BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Immunol., 20 January 2025

Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics

Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1524813

Lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD20 and chemotherapy display disconnected T and B cell responses to COVID-19 vaccine

Sylvain Lamure,&#x;Sylvain Lamure1,2†Houria Hendel Chavez&#x;Houria Hendel Chavez3†Marie-Ghislaine de Goër de Herve&#x;Marie-Ghislaine de Goër de Herve3†Luc-Matthieu ForneckerLuc-Matthieu Fornecker4Bernard DrenouBernard Drenou5Caroline JacquetCaroline Jacquet6Fatiha MerabetFatiha Merabet7Milena KohnMilena Kohn7Florence QulinFlorence Quélin8Angela JacksonAngela Jackson9Sylvain ChoquetSylvain Choquet10Rmy DulryRémy Duléry11Yassine Taoufik*&#x;Yassine Taoufik3*‡Caroline Besson,*&#x;Caroline Besson7,9*‡
  • 1Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
  • 2Service d’onco-hématologie, Hôpitaux Nord-Ouest, Villefranche-Sur-Saône, France
  • 3Laboratoire Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) U1186, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
  • 4Service d’Hématologie, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
  • 5Service d’Hématologie, Groupe Hospitalier de Mulhouse Sud Alsace, Mulhouse, France
  • 6Service d’Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire (CHRU) de Nancy, Nancy, France
  • 7Service d’Hématologie Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France
  • 8Maison de la Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France
  • 9Université Paris-Saclay, Université de Versailles – Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Inserm, Équipe “Exposome et Hérédité”, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), Villejuif, France
  • 10Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)- Sorbonne University, Paris, France
  • 11Service d’Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Inserm UMRs 938, Paris, France

Due to immunosuppressive treatment, COVID-19 vaccination is challenging in patients with B-cell lymphoma. We prospectively evaluated CD4, CD8 T-cell and serological responses to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of patients treated for a B-cell lymphoma with anti-CD20 therapy. During lymphoma treatment, CD4, CD8, and CD19 cell dropped. While functional-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 were unaffected, vaccination in patients on treatment induced low specific antibody titers, contrasting with a preserved serological response when vaccination was completed before treatment initiation. Those findings reinforce a vaccinal strategy based on completion before lymphoma treatment, with a booster administered afterward.

Introduction

B-cell lymphoma patients were initially identified at high risk for death or a severe course of COVID-19, especially for those treated with B-cell-depleting immunotherapies (1). The incidence of death due to COVID-19 decreased from 30% to 6% early in 2022 (2) with the spreading of the omicron strain and the use of antiviral drug combinations such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, convalescent plasma, and the generalization of vaccination (3). Vaccination is challenging among patients treated for a B-cell malignancy: administering anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies alone or combined with T cell-depleting agents like cyclophosphamide and bendamustine is immunosuppressive. In addition, T-cell exhaustion is a common feature in the context of cancer. Different studies showed that repeated vaccine injections improved the seroconversion rate and antibody titer (4) and that the CD4 T cell response is not impaired by the malignancy and its treatments (58). Regarding CD8 cytotoxic T-cell (CTL), few studies have been conducted on this population, but one reported a preserved CTL response (9).

We designed the Lymphocovac study to address the impact of B-cell lymphoma treatment on the functional cellular and humoral immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and determine the optimal vaccination time.

Methods

We ran a prospective multicentric study (NCT 05050461) between November 2021 and July 2022, including adult patients with B-cell malignancy either during lymphoma therapy or after treatment completion, vaccinated against SARS-COV2 with at least two shots of a commercial mRNA vaccine. Patients treated with CAR T-cells and/or allogeneic transplantation, as well as those with a short life expectancy (i.e., six months or less), were excluded. We also recruited a cohort of healthy individuals who received at least two shots of the same vaccine among patients’ spouses.

We collected data regarding vaccination (number of injections, dates), clinically and biologically documented episodes of COVID-19 and their severity, monoclonal antibody prophylaxis, lymphoma characteristics and treatments (subtype of lymphoma, anti-tumoral treatment combination, date of treatment initiation, date of treatment completion and treatment response).

A 45 mL peripheral blood sampling was performed 3 to 9 months after the last vaccine injection. Flow cytometry was used to determine the percentages and absolute counts of CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, CD19+ B-cells, and CD16+ CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells counts (BD Multitest), and the expression of the exhaustion markers CTLA4, PD1, TIM3, LAG3, and TIGIT on CD4 and CD8 T cells (BD LSR Fortessa). Euroimmun ELISA Quantivac test was used to determine SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer; the positivity threshold was defined for titers higher than 11 relative units (RU/mL). To determine CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses, Interferon-gamma (IFN-g) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-a) secretion by CD4 T cells and Perforin and Granzyme B secretion by CD8 T cells were assessed by intracellular flow cytometry after overnight incubation of cells with overlapping peptide pools covering SARS-CoV-2 immunodominant sequences (SARS-CoV-2 Select Peptivator, Miltenyi Biotec). The background observed in non-activated cells was deducted to evaluate the specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 response. Results were indicated as IFN-g and/or TNF-expressing cells per mm3 for CD4 T cells and perforin and/or granzyme B-expressing cells per mm3. Flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo Software.

