Concetta D’Antonio
Giovanna L. Liguori- Institute of Genetics and Biophysics (IGB) “Adriano Buzzati-Traverso”, National Research Council (CNR) of Italy, Naples, Italy
Cancer cell dormancy is a reversible process whereby cancer cells enter a quiescent state characterized by cell cycle arrest, inhibition of cell migration and invasion, and increased chemoresistance. Because of its reversibility and resistance to treatment, dormancy is a key process to study, monitor, and interfere with, in order to prevent tumor recurrence and metastasis and improve the prognosis of cancer patients. However, to achieve this goal, further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this complex and dynamic dual process. Here, we review the contribution of extracellular vesicles (EVs) to the regulation of cancer cell dormancy/awakening, focusing on the cross-talk between tumor and non-tumor cells in both the primary tumor and the (pre-)metastatic niche. Although EVs are recognized as key players in tumor progression and metastasis, as well as in tumor diagnostics and therapeutics, their role specifically in dormancy induction/escape is still largely elusive. We report on the most recent and promising results on this topic, focusing on the EV-associated nucleic acids involved. We highlight how EV studies could greatly contribute to the identification of dormancy signaling pathways and a dormancy/early awakening signature for the development of successful diagnostic/prognostic and therapeutic approaches.
1 Introduction
In tumorigenesis, two different levels of dormancy have been distinguished so far. The first level, called tumor dormancy, was first proposed by Judah Folkman in the early 1970s and indicates the whole tumor mass maintaining an overall constant size possibly due to a balance between cell proliferation and death (1, 2). The second level, called cancer cell dormancy or quiescence is a process whereby individual tumor cells inside the tumor enter a state of cell cycle arrest (3). Cancer cell entry into a dormant state can occur at any stage of cancer progression, even the ones characterized by fast tumor growth, and in different types of tumors, including the highly aggressive and metastatic cancers (4, 5). In this Review we will explore the dormancy at a cellular level. Besides cell cycle arrest, dormant cancer cells are also characterized by the acquisition of stemness, mesenchymal and chemotolerance features and the activation of the related signaling pathways, involving Notch, Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ)as well as Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) receptors, and the Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox (ZEB2) transcription factor (6–10). Dormant cancer cells resemble, and in some cases, overlap with quiescent/slow proliferating cancer stem cells, thus suggesting that they are different metastable states, rather than separate entities, along the same cell continuum (10). Stemness pathways activated in dormant cells can be also active in quiescent/slow-proliferating cancer stem cells and even in quiescent normal stem cells, such as the long-term hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs). LT-HSCs are a subset of HSCs that remain quiescent to guarantee the existence of an HSC pool and the continuous production of blood cells throughout an individual’s lifetime (11). Interestingly, the hematopoietic cell kinase, normally expressed in the lymphoid and myeloid lineages of hemopoiesis (12), has been found to be enriched in dormant leukemia cells, interfering with the maturation of the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3) and causing abnormal Flt3 signaling (13).
Dormancy is not associated to gene mutations, but to a specific epigenetic signature. Indeed, it is a reversible process, which means that quiescent cancer cells can awake in every moment, even after many years, and restart proliferating giving rise according to the specific context to the primary tumor, to tumor relapse after excision and or (chemo)therapy, or to formation of metastasis at distant sites (8, 10). In both melanoma and glioblastoma (GB) a restricted and relatively quiescent subset of cancer cells was identified as responsible for sustained long-term tumor growth (14, 15). In addition to these two tumors, dormancy/reawakening balance has been mainly identified in breast and prostate cancer cells, as well as in brain, liver, lung and bone metastatic niche (16–19). The discovery of tumor quiescence revolutionized the concept of tumor progression and metastasis, suggesting that the initial mutations that give rise to cancer cells, as well as the dissemination of cancer cells to distant sites, may precede the onset of tumor and metastasis respectively, even by many years (20–23). The therapy resistance and the reversibility that characterize dormant state make it extremely important to monitor and crucial to regulate with the perspective to contrast tumor initiation, progression, relapse and metastasis.
Tumor microenvironment plays a key role in regulating cancer cell dormancy/awakening at both primary tumor and (pre-)metastatic sites. Premetastatic niche are actively formed by extracellular signals emanating from the primary tumors, which modify the microenvironment at distant sites, rendering it supportive for survival and outgrowth of circulating tumor cells long before their arrival, colonization and engraftment (24, 25). Studies on the pre-metastatic niche highlighted that dormancy is a very specific process, supported by a unique microenvironment specific to each cancer type (19, 23). As an example, the microvascular endothelium is able to induce dormancy in disseminated breast cancer cells, whereas the osteoblastic niche can promote quiescence of prostate cancer and multiple myeloma cells (26–29). In each niche, specific factors are involved in dormancy induction, released by non-tumor cells, such as stromal, endothelial and immune cells, as well as present in the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) (30–33). ECM components such as thrombospondin-1 and osteopontin have been associated to induction of dormancy in disseminated tumor cells (DTCs), respectively in the perivascular and osteoblastic niches (26, 34). Induction of DTC quiescency can be also mediated by soluble factors, including the growth arrest-specific protein 6 (GAS6), Transforming Growth Factor β2 (TGFβ2), bone morphogenetic protein 4 and 7 (BMP4 and 7) (16, 35–37). Soluble and ECM factors cooperate in regulation of quiescence, as shown for the ECM component fibronectin, whose production is dependent from the cancer-secreted TGFβ2 which is able to induce DTC quiescence (38). However, despite the fact that each niche microenvironment uses specific factors to induce quiescence in cancer cells, the downstream intracellular signaling pathways commonly activated are the ERK signaling, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) activated Src-dependent signaling, endoplasmic reticulum stress, VCAM1, Wnt and BMP-dependent signaling (19, 32, 33, 37, 39, 40).
