Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 11 September 2024
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders
This article is part of the Research Topic Recent Advances in Causes, Diagnosis, and Therapeutics for Congenital Heart Defects View all 14 articles

Autoantibody profiling of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a pilot study

Siqi LiSiqi Li1DongZhu Xu,DongZhu Xu1,2Nobuyuki MurakoshiNobuyuki Murakoshi1Zixun YuanZixun Yuan3Takuro ImaokaTakuro Imaoka4Kazuko Tajiri,*Kazuko Tajiri2,4*
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 2Tsukuba Life Science Innovation Program (T-LSI), School of Integrative and Global Majors (SIGMA), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 3Stanley and Judith Frankel Institute for Heart & Brain Health, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • 4Department of Cardiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated myocarditis is a rare, but potentially fatal, immune-related adverse event. Hence, identifying biomarkers is critical for selecting and managing patients receiving ICI treatment. Serum autoantibodies (AAbs) in patients with ICI myocarditis may serve as potential biomarkers for predicting, diagnosing, and prognosing ICI myocarditis. We conducted a pilot study using a human proteome microarray with approximately 17,000 unique full-length human proteins to investigate AAbs associated with ICI myocarditis.

Methods and results: AAb profiling was performed using sera collected from three patients with ICI myocarditis before the start of ICI treatment and immediately after myocarditis onset. All patients received anti-programmed death-1 antibody monotherapy. At baseline, 116, 296, and 154 autoantigens reacted positively to immunoglobulin G (IgG) in the serum samples from Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Among these proteins, the recombination signal-binding protein for the immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBPJ) was recognized by all three samples, and 32 autoantigens were recognized by any two of the three samples. At the onset of ICI myocarditis, compared to baseline, 48, 114, and 5 autoantigens reacted more strongly with IgG in the serum samples from Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Among these, antibodies against eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 3 (EIF4EBP3) were the most upregulated, with a 38-fold increase. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses highlighted that B-cell receptor signaling, leukocyte transendothelial migration, and thymus development were among the most affected pathways. Enrichment analyses using DisGeNET revealed that proteins reacting to AAbs detected in patients with ICI myocarditis are associated with several diseases, including dilated cardiomyopathy and muscle weakness.

Conclusions: This pilot study provides the first integrated analysis of serum AAb profiling in patients with ICI myocarditis and identifies novel candidate markers associated with an increased risk of developing ICI myocarditis and its pathogenesis. However, our results require further independent validation in clinical trials involving a larger number of patients.

1 Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a novel class of immunotherapeutic drugs that improve the treatment of a broad range of cancers. These drugs are increasingly being used for a large number of solid and hematological malignancies in the early stages, and several clinical trials are underway to expand their indications (1). However, the benefits of ICIs are often mitigated by the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (24). In particular, myocarditis is recognized as a life-threatening complication with a mortality rate of up to 50% (57), but little is known about its immunological mechanisms and potential biomarkers.

In patients with classical myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy, autoantibodies (AAbs) against a wide range of self-antigens are detected. These AAbs can be specific or nonspecific to heart tissue, and several have been reported to be directly related to the pathophysiology (reviewed in (8, 9)). Immunoadsorption therapy has been performed to remove circulating AAbs in patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, resulting in an improvement in cardiac function and decreased myocardial inflammation in some small studies with a limited number of patients (1012). However, reports on AAbs in patients with ICI myocarditis are limited. A recent study reported that the presence of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies was more prevalent in patients with ICI myocarditis than in ICI-treated control patients. Among patients with ICI myocarditis, anti-AChR antibodies were associated with a higher incidence of cardiomyotoxic events (a composite of life-threatening arrhythmias, severe heart failure, severe respiratory muscle failure, or cardiomyotoxic death) (13). In addition to these findings, no comprehensive investigation on the presence of AAbs in patients with ICI myocarditis has been performed to date.

