Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci., 15 June 2023
Sec. Marine Pollution
This article is part of the Research Topic Harmful Algal Blooms Under Global Changes: New Challenges and Mitigation Strategies View all 3 articles

Harmful algae diversity from a coastal upwelling system detected by high-throughput sequencing

  • 1Immunology and Genomics, Institute of Marine Research, Department of Biotecnology and Aquaculture, National Research Council (IIM-CSIC), Vigo, Spain
  • 2Harmful Microalgae and Plankton Ecology, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), Vigo, Spain
  • 3European Union Reference Laboratory for Monitoring of Marine Biotoxins, Vigo, Spain

Introduction: In recent years, environmental DNA (eDNA) amplicon sequencing has been used to unveil plankton diversity in the field. Nevertheless, molecular methods, such as this, are rarely used in harmful algal bloom (HAB) monitoring programs, which mainly rely on morphological identification by conventional light microscopy.

Methods: The present study focused on a shallow marine environment (Ría de Vigo, Northwest Spain), where sediment and plankton samples were collected from 2016 to 2018.

Results: The application of eDNA amplicon sequencing allowed us to simultaneously detect 25 potential harmful species (mainly diatoms and dinoflagellates) included in the IOC-UNESCO Taxonomic Reference List of Harmful Microalgae. Among these, causative agents of amnesic shellfish poisoning (Pseudo-nitzschia spp.) paralytic shellfish poisoning (Gymnodinium catenatum and Alexandrium minutum), azaspiracid producers (Azadinium poporum) and ichthyotoxic haptophytes (Chrysochromulina leadbeateri), were identified. Some toxic microalgae were better represented in sediment (e.g., Pseudo-nitzschia pungens, Gymnodinium catenatum) or planktonic fractions (e.g., Pseudo-nitzschia, Gymnodinium smaydae), confirming the importance of including both sediment and plankton fractions in eDNA monitoring studies. Despite the limitations of sequencing short amplicons, it was possible to discern in this study six Pseudo-nitzschia species and associate each of them with each seasonal peak produced in summer periods. Furthermore, several species previously unreported in Ría de Vigo (Pseudo-nitzschia turgidula, Chrysochromulina leadbeateri, Azadinium poporum) could be detected.

Discusion: These results point out the application of eDNA amplicon sequencing to expand our knowledge about harmful species in HAB monitoring programs and early warning systems for low abundant and rare taxa.

1 Introduction

Photosynthetic organisms (e.g., microalgae and cyanobacteria) that inhabit benthic and planktonic marine ecosystems are essential constituents of food webs. Under certain environmental conditions, due to natural and/or anthropogenic-induced changes, their uncontrolled growth turns in some cases into harmful algal blooms (HABs), which can be deleterious for the aquatic ecosystems and cause severe economic impacts in the aquaculture industry (Berdalet et al., 2015; Grattan et al., 2016; Gobler, 2020; Wells et al., 2020; Hallegraeff et al., 2021). In recent decades, several factors, such as the expansion of human activities in coastal ecosystems, the implementation of monitoring systems, and the consequences of environmental changes (eutrophication, marine transport, global warming), could explain the apparent worldwide increase in the number, frequency, and intensity of HABs (Hallegraeff, 2004; Anderson et al., 2012; Grattan et al., 2016; Hallegraeff et al., 2021).

Almost 300 phytoplankton species have been listed as harmful (Lundholm et al., 2009, onward), and approximately 80 are known to produce toxins (Hallegraeff, 2004; Berdalet et al., 2015). Often, HABs are associated with toxin-producing species that can lead to the accumulation of these compounds in aquatic organisms, typically filter-feeding molluscs. Nonetheless, marine biotoxins can affect aquatic organisms from invertebrates to fish, mammals and seabirds, and their accumulation in the food web represents a potential risk for public health through the consumption of contaminated shellfish and fishery products (Glibert et al., 2014; Bresnan et al., 2021). Otherwise, HABs can lead to oxygen depletion in the water column during the decline of their populations, or cause physical damage (mechanical injury/irritation) to fish gills (Anderson et al., 2012).

Episodes of HABs are among the most critical environmental factors affecting the Galician shellfish industry due to the closure of harvesting installations (Rodríguez et al., 2010), risking the loss of 118 M€ (production value in 2016; Avdelas et al., 2021). In Galicia, the development and effects of toxic algal blooms remained unnoticed until 1976, when a paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) episode developed in the Rías Baixas, hindering mussel aquaculture. Approximately 170 people were affected in Spain and several European countries due to the consumption of contaminated mussels (Trainer et al., 2010). In 1981, over 5000 consumers in Spain were affected by diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) associated with blooms of Dinophysis sp. (Reguera et al., 2008; Trainer et al., 2010). Monitoring for the presence of toxins in shellfish by bioassay was officially adopted, and the scarce phytoplankton surveys that were initiated in the 1950s increased in frequency and focused on potentially toxic species. The relevance of the aquaculture sector pushed efforts toward the development of an intensive monitoring system for biotoxins, phytoplankton and oceanographic conditions. Moreover, the European Reference Laboratory for Marine Biotoxins (EURLMB) has also been based in the Vigo region since 1993.

Most national HAB monitoring systems carry out regular samplings at fixed stations and cell counts of potentially toxic genera/species under an optical microscope using standard procedures (Anderson, 2009). However, this technique is time-consuming and requires highly trained staff with taxonomical skills to analyze and report the results (Karlson et al., 2010). In recent years, the advent of new technologies, such as autonomous imaging flow cytometry (IFC) (Dashkova et al., 2017), robotic platforms (drones, autonomous surface vehicles) (Wu et al., 2019), satellites (Palenzuela et al., 2020; Detoni et al., 2023) and molecular methods (e.g., qPCR, in situ hybridization) (Ebenezer et al., 2012; Zamor et al., 2012; Medlin and Orozco, 2017), have provided multidisciplinary approaches to collect information about harmful phytoplankton species and population dynamics, which are valuable for monitoring systems.

