, malignancies are regarded as a relative contraindication for VA-ECMO support and the extracorporeal therapy community shows utmost restraint in applying extracorporeal therapy for cancer patients. Some authors argue that implementation of ECMO support should only be taken into consideration in cases for whom a 100% mortality would be expected with lower-level interventions (8).

Case Report

Medical History

A 61-year-old man without any pre-existing conditions was admitted to our center with malaise, night sweat, a weight loss of 11 kg over the last 6 months, and increasing dyspnea for 2 weeks (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Timeline: patient's course over time.

Clinical Course

He presented with shortness of breath (NYHA III) and pronounced edema of both legs. The ECG showed atrial fibrillation, the X-ray of the chest a pulmovenous congestion and a large pleural effusion. Abdominal and thoracic CT-scan (Figure 2) showed multiple mediastinal and mesenterial lymph nodes, a bilateral perirenal mass and a large pericardial lymph node conglomerate with infiltration of the right atrium, ventricle, and parts of the aorta ascendens. Blood smear and flow cytometry of the peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) biopsy appeared normal without indication for a hematological neoplasia.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. TU tumor mass-infiltration in the right ventricular wall and around the aortic root (A,B shows the heart and tumor mass in transversal view; C sagittal view on the heart and the tumor-formation) RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle.

Echocardiography (Figure 3) showed a severe impairment of the right ventricle due to a pronounced hypertrophy of the free right ventricular wall and a tumor (50 × 60 mm) right next to the right ventricular wall. These findings corresponded to the patient's severe right heart failure symptoms. Before being able to perform a mini-laparotomy for analyzing an abdominal lymph node, the patient experienced a cardiac arrest, had to be resuscitated, and was transferred to our ICU.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Echocardiography. (A,B) At day 0: showing a pericardial tumor and hypertrophy of the right ventricle wall. (C,D) At day 16: showing no hypertrophy or tumor mass any more. TU, tumor mass; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle.

Despite high doses of catecholamine's and volume resuscitation hemodynamics could not be stabilized (increasing lactat level 17 mmol/L, SAPS II 64, SAFE score −6). Assuming a lymphoma-infiltration of the right ventricle as a potentially curative disease a VA-ECMO was implanted as a “bridge to diagnostic and therapy.”

In suspicion of a lymphoma-infiltration as cause for the life-threatening right heart failure, we decided to immediately start chemotherapy the same day—CHOEP without Doxorubicin due to cardio-toxicity.

After clinical stabilization, a myocardial biopsy and an abdominal lymph node extirpation were performed while still on VA-ECMO support. There were no signs of myocarditis and histology and immunohistochemistry showed no lymphocytic infiltration of the myocardium and only reactive changes of the lymph node, most likely due to the chemotherapy. Consistent with this observation lymph nodes, pericardial tumor and hypertrophy of the right ventricle wall were rapidly regressive and the right heart function improved dramatically during the chemotherapy course.

Nine days later the patient could be weaned from the respirator, after 10 days he recovered from renal failure and after 16 days VA-ECMO could be explanted.

The course was complicated by an Aspergillus pneumoniae during neutropenia and had to be treated for 23 days. Due to the good response with regress of the cardiac infiltration and decline of the abdominal lymph nodes, the patient received the second cycle including rituximab (R-CHOEP), at day 21.

A CT-Scan (4 weeks later) showed a partial remission of the tumors. The tumor-mass around the aorta ascendens, near the right ventricle and at the upper kidney pole showed decreased diameters. He could be discharged from hospital 7 weeks after admission.

In the following months, the patient received four more cycles of chemotherapy, under which the tumor was kept stable in a partial remission.

Eight month after the first admission he was again admitted to our hospital after a dermal biopsy showed a diffuse dermal infiltration of immature myeloid cells (70%). BM biopsy now confirmed an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a blast count of 70–80% and suppression of the normal hematopoiesis. Molecular genetic testing revealed mutations in NPM1, DNMT3a and TET2. These results prompted us to search for these mutations in the initial cardiac biopsy. Indeed, the DNMT3A-mutation and the TET2-mutation were detected. Retrospectively, the initial infiltration of the right ventricle wall matched with a myeloid sarcoma. Nine months after first admission the patient received induction chemotherapy with a planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation for consolidation.

Discussion

Cardiac Involvement of Lymphomas and Leukemia

The incidence of primary cardiac tumors is rare, ranging from 0.001 to 0.03% in autopsies (9, 10). The most prevalent primary malignant tumors are cardiac sarcomas, of which angiosarcoma is the most common in adults (37%) (11). Among primary cardiac malignancies lymphomas are extremely rare (1–2%) and are found especially in immunosuppressed patients (12). They are mostly Non-Hodgkin-B cell type and preferentially involve the right atrium (6).

A secondary involvement of the heart has been seen in 8.7–27.2% of the lymphoma patients (12). Prognosis of patients with cardiac tumors is in general poor. Mean overall survival ranges from 1 to 12 months (9, 13). However, in patients with cardiac lymphoma and adequate treatment long-term survival can be reached.

