Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 23 December 2024
Sec. Molecular Innate Immunity
This article is part of the Research Topic Role of Endogenous Regulators of Innate Immunity in Sepsis View all articles

Connexin 43 and Pannexin 1 hemichannels as endogenous regulators of innate immunity in sepsis

  • 1The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction resulting from a dysregulated host response to infections that is initiated by the body’s innate immune system. Nearly a decade ago, we discovered that bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and serum amyloid A (SAA) upregulated Connexin 43 (Cx43) and Pannexin 1 (Panx1) hemichannels in macrophages. When overexpressed, these hemichannels contribute to sepsis pathogenesis by promoting ATP efflux, which intensifies the double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase R (PKR)-dependent inflammasome activation, pyroptosis, and the release of pathogenic damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecules, such as HMGB1. Mimetic peptides targeting specific regions of Cx43 and Panx1 can distinctly modulate hemichannel activity in vitro, and diversely impact sepsis-induced lethality in vivo. Along with extensive supporting evidence from others, we now propose that hemichannel molecules play critical roles as endogenous regulators of innate immunity in sepsis.

Introduction

Microbial infections and resultant sepsis account for nearly 20% of deaths worldwide (1), and annually cost over $60 billion in healthcare in the U.S. alone. Despite the urgent need, effective therapies remain elusive, as setbacks in sepsis clinical trials have dampened enthusiasm for both preclinical investigation of complex sepsis pathophysiology and clinical development of innovative sepsis therapies. However, prior pre-clinical studies of pathogenic cytokines (e.g., TNF) in inflammatory diseases (2) have led to the Nobel Prize -Winning anti-TNF therapies for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (3, 4), inspiring an improved understanding of the complex pathogenic mechanism of sepsis. As a multifactorial disorder, sepsis is initiated by the innate immune system, the body’s first line of defense against microbial infections (5, 6).

Monocytes, originating from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow, circulate continuously in the bloodstream to search for invading pathogens or damaged tissues. Upon detecting pathogen- or damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs or DAMPs), they infiltrate affected tissues and differentiate into resident macrophages (7, 8). Macrophages and monocytes are equipped with various pattern recognition receptors (PRR) such as the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and TLR9 (911) to detect PAMPs, including bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and CpG-DNA (12, 13). For instance, upon encountering small amounts of LPS, an LPS-binding protein (LBP) (14) aids in its delivery to a co-receptor, cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) (15), which then presents it to TLR4 (10). This interaction rapidly initiates the release of “early” proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (2), interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (16) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (17). While early cytokine responses can be protective against microbial infections (1821), excessive cytokine production (e.g., TNF) can contribute to the pathogenesis of sepsis (22) and septic shock (2). Despite attempts to neutralize TNF in clinical settings, therapeutic windows for early cytokines are narrow, motivating the search for “late” mediators that may provide broader therapeutic opportunities in treating lethal infections. In 1999, we discovered that high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) was released by endotoxin-stimulated macrophages and monocytes, and functioned as a late mediator of lethal endotoxemia (23). In animal models of lethal sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), circulating HMGB1 levels peaked between 24-36 hours (24). Pharmacological inhibition of HMGB1 with neutralizing antibodies conferred protection against lethal sepsis, even when administered 24 hours post-CLP (24, 25), establishing HMGB1 as a “late” mediator of sepsis with a broader therapeutic window (2630).

Role of inflammasome activation in the regulation of HMGB1 release

Lacking a signal sequence, HMGB1 cannot be secreted through the classical Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) - Golgi exocytotic pathways (23). Instead, inflammatory stimuli promoted HMGB1 acetylation (31), lactylation (31) or phosphorylation (32, 33), facilitating its translocation to cytoplasmic vesicles and secretion through non-classical exosomal secretory pathways (31, 3437). In addition, HMGB1 can be passively released via pyroptosis (Figure 1) (38, 39), a programmed necrotic cell death pathway mediated by Casp-1-dependent canonical and Casp-11/4/5-dependent non-canonical inflammasome activation pathways (40).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Proposed roles of Cx43 and Panx1 hemichannels in regulating ATP release and inflammasome activation. Prolonged exposure to crude LPS or SAA induced upregulation of Cx43 and Panx1 hemichannels, potentially contributing to extracellular ATP efflux, P2X7R-mediated PKR phosphorylation, pyroptosis, and the release of DAMPs such as HMGB1. Concurrently, PKR activation led to increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and parallel production of nitric oxide (NO) in macrophage cultures.

Accumulative evidence has supported the critical role of inflammasome activation in regulating LPS/ATP-induced HMGB1 release, as genetic disruption of key inflammasome components like Casp-1 or Nalp3 significantly impairs this process (41). Additionally, the double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase R (PKR) has been identified as a key regulator of inflammasome activation and HMGB1 release (Figure 1) (42). Genetic deletion of PKR expression or pharmacological inhibition of its phosphorylation similarly disrupts inflammasome activation, pyroptosis, and HMGB1 release (42, 43). Notably, bacterial toxins are believed to activate inflammasome signaling pathways partly by triggering passive ATP leakage (44). Indeed, ultrapure LPS, free of contaminating bacterial proteins and nucleic acids, can induce early cytokine production (e.g., TNF), but cannot trigger nitric oxide (NO) production and HMGB1 secretion unless the LPS priming is accompanied by a second stimulus, ATP (41, 42, 45, 46). Similarly, while ATP itself can induce PKR phosphorylation (42), it cannot independently trigger the release of HMGB1 or other inflammasome-dependent cytokines (e.g., IL-1β and IL-18) without prior LPS priming (41, 4749).

Role of extracellular ATP in the regulation of inflammasome activation

Extracellular ATP is believed to activate the inflammasome by binding to the purinergic P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) (50), which rapidly opens the ATP-gated P2X7R channel, permitting the influx of small cationic ions. This activation subsequently recruits and activates connexin 43 (Cx43) and pannexin 1 (Panx1) hemichannels (Figure 1), allowing the passage of larger anionic molecules up to 900 Da, including ATP (5153). This ATP-mediated, feed-forward release of ATP amplifies LPS-stimulated inflammasome activation (54) and subsequent release of inflammasome-dependent cytokines (e.g., IL-1β and IL-18) (4749, 55).

Our previous work demonstrated that both crude LPS and purified SAA upregulated the expression of Cx43 and Panx1 hemichannels in macrophage cultures (56, 57), and effectively induced PKR-dependent inflammasome activation and HMGB1 release (Figure 1) (56). Connexins and pannexins are transmembrane proteins that form hemichannels on the surface of monocytes and macrophages. When hemichannels from neighboring cells align, they can create a gap junction (GJ), enabling direct exchange of ions, small molecules, and signaling molecules between the cytoplasm of adjacent cells. However, hemichannels also exist in an unpaired state on the cell surface, typically remaining closed in quiescent cells to prevent uncontrolled release of intracellular contents. In response to inflammatory signals, however, these hemichannels can open, allowing ions and small molecules—such as ATP—to pass between the intracellular and extracellular spaces. Among hemichannel proteins, Cx43 and Panx1 are the most extensively studied, especially in macrophages and monocytes, where they play critical roles in regulating immune activation and cytokine production.