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are key components of the tumor microenvironment and (pre-)metastatic niche, being produced by both tumor and non-tumor cells and being able to transport active molecules, such as DNAs, RNAs (mRNAs, lncRNAs and miRNAs), proteins, lipids and metabolites to target cells (both tumoral and non), thereby influencing their state (41, 42). EVs can be closely associated with tissues or the ECM, and are referred to as tissue-derived EVs (Ti-EVs) or matrix-bound vesicles (MBVs) (87, 88). Finally, EVs can be also transported in body fluids reaching target sites at very long distance from the producing cells, with relevant diagnostic and therapeutic implications (41, 42). Based on their biogenesis, two main types of vesicles have been defined: the exosomes, which are formed in multivesicular bodies inside cells and then secreted outside, and the microvesicles or ectosomes, which originate from cell membrane budding (89). During tumor development, EVs have been shown to play a key role in many processes related to cell communication, being involved in the induction of stemness, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), proliferation, migration, chemoresistance and metastasis formation (42, 43, 90). However, the specific contribution of EVs to the induction and regulation of tumor quiescence is still in its infancy. Therefore, our review article aims to explore the impact of EVs on the dormancy/awakening balance by summarizing more relevant and recent studies on this topic, and discuss the potentiality in using EVs for theranostic dormancy/awakening targeting approaches.
2 The contribution of extracellular vesicles to dormancy/awakening balance
A complete characterization of dormant cancer cells has not yet been achieved, so it is challenging to clearly assess the contribution of external signals, including EVs, to dormancy induction. Here we collect evidence on the ability of EVs released by non-tumoral cells in the tumor or (pre-)metastatic niche, such as stromal, immune and endothelial cells, to promote one or more features related to dormancy. The ability of the tumor microenvironment cells to regulate dormancy/awakening balance is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The extracellular vesicle-mediated cross-talk in the regulation of cancer cell dormancy and awakening. Cancer cell dormancy is a reversible process. Non-tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment as well as at the (pre-)metastatic site, including endothelial, stromal and immune cells, produce extracellular vesicles (EVs) capable of inducing cancer cell dormant (green) as well as awakening (red) state. Pro-dormancy EVs (shown in green) target cancer cells and induce the activation of intracellular pathways leading to arrest of cell proliferation, migration and invasion together to increased chemoresistance. Pro-awakening vesicles (shown in red) act on dormant tumor cells, inducing the escape from quiescence, with increased cell proliferation and migration, the ability to invade other tissues as well as acquired chemosensitivity. The EV cargo capable of shifting the balance between dormant and awakening state is also highlighted. miR-9-3p, miR-31 and miR-126 are among the microRNAs able of promoting dormancy of cancer cells, whereas mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the MALAT1 long non-coding RNA induce cancer cell awakening. Cancer cells, in turn, produce EVs that act on non-tumor cells stimulating the production and release of primed EVs, that can both induce and reverse the dormancy process.
Several in vitro studies have addressed the ability of stromal EV cargo to decrease tumorigenic features, such as proliferation, migration, and invasion, and induce a quiescent-like and highly chemoresistant state in cancer cells. Among the different types, metastatic breast cancer cells (BCCs) have been extensively studied, due to the clinical evidence of very late relapses. EV released by stromal cells (fibroblasts and cancer associated fibroblasts or CAFs) have been shown to target BCCs, causing the increase of chemoresistance through activation of Stat1 and Notch3 signaling pathways (44). Similarly, EVs released by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) are uptaken by BCCs, causing reduction of cell proliferation, migration and invasion, enhanced adhesion, increased chemoresistance and the decrease of stem cell-like markers on the cell membrane (45, 46). In most cases the effect is due to EV transfer of specific miRNAs between stromal and cancer cells; the most relevant miRNAs identified have been summarized in Table 1. BM-MSC derived EV miR-23b downregulates the expression of the gene encoding the myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) protein, which in turn promotes cell cycling and motility (45). Other stromal EV-associated miRNAs, miR-31 and 205, suppress the metastatic potential of BCCs by repressing the gene encoding Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme E2 N (UBE2N/Ubc13), that is involved in cell proliferation, migration and invasion ( (47).
Table 1. EV-RNAs released from non-tumor cells and involved in cancer cell dormancy/awakening.
Further studies reported that exposure to BCCs does influence the cargo composition of EVs released by BM-MSCs and can be involved itself in the induction of cycling quiescence and early cancer dormancy (48, 54). A stepwise dormancy process was proposed in which early naive EVs released from BM-MSCs began the BCC transition into cycling quiescence and their reorganization into distinct cell subsets, whereas BCC-primed MSC-derived EVs target a subset of cancer cells and complete the process towards dedifferentiation and acquisition of stemness properties (54). Specific miRNAs (miR-127, miR-197, miR-222/223) found in primed MSC-EVs have been associated with reduced proliferation, and induction of cancer cell dormancy and chemoresistance (48). Studies using liver microphysiological system as a model to recapitulate the early metastatic events also highlighted a timely controlled cross-talk between the hepatic niche and BCCs enabling first liver seeding and then reduced tumor outgrowth and cancer cell entry into dormancy at the metastatic site. Hepatic EVs were able to reduce cancer cell proliferation and invasion and concomitantly revert the EMT, with induction of epithelial markers such as E-cadherin and Zonula Occludens-1 (ZO-1) and the acquisition of an epithelial-like morphology (55). Bone marrow-mesenchymal EVs have been shown to target not only BCCs, but also other types of cancer cells, both solid (bladder cancer) and liquid (chronic myelogenous leukemia), inducing cycling quiescence and increased drug resistance. This activity is mediated by EV miRNAs transfer, in particular miR-9-3p for bladder cancer and miR-300 for leukemia (49, 50).
