Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 06 November 2024
Sec. Inflammation
This article is part of the Research Topic Exploring Immune Cell Roles in Cardiac Repair and Remodeling View all 12 articles

Mechanisms and treatment of atherosclerosis: focus on macrophages

LingNa ZhangLingNa Zhang1JiaWei LiJiaWei Li1YuShun KouYuShun Kou1LuFan ShenLuFan Shen1Hong WangHong Wang1YiYuan WangYiYuan Wang1Ruiling MaRuiling Ma1Tao Wu,Tao Wu1,2Xin YangXin Yang3YuanHui Gu*YuanHui Gu2*Lin Yi,*Lin Yi1,4*
  • 1School of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
  • 2Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
  • 3First School of Clinical Medical, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
  • 4Chronic Disease Laboratory, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

Macrophages are the basic mediators and coordinators of various types of chronic inflammation and play a crucial role in the formation and development of atherosclerosis (AS). In the complex microenvironment of atherosclerotic plaques, macrophages of different sources are exposed to different signal stimuli and thus polarized into various subpopulations. Various types of macrophages with predominantly M1 and M2 phenotypes also play different regulatory roles in the initiation and progression of AS. Lipid-lowering drugs, mainly statins, are widely used in clinical practice, but the adverse reactions are obvious and there is a lack of personalized treatment. Emerging targeted macrophage and Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-related therapies can regulate the cellular microenvironment, inhibit the polarization of M1 macrophages, and promote the activation of M2 macrophages, providing new ideas for the prevention and treatment of AS.

Highlights

● Macrophage phenotypes and their roles are different, and the different phenotypes can be transformed into each other when the cellular microenvironment is changed, affecting the development of AS.

● The main clinical lipid-lowering drugs for AS: Stains have a large impact of adverse effects that should not be ignored; cholesterol uptake inhibitors are poorly effective when used singly; and PCSK9 inhibitors are not easy to use on a large scale because of their high therapeutic costs.

● Therapies targeting macrophages, including TCM, can modulate macrophage polarization thereby improving inflammation, modulating various lipids (including HDL), and ultimately suppressing AS.

1 Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is currently the leading cause of death in China, and the significant increase in the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one of the characteristics of the prevalence and evolution of CVD in Chin (1). ASCVD includes ischemic heart disease (IHD) and ischemic stroke, of which the mortality rate of IHD is higher than that of ischemic stroke and the increase is faster, and the morbidity and mortality rates of IHD and ischemic stroke vary according to age, gender, and region (2, 3). AS usually leads to a variety of serious acute CVDs such as myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and arrhythmias and is the root cause of IHD (4). Therefore, understanding the pathogenesis of AS and improving its therapeutic methods are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of ASCVD.

Macrophages are key effector cells of the immune system, and macrophage polarization refers to the state in which macrophages are activated in a certain time and space. Based on the highly heterogeneous phenotype and function of macrophages, they are generally categorized into M1 and M2 types (5). Macrophages are essential mediators and coordinators of various types of chronic inflammation and are the main participants in a wide range of diseases, such as autoimmune disorders (6), aging (7), cancer (8), and many CVDs (9), and especially play a crucial role in the formation and development of AS (10, 11).

2 Source of macrophages

Based on lineage tracing, flow cytometry, and cell surface expression of CC chemokine receptor 2(CCR2), it has been demonstrated that there are different subpopulations of macrophages in human body containing CCR2 macrophages and CCR2+ macrophages (9), which is presented in Figure 1. CCR2 macrophages, derived from yolk sac (YS) and fetal monocyte progenitor cells, belong to the group of tissue macrophages that are established during the embryonic period and are independent of blood monocytes. After its settlement in the corresponding target organ, it is maintained by localized proliferation and is not dependent on input supplementation from surrounding monocytes. CCR2 macrophages are long-lived, enriched with genes that orchestrate the potential for tissue repair, and involved in many forms of tissue remodeling such as coronary artery development, vasodilatation, and cardiac tissue repair, and they also show potent pro-angiogenic activity (12, 13). CCR2+ macrophages originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells in the periphery, including the bone marrow and spleen, and are maintained under homeostatic and inflammatory conditions by a range of mechanisms, including monocyte recruitment and cell proliferation (14). CCR2+ macrophages are closely associated with inflammation and accumulate in areas of scarred or fibrotic tissue, and rare CCR2+ monocytes in the cardiac region are also found only in the vicinity of blood vessels located in areas of dense fibrosis (12). Cell proliferation serves as an important mechanism for cell maintenance in each macrophage subpopulation, and CCR2+ macrophages show stronger proliferative capacity compared with CCR2 macrophages.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Source of macrophages. CCR2 macrophages originate from the YS and fetal monocyte progenitor cells. Primary erythroid myeloid progenitor cells (EMPs) in the YS product and differentiate into primitive macrophages at embryonic day 9 (E9). Late EMPs migrate to the fetal liver at E9.5, where they develop into fetal liver monocytes, and both of the above cells subsequently migrate into all fetal tissues as both tissue-resident macrophages. CCR2+ macrophages originate from peripheral hematopoietic progenitor cells, such as the bone marrow and spleen. By Figdraw.

At homeostasis, macrophages are maintained primarily by localized proliferation. Before macrophage depletion, embryonic-established tissue macrophages are independent of peripheral monocytes. However, during macrophage depletion or tissue inflammation, they are maintained mainly by monocyte recruitment, and tissue-resident macrophages also expand numerically through proliferation and even become the dominant macrophage population. Notably, CCR2 macrophages do not represent all tissue-resident macrophages, and CCR2+ macrophages did not represent all non-tissue-resident macrophages (15). In addition, it has been shown that the C–C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)–CCR2 axis effectively promotes monocyte mobilization in the bone marrow and that CCL2 mainly acts on “classical” monocytes expressing CCR2 and recruits circulating monocytes to atherosclerotic plaques (16, 17). In addition, there are no studies that clearly show the correlation between tissue-resident macrophages, or the expression of CCR2 on the surface of macrophages and M1- and M2-type macrophages.

3 Polarization of macrophages and AS

AS is a lipid-driven chronic inflammatory disease of the large and medium-sized arterial wall characterized by the formation or even shedding of “plaques” rich in lipids, extracellular matrix, vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and immune cells. Inflammation is one of the important driving factors for the occurrence and development of AS (18) and runs through the whole process of the disease (19). Macrophages are a group of immune cells with high heterogeneity, diversity, and plasticity. In the complex microenvironment of atherosclerotic plaques, macrophages are exposed to different signaling stimuli and thus polarize into different subpopulations with diverse gene and protein expression patterns (20). There are many different macrophage subtypes in atherosclerotic plaques, including M1, M2, and other types of macrophages.

3.1 Mechanisms of AS formation

It is generally accepted that high-risk factors, such as hyperlipidemia, smoking, hypertension, obesity, history of heart disease, and diabetes (21), alter the role of the vascular endothelial cells (ECs) semipermeable barrier and affect its ability to regulate the exchange of fluids, nutrients, and metabolites (22). This results in damage to the vascular endothelium, which in turn advances AS. Among them, the formation of thrombosis is caused by certain inflammation, and it will further promote inflammation (23).

Impaired EC function is activated to allow low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to enter the endangium, where it is modified to oxidized LDL-C (OX-LDL) by free radicals secreted by recruited monocytes. OX-LDL activates the expression of chemokines and adhesion factors (monocyte chemoattractant protein interleukin (MCP)-1, interleukin (IL)-8, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, endothelial cell (E/P) selection) in ECs and recruits circulating monocytes. OX-LDL recruits more immune cells (T cells, B cells, mast cells, and other immune cells) to the lesion, which together promote plaque formation (24, 25). Recruited monocytes in a local microenvironment enriched with growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines subsequently differentiate predominantly into M1 macrophages (26). Macrophages, especially M1 macrophages and SMC-derived macrophages, rapidly recognize and phagocytose OX-LDL via scavenger receptors on their surface, transforming it into foam cells that cause the earliest AS lesions (27, 28). As the disease progresses, accumulation of foam cells, localized necrosis, and fibrous cap formation lead to the formation of stable or unstable plaques. In the late stage of atherosclerosis, plaque instability eventually leads to plaque rupture, hemorrhage, and thrombosis due to hemodynamic changes, stress and inflammatory responses (21).

