Elif Eker-Develi
Ahmet E. Kideys
Alexander Mikaelyan
Michelle Jillian Devlin
Alice Newton- 1Faculty of Education, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
- 2Institute of Marine Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Mersin, Turkey
- 3Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- 4Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, United Kingdom
- 5Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro, Portugal
Editorial on the Research Topic
Phytoplankton Dynamics Under Climate Change
Phytoplankton plays an important role in ocean processes, and is well-known to have an enormous positive impact on climate change or more specifically on global warming, by reducing atmospheric CO2 levels through the sinking of produced organic and inorganic matter to the deep ocean (Falkowski, 2012; Beardall and Raven, 2013). However, climate change, with consequences of elevated seawater temperatures and decreased pH levels (Beardall and Raven, 2013), influences phytoplankton dynamics, changing phytoplankton composition, geography and biomass in the oceans (Falkowski and Oliver, 2007; Boyd et al., 2015; Jonkers et al., 2019). Temperature increases could also drive temporal shifts in the onset of the regular annual blooms, their composition, duration and amplitude as well as mismatches in timing between trophic levels (Hinder et al., 2012; Mikaelyan et al., 2015).
The overall impact of increased temperature on phytoplankton is not easy to assess due to variable and complex repercussions. For example, increasing temperatures can lead to more stratified waters, especially in summer months, and prevent nutrient replenishment at the ocean surface. The warming of surface waters can result in lower phytoplankton production, particularly concerning at low latitudes (Boyd et al., 2015; Basu and Mackey, 2018). Contrary, the increase in temperature may also lead to higher growth rates of phytoplankton with increased CO2 uptake rates from the atmosphere at high latitudes (Beaugrand et al., 2012; Boyd et al., 2015; Krumhardt et al., 2017). Extreme weather is forecasted to increase under climate change scenarios, which will result in a higher frequency of high wind and rain events. This increase in strong winds and high rainfall can influence phytoplankton biomass positively due to increased mixing and nutrient loading in particular in coastal systems (Wetz and Paerl, 2008). Reduced frequency of cold winters and unusual types of phytoplankton succession have also been reported in some regions (Mikaelyan et al., 2018). Changing weather patterns, and nutrient imbalances are thought to be driving shifts in phytoplankton community such as a decrease in the ratio of dinoflagellate to diatom abundance at high latitudes (Hinder et al., 2012).
This Research Topic on “Phytoplankton Dynamics Under Climate Change” aims to cover recent investigations performed in the field and laboratory to elucidate long-term impacts of climate change/global warming on phytoplankton species composition and abundance.
In this Research Topic, a total of six papers were published, related to the impacts of climate change on phytoplankton dynamics. Two papers are focused on Antarctic waters, a region not only important for the global CO2 ocean sequestration but also amongst the most impacted by the recent warming events (Bolinesi et al.; Ferreira et al.). The first paper reported high chlorophyll a biomass in Terra Nova Bay and the south-central Ross Sea contrasting with the high nutrient low chlorophyll a nature of the off-shore waters during summer (Bolinesi et al.). These authors underlined importance of appropriate sampling scales in understanding alternative pathways for primary production for different sub-systems. The second paper, critically reviewing the studies performed in the northern Antarctic Peninsula reveals five main gaps to ascertain the impacts of climate change on phytoplankton (Ferreira et al.). They have also remarked the short- and long-term scenarios for phytoplankton communities notably the increase of small flagellates at the expense of diatoms and their shattering consequences for the ecosystem. The third paper is a long-term study performed in a subtropical region, the Tasman Sea coast of Australia, denoted decreased abundance of a cool-affinity diatom species, Asterionellopsis glacialis from 1931–1932 to 2009–2019 and increased abundance of a warm-affinity diatom species, Leptocylindrus danicus, simultaneous with an ~1.8°C increase in water temperature in the same period (Ajani et al.). The fourth paper is related to the impact of a once in 100-year flood on phytoplankton community in Moreton Bay, Australia (Clementson et al.). This unprecedented flood resulted in very low salinity values and very high turbidity of the seawater in the bay. In spite of reduced light intensity, phytoplankton responded rapidly (1–2 weeks) to the increased nutrients provided by the flood and micro-phytoplankton composed of mainly diatoms dominated in the region. However, in the subsequent weeks the influence of the flood disappeared and the community composition changed to nano- and pico-plankton in all areas of the Bay indicating fast but short-lived effects of the flood (Clementson et al.). The fifth paper deals with changes in dinoflagellate assemblages in the west Iberian upwelling region, Portugal during 1994–2001 (Danchenko et al.). Results of the investigation revealed that potentially harmful dinoflagellate species such as Dinophysis acuminata, D. acuta, D. caudata, Prorocentrum spp., and Gonyaulax spp. generally developed during the late stage of regional upwelling season in summer-autumn months, but also following relaxation of shorter upwelling events outside of the main upwelling season, often in spring. At the same time, in the study, similar communities of harmful algal bloom species (Dinophysis spp., Lingulodinium polyedra) were favored by weaker upwelling during the main upwelling season and warmer water in late summer and autumn; it was reported that climatic trends toward weakening of summer upwelling may increase likelihood of their development (Danchenko et al.).
