Abstract
With the recognition of dermoscopy as a new medical technology and its available fee assessment in Korea comes an increased interest in imaging-based dermatological diagnosis. For the dermatologist, who treats benign tumors and malignant skin cancers, imaging-based evaluations can assist with determining the surgical method and future follow-up plans. The identification of the tumor's location and the existence of blood vessels can guide safe treatment and enable the use of minimal incisions. The recent development of high-resolution microscopy based on laser reflection has enabled observation of the skin at the cellular level. Despite the limitation of a shallow imaging depth, non-invasive light-based histopathologic examinations are being investigated as a rapid and pain-free process that would be appreciated by patients and feature reduced time from consultation to treatment. In the United States, the current procedural terminology billing code was established for reflectance confocal microscopy in 2016 and has been used for the skin cancer diagnosis ever since. In this review, we introduce the basic concepts and images of ultrasound imaging, optical coherence tomography, confocal microscopy, and two-photon microscopy and discuss how they can be utilized in the field of dermatological oncology.
Introduction
Efforts to diagnose skin cancer without skin biopsy are ongoing. The diagnoses of patients with suspected skin cancer are confirmed by punch biopsy followed by histopathological examination, which involve the collection of a small portion of the entire lesion to diagnose skin cancer (1). In this case, since only vertical information of a specific region is acquired, dermoscopy can supplement horizontal information of the entire lesion to identify the most suitable biopsy site. However, dermoscopy has an inherent depth limit confined to the upper dermis (Table 1).
Table 1
| Skin biopsy | Dermoscopy | |
|---|---|---|
| Advantages | 1. Provide universal validity based on long-term accumulated histopathological criteria | 1. Identify optimal biopsy sites 2. Reduce unnecessary biopsy 3. Determine horizontal extent of skin lesion 4. Continue to observe lesion treatment |
| Disadvantages | 1. Limitation of evaluating whole lesion by vertical information of specific region 2. Limitations of repeated practice due to pain, bleeding, and infection risk | 1. Inherent depth limitation (upper dermis) 2. Difficulty implementing 3D image 3. No reflection of functional and dynamic information (blood flow velocity, oxygen saturation, etc.) of the skin |
Pros and cons of skin biopsy and dermoscopy.
To observe lesions deep to the upper dermis, the maximum depth that can be observed with dermoscopy, non-invasive techniques, such as confocal microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound must be used. Although each operation principle is different, they all use the reflection characteristic as if it is mirrored, and the skin's depth and resolution differ among device types (Table 2). Here we briefly discuss each available device and its clinical use in the dermatology field.
Table 2
| Resolution | Penetration depth | |
|---|---|---|
| Confocal microscopy | 1 μm | ~500 μm |
| Optical coherence tomography | 2–10 μm | ~2 mm |
| Ultrasonography | 150 μm | ~10 cm |
| High-resolution computed tomography | 300 μm | Entire body |
| Magnetic resonance imaging | 1 mm | Entire body |
Device resolution and imaging depths1.
Ultrasound Imaging
Ultrasound imaging uses high-frequency sound waves that cannot be heard by the human ear. When it is sent inside the human body, the degree of absorption and reflection is cut off depending on the constituents and the reflected sound waves are sensed and imaged (2). Therefore, the probe that sends and detects the sound waves forms the core equipment for ultrasound technology. Higher-frequency (MHz) sound waves enable high-resolution observation of the skin surface, but the observable depth decreases. In the field of dermatology, ultrasound is mainly used to identify benign tumor type and extent (Table 3). Before surgery, it can provide information about tumor type and size, locate the existence of surrounding vessels, identify the best location for the incision, and set the range while viewing the ultrasound screen in real time with the patient. It can also help the clinician evaluate whether the tumor was completely removed after surgery (Figure 1).