Atherosclerotic plaques are composed of extracellular lipid particles, foam cells, and debris that accumulate within the intima of the arterial wall to form a lipid or necrotic core. The core is encapsulated by a layer rich in collagen fibers, elastin fibers, SMCs, and extracellular matrix called the fibrous cap (29). The ratio of M1 to M2 varies at different stages and locations of AS. Plaques tend to stabilize when M2 macrophages predominate; plaques stability decrease when M1 macrophages infiltrate. Especially the presence of M1 macrophages in the most unstable plaque shoulder will increase necrotic core formation and plaque fragility. In general, there were far more M1 macrophages than M2 in the core; in the region of the fiber cap, the ratio of the two subtypes was similar (30), which is presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Macrophages during the development of AS. Recruited monocytes (primarily) and tissue-resident macrophages polarize into M1 macrophages (mainly) and M2 macrophages to phagocytose OX-LDL, and SMCs can also differentiate into macrophage-like cells to phagocytose OX-LDL (M2 macrophages are less capable of phagocytosis). When these three types of cells phagocytose an excessive amount of OX-LDL overloaded, they transform into foam cells.

3.2 M1 macrophage and AS

Typically activated macrophages, M1 macrophages, are a phenotype characterized by pro-inflammation (31). M1 macrophages focus on the release of inflammatory mediators, killing and clearance of pathogenic microorganisms, and tumor-killing activity. During AS development, macrophages are stimulated by cholesterol crystals, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), ox-LDL, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands, and the remaining proinflammatory cytokines and are activated to exhibit predominantly pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages (32). Therefore, M1 macrophages secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12, as well as nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (33). Among them, IFN-γ is the main cytokine associated with M1 activation and a major product of T helper (Th)1 cells (34). LPS promotes the expression and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IFN-β, IL-12, TNF, IL-6, and IL-1β), chemokines (e.g., CCL2, CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 10, and CXCL11), and antigen-presenting molecules (e.g., major histocompatibility complex (MHC) members, costimulatory molecules, and antigen-processing peptidases) (35). In addition, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is the newest member of the M1 class of stimulators. GM-CSF is produced by a variety of cells, including macrophages and thin-walled cells, and induces the secretion of the cytokines of IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF, M-CSF, TNF, and IL-1β by monocytes and macrophages, but to a lesser extent than LPS (5).

Functionally, M1 macrophages participate in pathogen clearance and induce tissue damage by activating the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase complex, which generates ROS. Simultaneously, M1 macrophages express chemokine receptor ligands, such as CXCL-9, CXCL-10, and CXCL-5, to promote recruitment of Th1 cells and natural killer cells to generate a sustained inflammatory response that is critical for elimination of cellular pathogens. In the microecological environment of AS, pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages cause persistent inflammation with enhanced phagocytosis and migration, thus sustaining damage to surrounding tissues (33). In addition, enhanced glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) cycle blockade in LPS-stimulated macrophages can both promote a maximal inflammatory response and terminate it later. Compared with glycolysis, IL-4-stimulated macrophages are more dependent on fatty acid oxidation (FAO) (36).

3.3 M2 macrophage and AS

Alternately activated macrophages, M2 macrophages, are a predominantly pro-inflammatory phenotype, reduce plaque size, and enhance plaque stability (30). M2 macrophages focus on suppression of inflammation, removal of cellular debris and apoptotic cells, and promotion of tissue repair and fibrosis, hepatobiliary regeneration, matrix degradation and repair, and tissue reconstruction (33). It can be polarized by a variety of stimulatory factors, including cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13), glucocorticoids, immune complexes (ICs), and LPS (37).

Functionally, activated M2 macrophages produce anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-10, IL-4, TNF-β) and chemokines (e.g., CCL17, CCL22, and CCL24), thereby initiating functional anti-inflammatory regulatory mechanisms, which play an important role in suppressing inflammation and repairing damaged tissues. Among them, IL-4 type I and type II receptors activate signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 6, which in turn activates the transcription of genes typical of M2 macrophage polarization (34). M2 macrophages exhibit weak capacity of lipid accumulation due to low expression of liver X receptor α (LXRα), ATP-binding cassette transporter protein 1 (ABCA1), and apolipoprotein E (ApoE). Enhanced cytokinesis in AS lesions induced by increased M2 macrophage polarization shows another role for M2, so that more M2 macrophages are required for plaque regression. M2 macrophages are classified into four subtypes, M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d, which have different effects on AS (26).

M2a macrophage, induced by IL-4 and IL-13, has potent anti-inflammatory properties, is characterized by poor phagocytosis and inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine release, but is insensitive to inflammatory stimuli and is mainly involved in wound healing, tissue remodeling, and angiogenesis. Thus, M2a is less efficient than M1 in inducing antigen presentation, generating toxic oxygen and nitrogen radicals, and killing intracellular pathogens. M2a cells express high levels of mannose receptor (MR), glucocorticoid receptor (SR), and IL-10 receptor (IL-10R). Polarization of M2a results in the release of pro-fibrotic factors such as TGF-β, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), fibronectin, and inflammatory chemokines such as CCL17, CCL18, CCL22, and CCL24, which contribute to extracellular matrix deposition and contribute to tissue repair and thus have been described as “tissue repair” macrophages (38). In addition, IL-6 expression induces M2a macrophage polarization toward M1/M2b; if IL-6 is inhibited, M1/M2b macrophages are induced to polarize toward M2a, thereby controlling atherosclerotic intimal hyperplasia (39).

M2b macrophages, induced by IC, TLR agonists, and IL-1R ligands, are polarized to release high levels of CCL1, IL-6, IL-1β, TNFα, and TNF superfamily member 14 (TNFSF14). In addition, M2b macrophages express and secrete large amounts of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and low levels of the pro-inflammatory factor IL-12, with both inhibitory and promotional effects, termed regulatory macrophages (37). M2b macrophages may inhibit AS by suppressing leukocyte infiltration, and transplanted M2b macrophages may also protect the heart from damage associated with ischemia–reperfusion (40).

M2c macrophage, in a microenvironment enriched with glucocorticoids, IL-10, TGFβ, and prostaglandins E2, are induced to polarize to become M2c macrophage by IL-10R and transcription activator 3 (TAT3) (37), which then secrete high levels of IL-10, TGF-β, and PTX3 proteins to achieve the associated inflammatory regression and tissue repair (38). Both M2b and M2c macrophages have regulatory functions in addition to being antigen-presenting cells, which are characterized by the release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. However, both M2b and M2c macrophages have the ability to produce large quantities of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and both exhibit high expression of Mer receptor tyrosine kinase and are efficiently phagocytized, so they are also known as regulatory macrophages.

M2d macrophages represent a new subpopulation of M2 macrophage, also known as tumor-associated macrophage, induced by TLR ligands, A2 adenosine receptor agonists, and IL-6 (37). Moreover, M2d macrophages have been shown to participate in angiogenesis through the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and IL-10, as well as secrete a certain amount of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), resulting in a pro-inflammatory effect (38). However, unlike the typical M2 macrophage, M2d macrophages do not express Ym1, Fizz1, or cluster of differentiation (CD) 206. Likewise, IL-10 contributes to M2d polarization and VEGF production.