In light of our observation that a hemichannel blocker, carbenoxolone (CBX), dose-dependently inhibited both endotoxin- and SAA-induced PKR activation and HMGB1 release (56, 58, 59), we proposed that hemichannel molecules like Cx43 and Panx1 may play important roles in regulating the release of ATP, which intensifies inflammatory responses through PKR-dependent inflammasome activation, pyroptosis, and HMGB1 release (Figure 1). Below we discuss the distinct and shared roles of Cx43 and Panx1 in modulating innate immunity during sepsis, emphasizing their tissue-specific contributions to inflammation and sepsis progression.

Role of Cx43 as an endogenous regulator of innate immunity in sepsis

Cx43, a member of the connexin family, is widely expressed in innate immune cells such as monocytes (60) and macrophages (61). In sepsis, Cx43 forms unpaired hemichannels that enable the release of signaling molecules, such as ATP, into the extracellular space, thereby amplifying innate immune responses.

Up-regulation of Cx43

To investigate the potential role of Cx43 hemichannel in regulating innate immunity, we measured Cx43 expression in wild-type and TLR4-deficient macrophages after prolonged stimulation with crude endotoxins or highly purified human serum amyloid A (SAA) (56). While quiescent macrophages constitutively expressed Cx43 at relative low levels, exposure to crude LPS and SAA resulted in a marked increase in Cx43 expression (by 45-60 folds) in wild-type, but not in the TLR4-deficient macrophages, suggesting that LPS and SAA induced Cx43 expression in a TLR4-dependent fashion (Figure 1) (56). Our findings were consistent with previous studies showing that bacterial endotoxins and proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF and IFN-γ) up-regulated Cx43 expression in macrophages/monocytes (60, 62) and Kupffer cells (63). Given the expression of Cx43 in Kupffer cells (63)—the liver’s resident macrophages that play a crucial role in mediating hepatic immune responses—it is plausible that Cx43 may also play a significant role in regulating inflammasome activation in these cells. Indeed, inflammatory stimuli such as LPS or heat stroke have been shown to induce NLRP3-dependent inflammasome activation in Kupffer cells, thereby contributing to inflammatory hepatic injury (6367). Recently, these findings are further supported by studies showing that LPS increased Cx43 expression (68, 69), stimulated ATP release (68), increased NLRP3 inflammasome activation (70), and contributed to septic lethality (68). In light of the notion that diabetes and hyperglycemia are frequently linked to poorer outcomes in experimental (71, 72) and clinical (7375) sepsis, high glucose levels have also been shown to amplify cytokine-induced Cx43 expression, ATP release, and NLRP3 activation (76).

In vivo, endotoxin increases Cx43 expression in the lungs and kidneys (77), but transiently decrease it in the heart (78) (Table 1). The mechanisms underlying the tissue-specific regulation of Cx43 expression by endotoxins are not yet understood and remain an intriguing avenue for future investigation. Additionally, Cx43 was found to be upregulated in macrophages cultures by endotoxins and cytokines (56, 60, 62) or septic insults in animals or patients with experimental or clinical peritonitis (68). Conversely, conditional knockout of Cx43 specifically in macrophages reduce LPS-induced ATP release and inflammation in animal models of lethal endotoxemia and CLP sepsis, resulting in improved survival rates (68). Furthermore, genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of Cx43 conferred protection against CLP-induced intestinal (79) and lung injury (80), as well as against high-fat diet (HFD)-induced inflammasome activation and inflammation (81), chronic colitis (82), and tubular inflammatory injury (83). Collectively, these findings underscore the compartmentalized regulation of Cx43 during sepsis and suggest that selectively inhibiting Cx43 hemichannels may serve as a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce inflammation in specific tissues.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Divergent regulation of Cx43 and Panx1 expression in sepsis.

Role of Cx43 in the regulation of ATP release

Almost two decades ago, it was proposed that Cx43 hemichannels play a crucial role in facilitating the release of ATP (84), which acts as a pro-inflammatory signal by activating purinergic receptors on adjacent immune cells. In innate immune cells such as macrophages, Cx43 exists predominantly in the form of hemichannels that connect cell interior to extracellular milieu (44, 85, 86). Conditional knockout of Cx43 in lung macrophages led to a significant reduction in ATP release and a diminished calcium response to bleomycin-induced injury (61). Therefore, macrophage Cx43 hemichannel-mediated ATP release is essential for inflammasome activation, and the release of DAMPs (e.g., HMGB1, Figure 1) or other inflammasome-dependent cytokines (such as IL-1β and IL-18).

Divergent effects of Cx43 mimetic peptides on hemichannel activation and sepsis outcomes

Cx43 carries four transmembrane domains that encompass two extracellular loops (ELs), one intracellular cytoplasmic loop, and the intracellular N- and C-termini (Figure 2A) (87). The cytoplasmic membrane-bound Cx43 can oligomerize to form hexameric hemichannels (Figure 2B) (88), which can dock with hemichannels on adjacent cells to create gap junction (GJ) channels, particularly in non-immune cells of the heart, brain, and vasculature, facilitating intercellular communication (89, 90). Since innate immune cells do not form GJ with one another (86), the upregulation of Cx43 expression may lead to increased hemichannel activity. To explore this, we assessed changes in hemichannel activity using Cx43 mimetic peptides, including GAP26, which corresponds to sequence of the first extracellular loop (EL1) of Cx43 (Figure 2A) (91), and GAP19 (Figure 2A), derived from a nine-residue segment of the cytoplasmic loop of Cx43 (92). Under calcium-depleted conditions, LPS significantly increased Cx43 hemichannel activity, which was distinctly influenced by pre-incubation with GAP26 and TAT-GAP19 (56). Consequently, these two different Cx43 mimetic peptides, GAP26 and TAT-GAP19, had different effects on LPS-induced hemichannel activation in vitro, and varied impacts on the outcomes of lethal sepsis in vivo (56).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Amino acid sequence and structural domains of human Cx43 and Panx1. (A) highlights various mimetic peptides that correspond to specific regions within the extracellular or cytoplasmic loops of Cx43 or Panx1 protein. (B) presents the three-dimensional structures of Cx43 and Panx1 hemichannels, including the Panx1 variant lacking the C-terminal tail (ΔPanx1).

To further investigate the potential role of Cx43 hemichannels in sepsis, we synthesized a series of hexamer peptides overlapping with the first extracellular loop (EL1) of Cx43 and screened them for their ability to modulate macrophage hemichannel activities. Among these, the cysteine-containing peptide P5 (ENVCYD, Figure 2A) significantly inhibited LPS-induced increase in hemichannel activity, as evidenced by a marked reduction in cellular lucifer yellow dye uptake (56). Additionally, the P5 peptide significantly diminished LPS-induced ATP release and trypan blue uptake, indicating its effectiveness in impairing the LPS-mediated elevation of hemichannel activity, cell death and HMGB1 release (56). It is thus possible that crude LPS- and SAA-induced Cx43 upregulation and hemichannel activation may contribute to the efflux of ATP, which activates the purinergic P2X7R to mediate PKR phosphorylation and HMGB1 secretion (Figure 1). Furthermore, mimetic peptides such as GAP26 and P5 (ENVCYD) may hold potential as therapeutic agents for the clinical treatment of human sepsis (56).

