Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 13 August 2024
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research Topic Cell Death in Cancer Immunology View all 15 articles

Ferroptosis: mechanism, immunotherapy and role in ovarian cancer

Ke GuoKe Guo1Miao LuMiao Lu1Jianlei BiJianlei Bi2Tianyu YaoTianyu Yao1Jian GaoJian Gao1Fang RenFang Ren1Liancheng Zhu*Liancheng Zhu1*
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China

Ovarian cancer is currently the second most common malignant tumor among gynecological cancers worldwide, primarily due to challenges in early diagnosis, high recurrence rates, and resistance to existing treatments. Current therapeutic options are inadequate for addressing the needs of ovarian cancer patients. Ferroptosis, a novel form of regulated cell death with demonstrated tumor-suppressive properties, has gained increasing attention in ovarian malignancy research. A growing body of evidence suggests that ferroptosis plays a significant role in the onset, progression, and incidence of ovarian cancer. Additionally, it has been found that immunotherapy, an emerging frontier in tumor treatment, synergizes with ferroptosis in the context of ovarian cancer. Consequently, ferroptosis is likely to become a critical target in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

1 Introduction

Ovarian cancer is one of the most prevalent and deadly subtypes of gynecological malignant tumors. There are several types of ovarian cancer, with epithelial ovarian cancer being the most common (1). Ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed using a combination of therapies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and innovative immunotherapy. Between 1976 and 2015, the death rate from ovarian cancer in the United States declined by 33%, while its incidence fell by 29% between 1985 and 2014 (2). However, the five-year survival rate of patients remained less than thirty percent (2), leading to a higher mortality rate among female reproductive system malignancies, as the majority of ovarian cancers were only discovered in stage III (51%) or stage IV (29%) (3). Furthermore, there is a lack of treatment resistance and early diagnostic targets for ovarian cancer. Therefore, novel therapeutics are urgently needed to improve the early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Ferroptosis is a novel process of iron-dependent regulated cell death induced by erastin, characterized by the accumulation of iron ions, increased lipid peroxide concentration, reduced glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) activity, and often accompanied by large amounts of reactive oxygen species (4). Ferroptosis has been shown to be intimately associated with several biological processes and diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and brain hemorrhage. Furthermore, it has been proposed that ferroptosis may play a role in tumor suppression (5). Recent studies have demonstrated that ferroptosis is closely related to the growth regulation of ovarian cancers through mechanisms involving the transsulfuration pathway, Hippo signaling pathways, and p53. Additionally, the combination of immunotherapy and ferroptosis treatment is becoming a research hotspot in ovarian cancer. This review outlines the current understanding and research on ferroptosis in ovarian cancer, as many specific regulatory processes and mechanisms remain unclear. Further elucidation of the ferroptosis process in ovarian cancer is expected to identify more therapeutic targets and drugs, laying the groundwork for novel treatment approaches and improved prognoses.

2 Mechanism of ferroptosis

Ferroptosis is commonly believed to be regulated primarily by three mechanisms: iron overload, lipid peroxidation, and the oxidized form mediated by the xc-cysteine/glutamate antiporter system (6).Notably, ferroptosis is primarily caused by unbalanced cellular metabolic processes, including dysregulated iron and lipid metabolism, and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (7).This unique characteristic of ferroptosis has led to the discovery of new pathways and mechanisms which closely related to ferroptosis regulation in recent years (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The main mechanism of ferroptosis.

2.1 GPX4-GSH pathway

The XC-system is an amino acid transporter that forms the GPX4-GSH pathway with the functional subunit SLC7A11 and the regulatory subunit SLC3A2, playing a crucial role in the cellular antioxidant system. Through the XC-system, cystine and glutamate are exchanged between the inside and outside of the cell. Inside the cell, cystine is converted to cysteine, which is further transformed into glutathione (GSH). GSH acts as a cofactor for glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), helping to restore polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and inhibiting ferroptosis, making it a vital regulator of ferroptosis (8). When GPX4 is suppressed, it promotes the accumulation of lipid ROS, accelerates cell death, induces the occurrence of ferroptosis, and inhibits the growth of tumor cells (9). Studies have found that drugs such as erastin (10), sulfasalazine (11), ssorafenib (12), and p53 (13)can causing the production of GSH by inhibiting the XC system and induce the occurrence of ferroptosis. In ovarian cancer, Luo et al. discovered that PAX8, a gene that suppresses ferroptosis, can be inhibited by PAX8i to induce ferroptosis through the GPX4 pathway in combination with RSL3. This approach increases sensitivity to ferroptosis inducers and inhibits the progression of ovarian cancer (14).

Mammal cells can also obtain cysteine through the transsulfuration pathway in certain cases, in addition to their dependence on the XC system (15). Methionine can be converted to cysteine via the catalytic actions of cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine gamma-lyase (CSE). Verschoor and colleagues discovered that blocking the transsulfuration pathway lowers the level of GSH and GPX activity in an ovarian cancer model cell line (16), which ultimately results in ferroptosis.

2.2 Lipid peroxidation

Ferroptosis is primarily caused by the lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). The acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) and lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3 (LPCAT3) catalyze the production of polyunsaturated fatty acid-phosphatidylethanolamine (PUFA-PE) from PUFA (17). PUFA-PE is the most susceptible to the oxidation of lipids, which under the influence of the Fenton reaction undergo a series of oxidative reactions, thereby promoting the production of PL-OOH (18).This extensive lipid peroxide reaction induces the occurrence of ferroptosis (19). Sebastian Doll (20) and colleagues found that inhibiting ACSL4 can suppress ferroptosis by regulating lipid peroxidation, suggesting that ACSL4 may be a potential target for preventing ferroptosis-related diseases.