Noteworthily, MSCs can also release awakening signals able to revert the quiescence process (Figure 1). Several studies point to the ability of tumor derived EVs (TDEVs) to condition MSCs and stromal cells to release in the microenvironment pro-tumorigenic signals, such as interleukins (ILs) 6 and 8, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and monocyte-chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), to stimulate angiogenesis and immune suppression, and then supporting cancer cell proliferation and survival (23, 42). EV packaging and transfer of mitochondrial DNA from CAFs to metastatic BCCs is able to induce exit from dormancy through estrogen receptor-independent oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (56). Interestingly, teratocarcinoma-derived EVs have been shown to inhibit migration of GB cells in vitro (57), suggesting that TDEVs could also directly target cancer cells contributing to the induction of a dormant-like state.
Very few data are available on the implication of non-stromal (endothelial and immune) EV cargo in the induction of cancer cell quiescence. Bone marrow endothelial EVs have been shown to transfer miR-126 to leukemia cells, thus supporting quiescence, as well as prolonged risk of cancer relapse and worst prognosis (51). Endothelial EVs seem, instead, more involved in cancer cell awakening. In most cases, in fact, endothelial cells in the tumor niche are conditioned by TDEVs, to release EVs carrying pro-tumorigenic factors, which enhance in turn cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion (23, 42). In mouse models of tumorigenesis, endothelial EVs were shown to target glioma or metastatic breast cancer, enhancing cancer cell self-renewal and proliferation (52, 58). Very recently, endothelial EVs have been shown to protect tumor dormant cells by T cell mediated immunosuppression, by inducing their reactivation or awakening through transfer of the lncRNA MALAT1. MALAT1 causes activation of Wnt pathway and induction of Serpin protease inhibitors, thus suppressing immunogenic cell death in the incipient metastatic cells (52, 53).
Similarly, only few studies pointed to an implication of immune EV cargo in dormancy induction. As an example, EVs released from pro-tumorigenic M2, but interestingly not anti-tumoral M1, macrophages were able to induce cycling quiescence and drug resistance in BCCs (59). Instead, preceding metastatic outgrowth, TDEVs can target immune cells and induce an immunotolerant microenvironment in which dormant cells can awaken and start proliferating, by blocking myeloid and lymphoid differentiation, promoting pro-tumorigenic M2 macrophage polarization, and/or inducing the expansion of immunosuppressive cells like Treg lymphocytes (60, 61).
Finally, we would highlight that EVs might promote cancer cell dormancy/awakening also indirectly, through complex regulatory networks involving other EV-mediated processes such as autophagy, ECM remodeling, inflammation or hypoxia stress, that are ones of the main triggers of cancer cell quiescence (62). For instance, dormant cancer cells can survive in hypoxic and nutrient deficient tumor microenvironments through autophagic processes (63), as well as they are able to reorganize fibronectin in the ECM to maintain dormancy in breast cancer cell lines (38).
3 Diagnostic and therapeutic EV significance to detect/regulate cancer dormancy
EV-associated molecules, including proteins, lipids and nucleic acids, can serve as reliable biomarkers for early-stage cancer detection and classification (41, 42, 64). Therefore, defining EV signatures related to tumor dormancy or early awakening might be crucial to monitor cancer progression, including the risk of late relapses and metastasis. In particular, the possibility of amplifying and coupling miRNAs with high-throughput multiplexed RNA profiling, make miRNAs extremely interesting for theranostic purposes. EV-associated miRNAs listed above and in Table 1 might be interesting markers to follow in circulating EVs, being their increase in tumor and (pre-)metastatic microenvironment, and body fluids potentially associated to cancer cell dormancy/awakening balance. Moreover, different TDEV-miRNAs, including miR-19a, miR-21, miR-141 and miR-375, have been found associated to cancer relapse and metastasis, both in vitro and in vivo, thus being potential candidate biomarkers to follow (23, 65–67). However, the low number of dormant cells is an obvious limitation that may affect the sensitivity of liquid biopsy. Tissue and matrix bound vesicles could also be useful, as they may better reflect the pathological state of the primary tumor or (pre-)metastatic niche compared to biofluid EVs. Unfortunately, their isolation is less immediate and more invasive, requiring tissue or matrix isolation and dissociation by enzymatic digestion. However, the study of Ti-EVs and MBVs could help to assess a dormant/pro-awakening EV signature, which could then be investigated by EV analysis via liquid biopsy.