Role of Cx43 in innate immune cell communication with non-immune cells

Cx43 hexameric hemichannels can dock with the hemichannels on adjacent cells to form GJ channels to facilitate intercellular communications in various tissues such as the heart, brain, and vasculature (85, 89, 90). Under inflammatory conditions, macrophages form Cx43-containing GJ channel with cardiomyocytes (93), epithelial cells (94), and endothelial cells (62), suggesting an exciting possibility that innate immune cells may communicate with non-immune cells through Cx43-containing GJ channels to orchestrate inflammatory responses. For instance, a subset of alveolar macrophages form Cx43-containing gap junctions with the lung epithelial cells, allowing them to communicate during LPS-induced inflammation (94). This intercommunication resulted in a reduction of neutrophil recruitment and cytokine secretion, thereby serving as a novel immunomodulatory mechanism. Similarly, macrophage and lymphocytes can both express Cx43 and can potentially form GJ channels between innate and adaptive immune cells (95), suggesting a possible role of GJ-mediated communication in immune regulation. Additionally, Cx43 has been implicated in the formation of tunneling nanotubes (96, 97), long membranous channels that can transfer organelles and signaling molecules between immune cells to facilitate intercellular communication over long distances. The Cx43-mediated transfer of cellular contents is especially important during viral infections, as rapid cellular communication is essential for mounting effective inflammatory responses.

Role of Pannexin 1 as an endogenous regulator of innate immunity in sepsis

Pannexins, originally identified in flatworms as innexin-like membrane channels, also form hexameric hemichannels in vertebrates that similarly enable ATP release (98100). The Pannexin (Panx) family comprises three members: Panx1, which is widely expressed across diverse tissues; Panx2, primarily restricted to the central nervous system (CNS); and Panx3, predominantly found in skin and skeletal tissues (101).

Regulation of Panx1 expression and processing

Panx1 is constitutively expressed in quiescent monocytes and macrophages typically at low levels. Exposure to crude LPS or purified SAA markedly elevated Panx1 protein levels in macrophages and monocytes, evidenced by increased Panx1-specific punctate staining in the cytoplasm (57). This finding aligns with prior reports that Panx1 hemichannel expression in microglia was upregulated by proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-1, and IFN-γ (101). Under non-inflammatory conditions, Panx1 hemichannels remain closed, with the C-terminal tail physically plugging the hemichannel pore from the cytoplasmic side. Upon exposure to inflammatory stimuli, caspase activation can result in the cleavage of the C-terminal tail (102, 103), leading to gradual opening of Panx1 hemichannels and the release of larger molecules like ATP (104, 105). This extracellular ATP acts as an essential danger and “find me” signal (104), attracting innate immune cells to sites of tissue injury or infection, and binding P2X7 receptor to trigger inflammasome activation (51, 103), pyroptosis (106), and the release of HMGB1 (107) and other inflammasome-dependent cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18 (108110). Thus, the Panx1-mediated ATP release also plays an important role in promoting innate immune cell chemotaxis (111), inflammasome activation (112), pyroptosis (103, 113), and the inflammatory response (Figure 1) (114116).

Additionally, we observed that both crude LPS and human SAA induced Panx1 release in macrophage cultures (57). This extracellular release of Panx1 was accompanied by the appearance of a lower molecular weight band (12 kDa), detected by a monoclonal antibody specific to the C-terminus of Panx1, suggesting it as a possible degradation product of Panx1. This finding aligns with subsequent report that LPS triggered Casp-11-mediated cleavage of the Panx1 hemichannel in macrophage cultures (103).

While Cx43 and Panx1 share roles in mediating ATP release and promoting inflammation, they display distinct regulatory mechanisms and tissue-specific expression patterns during sepsis. As aforementioned, endotoxin has been shown to reduce Cx43 expression in the heart (78), while increasing it in the kidney and lung (77). In contrast, Panx1 mRNA expression was markedly upregulated in the heart but downregulated in the kidney, lung, and spleen of septic animals (57) (Table 1). These findings not only confirm the widespread tissue distribution of Panx1, but also suggest that distinct hemichannel proteins, such as Cx43 and Panx1, are differentially regulated during experimental sepsis. The parallel decrease in circulating Panx1 protein levels and its mRNA expression in macrophage-rich organs, such as the lungs and spleen, suggested that these tissues may contribute to systemic Panx1 accumulation under normal conditions (57).

Role of Panx1 in the regulation of ATP release

Almost two decades ago, Panx1 was proposed as a signaling molecule essential for Casp-1 processing (117), inflammasome activation, and consequent release of ATP (118) and inflammasome-dependent cytokines (e.g. IL-1β) (51, 109). Subsequently, Panx1 was also identified as a channel for intracellular delivery of muramyl dipeptide, a small molecular component of bacterial peptidoglycan, to trigger Casp-1- and NLRP3-dependent inflammasome activation (119). Beyond inflammasome activation, Panx1 channels also contribute to innate immune cell apoptosis and the release of apoptotic metabolites as signaling molecules (120). For example, Panx1 hemichannels facilitate ATP release from apoptotic cells, guiding macrophages to clear apoptotic bodies (120). This release is triggered by caspase-mediated cleavage of the C-terminal inhibitory domain (102, 120), propelled via an autocrine loop of P2X7 receptor activation (51, 103), and further amplified by Panx1 hemichannel opening (121).

Role of Panx1 in non-immune cells

Panx1 hemichannels have also been implicated in inflammasome activation in non-immune cells including airway epithelial cells (122), neurons (112), astrocytes (112), and endothelial cells (107). In endothelial cells, Panx1 similarly serves as a channel for ATP release, which activates macrophages through P2X7 receptors, promoting the release of IL-1β and HMGB1 (107). Recently, an Panx1-mediated communication circuit between epithelial cells and macrophages has also been proposed as crucial for promoting epithelial regeneration after injury (123). Suppressing Panx1 expression in epithelial cells with lentivirus-mediated shRNA (122) significantly reduced hypotonic stress-induced ATP release, supporting an important role of Panx1 hemichannels in mediating ATP release in non-immune cells.

Roles of Panx1 in sepsis and other inflammatory diseases

In animal models of sepsis, Panx1 expression exhibits tissue-specific regulation, with upregulation observed in certain tissues like the heart and downregulation in others, such as the lung and spleen (57) (Table 1). This differential regulation of Panx1 expression suggests its tissue-dependent roles in sepsis and other inflammatory diseases. For example, Panx1 has been shown to exacerbate the inflammatory response in animal models of sepsis by promoting the excessive release of ATP, thereby enhancing innate immune cell recruitment and activation. Inhibition of Panx1 conferred protection against sepsis-associated encephalopathy and mortality (113, 124). However, genetic disruption of Panx1 expression rendered animals resistant to lethal endotoxemia (103), but impaired inflammation-mediated microbial clearance (109) and ultimately worsened the outcome of lethal sepsis (125). Similarly, liver-specific knockout of Panx1 also worsened the outcome of lethal endotoxemia (126), suggesting that Panx1 may still be needed for mounting potentially protective innate immune responses against lethal bacterial infections.