Table 3
| Tumor type | Year | Main findings | Correlation with histopathological findings | Probe frequency | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal cell carcinoma (3) | 2008 | 1. BCC tumor ultrasound shows an oval and hypoechoic lesion 2. Compare tumor thickness measurements between ultrasound and histology | Good thickness correlation with histology (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.9) | 7–15 MHz probe | 25 patients |
| Basal cell carcinoma (4) | 2007 | Lesions that may have a higher aggressive potential may also appear as hyperechoic spots | Hypersonographic spots in BCCs seemed to correspond to calcification, horn cysts, or clusters of apoptotic cells in the centers of nests of basal cell carcinoma | 15 or 30 MHz | 29 basal cell carcinomas |
| Invasive squamous cell carcinoma (5) | 2009 | SCC metastasized to lymph node showed asymmetrical cortical area with high elasticity | Presence of metastatic tumor cells located asymmetrically in a small section of the cortical area | Not mentioned | 1 patient |
| Merkel cell carcinoma (6) | 2017 | 1. Hypoechoic pattern with variable vascularization 2. Useful in the diagnostic work-up of MCC and can help more precisely delimit the tumor prior to complete surgical resection | Not mentioned | 18 MHz | 7 patients |
| Pilomatricoma (7) | 2005 | Well-defined mass with inner echogenic foci and a peripheral hypoechoic rim or a completely echogenic mass with strong posterior acoustic shadowing | Inner echogenic foci may relate with calcification or ossification | 7–12 MHz | 20 pilomatricomas from 19 patients |
| Trichilemmal cyst (TC) (8) | 2019 | Well-defined hypoechoic lesions with internal calcification and posterior sound enhancement | TC contains homogeneous eosinophilic keratinous materials Calcified foci within this keratin can be found | 3–12 MHz 6–18 MHz | 54 TCs from 50 patients |
| Ruptured epidermal cyst (REC) (9) | 2008 | RECs were classified into three types: with lobulations showing echogenic inner contents (type I), with protrusions (type II), and with abscess pocket formations showing poorly defined pericystic changes and increased vascularity around the abscess formation (type III) | Histopathology of the excised RECs also showed similar morphology | 5–10 MHz 5–12 MHz | 13 patients |
| Lipoma in the forehead (10) | 2016 | 1. Hyperechoic striated septae parallel to the skin suggestive of lipoma 2. Ultrasonographic findings were accurate in 9 of 14 cases (64.3%). | Unlike the preoperative ultrasonographic findings, 13 of 14 cases were confirmed as frontalis-associated lipomas intraoperatively | 12 or 15 MHz | 14 patients with lipomas in the forehead |
Key articles comparing ultrasound imaging and histopathology.
Figure 1
In the case of epidermoid cysts, one of the most common benign tumors, it is often seen as a well-defined ovoid-shaped heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion in the subcutaneous layer with strong posterior acoustic enhancement (Figure 2). Ultrasonographic findings corresponding to epidermal cyst rupture include pericystic changes, increased vascularity, deep abscess formation, and others (9). Trichilemmal cyst, a benign appendage lesion derived from the outer root sheath of the hair follicle, is often seen as a well-defined hypoechoic lesion with internal calcification and posterior sound enhancement (Figure 3) (8). Identifying these sites just prior to surgery and optimizing the incision site and approach can improve the success rate and reduce recurrence rates.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Pilomatricoma, a benign superficial tumor of the hair follicle, is often seen as a well-defined mass with inner echogenic foci and a peripheral hypoechoic rim or a completely echogenic mass with strong posterior acoustic shadowing in the subcutaneous layer on ultrasonography (Figure 4) (7). Pilomatricoma often shows angiographic findings and may be difficult to differentiate from hemangioma.
Figure 4
A lipoma appears as a well-defined hypoechoic mass with multiple echogenic strands on ultrasound (Figure 5). If the encapsulation is well-formed, it is easier to remove. Ultrasonography is especially useful for diagnosing and treating lipoma in the forehead. A lipoma occurring in the forehead is often located under the frontalis muscles, and it is important to confirm its precise position using preoperative ultrasonography. It typically has a semispherical shape when located under the muscles and an ovoid shape when it is located in the subcutaneous fat layer (Figure 6) (11). However, this is not always the case, so a comprehensive judgment should be made by checking whether it is close to the periosteum or using a special technique that uses the angulation of the probe to point out the lateral borders of the lesion (12).