Although molecular technologies are widely and routinely applied in research, their transfer to laboratories concerned with monitoring requires a change in paradigm and the choice of suitable methods (i.e., allowing multiple detection of target organisms, providing quantitative results useful for early warning and risk assessment, etc.; FAO et al., 2023). Among the several techniques currently available, high-throughput sequencing constitutes an interesting and valuable approach. DNA metabarcoding, based on massive sequencing of eDNA, gives higher taxonomic coverage, allowing the identification of thousands of species in a single sample (Deiner et al., 2017). This methodology has been successfully used for unveiling unknown plankton diversity (Stoeck et al., 2010; de Vargas et al., 2015), detecting novel genera/species (Dzhembekova et al., 2017; Sze et al., 2018), and determining the composition and dynamics of co-occurring species in microalgal blooms (Buchan et al., 2014; Needham and Fuhrman, 2016; Zhou et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2020).

In this study, we report the results of metabarcoding targeting the 18S V9 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene region, with a special focus on harmful algae. Data collected in the Ría de Vigo (Northwest Spain), in a production area of bivalve mollusks during a three-year period were used to detect toxic HAB species in surface water and surface sediment samples. This area is highly influenced by the wind-driven upwelling and downwelling events, inducing seasonal changes in the diversity of organisms (Rosón et al., 2002; Arístegui et al., 2009). The results allowed to gather new information in the area about dominant and rare phytoplankton including toxic bloom forming taxa. This approach, if conducted regularly within the monitoring system, would allow to track seasonal changes in the planktonic communities, providing an early warning of potentially harmful species overlooked by conventional microscopical techniques.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Sampling

Harmful phytoplankton communities in sediment and surface water were evaluated in sediment and plankton samples from Meira, a bivalve production area in the Ría de Vigo, Northwest Spain (42°17´6.72´´ N/8°43´18.80´´ W) (Figure 1A). Samples were collected every three months from July 2016 to June 2018. Surface sediment was collected from three different areas of the intertidal zone (distance of 5 m among sampling points) and then mixed. Seawater was collected at approximately 10 meters from the seashore, and successively filtered through several pore sizes to obtain different planktonic fractions according to Sieburth et al. (1978). For this purpose, 75 m3 of seawater was filtered through a 200-µm plankton net to obtain the mesoplankton fraction. Subsequently, a volume of 40 L was filtered again through a 65-µm pore size polycarbonate filter to obtain the microplankton fraction. Finally, 2 L of seawater were filtered using a 0.22-µm pore size polycarbonate filter to obtain the nanoplankton–picoplankton fraction (Figure 1B). All samples were kept at -20°C until DNA extraction. A total of 28 samples of sediment and water fractions were processed.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 (A) Location of the sampling area in Ría of Vigo (Meira, NW Spain). (B) Summary of the general methodology applied in this study. Superficial sediment was collected from the intertidal and seawater was collected at approximately 10 meters from the seashore, and it was successively filtered by different pore sizes to obtain the mesoplankton, microplankton and nanoplankton fraction. The DNA metabarcoding procedure was performed according to Ríos-Castro et al., 2021 to obtain the eukaryote OTU table. This study was focused in the microalgae community, particularly in the study of harmful microalgae.

2.2 Environmental parameters

Environmental factors from the V2 station (Moaña), close to the sampling site, were obtained from Instituto Tecnolóxico para o Control do Medio Mariño de Galicia (INTECMAR, 2010), and upwelling indices were retrieved from the IEO-CSIC (http://www.indicedeafloramiento.ieo.es/interactivo.html). Abiotic factors included water temperature (°C), salinity (ppm), oxygen (ml L-1), chlorophyll estimated by fluorescence (mg m-3), air temperature (°C) and precipitation (L m-2).

2.3 Metabarcoding assay and data analysis

The metabarcoding assay of eukaryotic communities was performed as detailed in Ríos-Castro et al. (2021). This methodology included DNA isolation, amplicon sequencing of the V9 region of the 18S rRNA gene, sequence analysis using bioinformatic tools (Microbial Genomics Module, CLC) to obtain the eukaryotic OTU (Operational Taxonomic Unit) table and OTU table subsampling (R, vegan package) to the sample with the lowest number of reads (46,012 reads). The subsampled eukaryotic OTU table was used for downstream analysis performed in the present study, which focused on the detection and monitoring of harmful microalgae. For this purpose, we compared the list of eukaryotic OTUs associated with phytoplankton species against the IOC-UNESCO Taxonomic Reference List of Harmful Microalgae (Lundholm et al., 2009, onward, https://www.marinespecies.org/hab/). OTUs associated with the classes Bacillariophyceae, Dinophyceae, Dictyochophyceae, Haptophyceae, Pelagophyceae and Raphidophyceae were used for further analysis since harmful algal species in the IOC-UNESCO list belong to these taxonomic groups.

To decrease the number of nonrepresentative taxa, OTUs with a combined abundance in all samples ≤ 5 were excluded from the analysis. The total number of reads and OTUs from each class was represented as well as the number of reads obtained for each class in each sediment and plankton sample. The community composition of microalgae was represented as relative abundances according to the following criteria. Overall, all genera representing >1% of the total reads were represented. When the sum of the relative abundance of all OTUs within a genus was between 0.5% and 1%, these OTUs were classified at the class level. Finally, genera with abundances lower than 0.5% were grouped as “other” because of their low representativeness in the microalgae composition. The top 20 most abundant OTUs from the classes Bacillariophyceae and Dinophyceae were also represented in sediment and plankton compartments. Microalgal OTUs considered by the IOC-UNESCO as harmful algae were selected for further analyses. To avoid the inclusion of OTUs with ambiguous identity, representative sequences of all OTUs associated with the toxic HAB species were also verified with BLASTn, and only OTUs with 100% similarity with the associated single species were considered.

3 Results

3.1 Environmental parameters

Abiotic parameters are represented in Supplementary Table 1. Seawater temperature followed the same patterns as air temperature, except for July 2016, when the air temperature was 6°C higher than the water temperature. The low water temperature recorded in July 2016 coincided with the highest upwelling index recorded in comparison with other summer periods. The highest precipitation values were recorded in February 2018 and June 2018. The lowest fluorescence values were observed in winter, especially in February 2018, which coincided with the lowest dissolved organic carbon (DOC) value. The lowest dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was obtained in summer, and maximum values occurred in winter, mainly in February 2018. The highest level of DOC was observed in September 2017.