The best therapeutic options to target dormancy and therefore avoid tumor relapse or metastasis are still controversial. The different approaches can be subdivided into four treatment strategies, in some cases based on divergent principles, here summarized: (i) induction of maintenance of cancer cells in a quiescent state throughout the life of the patient, also defined as the “sleeping strategy”, or at the opposite (ii) controlled reactivation of dormant cells to overcome drug tolerance, the so called “awakening strategy”, (iii) inhibition of dormancy, and (iv) elimination of dormant cancer cells from patient’s body (8, 32). The maintenance of dormancy or sleeping strategy is probably the most logical one. The strategy involves the repression of the proliferation signaling pathways (mediated by β1-integrin, uPAR, ERK and Src kinases), the induction of intrinsic dormancy factors, such as the kinases DYRK1A and p38 MAPK, or extrinsic signals produced by the pre-metastatic dormant niche, including GAS6, TGF-β2, BMP4 and 7 and Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), which is currently being evaluated in a clinical trial for the therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (NCT03572387) (8). However, and not secondarily, the sleeping strategy has the great disadvantage of requiring prolonged treatment for the whole life of the patient.
As the opposite, both the awakening approach and the inhibition of dormancy would involve the targeting of dormancy-promoting factors released in the microenvironment (e.g., using neutralizing antibodies against osteopontin) (34) or by inhibiting specific kinases able to induce cell cycle arrest and quiescence (68, 69). The use of these molecules strongly enhances the effect of drugs targeting the proliferative cells, and could potentially being used for combination therapy (8). Last, but not least, the elimination of dormant cancer cells is probably the most translational strategy and can be achieved through administration of different substances such as antibiotics (mithramycin), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (linsitinib), or phosphorylation inhibitors (oligomycin) (8). The ideal therapy should be able to efficiently target dormant cancer cells, while sparing the patient’s quiescent normal stem cells, such as LT-HSCs. Therefore, the identification of differentially expressed molecules and differentially activated pathways between quiescent cancer and normal stem cells is fundamental for the development of safe and efficient targeting approaches.
Finally, the strong limitation of all the approaches described is that in case of efficiency less than 100%, the cells that escape the treatment could show a more malignant phenotype, worsening the patient prognosis.
EV exploitation might be extremely useful for developing new suitable anti-cancer therapeutic approaches with increased efficacy and efficiency (43, 70–72). First of all, EV cargo associated with dormancy/awakening induction (Table 1) could be promising targets to be blocked. As an example, in vivo targeting of the EV-miR-222/223 associated to BCC dormancy was able to reverse the quiescence process in BCCs, increasing their chemosensitivity and increasing mouse model survival (48). Second, EVs could be extremely useful as biological nanocarriers to deliver anti-dormancy or anti-proliferative drugs, depending on the strategy chosen, as well as to target specific dormancy/awakening factors within cancer dormant cells. EVs derived from different sources are suitable natural drug-delivery vectors, due to their high biocompatibility and safety, ability to cross the physiological boundaries and high immunotolerance (73–77). EVs might be instrumental for all the types of strategies, through engineering with the molecule to deliver, prolonging the half-life and even the efficiency of the carried molecules, respect to the soluble ones. Moreover, membrane functionalization and eventual biomimetic designing (78, 79) might help in recognizing and targeting specific cancer dormant cells through specific cell marker interactions.
4 Discussion
As shown in the Figure 1, duality strongly characterizes the dormancy induction process: (i) cancer cells can exist both in an active (or awakened) and a dormant state, (ii) the switching from one state to the other is reversible, (iii) the non-tumor cells in the primary tumor or (pre-)metastatic niche can release both pro-dormancy and pro-awakening EVs, and (iv) cancer cells can condition non-tumor cells of the microenvironment to release both type of EV-associated signals.
All these features made us think of the dual character par excellence, namely Dr. Jekill and Mr. Hyde. The transformation of Dr. Jekill in Mr. Hyde is reversible, induced by opposing extrinsic factors (the potion and its antidote). At this metaphoric level, EVs, together with other extrinsic factors, such as soluble or ECM-bound molecules, would function as potion as well as antidote to shift the balance between dormant (Dr. Jekill) and awakening (Mr. Hyde) cells, as highlighted in Figure 1. Just as Dr. Jekyll had a hidden malignant nature that fully manifested itself when he became Mr. Hyde, so dormant cancer cells retain the malignant potential to resume proliferation, upon awakening, leading to tumor recurrence or metastasis to distant sites. The high persistence and drug resistance that characterizes dormancy, together with the unpredictable intrinsic risk of awakening, leading to tumor relapse and/or metastasis, make dormant cancer cells not properly safe and harmless. Dormancy allows cancer cells to evade the highly selective drug pressure as well as the immune response, to survive in an hostile environment and to awaken in more favorable conditions, leading to tumor or metastasis growth (8). Moreover, it has been intriguingly proposed that cancer dormancy is an intelligent adaptive behavior that prolongs the life of the host and then of the cancer itself (80). Quiescence could be the adaptive response of cancer cells to treatment with antitumor drugs, most of which target actively proliferating cells. For this reason, both non tumor and tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment and the (pre-)metastatic niche can release factors, including EVs, able to induce or reverse cancer cell dormancy, being both processes functional for cancer persistence and progression. Related to this, therapeutic approaches are also dualistic, involving the development of both sleeping and awakening strategies to reach the same goal, that is prevent tumor relapse and improve patient prognosis.