Figure 5
Figure 6
There are no obvious criteria that can diagnose malignant cutaneous tumors using ultrasound imaging. However, tumor size >5 cm, infiltrated margins, rapid clinical growth, moderate to severe intratumoral hypervascularity (Figure 7), and an absence of the typical features of benign tumors are highly suggestive of malignancy (13, 14). High-definition ultrasound with transducers up to 70 MHz, which can observe more detail, has been used to diagnose cutaneous angiosarcoma of the breast and is expected to be useful for the identification of malignant skin cancers (15).
Figure 7
Optical Coherence Tomography
Optical coherence tomography (OCT), a three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique based on low coherence interferometry, creates an image by detecting the interference phenomena from light scattering or reflection as it passes through different layers of skin via the time domain or Fourier-domain method. OCT non-invasively provides skin images similar to the B mode of ultrasound to a depth of 1–2 mm and a resolution of 2–10 μm with high imaging speed. Functional OCT techniques that can provide additional information, such as polarization and vasculature were recently developed and applied for the detection of abnormal vasculature of a port-wine stain or skin cancer (16–18). Our research group developed a device that matches an OCT image with that obtained by dermoscopic imaging and provides more information than dermoscopy alone (19). Through this, we expect to be able to assess the extent of scar treatment (Figure 8). It is expected that a stage of nevus flammeus will be established, and treatment feasibility and degree will be evaluated (Figure 9). The limitations of OCT are limited depth of examination and lack of resolution to observe cancer cell morphology. Line-field confocal OCT, which can reveal comprehensive structural mapping of the skin at the cellular level with an isotropic spatial resolution of ~1 μm to a depth of ~500 μm, was recently reported to correlate with conventional histopathological images of skin tumors (20). Key articles comparing OCT and histopathology are summarized in Table 4.
Figure 8
Figure 9
Table 4
| Tumor type | Year | Type | Main findings | Correlation with histopathology findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (21) | 2014 | High-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) | Lobulated nodules, peripheral rimming, epidermal disarray | Peripheral rimming in HD-OCT correlates with peritumoral mucin deposition | 25 cases of BCC |
| BCC (22) | 2016 | Dynamic OCT enables the detection of blood flow in vivo and visualization of the skin microvasculature | Blood vessels varied from dilated, larger-than normal vessels to the smallest detectable vessels | Loose and more vascularized dermis between tumor nests | 1 patient with BCC on the cheek |
| BCC, Melanoma (20) | 2018 | Line-field confocal OCT | BCC: lobulated structures within the dermis, dark cleft due to mucin deposition; melanoma: general architectural disarrangement, disruption of the dermal-epidermal junction, pagetoid spread of atypical melanocytes | BCC and melanoma approximate shapes observed in OCT appeared similar histopathologically | 2 patients with BCC 2 patients with melanoma |
| Actinic keratosis (AK), Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (23) | 2015 | HD-OCT | Absence of an outlined dermo-epidermal junction on cross-sectional images allowed discriminating SCC from AK and normal skin | It related to irregular budding of the epidermis outstanding into the upper dermis and/or presence of periadenexal collars penetrating through the dermo-epidermal junction | 37 cases of AK 16 cases of SCC |
Key articles comparing optical coherence tomography and histopathology.
