Brett W. Molony1*
Alex T. Ford2
Ana M. M. Sequeira3
Angel Borja4,5
Anna Milena Zivian6
Carol Robinson7
Christian Lønborg8
Elva G. Escobar-Briones9
Emanuele Di Lorenzo10
Jesper H. Andersen11
Marius N. Müller12
Michelle J. Devlin13
Pierre Failler2
Sebastian Villasante14
Simone Libralato15
Tomaso Fortibuoni15,16- 1Oceans and Atmosphere, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Perth, WA, Australia
- 2Centre for Blue Governance, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
- 3UWA Oceans Institute and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- 4AZTI, Marine Research, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Herrera Kaia, Portualdea z/g, Pasaia, Spain
- 5Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- 6Ocean Conservancy, Washington, DC, United States
- 7School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
- 8Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 9National Autonomous University of Mexico, México City, Mexico
- 10Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 11NIVA Denmark Water Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 12Department of Oceanography, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
- 13Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, United Kingdom
- 14Department of Applied Economics, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- 15Department of Oceanography, National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale) OGS, Trieste, Italy
- 16Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale) - ISPRA, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Sustainable Development Goal 14 - Life Below Water: Towards a Sustainable Ocean
United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 – Life Below Water – is arguably one of the most challenging of the 17 goals (United Nations, 2016) due to the immense scale of the Ocean (almost three-quarters of the planet's surface) and the direct links to many other SDGs. For example, No Poverty (SDG 1), Zero Hunger (SDG2) and Good Health and Well-Being (SDG 3) all rely on sustainable Life Below Water (SDG 14). In turn, Climate Action (SDG 13) is needed to achieve SDG 14, and the Ocean is essential in achieving SDG 13. There is much that we still do not know; indeed, the Ocean represents more than 99% of the space where organisms can live, yet more than 80% of the Ocean remains unexplored, especially the deep-sea.
The launch of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021–2030) aims at catalyzing a global focus to advance SDG 14 (Borja et al., 2020a). This will enhance the co-design of knowledge and actions for transformative ocean solutions, to address the challenges of a growing human population and climate change. Human pressures on the Ocean are important – 37% of the human population live in the coast from small villages to megacities exceeding 10 million people (e.g., New York, Shanghai, Lagos) and use the Ocean for a huge range of inputs, outputs and services, including amenity, food, transport, cooling water and waste disposal, as well as traditional and cultural uses. Many of these ecosystem services are undervalued, being conservatively estimated at $12.6 Trillion annually more than 20 years ago (Costanza et al., 1997). This is without considering two of the most severely undervalued services provided by the Ocean, as heat and carbon sinks, that have buffered many of the negative impacts of climate change. Many anthropogenic activities are leaving significant, direct and measurable global footprints in the Ocean with high profile examples including fishing1,2,3,, shipping lanes (Liu et al., 2019; Pirotta et al., 2019), dredging4, plastic pollution (Hardesty et al., 2017; Barrett et al., 2020), noise pollution (Di Franco et al., 2020; Chahouri et al., 2021; Duarte et al., 2021), and changes in Ocean chemistry5.
Human populations rely directly on the Ocean for food and other commercial activities, but a growing body of research has identified our dependency on the Ocean for health and well-being (Borja et al., 2020b). Other ecosystem services provided by the Ocean are also yet to be properly considered. These include the cultural and spiritual services provided by the Ocean (Brown and Hausner, 2017; de Juan et al., 2021), which have developed over millennia of human relationships with the Ocean and represent knowledge and connections that extend beyond monetary value. Aiming to integrate this knowledge in scientific endeavours, many indigenous peoples are bringing their traditional science and knowledge to partner with western science (Mazzocchi, 2006) and provide a more in-depth and long-term understanding of the Ocean, especially in coastal areas (Mustonen et al., 2021).
While the challenges are clear and sometimes seem overwhelming, approaches and solutions are being actively developed and tested; several of these are explored in this Research Topic.