Quantitative variables are presented with their median. We categorized immunological and clinical data according to the time interval since their last treatment [cut-off at 12 months between the categories "treatement" and "post-treatment" as anti-CD20 induced immunodepression lasts up to 12 months (10)]. Comparisons were made with the Mann–Whitney test or Fisher’s exact test. Analysis and figures were made with GraphPad software version 9.

Results

We included 49 individuals, 42 B-cell lymphoma patients, and 7 healthy spouses. Patients characteristics are presented in Table 1: 60% were male, and the median age was 66 (IQR 38-77). All patients received at least 2 injections of mRNA vaccine, and 64% had no history of clinically or biologically documented COVID-19. 48% are suffering from DLBCL, 31% from follicular lymphoma, and 60% of them received a single line of treatment. All of them received an anti-CD20 therapeutic monoclonal antibody; the last treatment was a combination with chemotherapy for 74% of patients. 21% of them had prior bendamustine exposure.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Patient’s characteristics.

We compared lymphocyte counts of patients with healthy individuals (Figure 1A). CD4 T cell counts were higher in healthy individuals (median count 1.01 G/L) than among patients: a recent treatment had a stronger impact (median count 0.38 G/L, p<0.01) than an older treatment (0.54 G/L, p <0.01). Similarly, CD8 counts (median 0.22 G/L) of recently treated patients were lower than healthy individuals (0.68 G/L, p=0.03). As expected, B cells were undetectable in patients recently treated (0.26 G/L in healthy donors, p< 0.01). B cell reconstitution occurred after 12 months after treatment completion. Treatment did not impact NK cell count.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Immune deficiency and vaccinal response in B-cell lymphoma. 7 healthy controls were compared to 42 patients according to their treatment status: ongoing treatment when sampling was performed during treatment (between initiation and up to 1 year after its completion), or former when treatment was completed more than a year before the sampling, (A) for their T, CD4 and CD8, B and NK cell count, (B) for the exhaustion’s markers of CD4 T cells. (C) compares the vaccinal response: antibody titer, with a positivity threshold at 11 RU/mL, CD4 expressing interferon (IFN) and/or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and CD8 expressing perforin (PRF) and/or granzyme B (GRZ) of patients that were fully vaccinated before starting their treatment, during treatment or within 1 year after its completion, or more than 1 year after treatment completion, to healthy individuals. Mann-Whitney test was performed using Prism Graph Pad, p-value summary: *0.01-0.05, **0.001-0.01, ***0.001-0.0001, ****<0.0001: ns, not significant.

Then, we measured the expression of exhaustion markers. CD4 T cells of recently treated patients had more exhaustion features than those treated longer ago, with a higher expression of PD1 (31% vs. 21%, p=0.04), TIM3 (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p=0.04) and TIGIT (9.9% vs. 6%, p=0.03), there was a trend for LAG3 (4.7% vs. 1.4%, p=0.08), but similar expression of CTLA4 (Figure 1B). Furthermore, CD8 expression of TIM3 that was higher for patients undergoing treatment (p=0.05) and other exhaustion markers on CD8 was similar in patients and healthy controls (Supplementary Figure S1).

Blood was sampled between 10 and 426 days after the last injection. Time from last vaccination did not correlate with humoral or cellular response; except in the subgroup of controls where median antibody titer decreased over time (r -0.8, p=0.03), and CD4 response tended to decrease (p=0.05), contrary to the CD8 response. We analyzed vaccinal response according to the timing of the last vaccine shot: before the start of lymphoma treatment, during treatment, until 12 months after treatment completion, or more than 12 months after treatment completion, and compared to healthy individuals (Figure 1C). Patients who received 2 shots had similar serological and cellular responses to those receiving 3.

Patients serological response was lower than healthy controls (all seropositive) when vaccination was performed during treatment (13/25 seronegative, p=0.02), and similar to those of controls when vaccination was completed either before its initiation (1/9 seronegative), or more than a year after completion (2/7 seronegative). Considering only seropositive individuals, median antibody titer of healthy individuals was 155 RU/mL (IQR 128-158), compared to 84 RU/mL for patients vaccinated before treatment start (IQR 46-139, p=0.07), 20 RU/mL for patients vaccinated during treatment (IQR 8-76, p=0.03) and 80 RU/mL for patients vaccinated after treatment (IQR 24-121, p=0.25).