Confocal Microscopy
Confocal microscopy is based on the existence of one focal point when a laser, used as a light source, is reflected off a subject. The “out of focus” signal is blocked by a pinhole, and contrast is generated by reflections at the interfaces of tissue and cellular structures due to variations of the index of refraction. Since image acquisition is not possible with a single signal point, imaging occurs by scanning across several pinholes. Imaging up to a depth of 100–200 μm at a 1-μm resolution is possible. Confocal microscopy is capable of providing rapid bedside pathological analysis by producing images with subcellular resolution without skin biopsy and physical sectioning (24–26). There are two ways to use this approach for Mohs surgery. One is used in vivo and can help the identification of the surgical margins in a perioperative setting (27). It is also possible to check the remaining lesion using intraoperative images in vivo after removing the main skin cancer mass (28). The other is for ex vivo use, in which the surgical margins are removed and confocal microscopy is used to confirm whether the tumor remains within it (29). However, when used for detection in Mohs surgery, the grayscale confocal image was difficult to interpret by the surgeons. To improve this, each frozen specimen was stained with acridine orange (pH 6.0) and eosin (pH 6.0) and then scanned with confocal mosaicking microscopy to imitate hematoxylin and eosin-stained Mohs frozen sections. This approach and physician training can improve the accuracy of the non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosis (30). Key articles comparing confocal microscopy and histopathology are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5
| Tumor type | Year | Type | Main findings | Correlation with histopathological findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (31) | 2002 | Real-time, confocal reflectance microscopy (in vivo) | Confocal features correlated very well with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of the biopsy specimen | Features that were readily identified by both in vivo confocal microscopy and standard microscopy of H&E-stained sections included parakeratosis, actinic changes overlying the BCC, relative monomorphism of BCC cells, BCC nuclei exhibiting characteristic elongated or oval appearance, high nucleocytoplasmic ratios, and the presence of prominent nucleoli, increased vascularity, and prominent predominantly mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltrate | 8 BCC lesions |
| Actinic keratosis (AK), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), keratoacanthoma (32) | 2009 | Reflectance confocal microscopy (in vivo) | All 38 cases displayed an atypical honeycomb and/or disarranged pattern of the spinous-granular layer of the epidermis; round nucleated cells were seen in 20 SCCs (65%) and 1 AK (14%) Round blood vessels were seen in the superficial dermis in 28 SCCs (90%) and 5 AKs (72%) | Round nucleated cells at the spinous-granular layer correspond to atypical keratinocytes or dyskeratotic cells | A total of 38 lesions in 24 patients with 7 AKs, 25 SCCs in situ, 3 invasive SCCs, and 3 keratoacanthomas |
| Bowen disease (BD) (33) | 2012 | Reflectance confocal microscopy (in vivo) | Two types of targetoid cells were seen: those presenting as large, homogeneous, bright cells with a dark halo; and round ones with a dark center, surrounding bright rim, and dark halo | Targetoid cells correlated dyskeratotic cells with condensed, eosinophilic cytoplasm and a retraction halo. Dyskeratotic cells were correlated with a dark central nucleus and a surrounding clear retraction halo | 10 cases of BD |
| BCC (34) | 2013 | Comparison of reflectance confocal microscopy and multiphoton tomography findings (in vivo) | Elongated cells and palisading structures are easily recognized using both methods | Due to the higher resolution, changes in nucleus diameter or cytoplasm could be visualized using multiphoton tomography (MPT) Therefore, nucleus diameter, nucleus/cytoplasm ratio, and cell density are estimated for normal and BCC cells using MPT | 9 patients with BCC |
Key articles comparing confocal microscopy and histopathology.
Confocal microscopy has also been applied to diagnose mammary and extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) (37), frequently showing Paget cells predominantly within the epidermis (38). However, due to the limited depth of imaging (100–200 μm) when applied non-invasively, the invasion site is difficult to determine. A major limitation of this technique is that it can only provide morphological information and does not reflect the tissue's internal structure or functional state.
Two-photon Microscopy
Two-photon microscopy (TPM) is a technique that uses the fluorescence released after excitation from simultaneously absorbing two photons with long wavelengths and low energy. TPM allows observation of vital phenomena in cells and in vivo at the molecular level. In particular, it has the advantage of being able to identify the distribution of collagen within the dermis using the second harmonic generation (SHG) produced when two photons simultaneously interfere. Non-invasive in vivo multi-photon microscopy (MPM) imaging also reportedly provides label-free contrast and reveals several characteristic features of basal cell carcinoma lesions (39). This feature correlates well with histopathological examination, findings, and SHG in particular shows collagen and elastin bundles around the tumor (Figure 10) (Table 6).