2.3 FSP1-CoQ10-NAD (P) H pathway

A recently identified antioxidant system that controls ferroptosis without relying on the GPX4 pathway is ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) (21). By reducing and restoring coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), which inhibits lipid peroxide, FSP1 is drawn to the plasma membrane to prevent ferroptosis. FSP1, possessing NAD(P)H oxidase activity (22), can catalyze the conversion of ubiquinone to ubiquinol, with the resulting ubiquinol scavenging free radicals and thereby preventing ferroptosis. However, Kang et al. discovered that in FSP1-knockout cells, CoQ10 cannot reverse the ferroptosis induced by ferroptosis inducers. On the other hand, the ESCRT-III membrane repair system lets the ferroptosis inductor do its job again, which is to cause ferroptosis in FSP-1 cells. Consequently, it is unlikely that FSP1 might also be involved in ESCRT-III-mediated ferroptosis suppression (23). Additionally, it has been shown that dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) can prevent ferroptosis in the mitochondrial membrane by converting ubiquinone to ubiquinol. In GPX4-deficient cancer cells, DHODH inactivation leads to extensive lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis (24). However, none of the specific mechanisms are clear enough.

2.4 The BH4-GCH1 pathway

GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1) produces tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) from GTP, acting as a speed limit enzyme. GCH1 prevents ferroptosis by acting as an antioxidant through BH4/BH2. High-expressed BH4 cells can prevent oxidative damage by producing CoQ10, which prevents oxidation directly and prevents cellular ferroptosis (25).

2.5 Iron overload

The transferrin receptor (TFRC) recognizes Fe (3+) bound to transferrin (TF) in the serum and facilitates its entry into the cell. Once inside, Fe (3+) is reduced to Fe (2+) and stored in the iron pool. An excess of Fe (2+) activates iron-containing enzymes, which react with H2O2 to generate a significant amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to ferroptosis (26). When the stored ferritin is recognized by NCOA4, it is recruited into the autophage, causing oxidative damage, a process also known as ferritinophagy, which can help induce ferroptosis (5). Simultaneously, the susceptibility to ferroptosis is increased when ferritinophagy takes place, which results in a significant amount of free iron (27).

3 Regulation of ferroptosis in ovarian cancer

3.1 Signal pathway

3.1.1 HIPPO pathway

The hippo pathway is a tumor-suppressing pathway that can detect and control cell density. The two main transcript coactivators of this pathway are Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP) and transcription coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). Transcription enhancement-related domains (TEAD) members can interact with TAP to mediate multi-cancer proliferation, renewal, transfer, and drug resistance (28). The Hippo pathway controls ferroptosis in ovarian cancer through YAP and TAZ. When TAZ is overexpressed, OVCA cells become susceptible to ferroptosis. TAZ also causes ferroptosis by controlling the level of its direct target gene, angiooietin-like 4(ANGPTL4), which in turn controls the activity of NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2) (29). When TAZ is overexpressed, OVCA cells become susceptible to ferroptosis. When SKP2 or YAP are removed, lipid oxidation is inhibited during the ferroptosis inducer (30).Therefore, the Hippo pathway may be a major target in ovarian tumor cell ferroptosis and play a crucial role in controlling the susceptibility of ferroptosis inducers to ovarian tumor ferroptosis.

3.1.2 Nrf2 pathway

To keep cell metabolism, oxidation restoration, protein sedimentation balance, and antioxidation going, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRf2) is a transcription factor that is very important. It has been discovered that numerous significant ferroptosis regulators are NRF2’s target genes (31). For example, research has discovered that NRF2 can govern the ferroptosis of tumor cells through many downstream targets such as GPX4 channels (32, 33), HMOX1 (34), ferritinophagy activating proteins (ATG5 etc.) (31), while NRF 2 has also been reported to be connected with the prognosis of tumors (35).

Several studies have found that NRF2 is a regulatory factor in ovarian tumor ferroptosis. Apatinib can induce ferroptosis by combining olaparib with NRf2, inhibiting GPX4 expression (36). Pachymaran can induce ferroptosis by lowering NRF2 mRNA to raise Fe2+ and lower levels of NRF2,HO-1 and GPX4 proteins in ovarian cancer cells (37). Norcantharidin (NCTD) can also regulate ferroptosis by acting on the NRF2/HO-1/GPX4/xCT axis, leading to ferroptosis of ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting NRF2 (38). Tripterygium glycosides, by targeting the NRF2/GPX4 signal axis, disrupt the stability of the oxidation restoration reaction and induce ferroptosis in ovarian tumor cells, thereby enhancing the chemical susceptibility of ovarian cancer to cisplatin (39). Wang et al. found that eryodictyol reduced NRF2 expression in mouse tumor tissue and regulated ferroptosis in ovarian cancer through NRF2/HO-1/NQO1 signal pathways (40). Furthermore, NRF2 can enhance erastin-induced ferroptosis resistance by upgrading the expression of CBS in anti-erastin cells in the transsulfuration pathway (41). Chelerythrine (CHE), widely recognized as an anticancer agent, was found by Jia et al. to exert inhibitory effects on ovarian cancer cell growth. This inhibition was achieved through its action on Nrf2, which mediated the expression of ferroptosis-related proteins and subsequently promoted ferroptosis (42). NRF2 can also play a role in ferritin synthesis and degradation NRF2 regulates ferritin by HECT and RLD domains containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2(HERC2), NCOA4 and vesicle-associated membrane protein 8(VAMP8). In addition, ovarian cancer cells with high NFE2L2/NRF2 expression have been found to increase sensitivity to the ferroptosis inducer (43).This demonstrates that NRF2 is an important treatment target for ovarian cancer and plays a role in a variety of regulatory pathways. While other ferroptosis regulating factors in ovarian cancer that are regulated by NRF2 are not yet fully studied, future studies of NRf2 in ovary cancer are to be expected.