In this intriguing scenario, the identification of dormancy-associated molecules and related regulatory mechanisms would be crucial for both diagnostics and therapeutics. At the diagnostic level, these molecules could serve as reliable biomarkers for the specific detection of dormant cells before or at very early stages of re-awakening, while at the therapeutic level they could represent potential targets to be blocked in order to prevent tumor relapse. In both cases, approaches based on EV exploitation could be extremely useful. Since EVs are detectable in almost all body fluids, diagnostic methods based on liquid biopsy and sequential quantitative and qualitative analysis of EVs would be of great help in non-invasive monitoring of disease-free cancer patients. However, to move in this direction, current limitations in the standardization and reproducibility of analytical methods to identify and possibly sort EVs specifically associated with a particular feature or released by a particular cell subset need to be carefully addressed. From a therapeutic point of view, EVs could be extremely useful as drug delivery vectors in a targeted approach. To realize these strategies, more reliable and sustainable sources of EVs (not only MSCs, but also milk, plants and microalgae) have been identified, together with improvements in the associated techniques for EV isolation, engineering and delivery. Significant efforts have been made by the international EV community to standardize procedures and methodologies and to identify commonly agreed strategies at each level of the pipeline, from basic research to diagnostic and therapeutic applications (81–85) In addition, various EV-based biotechs and spin-offs have been established to exploit EV research (86). Ongoing work is likely to improve current knowledge of the contribution of EVs to dormancy/awakening fine-tuning, and to stimulate novel EV-based theranostic solutions, with the desirable goal of improving the prognosis and living conditions of cancer patients.
Author contributions
CD’A: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. GL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU—under the CEVITA project within the framework of the AMICO 2 program of CNR—UVR supported by the PoC—PNRR measure of the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ann Zeuner, whose brilliant and stimulating seminar on the subject opened up new research perspectives. The authors would also like to thank Mariarosaria Aletta for her bibliographic assistance and Anna Maria Aliperti for English editing.
Conflict of interest
GL has filed the patent PCT/IB2023/053735 related to the use of lipidic vesicles for the treatment of aggressive tumors.
The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Gimbrone MA, Leapman SB, Cotran RS, Folkman J. Tumor dormancy in vivo by prevention of neovascularization. J Exp Med. (1972) 136:261–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.2.261
3. Sosa MS, Bragado P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Mechanisms of disseminated cancer cell dormancy: An awakening field. Nat Rev Cancer. (2014) 14:611–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc3793
4. Prager BC, Bhargava S, Mahadev V, Hubert CG, Rich JN. Glioblastoma stem cells: driving resilience through chaos. Trends Cancer. (2020) 6:223–35. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.01.009
5. Shepherd TG, Dick FA. Principles of dormancy evident in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cell Div. (2022) 17:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13008-022-00079-y
6. Abravanel DL, Belka GK, Pan TC, Pant DK, Collins MA, Sterner CJ, et al. Notch promotes recurrence of dormant tumor cells following HER2/neu-targeted therapy. J Clin Invest. (2015) 125:2484–96. doi: 10.1172/JCI74883
7. Liau BB, Sievers C, Donohue LK, Gillespie SM, Flavahan WA, Miller TE, et al. Adaptive chromatin remodeling drives glioblastoma stem cell plasticity and drug tolerance. Cell Stem Cell. (2017) 20:233–246.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.003
8. Recasens A, Munoz L. Targeting cancer cell dormancy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2019) 40:128–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2018.12.004
9. Francescangeli F, Contavalli P, De Angelis ML, Careccia S, Signore M, Haas TL, et al. A pre-existing population of ZEB2+ quiescent cells with stemness and mesenchymal features dictate chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2020) 39:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1505-4
10. Francescangeli F, De Angelis ML, Rossi R, Cuccu A, Giuliani A, De Maria R, et al. Dormancy, stemness, and therapy resistance: interconnected players in cancer evolution. Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2023) 42:197–215. doi: 10.1007/s10555-023-10092-4
11. Nakamura-Ishizu A, Takizawa H, Suda T. The analysis, roles and regulation of quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. Dev. (2014) 141:4656–66. doi: 10.1242/dev.106575
12. Quintrell N, Lebo R, Varmus H, Bishop JM, Pettenati MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. Identification of a human gene (HCK) that encodes a protein-tyrosine kinase and is expressed in hemopoietic cells. Mol Cell Biol. (1987) 7:2267–75. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.6.2267
13. Saito Y, Kitamura H, Hijikata A, Tomizawa-Murasawa M, Tanaka S, Takagi S, et al. Identification of therapeutic targets for quiescent, chemotherapy-resistant human leukemia stem cells. Sci Transl Med. (2010) 2. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000349
14. Roesch A, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Schmidt EC, Zabierowski SE, Brafford PA, Vultur A, et al. A temporarily distinct subpopulation of slow-cycling melanoma cells is required for continuous tumor growth. Cell. (2010) 141:583–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.020
15. Chen J, Li Y, Yu TS, McKay RM, Burns DK, Kernie SG, et al. A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy. Nature. (2012) 488:522–6. doi: 10.1038/nature11287