Figure 10
Table 6
| Tumor type | Year | Type | Main findings | Correlation with histopathological findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (39) | 2015 | In vivo multiphoton microscopy (MPM) | 1. Nests of basaloid cells palisading in the peripheral cell layer at the dermoepidermal junction and/or in the dermis 2. Parallel collagen and elastin bundles surrounding the tumors 3. Mucinous stroma adjacent to tumor was visualized using MPM | These features generally correlated well with histopathologic examination. However, histologic examination revealed palisading of peripheral layers in some of the tumor nests of the lesion, although this feature was not obvious in the nests imaged with MPM. | 9 patients with a total of 10 BCC |
| Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS), superfical BCC (SBCC) (40) | 2008 | Ex vivo MPM | The following findings were seen: SCCIS: bowenoid dysplasia, multinucleated cells, or hyperkeratosis SBCC: peripheral palisading of tumor cells | The morphologic features differed significantly between these lesions and perilesional skin. | 5 specimens of SCCIS 6 specimens of SBCC |
| Actinic keratosis (AK), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (41) | 2016 | In vivo MPM | Changes in the morphology of the keratinocytes, such as broadened epidermis, large intercellular spaces, enlarged nucleus and a large variance in cell shape could easily be recognized. | AK: hyperparakeratosis and cell pleomorphism SCC: invasion of the dermis, keratin pearls and hyperchromatic nuclei | 6 patients with AK 6 patients with SCC |
| Benign and malignant melanocytic nevi (BMMN) (42) | 2014 | In vivo MPM | They evaluate BMMN using 9-point scale showing different values according to two-photon excited fluorescence and second harmonic generation of nevi. Indices corresponding to common nevi (0–1), dysplastic nevi (1-4), and melanoma (5-8) were significantly different (P < 0.05). | Prominent qualitative correlations included the morphology of epidermal keratinocytes, the appearance of nests of nevus cells surrounded by collagen fibers, and the structure of the epidermal–dermal junction. | 5 common nevi 5 dysplastic nevi 5 melanoma |
| BCC, SCC, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) (43) | 2019 | Ex vivo moxifloxacin labeling-based MPM | Moxifloxacin MPM imaged both cells and collagen in the skin, similarly to label-free MPM, but with enhanced fluorescence intensities in cells and enhanced imaging speeds. | Moxifloxacin MPM could detect specific cellular features of various skin cancers in good correlation with histopathological images at the higher imaging speed than label-free MPM. | 10 patients with BCC 1 patient with SCC 1 patient with DFSP |
Key articles comparing multiphoton microscopy and histopathology.
However, since TPM and MPM utilize weak endogenous fluorescence in tissue, there is a need for high excitation laser power and extension of pixel duration (44, 45). To overcome this limitation and reduce photodamage, moxifloxacin, an FDA-approved antibiotic, has been reported as a cell-labeling agent for MPM (46). Moxifloxacin has bright intrinsic multi-photon fluorescence, good tissue penetration, and high intracellular concentration. In addition, moxifloxacin-based MPM imaging is 10 times faster than imaging based on endogenous fluorescence (Figure 11) (46).
Figure 11
Although imaging depth remains a limitation, various methods to achieve a clear and high-resolution image are being developed. It is also expected that the diagnosis rate can be increased by tumor marker labeling. A recent report stated that in patients with EMPD, a subclinical extension can be assessed by MPM using whole-mount immunostaining with anti-cytokeratin 7 antibody to label Paget cells (35). These trials will be used in the ex vivo skin tissue to find the tumor's margins, and it is anticipated that it may replace frozen sections in the future. For more generalized clinical applications, the cost of the equipment is the greatest hinderance. MPM equipment is expensive because it uses a femtosecond laser (36).
Conclusion
In addition to ultrasonic devices that can closely observe the skin and deep structures, the development of dermatological equipment that unites laser and optical technology has shown visible progress. The principle of these devices is to analyze signals reflected or scattered from the skin, and there is a fundamental limitation that it is evaluated by looking into the mirror. These limitations are expected to improve in the near future by the development of fluorescent probes targeting tumors or diseases and will be used more actively for the diagnosis and treatment of skin lesions.