3.1.3 P53 pathway

P53 is a tumor suppressor protein that plays a powerful role in cell aging, death, and DNA damage repair. In recent years, more and more research has found that P53 plays a crucial role in ferroptosis. The regulatory effect of P53 is two-way and has a different effect as the environment changes. When lipid peroxide is slight, it inhibits the occurrence of ferroptosis, helping the cell to survive. However, when lipid peroxide is persistent and severe, it induces ferroptosis, helping tumor cell death (44). For the GPX4-Xc system, P53 can combine and degrade SLC7A11, enhance the expression of SAT1 and GLS2 in cells (5, 13), and reduce the production of GSH by inhibiting CBS (45) expression, thereby suppressing GPX4.When p53 elevates SAT1 expression, it can indirectly promote ALOX15 elevation, promoting lipid peroxide (46).Studies have also shown that p53 can inhibit the development of ferroptosis by blocking dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP4) activity, limiting the peroxidation of lipids (47). P53 inhibits TFR1 and ZRT/IRT-like Protein 14 (ZIP14),reducing cellular Fe (2+) (48). p53 can also inhibit the occurrence of ferroptosis by reactivating the two-minute binoculars (MDM2) in mice, activating FSP1 (49).

Through p53, PARP inhibitors block SLC7A11 expression in ovarian cancer, which lowers GSH synthesis and increases lipid peroxide and ferroptosis (50). Apatinib combined with olaparib causes ferroptosis in ovarian cancer through p53 dependent way (36). A lack of MEX3A causes the p53 protein to become more stable, which prevents ferroptosis and encourages ovarian cancer (51). To encourage OVCAR-3-cell ferroptosis, ursolic acid (UA) can trigger the JNK/p53 signal pathway (52).

3.2 Gene

3.2.1 SCD1

Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase 1(SCD1) is an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids in ovarian cancer cells and is highly expressed in ovary tumor cells (53). Inhibition or absence of the SCD1 gene can induce cellular ferroptosis. SCD1/FADS2 has a positive ratio to the level of unsaturated fatty acids, which can regulate lipid peroxide. Inhibiting SCD1/FADS2 can also directly degrade GPX4, thereby inducing the development of ferroptosis (54). Menin-mixed-lineage leukemia(Menin-MLL) inhibitor MI-463 can mediate ferroptosis in cancer cells through lipid peroxide regulated by SCD1 (55). Furthermore, in ovarian cancer cells, agrimonolide can target SCD1 as a new ferroptosis inducer (56). The ferroptosis pathway is one of the SCD1 routes that TP53 (13) can regulate, indicating that ovarian cancer with TP53 mutations may respond better to a SCD1 inhibitor. In addition to increasing ovarian sensitivity to ferroptosis, SCD1 medication suppression may be more advantageous for TP53-mutated ovarian malignancies (57). TESFAY found that ferroptosis inhibitor erastin can be used in conjunction with SCD1-inhibitors A939572 to regulate lipid metabolism, significantly enhancing the anti-tumor effect of the induced ferroptosis inducer in the ovarian cells, increasing ovarian cell susceptibility to ferroptosis inducers (53). Treatment with the SCD1-inhibitors MF-438, CAY10566, and 939572 makes ovarian carcinoma cells more susceptible to the death ferroptosis-inducers RSL3 and Erastin (58). Treatment of ovarian tumor cells with SCD1/FADS2 inhibitors in combination with ferroptosislatin can raise the rate of apoptosis, decrease the rate of cell mobility and tumor metastasis, and increase the sensitivity of ovarian tumor cells to ferroptosislatin (54). According to a number of studies, SCD1 inhibitors in ovarian cancer can dramatically increase the effect of ferroptosis and aid in tumor cell regression, in addition to increasing the sensitivity of ferroptosis inducers. This suggests that SCD1 may one day serve as a novel therapeutic.

3.2.2 FZD7

Wnt receptor Frizzled-7 (FZD7) is a transmembrane receptor that functions beyond the signals of both the canonical pathway and the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway. Overexpression of FZD7 can drive the development of ovarian tumors via the Wnt signal pathway (59). FZD7 directly links to the expression of GSS, GSR, GPX2, and IDH genes related to GSH metabolism. In ovarian cancer tissue, FZD7 can activate the carcinogen P63, enhance the expression of GPX4, prevent tumor cell ferroptosis, and decrease the susceptibility of drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells to ferroptosis (60). In addition, miR-1-3p significantly improves the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to Erastin or RSL3-induced ferroptosis by decreasing FZD7 expression (61). This shows that treating ovarian cancer cells resistant to platinum may benefit from targeting FZD7. Simultaneously, an innovative prospect of combining a ferroptosis inducer with a FZD7 inhibitor emerged.

3.2.3 SNAI2

Research has demonstrated strong expression of SNAI2 in ovarian cancer cells, directly linking this expression to the cells’ ability to survive, proliferate, invade, and spread. The promoter area of SLC7A11 is bound by SNAI2, and when SNAI2 is blocked, SLC7A11 expression is down-regulated, which causes ferroptosis in ovarian carcinoma cells (62). A leucine zipper transcription factor called CCAAT/enhancer binding protein gamma(CEBPG) has also been found to enhance transcription in SLC7A11 and promote GPX4 expression, thereby inhibiting ferroptosis in the OC. and leading to tumor cell development. Additionally, at the clinical level, CEBPG expression has been observed to be associated with an adverse prognosis in patients with OC (63). The E3 ubiquitin ligase 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl reductase degradation (HRD1) inhibits the growth of tumors in a variety of cancer forms. HRD1 has the capacity to control ubiquitination and OC cell stability. Through increasing SLC7A11 degradation, HRD1 interacts with SLC7A11 in OC cells to encourage ferroptosis and prevent the growth of OC tumors (64).