In contrast, we found no difference between groups in CD4 production of interferon and/or tumor necrosis factor and in CD8 production of perforin and/or granzyme B. Of note, a high expression of TIM3 on CD4 cells correlated with a lower antibody titer (Spearman r score -0.37, p=0.02), as well as a high TIGIT expression on CD4 correlated with a lower number of CD8 perforin and/or granzyme B positive (Spearman r score -0.35, p=0.04) (Supplementary Figure S2). We observed no difference in vaccine response according to bendamustine use or anti-CD20 monotherapy or combination therapy (Supplementary Figure S3).

We identified 19 individuals with a documented infection: 15 cases of SARS-Cov-2 infection occurring before vaccination, and 4 cases of SARS-Cov-2 infection occurring post-vaccination. The 15 infections occurred before vaccination in 4 healthy controls and in 11 patients, of which 2 had a severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. Antibody titers, CD4 and CD8 T cell responses of the individuals infected before their vaccination were similar to those with no prior documented infection. Among the 4 patients that were infected post-vaccination, none of them required hospitalization or oxygen supply. The median time between the last injection and infection was 126 days (min 25, max 220); 3 were suffering from DLBCL, one from follicular lymphoma, 2 had no detectable neutralizing antibodies, the others had 92 and 170 RU/mL (median 50 RU/mL) at the time of the study, 3 of them had a functional CD4 response. All of them had a functional CD8 response. The 4 patients were vaccinated between the start of the treatment and a year after completion.

Discussion

In this prospective case-control study, we measured the impact of B-cell lymphoma treatments on the functional immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. B cell depletion and lower CD4 and CD8 counts were found in patients under treatment or recently treated for lymphoma. We also observed exhaustion features on CD4 T cells. Patients vaccinated between lymphoma treatment initiation and one year after its completion showed a poor antibody response but preserved CD4 and CD8 T cell responses, contrasting with a preserved B cell vaccinal response when vaccination was completed before the treatment initiation.

Indeed, long lived vaccinal virus-specific memory B cells as well as long lived plasma cells can resist to rituximab treatment (11), preserving vaccinal protection acquired before anti-CD20 initiation. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report a preserved memory response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for some patients treated with anti-CD20.

Previous works reported an impaired humoral response in patients with B-cell lymphoma that could be counteracted with a booster dose (4, 5, 12). Different studies showed a preserved CD4 cellular immune response in patients treated with chemotherapy (7, 8, 13) or CD19-CAR T-cells (14). Regarding CTL response, a study (9) reported comparable amounts of CD8 that recognize HLA class 1 combined with SARS-CoV-2 peptides in patients recently treated for lymphoma. Here, we used a more functional approach measuring the perforin and granzyme response to Spike Protein. CD8 and B cell responses require functional CD4 T-cells (15), and we detected a high frequency of exhaustion markers expressed on CD4 T cells during antitumor treatment, suggesting a dysfunctional state that may affect the humoral response after vaccination in some cases.

In this cohort, we did not observe any specific impact of bendamustine or the use of anti-CD20 alone versus in combination with chemotherapy agents, which may be due to a small sampling. Despite a heterogeneity in the timing of vaccinal response evaluation, we found no significant effect of time since last vaccination on response in patients. Similarly, the occurrence of a COVID-19 infection had no impact on serological and cellular response in this cohort.

Taken together, those results confirm that the cellular helper and cytotoxic response is preserved but that the serological response is poor when the vaccination program is performed during or just after antitumor treatment. They argue for a vaccination program completed before its initiation and a booster injection after its completion.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Méditerranée II on september 3rd, 2021. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

SL: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. HC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Md: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. LF: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. BD: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. CJ: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. FM: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MK: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. FQ: Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. AJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SC: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. RD: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YT: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. CB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was carried out with the institutional support of Roche.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Centre Hospitalier de Versailles for editorial assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1524813/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Duléry R, Lamure S, Delord M, Di Blasi R, Chauchet A, Hueso T, et al. Prolonged in-hospital stay and higher mortality after Covid-19 among patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with B-cell depleting immunotherapy. Am J Hematol. (2021) 96:934–44. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26209

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kohn M, Alsuliman T, Lamure S, Cheminant M, Delage J, Boever CMD, et al. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients during the Omicron outbreak. Leuk Ampmathsemicolon Lymphoma. (2022) 63:1–5. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2086249

