Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Inflammation
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1501125
This article is part of the Research Topic Community Series in C-Reactive Protein in Age-Related Disorders - Volume III View all 6 articles

Higher monomeric C-reactive protein levels are associated with premature coronary artery disease

Provisionally accepted
Ivan Melnikov Ivan Melnikov 1,2*Sergey Kozlov Sergey Kozlov 1Sergey Okhota Sergey Okhota 1Olga Saburova Olga Saburova 1Yuliya Avtaeva Yuliya Avtaeva 1Tatiana Kuznetsova Tatiana Kuznetsova 1Konstantin Guria Konstantin Guria 1Lyudmila Prokofieva Lyudmila Prokofieva 1Tatiana Riazantseva Tatiana Riazantseva 1Shang-Rong Ji Shang-Rong Ji 3Yi Wu Yi Wu 4Zufar Gabbasov Zufar Gabbasov 5
  • 1 National Medical Research Centre of Cardiology named after academician E.I. Chazov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
  • 2 Institute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
  • 3 Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
  • 4 Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
  • 5 National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Chronic inflammation is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Currently, the inflammatory cardiovascular risk is assessed via C-reactive protein (CRP) levels measured using a high-sensitivity assay (hsCRP). Monomeric CRP (mCRP) is a locally produced form of CRP that has emerged as a potential biomarker of inflammation. Aim: This study investigated whether mCRP levels are associated with premature CAD. Materials and methods: This study comprised 103 participants of both sexes, including 50 patients 56±7 years old with premature CAD and 53 patients 51±10 years old without CAD. CAD was verified using coronary angiography, hsCRP levels were measured using a standard assay, and . mCRP levels were measured using fluorescent cytometric beads conjugated with an anti-mCRP antibody. Results: The levels of hsCRP were 0.99 (0.59; 3.10) mg/L vs. 0.63 (0.35; 1.85) mg/L (p = 0.067), and mCRP 6.84 (4.20; 13.78) µg/L vs. 2.57 (0.32; 5.66) µg/L (p <0.001) in patients with CAD vs. patients without CAD, respectively. There was a weak positive correlation between the mCRP and hsCRP levels (ρ = 0.214; p = 0.030). hsCRP levels were below 2.0 mg/L (i.e., there was no residual inflammatory cardiovascular risk) in 70% of patients with CAD and 79% of patients without CAD (p = 0.365). mCRP levels differed between the groups of patients, with hsCRP levels below 2.0 mg/L: 5.14 (4.07; 10.68) µg/L vs. 2.77 (0.53; 5.00) µg/L in patients with or without CAD, respectively (p <0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that mCRP levels were independently associated with premature CAD. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.18 (95% CI 1.06-1.33, p = 0.004) per each µg/L increase in mCRP levels. Conclusion: Higher mCRP levels were associated with premature CAD, independent of hsCRP levels and traditional risk factors.

    Keywords: C-Reactive Protein, Monomeric C-reactive protein, MCRP, Atherosclerosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Inflammation, residual inflammatory cardiovascular risk

    Received: 24 Sep 2024; Accepted: 16 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Melnikov, Kozlov, Okhota, Saburova, Avtaeva, Kuznetsova, Guria, Prokofieva, Riazantseva, Ji, Wu and Gabbasov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ivan Melnikov, National Medical Research Centre of Cardiology named after academician E.I. Chazov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.