3.2.4 PARP

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP) are involved in cellular processes such as DNA repair, transcription, metabolic regulation and cell death (65). PARP inhibitors are currently an effective treatment for BRCA mutant ovarian cancer (66). PARPi reduces the expression of SLC7A11 in a p53 dependent way, thereby reducing the biosynthesis of GSH and promoting lipid peroxide and ferroptosis. It was also found that PARPi was associated with the expression of CBS, FSP-1,etc. (50).Olaparib is a classic PARP inhibitor for treating BRCA mutant ovarian cancer. The combined treatment of olaparib and arsenic trioxide (ATO) activates the AMPKα pathway and inhibits SCD1 expression, resulting in a significant increase in lipid peroxide in ovarian cancer cells, which induces the occurrence of ferroptosis (67).However, BRCA (wild type) ovarian cancer can produce olaparib resistance by repairing PARPi-induced DNA damage. On this basis, PARPi combined with FINS targeting SLC7A11 or GPX4 can synergistically enhance ferroptosis, thereby producing an effective tumor suppression effect against BRCA (wild type) ovarian cancer (50).Similarly, Apatinib combined with olaparib reduced GPX4 by inhibiting expression of NRF2 and autophagy, inducing ferroptosis in ovarian cancer. However, in P53 (wild type) ovarian cancer cells, the p53 activator RITA can increase the sensitivity of resistant cells to ferroptosis, enhancing the effect of ferroptosis (36).PARP inhibitors, in addition to their therapeutic effects on BRCA mutant ovarian cancer cells, have also been combined with ferroptosis inducers or critical factors to enhance the sensitivity of mutant ovary cancer to ferroptosis.

3.2.5 ARDHEP 15

In the clinical treatment of malignancies, microtubule-targeted agents (MTA) are useful chemotherapeutic agents, and the interaction of microtubulin with VDAC provides a novel target for inducing ferroptosis in cancer cells (68). Tubulin polymerization can be inhibited by the newly synthesized novel aroyl diheterocyclic pyrrole (ARDHEP) 15. ARDHEP may induce ferroptosis in ovarian tumor cells and prevent tumor cell growth by upregulating GPX4, increasing intracellular ROS and Fe(2+) buildup, and stimulating cellular oxidative damage (69). It is a novel therapeutic target for tumors.

ALDH3A2 is a member of the ALDH family. Studies have shown that removing ALDH3A2 boosts lipid metabolism and, when combined with GPX4, helps prevent ferroptosis. Additionally, the expression of ALDH3A2 is directly correlated with the ferroptosis susceptibility of ovarian cancer cells, which can prevent ferroptosis in ovarian cancerous cells (69).

3.2.6 RNA

Microscopic RNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous expressions of non-coding RNA that are highly significant in biological processes such as differentiation, proliferation, mortality, etc. Recent research has also discovered that miRNAs regulate ferroptosis, connecting them to numerous diseases, including cancer (70). By directly combining the 3’ Untranslated Regions (UTR) with ACSL4, mir-424-5p inhibits the expression of ACSL4, thereby reducing the ferroptosis induced by erastin and RSL3, thereby lowering the sensitivity of ovarian cancer tissue to ferroptosis, ultimately leading to the malignant progression of OC (71). Researchers found that Extrinsic Fe and DFO target miR-485-3P and miR-194 to regulate the expression of FPN. Large-scale induction of miR-485-3P expression can reduce intraocular FPN, which raises Fe2+ in ovarian cancer cells and causes the cells to undergo ferroptosis (72). By boosting miR-382-5p to lower SLC7A11 and so preventing the proliferation, invasion, and transfer of ovarian cancer cells, lidocaine also causes a buildup of iron content and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the OC. cells (73). lncRNA is a non-coding RNA with a length longer than 200 nucleocarbons and plays a significant role in epigenetic regulation, cell cycle regulation, and cell differentiation regulation (67).lncRNA ADAMTS9-AS1 can block the process of ferroptosis in OC cells via modulating the mir-587/SLC7A11 axis, which can further the malignant growth of OC cells (73). JIN et al. found that LncRNA CACNA1G-AS1 can stimulate the growth and transfer of ovarian cancer cells through the FTH1-IGF2BP1 axis to regulate the expression of FTH1 and inhibit ferritinophagy (74). According to recent research, circRNA regulates ferroptosis, anemia, metabolism, tumor growth, and anemia (75). CircRNASnx12 improves immunomodulatory resistance in ovarian cancer by targeting miR-194-5p/SLC7A11 pathways to block ferroptosis. CircRNASnx12 can therefore serve as an effective therapeutic target for overcoming cisplatin resistance (76) (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Genes involved in ferroptosis of ovarian cancer cell.

3.3 Drug therapy

Researchers are still studying the development of ferroptosis-related drugs for ovarian cancer despite the increasing clarity on many mechanisms of ferroptosis. The thioredoxin reductase auranofin, is used in conjunction with the MENIN-MLL inhibitor MI-463 to induce ferroptosis in ovarian tumor cells (55). Artesunate (ART) is a widely used anti-malaria drug that has been studied to find multiple cellular responses involved in tumor cells, such as mortality, malnutrition, ferroptosis, etc. (85). Greenshields and others found that ART treatment induces ovarian cancer cells to produce a large amount of ROS, which exerts a potent anti-proliferative and cell-toxic effect on ovarian cancers. At the same time, neither the use of mortality inhibitors nor ferroptosis related-inhibitors can completely eliminate the effect of ART, indicating that ART has a combined inhibitory effect on ovarian cancer tumor cells in a variety of ways (86).Octreotide, an FDA-approved medication that is commonly used in the clinical treatment of ovarian cancer, can directly decrease the expression of GPX4 inducing ferroptosis (87). A rating system of ferroptosis-related genes constructed using TCGA mRNA expression data found Dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) to be a potentially sensitive drug for ovarian cancer (88). Large doses of selenium induce cell death mediated by ferroptosis through abnormal GPx4 and lipid peroxide mechanisms, thereby producing anti-cancer effects. High doses of selenium have been speculated to lead to GPx4 deficiency through the Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway (89). After the treatment of ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSCs) with anisomycin, the levels of triphosadenine and total glutathione were found to be significantly reduced, Fe2+ levels increased, lipid peroxide increased, and the activity of OCSCs significantly decreased. Furthermore, anisomycin reduces the level of transcription of gene clusters that encode pathways related to the regulation of ferroptosis, such as glutathione metabolism and the autophagy signal transduction pathway. The genes of the core factor ATF4 of these two pathways are significantly expressed in ovarian cancer tissue and are associated with a poor prognosis. Thus, anisomycin may induce ferroptosis in ovarian cancer stem cells by reducing ATF4 to regulate glutathione metabolism (90). Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and its receptor (LIFR) can induce ferroptosis via the GPX4 system. Additionally, LIF and LIFR have been found to act on M1 macrophages, enhancing the activity of CD8+ T cells and thereby regulating the immunogenicity of ovarian cancer cells. However, the specific mechanisms and pathways involved in this process remain unclear (91).