3.2 Sequencing results and microalgae communities

The eukaryotic sequencing results were detailed in Ríos-Castro et al. (2021). After the eukaryotic OTU table subsampling procedure was performed in the present study, 6,819 eukaryotic OTUs were obtained. After filtering the main microalgal classes that may include harmful species, 444 microalgal OTUs were retained, representing 18.73% of the total eukaryotes in the sediment and 26.28% of the total eukaryotes in the plankton (Supplementary Figure 1). In terms of OTU number, the most diverse microalgae were Dinophyceae (259 OTUs) and Bacillariophyceae (146 OTUs), followed by minor contributions from Haptophyceae (24 OTUs), Dictyochophyceae (7 OTUs), Raphidophyceae (4 OTUs) and Pelagophyceae (4 OTUs) (Figure 2A). Dinophyceae and Bacillariophyceae represented 6% (66,348 reads) and 5.6% (61,654 reads) of the total eukaryotic reads (Figure 2B) after removing those OTUs with a total abundance lower than 5 reads.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Number of OTUs (A) and reads (B) of microalgae algae classes included in the taxonomic reference list of harmful microalgae algae IOC-UNESCO). The number of reads of each taxonomic group were represented on each sediment and plankton sampling.

In sediment, the class Bacillariophyceae was the most represented, especially in the samples from January 2017 (11,656 total eukaryotic reads) and June 2017 (10,881 total eukaryotic reads) (Figure 3A). Benthic diatoms of the genera Navicula (27% of total microalgal reads) and Amphora (12% of total microalgal reads) dominated the microalgae composition in sediment, with some OTUs of Navicula phyllepta, Navicula arenaria and Amphora laevis ranked in the top 20 most abundant OTUs of their class (Supplementary Figure 2). Other minority reads from Bacillariophyceae belonged to the genera Craticula, Berkeleya, Cymbella, Sellaphora and Pseudo-nitzschia (Figure 3B). The genera Amphidinium (3.14%), and Proterythropsis (2.22%), both from Dinophyceae, were also detected in sediment (Figure 3B). In general, seasonal variability in the microalgal community was not clearly observed among the different sediment samplings (Figure 3B). However, in the October 2016 sampling, OTUs from the class Dinophyceae represented almost 37% of the total microalgae, with the genus Amphidinium reaching 16.37% of total reads (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Relative abundance of each microalgae class (A) and genera (B) found in sediment. Relative abundance of each microalgae class (C) and genera (D) found in plankton. Relative abundance was calculated respect the total of microalgae selected in this study. B, Bacillariophyceae; D, Dinophyceae.

Conversely, Dinophyceae was the most representative class in the planktonic fractions, with 24,137 total eukaryotic reads in September 2017 (Figure 3C). The most representative genera were Oxyrrhis, Amphidinium, Alexandrium and Parvodinium, which accounted for 29%, 5.96%, 2.69% and 1.5% of the total microalgal reads, respectively. Other classes like the Haptophyceae and Dictyochophyceae, with Chrysochromulina sp. and Pteridomonas sp., were also well represented in the plankton (Figure 3D). The microalgal community composition was highly variable, and the massive proliferation of certain organisms was occasionally detected, such as Oxyrrhis marina, which reached 84% of total microalgal reads, among the top 20 OTUs with the highest abundance in the Dinophyceae (Figure 3D; Supplementary Figure 2).

3.3 Harmful algal communities

A total of 26 species listed as harmful algae according to the IOC-UNESCO list were detected in the marine environment (Figure 4). Within the Bacillariophyceae, the main genus detected was Pseudo-nitzschia, whereas Gymnodinium and Azadinium were the dominant genera in the class Dinophyceae. Minor harmful taxa such as Amphidinium carterae, Dinophysis sp., Alexandrium minutum and Karenia mikimotoi were also detected. The descriptions of harmful microalgae detected within the classes Bacillariophyceae and Dinophyceae are detailed below.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Total reads of potential harmful microalgae species found according the Taxonomic reference lis of harmful microalgae (IOC-UESCO).

3.3.1 Bacillariophyceae

The most abundant potentially harmful algae detected was the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae). It appeared in all samplings both in sediment and planktonic fractions. Despite the highest contribution of Bacillariophyceae in sediment, Pseudo-nitzschia was especially dominant in water samples. The highest number of reads obtained for this genus corresponded with summer months and coincided with the peaks in temperature and upwelling index. Moreover, their total number of reads decreased from summer to winter samplings during the studied period. Therefore, a seasonal pattern of Pseudo-nitzschia sp. could be detected (Figure 5A). Several species were identified and confirmed with 100% similarity in BLASTn: P. pungens, P. fraudulenta, P. delicatissima, P. australis, P. heimii and Pseudo-nitzschia sp.* (100% BLASTn similarity with P. turgidula, P. cuspidata and P. lineola). All Pseudo-nitzschia spp. were associated with planktonic samples, with the exception of P. pungens, which was mostly recorded in sediment samples (Figure 5B). Furthermore, each summer peak in Pseudo-nitzschia could be associated with a dominant species among other secondary ones (Figure 5B). For example, P. australis and P. delicatissima dominated in the peak of July 2016, while P. pungens was dominant in summer 2017, and Pseudo-nitzschia sp.* (P. turgidula, P. cuspidata or P. lineola) in summer 2018.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 (A) Total reads of Pseudo-nitzschia sp in sediment and plankton. (B) Number of reads of different species of Pseudo-nitzchia found on each sediment and plankton sampling. The taxonomic identities of harmful microalgae obtained after eukaryote sequencing have been confirmed with a BLASTn with a similarity of 100%. The BLASTn classified Pseudo-nitzschia sp* as P. turgidula, P. cuspidata or P. lineola with the same percentage of similarity (100%) and e-value (2e-60).