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Salmanton-García J, Marchesi F, Farina F, Weinbergerová B, Itri F, Dávila-Valls J, et al. Decoding the historical tale: COVID-19 impact on haematological Malignancy patients—EPICOVIDEHA insights from 2020 to 2022. eClinicalMedicine. (2024) 71. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102553

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yang LM, Costales C, Ramanathan M, Bulterys PL, Murugesan K, Schroers-Martin J, et al. Cellular and humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and booster dose in immunosuppressed patients: An observational cohort study. J Clin Virol. (2022) 153:105217. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105217

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gressens SB, Wiedemann A, Déchenaud M, Dupuis J, Gallien S, Melica G, et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 cellular response after 2 and 3 doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in lymphoma patients receiving anti-CD20 antibodies. Vaccine. (2023) 41:1550–3. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Keppler-Hafkemeyer A, Greil C, Wratil PR, Shoumariyeh K, Stern M, Hafkemeyer A, et al. Potent high-avidity neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses after COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Nat Cancer. (2023) 4:81–95. doi: 10.1038/s43018-022-00502-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Pfannes R, Pierzchalski A, Maddalon A, Simion A, Zouboulis CC, Behre G, et al. Characterization of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 T cell subtypes in patients with different hematologic Malignancies and treatments. Front Immunol. (2023) 14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1087996

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Beaton B, Sasson SC, Rankin K, Raedemaeker J, Wong A, Hastak P, et al. Patients with treated indolent lymphomas immunized with BNT162b2 have reduced anti-spike neutralizing IgG to SARS-CoV-2 variants, but preserved antigen-specific T cell responses. Am J Hematol. (2023) 98:131–9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Riise J, Meyer S, Blaas I, Chopra A, Tran TT, Delic-Sarac M, et al. Rituximab-treated patients with lymphoma develop strong CD8 T-cell responses following COVID-19 vaccination. Br J Haematol. (2022) 197:697–708. doi: 10.1111/bjh.v197.6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Anolik JH, Friedberg JW, Zheng B, Barnard J, Owen T, Cushing E, et al. B cell reconstitution after rituximab treatment of lymphoma recapitulates B cell ontogeny. Clin Immunol. (2007) 122:139–45. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2006.08.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mamani-Matsuda M, Cosma A, Weller S, Faili A, Staib C, Garçon L, et al. The human spleen is a major reservoir for long-lived vaccinia virus-specific memory B cells. Blood. (2008) 111:4653–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-123844

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Nishikubo M, Shimomura Y, Maruoka H, Nasu S, Nishioka T, Sakizono K, et al. Humoral response and safety of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in patients with haematological diseases treated with anti-CD20 antibodies: An observational study. Br J Haematol. (2022) 197:709–13. doi: 10.1111/bjh.v197.6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Vanni A, Salvati L, Mazzoni A, Lamacchia G, Capone M, Francalanci S, et al. Bendamustine impairs humoral but not cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in rituximab-treated B-cell lymphoma–affected patients. Front Immunol. (2023) 14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1322594

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Atanackovic D, Luetkens T, Omili D, Iraguha T, Lutfi F, Hardy NM, et al. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 and its Omicron variant in patients with B cell-depleted lymphoma after CART therapy. Blood. (2022) 140:152–6. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016175

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Provine NM, Larocca RA, Aid M, Penaloza-MacMaster P, Badamchi-Zadeh A, Borducchi EN, et al. Immediate dysfunction of vaccine-elicited CD8+ T cells primed in the absence of CD4+ T cells. J Immunol Author Choice. (2016) 197:1809–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600591

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine, lymphoma, immune response, anti-CD20, chemotherapy

Citation: Lamure S, Chavez HH, de Goër de Herve M-G, Fornecker L-M, Drenou B, Jacquet C, Merabet F, Kohn M, Quélin F, Jackson A, Choquet S, Duléry R, Taoufik Y and Besson C (2025) Lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD20 and chemotherapy display disconnected T and B cell responses to COVID-19 vaccine. Front. Immunol. 15:1524813. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1524813

Received: 09 November 2024; Accepted: 26 December 2024;
Published: 20 January 2025.

Edited by:

Ritthideach Yorsaeng, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

Reviewed by:

Anna Vanni, University of Florence, Italy
Alessandro Campanella, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy

Copyright © 2025 Lamure, Chavez, de Goër de Herve, Fornecker, Drenou, Jacquet, Merabet, Kohn, Quélin, Jackson, Choquet, Duléry, Taoufik and Besson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Caroline Besson, Y2Fyb2xpbmUuYmVzc29uQHV2c3EuZnI=; Yassine Taoufik, eWFzc2luZS50YW91ZmlrQGFwaHAuZnI=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more