As a new direction in ferroptosis applications, nanomaterials are safer, more durable and more accurate in applications that induce ferroptosis to produce ovarian tumor suppression (92). In addition, nanomaterials have been found to enhance the immunotherapy effect of induced ferroptosis (93). Superparamagnetic iron oxid spio-serum can effectively induce lipid peroxide and produce a large amount of toxic ROS by reducing the expression of the ferroptosis related proteins SLC7A11 and GPX4 in OVCA cells, play synergies with p53 and promote the occurrence of ferroptosis in ovarian cancer cells (77). Biomimetic magnetic nanoparticles Fe3O4-SAS @ PLT are constructed by Fe3O4 and a platelet membrane covering containing sulfasalazine (SAS), which can increase the sensitivity to ferroptosis, inducing ferroptosis by inhibiting the Xc-system. In addition, Fe3O4-SAS @ PLT can also produce mild immunogenicity that triggers the immunotherapy response to ovarian cancer (94). Chemokinetic therapy (CDT) is considered one of the most promising cancer treatments, mainly through the Fenton reaction. As a Fenton reagent, iron nitroprusside, (FeNP) has a therapeutic effect on ovarian cancer organs originating from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) by inhibiting GPX4’s involvement in ferroptosis (95) (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The drug that regulate ferroptosis and sensitivity of ovarian tumor cell to chemotherapy.

Although research on medications linked to ferroptosis is still ongoing, there is still hope for significant future developments in ovarian cancer management.

3.4 Enhancement of chemoresistance

Currently, the main clinical treatments for ovarian cancer are surgery and chemotherapy with paclitaxel combined with platinum drugs. However, the prognosis for ovarian cancer patients who are susceptible to chemotherapy resistance is poor. Nevertheless, research has shown that ferroptosis inducers can improve the chemotherapy sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells (104). The ferroptosis inducer erastin has been shown to activate the apoptosis pathway, which may increase the sensitivity of HEY and SKOV3 cells to cisplatin (105). Furthermore, expression due to ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) in OVCA cells that are resistant to another chemotherapeutic drug, dositase, erastin exhibits a strong reversal effect of ABCB1, increasing the susceptibility of OVCAC cells to docetaxel (94).

The sensitivity of cells to ferroptosis and ferroptosis conditions is strongly correlated, and the iron compound ferlixit joint erastin can overcome the chemotherapeutic resistance of ferroptosis ovarian cancer (99). Studies have also demonstrated that the acquired synthesis of cystine and glutathione impacts carboplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1-beta (HNF1) can promote glutathione synthesis to avoid carboplatin resistance to ovarian clear cell carcinoma (80). Simultaneously, P53 was identified as a key pathway in the bioinformatic analysis of the resistance of HNF1 to ovarian cancer (81). The loss of Fdx1 mediated by siRNA in cisplatin-resistant cells is potentiated by an elevation in mitochondrial membrane potential and cisplatin-induced lipid peroxidation, ultimately leading to ferroptosis. Immunohistochemical analysis of clinical specimens from ovarian cancer patients revealed higher expression levels of Fdx1 in cisplatin-resistant specimens compared to cisplatin-sensitive ones. Fdx1 may be a new and appropriate diagnostic and prognostic marker and therapeutic molecular target for the treatment of COVID-19 (82). SLC7A11 and GPX4 high expression levels linked to platinum resistance in EOC patients. The combined expression of SLC7A11 and GPX4 may be a significant independent prognostic factor and a potential treatment target for EOC patients (106). For example, Tripterygium glycosides target the NRF2/GPX4 signal axis and mess up the stable reaction of oxidation restoration. They also cause ferroptosis in A2780/DDP cells and make ovarian cancer more likely to respond to cisplatin (39).

Statistics for progression-free survival and clinically significant improvement were found in patients with ovary cancer who were treated with sorafenib combined with topotecan maintenance therapy (100). MAP30 protein from Momordica charantia and cisplatin can synergistically induce ferroptosis in ovarian cancer cells by altering metabolism (101). GALNT14, a member of the acetylgalactosaminyltransferases family, which can regulate the stability of EGFR proteins to inhibit the EGFR/mTOR pathway, has significantly higher levels of GALNT14 in cisplatin resistance ovarian cancer tissue compared to cisplatin sensitive ovarian cancer tissue. The combination of cisplatin and the mTOR inhibitor GALNT14 had a cumulative effect by promoting apoptosis and ferroptosis of ovarian cancer cells, which may offer a new target for overcoming cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer (103).By increasing ROS, lipid peroxidation, and iron homeostasis in high-OXPHOS high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the promyelocytic leukemia protein-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1a (PML-PGC-1a) axis can help make ovarian cancer more sensitive to chemotherapy. These features are regulatory mechanisms for ferroptosis. It is therefore suspected that this mechanism may improve resistance in ovarian cancer by modulating ferroptosis (107). Furthermore, it was discovered in Zhang ‘s study that chemotherapeutic drugs can also result in lipid peroxidation through an excess of ROS, which can lead to ferroptosis in normal ovarian cells (108). Figuring out the exact way ferroptosis works and what it targets in chemotherapy could help make ovarian cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy drugs while keeping healthy ovarian tissue as safe as possible.

4 Immunotherapy

The study of immunotherapy in the field of ovarian cancer is a hot topic right now. The three main approaches are tumor antigen vaccines, monoclonal antibodies that target the expression of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and immunostimulatory cytokines. Cancer cells can escape immune therapy by modulating immune checkpoint pathways. The study found that when TYRO3 inhibits ferroptosis by regulating ferroptosis pathways such as NRF2, Xc system, tumor cells express high resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (109).In addition, IFN γ released by CD8(+)T cells has been found to promote ferroptosis by acting on SLC3A2 and SLC7A11 on cancer cells, which also enhances anti-tumor immunotherapy against PD-L1 (110). Studies have shown that ovarian cancer is immunogenic (111), and that immunotherapy can extend the survival period of patients with ovarian cancer while lowering the recurrence rate (111). This means that using ferroptosis inducers along with immune checkpoint inhibitors might work well to treat ovarian tumors.