3.3.2 Dinophyceae

Potentially harmful microalgae belonging to the genera Amphidinium, Gymnodinium and Azadinium were detected in both sediment and planktonic samples (Figure 6). Amphidinium sp. was present in sediment samples without a clear seasonal abundance pattern associated with environmental factors (temperature and upwelling index). However, a massive proliferation of this genus occurred in October 2016 in comparison with other samplings (Figure 6A). The species Amphidinium cupulatisquama, A. massartii, A. steinii, A. carterae and A. operculatum were detected, with A. steinii being the main species responsible for the abundance peak in October 2016 in sediment. Although almost all species of Amphidinium prevailed in sediment, A. carterae was better represented in plankton in June 2018. Furthermore, A. operculatum was exclusively detected in plankton in September 2017. Other OTUs similar to Amphidinium sp. but not confirmed at 100% similarity after BLASTn analysis were also detected (Supplementary Table 2).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Total reads of harmful Dinophyceae in total sediment and plankton and in each sediment and plankton sampling in: (A, B) Amphidinium sp., (C, D) Gymnodinium sp. and (E, F) Azadinium sp. S, sediment; P, plankton.

Gymnodinium sp. was detected in the sediment and water column in all sampling periods without a clear seasonal abundance pattern (Figure 6C). The highest number of reads was obtained in June 2018, mainly associated with the species Gymnodinium smaydae in the water column, followed by the abundance of G. catenatum in sediment in July 2016 (Figure 6D). Although five Gymnodinium species were detected, G. catenatum and G. smaydae prevailed, and they were associated with sediment and plankton fractions, respectively. Gymnodinium dorsalisulcum was mainly represented in planktonic samples from September 2017 and February 2018, and minority species such as G. impudicum and G. aureolum were also found in planktonic samples.

Azadinium sp. was mainly recorded in sediment, with an abundance peak associated with A. poporum. Azadinium trinitatum was also detected, but with low representativeness and exclusively in sediment (Figures 6E, F).

4 Discussion

The impact of HABs in coastal ecosystems includes marine organisms, human activities (aquaculture, fisheries, and tourism) and public health issues (Grattan et al., 2016; Gallardo-Rodríguez et al., 2019). HAB records have globally increased in recent decades, mostly associated with environmental changes and the expansion of human activities and parallel pressure in these areas (Davidson et al., 2014; Gobler, 2020; Hallegraeff et al., 2021). Thus, several strategies for their mitigation, prevention and control in coastal waters have been assessed thus far (e.g., Anderson, 2009; Anderson et al., 2012).

Despite this, the advent of new technologies in recent decades for the molecular identification of taxa (or genes associated with toxin production) have rarely been incorporated into routine monitoring programs (e.g., McGirr et al., 2022). Among the several techniques proposed for qualitative or semiquantitative detection of toxin-producing species, eDNA sequencing appears to be useful for the description of marine diversity, including harmful microalgae (Hii et al., 2021; Jacobs-Palmer et al., 2021) of interest in surveillance and monitoring programs.

To explore the possibilities of this approach, the Galician rias are particularly appropriate due to the intense aquaculture and fishery activities, exposed to the recurrent development of HABs and highly influenced by upwelling and downwelling events (Álvarez-Salgado et al., 2008; Díaz et al., 2014; Broullón et al., 2020). Marine biotoxins produced during these events cause periodical harvesting closures during the year. Thus, improving our knowledge of oceanographic conditions and toxic phytoplankton species can provide critical information for monitoring systems, stakeholders, and management purposes.

In the present study, the application of eDNA amplicon sequencing allowed us to simultaneously detect 25 potential harmful species from several algal groups included in the IOC-UNESCO Taxonomic Reference List of Harmful Microalgae (Lundholm et al., 2009, onward) in both sediment and water samples and in different seasons over a two-year period.

The most abundant harmful species (in terms of a higher number of reads) belonged to the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae). Diatoms from this genus are well documented in the Galician rias (Fraga et al., 1998), including species associated with the production of domoic acid (DA), the causative agent of amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP); (Trainer et al., 2010)). The accumulation of this toxin in seafood causes severe economic impacts in the aquaculture sector and human health (Reguera et al., 2008). Despite in Galician rías P. australis is known as the main causative agent of DA production, the results from DNA metabarcoding allowed us to identify multiple Pseudo-nitzschia species related to DA production in other areas (Díaz et al., 2014; Bates et al., 2018; Broullón et al., 2020). The species P. australis, P. delicatissima, P. fraudulenta and P. pungens have been detected before in the Galician rias (Fraga et al., 1998; Trainer et al., 2010; Zapata et al., 2011; Díaz et al., 2014; Palenzuela et al., 2020). We also detected a sequence that could be associated with P. turgidula, P. lineola or P. cuspidata, as we obtained the similarity percentage, coverage, and e-values with all these species. The first two species have not been detected previously in Spain (Bates et al., 2018); however, P. cuspidata was previously detected on the Atlantic coasts of Spain and Portugal (Fraga et al., 1998; Churro et al., 2009). Although maritime transport could influence the geographical expansion of these species, additional studies should be performed to confirm the presence of new species in the Ría de Vigo.

The analysis of both sediment and planktonic fractions allowed us to reveal differences in species distribution within the same genera between environmental compartments. For example, P. pungens was more associated with sediment samples, whereas the other Pseudo-nitzschia species recorded were mainly present in water samples. This could be explained by the vertical flux and flocculation or presence of resistant forms in sediment, as previously described in Pseudo-nitzschia (Dortch et al., 1997; Parsons and Dortch, 2002; Trainer et al., 2010).