16. Kobayashi A, Okuda H, Xing F, Pandey PR, Watabe M, Hirota S, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 7 in dormancy and metastasis of prostate cancer stem-like cells in bone. J Exp Med. (2011) 208:2641–55. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110840
17. Cappariello A, Rucci N. Extracellular vesicles in bone tumors: how to seed in the surroundings molecular information for Malignant transformation and progression. Front Oncol. (2021) 11:722922. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722922
18. Attaran S, Bissell MJ. The role of tumor microenvironment and exosomes in dormancy and relapse. Semin Cancer Biol. (2022) 78:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.09.008
19. Pontis F, Roz L, Fortunato O, Bertolini G. The metastatic niche formation: focus on extracellular vesicle-mediated dialogue between lung cancer cells and the microenvironment. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1116783. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1116783
20. Udagawa T. Tumor dormancy of primary and secondary cancers. Apmis. (2008) 116:615–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.01077.x
21. Harper KL, Sosa MS, Entenberg D, Hosseini H, Cheung JF, Nobre R, et al. Mechanism of early dissemination and metastasis in Her2+ mammary cancer. Nature. (2016) 540:588–92. doi: 10.1038/nature20609
22. Suhail Y, Cain MP, Vanaja K, Kurywchak PA, Levchenko A, Kalluri R, et al. Systems biology of cancer metastasis. Cell Syst. (2019) 9:109–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.07.003
23. Hernández-Barranco A, Nogués L, Peinado H. Could extracellular vesicles contribute to generation or awakening of “Sleepy. Metastatic Niches? Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9:625221. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.625221
24. Peinado H, Lavotshkin S, Lyden D. The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: Old sayings and new thoughts. Semin Cancer Biol. (2011) 21:139–46. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.01.002
25. Peinado H, Zhang H, Matei IR, Costa-Silva B, Hoshino A, Rodrigues G, et al. Pre-metastatic niches: organ-specific homes for metastases. Nat Rev Cancer. (2017) 17:302–17. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.6
26. Ghajar CM, Peinado H, Mori H, Matei IR, Evason KJ, Brazier H, et al. The perivascular niche regulates breast tumour dormancy. Nat Cell Biol. (2013) 15:807–17. doi: 10.1038/ncb2767
27. Yu-Lee LY, Yu G, Lee YC, Lin SC, Pan J, Pan T, et al. Osteoblast-secreted factors mediate dormancy of metastatic prostate cancer in the bone via activation of the TGFbRIII–p38MAPK–pS249/ T252RB pathway. Cancer Res. (2018) 78:2911–24. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1051
28. Khoo WH, Ledergor G, Weiner A, Roden DL, Terry RL, McDonald MM, et al. A niche-dependent myeloid transcriptome signature defines dormant myeloma cells. Blood. (2019) 134:30–43. doi: 10.1182/blood.2018880930
29. Liu R, Su S, Xing J, Liu K, Zhao Y, Stangis M, et al. Tumor removal limits prostate cancer cell dissemination in bone and osteoblasts induce cancer cell dormancy through focal adhesion kinase. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2023) 42:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02849-0
30. Bissell MJ, Hines WC. Why don’t we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nat Med. (2011) 17:320–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.2328.Why
31. Ghajar CM. Metastasis prevention by targeting the dormant niche. Nat.Rev.Cancer. (2015) 15:238–47. doi: 10.1038/nrc3910
32. Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Translating the science of cancer dormancy to the clinic. Cancer Res. (2021) 81:4673–5. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1407
33. Liu R, Zhao Y, Su S, Kwabil A, Njoku PC, Yu H, et al. Unveiling cancer dormancy: Intrinsic mechanisms and extrinsic forces. Cancer Lett. (2024) 591:216899. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216899
34. Boyerinas B, Zafrir M, Yesilkanal AE, Price TT, Hyjek EM, Sipkins DA. Adhesion to osteopontin in the bone marrow niche regulates lymphoblastic leukemia cell dormancy. Blood. (2013) 121:4821–31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-475483
35. Shiozawa Y, Pienta KJ, Taichman RS. Hematopoietic stem cell niche is a potential therapeutic target for bone metastatic tumors. Clin Cancer Res. (2011) 1:5553–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2505.Hematopoietic
36. Bragado P, Sosa MS, Keely P, Condeelis J, Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Microenvironments dictating tumor cell dormancy. Recent Results Cancer Res. (2012) 195:25–39. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28160-0_3
37. Gao H, Chakraborty G, Lee-Lim AP, Mo Q, Decker M, Vonica A, et al. The BMP inhibitor Coco reactivates breast cancer cells at lung metastatic sites. Cell. (2012) 150:764–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.035
38. Barney LE, Hall CL, Schwartz AD, Parks AN, Sparages C, Galarza S, et al. Tumor cell-organized fibronectin maintenance of a dormant breast cancer population. Sci Adv. (2020) 6:1–12. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4157
39. Chen Q, Zhang XHF, Massagué J. Macrophage binding to receptor VCAM-1 transmits survival signals in breast cancer cells that invade the lungs. Cancer Cell. (2011) 20:538–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.025
40. Park SY, Nam JS. The force awakens: metastatic dormant cancer cells. Exp Mol Med. (2020) 52:569–81. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0423-z
41. Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. (2020) 367. doi: 10.1126/science.aau6977
42. Mantile F, Franco P, Stoppelli MP, Liguori GL. Biological role and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles as key mediators of cell communication in cancer. In: Biological membrane vesicles: scientific, biotechnological and clinical considerations. Advances in biomembranes and lipid self-assembly. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsiever (2020). doi: 10.1016/bs.abl.2020.05.006