For dermatologists, this is a good opportunity to strengthen the specialty of dermatology. We are already familiar with laser equipment and have demonstrated a correlation between clinical and histopathological findings. When we use imaging equipment to further investigate a patient's skin and present objectively explainable data by linking “clinical imaging–histopathological findings,” a more robust doctor–patient relationship can be established.
Statements
Author contributions
BO conceived the concept and wrote the manuscript. KK co-conceived the concept and drafted the figures and tables. KC co-conceived the concept and edited and improved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- OCT
optical coherence tomography
- TPM
two-photon microscopy
- EMPD
extramammary Paget's disease
- SHG
second harmonic generation
- MPM
multi-photon microscopy
- BCC
basal cell carcinoma
- SCC
squamous cell carcinoma
- AK
actinic keratosis.
Abbreviations
Footnotes
1.^Available online at: http://obel.ee.uwa.edu.au/research/fundamentals/introduction-oct/
References
1.
ElstonDMStratmanEJMillerSJ. Skin biopsy: biopsy issues in specific diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2016) 74:1–16; quiz 7–8. 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.033
2.
KleinermanRWhangTBBardRLMarmurES. Ultrasound in dermatology: principles and applications. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2012) 67:478–87. 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.016
3.
BobadillaFWortsmanXMunozCSegoviaLEspinozaMJemecGB. Pre-surgical high resolution ultrasound of facial basal cell carcinoma: correlation with histology. Cancer Imaging. (2008) 8:163–72. 10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0026
4.
UharaHHayashiKKogaHSaidaT. Multiple hypersonographic spots in basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. (2007) 33:1215–9. 10.1097/00042728-200710000-00009
5.
AoyagiSIzumiKHataHKawasakiHShimizuH. Usefulness of real-time tissue elastography for detecting lymph-node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2009) 34:e744–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03468.x
6.
Hernandez-AraguesIVazquez-OsorioIAlfagemeFCiudad-BlancoCCasas-FernandezLRodriguez-BlancoMIet al. Skin ultrasound features of Merkel cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2017) 31:e315–8. 10.1111/jdv.14102
7.
HwangJYLeeSWLeeSM. The common ultrasonographic features of pilomatricoma. J Ultrasound Med. (2005) 24:1397–402. 10.7863/jum.2005.24.10.1397
8.
HePCuiLGWangJRZhaoBChenWXuY. Trichilemmal Cyst: clinical and sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med. (2019) 38:91–6. 10.1002/jum.14666
9.
JinWRyuKNKimGYKimHCLeeJHParkJS. Sonographic findings of ruptured epidermal inclusion cysts in superficial soft tissue: emphasis on shapes, pericystic changes, and pericystic vascularity. J Ultrasound Med. (2008) 27:171–6; quiz 7–8. 10.7863/jum.2008.27.2.171
10.
HuhJWKimMSChoiKHParkHJJueMS. The accuracy of ultrasonography on the location of lipomas in the forehead. Dermatol Surg. (2016) 42:191–4. 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000598
11.
OhBHSeoJChungKY. Surgical treatment of 846 patients with benign skin tumors: experience of a dermatologic surgeon in Korea. Korean J Dermatol. (2015) 53:202–8. Available online at: https://www.koreamed.org/article/0048KJD/2015.53.3.202
12.
WortsmanX. The accuracy of ultrasonography on location of lipomas in forehead. Dermatol Surg. (2017) 43:158–9. 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000835
13.
ChiouHJChouYHChiuSYWangHKChenWMChenTHet al. Differentiation of benign and malignant superficial soft-tissue masses using grayscale and color doppler ultrasonography. J Chin Med Assoc. (2009) 72:307–15. 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70377-6
14.
HungEHGriffithJFNgAWLeeRKLauDTLeungJC. Ultrasound of musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumors superficial to the investing fascia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2014) 202:W532–40. 10.2214/AJR.13.11457
15.
PerrotJLHabougitCBiron SchneiderACCouzanCTognettiLRubegniPet al. Role of reflectance confocal microscopy and HD ultrasound in the diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma of the breast. Ann Dermatol Venereol. (2019) 146:410–3. 10.1016/j.annder.2018.12.008
16.