One of the main benefits of HTS-based methods is the possibility of easily monitoring changes in a community across different seasons over a period (Gilbert et al., 2012; Hernández-Ruiz et al., 2018; Ríos-Castro et al., 2021). Ría de Vigo is highly influenced by the wind-driven upwelling and downwelling events, inducing seasonal changes in the diversity of organisms (Rosón et al., 2002; Arístegui et al., 2009). In upwelling events, nutrient fertilization associated with the northerly winds and the increment of solar irradiation results in a high primary production, which is jeopardized due to the massive proliferation of toxin producing HABs such as, Dinophysis acuminata, Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and Alexandrium minutum (Figueiras and Ríos, 1993; Broullón et al., 2020). In contrast, Gymnodinium catenatum blooms occurs in downwelling events (Broullón et al., 2020). In this study, a seasonal pattern highly related with upwelling events was only clearly observed in Pseudo-nitzschia spp. This genus was always detected in sediment and plankton, with abundance peaks associated with summer periods from 2016 to 2018. These results agree with previous associations of its blooms with upwelling periods in late spring–summer (Figueiras and Ríos, 1993; Trainer et al., 2010; Trainer et al., 2012; Broullón et al., 2020). Furthermore, each peak in abundance of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. detected in summer months could be attributed to different species: P. delicatissima in summer 2016, P. pungens in summer 2017, and P. turgidula/P. cuspidata/P. lineola in summer 2018. In the Ría de Vigo, two Pseudo-nitzschia bloom events, from June–July 2016 and from August 2018–October 2018, were included in the Harmful Algae Events Database (IOC-UNESCO, HAEDAT, http://haedat.iode.org), corresponding with our sampling periods. However, they could not be identified at the species level using traditional light microscopy. It is known that Pseudo-nitzschia species can be distinguished by genetic means, but they are often morphologically identical (cryptic species), or only a few morphological differences can be found after a detailed examination (pseudocryptic species) (Trainer et al., 2012). The specific results obtained with the application of molecular methods in this study indicated that P. delicatissima and P. australis could be the main species involved in the bloom recorded in summer 2016, whereas three possible species (P. turgidula/P. cuspidata/P. lineola) could be involved in the peak in summer 2018. Although we detected an abundance peak of P. pungens in summer 2017, this possible HAB event was not recorded in the HAEDAT database. As we mentioned above, this genus was mainly detected in sediments, and given that phytoplankton monitoring is only performed in the water column, it is likely that this episode was not detected in water samples during that period.

The eDNA metabarcoding allowed the detection of harmful dinoflagellates well known to occur in the Ría de Vigo, such as G. catenatum and A. minutum, the main toxin producers associated with paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) in the Northwest Iberian Peninsula. In these cases, information on their temporal trends was obtained during the study. Gymnodinium catenatum blooms usually occurred in winter periods (Fraga et al., 1993; Figueroa et al., 2008), and they were present in HAEDAT records in February–March 2017 and September 2017. However, it was not possible to associate those records with our data. One interesting finding was the high abundance of G. catenatum obtained in sediment samples in comparison with planktonic fractions, which could suggest the presence of resting cysts (Figueroa et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2020). Alexandrium minutum was detected but in general with very low abundance, despite a proliferation that caused an exceptional red tide recorded in June–July 2018 in the Ría de Vigo (Ben-Gigirey et al., 2020; Nogueira et al., 2022). In addition, this study provided the first records of azaspiracid (AZA) producers, such as the Amphidomataceae genus Azadinium (A. poporum), in the Northwest Iberian Peninsula. These toxins have been detected in minor amounts by INTECMAR weekly monitoring analyses and should be surveyed in the near future. These emergent toxins constitute a potential risk given the harvesting closures they cause in shellfish aquaculture areas in other European countries such as Ireland. Furthermore, these small dinoflagellates cannot be identified by optical microscopy to the species level. In fact, in 2018, the Marine Institute (Galway, Ireland) validated and accredited for the first time the method for A. spinosum detection by qPCR in a routine monitoring program (Wietkamp et al., 2020).

In the context of the present study, where some potentially harmful taxa were recorded for the first time, it worths to be mentioned the absence of some benthic dinoflagellates from warmer waters, such as the genera Gambierdiscus and Ostreopsis, the latter in apparent expansion in neighboring areas of the Iberian Peninsula (Drouet et al., 2021), as well as the low number of reads (21 reads) of Dinophysis acuminata, the main producer of diarrhetic shellfish toxins (DSTs) in this area (Velasco-Senovilla et al., 2023).

Finally, one of the haptophytes detected in this study with a representative number of reads, Chrysocromulina leadbeateri, deserves also particular mention as it has been responsible for large fish kills in Norway due to its ichthyotoxicity (John et al., 2022). Even if such fish mortalities have seldom been reported in the area, the presence of potentially ichthyotoxic haptophytes and raphidophytes, such as those reported in this work, would represent another target organism readily detected by HTS analyses.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of metabarcoding methodology based on the sequencing of the V9 region of the 18S rRNA gene has provided valuable and new information on the composition of harmful microalgae which can directly affect marine fauna and human health. Despite the recent interest in including sediment in metabarcoding studies (Forster et al., 2016; Holman et al., 2019; Ríos-Castro et al., 2021), few studies targeted their respective communities in shallow-water habitats. In fact, this approach revealed the presence of distinct harmful microalgae representative in sediment (e.g., P. pungens, G. catenatum) and/or planktonic fractions (e.g., P. delicatissima, G. smaydae), highlighting the importance of including sediment in eDNA monitoring studies. Furthermore, despite the limited taxonomical resolution inherent to short amplicons, it was feasible to characterize species of particular genera, such as Pseudo-nitzschia, and even species previously unreported in the area (P. turgidula). Moreover, each summer abundance peak could be associated with particular Pseudo-nitzschia species. This suggests the importance of including eDNA metabarcoding as an integrative and systematic monitoring tool for harmful algae and other organisms of interest. This molecular approach can complement morphology-based analysis, which usually lacks resolution at species level due to subtle morphological differences and/or the size of some harmful organisms, previously overlooked by conventional methods which rely on time-consuming analysis by highly trained staff with taxonomic expertise.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material. The dataset generated for this study can be found in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra. Under the accession number PRJNA761019.

Author contributions

RR-C: Methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation writing-original draft, and visualization. BN: Conceptualization, resources, methodology, writing-review & editing, supervision, and funding acquisition. JH-U: Writing-review & editing, supervision, FR: Writing-review & editing, supervision, AF: Conceptualization, resources, methodology, formal analysis, writing-review & editing, supervision, and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER, Interreg España – Portugal (POCTEP) 2014-[20200474_BLUEBIOLAB], VIVALDI [678589] (EU H2020), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain [CTM2017-83362-R] and Consellería de Economía, Emprego e Industria–GAIN, Xunta de Galicia [IN607B 2022/13].