3.4 Other types of macrophages and AS

In addition to macrophages of the M1 and M2 phenotypes, other polarized macrophages were observed in the plaques such as M(Hb), Mhem, Mox, and M4 (32). Comparative characteristics of macrophage subtypes are shown in Figure 3. Mox macrophages are induced by oxidized phospholipids and ox-LDL and are characterized by reduced phagocytic activity and chemotaxis, which account for approximately 30% of the total macrophage content of atherosclerotic plaques. In addition, the expression of antioxidant enzymes in Mox macrophages was significantly upregulated by nuclear factor red lineage 2 (NRF 2)-related genes but retained the ability to release the pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10, IL-1β, and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, thereby exerting an antioxidant effect (30). This suggests that Mox macrophage may also have anti-atherosclerotic and anti-oxidative stress capabilities (41). M4 macrophages are induced to polarization by CXCL4 and express pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α. However, M4 macrophages express both pro-AS and anti-AS genes and lack the associated expression of CD163, thus having a dual role in AS (30, 32). The phagocytosis of M4 macrophages is inhibited, with a lower expression of scavenger receptors and a higher expression of cholesterol efflux transporter proteins, suggesting a lesser ability to form foam cells (42).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Comparative characteristics of macrophage subtypes. (By Figdraw.).

M (Hb) and Mhem macrophages differ from other macrophages in that they coexist at newly formed vessels and the site of hemorrhage in unstable plaques. Intraplaque hemorrhage promotes AS by providing cholesterol-rich erythrocyte membranes and a dual stimulus of oxidized heme and iron. M(Hb) macrophages polarized by hemoglobin (Hb) stimulation typically express high levels of MR and CD163 and are involved in the clearance of the hemoglobin/hemopexin (Hb/Hp) complex after plaque hemorrhage. Following endocytosis of the Hb/Hp complex and erythrocytes, released hemoglobin polarizes macrophages to the Mhem phenotype (42). In intraplaque hemorrhage, M(Hb) and Mhem macrophages recycle erythrocyte remnants and Hb, possibly induced by Hb, albumin, and CD163. M(Hb) macrophages release LXRα, LXRβ, and ABC transporter proteins (ABCA1 and ABCG1) responsible for cholesterol efflux. Mhem macrophages release heme oxygenase-1, which prevents foam cell formation and shows anti-atherosclerotic effects by reducing oxidative damage in plaques. In addition, M(Hb) and Mhem are equally anti-inflammatory, producing anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, thereby preventing the progression of plaque formation (32).

4 Present therapy status of AS

4.1 Conventional medical treatment of AS

ASCVD is directly associated with elevated levels of LDL-C and ApoB 100, and LDL-C-containing infiltration and retention in the arterial wall are a key initiating event in AS, which triggers an inflammatory response and promotes AS (43). Since cholesterol metabolism is crucial in the pathogenesis of AS, lipid-lowering drugs have long been used as the mainstay of clinical treatment for AS, so this article is only relevant to lipid-lowering drugs. Global clinical guidelines recommend LDL-C as the primary target for lipid control, and statins are recommended as the first-line therapeutic agent for lowering LDL-C levels, in conjunction with cholesterol absorption inhibitor and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin/type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, if necessary (44, 45). The mechanism of the above three classes of drugs is shown in Figure 4. Notably, the modulatory effect of statins on inflammation (anti-inflammatory/pro-inflammatory) is somewhat controversial, and statins could induce macrophage polarization into M1-type macrophages, M2-type macrophages, or both M1 and M2, which is related to the cellular microenvironment as well as to the variability of statins (46, 47). It has been shown that monocytes and macrophages are differentially regulated by statins, with monocytes showing no change in response to statins, but macrophages differentiated in the presence of statins remain functionally responsive to inflammatory activation, retaining their monocyte function and maintaining an immune/inflammatory response state (48). In addition, PCSK9 induces pro-inflammatory macrophage activation and does not depend on the mechanism of the LDL receptor (LDL-R) (49, 50), from which it can also be inferred that PCSK9 inhibitors have some anti-inflammatory effects.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Therapeutic targets and pathway mechanisms of three common lipid-lowering drugs in AS. The top half Cholesterol uptake inhibitors mainly inhibit Niemann–Pick C1-like (NPC1L) 1, a highly glycosylated 13-pass membrane receptor protein localized to the apical membrane of intestinal epithelial cells of the brush border of the small intestine and the tubular membranes of hepatocytes, which plays an important role in dietary cholesterol uptake and biliary cholesterol reabsorption. ABCG5/ABCG8 at the same location can translocate unesterified cholesterol back to the intestinal lumen or secrete it directly into the bile. Lower left Statins primarily inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-COA) reductase to reduce the generation of endogenous cholesterol, in addition to upregulating LDL-R synthesis and inhibiting the synthesis of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). Lower right Left: LDL-C uptake is driven by endocytosis of LDL-R on the surface of hepatocytes. Right: Circulating PCSK9 is captured and presented to the LDLR, which binds to form the PCSK9-LDL-R complex, and after endocytosis, PCSK9 and LDL-R are degraded and reduced. PCSK9 inhibitors injected subcutaneously block LDL-R degradation by inhibiting PCSK9. By Figdraw.

These drugs are widely used in clinical practice and have proven efficacy; however, their adverse effects should not be ignored. Adverse effects of statins include abnormalities in liver function, such as elevated transaminases and varying degrees of liver damage. Moreover, statins inhibit mitochondrial function, reduce energy production, and alter muscle protein degradation, resulting in muscle-related symptoms such as muscle pain, muscle weakness, and, in rare cases, rhabdomyolysis (51). In addition, statins have an effect on blood glucose, such as elevated blood glucose, and there is an increased risk of new-onset diabetes with long-term, high-dose statin use (52). Other studies suggest that statins may be the cause of coronary artery calcification and can act as mitochondrial toxins to impair muscle function in the heart and blood vessels (53). Cholesterol absorption inhibitors, such as ezetimibe and hybutimibe, can reduce LDL by approximately 15%–20% when used alone. This is because dietary sources of cholesterol account for 30% of the three cholesterol source pathways, have a single mechanism of action, are less effective than statins, and often need to be used in combination with statins (54). PCSK-9 inhibitors as monoclonal antibodies block PCSK-9 and reduce LDL-C, showing anti-atherosclerotic activity. However, the high cost of treatment limits their larger-scale application. Notably guidelines around the world emphasize the long-term, personalized, and preventive nature of AS drug therapy (55). Therefore, the monotypic and uniform nature of AS medication needs to be somewhat reformed.

4.2 Emerging targeted macrophage treatment of AS

4.2.1 Macrophage and inflammatory

As a kind of chronic inflammatory diseases of the arterial wall, the necessity of targeted inflammatory therapy is self-evident, and in recent years, a growing number of studies have shown that AS can be inhibited by modulating M1/M2-type macrophages. One study utilized a mouse model of AS with EC-specific knockout of the transcription factor BACH1 and concluded that deletion of BACH1 attenuates AS by reducing endothelial inflammation (56). Studies have been shown that myeloid-derived CD147 ultimately exacerbates AS by enhancing macrophage infiltration and polarization, leading to enhanced apoptosis and impaired efferocytosis within the plaque, and contributes to plaque instability. It was then concluded that anti-human CD147 antibody prevents AS progression by inhibiting M1-type macrophages polarization, promoting transformation of M2-type macrophages, and thus suppressing inflammation and enhancing efferocytosis (57). It has also been shown that ultraviolet B (UV-B) could inhibit AS by promoting polarization of M2-type macrophages and limiting the inflammatory response in plaques (58).

4.2.2 Macrophage and oxidative stress

Oxidative stress is a type of response in which the degree of oxidation is decompensated after the body is stimulated, leading to excessive accumulation of ROS in the body or in cells. This in turn causes cytotoxicity, which leads to tissue damage, and ROS are also one of the secretions of M1-type macrophages. In AS, increased ROS promote oxidative modification of LDL to OX-LDL, leading to endothelial dysfunction, activation, and promotion of inflammatory factor expression (59). In addition, the large amount of ROS released by damaged endothelial cells can polarize M2-type macrophages to M1-type (60). Studies have shown that L-cystathionine can effectively inhibit oxidative stress in macrophages by suppressing free radical production and enhancing antioxidant capacity to inhibit AS (61). Melatonin can efficiently alleviate PM2.5-induced M1-type macrophage polarization and AS by regulating oxidative stress homeostasis (62).