With more than three billion people who rely on fish for at least 20% of their daily protein, and more than 120 million directly employed in the fishing and aquaculture sectors6, sustainable fishing (Penca; Fiorentino and Vitale; Jaiteh et al.) and aquaculture (Azra et al.) were a natural focus of several papers. This included a call for reducing effort in mixed species fisheries, and therefore fishing mortality, to take into account the differing and lower productivity of some species and the risk to their sustainability (Newman et al., 2018), and adopt a quota system based on “pretty good yield” (Hilborn, 2010).
Others emphasized the need for better conservation planning and coordination (Katsanevakis et al.; Ceccarelli et al.; Herrera et al.) as well as integration of their cultural and spiritual values into wider society (Baker et al.). This includes the need to improve spatial management, providing specific approaches to minimize human impacts and risks to charismatic megafauna. This management approach could be applied to whale watching activities, to support sustainable non-extractive human activities in the Ocean (Almunia et al.). The article by Adewumi et al., dealing with the Guinea Current Large Marine Ecosystem shared among Benin, Nigeria, and Cameroon, highlighted the challenges of international ocean governance, a result of political characteristics, the relics of colonialism, and increasing ocean use and pressure on marine ecosystems and services. The administrative and political arrangements differ significantly among countries, complicating transnational collaboration. The review of these arrangements revealed varying levels of convergence at international, regional and national levels, and could be a model to assist regional fishery management organizations to support positive steps toward ocean sustainability (Juan-Jordá et al., 2018).
Future risks to the Ocean (Garcia-Soto et al.), including those imposed by climate change (Green et al.), and the tools (Mariani et al.), approaches (e.g., Endrédi et al.; Hsu et al.), and ways to monitor this complex system (Jones et al.), including biodiversity (Herrera et al.), highlighted the extraordinary and diverse values of the Ocean and challenges (Figure 1). Embracing modern technologies (Almunia et al.; Green et al.), including the Internet of Things (Mariani et al.), could also promote and support a harmonization of ocean monitoring among all nations, and support international initiatives and cooperation7, including platforms to involve the wider community8.
Figure 1. Word cloud generated from the key words from the SDG 14 papers contributed toward this Frontiers in Marine Science Research Topic [Generated through WordArt.com - Word Cloud Art Creator]. Some key words were truncated to simplify the generation of the word cloud.
The social dimension (Haward and Haas) will also be critical as a way of valuing and engaging with direct and indirect stakeholders of the Ocean and in developing better policies for governance (Paredes-Coral et al.; Polejack; Adewumi et al.; Kirkfeldt and Frazão Santos; Archana and Baker; Rohmana et al.). This is especially true at the land-sea interface (Singh et al.) where human populations concentrate and the risks from a changing climate are directly evident, with projected sea level rise (Nicholls and Cazenave, 2010; Hooijer and Vernimmen, 2021), and more frequent and intense storms (Pugatch, 2019; Chen et al., 2020). It is also true for the deep ocean (Howell et al.), which remains largely unexplored. The socio-ecological connections described in this Research Topic of Frontiers in Marine Science provide frameworks and hope for a sustainable future for the coasts and ocean.
While this Frontiers in Marine Science Research Topic does not represent all initiatives underway globally to address SDG 14, it provides a glimpse of some of the diverse approaches and intellectual capital invested in ocean sustainability. While the goal focuses on Life Below Water, these approaches directly support many other SDGs, which arguably cannot be achieved without a healthy and sustainable ocean (Mustonen et al., 2021).
We hope that other initiatives currently underway will assist in not only highlighting the links between SDG 14 and other SDGs but also provide a way for synergies among disparate knowledge domains to support transdisciplinary and multi-sectoral approaches for good policy development. As examples, we note the significant initiatives around the globe in areas of blue carbon and an equitable “blue economy.” Blue carbon projects not only protect and restore seagrass, mangrove, salt marsh, and macrophytes, but also support the associated biodiversity and human livelihoods that depend on these critical habitat-forming species. “Working with nature approaches” including in the restoration of corals, seagrasses, seaweeds, and mangroves are underway around the globe, with new methods being developed and tested [e.g., genetic techniques to identify more heat tolerant species of coral (Buerger et al., 2020) and other marine habitat building species (Alsuwaiyan et al., 2021)].