AML may present in a variety of extramedullary tissues with or without bone marrow disease. Extramedullary involvement is a relatively rare, but clinically significant phenomenon that often poses therapeutic dilemmas. Myeloid sarcoma (MS) and leukemia cutis (LC) represent two extramedullary manifestations. MS is reported in 2.5–9.1% of patients with AML (14, 15) and occurs concomitantly, following, or rarely, preceding the onset of bone marrow involvement (16).

Isolated MS, defined by the absence of a history of leukemia, MDS, or myeloproliferative neoplasm and a negative bone marrow biopsy, has been described in very few case reports (17).

In a series reporting autopsies of AML patients, involvement of the myocardium with MS was found to occur in <1% of the patients (18). Many of these patients are often misdiagnosed with lymphoma (19, 20). Generally, patients with MS are considered as having high-risk AML with a poor prognosis.

Ethical, Medical, and Technical Challenge

Our patient presented with a worsening, severe cardiogenic shock with right heart failure due to a tumorous infiltration of the right myocardium. Without extracorporeal support, this patient would have probably died in the next 24 h. However, numerous medical and ethical challenges may arise when installing VA-ECMO in patients with known malignancy.

For instance, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) lists contraindications for applying extracorporeal support in patients such as chronic organ dysfunction like emphysema, cirrhosis, or renal failure. Moreover, an unrecoverable heart condition is an absolute contraindication for VA-ECMO support per se when the patient is no candidate for a permanent mechanical assist device. In our case, etiology of right heart failure was unclear, however, we assumed a potentially curable cardiac lymphoma.

Bleeding complications, arterial embolism and limb ischemia are typical complications of a VA-ECMO therapy. In particular, the thrombocytemia to be expected under chemotherapy and the increased risk of bleeding with an already known intracerebral bleeding rate of 21% under ECMO therapy in non-cancer patients (21) represent a high risk for the patient (relative contraindication).

Additionally, ECMO support is associated with nosocomial infections (6). The impairment of cellular immunity, cytopenia, and chemotherapy may further increase the risks of infection.

ECMO support is associated with high rates of mortality per se. It is important to understand that the extracorporeal support does not support or specifically treat the heart itself. It just delivers the amount of extracorporeal cardiac output to maintain organ function. However, patients with chronic organ dysfunctions are less likely to survive profound shock situations, for that some very invasive procedures are withheld from them after individual considerations. ECMO support is a highly invasive, cost and resource intense therapy and comes with the cost of serious side effects. From this point of view, it is reasonable that chronic organ failure is a relative contraindication for ECMO support.

Our patient presented without chronic organ failure, but with an undiagnosed, and untreated disease.

Due to the known risks and the relative contraindications, the published experience with VA-ECMO in children and adult patients with hematologic malignancies is limited to some single cases and a registry analysis (24, 22). One of these cases is about a child who suffered cardiac arrest when first diagnosed with T-lymphoblastic lymphoma that infiltrates the heart.

After implantation of a VA-ECMO, chemotherapy was carried out under ECMO support and the patient was finally able to be discharged home on the 28th day. This case was able to demonstrate the usefulness and feasibility of chemotherapy while on ECMO-support (22).

After in-depth discussion with the patient's family, we decided to implant the VA-ECMO with the aim of “bridge to diagnosis and therapy” assuming a potentially curable disease.

Conclusion

ECMO has become a lifesaving therapy in patients with severe cardiac impairment. From this case, we conclude that an extracorporeal therapy should at least be discussed in selected patients even in case of an initially fatal appearing prognosis. Once extracorporeal support is installed a thoroughly but fast diagnostic workup has to be achieved to enable a therapy start as soon as possible.

In selected cases extracorporeal support can generate valuable days of diagnosis and therapy. However, transparent planning, including discussion of best supportive care strategies involving the patient's family are indispensable requirements for starting such a therapy.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Consent for Publication

The patient himself gave his oral consent and his wife the written consent for publication to the treatment team.

Author Contributions

VZ was the major contributor in writing the manuscript. CL and CB revised the manuscript. KM-P created the figures. FB revised the manuscript. TW and DS designed figures and revised the manuscript. RM and RW revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The Baden-Wuerttemberg Ministry of Science, Research, Art, and University of Freiburg funded the article processing charge in the funding program Open Access Publishing.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; LA, left atrium; TU, tumor mass; LI, liver; PE, pericardial effusion; PB, peripheral blood; BM, bone marrow; VA-ECMO, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ELSO, extracorporeal life support organization; ECLS, extracorporeal life support; R-CHOEP, Chemotherapy including rituximab, cyclophosphamid, doxorubicin, vincristin, etoposid, prednisolone.