If AAbs associated with the development of ICI myocarditis are identified, screening could be useful for the diagnosis and prediction of ICI myocarditis. Moreover, treating ICI myocarditis with immunoabsorption or plasma exchange could be a valuable addition to the current standard corticosteroid therapy (14). Furthermore, AAb profiling may help further elucidate the pathogenesis of ICI myocarditis. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to characterize AAb profiles in cancer patients with ICI myocarditis.

2 Material and methods

2.1 Clinical data and sample collection

This study included six serum samples from three patients with ICI myocarditis. Patients were enrolled in a prospective biospecimen collection protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tsukuba Hospital (H30-221). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Clinical, radiographic, and laboratory data were collected from electronic medical records. Blood samples were collected before ICI treatment and at the onset of ICI myocarditis (before steroid therapy). The collected serum samples were aliquoted into smaller volumes and stored at −80°C until further use.

2.2 Serum autoantibody profiling

Comprehensive profiling of serum AAbs was conducted using HuProt™ Human Proteome Microarray v3.1 (CDI Laboratories, Inc, Baltimore, MD, USA), which contained about 17,000 unique proteins. One array per sample was used for the serum profiling. All serum samples were probed on the arrays at a 1:1000 dilution, as optimized by CDI labs, and incubated overnight at 4°C to enhance potential interactions. After probing, the arrays were washed according to the manufacturer’s protocol and probed with anti-human immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies optimized by the CDI laboratories for signal detection.

Non-specific hits that directly bound to the secondary antibody were eliminated from the analysis. The CDI software was used to quantify the specificity of each sample for specific proteins on the array based on Z-scores. The Z-score is the average Z-score of the duplicate spots of a given protein (each protein is printed in duplicate on a HuProt™ array). Z score was calculated as: Z = [Fprotein – Faverage]/FSD where Fprotein is the fluorescence signal intensity of a specific protein, Faverage is the mean fluorescence signal intensity of all protein spots on the array, and FSD denotes the standard deviation of all protein spots on the array. Positive hits were defined as Z-scores > 3.0. AAbs that increased after the onset of ICI myocarditis were identified by following criteria: (1) statistical differences between baseline and after developing ICI myocarditis (P < 0.05), assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test; and (2) fold change (FC) ≥ 2.0.

Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional, and DisGeNET disease enrichment analyses, based on Metascape software (https://metascape.org/, version: v3.520240101) were used to explore their biological significance and characterize diseases associated with AAbs, as performed previously (15, 16). We combined the increased autoantibodies from the three patients, according to the above description (P < 0.05 and fold change (FC) ≥ 2.0) in one list. Then, the list was mapped to the coding genes. Finally, the list of coding genes of the increased autoantibodies was performed GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis via Metascape, respectively. GO or KEGG pathway terms with a P-value < 0.01, a minimum count of three, and an enrichment factor > 1.5 (the enrichment factor is the ratio between the observed counts and the counts expected by chance) were collected and grouped into clusters based on their membership similarities. Top 20 identified GO enrichment terms and KEGG pathway were presented.

3 Results

Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the patients with ICI myocarditis included in this study. All patients received anti-programmed death-1 antibody monotherapy and developed myocarditis after 1-2 cycles of treatment. All patients were diagnosed with definite myocarditis based on definitions suggested by Bonaca et al. (17) and had tissue pathology suggestive of myocarditis on the endocardial biopsy. Two of the three patients had other concomitant myotoxicities (myositis with or without myasthenia gravis-like syndrome). All patients were treated with high-dose steroids, and one patient received additional intravenous immunoglobulin. Two patients were discharged alive, and one died of severe heart failure.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Patient information.