43. Liguori GL, Kralj-Iglič V. Pathological and therapeutic significance of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles in cancer cell migration and metastasis. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15:1–23. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184425
44. Boelens MC, Wu TJ, Nabet BY, Xu B, Qiu Y, Yoon T, et al. Exosome transfer from stromal to breast cancer cells regulates therapy resistance pathways. Cell. (2014) 159:499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.051
45. Ono M, Kosaka N, Tominaga N, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Takahashi R, et al. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells contain a microRNA that promotes dormancy in metastatic breast cancer cells. Sci Signal. (2014) 7:ra63–3. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005231
46. Casson J, Davies OG, Smith CA, Dalby MJ, Berry CC. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles may promote breast cancer cell dormancy. J Tissue Eng. (2018) 9. doi: 10.1177/2041731418810093
47. Vallabhaneni KC, Penfornis P, Xing F, Hassler Y, Adams KV, Mo YY, et al. Stromal cell extracellular Vesicular cargo mediated regulation of Breast Cancer cell Metastasis Via Ubiquitin conjugating Enzyme E2 N pathway. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:109861–76. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22371
48. Bliss SA, Sinha G, Sandiford OA, Williams LM, Engelberth DJ, Guiro K, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes stimulate cycling quiescence and early breast cancer dormancy in bone marrow. Cancer Res. (2016) 76:5832–44. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1092
49. Cai H, Yang X, Gao Y, Xu Z, Yu B, Xu T, et al. Exosomal microRNA-9-3p secreted from BMSCs downregulates ESM1 to suppress the development of bladder cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. (2019) 18:787–800. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.09.023
50. Silvestri G, Trotta R, Stramucci L, Ellis JJ, Harb JG, Neviani P, et al. Persistence of drug-resistant leukemic stem cells and impaired NK cell immunity in CML patients depend on MIR300 antiproliferative and PP2A-activating functions. Blood Cancer Discovery. (2020) 1:48–67. doi: 10.1158/2643-3249.bcd-19-0039
51. Zhang B, Nguyen LXT, Li L, Zhao D, Kumar B, Wu H, et al. Bone marrow niche trafficking of miR-126 controls the self-renewal of leukemia stem cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Nat Med. (2018) 24:450–62. doi: 10.1038/nm.4499
52. Kumar D, Gurrapu S, Wang Y, Bae S-Y, Pandey PR, Chen H, et al. LncRNA Malat1 suppresses pyroptosis and T cell-mediated killing of incipient metastatic cells. Nat Cancer. (2024) 5:262–82. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00695-9
53. Zhang Z, Lieberman J. MALAT1 protects dormant tumor cells from immune elimination. Nat Cancer. (2024) 5:218–20. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00682-0
54. Sandiford OA, Donnelly RJ, El-Far MH, Burgmeyer LM, Sinha G, Pamarthi SH, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Secreted Extracellular Vesicles Instruct Stepwise Dedifferentiation of Breast Cancer Cells into Dormancy at the Bone Marrow Perivascular Region. Cancer Res. (2021) 81:1567–82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-2434
55. Dioufa N, Clark AM, Ma B, Beckwitt CH, Wells A. Bi-directional exosome-driven intercommunication between the hepatic niche and cancer cells. Mol Cancer. (2017) 16:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0740-6
56. Sansone P, Savini C, Kurelac I, Chang Q, Amato LB, Strillacci A, et al. Packaging and transfer of mitochondrial DNA via exosomes regulate escape from dormancy in hormonal therapy-resistant breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U. S. A. (2017). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704862114
57. Mantile F, Kisovec M, Adamo G, Romancino DP, Hočevar M, Božič D, et al. A novel localization in human large extracellular vesicles for the EGF-CFC founder member CRIPTO and its biological and therapeutic implications. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153700
58. Li D, Tian Y, Hu Y, Qi Y, Tian N, Li S, et al. Glioma-associated human endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles specifically promote the tumourigenicity of glioma stem cells via CD9. Oncogene. (2019) 38:6898–912. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0903-6
59. Walker ND, Elias M, Guiro K, Bhatia R, Greco SJ, Bryan M, et al. Exosomes from differentially activated macrophages influence dormancy or resurgence of breast cancer cells within bone marrow stroma. Cell Death Dis. (2019) 10. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1304-z
60. Whiteside TL. Exosomes and tumor-mediated immune suppression. J Clin Invest. (2016) 126:1216–23. doi: 10.1172/JCI81136
61. Olejarz W, Dominiak A, Zołnierzak A, Kubiak-Tomaszewska G, Lorenc T. Tumor-derived exosomes in immunosuppression and immunotherapy. J Immunol Res. (2020) 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/6272498
62. Jahangiri L, Ishola T. Dormancy in Breast Cancer, the Role of Autophagy, lncRNAs, miRNAs and Exosomes. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095271
63. Vera-Ramirez L, Vodnala SK, Nini R, Hunter KW, Green JE. Autophagy promotes the survival of dormant breast cancer cells and metastatic tumour recurrence. Nat Commun. (2018) 9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04070-6
64. Hoshino A, Kim HS, Bojmar L, Gyan KE, Cioffi M, Hernandez J, et al. Extracellular vesicle and particle biomarkers define multiple human cancers. Cell. (2020) 182:1044–1061.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.009
65. Matsumura T, Sugimachi K, Iinuma H, Takahashi Y, Kurashige J, Sawada G, et al. Exosomal microRNA in serum is a novel biomarker of recurrence in human colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. (2015) 113:275–81. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.201
66. Liao J, Liu R, Shi YJ, Yin LH, Pu YP. Exosome-shuttling microRNA-21 promotes cell migration and invasion-targeting PDCD4 in esophageal cancer. Int J Oncol. (2016) 48:2567–79. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3453
67. Zedan AH, Osther PJS, Assenholt J, Madsen JS, Hansen TF. Circulating miR-141 and miR-375 are associated with treatment outcome in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57101-7