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Raquel Aranguren and Begoña Villaverde for their help with sampling.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1200135/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

HABs, Harmful Algal Blooms; eDNA, Environmental DNA; PSP, paralytic shellfish poisoning; DSP, diarrhetic shellfish poisoning; EURLMB, European Reference Laboratory for Marine Biotoxins; qPCR, quantitative PCR; OTU, Operational Taxonomic Unit; AZA, azaspiracid.

References

Álvarez-Salgado X. A., Labarta U., Fernández-Reiriz M. J., Figueiras F. G., Rosón G., Piedracoba S., et al. (2008). Renewal time and the impact of harmful algal blooms on the extensive mussel raft culture of the Iberian coastal upwelling system (SW Europe). Harm. Algae 7 (6), 849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2008.04.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson D. M. (2009). Approaches to monitoring, control and management of harmful algal blooms (HABs). Ocean Coast. Manage. 52 (7), 342. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.04.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson D. M., Cembella A. D., Hallegraeff G. M. (2012). Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 143–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081121

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arístegui J., Barton E. D., Alvarez-Salgado X. A., Santos A. M. P., Figueiras F. G., Kifani S., et al. (2009). Sub-Regional ecosystem variability in the canary current upwelling. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Avdelas L., Avdic-Mravlje E., Marques A. C., Cano S., Capelle J. J., Carvalho N., et al. (2021). The decline of mussel aquaculture in the European union: causes, economic impacts and opportunities. Rev. Aquacult. 13 (1), 91–118. doi: 10.1111/raq.12465

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bates S. S., Hubbard K. A., Lundholm N., Montresor M., Leaw C. P. (2018). Pseudo-nitzschia, Nitzschia, and domoic acid: new research since 2011. Harm. Algae 79, 3–43. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2018.06.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ben-Gigirey B., Rossignoli A. E., Riobó P., Rodríguez F. (2020). First report of paralytic shellfish toxins in marine invertebrates and fish in Spain. Toxins 12 (11), 723. doi: 10.3390/toxins12110723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berdalet E., Fleming L. E., Gowen R., Davidson K., Hess P., Backer L. C., et al. (2015). Marine harmful algal blooms, human health and wellbeing: challenges and opportunities in the 21st century. journal of the marine biological association of the united kingdom. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 2015, 10.1017/S0025315415001733. doi: 10.1017/S0025315415001733

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bresnan E., Arévalo F., Belin C., Branco M. A. C., Cembella A. D., Clarke D., et al. (2021). Diversity and regional distribution of harmful algal events along the Atlantic margin of Europe. Harm. algae 102, 101976. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2021.101976

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Broullón E., López-Mozos M., Reguera B., Chouciño P., Doval M. D., Fernández-Castro B., et al. (2020). Thin layers of phytoplankton and harmful algae events in a coastal upwelling system. Prog. Oceanogr. 189, 102449. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102449

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchan A., LeCleir G. R., Gulvik C. A., González J. M. (2014). Master recyclers: features and functions of bacteria associated with phytoplankton blooms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12 (10), 686–698. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Churro C. I., Carreira C. C., Rodrigues F. J., Craveiro S. C., Calado A. J., Casteleyn G., et al. (2009). Diversity and abundance of potentially toxic Pseudo-nitzschia peragallo in aveiro coastal lagoon, Portugal and description of a new variety, P. pungens var. aveirensis var. nov. Diatom Res. 24, 35–62. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2009.9705782

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dashkova V., Malashenkov D., Poulton N., Vorobjev I., Barteneva N. S. (2017). Imaging flow cytometry for phytoplankton analysis. Methods (San Diego Calif.) 112, 188–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.05.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davidson K., Gowen R. J., Harrison P. J., Fleming L. E., Hoagland P., Moschonas G. (2014). Anthropogenic nutrients and harmful algae in coastal waters. J. Environ. Manage. 146, 206–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deiner K., Bik H. M., Mächler E., Seymour M., Lacoursière-Roussel A., Altermatt F., et al. (2017). Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol. Ecol. 26 (21), 5872–5895. doi: 10.1111/mec.14350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Detoni A. M. S., Navarro G., Garrido J. L., Rodríguez F., Hernández-Urcera J., Caballero I. (2023). Mapping dinoflagellate blooms (Noctiluca and Alexandrium) in aquaculture production areas in the NW Iberian peninsula with the sentinel-2/3 satellites. Sci. Total Environ. 868, 161579. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Vargas C., Audic S., Henry N., Decelle J., Mahé F., Logares R., et al. (2015). Ocean plankton. eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Sci. (New York N.Y.) 348 (6237), 1261605. doi: 10.1126/science.1261605

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Díaz P. A., Ruiz-Villarreal M., Velo-Suárez L., Ramilo I., Gentien P., Lunven M., et al. (2014). Tidal and wind-event variability and the distribution of two groups of Pseudo-nitzschia species in an upwelling-influenced ría. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr. 101, 163–179. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.09.043

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dortch Q., Robichaux R., Pool S., Milsted D., Mire G., Rabalais N., et al. (1997). Abundance and vertical flux of Pseudo-nitzschia in the northern gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 146, 249–264. doi: 10.3354/meps146249

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drouet K., Jauzein C., Herviot-Heath D., Hariri S., Laza-Martinez A., Lecadet C., et al. (2021). Current distribution and potential expansion of the harmful benthic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. siamensis towards the warming waters of the bay of Biscay, north-East Atlantic. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 4956–4979. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dzhembekova N., Urusizaki S., Moncheva S., Ivanova P., Nagai S. (2017). Applicability of massively parallel sequencing on monitoring harmful algae at varna bay in the black Sea. Harm. Algae 68, 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebenezer V., Medlin L. K., Ki J. S. (2012). Molecular detection, quantification, and diversity evaluation of microalgae. Mar. Biotechnol. (New York N.Y.) 14 (2), 129–142. doi: 10.1007/s10126-011-9427-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO, IOC, IAEA (2023). Joint FAO-IOC-IAEA technical guidance for the implementation of early warning systems for harmful algal blooms. Fish. Aquacult. Tech. Paper, No. 690. (Rome: FAO) 35(2), 252–257. doi: 10.4060/cc4794en

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Figueiras F. G., Ríos A. F. (1993). “Phytoplankton succession, red tides and the hydrographic regime in the rías bajas of Galicia,” in Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the Sea. Eds. Smayda T. J., Shimizu Y. (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers), 239–244.