To identify AAb signatures in ICI myocarditis, we performed AAb screening using a human proteome microarray containing approximately 17,000 unique full-length human proteins. We used sera collected before the initiation of ICI treatment (baseline) and immediately after the development of ICI myocarditis (before steroid treatment). At baseline, 116, 296, and 154 autoantigens reacted positively to IgG in the serum samples from Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). Among these proteins, one autoantigen (recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region [RBPJ]) was recognized by all three samples, and 32 autoantigens were recognized by at least two of the three samples (Figure 1A). At the onset of ICI myocarditis, 122, 250, and 143 autoantigens reacted positively to IgG in the serum samples from Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). Among these proteins, RBPJ was recognized by all three samples. Additionally, 29 autoantigens were recognized by any two of the three samples (Figure 1B).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Venn diagram of the number of the immune-reactive autoantigens identified by human proteome microarray. (A) Before ICI treatment and (B) at the onset of ICI myocarditis (B). ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Next, we identified the specific and differentially expressed antibodies at the onset of ICI myocarditis. Antibodies with a change in antigen-antibody reactivity signal intensity of more than 2.0-fold or less than 0.5-fold (P < 0.05) between baseline and the onset of myocarditis were considered AAbs with different expression levels. The differentially recognized autoantigens are visualized in volcano plots (Figure 2A) and described in Supplementary Table 2. At the onset of ICI myocarditis, compared to baseline, 48, 114, and 5 autoantigens reacted more strongly with IgG in serum samples from Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and 36, 89, and 16 autoantigens reacted less strongly, respectively. Among these, antibodies against EIF4EBP3 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E [eIF4E] binding protein 3) were the most upregulated, showing a 38-fold increase (Figure 2A).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Differentially expressed autoantibodies in ICI myocarditis. (A) The volcano plots show the up- (red) or down-regulated (green) proteins at the onset of ICI myocarditis compared to baseline. (B, C) The top 20 GO enrichment terms and KEGG pathway categories involving upregulated (B) and downregulated IgG (C) antibodies. Negative log10-transformed P-value of significantly enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways (P < 0.01) are shown.

To better understand the biological relevance of the identified Abs, GO enrichment analysis was performed on their corresponding proteins. The results revealed that Abs increased during the development of ICI myocarditis and were profoundly involved in the regulation of amide metabolic processes and B-cell receptor signaling pathways (Figure 2B). In the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, leukocyte transendothelial migration pathway was remarkably enriched (Figure 2B). In the AAbs that decreased during the development of ICI myocarditis, the most significantly enriched GO term was related to thymus development function (Figure 2C), and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that the decreased AAbs were mainly involved in the signaling pathways regulating the pluripotency of stem cells and antigen processing and presentation (Figure 2C).

Finally, we performed a DisGeNET disease enrichment analysis to explore the diseases in which these AAbs were involved (Figure 3). Enrichment diseases include T lymphocyte deficiency, muscle weakness, and dilated or familial idiopathic cardiomyopathy.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. DisGeNET disease enrichment analysis. The top 20 diseases enriched in DisGeNETs were associated with upregulated and downregulated IgG antibodies. Negative log10-transformed P-value for significantly enriched diseases (P < 0.01) are shown.

4 Discussion

This pilot study represents the first integrated analysis of serum AAb profiles in patients with ICI myocarditis, shedding light on potential novel candidate markers associated with the heightened risk of developing this and its pathogenesis.

Although RBPJ wasn’t involved in the pathways identified through GO or KEGG analysis, AAbs against RBPJ were detected in the sera of all patients with ICI myocarditis. RBPJ is a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in the Notch signaling pathway (18). The Notch signaling pathway mediated by RBPJ is involved in various cellular processes, including cell fate determination, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis, and plays critical roles in embryonic development, tissue homeostasis, and disease processes, such as cancer and heart diseases (19). There are few reports on AAbs targeting RBPJ, and their clinical significance remains unclear. Nickenig et al. reported an interesting finding that only 31% of healthy patients and 70.6% of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) carry AAbs against RBPJ (20). They speculated that, because RBPJ is involved in cellular immortalization and exerts anti-apoptotic effects, increased anti-RBPJ AAbs may inhibit this growth-regulating feature of RBPJ in patients with DCM. Further research is needed to determine whether anti-RBPJ AAbs can be used as biomarkers for ICI myocarditis and whether they are involved in the pathogenesis of ICI myocarditis.