The efforts in these areas will be underpinned by new methods of accounting—such as blue carbon, biodiversity, ecosystem services and a framework of ocean accounting which is currently being developed9. This approach embraces environmental, social and cultural accounting, in addition to economic accounting, to better assess and value entire marine areas and ecosystems and integrate a wide range of SDGs. Our hope is that this will support and enable clearer and better decisions by ocean and coastal management agencies. These decisions should be based on a number of decision support tools, including: (i) management strategy evaluation approaches, (ii) scenario testing including assessing a range of alternative approaches, and (iii) potentially creating digital twins to test and explore management decisions before ocean activities commence.
We look forward to making the difficult possible and contributing to a vibrant, thriving future throughout the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development and the UN Decade of Restoration (Waltham et al., 2020) based on some of the cutting-edge approaches detailed in this Research Topic of Frontiers in Marine Science.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1. ^https://globalfishingwatch.org/.
2. ^http://www.seaaroundus.org/.
3. ^https://www.minderoo.org/global-fishing-index/.
4. ^https://wamsi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/2019/10/Dredging-Science-Synthesis-Report-A-Synthesis-of-Research-2012-2018-April-2019.pdf.
5. ^https://www.science.org.au/curious/earth-environment/ocean-acidification.
6. ^https://www.fao.org/in-action/eaf-nansen/news-events/detail-events/en/c/1413988/.
7. ^https://www.geoaquawatch.org/.
References
Alsuwaiyan, N. A., Vranken, S., Filbee-Dexter, K., Cambridge, M., Coleman, M. A., and Wernberg, T. (2021). Genotypic variation in response to extreme events may facilitate kelp adaptation under future climates. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 672, 111–121. doi: 10.3354/meps13802
Barrett, J., Chase, Z., Zhang, J., Holl, M. M. B., Willis, K., Williams, A., et al. (2020). Microplastic pollution in deep-sea sediments from the Great Australian Bight. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:576170. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.576170
Borja, A., Andersen, J. H., Arvanitidis, C. D., Basset, A., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Carvalho, S., et al. (2020a). Past and future grand challenges in marine ecosystem ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:362. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00362
Borja, A., White, M. P., Berdalet, E., Bock, N., Eatock, C., Kristensen, P., et al. (2020b). Moving toward an agenda on ocean health and human health in Europe. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:37. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00037
Brown, G., and Hausner, V. H. (2017). An empirical analysis of cultural ecosystem values in coastal landscapes. Ocean Coast. Manag. 142, 49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.03.019
Buerger, P., Alvarez-Roa, C., Coppin, C. W., Pearce, S. L., Chakravarti, L. J., Oakeshott, J. G., et al. (2020). Heat-evolved microalgal symbionts increase coral bleaching tolerance. Sci. Adv. 6:eaba2498. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba2498
Chahouri, A., Elouahmani, N., and Ouchene, H. (2021). Recent progress in marine noise pollution: a thorough review. Chemosphere 2021:132983. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132983
Chen, J., Wang, Z., Tam, C. Y., Lau, N. C., Lau, D. S., Lau, D., et al. (2020). Impacts of climate change on tropical cyclones and induced storm surges in the Pearl River Delta region using pseudo-global-warming method. Sci. Rep. 10:1965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58824-8
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
de Juan, S., Ospina-Álvarez, A., Villasante, S., and Ruiz-Frau, A. (2021). A graph theory approach to assess nature's contribution to people at a global scale. Sci. Rep. 11, 9118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88745-z
Di Franco, C., Faverney, R., Rossi, F., Sabourault, C., Spennato, G., Verrando, P., et al. (2020). Effects of marine noise pollution on Mediterranean fishes and invertebrates: a review. Mar. Poll. Bullet. 159:111450. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111450
Duarte, C. M., Chapuis, L., Collin, S. P., Costa, D. P., Devassy, R. P., Eguiluz, V. M., et al. (2021). The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean. Science. 371:eaba4658. doi: 10.1126/science.aba4658
Hardesty, B. D., Lawson, T. J., van der Velde, T., Lansdell, M., and Wilcox, C. (2017). Estimating quantities and sources of marine debris at a continental scale. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 18–25. doi: 10.1002/fee.1447
Hilborn, R.. (2010). Pretty Good Yield and exploited fishes. Mar. Pol. 34, 193–196. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.04, 013.