Google Scholar

Figueroa R. I., Bravo I., Ramilo I., Pazos Y., Moroño Á. (2008). New life-cycle stages of Gymnodinium catenatum (Dinophyceae): laboratory and field observations. Aquat. Microbial. Ecol. 52, 13–23. doi: 10.3354/ame01206

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Forster D., Dunthorn M., Mahé F., Dolan J. R., Audic S., Bass D., et al. (2016). Benthic protists: the under-charted majority. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92 (8), fiw120. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fraga S., Alverez M. J., Míguez Á., Fernández M. L., Costas E., López-Rodas V. (1998). “Pseudo-nitzschia species isolated from Galician waters: toxicity, DNA content and lectin binding assay,” in Harmful algae. Eds. Reguera B., Blanco J., Fernández M. L., Wyatt T. (Paris: Xunta de Galicia and the IOC of UNESCO), 270–273.

Google Scholar

Fraga S., Bakun A. (1993). Global climate change and harmful algal blooms: the example of Gymnodinium catenatum on the Galician coast. In: Smayda T. J., Shimizu Y. (eds) Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp 59–65.

Google Scholar

Gallardo-Rodríguez J. J., Astuya-Villalón A., Llanos-Rivera A., Avello-Fontalba V., Ulloa-Jofré V. (2019). A critical review on control methods for harmful algal blooms. Rev. Aquacult. 11 (3), 661–684. doi: 10.1111/raq.12251

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbert J. A., Steele J. A., Caporaso J. G., Steinbrück L., Reeder J., Temperton B., et al. (2012). Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. ISME J. 6 (2), 298–308. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glibert P. M., Icarus Allen J., Artioli Y., Beusen A., Bouwman L., Harle J., et al. (2014). Vulnerability of coastal ecosystems to changes in harmful algal bloom distribution in response to climate change: projections based on model analysis. Global Change Biol. 20 (12), 3845–3858. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12662

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gobler C. J. (2020). Climate change and harmful algal blooms: insights and perspective. Harm. algae 91, 101731. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101731

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grattan L. M., Holobaugh S., Morris J. G. Jr. (2016). Harmful algal blooms and public health. Harm. algae 57 (B), 2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2016.05.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hallegraeff G. M. (2004). “Harmful algal blooms: a global overview,” in Manual of harmful marine microalgae. Eds. Hallegraeff G. M., Anderson D. M., Cembella A. D. (Paris, France: Unesco).

Google Scholar

Hallegraeff G. M., Aligizaki K., Amzil Z., Andersen P., Anderson D. M., Arneborg L. (2021). Global HAB status report. a scientific summary for policy makers. Eds. Hallegraeff G. M., Enevoldsen H., Zingone A. (Paris: UNESCO), 1399.

Google Scholar

Hernández-Ruiz M., Barber-Lluch E., Prieto A., Álvarez-Salgado X. A., Logares R., Teira E. (2018). Seasonal succession of small planktonic eukaryotes inhabiting surface waters of a coastal upwelling system. Environ. Microbiol. 20 (8), 2955–2973. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hii K. S., Mohd-Din M., Luo Z., Tan S. N., Lim Z. F., Lee L. K., et al. (2021). Diverse harmful microalgal community assemblages in the johor strait and the environmental effects on its community dynamics. Harm. algae 107, 102077. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2021.102077

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holman L. E., de Bruyn M., Creer S., Carvalho G., Robidart J., Rius M. (2019). Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 11559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47899-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou F., Zhang H., Xie W., Zhou X., Zhu X., Zhang D. (2020). Co-Occurrence patterns and assembly processes of microeukaryotic communities in an early-spring diatom bloom. Sci. Total Environ. 711, 134624. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134624

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

INTECMAR (2010) Estacións de mostraxe. Available at: http://www.intecmar.gal/Ctd/Default.aspx (Accessed February 21, 2022).

Google Scholar

IOC-UNESCO The harmful algal event database (HAEDAT). Available at: https://obis.org.

Google Scholar

Jacobs-Palmer E., Gallego R., Cribari K., Keller A. G., Kelly R. P. (2021). Environmental DNA metabarcoding for simultaneous monitoring and ecological assessment of many harmful algae. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.612107

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

John U., Šupraha L., Gran-Stadniczeñko S., Bunse C., Cembella A., Eikrem W., et al. (2022). Spatial and biological oceanographic insights into the massive fish-killing bloom of the haptophyte Chrysochromulina leadbeateri in northern Norway. Harm. algae 118, 102287. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2022.102287

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karlson B., Cusack C., Bresnan E. (2010). Microscopic and molecular methods for quantitative phytoplankton analysis (Intergovernmental oceanographic commission manuals and guides; 55) (Paris, France: UNESCO). doi: 10.25607/OBP-1371

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu M., Gu H., Krock B., Luo Z., Zhang Y. (2020). Toxic dinoflagellate blooms of Gymnodinium catenatum and their cysts in Taiwan strait and their relationship to global populations. Harm. algae 97, 101868. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2020.101868

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lundholm N., Churro C., Escalera L., Fraga S., Hoppenrath M., Iwataki M., et al. (2009) IOC-UNESCO taxonomic reference list of harmful micro algae. Available at: https://www.marinespecies.org/habon2023-03-25.