The AAbs that increased most remarkably during the development of ICI myocarditis were anti-EIF4EBP3 AAbs in Case 1. EIF4EBP3 is an eIF4E-binding protein that inhibits translation initiation by competing with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G for a common binding site on eIF4E (2123). In our study, EIF4EBP3 was involved in the “regulation of amide metabolic process” term in the GO analysis results of coding genes for target proteins recognized by increased AAbs. Little is known about the role of EIF4EBP3 under normal and abnormal conditions, and its role of EIF4EBP3 in the heart is completely unknown.

Recent studies have shown that the presence of anti-AChR AAbs is more prevalent in patients with ICI myocarditis than in ICI-treated controls (11-36% vs 4%) (13, 24). Among the patients with ICI myocarditis, those with anti-AChR antibodies have a poorer prognosis than those without (13). However, we did not detect any anti-AChR antibodies in our study.

Enrichment analyses using GO and KEGG highlighted that B-cell receptor signaling, leukocyte transendothelial migration, and thymus development were among the most affected pathways. Enrichment analyses using DisGeNET revealed that proteins reacting with AAbs detected in patients with ICI myocarditis were associated with several diseases, including DCM and muscle weakness. This pilot study suggests that profiling serum AAbs could enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of ICI myocarditis and facilitate the development of effective therapies, a more comprehensive search for AAbs in more cases is needed in the future.

Although our study offers new insights into the properties and changes in the AAb repertoire associated with ICI myocarditis, it has some limitations. The small sample size included in this study limits the generalizability of the present findings. In addition, we did not perform AAb profiling in ICI-treated controls (i.e., without myocarditis). Consequently, it is crucial to validate the identified Abs in larger, more diverse, and independent cohorts with appropriate controls to elucidate their roles in ICI myocarditis.

5 Conclusion

Human proteomic microarrays offer a powerful platform for the discovery of novel antibodies in patients with ICI myocarditis. This pilot study provides the first integrated analysis of serum AAb profiling in patients with ICI myocarditis and identifies novel candidate markers associated with an increased risk of developing ICI myocarditis and its pathogenesis. However, our results require further independent validation in clinical trials involving a larger number of patients. Further identification and characterization of AAbs are likely to hold significant implications for diagnostic and biomarker discovery, immune profiling, and the development of effective treatments.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the University of Tsukuba Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

SL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. DX: Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. NM: Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. ZY: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. TI: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. KT: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (20K08396, 22KJ0425, and 23K07518), National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (2023-A-12), and the Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yumi Isaka for the technical assistance. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for the English language editing.

Conflict of interest

KT received honoraria lecture fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai, and AstraZeneca.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1423622/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Zaha VG, Meijers WC, Moslehi J. Cardio-immuno-oncology. Circulation. (2020) 141:87–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042276

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Chen TW, Razak AR, Bedard PL, Siu LL, Hansen AR. A systematic review of immune-related adverse event reporting in clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Ann Oncol. (2015) 26:1824–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv182

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Boutros C, Tarhini A, Routier E, Lambotte O, Ladurie FL, Carbonnel F, et al. Safety profiles of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies alone and in combination. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2016) 13:473–86. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.58

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Champiat S, Lambotte O, Barreau E, Belkhir R, Berdelou A, Carbonnel F, et al. Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper. Ann Oncol. (2016) 27:559–74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv623

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Nakagomi Y, Tajiri K, Shimada S, Li S, Inoue K, Murakata Y, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myositis overlapping with myocarditis: an institutional case series and a systematic review of literature. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:884776. doi: 10.3389/FPHAR.2022.884776

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Tajiri K, Ieda M. Cardiac complications in immune checkpoint inhibition therapy. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2019) 6:3. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Tajiri K, Aonuma K, Sekine I. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. (2018) 48:7–12. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx154

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mone K, Reddy J. The knowns and unknowns of cardiac autoimmunity in viral myocarditis. Rev Med Virol. (2023) 33:e2478. doi: 10.1002/RMV.2478

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Asatryan B, Asimaki A, Landstrom AP, Khanji MY, Odening KE, Cooper LT, et al. Inflammation and immune response in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: state-of-the-art review. Circulation. (2021) 144:1646–55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055890