The 10Panx, a synthetic peptide that mimics a sequence (WRQAAFVDSY) in the first extracellular loop of Panx1 (Figure 2A), is known to inhibit Panx1 hemichannel-mediated ATP release and inflammasome activation in microglia (127) and neurons (51, 128). The administration of 10Panx has been shown to reduce inflammasome activation and attenuate the severity of inflammation in animal models of brain ischemic injury (129), liver toxemia (130, 131), neuropathic pain (132), and epilepsy (133). However, we observed that 10Panx consistently worsened CLP-induced animal lethality, especially when administered at relatively lower doses (10–50 mg/kg) (57). This detrimental effect of 10Panx was associated with an enhancement of the LPS- or SAA-induced hemichannel activation, ATP release and NO production (57). Our finding aligns with the critical role of ATP in PKR-dependent inflammasome activation (42, 59, 103) and NO synthesis (46, 134136), enforcing the notion that excessive macrophage Panx1 hemichannel activation may contribute to the pathogenesis of lethal systemic inflammation (116). Our finding was also consistent with a previous report that 10Panx did not inhibit macrophage hemichannel activities at a relatively lower concentration (e.g., 100 µM) (137).

Clinical applicability of Cx43- and Panx1-targeting mimetic peptides

Macrophage hemichannel molecules, such as Cx43 and Panx1, have emerged as pivotal regulators of ATP release, which amplifies innate immune responses in conditions such as sepsis, rheumatoid arthritis, and other inflammatory diseases. Mimetic peptides targeting these hemichannels represent a promising class of therapeutics, offering the potential to selectively modulate macrophage-mediated inflammation. By mimicking endogenous regulatory motifs, these peptides can inhibit pathological hemichannel opening without broadly suppressing innate immune function. This precision allows for effective treatment of diseases characterized by excessive inflammation, such as sepsis and autoimmune disorders, while preserving essential innate immune response required for host defense. Beyond systemic inflammation, hemichannels are also implicated in a range of other conditions, including ischemia-reperfusion injury and neuroinflammation. Mimetic peptides targeting these channels could thus serve as versatile agents for multiple indications, particularly when combining with existing anti-inflammatory agents (e.g., cytokine inhibitors) that could provide synergistic effects. A significant advantage of mimetic peptides lies in their derivation from endogenous proteins, which reduces the risk of immunogenicity and adverse reactions compared to synthetic drugs. This feature enhances their tolerability and facilitates regulatory approval, making them an attractive option for clinical development.

Challenges in developing mimetic peptides

Despite their promise, the clinical development of mimetic peptides faces several major hurdles. For instance, mimetic peptides often suffer from poor stability in vivo due to enzymatic degradation and rapid clearance. Thus, developing stable formulations or introducing structural modifications, such as peptide cyclization or pegylation, is essential to improve their half-life. Additionally, achieving effective delivery to target macrophages in specific tissues remains challenging, particularly for systemic inflammatory diseases where broad biodistribution may dilute their efficacy. While hemichannels are a promising target, Cx43 and Panx1 are ubiquitously expressed in various tissues, including the heart and nervous system. The potentially non-specific inhibition of these channels could result in unintended side effects, such as impaired cardiac conduction or neuronal signaling. Thus, designing peptides with macrophage-specific activity or achieving tissue-specific delivery is essential to avoid these complications. Furthermore, mimetic peptides often exhibit variable pharmacokinetics, complicating dosing strategies. Identifying the appropriate dosing regimen to achieve sustained therapeutic levels without toxicity is a key challenge, especially for conditions like sepsis, where timing is critical. Additionally, obtaining regulatory approval for peptide-based therapies is inherently complex, as these agents often straddle the boundary between small molecules and biologics, requiring comprehensive preclinical testing to demonstrate their safety, efficacy, and manufacturability. Finally, although mimetic peptides are derived from endogenous proteins, modifications to enhance stability or efficacy could inadvertently increase their immunogenic potential, thereby interfering with the efficacy of mimetic peptide therapy.

Strategies to overcome challenges

To address these challenges, a multidisciplinary approach is needed, such as peptide engineering to incorporate chemical modifications, such as non-natural amino acids or conjugation to delivery vehicles to enhance stability and specificity. Additionally, targeted delivery systems such as nanoparticles, liposomes, or antibody-drug conjugates can be employed to localize peptides to macrophages, thereby minimizing off-target effects and enhancing therapeutic concentration at the disease site. Similarly, combinational therapies of several mimetic peptides as adjuncts to existing treatments (e.g., cytokine inhibitors) can enhance efficacy while mitigating risks. Thus, mimetic peptides targeting macrophage hemichannel molecules hold significant potential as novel therapeutics for inflammatory diseases. Their specificity, versatility, and potential for synergy with existing therapies highlight their clinical applicability. However, challenges related to stability, specificity, and immunogenicity must be addressed to ensure successful translation into clinical practice. Through advancements in peptide engineering, targeted delivery systems, and preclinical validation, these obstacles can be surmounted, paving the way for innovative and effective treatments for inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases.

Conclusions

Cx43 and Panx1 hemichannels play critical roles in regulating innate immunity during sepsis partly by mediating the release of ATP and other inflammatory signals. Although both hemichannels amplify innate immune responses, their contributions are tissue-specific and disease context-dependent. In septic conditions, Cx43 expression increases in the lung and kidney but decreases in the heart, whereas Panx1 expression is elevated in the heart but reduced in the lung and spleen (Table 1). This complex regulation of Cx43 and Panx1 suggests that selective targeting of these hemichannels may offer therapeutic potential for controlling systemic inflammation in tissue-specific fashion. Various inhibitors of Cx43 and Panx1 have shown promise in modulating inflammation across sepsis and other disease models. However, caution is warranted when using mimetic peptides to influence macrophage hemichannel activities, as effects can vary with dose regimens and experimental conditions. Therefore, additional research is necessary to fully elucidate these hemichannels’ multifaceted roles during different phases of sepsis and to develop effective hemichannel-targeted therapies for this devastating condition.

Author contributions

JL: Writing – original draft. LL: Writing – original draft. WC: Writing – review & editing. XQ: Writing – review & editing. CZ: Writing – review & editing. HW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Research in our laboratory was partly supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01AT005076 and R35GM145331.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. (2020) 395:200–11.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

2. Tracey KJ, Fong Y, Hesse DG, Manogue KR, Lee AT, Kuo GC, et al. Anti-cachectin/tnf monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia. Nature. (1987) 330:662–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

3. Alldred A. Etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. (2001) 2:1137–48.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

4. Feldmann M, Maini RN. Anti-tnf alpha therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned? Annu Rev Immunol. (2001) 19:163–96.

Google Scholar

5. Delano MJ, Ward PA. Sepsis-induced immune dysfunction: can immune therapies reduce mortality? J Clin Invest. (2016) 126:23–31.

Google Scholar

6. Tindal EW, Armstead BE, Monaghan SF, Heffernan DS, Ayala A. Emerging therapeutic targets for sepsis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. (2021) 25:175–89. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2021.1897107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Rouhiainen A, Kuja-Panula J, Wilkman E, Pakkanen J, Stenfors J, Tuominen RK, et al. Regulation of monocyte migration by amphoterin (Hmgb1). Blood. (2004) 104:1174–82.

Google Scholar

8. Grabstein KH, Urdal DL, Tushinski RJ, Mochizuki DY, Price VL, Cantrell MA, et al. Induction of macrophage tumoricidal activity by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Science. (1986) 232:506–8.

Google Scholar

9. Brightbill HD, Libraty DH, Krutzik SR, Yang RB, Belisle JT, Bleharski JR, et al. Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through toll-like receptors. Science. (1999) 285:732–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

10. Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Huffel CV, Du X, et al. Defective lps signaling in C3h/hej and C57bl/10sccr mice: mutations in tlr4 gene. Science. (1998) 282:2085–8.