ZhaoSGuYXuePGuoJShenTWangTet al. Imaging port wine stains by fiber optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. (2010) 15:036020. 10.1117/1.3445712
17.
MogensenMJoergensenTMNurnbergBMMorsyHAThomsenJBThraneLet al. Assessment of optical coherence tomography imaging in the diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer and benign lesions versus normal skin: observer-blinded evaluation by dermatologists and pathologists. Dermatol Surg. (2009) 35:965–72. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01164.x
18.
GambichlerTPluraISchmid-WendtnerMValavanisKKulichovaDStuckerMet al. High-definition optical coherence tomography of melanocytic skin lesions. J Biophotonics. (2015) 8:681–6. 10.1002/jbio.201400085
19.
KwonSYoonYKimBJangWHOhBChungKYet al. Dermoscopy guided dark-field multi-functional optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. (2017) 8:1372–81. 10.1364/BOE.8.001372
20.
DuboisALevecqOAzimaniHSiretDBarutASuppaMet al. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography for high-resolution noninvasive imaging of skin tumors. J Biomed Opt. (2018) 23:1–9. 10.1117/1.JBO.23.10.106007
21.
GambichlerTPluraIKampilafkosPValavanisKSandMBecharaFGet al. Histopathological correlates of basal cell carcinoma in the slice and en face imaging modes of high-definition optical coherence tomography. Br J Dermatol. (2014) 170:1358–61. 10.1111/bjd.12797
22.
UlrichMThemstrupLde CarvalhoNManfrediMGranaCCiardoSet al. Dynamic optical coherence tomography in dermatology. Dermatology. (2016) 232:298–311. 10.1159/000444706
23.
BooneMAMarneffeASuppaMMiyamotoMAlarconIHofmann-WellenhofRet al. High-definition optical coherence tomography algorithm for the discrimination of actinic keratosis from normal skin and from squamous cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2015) 29:1606–15. 10.1111/jdv.12954
24.
RajadhyakshaMGrossmanMEsterowitzDWebbRHAndersonRR. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: melanin provides strong contrast. J Invest Dermatol. (1995) 104:946–52. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12606215
25.
UlrichMLange-AsschenfeldtS. In vivo confocal microscopy in dermatology: from research to clinical application. J Biomed Opt. (2013) 18:061212. 10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.061212
26.
NewKPetrollWMBoydeAMartinLCorcuffPLevequeJet al. In vivo imaging of human teeth and skin using real-time confocal microscopy. J Scan Microsc. (1991) 13:369–72. 10.1002/sca.4950130507
27.
CoutyETognettiLLabeilleBDouchetCHabougitCCouzanCet al. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy combined with the ‘spaghetti technique' for the identification of surgical margins of lentigo maligna: experience in 70 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2018) 32:e366–8. 10.1111/jdv.14947
28.
FloresESCordovaMKoseKPhillipsWRossiANehalKet al. Intraoperative imaging during Mohs surgery with reflectance confocal microscopy: initial clinical experience. J Biomed Opt. (2015) 20:61103. 10.1117/1.JBO.20.6.061103
29.
CinottiEPerrotJLLabeilleBCambazardFRubegniP. Ex vivo confocal microscopy: an emerging technique in dermatology. Dermatol Pract Concept. (2018) 8:109–19. 10.5826/dpc.0802a08
30.
MuEWLewinJMStevensonMLMeehanSACarucciJAGareauDS. Use of digitally stained multimodal confocal mosaic images to screen for nonmelanoma skin cancer. JAMA Dermatol. (2016) 152:1335–41. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2997
31.
GonzalezSTannousZ. Real-time, in vivo confocal reflectance microscopy of basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2002) 47:869–74. 10.1067/mjd.2002.124690
32.
RishponAKimNScopeAPorgesLOlivieroMCBraunRPet al. Reflectance confocal microscopy criteria for squamous cell carcinomas and actinic keratoses. Arch Dermatol. (2009) 145:766–72. 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.134
33.