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Staudt A, Schäper F, Stangl V, Plagemann A, Böhm M, Merkel K, et al. Immunohistological changes in dilated cardiomyopathy induced by immunoadsorption therapy and subsequent immunoglobulin substitution. Circulation. (2001) 103:2681–6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.22.2681

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Müller J, Wallukat G, Dandel M, Bieda H, Brandes K, Spiegelsberger S, et al. Immunoglobulin adsorption in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. (2000) 101:385–91. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.4.385

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Felix SB, Staudt A, Dörffel WV, Stangl V, Merkel K, Pohl M, et al. Hemodynamic effects of immunoadsorption and subsequent immunoglobulin substitution in dilated cardiomyopathy: three-month results from a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2000) 35:1590–8. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00568-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fenioux C, Abbar B, Boussouar S, Bretagne M, Power JR, Moslehi JJ, et al. Thymus alterations and susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis. Nat Med. (2023) 29:3100–10. doi: 10.1038/S41591-023-02591-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Lyon AR, López-Fernández T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, et al. ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA). Eur Heart J: Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. (2022) 43:4229–361. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac244

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Mesleh A, Ehtewish H, Lennard K, Abdesselem HB, Al-Shaban F, Decock J, et al. High-throughput autoantibody screening identifies differentially abundant autoantibodies in autism spectrum disorder. Front Mol Neurosci. (2023) 16:1222506. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1222506

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Beutgen VM, Schmelter C, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Autoantigens in the trabecular meshwork and glaucoma-specific alterations in the natural autoantibody repertoire. Clin Transl Immunol. (2020) 9:1–20. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1101

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bonaca MP, Olenchock BA, Salem JE, Wiviott SD, Ederhy S, Cohen A, et al. Myocarditis in the setting of cancer therapeutics: proposed case definitions for emerging clinical syndromes in cardio-oncology. Circulation. (2019) 140:80–91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034497

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Borggrefe T, Oswald F. The Notch signaling pathway: transcriptional regulation at Notch target genes. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2009) 66:1631–46. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8668-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Siebel C, Lendahl U. Notch signaling in development, tissue homeostasis, and disease. Physiol Rev. (2017) 97:1235–94. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00005.2017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Nickenig G, Wolff M, Stäblein A, Pfister H, Böhm M. Enhanced expression and autoimmunity of recombination signal binding protein-jkappa in human dilated cardiomyopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1999) 266:432–6. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1855

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Siddiqui N, Sonenberg N. Signalling to eIF4E in cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. (2015) 43:763–72. doi: 10.1042/BST20150126

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. William M, Leroux LP, Chaparro V, Lorent J, Graber TE, M'Boutchou MN, et al. eIF4E-binding Proteins 1 and 2 limit macrophage anti-inflammatory responses through translational repression of IL-10 and cyclooxygenase-2. J Immunol. (2018) 200:4102–16. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701670

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Hsieh AC, Ruggero D. Targeting eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. (2010) 16:4914–20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0433

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Coustal C, Vanoverschelde J, Quantin X, Lesage C, Michot JM, Lappara A, et al. Prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced myocarditis: a case series. J Immunother Cancer. (2023) 11:e004792. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-004792

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cardio-oncology, onco-cardiology, immune-related adverse event, irAE, proteome, proteomics, autoimmunity

Citation: Li S, Xu D, Murakoshi N, Yuan Z, Imaoka T and Tajiri K (2024) Autoantibody profiling of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a pilot study. Front. Immunol. 15:1423622. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1423622

Received: 01 May 2024; Accepted: 23 August 2024;
Published: 11 September 2024.

Edited by:

Tamer M. Mohamed, University of Louisville, United States

Reviewed by:

Chiara Cardamone, University of Salerno, Italy
Masayoshi Oikawa, Fukushima Medical University, Japan

Copyright © 2024 Li, Xu, Murakoshi, Yuan, Imaoka and Tajiri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kazuko Tajiri, a3RhamlyaUBlYXN0Lm5jYy5nby5qcA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.