References

1. Lunz D1, Philipp A, Dolch M, Born F, Zausig YA. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Indications, limitations and practical implementation. Anaesthesist. (2014) 63:625–35. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2362-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Metzler EC, Ivascu NS, Acres CA, Stark M, Furman RF, Fins JJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to chemotherapy in an orthodox jewish patient. Oncologist. (2014) 19:985–9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gow KW, Lao OB, Leong T, Fortenberry JD. Extracorporeal life support for adults with malignancy and respiratory or cardiac failure: the extracorporeal life support expierence. Am. J. Surg. (2010) 199:669–75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Allain G, Hajj-Chahine J, Lacroix C, Jayle C. Primary cardiac lymphoma complicated by cardiogenic shock: successful treatment with chemotherapy delivered under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2015) 48:968–70. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Worku B, DeBois W, Sobol I, Gulkarov I, Horn EM, Salemi A. Extracorporeal mem- brane oxygenation as a bridge through che- motherapy in B-cell lymphoma. J Extra Corpor Technol. (2015) 47:52–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

6. Schmidt M, Bréchot N, Hariri S, Guiguet M, Luyt CE, Makri R, et al. Nosocomial infections in adult cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Infect Dis. (2012) 55:1633–41. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis783

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Aubron C, Cheng AC, Pilcher D, Leong T, Magrin G, Cooper DJ, et al. Infections ac- quired by adults who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: risk factors and out- come. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. (2013) 34:24–30. doi: 10.1086/668439

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Prabhu AD, Mos K, Karl TR, Anderson B. Ex- tracorporeal life support in the acute management of tumour lysis syndrome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. (2012) 15:568–9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs233

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Butany J, Nair V, Nassemuddin A, Nair GM, Catton C, Yau T. Cardiac tumours: diagnosis and management. Lancet Oncol. (2005) 6:219–28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70093-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Patel J, Seppard MN. Pathological study of primary cardial tumours in a specialist UK Centre: surgical and autopsy series. Cardiovasc Pathol. (2010) 19:343–52. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2009.07.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Burke AP, Cowan D, Virmani R. Primary sarcomas of the heart. Cancer. (1992) 69:387–953. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920115)69:2<387::AID-CNCR2820690219>3.0.CO;2-N

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lam KY, Dickens P, Chan AC. Tumors of the heart. A 20-year experience with a review of 12.485 autopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (1993) 117:1027–31.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Liao WI, Tsai SH, Chiu SK. Successful use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a hematopoietic stem cell transplant patient with idiopathic pneumonia syndrome. Respir Care. (2013) 58:e6–10. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Liu PI, Ishimaru T, McGregor DH, Okada H, Steer A. Autopsy study of granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma) in patients with myelogenous leukemia, Hiroshima-Nagasaki 1949-1969. Cancer. (1973) 31:948–55. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197304)31:4<948::AID-CNCR2820310428>3.0.CO;2-N

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Neiman RS, Barcos M, Berard C, Bonner H, Mann R, Rydell RE, et al. Granulocytic sarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 61 biopsied cases. Cancer. (1981) 48:1426–37. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810915)48:6<1426::AID-CNCR2820480626>3.0.CO;2-G

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Krause JR. Granulocytic sarcoma preceding acute leukemia: a report of six cases. Cancer. (1979) 44:1017–21. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197909)44:3<1017::AID-CNCR2820440333>3.0.CO;2-I

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Eshghabadi M, Shojania AM, Carr I. Isolated granulocytic sarcoma: report of a case and review of the literature. J Clin Oncol. (1986) 4:912–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.6.912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Cash T, Beton D, Mian A. Cardiac myeloid sarcoma: a case report and a review of literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2011) 33:e330–2. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182329b6b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Meis JM, Butler JJ, Osborne BM, Manning JT. Granulocytic sarcoma in nonleukemic patients. Cancer. (1986) 58:2697–709. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861215)58:12<2697::AID-CNCR2820581225>3.0.CO;2-R

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Byrd JC, Edenfield WJ, Shields DJ, Dawson NA. Extramedullary myeloid cell tumors in acute non lymphocytic leukemia: a clinical review. J Clin Oncol. (1995) 13:1800–16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1800

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Fletcher-Sandersjöö A, Bartek J Jr, Thelin EP, Eriksson A, Elmi-Terander A, Broman M, et al. Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an observational cohort study. J Intensive Care. (2017) 5:27. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0223-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Frey TKE, Chopra A, Lin RJ, Levy RJ, Gruber P, Rheingold SR, et al. A child with anterior mediastinal mass supported with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2006) 7:479–81. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000235247.10880.F8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia, cardiac myeloid sarcoma, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, right heart failure, ECLS, AML, VA-ECMO

Citation: Zotzmann V, Wengenmayer T, Lang CN, Staudacher DL, Mueller-Peltzer K, Bamberg F, Marks R, Bode C and Wäsch R (2021) Case Report: Refusal of an Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Due to Malignant Disease? — An Extremely Rare Form of Cardiac Involvement in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Front. Med. 8:584507. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.584507

Received: 17 July 2020; Accepted: 04 February 2021;
Published: 23 February 2021.

Edited by:

Hong-Hu Zhu, Zhejiang University, China

Reviewed by:

Vikas Bansal, Mayo Clinic, United States
Aysun Tekin, Mayo Clinic, United States

Copyright © 2021 Zotzmann, Wengenmayer, Lang, Staudacher, Mueller-Peltzer, Bamberg, Marks, Bode and Wäsch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Viviane Zotzmann, viviane.zotzmann@universitaets-herzzentrum.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.