4.1 DAMPs

When tumor cells die due to external stimuli, the process from the non-immunogenic to the immunogenic immune response of the mediated organism is known as immune cell death (ICD). Tumor cells experiencing ICD can release large amounts of cell content into the extracellular space through sudden and uncontrolled cell death. The damage signal molecule is called the damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMPs). The presence of DAMPs in extracellular space triggers a strong immune response, drawing in more phagocytes and other immune cells to eliminate the threat and encourage tissue repair (112). Some anti-tumor drugs can induce ICD through DAMPs (112), recruit immune-inflammatory cells, release a large amount of inflammatory agents, and cause inflammation responses that cause the destruction of normal surrounding tissue, stimulate the formation of neonatal blood vessels, increase vascular permeability, weaken adaptive immune responses, promote tumor development, cancer transfer and tumor resistance (113). Ferroptosis kills cancer cells by enhancing immune cell activity (114). The DAMPs that primarily contribute to ferroptosis include HMGB1, CRT, ATP, and others. The release of ATP from dead cells is a self-dependent process. The presence of ATP serves as a “find me” signal in extracellular space, which is a chemoattractant of the DC precursor. ATP binds to the P2RX7 receptor on DCs, facilitating inflammasome mediated secretion of interleukin 1β (IL-1β), and the binding signals stimulate the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL8 (115), and increase the recruitment of neutrophils and phagocytic potential.CRT is also a recognized DAMP molecule that plays a key role in the onset of immune cell death. The CRT on the membrane of the dead cell serves as a “eat me” signal to the APCs and triggers immune stimulation. HMGB1 is currently mainly believed to play a role through the promotion of inflammatory mediators, achieving inflammation responses, and initiating immunotherapy in ferroptosis (116) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. DAMPs such as HMGB1, CRT, ATP, and PGE2 are created when ferroptosis occurs in ovarian cancer cells. These molecules primarily operate on DC through various signals; DC can also act on CD8+T cells by releasing cytokines like IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-8, and so on. T cells can control the incidence of ferroptosis by inhibiting the Xc system through JAK/STAT1 and promoting Fe through the release of IFN-γ. Macrophages mainly influence the Xc system by means of TGF-β1. To control ferroptosis, immunosuppressive cells can operate on the GPX4 system in a variety of ways.

4.2 Immune cells

Immunol cells can perform anti-tumor immune functions by releasing cytokines that promote the ferroptosis activity of tumor cells. CTL-released IFNγ activates the Janus kinase (JAK) signal and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) pathways, thereby reducing the expression of SLC3A2 and SLC7A11 to inhibit Xc system expression, increasing the iron content stored in the cell, and thus inducing ferroptosis (117). IFNγ released by CD8(+)T cells inhibits the expression of SLC7A11 synergistically, leading to the activation of ferroptosis, thereby enhancing anti-PD-L1 anti-tumor immunotherapy, enhancing lipid oxidation and ferroptosis in tumors, and improving tumor control (110). Similarly, the transformed growth factor-β (TGF-β1) released by macrophageal cells can inhibit transcription of the Xc system through SMAD signals, thereby promoting ferroptosis (118). The SAPE-OOH on the surface of the deferrous cell, as an eat-me signal, guides swallowing by targeting TLR 2 on the macrophageal cell (119) (Figure 2).

4.3 Immunosuppressive cells

Some immunosuppressive cells can antagonize ferroptosis through high expression of GPX4 or other components (110). In addition, Gpx4 can suppress anti-tumor immunity by promoting Treg cell survival in the tumor (120). In Tregs with TCR/CD28 co-stimulation activation,GPX4 expression was promoted, thereby reducing the occurrence of ferroptosis (121).With the absence of GPX4,M1 cells express high amounts of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and create more NO free radicals (NO-), which can have an impact akin to GPX4. (NO-) down-regulates the expression of ferroptosis (122). Intratumoral prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an immunosuppressive mediator that directly inhibits cytotoxic T cell activity (123). It also decreases the number of DCs infiltrating into the TME by inhibiting the chemokines CCL5 and XCL1 (124). The release of PGE2 is linked to the induction of ferroptosis in tumor cell (8, 125, 126). PGE2 overproduction inhibits the tumor immune response and promotes tumor immune evasion (127).

Immunocytosuppressive tumors, or “cold tumors,” do not have tumor-infiltrating T cells, which do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In cold tumors, T cells lack cystathionase and Xc transporters, while myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) lack ASC neutral amino acid transporters and limiting extracellular cysteine, inhibiting T cell activation (128), and its TME is immersed in various immunosuppressive cells (129, 130). We are aware that MDSC is an immunosuppressive cell in ovarian tumor cells. Several studies have demonstrated that MDSC has an immunosuppressive impact by preventing CD8+T cells from infiltrating TME (131, 132), increasing PGE2 to induce PD-L1 expression in ovarian tumor cells (133). As the research goes deeper, there are greater expectations for the combination of ICIs with ferroptosis inducers. Immunosuppressant M2 can be re-polarized to M1 (98, 134) when ferroptosis is caused by certain circumstances, providing an environment for ICIs. Research has demonstrated that CD36 facilitates the absorption of fatty acids by CD8 T cells in TME that have invaded tumors, inducing lipid peroxide and ferroptosis, resulting in reduced cytotoxic cytokine generation and impaired anti-tumor capacity. Blocking CD36 or inhibiting ferroptosis in CD8 T cells effectively restores its anti-tumor activity. More importantly, it has a greater antitumor effect when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies (135). As an inducer of ferroptosis, erastin has little effect on autoimmune activity. However, when combined with oncolytic vaccinia virus (OVV), erastin promotes therapeutic effectiveness and anti-tumor immunity by increasing the number of activated DCs and promoting the activity of tumor-specific CD8+T cells in the tumor (102). The combination also led to increased expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 in the TME. It provides a molecular basis for future ICIS combination therapy. Therefore, the combination of ferroptosis inducers with ICIs enhances tumor immunotherapy.

