94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Jörg H. Fritz1,2,3*Thomas A. Kufer4- 1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- 2McGill University Research Center on Complex Traits (MRCCT), McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- 3Dahdaleh Institute of Genomic Medicine (DIgM), McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- 4Department of Immunology, Institute for Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
Methods in molecular innate immunity: 2022
Advances in immunology are inherently linked to progress in implementing novel methods as best illustrated by the development of the cre-lox technique that allows to analyse the effect of single genes on lymphocyte development and function by the generation of “conditional” knock-out mice (1). Development of novel as well as the optimization of existing technologies and methods furthers constant progress in biomedical research. The most recent game changer being the development of the bacterial immune system CRISPR-Cas9 into a universal tool for gene and genome editing (2).
Here in this Research Topic on “Methods in Molecular Innate Immunity: 2022” we provide a brief collection of state-of the art methods and protocols to enable in-depth studies of innate immune responses in in vitro cell culture systems as well as in in vivo models.
The identification of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and the rapid progress made in this field showed that ILCs exert essential roles in immune responses and tissue homeostasis (3). Four detailed protocols deal with the characterization of ILCs, their genetic manipulation, as well as the analysis of their metabolic states, respectively. Audouze-Chaud et al. provide a novel CRISPR/Cas9 protocol for efficient genetic knockout in human group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) and discuss challenges and solutions. Sadeghalvad et al. present a detailed protocol for cytometric analysis of ILCs and provide tips for its successful implementation. Roy-Dorval et al. detail approaches for analysis of lipid uptake, storage, and fatty acid oxidation by ILC2s, while Krisna et al. provide a comprehensive framework for the immunometabolic analysis of primary murine ILC2s.
In vivo analysis of the distribution of immune cell subsets and their activation status was boosted by the development of single cell sequencing techniques, primarily single-cell RNA sequencing (4). Mindt et al. present a protocol to allow for spatial differentiation in single-cell RNA sequencing by using barcoded antibodies.
Macrophages and neutrophils are the first line of the innate immune defence. While macrophages emerged as key instruments to study innate immune responses due to their easy differentiation in vitro and their robustness in cell culture (5), neutrophils are extremely short-lived and isolation strategies for in vitro assays were only recently developed (6). In addition to its central role in host defence upon microbial challenge, the immune system is increasingly recognized as an integral part of fundamental physiological processes such as development, reproduction and wound healing, which involves a very close crosstalk with other body systems such as metabolism, the central nervous system and the cardiovascular system is evident (7). One prominent example being the discovery that TNFα is secreted from adipose tissue in obese mice and drives insulin resistance, highlighting that metabolic disorders are intimately linked to dysregulated immune responses (8). In an original research article, Iovino et al. present novel insights into the link of macrophage activation by saturated fatty acids and IRE1 RNase in metabolic reprogramming. Their work highlights a key role of IRE1α in HIF-1α-mediated glycolysis in macrophages independent of XBP1s.
Immune cell activation is tightly linked to changes in the metabolic wiring and mitochondrial activity. The development of devices to measure extracellular flux by redox potential changes in small volumes generated the basis to study cellular metabolic changes upon immune cell activation in great detail (9). Grudzinska et al. provide a protocol that exemplifies how extracellular flux (XF) analysis can be used to measure metabolism and oxidate burst in activated neutrophils.
The core function of innate immunity is the quick and often cell intrinsic reaction towards pathogen challenge (10). Zhi et al. detail investigations of the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and its modulation by traditional Chinese medicines. Furthermore, detailed studies of host-pathogen interactions at a time-resolved and molecular level are providing exiting new insights into the function of innate immune responses. Using a GFP fluorophore that is quenched when exposed to reactive oxygen species combined with a stable secondary fluorescent marker Hinman et al. provide a useful protocol to analyse killing of the human pathogen Staphyococcus aureus and neutrophil function in murine disease models.
We are living in an environment that is more and more polluted with chemicals that can affect the innate immune response. Plastic- and environment-derived bisphenol A (BPA) for example can accumulate in the human body and acts as an endocrine-disrupting compound. Dallio et al. analysed BPA levels in individuals and stimulated monocytes with BPA to assess metabolic and cytokine profiling.
This brief Research Topic will be helpful for research professional and trainees to implement novel methodologies to further detail the wealth of functions of the innate immune system upon microbial challenge and during inflammatory processes.
Author contributions
JF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Rajewsky K. From a dream to reality. Eur J Immunol. (2007) 37 Suppl 1:S134–7. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737819
2. Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with crispr-cas9. Science. (2014) 346:1258096. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096
3. Diefenbach A, Colonna M, Koyasu S. Development, differentiation, and diversity of innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. (2014) 41:354–65. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.005
4. Stark R, Grzelak M, Hadfield J. Rna sequencing: the teenage years. Nat Rev Genet. (2019) 20:631–56. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0150-2
5. Luque-Martin R, Mander PK, Leenen PJM, Winther MPJ. Classic and new mediators for in vitro modelling of human macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. (2021) 109:549–60. doi: 10.1002/JLB.1RU0620-018R
6. Monceaux V, Chiche-Lapierre C, Chaput C, Witko-Sarsat V, Prevost MC, Taylor CT, et al. Anoxia and glucose supplementation preserve neutrophil viability and function. Blood. (2016) 128:993–1002. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-680918
7. Sattler S. The role of the immune system beyond the fight against infection. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2017) 1003:3–14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57613-8_1
8. Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. (2006) 444:860–7. doi: 10.1038/nature05485
9. Ferrick DA, Neilson A, Beeson C. Advances in measuring cellular bioenergetics using extracellular flux. Drug Discov Today. (2008) 13:268–74. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.12.008
Keywords: innate immunity, inflammation, methods, innate lymphoid cells, myeloid cells
Citation: Fritz JH and Kufer TA (2025) Editorial: Methods in molecular innate immunity: 2022. Front. Immunol. 16:1576957. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576957
Received: 14 February 2025; Accepted: 17 February 2025;
Published: 28 February 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Francesca Granucci, University of Milano-Bicocca, ItalyCopyright © 2025 Fritz and Kufer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jörg H. Fritz, am9yZy5mcml0ekBtY2dpbGwuY2E=