4.2.3 Macrophage and ferroptosis

Ferroptosis is a kind of cell death induced by lipid peroxidation that occurs in the presence of Fe2+ or ester oxygenase. When the ferromodulin–ferritin axis, a key mechanism responsible for regulating iron homeostasis, is abnormal, it causes iron overload, lipid peroxidation, and inflammatory responses in macrophages, thereby promoting AS (63). It was confirmed that differentially expressed genes for ferroptosis in plaques (ALOX5 and NCF2) may promote AS by mediating macrophage ferroptosis (64). Therefore, inhibition of ferroptosis in macrophages is a potential target for the treatment of AS. For example, both micheliolide (64) and melatonin (65) upregulate GPX4/xCT by activating the NRF2 pathway, thereby inhibiting macrophages ferroptosis and ultimately inhibiting AS.

4.2.4 Macrophage and apoptosis and efferocytosis

Macrophage apoptosis and efferocytosis play key roles in the development of AS. Macrophage apoptosis occurs at all stages of AS, and efferocytosis is the process of phagocytosis and removal of apoptotic cells from the lesion. Effective efferocytosis inhibits the formation of necrotic cores, leading to a decrease in pro-inflammatory factors released by apoptotic cells and an increase in anti-inflammatory mediators secreted by phagocytes. In advanced lesions, the long-term accumulation of apoptotic cellular debris, coupled with impaired macrophage efferocytosis, exacerbates inflammation and leads to the formation of plaque necrotic cores (57). It has been shown that NADPH oxidases (NOX) 2 has a key role in AS a major source of ROS in macrophages. NOX2 inhibitors stabilize rupture-prone plaques by promoting intraplaque macrophage efferocytosis via MerTK, which is an important macrophage receptor that binds to apoptotic cells to promote efferocytosis (66). LXR, a member of the metabotropic nuclear receptor superfamily, is a regulatory center of lipid metabolism and inflammation. Among them, LXRα stabilizes vulnerable plaques and prevents plaque rupture by ameliorating macrophage endoplasmic reticulum stress, attenuating apoptosis, and promoting efferocytosis (67).

4.2.5 Macrophage and autophagy-lysosomal pathway

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation system in which macroautophagy transports cytoplasmic material to lysosomes via double-membrane autophagosomes, and degradation of other forms of autophagy, including chaperone-mediated autophagy and microautophagy, occurs directly on lysosomes (68). The autophagy-lysosomal pathway in macrophages shows an important protective role in the development of AS by promoting lipid solubilization and efflux (69). Reduced ox-LDL or adiponectin allows lysosomal dysfunction, whereas plaque formation leads to autophagy dysfunction, and impaired autophagy-lysosomal pathways lead to cholesterol crystal accumulation and mitochondrial dysfunction, which ultimately promotes inflammasome hyperactivation, M1-like polarization, and apoptosis thereby promoting AS (70). In addition, activation of the mTOR pathway inhibits autophagy and leads to lysosomal dysfunction, and cholesterol transport from lysosomes to the endoplasmic reticulum is also blocked by the activated mTOR pathway. Targeting the autophagy-lysosomal pathway in macrophages and inhibiting the mTOR pathway could increase M2-type polarization, which stabilizes plaques and blocks M1-type polarization (6971). Research has shown that arsenic trioxide promotes ROS induction, leading to nuclear translocation of the transcription factor EB and inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, which ultimately promotes autophagy of macrophages and inhibits early-stage lesions in AS (71). Overexpression of the autophagy-specific regulator autophagy-related (ATG) 14 in macrophages enhances autophagosome-lysosome fusion, promotes lipid degradation to reduce Ox-LDL-induced apoptosis and inflammation, and ultimately alleviates AS (72). Expression of the macrophage-specific autophagy-related gene, the small heat shock protein (HSPB) 8, is associated with macrophage polarization and inflammatory factors in AS, and down-regulation of HSPB8 may be involved in M2-type macrophage polarization in AS, which may indirectly accelerate AS progression (73).

4.2.6 Macrophage and others

SMC plays an important role in AS through phenotypic switching and is a major source of foam cells. In contrast to macrophages, low levels of lysosomal acid lipase in SMC lead to defects in their lysosomal cholesterol processing (74), thereby increasing cholesterol efflux and promoting AS. Thus, SMC can be a new target for the prevention and treatment of AS (75). It has been shown that all-trans retinoic acid may have a positive therapeutic effect on AS by blocking SMC phenotypic transformation and promoting fibrous cap stability (76).

In addition, dyslipidemia is not only an elevation of LDL-C but also an elevation of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRL) and a decrease in high-density lipoproteins (HDL). While LDL-lowering therapies may contribute to the overall decline in LDL and obesity, subsequent insulin resistance and a high-carbohydrate diet lead to an increased prevalence of a number of disorders, such as “metabolic syndrome,” which is characterized in part by elevated TGRL (19). Clinical studies have found that HDL levels are negatively associated with the risk of developing ASCVD (77). HDL is primarily responsible for transporting cholesterol from peripheral tissues, including atherosclerotic plaques, to the liver, where it is excreted as bile acids. Activating transcription factor (ATF) 3 in hepatocytes can ultimately inhibit the development of AS by enhancing HDL uptake, inhibiting intestinal cholesterol and lipid absorption, regulating bile acid metabolism, and promoting reverse cholesterol transport in macrophages (78). It has been shown that modification of HDL by reactive dicarbonyl species significantly impairs the anti-AS function of HDL and that dicarbonyl scavenger enhances HDL function, reduces systemic inflammation, increases plaque stability, and slows the progression of AS (79). Therefore, treatments targeting HDL against AS also have great potential.

Taken together, all of the above relevant targets and mechanisms provide new reference information for targeting macrophages to prevent and treat AS (see Figure 5).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Summary of emerging targeted macrophage treatment of AS (By Figdraw.).

4.3 Macrophages and traditional Chinese medicine treatment in AS

TCM has the advantages of multicomponents and multitargets. In recent years, a number of studies have provided new ideas for the prevention and treatment of AS. In this paper, the mechanism of TCM in treating AS through the target of macrophages was explored in three TCM categories: monomer, extract, and compound. The search tool used was PubMed, and AS, Macrophages & TCM was searched in the title/abstract. The details are shown in Table 1 (herbal monomers/extracts for AS via macrophages) and Table 2 (herbal compounds for AS via macrophages). Moreover, according to the table, the mechanisms and effects of TCM medicines in treating AS were summarized, and the details are shown in Figure 6.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Herbal monomers/extracts for AS via macrophages.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Herbal compounds for AS via macrophages.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Therapeutic targets and pathway mechanisms of partial TCM for AS. Left: TCM acts on macrophage-related targets and pathways. Right: Summary of commonalities related to TCM treatment. By Figdraw.

Notably, TCM can inhibit the polarization of M1 macrophages and promote the activation of M2 macrophages as a means of delaying the development of AS and enhancing plaque stability. For example, in the table, the herbal monomer geniposide induced M2 polarization in plaques via upregulation of CXCL14 (80); the herbal extract Leech Peptide HE-D inhibited macrophage migratory activity and promoted macrophage transformation from M1 to M2 via the NF-κB signaling pathway (81); the herbal compound Jisil Haebaek Gyeji-Tang inhibits polarization of inflammatory M1-type macrophages by inhibiting MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways (82); and Tanyu Tongzhi Formula promoted the activation of M2 macrophages by activating the PPARγ signaling pathway and inhibiting the AKT/ERK signaling pathway (83). Thus, macrophage polarization is closely related to cytokine–cytokine receptors, chemokine-related signaling pathways, and inflammation-related MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways, reflecting the importance of the cellular microenvironment for macrophage polarization and function.

It has been shown that Ganoderma Lucidum Spore Ethanol Extract, via the LXRα-related pathway, can regulate lipid metabolism, in which TG and LDL-C are reduced and HDL-C is elevated, thereby inhibiting foam cell formation and also ruling out the typical adverse effects of statins, such as muscle-related symptoms and liver function abnormalities. Therefore, the targets of TCM are not limited to the reduction of LDL but also target the elevation of HDL, which serves to comprehensively regulate lipids.