However, the combination of ferroptosis inducers with ICIs is also likely to increase immunosuppression, which is mainly the role played by MDSC. Ferroptosis of PMN MDSCs in TME gives them stronger immunosuppressive capabilities that are sufficient to convert non-inhibiting PMNs into immune-inhibitory PMN-MDSCs. Even though ferroptosis lowers the number of PMN MDSCs in the TME, it also increases the release of molecules that weaken the immune system, which stops T cells from working. In addition, PMN MDSCs in TME are known to produce PGE2, which undermines the anti-tumor function of innate and adaptive immune cells, inhibits ferroptosis, protects PMN MDSC, and blocks the release of immunosuppressive factors, thereby facilitating the conversion of PMN MDSC to classical non-inhibitory PMN. In some models, the immunosuppressive effects of ferroptosis in PMN-MDSC can exceed its tumor-suppressive effect on cancer cell death. PMN-MDSCs can also rely on peroxide enzymes for lipid peroxidation and transfer lipid to DC cells, blocking the cross-presentation of DC, thus exerting pro-tumor activity (136). The study found that GPx4 deficiency did not inhibit the development of tumors, instead, the GPx4-related ferroptosis caused the cytotoxic CD8+T cell CXCL10 dependent immersion, which was offset by the PD-L1 upgradation of the tumor cell and the significant HMGB1-mediated MDSC infiltration, resulting in a tumor-inhibiting immune response. Therefore, the combination of ferroptosis inducers with ICIs has not yet been clearly concluded. However, there are also ferroptosis inducers that can inhibit MDSC. Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) has a marked anti-tumor and inducing ferroptosis function in tumors, which can be achieved using the PDAC orthotopic tumor model, which significantly inhibits MDSC (137). TLR2 and Runx1 can also regulate MDSC through the ferroptosis path (124). The combination of induced ferroptosis with PD-L1 and MDSC blockage induced ferroptosis doesn’t rely on the presence of particular mutations in tumor cells, meaning that any type of tumor may be treated with this combination therapy. The TME reaction to ferroptosis will determine how well the therapy works (138). Zhu et al. found that Asah2 is highly expressed in tumor-infiltrating MDSCs, which can regulate the ferroptosis of MDSCs through the P53-HMOX1 pathway. The use of the Asah2 inhibitor NC06 to target ASAH2 to induce MDSC ferroptosis is a potentially effective therapy for inhibiting the MDSC accumulation in cancer immunotherapy (139). In addition, Zhang and others constructed a biomimetic magnetosome composed of Fe3O4 magnetic nanocluster (NC) as a core, loaded with TGF-β inhibitors and PD-1 antibodies (Pa).When entering the tumor, Pa and Ti synergistically form an immunogenic micro-environment that increases the amount of H2O2 in the polarized M1 macrophage cells, thereby promoting the Fenton reaction released with NCs. Meanwhile, the produced (OH) induces the ferroptosis of ovarian tumor cells, and the micro-environmental immunogenicity is increased by the exposed tumor antigen. The synergistic effect of ferroptosis and immune therapy in ovarian cancer was generated (140). This gives us the clue that it may be possible to use the ferroptosis inducer in conjunction with ICIs for immunotherapy of tumors in cases where MDSC is suppressed.

It also gives us new ideas for ovarian cancer immunotherapy. The study discovered that ferroptosis was closely associated with ovarian tumor immunity (141). However, in contrast to other tumors, current studies on ferroptosis in immunotherapy are more likely to induce ferroptosis release of DAMP, causing tumor development and a poor prognosis. For instance, C-MYC inhibits ferroptosis induced HMGB1 release mediated by NCOA4 in ovarian cancer cells (83). Low-concentration erastin by STAT3 mediated M2 polarization of macrophage cells increased ferroptosis resistance to ovarian cancer. The macrophage cells processed by erastin also secrete the key cytokines IL-8, which encourage the invasion and migration of anti-ferroptosis O.C. cells (96). However, studies have also found that immune cells can have an anti-tumor effect by inducing the ferroptosis of ovarian cells. ICIs can induce CD8+ T cells to trigger ferroptosis in mouse ovarian tumor cells (142). Immunotherapy-activated CD8+T cells can release IFN-γ and enhance the anti-tumor effect of immunotherapy by inducing ovarian cancer cell ferroptosis. IFN-γ kills mouse OVCA cells ID8 through inhibiting the Xc system, increasing lipid ROS, and reducing tumor growth (117). The study found that inhibition of ovarian cancer metastasis was achieved through targeted MDSC immersion TME (143). By encouraging the release of C5 by ovarian cancer cells and their interaction with PPIP5K2, LncOVM can aid in the infiltration of MDSCs in TME, which leads to lymphatic metastasis in ovarian cancer cells. By blocking this pathway, the C5aR antibody or inhibitor (CCX168) can prevent the recruitment of MDSCs and reinstate the in vivo suppression of tumor genesis and metastasis (143). Ferroptosis inducers in conjunction with ICDs for ovarian cancer have not been investigated for their precise process and effectiveness, but this combination might represent a potent target for ovarian cancer therapy. Due to its unique way of competing with T cells for cysteine, glutamine metabolism will be targeted by MDSC to lower its activity and down-regulate the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment at the same time. Ferroptosis inducers that affect the Xc-system could be more important in promoting immunity and preventing immunological escape.

DAMPs such as HMGB1, CRT, ATP, and PGE2 are created when ferroptosis occurs in ovarian cancer cells. These molecules primarily operate on DC through various signals; DC can also act on CD8+T cells by releasing cytokines like IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-8, and so on. T cells can control the incidence of ferroptosis by inhibiting the Xc system through JAK/STAT1 and promoting Fe through the release of IFN-γ. Macrophages mainly influence the Xc system by means of TGF-β1. To control ferroptosis, immunosuppressive cells can operate on the GPX4 system in a variety of ways (Figure 2).

