Oligotrophic Phytoplankton Community Effectively Adjusts to Artificial Upwelling Regardless of Intensity, but Differently Among Upwelling Modes
- 1Marine Biogeochemistry, Biological Oceanography, Geomar Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- 2Oceanografía Biológica, Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, IOCAG, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
- 3Polar Biological Oceanography Section, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
A corrigendum on
Oligotrophic phytoplankton community effectively adjusts to artificial upwelling regardless of intensity, but differently among upwelling modes
by Ortiz J, Arístegui J, Hernández-Hernández N, Fernández-Méndez M and Riebesell U (2022) 9:880550. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.880550
In the published article, there was an error in Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6 as published. The figures were moved and do not match the correctly positioned captions. The corrections for each figure/caption combination are listed below.
Figure 3 Inorganic nutrient concentration over the course of the study. Dotted lines represent DW additions, dashed line marks the single DW addition to singular treatments. S, singular; R,. recurring treatment. Atlantic refers to samples taken from the water surrounding the mesocosm field.
Figure 4 Relative size class contributions of micro-, nano- and picoplankton to total PP rates, Chla concentration and phytoplankton C. PP plots also include PPDOC rates. Mind the different y-axis scales. The blank spot in the Atlantic between d35-37 is due to one missing data point. Dotted lines represent DW additions, dashed line marks the single DW addition to singular treatments. Recurring treatments labelled in blue, singular in red.
Figure 5 Temporal development of carbon to chlorophyll ratios (C:Chla) separated by size fractions and upwelling mode. S, Singular; R, Recurring. Mind the different y-axis scales. Dotted lines represent DW additions, dashed line marks the single DW addition to singular treatments.
Figure 6 Mean carbon assimilation numbers (AN) and standard deviations for total phytoplankton, microphytoplankton (20-250 µm), nanophytoplankton (2-20 µm) and picophytoplankton (0.2-2 µm). Shaded area shows standard deviation for total phytoplankton AN.].
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: artificial upwelling, primary production, mesocosm, biomass, phytoplankton, oligotrophic
Citation: Ortiz J, Arístegui J, Hernández-Hernández N, Fernández-Méndez M and Riebesell U (2022) Corrigendum: Oligotrophic phytoplankton community effectively adjusts to artificial upwelling regardless of intensity, but differently among upwelling modes. Front. Mar. Sci. 9:1014210. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1014210
Received: 08 August 2022; Accepted: 09 August 2022;
Published: 22 August 2022.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Monique Messié, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI), United StatesCopyright © 2022 Ortiz, Arístegui, Hernández-Hernández, Fernández-Méndez and Riebesell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Joaquin Ortiz, am9ydGl6QGdlb21hci5kZQ==