5 Conclusion and perspective

With further development of the research, three hypotheses of AS generation have been proposed: Response-to-injury hypothesis, Response-to-retention hypothesis, and Oxidative modification hypothesis. Although the key factors for AS initiation differ among the three hypotheses, all emphasize inflammation (especially macrophages) as a necessary and sufficient condition to demonstrate AS development (25). Macrophages play a central role in the development of AS. As one of the major immune cells in the body, they are actively involved in the physiological and pathological processes of in vivo immunity, regulating local inflammatory responses and promoting plaque formation and thrombosis through antigen presentation, polarization, and phagocytosis. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the functions of different macrophage phenotypes and the mechanisms behind these functions could help to identify the potential role played by macrophages in the pathogenesis of AS.

In addition, many factors have been associated with the occurrence, progression, and outcome of AS, such as metabolic reprogramming, miRNAs, and epigenetic modifications, all of which influence macrophage polarization (30, 57). Transcription factors, epigenetic landscapes, and microRNA networks are regulated through the expression of multiple layers of related genes, resulting in the dynamic regulation of a complex network of genes that control macrophage polarization and all types of macrophages. These factors strongly influence macrophage polarization, as well as macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses. For example, microRNAs are able to modulate the duration and magnitude of the innate immune responses, participating as part of a feedback loop regulatory mechanism that significantly shapes the inflammatory response and modulates sensitivity to endotoxin to prevent hyperinflammation in macrophages (10).

Notably, smart bio-nanoparticles and drug-controlled release strategies have been a hotspot of research in recent years, and nanotechnology has a promising future in the diagnosis and treatment of AS (84). Compared with traditional drugs, functionalized modification of nanoparticle surfaces using targeted ligand molecules enables nanomedicines to precisely target AS vascular ECs, which can effectively reduce off-target effects (85). Macrophages, which are present in a variety of tissues under homeostatic conditions and polarize into different phenotypes in response to key factors in the cellular microenvironment, are excellent tools for manipulating and targeting therapeutic agents. Among other things, emphasis will be placed on manipulating macrophage signaling pathways and other mechanisms of AS (86). However, effective delivery of therapeutic agents to targeted lesions and cells remains a daunting task. More mature nanotechnologies have been developed and focused on the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerosis, such as micro-nanobubbles (MNBs). When microbubbles are introduced into the blood stream, the size of the bubbles remains stable, and the smaller the diameter the better the distribution and penetration efficiency, especially for micro- and nano-bubbles. MNBs become extremely promising therapeutic agents by reaching the target site by aggregation or penetration with sufficiently small size and strong properties (87).

In summary, further studies on the specific mechanisms of macrophage polarization in AS will provide a theoretical basis for the development of new therapeutic strategies targeting macrophage polarization. Modulation of macrophage polarization status and promotion of M2-type macrophage function may help to reduce inflammation and improve plaque stability. Also, monitoring of macrophage polarization may be one of the indicators for assessing disease risk and treatment efficacy.

Author contributions

LNZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JWL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YSK: Writing – review & editing. LFS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YYW: Writing – review & editing. RLM: Writing – review & editing. TW: Writing – review & editing. XY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YHG: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. LY: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 82160842; Traditional Chinese Medicine scientific research Project in Gansu Province in 2023, No. GZKP-2022-40; Open Subjects of Dunhuang Medicine in the Key Laboratory of Translation of the Ministry of Education, No. DHYX23-07; General Program of the Joint Scientific Research Fund, No. 23JRRA1521; Youth Science and Technology Fund Program of Gansu Province, NO. 21JR7RA643; Gansu Provincial People's Hospital youth training project, NO. 20GSSY4-22.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Glossary

AS: Atherosclerosis

TCM: Traditional Chinese medicine

CVD: Cardiovascular disease

ASCVD: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

IHD: Ischemic heart disease

CCR2: CC chemokine receptor 2

CCL2: C–C motif chemokine ligand 2

YS: Yolk sac

EMP: Erythroid myeloid progenitor cell

E9/9.5: Day 9/9.5

SMC: Smooth muscle cell

EC: Endothelial cell

LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

OX-LDL: Oxidize LDL

MCP-1: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1

IL: Interleukin

VCAM-1: Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

E/P Selection: Endothelial cell Selectin

IFN-γ/β: Interferon-γ/β

LPS: Lipopolysaccharide

TLR: Toll-like receptor

TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor-α

NO: Nitric oxide

ROS: Reactive oxygen species

Th1 cell: T helper 1 cell

CXCL: CXC chemokine ligand

MHC: Major histocompatibility complex

G-CSF: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

M-CSF: Macrophage colony-stimulating factor

NADPH: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

TCA: Tricarboxylic acid cycle

FAO: Fatty acid oxidation

IC: Immune complexes

STAT6: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6

LXRα/β: Liver X receptor α/β

ABCA1: ATP-binding cassette transporter protein 1

ApoE/B: Apolipoprotein E/B

MR: Mannose receptor

SR: Glucocorticoid receptor

IL-xR: IL-x receptor

TGF-β: Transforming growth factor-β

IGF: Insulin-like growth factor

TNFSF14: TNF superfamily member 14

TAT3: Transcription activator 3

VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor

iNOS: Inducible nitric oxide synthase

CD206/147: Cluster of differentiation 206/147

NRF2: Nuclear factor red lineage 2

COX-2: Cyclooxygenase-2

Hb: Hemoglobin

Hb/Hp Complex: Hemoglobin/hemopexin complex

ABCG1/5/8: ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters G1/5/8

PCSK9: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin/type 9

LDL-R: Low-density lipoprotein receptor

NPC1L1: Niemann–Pick C1-like 1

HMG-COA: 3-Hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A

VLDL: Very low-density lipoprotein

UVB: Ultraviolet B

NOX2: NADPH oxidases 2

ATG14: Autophagy-related 14

HSPB8: The small heat shock protein B8

ATF3: Activating transcription factor 3

TGRL: Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins

HDL: High-density lipoproteins.

Abbreviations

    References

    1. Qian Y, Tan JB, Wang T, Bressington D, Zhou HJ, Li MY, et al. Quality appraisal and descriptive analysis of clinical practice guidelines for self-managed non-pharmacological interventions of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. J Transl Med. (2024) 22:215. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04959-5

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    2. Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, Yin P, Zhu J, Chen W, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2019) 394:1145–58. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30427-1

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    3. Zhao D, Liu J, Wang M, Zhang X, Zhou M. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: current features and implications. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2019) 16:203–12. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0119-4

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    4. Lutgens E, Osto E, Bochaton-Piallat ML. The European Society of Cardiology working group on atherosclerosis and vascular biology. Eur Heart J. (2024) 45:84–6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad536

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    5. Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. (2014) 6:13. doi: 10.12703/p6-13

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    6. Ma WT, Gao F, Gu K, Chen DK. The role of monocytes and macrophages in autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive review. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1140. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01140

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    7. Duong L, Radley HG, Lee B, Dye DE, Pixley FJ, Grounds MD, et al. Macrophage function in the elderly and impact on injury repair and cancer. Immun Ageing. (2021) 18:4. doi: 10.1186/s12979-021-00215-2

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    8. Li X, Liu R, Su X, Pan Y, Han X, Shao C, et al. Harnessing tumor-associated macrophages as aids for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. (2019) 18:177. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1102-3

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    9. Bajpai G, Schneider C, Wong N, Bredemeyer A, Hulsmans M, Nahrendorf M, et al. The human heart contains distinct macrophage subsets with divergent origins and functions. Nat Med. (2018) 24:1234–45. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0059-x

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    10. Locati M, Curtale G, Mantovani A. Diversity, mechanisms, and significance of macrophage plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol. (2020) 15:123–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012718