Google Scholar

11. Hemmi H, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Kaisho T, Sato S, Sanjo H, et al. A toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature. (2000) 408:740–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

12. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. (2004) 4:499–511.

Google Scholar

13. Baggiolini M, Loetscher P. Chemokines in inflammation and immunity. Immunol Today. (2000) 21:418–20.

Google Scholar

14. Hailman E, Lichenstein HS, Wurfel MM, Miller DS, Johnson DA, Kelley M, et al. Lipopolysaccharide (Lps)-binding protein accelerates the binding of lps to cd14. J Exp Med. (1994) 179:269–77.

Google Scholar

15. Wright SD, Ramos RA, Tobias PS, Ulevitch RJ, Mathison JC. Cd14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (Lps) and lps binding protein. Science. (1990) 249:1431–3.

Google Scholar

16. Dinarello CA. Biologic basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood. (1996) 87:2095–147.

Google Scholar

17. Heinzel FP. The role of ifn-gamma in the pathology of experimental endotoxemia. J Immunol. (1990) 145:2920–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

18. Remick D, Manohar P, Bolgos G, Rodriguez J, Moldawer L, Wollenberg G. Blockade of tumor necrosis factor reduces lipopolysaccharide lethality, but not the lethality of cecal ligation and puncture. Shock. (1995) 4:89–95.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Havell EA. Production of tumor necrosis factor during murine listeriosis. J Immunol. (1987) 139:4225–31.

Google Scholar

20. Chen W, Havell EA, Harmsen AG. Importance of endogenous tumor necrosis factor alpha and gamma interferon in host resistance against pneumocystis carinii infection. Infect Immun. (1992) 60:1279–84. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.4.1279-1284.1992

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Havell EA. Evidence that tumor necrosis factor has an important role in antibacterial resistance. J Immunol. (1989) 143:2894–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Osuchowski MF, Welch K, Siddiqui J, Remick DG. Circulating cytokine/inhibitor profiles reshape the understanding of the sirs/cars continuum in sepsis and predict mortality. J Immunol. (2006) 177:1967–74.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

23. Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, Vishnubhakat JM, Ombrellino M, Che J, et al. Hmg-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science. (1999) 285:248–51.

Google Scholar

24. Yang H, Ochani M, Li J, Qiang X, Tanovic M, Harris HE, et al. Reversing established sepsis with antagonists of endogenous high-mobility group box 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2004) 101:296–301.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

25. Qin S, Wang H, Yuan R, Li H, Ochani M, Ochani K, et al. Role of hmgb1 in apoptosis-mediated sepsis lethality. J Exp Med. (2006) 203:1637–42.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Wang H, Yang H, Tracey KJ. Extracellular role of hmgb1 in inflammation and sepsis. J Intern Med. (2004) 255:320–31.

Google Scholar

27. Wang H, Yang H, Czura CJ, Sama AE, Tracey KJ. Hmgb1 as a late mediator of lethal systemic inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2001) 164:1768–73.

Google Scholar

28. Wang H, Zhu S, Zhou R, Li W, Sama AE. Therapeutic potential of hmgb1-targeting agents in sepsis. Expert Rev Mol Med. (2008) 10:e32.

Google Scholar

29. Wang H, Ward MF, Sama AE. Novel hmgb1-inhibiting therapeutic agents for experimental sepsis. Shock. (2009) 32:348–57.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Li J, Zhu CS, He L, Qiang X, Chen W, Wang H. A two-decade journey in identifying high mobility group box 1 (Hmgb1) and procathepsin L (Pcts-L) as potential therapeutic targets for sepsis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. (2023) 27:575–91. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2023.2239495

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Yang K, Fan M, Wang X, Xu J, Wang Y, Tu F, et al. Lactate promotes macrophage hmgb1 lactylation, acetylation, and exosomal release in polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Death Differ. (2022) 29:133–46. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00841-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lu B, Antoine DJ, Kwan K, Lundback P, Wahamaa H, Schierbeck H, et al. Jak/stat1 signaling promotes hmgb1 hyperacetylation and nuclear translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2014) 111:3068–73.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

33. Youn JH, Shin JS. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of hmgb1 is regulated by phosphorylation that redirects it toward secretion. J Immunol. (2006) 177:7889–97.

Google Scholar

34. Rendon-Mitchell B, Ochani M, Li J, Han J, Wang H, Yang H, et al. Ifn-gamma induces high mobility group box 1 protein release partly through a tnf-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. (2003) 170:3890–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Gardella S, Andrei C, Ferrera D, Lotti LV, Torrisi MR, Bianchi ME, et al. The nuclear protein hmgb1 is secreted by monocytes via a non-classical, vesicle-mediated secretory pathway. EMBO Rep. (2002) 3:955–1001.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

36. Bonaldi T, Talamo F, Scaffidi P, Ferrera D, Porto A, Bachi A, et al. Monocytic cells hyperacetylate chromatin protein hmgb1 to redirect it towards secretion. EMBO J. (2003) 22:5551–60.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

37. Garcia de Durango CR, Monteiro MN, Bijnsdorp IV, Pham TV, De WM, Piersma SR, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-regulated secretion of soluble and vesicle-based proteins from a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines. Proteomics Clin Appl. (2021) 15:e1900119.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

38. Volchuk A, Ye A, Chi L, Steinberg BE, Goldenberg NM. Indirect regulation of hmgb1 release by gasdermin D. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:4561–18443.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

39. de GA, Martinon F. Pyroptosis: caspase-11 unlocks the gates of death. Immunity. (2015) 43:835–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Hagar JA, Powell DA, Aachoui Y, Ernst RK, Miao EA. Cytoplasmic lps activates caspase-11: implications in tlr4-independent endotoxic shock. Science. (2013) 341:1250–3.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

41. Lamkanfi M, Sarkar A, Vande WL, Vitari AC, Amer AO, Wewers MD, et al. Inflammasome-dependent release of the alarmin hmgb1 in endotoxemia. J Immunol. (2010) 185:4385–92.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

42. Lu B, Nakamura T, Inouye K, Li J, Tang Y, Lundback P, et al. Novel role of pkr in inflammasome activation and hmgb1 release. Nature. (2012) 488:670–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

43. Hett EC, Slater LH, Mark KG, Kawate T, Monks BG, Stutz A, et al. Chemical genetics reveals a kinase-independent role for protein kinase R in pyroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. (2013) 9:398–405.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

44. Ali SR, Timmer AM, Bilgrami S, Park EJ, Eckmann L, Nizet V, et al. Anthrax toxin induces macrophage death by P38 mapk inhibition but leads to inflammasome activation via atp leakage. Immunity. (2011) 35:34–44.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

45. Cauwels A, Bultinck J, De ZR, Vandendriessche B, Magez S, Brouckaert P. Nitric oxide production by endotoxin preparations in tlr4-deficient mice. Nitric Oxide. (2014) 36:36–43.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

46. Tonetti M, Sturla L, Giovine M, Benatti U, De FA. Extracellular atp enhances mrna levels of nitric oxide synthase and tnf-alpha in lipopolysaccharide-treated raw 264.7 murine macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1995) 214:125–30.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