UlrichMKanitakisJGonzalezSLange-AsschenfeldtSStockflethERoewert-HuberJ. Evaluation of Bowen disease by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol. (2012) 166:451–3. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10563.x
34.
UlrichMKlempMDarvinMEKonigKLademannJMeinkeMC. In vivo detection of basal cell carcinoma: comparison of a reflectance confocal microscope and a multiphoton tomograph. J Biomed Opt. (2013) 18:61229. 10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.061229
35.
MurataTHondaTEgawaGKitohADainichiTOtsukaAet al. Three-dimensional evaluation of subclinical extension of extramammary Paget disease: visualization of the histological border and its comparison to the clinical border. Br J Dermatol. (2017) 177:229–37. 10.1111/bjd.15282
36.
TkaczykE. Innovations and developments in dermatologic non-invasive optical imaging and potential clinical applications. Acta Derm Venereol. (2017) 218:5–13. 10.2340/00015555-2717
37.
CinottiEGalluccioDTognettiLHabougitCManganoniAMVenturiniMet al. Nipple and areola lesions: review of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy features. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2019) 33:1837–46. 10.1111/jdv.15727
38.
GonzalezSSanchezVGonzalez-RodriguezAParradoCUllrichM. Confocal microscopy patterns in nonmelanoma skin cancer and clinical applications. Actas Dermosifiliogr. (2014) 105:446–58. 10.1016/j.adengl.2014.04.007
39.
BaluMZacharyCBHarrisRMKrasievaTBKonigKTrombergBJet al. In vivo multiphoton microscopy of basal cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. (2015) 151:1068–74. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0453
40.
PaoliJSmedhMWennbergAMEricsonMB. Multiphoton laser scanning microscopy on non-melanoma skin cancer: morphologic features for future non-invasive diagnostics. J Invest Dermatol. (2008) 128:1248–55. 10.1038/sj.jid.5701139
41.
KlempMMeinkeMCWeinigelMRowert-HuberHJKonigKUlrichMet al. Comparison of morphologic criteria for actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma using in vivo multiphoton tomography. Exp Dermatol. (2016) 25:218–22. 10.1111/exd.12912
42.
BaluMKellyKMZacharyCBHarrisRMKrasievaTBKonigKet al. Distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic nevi by in vivo multiphoton microscopy. Cancer Res. (2014) 74:2688–97. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2582
43.
ChangHJangWHLeeSKimBKimMJKimWOet al. Moxifloxacin labeling-based multiphoton microscopy of skin cancers in Asians. Lasers Surg Med. (2019). 10.1002/lsm.23138. [Epub ahead of print].
44.
ThomasGvan VoskuilenJGerritsenHCSterenborgHJ. Advances and challenges in label-free nonlinear optical imaging using two-photon excitation fluorescence and second harmonic generation for cancer research. J Photochem Photobiol B. (2014) 141:128–38. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.08.025
45.
Dela CruzJMMcMullenJDWilliamsRMZipfelWR. Feasibility of using multiphoton excited tissue autofluorescence for in vivo human histopathology. Biomed Opt Express. (2010) 1:1320–30. 10.1364/BOE.1.001320
46.
WangTJangWHLeeSYoonCJLeeJHKimBet al. Moxifloxacin: clinically compatible contrast agent for multiphoton imaging. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:27142. 10.1038/srep27142
Summary
Keywords
skin imaging, skin cancer, benign skin tumor, ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, confocal microscopy, two-photon microscopy
Citation
Oh BH, Kim KH and Chung KY (2019) Skin Imaging Using Ultrasound Imaging, Optical Coherence Tomography, Confocal Microscopy, and Two-Photon Microscopy in Cutaneous Oncology. Front. Med. 6:274. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00274
Received
08 July 2019
Accepted
11 November 2019
Published
22 November 2019
Volume
6 - 2019
Edited by
Yasuhiro Fujisawa, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Reviewed by
Hassanin Al-Aasam, Luebeck University of Applied Sciences, Germany; Ryota Tanaka, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Oh, Kim and Chung.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kee Yang Chung kychung@yuhs.ac
This article was submitted to Dermatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.