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    11. Song L, Zhang J, Ma D, Fan Y, Lai R, Tian W, et al. A bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis of macrophage polarization in atherosclerosis from 2001 to 2021. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:910444. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.910444

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    12. Wong NR, Mohan J, Kopecky BJ, Guo S, Du L, Leid J, et al. Resident cardiac macrophages mediate adaptive myocardial remodeling. Immunity. (2021) 54:2072–2088.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.003

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    13. Jia D, Chen S, Bai P, Luo C, Liu J, Sun A, et al. Cardiac resident macrophage-derived legumain improves cardiac repair by promoting clearance and degradation of apoptotic cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction. Circulation. (2022) 145:1542–56. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.057549

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    14. Bajpai G, Bredemeyer A, Li W, Zaitsev K, Koenig AL, Lokshina I, et al. Tissue resident CCR2- and CCR2+ Cardiac macrophages differentially orchestrate monocyte recruitment and fate specification following myocardial injury. Circ Res. (2019) 124:263–78. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.118.314028

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    15. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Beaudin AE, Sojka DK, Carrero JA, Calderon B, et al. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity. (2014) 40:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.019

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    16. Zhang H, Yang K, Chen F, Liu Q, Ni J, Cao W, et al. Role of the CCL2-CCR2 axis in cardiovascular disease: Pathogenesis and clinical implications. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:975367. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.975367

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    17. Georgakis MK, Bernhagen J, Heitman LH, Weber C, Dichgans M. Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 axis for atheroprotection. Eur Heart J. (2022) 43:1799–808. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac094

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    18. Ketelhuth DFJ, Lutgens E, Bäck M, Binder CJ, Van den Bossche J, Daniel C, et al. Immunometabolism and atherosclerosis: perspectives and clinical significance: a position paper from the Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc Res. (2019) 115:1385–92. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz166

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    19. Libby P. The changing landscape of atherosclerosis. Nature. (2021) 592:524–33. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03392-8

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    20. Makuch M, Stepanechko M, Bzowska M. The dance of macrophage death: the interplay between the inevitable and the microenvironment. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1330461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1330461

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    21. Khatana C, Saini NK, Chakrabarti S, Saini V, Sharma A, Saini RV, et al. Mechanistic insights into the oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced atherosclerosis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2020), 5245308. doi: 10.1155/2020/5245308

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    22. Alexander Y, Osto E, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, Shechter M, Trifunovic D, Duncker DJ, et al. Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: a consensus paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation, and Thrombosis. Cardiovasc Res. (2021) 117:29–42. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa085

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    23. Libby P, Hansson GK. From focal lipid storage to systemic inflammation: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 74:1594–607. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.061

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    24. Nie H, Yan C, Zhou W, Li TS. Analysis of immune and inflammation characteristics of atherosclerosis from different sample sources. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2022>), 5491038. doi: 10.1155/2022/5491038

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    25. Li H, Cao Z, Wang L, Liu C, Lin H, Tang Y, et al. Macrophage subsets and death are responsible for atherosclerotic plaque formation. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:843712. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.843712

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    26. Hou P, Fang J, Liu Z, Shi Y, Agostini M, Bernassola F, et al. Macrophage polarization and metabolism in atherosclerosis. Cell Death Dis. (2023) 14:691. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-06206-z

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    27. Miao G, Zhao X, Chan SL, Zhang L, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Vascular smooth muscle cell c-Fos is critical for foam cell formation and atherosclerosis. Metabolism. (2022) 132:155213. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155213

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    28. Pi S, Mao L, Chen J, Shi H, Liu Y, Guo X, et al. The P2RY12 receptor promotes VSMC-derived foam cell formation by inhibiting autophagy in advanced atherosclerosis. Autophagy. (2021) 17:980–1000. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1741202

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    29. Borén J, Chapman MJ, Krauss RM, Packard CJ, Bentzon JF, Binder CJ, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: pathophysiological, genetic, and therapeutic insights: a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:2313–30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz962

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    30. Yang S, Yuan HQ, Hao YM, Ren Z, Qu SL, Liu LS, et al. Macrophage polarization in atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. (2020) 501:142–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.10.034

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    31. Luo M, Zhao F, Cheng H, Su M, Wang Y. Macrophage polarization: an important role in inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1352946. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1352946

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    32. Eshghjoo S, Kim DM, Jayaraman A, Sun Y, Alaniz RC. Macrophage polarization in atherosclerosis. Genes (Basel). (2022). doi: 10.3390/genes13050756

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    33. Wu J, He S, Song Z, Chen S, Lin X, Sun H, et al. Macrophage polarization states in atherosclerosis. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1185587. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1185587

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    34. Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. (2012) 122:787–95. doi: 10.1172/jci59643

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    35. Hinshaw DC, Hanna A, Lama-Sherpa T, Metge B, Kammerud SC, Benavides GA, et al. Hedgehog signaling regulates metabolism and polarization of mammary tumor-associated macrophages. Cancer Res. (2021) 81:5425–37. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-20-1723

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    36. Tabas I, Bornfeldt KE. Intracellular and intercellular aspects of macrophage immunometabolism in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2020) 126:1209–27. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.119.315939

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    37. Wang LX, Zhang SX, Wu HJ, Rong XL, Guo J. M2b macrophage polarization and its roles in diseases. J Leukoc Biol. (2019) 106:345–58. doi: 10.1002/jlb.3ru1018-378rr

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    38. Ross EA, Devitt A, Johnson JR. Macrophages: the good, the bad, and the gluttony. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:708186. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708186

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    39. Chen J, Wang W, Ni Q, Zhang L, Guo X. Interleukin 6-regulated macrophage polarization controls atherosclerosis-associated vascular intimal hyperplasia. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:952164. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.952164

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    40. Yue Y, Yang X, Feng K, Wang L, Hou J, Mei B, et al. M2b macrophages reduce early reperfusion injury after myocardial ischemia in mice: A predominant role of inhibiting apoptosis via A20. Int J Cardiol. (2017) 245:228–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.085

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    41. Zhai S, Zhang X, Jiang M, Liu Y, Qu G, Cui X, et al. Nanoparticles with intermediate hydrophobicity polarize macrophages to plaque-specific Mox phenotype via Nrf2 and HO-1 activation. J Hazard Mater. (2024) 466:133590. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133590

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    42. Poznyak AV, Nikiforov NG, Starodubova AV, Popkova TV, Orekhov AN. Macrophages and foam cells: brief overview of their role, linkage, and targeting potential in atherosclerosis. Biomedicines. (2021) 9. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091221

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    43. Linton MF, Yancey PG, Davies SS, Jerome WG, Linton EF, Song WL, et al. The role of lipids and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. In: Feingold KR, et al, editors. Endotext. MDText.com, Inc, South Dartmouth (MA (2000).

    Google Scholar

    44. Li JJ, Zhao SP, Zhao D, Lu GP, Peng DQ, Liu J, et al. 2023 Chinese guideline for lipid management. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1190934. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1190934

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    45. Pirillo A, Casula M, Catapano AL. European guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidaemias: New concepts and future challenges. Pharmacol Res. (2023) 196:106936. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106936

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    46. Sadeghi M, Khayati S, Dehnavi S, Almahmeed W, Sukhorukovi VN, Sahebkar A. Regulatory impact of statins on macrophage polarization: mechanistic and therapeutic implications. J Pharm Pharmacol. (2024) 76:763–75. doi: 10.1093/jpp/rgae024

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    47. Tajbakhsh A, Gheibihayat SM, Askari H, Savardashtaki A, Pirro M, Johnston TP, et al. Statin-regulated phagocytosis and efferocytosis in physiological and pathological conditions. Pharmacol Ther. (2022) 238:108282. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108282

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    48. Fu H, Alabdullah M, Großmann J, Spieler F, Abdosh R, Lutz V, et al. The differential statin effect on cytokine production of monocytes or macrophages is mediated by differential geranylgeranylation-dependent Rac1 activation. Cell Death Dis. (2019) 10:880. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2109-9