47. Mehta VB, Hart J, Wewers MD. Atp-stimulated release of interleukin (Il)-1beta and il-18 requires priming by lipopolysaccharide and is independent of caspase-1 cleavage. J Biol Chem. (2001) 276:3820–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

48. Griffiths RJ, Stam EJ, Downs JT, Otterness IG. Atp induces the release of il-1 from lps-primed cells in vivo. J Immunol. (1995) 154:2821–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

49. Perregaux DG, McNiff P, Laliberte R, Conklyn M, Gabel CA. Atp acts as an agonist to promote stimulus-induced secretion of il-1 beta and il-18 in human blood. J Immunol. (2000) 165:4615–23.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

50. Surprenant A, Rassendren F, Kawashima E, North RA, Buell G. The cytolytic P2z receptor for extracellular atp identified as a P2x receptor (P2x7). Science. (1996) 272:735–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

51. Pelegrin P, Surprenant A. Pannexin-1 mediates large pore formation and interleukin-1beta release by the atp-gated P2x7 receptor. EMBO J. (2006) 25:5071–82. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Locovei S, Scemes E, Qiu F, Spray DC, Dahl G. Pannexin1 is part of the pore forming unit of the P2x(7) receptor death complex. FEBS Lett. (2007) 581:483–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

53. Baroja-Mazo A, Barbera-Cremades M, Pelegrin P. The participation of plasma membrane hemichannels to purinergic signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2013) 1828:79–93.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

54. Di Virgilio F. Liaisons dangereuses: P2x(7) and the inflammasome. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2007) 28:465–72.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

55. Ferrari D, Chiozzi P, Falzoni S, Hanau S, Di Virgilio F. Purinergic modulation of interleukin-1 beta release from microglial cells stimulated with bacterial endotoxin. J Exp Med. (1997) 185:579–82.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

56. Li W, Bao G, Chen W, Qiang X, Zhu S, Wang S, et al. Connexin 43 hemichannel as a novel mediator of sterile and infectious inflammatory diseases. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:166–18452.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

57. Chen W, Zhu S, Wang Y, Li J, Qiang X, Zhao X, et al. Enhanced macrophage pannexin 1 expression and hemichannel activation exacerbates lethal experimental sepsis. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:160–37232.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

58. Li W, Li J, Sama AE, Wang H. Carbenoxolone blocks endotoxin-induced protein kinase R (Pkr) activation and high mobility group box 1 (Hmgb1) release. Mol Med. (2013) 19:203–11.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

59. Li W, Zhu S, Li J, D’Amore J, D’Angelo J, Yang H, et al. Serum amyloid a stimulates pkr expression and hmgb1 release possibly through tlr4/rage receptors. Mol Med. (2015) 21:515–25.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

60. Eugenin EA, Branes MC, Berman JW, Saez JC. Tnf-alpha plus ifn-gamma induce connexin43 expression and formation of gap junctions between human monocytes/macrophages that enhance physiological responses. J Immunol. (2003) 170:1320–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

61. Bhattacharyya A, Torre P, Yadav P, Boostanpour K, Chen TY, Tsukui T, et al. Macrophage cx43 is necessary for fibroblast cytosolic calcium and lung fibrosis after injury. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:880887. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.880887

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Jara PI, Boric MP, Sáez JC. Leukocytes Express Connexin 43 after Activation with Lipopolysaccharide and Appear to Form Gap Junctions with Endothelial Cells after Ischemia-Reperfusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (1995) 92:7011–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.7011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Eugenín EA, González HE, Sánchez HA, Brañes MC, Sáez JC. Inflammatory conditions induce gap junctional communication between rat kupffer cells both in vivo and in vitro. Cell Immunol. (2007) 247:103–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.08.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Yu X, Lan P, Hou X, Han Q, Lu N, Li T, et al. Hbv inhibits lps-induced nlrp3 inflammasome activation and il-1β Production via suppressing the nf-Kb pathway and ros production. J Hepatol. (2017) 66:693–702. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.12.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Imamura M, Tsutsui H, Yasuda K, Uchiyama R, Yumikura-Futatsugi S, Mitani K, et al. Contribution of tir domain-containing adapter inducing ifn-beta-mediated il-18 release to lps-induced liver injury in mice. J Hepatol. (2009) 51:333–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.03.027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Fan G, Li Y, Chen J, Zong Y, Yang X. Dha/aa alleviates lps-induced kupffer cells pyroptosis via gpr120 interaction with nlrp3 to inhibit inflammasome complexes assembly. Cell Death Dis. (2021) 12:73. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03347-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Li R, Wei R, Liu C, Zhang K, He S, Liu Z, et al. Heme oxygenase 1-mediated ferroptosis in kupffer cells initiates liver injury during heat stroke. Acta Pharm Sin B. (2024) 14:3983–4000. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.05.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Dosch M, Zindel J, Jebbawi F, Melin N, Sanchez-Taltavull D, Stroka D, et al. Connexin-43-dependent atp release mediates macrophage activation during sepsis. Elife. (2019) 8:e42670. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42670

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. He P, Dai M, Li Z, Wang X, Liu H, He Y, et al. Effect of connexin 43 in lps/il-4-induced macrophage M1/M2 polarization: an observational study. Med (Baltimore). (2024) 103:e37811. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000037811

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Huang Y, Mao Z, Zhang Z, Obata F, Yang X, Zhang X, et al. Connexin43 contributes to inflammasome activation and lipopolysaccharide-initiated acute renal injury via modulation of intracellular oxidative status. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2019) 31:1194–212. doi: 10.1089/ars.2018.7636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Hagiwara S, Iwasaka H, Hasegawa A, Koga H, Noguchi T. Effects of hyperglycemia and insulin therapy on hmgb1 in endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in a rat model. Crit Care Med. (2008) 36:2407–13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180b3ba

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Wang H, Zhu S, Ward MF, Gong J, Sama AE. Hyperglycemia aggravates endotoxin-induced high mobility group box 1 protein release: yet another reason not to be too sweet. Crit Care Med. (2008) 36:2475–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

73. van den BG, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. (2001) 345:1359–67.

Google Scholar

74. Hamaway S, Nwokoma U, Goldberg M, Salifu MO, Saha S, Boursiquot R. Impact of diabetes on covid-19 patient health outcomes in a vulnerable racial minority community. PloS One. (2023) 18:e0286252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286252

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Jiang L, Cheng M. Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of patients with sepsis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. (2022) 14:39. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00803-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Cliff CL, Squires PE, Hills CE. Tonabersat suppresses priming/activation of the nod-like receptor protein-3 (Nlrp3) inflammasome and decreases renal tubular epithelial-to-macrophage crosstalk in a model of diabetic kidney disease. Cell Commun Signal. (2024) 22:351. doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01728-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Fernandez-Cobo M, Gingalewski C, De Maio A. Expression of the connexin 43 gene is increased in the kidneys and the lungs of rats injected with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Shock. (1998) 10:97–102.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

78. Fernandez-Cobo M, Gingalewski C, Drujan D, De Maio A. Downregulation of connexin 43 gene expression in rat heart during inflammation. Role Tumour Necrosis Factor Cytokine. (1999) 11:216–24. doi: 10.1006/cyto.1998.0422

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Zou Z, Liu B, Zeng L, Yang X, Huang R, Wu C, et al. Cx43 inhibition attenuates sepsis-induced intestinal injury via downregulating ros transfer and the activation of the jnk1/sirt1/foxo3a signaling pathway. Mediators Inflammation. (2019) 2019:7854389. doi: 10.1155/2019/7854389