68. Ewton DZ, Hu J, Vilenchik M, Deng X, Luk KC, Polonskaia A, et al. Inactivation of Mirk/Dyrk1b kinase targets quiescent pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. (2011) 10:2104–14. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0498
69. Boichuk S, Parry JA, Makielski KR, Litovchick L, Baron JL, Zewe JP, et al. The DREAM complex mediates GIST cell quiescence and is a novel therapeutic target to enhance imatinib-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res. (2013) 73:5120–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0579
70. Walker S, Busatto S, Pham A, Tian M, Suh A, Carson K, et al. Extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. Theranostics. (2019) 9:8001–17. doi: 10.7150/thno.37097
71. Phan TH, Kim SY, Rudge C, Chrzanowski W. Made by cells for cells - extracellular vesicles as next-generation mainstream medicines. J Cell Sci. (2022) 135. doi: 10.1242/jcs.259166
72. Liguori GL. Challenges and promise for glioblastoma treatment through extracellular vesicle inquiry †. Cells. (2024) 13:336. doi: 10.3390/cells13040336
73. Munagala R, Aqil F, Jeyabalan J, Gupta RC. Bovine milk-derived exosomes for drug delivery. Cancer Lett. (2016) 371:48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.10.020
74. Adamo G, Fierli D, Romancino DP, Picciotto S, Barone ME, Aranyos A, et al. Nanoalgosomes: Introducing extracellular vesicles produced by microalgae. J Extracell. Vesicles. (2021) 10:e12081. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12081
75. Picciotto S, Barone ME, Fierli D, Aranyos A, Adamo G, Božič D, et al. Isolation of extracellular vesicles from microalgae: towards the production of sustainable and natural nanocarriers of bioactive compounds. . Biomater. Sci. (2021). doi: 10.1039/D0BM01696A
76. Woith E, Guerriero G, Hausman JF, Renaut J, Leclercq CC, Weise C, et al. Plant extracellular vesicles and nanovesicles: Focus on secondary metabolites, proteins and lipids with perspectives on their potential and sources. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:1–20. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073719
77. Giancaterino S, Boi C. Alternative biological sources for extracellular vesicles production and purification strategies for process scale-up. Biotechnol Adv. (2023) 63:108092. doi: 10.1016/j.bioteChadv.2022.108092
78. Zhang X, Zhang H, Gu J, Zhang J, Shi H, Qian H, et al. Engineered extracellular vesicles for cancer therapy. Adv Mater. (2021) 33:1–25. doi: 10.1002/adma.202005709
79. Cheng L, Hill AF. Therapeutically harnessing extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. (2022) 21:379–99. doi: 10.1038/s41573-022-00410-w
80. Nicolazzo C, Francescangeli F, Magri V, Giuliani A, Zeuner A, Gazzaniga P. Is cancer an intelligent species? Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2023) 42:1201–18. doi: 10.1007/s10555-023-10123-0
81. Lötvall J, Hill AF, Hochberg F, Buzás EI, Vizio D, Gardiner C, et al. Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: A position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. J Extracell. Vesicles. (2014) 3. doi: 10.3402/jev.v3.26913
82. Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell. Vesicles. (2018). doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750
83. Liguori GL, Kisslinger A. Standardization and reproducibility in EV research: the support of a Quality Management System. In: Biological membrane vesicles: scientific, biotechnological and clinical considerations. Advances in biomembranes and lipid self-assembly. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsiever (2021). doi: 10.1016/bs.abl.2020.05.005
84. Liguori GL, Kisslinger A. Quality management tools on the stage: old but new allies for rigor and standardization of extracellular vesicle studies. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. (2022) 10:826252. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.826252
85. Welsh JA, Goberdhan DCI, O’Driscol L, Buzas EI, Blenkiron C, Bussolati B, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): from basic to advanced approaches. J Extracell. Vesicles. (2023) 12. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12404
86. Zarovni N, Loria F, Zenatelli R, Mladenovic D, Paolini L, Adamo G, et al. Standardization and commercialization of extracellular vesicles. In: Extracellular vesicles: applications to regenerative medicine, therapeutics and diagnostics. The Royal Society for Chemistry. (2021). p. 303–35.
87. Huleihel L, Hussey GS, Naranjo JD, Zhang L, Dziki JL, Turner NJ, et al. Matrix-bound nanovesicles within ECM bioscaffolds. Sci Adv. (2016) 2. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600502
88. Zhang C, Yang X, Jiang T, Yan C, Xu X, Chen Z. Tissue-derived extracellular vesicles: Isolation, purification, and multiple roles in normal and tumor tissues. Life Sci. (2023) 321:121624. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121624
89. Meldolesi J. Exosomes and Ectosomes in Intercellular Communication. Curr Biol. (2018) 28:R435–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.059
90. Mathieu M, Martin-Jaular L, Lavieu G, Théry C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat Cell Biol. (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9
Keywords: extracellular vesicles, cancer cell dormancy, cancer cell awakening, tumor microenvironment, premetastatic niche, metastasis, cancer diagnosis and therapy, EV dormancy signature
Citation: D’Antonio C and Liguori GL (2024) Dormancy and awakening of cancer cells: the extracellular vesicle-mediated cross-talk between Dr. Jekill and Mr. Hyde. Front. Immunol. 15:1441914. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1441914
Received: 31 May 2024; Accepted: 08 August 2024;
Published: 05 September 2024.
Edited by:
Hidetoshi Mori, University of California, Davis, United StatesReviewed by:
Susana García-Silva, Spanish National Cancer Research Center, SpainIrina R. Matei, Cornell University, United States
Copyright © 2024 D’Antonio and Liguori. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Giovanna L. Liguori, Z2lvdmFubmEubGlndW9yaUBpZ2IuY25yLml0