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    49. Katsuki S, Lupieri A, Nakano T, Passos LSA, Rogers MA, Becker-Greene D, et al. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) promotes macrophage activation via LDL receptor-independent mechanisms. Circ Res. (2022) 131:873–89. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.121.320056

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    50. Badimon L, Luquero A, Crespo J, Peña E, Borrell-Pages M. PCSK9 and LRP5 in macrophage lipid internalization and inflammation. Cardiovasc Res. (2021) 117:2054–68. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa254

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    51. Stroes ES, Thompson PD, Corsini A, Vladutiu GD, Raal FJ, Ray KK, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy-European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Statement on Assessment, Aetiology and Management. Eur Heart J. (2015) 36:1012–22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv043

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    52. Ward NC, Watts GF, Eckel RH. Statin toxicity. Circ Res. (2019) 124:328–50. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.118.312782

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    53. Okuyama H, Langsjoen PH, Hamazaki T, Ogushi Y, Hama R, Kobayashi T, et al. Statins stimulate atherosclerosis and heart failure: pharmacological mechanisms. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. (2015) 8:189–99. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2015.1011125

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    54. Zhang R, Liu W, Zeng J, Meng J, Jiang H, Wang J, et al. Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 inhibitors for reducing cholesterol absorption. Eur J Med Chem. (2022) 230:114111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114111

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    55. Golub IS, Termeie OG, Kristo S, Schroeder LP, Lakshmanan S, Shafter AM, et al. Major global coronary artery calcium guidelines. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2023) 16:98–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.018

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    56. Jia M, Li Q, Guo J, Shi W, Zhu L, Huang Y, et al. Deletion of BACH1 attenuates atherosclerosis by reducing endothelial inflammation. Circ Res. (2022) 130:1038–55. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.121.319540

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    57. Lv JJ, Wang H, Zhang C, Zhang TJ, Wei HL, Liu ZK, et al. CD147 sparks atherosclerosis by driving M1 phenotype and impairing efferocytosis. Circ Res. (2024) 134:165–85. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.123.323223

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    58. Li XY, Qin T, Zhang PF, Yan WJ, Lei LL, Kuang JY, et al. Weak UVB irradiation promotes macrophage M2 polarization and stabilizes atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. (2022) 15:855–64. doi: 10.1007/s12265-021-10189-7

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    59. Li M, Xin S, Gu R, Zheng L, Hu J, Zhang R, et al. Novel diagnostic biomarkers related to oxidative stress and macrophage ferroptosis in atherosclerosis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2022), 8917947. doi: 10.1155/2022/8917947

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    60. Ginckels P, Holvoet P. Oxidative stress and inflammation in cardiovascular diseases and cancer: role of non-coding RNAs. Yale J Biol Med. (2022) 95:129–52.

    PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

    61. Peng H, Zhu M, Kong W, Tang C, Du J, Huang Y, et al. L-cystathionine protects against oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by oxidized low-density lipoprotein in THP-1-derived macrophages. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1161542. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1161542

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    62. Liu J, Sun Q, Sun M, Lin L, Ren X, Li T, et al. Melatonin alleviates PM(2.5)-triggered macrophage M1 polarization and atherosclerosis via regulating NOX2-mediated oxidative stress homeostasis. Free Radic Biol Med. (2022) 181:166–79. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.02.005

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    63. Ma J, Zhang H, Chen Y, Liu X, Tian J, Shen W. The role of macrophage iron overload and ferroptosis in atherosclerosis. Biomolecules. (2022) 12. doi: 10.3390/biom12111702

    Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    64. Luo X, Wang Y, Zhu X, Chen Y, Xu B, Bai X, et al. MCL attenuates atherosclerosis by suppressing macrophage ferroptosis via targeting KEAP1/NRF2 interaction. Redox Biol. (2024) 69:102987. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102987

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    65. Tao Y, Zhao Q, Lu C, Yong W, Xu M, Wang Z, et al. Melatonin suppresses atherosclerosis by ferroptosis inhibition via activating NRF2 pathway. FASEB J. (2024) 38:e23678. doi: 10.1096/fj.202400427RR

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    66. Wang Y, Liu XY, Wang Y, Zhao WX, Li FD, Guo PR, et al. NOX2 inhibition stabilizes vulnerable plaques by enhancing macrophage efferocytosis via MertK/PI3K/AKT pathway. Redox Biol. (2023) 64:102763. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102763

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    67. Che X, Xiao Q, Song W, Zhang H, Sun B, Geng N, et al. Protective functions of liver X receptor α in established vulnerable plaques: involvement of regulating endoplasmic reticulum-mediated macrophage apoptosis and efferocytosis. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10:e018455. doi: 10.1161/jaha.120.018455

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    68. Qiao L, Ma J, Zhang Z, Sui W, Zhai C, Xu D, et al. Deficient chaperone-mediated autophagy promotes inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2021) 129:1141–57. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.121.318908

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    69. Pan W, Zhang J, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Song Y, Han L, et al. Comprehensive view of macrophage autophagy and its application in cardiovascular diseases. Cell Prolif. (2024) 57:e13525. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13525

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    70. Zhang Z, Yue P, Lu T, Wang Y, Wei Y, Wei X. Role of lysosomes in physiological activities, diseases, and therapy. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14:79. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01087-1

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    71. Fang S, Wan X, Zou X, Sun S, Hao X, Liang C, et al. Arsenic trioxide induces macrophage autophagy and atheroprotection by regulating ROS-dependent TFEB nuclear translocation and AKT/mTOR pathway. Cell Death Dis. (2021) 12:88. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03357-1

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    72. Zhang H, Ge S, Ni B, He K, Zhu P, Wu X, et al. Augmenting ATG14 alleviates atherosclerosis and inhibits inflammation via promotion of autophagosome-lysosome fusion in macrophages. Autophagy. (2021) 17:4218–30. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1909833

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    73. Wang J, Zhao C, Zhang B, Liu X. Macrophage-specific autophagy-related gene HSPB8 is involved in the macrophage polarization in atherosclerosis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2023) 23:141. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03158-2

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    74. Dubland JA, Allahverdian S, Besler KJ, Ortega C, Wang Y, Pryma CS, et al. Low LAL (Lysosomal acid lipase) expression by smooth muscle cells relative to macrophages as a mechanism for arterial foam cell formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2021) 41:e354–68. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.120.316063

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    75. Francis GA. The greatly under-represented role of smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. (2023) 25:741–9. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01145-8

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    76. Pan H, Xue C, Auerbach BJ, Fan J, Bashore AC, Cui J, et al. Single-cell genomics reveals a novel cell state during smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching and potential therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis in mouse and human. Circulation. (2020) 142:2060–75. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.048378

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    77. Tall AR, Thomas DG, Gonzalez-Cabodevilla AG, Goldberg IJ. Addressing dyslipidemic risk beyond LDL-cholesterol. J Clin Invest. (2022) 132. doi: 10.1172/jci148559

    Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    78. Xu Y, Li Y, Jadhav K, Pan X, Zhu Y, Hu S, et al. Hepatocyte ATF3 protects against atherosclerosis by regulating HDL and bile acid metabolism. Nat Metab. (2021) 3:59–74. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-00331-1

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    79. Linton MF, Yancey PG, Tao H, Davies SS. HDL function and atherosclerosis: reactive dicarbonyls as promising targets of therapy. Circ Res. (2023) 132:1521–45. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.123.321563

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    80. He P, Wang H, Cheng S, Hu F, Zhang L, Chen W, et al. Geniposide ameliorates atherosclerosis by regulating macrophage polarization via perivascular adipocyte-derived CXCL14. J Ethnopharmacol. (2023) 314:116532. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116532

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    81. Wang K, Cao Q, Yang Q, Wei Q, Zhao J, Wang Y, et al. Study on the regulatory effect of leech peptide HE-D on macrophages in atherosclerosis by transcriptome sequencing. J Ethnopharmacol. (2022) 294:115380. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115380