In the last paper, ecoevolutionary interactions between a coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi), and a diatom (Chaetoceros affinis) were investigated under increased CO2 concentrations growing alone, or competing with one another in co-occurrence (Listmann et al.). Among nine initial genotypes from each of the species, one remained as a result of highly reproducible genotype sorting treatments. Community response to climate change was depicted by a shift in the dominance of C. affinis to E. huxleyi as a result of strong evolutionary selection (Listmann et al.).
These results manifest clear consequences of climate change on primary producers in the oceans and it is evident that marine ecosystems will go on to be exposed severe effects of global warming in the future. Finally, the Guest Editors would like to sincerely thank all the authors for their valuable contributions and all the reviewers for their efforts.
Author Contributions
EE-D: conceptualization, writing, original draft, and review. AK: writing, conceptualization, validation, and review. AM, MD, and AN: writing, review, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Frontiers in Marine Science Submissions Team Manager Talitha Gray for her offer to be guest editor of this special topic. We also thank Dr. Angel Borja for his valuable comments.
References
Basu, S., and Mackey, K. R. M. (2018). Phytoplankton as key mediators of the biological carbon pump: their responses to a changing climate. Sustainability 10, 869. doi: 10.3390/su10030869
Beardall, J., and Raven, J. A. (2013). Calcification and ocean acidification: new insights from the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. New Phytol. 199, 1–3. doi: 10.1111/nph.12297
Beaugrand, G., McQuatters-Gollop, A., Edwards, M., and Goberville, E. (2012). Long-term responses of North Atlantic calcifying plankton to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 263–267. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1753
Boyd, P. W., Lennartz, S. T., Glover, D. M., and Doney, S. C. (2015). Biological ramifications of climate-change mediated oceanic multi-stressors. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 71–79. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2441
Falkowski, P. G., and Oliver, M. J. (2007). Mix and match: how climate selects phytoplankton. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 813–819. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1751
Hinder, S. L., Hays, G. C., Edwards, M., Roberts, E. C., Walne, A. W., and Gravenor, M. B. (2012). Changes in marine dinoflagellate and diatom abundance under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 271–275 doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1388
Jonkers, L., Hillebrand, H., and Kucera, M. (2019). Global change drives modern plankton communities away from the pre-industrial state. Nature 570, 372–375. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1230-3
Krumhardt, K. M., Lovenduski, N. S., Iglesias-Rodríguez, M. D., and Kleypas, J. A. (2017). Coccolithophore growth and calcification in a changing ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 159, 276–295. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2017.10.007
Mikaelyan, A. S., Kubryakov, A. A., Silkin, V. A., Pautova, L. A., and Chasovnikov, V. K. (2018). Regional climate and patterns of phytoplankton annual succession in the open waters of the Black Sea. Deep Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 142, 44–57. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.08.001
Mikaelyan, A. S., Pautova, L. A., Chasovnikov, V. K., Mosharov, S. A., and Silkin, V. A. (2015). Alternation of diatoms and coccolithophores in the northeastern Black Sea: a response to nutrient changes. Hydrobiologia 755, 89–105. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2219-z
Keywords: climate change, phytoplankton dynamics, CO2, biodiversity, harmful algal blooms
Citation: Eker-Develi E, Kideys AE, Mikaelyan A, Devlin MJ and Newton A (2022) Editorial: Phytoplankton Dynamics Under Climate Change. Front. Mar. Sci. 9:869618. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.869618
Received: 04 February 2022; Accepted: 15 February 2022;
Published: 09 March 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Angel Borja, Technological Center Expert in Marine and Food Innovation (AZTI), Spain
Copyright © 2022 Eker-Develi, Kideys, Mikaelyan, Devlin and Newton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elif Eker-Develi, ZWxpZmVrZXImI3gwMDA0MDtnbWFpbC5jb20=