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Zhang J, Yang GM, Zhu Y, Peng XY, Li T, Liu LM. Role of connexin 43 in vascular hyperpermeability and relationship to rock1-mlc20 pathway in septic rats. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2015) 309:L1323–32. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00016.2015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Choi C, Saha A, An S, Cho YK, Kim H, Noh M, et al. Macrophage-specific connexin 43 knockout protects mice from obesity-induced inflammation and metabolic dysfunction. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2022) 10:925971. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.925971

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Grubišić V, McClain JL, Fried DE, Grants I, Rajasekhar P, Csizmadia E, et al. Enteric glia modulate macrophage phenotype and visceral sensitivity following inflammation. Cell Rep. (2020) 32:108100. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Roger E, Chadjichristos CE, Kavvadas P, Price GW, Cliff CL, Hadjadj S, et al. Connexin-43 hemichannels orchestrate nod-like receptor protein-3 (Nlrp3) inflammasome activation and sterile inflammation in tubular injury. Cell Commun Signal. (2023) 21:263. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01245-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Beyer EC, Steinberg TH. Evidence that the gap junction protein connexin-43 is the atp-induced pore of mouse macrophages. J Biol Chem. (1991) 266:7971–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

85. Dbouk HA, Mroue RM, El-Sabban ME, Talhouk RS. Connexins: A myriad of functions extending beyond assembly of gap junction channels. Cell Commun Signal. (2009) 7:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-7-4.:4-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Alves LA, Coutinho-Silva R, Persechini PM, Spray DC, Savino W, Campos de Carvalho AC. Are there functional gap junctions or junctional hemichannels in macrophages? Blood. (1996) 88:328–34.

Google Scholar

87. Schulz R, Gorge PM, Gorbe A, Ferdinandy P, Lampe PD, Leybaert L. Connexin 43 is an emerging therapeutic target in ischemia/reperfusion injury, cardioprotection and neuroprotection. Pharmacol Ther. (2015) 153:90–106.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

88. Contreras JE, Saez JC, Bukauskas FF, Bennett MV. Gating and regulation of connexin 43 (Cx43) hemichannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2003) 100:11388–93.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

89. Unger VM, Kumar NM, Gilula NB, Yeager M. Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant gap junction membrane channel. Science. (1999) 283:1176–80.

Google Scholar

90. Rouach N, Koulakoff A, Abudara V, Willecke K, Giaume C. Astroglial metabolic networks sustain hippocampal synaptic transmission. Science. (2008) 322:1551–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

91. Desplantez T, Verma V, Leybaert L, Evans WH, Weingart R. Gap26, a connexin mimetic peptide, inhibits currents carried by connexin43 hemichannels and gap junction channels. Pharmacol Res. (2012) 65:546–52.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

92. Abudara V, Bechberger J, Freitas-Andrade M, De BM, Wang N, Bultynck G, et al. The connexin43 mimetic peptide gap19 inhibits hemichannels without altering gap junctional communication in astrocytes. Front Cell Neurosci. (2014) 8:306. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00306

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Hulsmans M, Clauss S, Xiao L, Aguirre AD, King KR, Hanley A, et al. Macrophages facilitate electrical conduction in the heart. Cell. (2017) 169:510–22.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

94. Westphalen K, Gusarova GA, Islam MN, Subramanian M, Cohen TS, Prince AS, et al. Sessile alveolar macrophages communicate with alveolar epithelium to modulate immunity. Nature. (2014) 506:503–6. doi: 10.1038/nature12902

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Bermudez-Fajardo A, Ylihärsilä M, Evans WH, Newby AC, Oviedo-Orta E. Cd4+ T lymphocyte subsets express connexin 43 and establish gap junction channel communication with macrophages in vitro. J Leukoc Biol. (2007) 82:608–12. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0307134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Tishchenko A, Azorín DD, Vidal-Brime L, Muñoz MJ, Arenas PJ, Pearce C, et al. Cx43 and associated cell signaling pathways regulate tunneling nanotubes in breast cancer cells. Cancers (Basel). (2020) 12(10):2798. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102798

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Wang X, Veruki ML, Bukoreshtliev NV, Hartveit E, Gerdes HH. Animal cells connected by nanotubes can be electrically coupled through interposed gap-junction channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2010) 107:17194–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006785107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Panchin Y, Kelmanson I, Matz M, Lukyanov K, Usman N, Lukyanov S. A ubiquitous family of putative gap junction molecules. Curr Biol. (2000) 10:R473–R4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

99. Chiu YH, Schappe MS, Desai BN, Bayliss DA. Revisiting multimodal activation and channel properties of pannexin 1. J Gen Physiol. (2018) 150:19–39.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

100. Valdebenito S, Barreto A, Eugenin EA. The role of connexin and pannexin containing channels in the innate and acquired immune response. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2018) 1860:154–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

101. Boyce AKJ, Epp AL, Nagarajan A, Swayne LA. Transcriptional and post-translational regulation of pannexins. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2018) 1860:72–82.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

102. Sandilos JK, Chiu YH, Chekeni FB, Armstrong AJ, Walk SF, Ravichandran KS, et al. Pannexin 1, an atp release channel, is activated by caspase cleavage of its pore-associated C-terminal autoinhibitory region. J Biol Chem. (2012) 287:11303–11. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.323378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Yang D, He Y, Muñoz-Planillo R, Liu Q, Núñez G. Caspase-11 requires the pannexin-1 channel and the purinergic P2x7 pore to mediate pyroptosis and endotoxic shock. Immunity. (2015) 43:923–32. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Chekeni FB, Elliott MR, Sandilos JK, Walk SF, Kinchen JM, Lazarowski ER, et al. Pannexin 1 channels mediate ‘Find-me’ Signal release and membrane permeability during apoptosis. Nature. (2010) 467:863–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

105. Martins I, Wang Y, Michaud M, Ma Y, Sukkurwala AQ, Shen S, et al. Molecular mechanisms of atp secretion during immunogenic cell death. Cell Death Differ. (2014) 21:79–91.

Google Scholar

106. Gulbransen BD, Bashashati M, Hirota SA, Gui X, Roberts JA, MacDonald JA, et al. Activation of neuronal P2x7 receptor-pannexin-1 mediates death of enteric neurons during colitis. Nat Med. (2012) 18:600–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

107. Filiberto AC, Spinosa MD, Elder CT, Su G, Leroy V, Ladd Z, et al. Endothelial pannexin-1 channels modulate macrophage and smooth muscle cell activation in abdominal aortic aneurysm formation. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:1521. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29233-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Parzych K, Zetterqvist AV, Wright WR, Kirkby NS, Mitchell JA, Paul-Clark MJ. Differential role of pannexin-1/atp/P2x7 axis in il-1beta release by human monocytes. FASEB J. (2017) 31:2439–45.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

109. Lee AH, Ledderose C, Li X, Slubowski CJ, Sueyoshi K, Staudenmaier L, et al. Adenosine triphosphate release is required for toll-like receptor-induced monocyte/macrophage activation, inflammasome signaling, interleukin-1β Production, and the host immune response to infection. Crit Care Med. (2018) 46:e1183–e9. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003446