Hooijer, A., and Vernimmen, R. (2021). Global LiDAR land elevation data reveal greatest sea-level rise vulnerability in the tropics. Nat. Commun. 12:3592. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23810-9
Juan-Jordá, M. J., Murua, H., Arrizabalaga, H., Dulvy, N. K., and Restrepo, V. (2018). Report card on ecosystem-based fisheries management in tuna regional fisheries management organizations. Fish Fisheries 19, 321–339. doi: 10.1111/faf.12256
Liu, H., Meng, Z. H., Lv, Z. F., Wang, X. T., Deng, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2019). Emissions and health impacts from global shipping embodied in US–China bilateral trade. Nat. Sustainabil. 2, 1027–1033. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0414-z
Mazzocchi, F.. (2006). Western science and traditional knowledge. Despite their variations, different forms of knowledge can learn from each other. EMBO Rep. 7, 463–466. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400693
Mustonen, T., Maxwell, K. H., Mustonen, K., Jones, R., Pedersen, H., Nuunoq, J. G., et al. (2021). Who is the ocean? Preface to the future seas 2030 special issue. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 21:9655. doi: 10.1007/s11160-021-09655-x
Newman, S. J., Brown, J. I., Fairclough, D. V., Wise, B. S., Bellchambers, L. M., Molony, B. W., et al. (2018). A risk assessment and prioritisation approach to the selection of indicator species for the assessment of multi-species, multi-gear, multi-sector fishery resources. Mar. Pol. 88, 11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.10, 028.
Nicholls, R. J., and Cazenave, A. (2010). Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328, 1517–1520. doi: 10.1126/science.1185782
Pirotta, V., Grech, A., Jonsen, I. D., Laurance, W. F., and Harcourt, R. G. (2019). Consequences of global shipping traffic for marine giants. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 39–47. doi: 10.1002/fee.1987
Pugatch, T.. (2019). Tropical storms and mortality under climate change. World Dev. 117, 172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.01.009
United Nations (2016). Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1). New York, NY: United Nations Economic and Social Council, 49.
Keywords: Sustainable Development Goal 14 - Life Below Water, SDGs, ocean, livelihoods, United Nation (UN)
Citation: Molony BW, Ford AT, Sequeira AMM, Borja A, Zivian AM, Robinson C, Lønborg C, Escobar-Briones EG, Di Lorenzo E, Andersen JH, Müller MN, Devlin MJ, Failler P, Villasante S, Libralato S and Fortibuoni T (2022) Editorial: Sustainable Development Goal 14 - Life Below Water: Towards a Sustainable Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:829610. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.829610
Received: 06 December 2021; Accepted: 29 December 2021;
Published: 24 February 2022.
Edited by:
Donald F. Boesch, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES), United StatesCopyright © 2022 Molony, Ford, Sequeira, Borja, Zivian, Robinson, Lønborg, Escobar-Briones, Di Lorenzo, Andersen, Müller, Devlin, Failler, Villasante, Libralato and Fortibuoni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Brett W. Molony, YnJldHQubW9sb255JiN4MDAwNDA7Y3Npcm8uYXU=