Google Scholar

McGirr S., Clarke D., Kilcoyne J., Silke J., Touzet N. (2022). Co-Localisation of azaspiracid analogs with the dinoflagellate species Azadinium spinosum and Amphidoma languida in the southwest of Ireland. Microbial. Ecol. 83 (3), 635–646. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01777-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medlin L. K., Orozco J. (2017). Molecular techniques for the detection of organisms in aquatic environments, with emphasis on harmful algal bloom species. Sensors (Basel Switzerland) 17 (5), 1184. doi: 10.3390/s17051184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Needham D. M., Fuhrman J. A. (2016). Pronounced daily succession of phytoplankton, archaea and bacteria following a spring bloom. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16005. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nogueira E., Bravo I., Montero P., Díaz-Tapia P., Calvo S., Ben-Gigirey B., et al. (2022). HABs in coastal upwelling systems: insights from an exceptional red tide of the toxigenic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum. Ecol. Indic. 137, 108790. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108790

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palenzuela J. M. T., Vilas L. M. R., Aláez F. M. B., Pazos Y. (2020). Potential application of the new sentinel satellites for monitoring of harmful algal blooms in the Galician aquaculture. Thalassas: Int. J. Mar. Sci. 36 (1), 85–93. doi: 10.1007/s41208-019-00180-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parsons M. T., Dortch Q. (2002). Sedimentological evidence of an increase in Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) abundance in response to coastal eutrophication. Limnology Oceanogr. 47 (2), 551–558. doi: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.2.0551

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reguera B., Escalera L., Pazos Y., Moroño A. (2008). La ría de vigo: una aproximación integral al ecosistema marino de la ría de vigo. Ed. González-Garcés A. (Vigo, Spain: Instituto de Estudios Vigueses), 153–199.

Google Scholar

Ríos-Castro R., Romero A., Aranguren R., Pallavicini A., Banchi E., Novoa B., et al. (2021). High-throughput sequencing of environmental DNA as a tool for monitoring eukaryotic communities and potential pathogens in a coastal upwelling ecosystem. Front. Veterinary Sci. 8. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.765606

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez G. R., Villasante S., García-Negro M.do C. (2010). Are red tides affecting economically the commercialization of the Galician (NW Spain) mussel farming? Mar. Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.08.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosón G., Cabanas J. M., Pérez F. F. (2002). “Hidrografía y dinámica de la ría de vigo. un sistema de afloramiento,” in La ría de vigo. una aproximación integral al ecosistema marino de la ría de vigo. Eds. González-Garcés A., Vilas-Martín F., Álvarez-Salgado X. A. (Vigo, Spain: Instituto de Estudios Vigueses), 51–84.

Google Scholar

Sieburth J. M., Smetacek V., Lenz J. (1978). Pelagic ecosystem structure: heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions 1. Limnology Oceanogr. 23 (6), 1256–1263. doi: 10.4319/lo.1978.23.6.1256

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stoeck T., Bass D., Nebel M., Christen R., Jones M. D., Breiner H. W., et al. (2010). Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 19 (Suppl 1), 21–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04480.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sze Y., Miranda L. N., Sin T. M., Huang D. (2018). Characterising planktonic dinoflagellate diversity in Singapore using DNA metabarcoding. Metabarcoding Metagenomics 2, e25136. doi: 10.3897/mbmg.2.25136

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trainer V. L., Bates S. S., Lundholm N., Thessen A. E., Cochlan W. P., Adams N. G., et al. (2012). Pseudo-nitzschia physiological ecology, phylogeny, toxicity, monitoring and impacts on ecosystem health. Harm. Algae 14, 271–300. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trainer V., Pitcher G., Reguera B., Smayda T. (2010). The distribution and impacts of harmful algal bloom species in eastern boundary upwelling systems. Prog. Oceanogr. 85 (1–2), 33–52. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.02.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velasco-Senovilla E., Díaz P. A., Nogueira E., Rodríguez F., Garrido J. L., Ruiz-Villareal M., et al. (2023). The niche of a stress-tolerant specialist, dinophysis acuminata, in a coastal upwelling system. Harm. Algae 125, 102427. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2023.102427

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wells M. L., Karlson B., Wulff A., Kudela R., Trick C., Asnaghi V., et al. (2020). Future HAB science: directions and challenges in a changing climate. Harm. algae 91, 101632. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101632

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wietkamp S., Krock B., Clarke D., Voß D., Salas R., Kilcoyne J., et al. (2020). Distribution and abundance of azaspiracid-producing dinophyte species and their toxins in north Atlantic and north Sea waters in summer 2018. PloS One 15 (6), e0235015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu D., Li R., Zhang F., Liu J. (2019). A review on drone-based harmful algae blooms monitoring. Environ. Monit. Assess. 191 (4), 211. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7365-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zamor R. M., Glenn K. L., Hambright K. D. (2012). Incorporating molecular tools into routine HAB monitoring programs: using qPCR to track invasive Prymnesium. Harm. Algae 15, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zapata M., Rodríguez F., Fraga S., Barra L., Ruggiero M. V. (2011). Chlorophyll c pigment patterns in 18 species (51 strains) of the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (bacillariophyceae) (1). J. Phycol. 47 (6), 1274–1280. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.01055.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou J., Richlen M. L., Sehein T. R., Kulis D. M., Anderson D. M., Cai Z. (2018). Microbial community structure and associations during a marine dinoflagellate bloom. Front. Microbiol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01201

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: harmful algal blooms, amplicon sequencing, eDNA, Pseudo-nitzschia, sediment, plankton, amnesic shellfish poisoning, paralytic shellfish poisoning

Citation: Ríos-Castro R, Novoa B, Hernández-Urcera J, Rodríguez F and Figueras A (2023) Harmful algae diversity from a coastal upwelling system detected by high-throughput sequencing. Front. Mar. Sci. 10:1200135. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1200135

Received: 04 April 2023; Accepted: 31 May 2023;
Published: 15 June 2023.

Edited by:

Panagiota Katikou, Greek Ministry of Rural Development and Food, Greece

Reviewed by:

Ruoyu Guo, Ministry of Natural Resources, China
Christine Johanna Band-Schmidt, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (IPN), Mexico

Copyright © 2023 Ríos-Castro, Novoa, Hernández-Urcera, Rodríguez and Figueras. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Antonio Figueras, YW50b25pb2ZpZ3VlcmFzQGlpbS5jc2ljLmVz

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.