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    82. Yu GR, Lee SJ, Kim DH, Lim DW, Kim H, Park WH, et al. Literature-based drug repurposing in traditional chinese medicine: reduced inflammatory M1 macrophage polarization by Jisil Haebaek Gyeji-tang alleviates cardiovascular disease in vitro and ex vivo. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2020), 8881683. doi: 10.1155/2020/8881683

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    83. Ma L, Dai X, Wu C, Li M, Sheng H, Mao W. Tanyu Tongzhi formula delays atherosclerotic plaque progression by promoting alternative macrophage activation via PPARγ and AKT/ERK signal pathway in apoE knock-out mice. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:734589. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.734589

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    84. Wang X, Gao B, Feng Y. Recent advances in inhibiting atherosclerosis and restenosis: from pathogenic factors, therapeutic molecules to nano-delivery strategies. J Mater Chem B. (2022) 10:1685–708. doi: 10.1039/d2tb00003b

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    85. Ji H, Peng R, Jin L, Ma J, Yang Q, Sun D, et al. Recent advances in ROS-sensitive nano-formulations for atherosclerosis applications. Pharmaceutics. (2021) 13. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091452

    Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    86. Zaid A, Ariel A. Harnessing anti-inflammatory pathways and macrophage nano delivery to treat inflammatory and fibrotic disorders. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. (2024) 207:115204. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115204

    Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    87. Wijaya A, Maruf A, Wu W, Wang G. Recent advances in micro- and nano-bubbles for atherosclerosis applications. Biomater Sci. (2020) 8:4920–39. doi: 10.1039/d0bm00762e

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    88. Wang J, Zhang Y, Feng X, Du M, Li S, Chang X, et al. Tanshinone IIA alleviates atherosclerosis in LDLR(-/-) mice by regulating efferocytosis of macrophages. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1233709. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1233709

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    89. Zheng G, Zhao Y, Li Z, Hua Y, Zhang J, Miao Y, et al. GLSP and GLSP-derived triterpenes attenuate atherosclerosis and aortic calcification by stimulating ABCA1/G1-mediated macrophage cholesterol efflux and inactivating RUNX2-mediated VSMC osteogenesis. Theranostics. (2023) 13:1325–41. doi: 10.7150/thno.80250

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    90. Zhou M, Ren P, Li S, Kang Q, Zhang Y, Liu W, et al. Danhong injection attenuates high-fat-induced atherosclerosis and macrophage lipid accumulation by regulating the PI3K/AKT insulin pathway. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. (2019) 74:152–61. doi: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000000691

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    91. Tian Y, Chang S, Xu J, Gong P, Yu B, Qi J. Investigation of the effective components inhibited macrophage foam cell formation in Ophiopogonis Radix. J Ethnopharmacol. (2022) 283:114678. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114678

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    92. Hu B, Xu L, Li Y, Bai X, Xing M, Cao Q, et al. A peptide inhibitor of macrophage migration in atherosclerosis purified from the leech Whitmania pigra. J Ethnopharmacol. (2020) 254:112723. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112723

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    93. Zhang C, Wu X, Shi P, Ma H, Fang F, Feng Q, et al. Diterpenoids inhibit ox-LDL-induced foam cell formation in RAW264.7 cells by promoting ABCA1 mediated cholesterol efflux. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1066758. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1066758

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    94. Lai P, Cao X, Xu Q, Liu Y, Li R, Zhang J, et al. Ganoderma lucidum spore ethanol extract attenuates atherosclerosis by regulating lipid metabolism via upregulation of liver X receptor alpha. Pharm Biol. (2020) 58:760–70. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2020.1798471

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    95. Wei J, Huang L, Li D, He J, Li Y, He F, et al. Total Flavonoids of Engelhardia roxburghiana Wall. Leaves Alleviated Foam Cells Formation through AKT/mTOR-Mediated Autophagy in the Progression of Atherosclerosis. Chem Biodivers. (2021) 18:e2100308. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202100308

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    96. Liang PL, Chen XL, Gong MJ, Xu Y, Tu HS, Zhang L, et al. Guang Chen Pi (the pericarp of Citrus reticulata Blanco's cultivars 'Chachi') inhibits macrophage-derived foam cell formation. J Ethnopharmacol. (2022) 293:115328. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115328

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    97. Zheng S, Huang H, Li Y, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Liang J, et al. Yin-xing-tong-mai decoction attenuates atherosclerosis via activating PPARγ-LXRα-ABCA1/ABCG1 pathway. Pharmacol Res. (2021) 169:105639. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105639

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    98. Zhang J, Wang X, Guan B, Wang X, An X, Wang T, et al. Qing-Xin-Jie-Yu Granule inhibits ferroptosis and stabilizes atherosclerotic plaques by regulating the GPX4/xCT signaling pathway. J Ethnopharmacol. (2023) 301:115852. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115852

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    99. Wang A, Guan B, Shao C, Zhao L, Li Q, Hao H, et al. Qing-Xin-Jie-Yu Granule alleviates atherosclerosis by reshaping gut microbiota and metabolic homeostasis of ApoE-/- mice. Phytomedicine. (2022) 103:154220. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154220

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    100. Li Y, Zhang L, Ren P, Yang Y, Li S, Qin X, et al. Qing-Xue-Xiao-Zhi formula attenuates atherosclerosis by inhibiting macrophage lipid accumulation and inflammatory response via TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway regulation. Phytomedicine. (2021) 93:153812. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153812

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    101. Ye H, Wang G, Wang X, Wang L, Ni W, Chen L, et al. San-wei-tan-xiang capsule attenuates atherosclerosis by increasing lysosomal activity in adipose tissue macrophages. J Ethnopharmacol. (2023) 312:116444. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116444

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    102. Zhou M, Ren P, Zhang Y, Li S, Li M, Li P, et al. Shen-yuan-dan capsule attenuates atherosclerosis and foam cell formation by enhancing autophagy and inhibiting the PI3K/akt/mTORC1 signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol. (2019) 10:603. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00603

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    103. Chen M, Huang R, Fu W, Ou L, Men L, Zhang Z, et al. Xiaoyaosan (Tiaogan-Liqi therapy) protects peritoneal macrophages from corticosterone-induced stress by regulating the interaction between glucocorticoid receptor and ABCA1. Ann Transl Med. (2020) 8:1506. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6505

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    104. Jia D, Zhao M, Zhang X, Cheng X, Wei Q, Lou L, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals the critical role of chemokine signaling in the anti-atherosclerosis effect of Xuefu Zhuyu decoction. J Ethnopharmacol. (2024) 332:118245. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118245

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    105. Zhang J, Wang D, Zhang X, Yang J, Chai X, Wang Y. Application of “spider-web” mode in discovery and identification of Q-markers from Xuefu Zhuyu capsule. Phytomedicine. (2020) 77:153273. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153273

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    106. Han W, Zhang D, Zhang P, Tao Q, Du X, Yu C, et al. Danlou Recipe promotes cholesterol efflux in macrophages RAW264.7 and reverses cholesterol transport in mice with hyperlipidemia induced by P407. BMC Complement Med Ther. (2023) 23:445. doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04253-9

    PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

    Keywords: atherosclerosis, polarization of M1/M2 macrophages, targeted macrophage therapy, formation of atherosclerosis, source of macrophages

    Citation: Zhang LN, Li JW, Kou YS, Shen LF, Wang H, Wang YY, Ma RL, Wu T, Yang X, Gu YH and Yi L (2024) Mechanisms and treatment of atherosclerosis: focus on macrophages. Front. Immunol. 15:1490387. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1490387

    Received: 03 September 2024; Accepted: 09 October 2024;
    Published: 06 November 2024.

    Edited by:

    Vinay Kumar, The Pennsylvania State University, United States

    Reviewed by:

    Shivani Srivastava, Yale University, United States
    Vishakha Anand Pawar, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States

    Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Li, Kou, Shen, Wang, Wang, Ma, Wu, Yang, Gu and Yi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    *Correspondence: Lin Yi, eWlsaW5AZ3N6eS5lZHUuY24=; YuanHui Gu, Z3V5dWFuaEAxNjMuY29t

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.