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Chen KW, Demarco B, Broz P. Pannexin-1 promotes nlrp3 activation during apoptosis but is dispensable for canonical or noncanonical inflammasome activation. Eur J Immunol. (2020) 50:170–7. doi: 10.1002/eji.201948254

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Lohman AW, Leskov IL, Butcher JT, Johnstone SR, Stokes TA, Begandt D, et al. Pannexin 1 channels regulate leukocyte emigration through the venous endothelium during acute inflammation. Nat Commun. (2015) 6:7965. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8965.:7965

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Silverman WR, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Locovei S, Qiu F, Carlsson SK, Scemes E, et al. The pannexin 1 channel activates the inflammasome in neurons and astrocytes. J Biol Chem. (2009) 284:18143–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.004804

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Lei Y, Zhou R, Sun X, Tang F, Gao H, Chen L, et al. The pannexin-1 channel regulates pyroptosis through autophagy in a mouse model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Ann Transl Med. (2021) 9:1802. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6579

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Eugenin EA. Role of connexin/pannexin containing channels in infectious diseases. FEBS Lett. (2014) 588:1389–95.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

115. Makarenkova HP, Shestopalov VI. The role of pannexin hemichannels in inflammation and regeneration. Front Physiol. (2014) 5:63. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Chen X, Yuan S, Mi L, Long Y, He H. Pannexin1: insight into inflammatory conditions and its potential involvement in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1217366. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1217366

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Kanneganti TD, Lamkanfi M, Kim YG, Chen G, Park JH, Franchi L, et al. Pannexin-1-mediated recognition of bacterial molecules activates the cryopyrin inflammasome independent of toll-like receptor signaling. Immunity. (2007) 26:433–43.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

118. Xiao F, Waldrop SL, Khimji AK, Kilic G. Pannexin1 contributes to pathophysiological atp release in lipoapoptosis induced by saturated free fatty acids in liver cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2012) 303:C1034–C44.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

119. Marina-García N, Franchi L, Kim YG, Miller D, McDonald C, Boons GJ, et al. Pannexin-1-mediated intracellular delivery of muramyl dipeptide induces caspase-1 activation via cryopyrin/nlrp3 independently of nod2. J Immunol. (2008) 180:4050–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.4050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Medina CB, Mehrotra P, Arandjelovic S, Perry JSA, Guo Y, Morioka S, et al. Metabolites released from apoptotic cells act as tissue messengers. Nature. (2020) 580:130–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2121-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Sáez PJ, Vargas P, Shoji KF, Harcha PA, Lennon-Duménil AM, Sáez JC. Atp promotes the fast migration of dendritic cells through the activity of pannexin 1 channels and P2x(7) receptors. Sci Signal. (2017) 10(506):eaah7107. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aah7107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Ransford GA, Fregien N, Qiu F, Dahl G, Conner GE, Salathe M. Pannexin 1 contributes to atp release in airway epithelia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2009) 41:525–34. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0367OC

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Lucas CD, Medina CB, Bruton FA, Dorward DA, Raymond MH, Tufan T, et al. Pannexin 1 drives efficient epithelial repair after tissue injury. Sci Immunol. (2022) 7:eabm4032. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abm4032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Maier-Begandt D, Comstra HS, Molina SA, Krüger N, Ruddiman CA, Chen YL, et al. A venous-specific purinergic signaling cascade initiated by pannexin 1 regulates tnfα-induced increases in endothelial permeability. Sci Signal. (2021) 14(672):eaba2940. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aba2940

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Li X, Kondo Y, Bao Y, Staudenmaier L, Lee A, Zhang J, et al. Systemic adenosine triphosphate impairs neutrophil chemotaxis and host defense in sepsis. Crit Care Med. (2017) 45:e97–e104. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Wang P, Shi B, Wang C, Wang Y, Que W, Jiang Z, et al. Hepatic pannexin-1 mediates st2(+) regulatory T cells promoting resolution of inflammation in lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxemia. Clin Transl Med. (2022) 12:e849. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.849

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Burma NE, Bonin RP, Leduc-Pessah H, Baimel C, Cairncross ZF, Mousseau M, et al. Blocking microglial pannexin-1 channels alleviates morphine withdrawal in rodents. Nat Med. (2017) 23:355–60.

Google Scholar

128. Thompson RJ, Jackson MF, Olah ME, Rungta RL, Hines DJ, Beazely MA, et al. Activation of pannexin-1 hemichannels augments aberrant bursting in the hippocampus. Science. (2008) 322:1555–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

129. Cisneros-Mejorado A, Gottlieb M, Cavaliere F, Magnus T, Koch-Nolte F, Scemes E, et al. Blockade of P2x7 receptors or pannexin-1 channels similarly attenuates postischemic damage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2015) 35:843–50.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

130. Maes M, Crespo YS, Willebrords J, Weemhoff JL, da Silva TC, Decrock E, et al. Connexin hemichannel inhibition reduces acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice. Toxicol Lett. (2017) 278:30–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

131. Maes M, McGill MR, da Silva TC, Abels C, Lebofsky M, Weemhoff JL, et al. Inhibition of pannexin1 channels alleviates acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Arch Toxicol. (2017) 91:2245–61.

Google Scholar

132. Bravo D, Ibarra P, Retamal J, Pelissier T, Laurido C, Hernandez A, et al. Pannexin 1: A novel participant in neuropathic pain signaling in the rat spinal cord. Pain. (2014) 155:2108–15.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

133. Dossi E, Blauwblomme T, Moulard J, Chever O, Vasile F, Guinard E, et al. Pannexin-1 channels contribute to seizure generation in human epileptic brain tissue and in a mouse model of epilepsy. Sci Transl Med. (2018) 10:10/443.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

134. Eun SY, Seo J, Park SW, Lee JH, Chang KC, Kim HJ. Lps potentiates nucleotide-induced inflammatory gene expression in macrophages via the upregulation of P2y2 receptor. Int Immunopharmacol. (2014) 18:270–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

135. Sperlagh B, Hasko G, Nemeth Z, Vizi ES. Atp released by lps increases nitric oxide production in raw 264.7 macrophage cell line via P2z/P2x7 receptors. Neurochem Int. (1998) 33:209–15.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

136. He Y, Franchi L, Nunez G. The protein kinase pkr is critical for lps-induced inos production but dispensable for inflammasome activation in macrophages. Eur J Immunol. (2013) 43:1147–52.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

137. Wang X, Qin W, Xu X, Xiong Y, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al. Endotoxin-induced autocrine atp signaling inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis through enhancing myosin light chain phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2017) 114:4483–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: Connexin 43, Pannexin 1, hemichannel, ATP, HMGB1, inflammasome, mimetic peptide, innate immune cells

Citation: Li J, Lou L, Chen W, Qiang X, Zhu C and Wang H (2024) Connexin 43 and Pannexin 1 hemichannels as endogenous regulators of innate immunity in sepsis. Front. Immunol. 15:1523306. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1523306

Received: 05 November 2024; Accepted: 05 December 2024;
Published: 23 December 2024.

Edited by:

Junji Xing, Houston Methodist Research Institute, United States

Reviewed by:

Ma Qiang, Southern Medical University, China
Xianzhong Meng, University of Colorado Denver, United States

Copyright © 2024 Li, Lou, Chen, Qiang, Zhu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Haichao Wang, aHdhbmdAbm9ydGh3ZWxsLmVkdQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.