4.4 Related gene prediction models

Using bioinformation technology, several researchers have constructed prediction models for ovarian cancer and discovered ferroptosis genes that are associated with both tumor inhibition and ovarian cancer prediction. The ferroptosis driving gene ALOX12, for instance, was found to be overexpressed in ovarian cancer cells and induce lipid production, showing high sensitivity and specificity for serous ovarian cystadenocarcinoma (144). Its increased expression was associated with a poor prognosis in OC patients, according to multiple studies using the mRNA expression data of TCGA, IGCG, GTEx, and clinical OC patients. ALOX12 may be a possible risk factor for OC, as inhibition of ALOX12 decreases the migration and proliferation of ovarian cancer cells (145, 146). Comprehensive evaluation of gene expression, related signaling pathways, and immunomodulatory functions also found that the ferroptosis related gene PRNP also played a tumor suppressor role in OC. It may be a potential new biomarker for OC diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy response (147).

The identification of appropriate and effective immune prediction targets will significantly increase the practicality of immunotherapy for ovarian cancer. The realization and implementation of ovarian cancer immunotherapy must take into consideration the immunosuppressive network of ovarian cancer. Researchers are increasingly developing immunotherapy bio-information technology models that utilize ferroptosis-related genes to predict the effects, side-effects, and prognosis of immunotherapies. Studies have constructed a model containing nine ferroptosis-related genes, showing that ferroptosis is closely linked to tumor immunity through the ssGSEA method, but further experimental validation is needed (141). When paired with clinical variables, the risk model developed by YE et al. based on five ferroptosis-related characteristics linked to tumor immunity can more accurately predict the prognosis of OC patients (146). A model of 15 FRGs (c) divided patients into high- and low-risk groups, showing good survival differences. Additionally, in the low-risk group, characteristic enrichment sets were detected with immunity pathways related to ovarian cancer, which suggests that the model can be used to precisely treat immunotherapy for ovarian cancer and for prognosis (148). Using Cox analysis, three prognostic genes were identified from 63 FRGs. Significant differences were found in activated DCs, plasma cells, M0 infiltration, and important immune checkpoint molecules between the two groups when the CIBERSORT algorithm was applied to the various tumor immune microenvironments between the two groups based on the grouping of prognostic genes. The low-risk group also responded better to immunotherapy and chemotherapy at the same time, which was predictive of prognosis and immune response (149). Similar outcomes were achieved by Wang et al. when they developed a risk score model based on various prognostic signal FRGS. Additionally, it has been proposed that in high-risk patients, the combination of immunity and ferroptosis may result in a worse prognosis (150). A clinical risk stratification tool based on four DEG (differentially expressed genes from immune and ferroptosis) has been developed for serous ovarian cancer. It can exhibit a strong correlation with immune markers and induced pluripotent stem cells (IPS). Encourage additional clinical judgment in the areas of personalized treatment planning, prognostic assessment, and follow-up scheduling (151). A risk model established by finding significantly differentially expressed genes associated with ferroptosis was found to have favorable immune cell and prognostic associations (152). Furthermore, ferroptosis and oxidative stress-related genes (FORGs) have been found to be associated with immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. Based on the expressive characteristics of 19 FORGs, ovarian cancer patients were divided into two FORG subtypes. The high-risk group had immunosuppression and a poor prognosis. The risk scores significantly correlated with immunosurgery expression and chemotherapy sensitivity, demonstrating the usefulness of prognostication and chemotherapy for O.C (153). Xiang et al. conducted molecular subtyping of ferroptosis-related genes in ovarian cancer and developed a predictive model. They discovered that high-risk patients exhibited a tumor immune microenvironment with increased infiltration of M2 macrophages and reduced numbers of CD8+ T cells, which impaired immune responses and led to poor prognoses (154). Li and colleagues also construct risk models in conjunction with genes related to ferroptosis and cuprotosis, which can predict individual sensitivity to various immunotherapies and chemotherapy drugs based on specific groups, and have strong immune prediction and prognostic ability (155) (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The role of ferroptosis related gene in prediction and immunotherapy of ovarian cancer cell.

5 Conclusion and perspectives

As a new type of cell death found to be used to suppress tumor cells, ferroptosis is significant and has recently become a hotspot in the field of tumors. The regulatory role of specific mechanisms such as the GPX4 (157) and Xc system in ferroptosis and related pathways and targets has been gradually clarified. Many new mechanisms for ferroptosis, pathways and genes have been gradually discovered, but further research is still to be undertaken. Many of the currently known treatments for ovarian cancer are highly toxic and ineffective. Studies have found that ferroptosis combination therapy can help increase ovarian cancer sensitivity to the drug and improve the prognosis. The mechanism of ferroptosis is closely related to oxidative stress and ROS production, with research often focusing on mitochondria. Ferroptosis is characterized by distinct morphological changes, including smaller mitochondria, shriveled mitochondrial membranes, and reduced or absent mitochondrial cristae, while the cell membrane remains intact and the cell nucleus size remains normal (10). In ovarian cancer, PML-PGC-1α (107) can promote mitochondrial respiration, cysteine (158) restriction affects Fe-S cluster synthesis in mitochondria, and compounds like eriodictyol (40) and SPIO-serum (40) exacerbate mitochondrial dysfunction, all of which regulate ferroptosis. Recent studies have identified Mitotic Arrest Deficient 2 Like 2 (MAD2L2), an important tumor-associated protein primarily located in ribosomes, as having a potential role in mitochondrial elongation. MAD2L2 can promote ovarian cancer proliferation and migration by inhibiting ferroptosis and is closely associated with various immune cells. However, the specific and complete mechanisms and pathways of ferroptosis in mitochondria remain unclear. Future research in this area is expected to provide a more comprehensive understanding of ferroptosis (157).Furthermore, due to the immunosuppressive nature of ovarian cancer, single immunotherapy currently has good therapeutic effects in only a fraction of ovarian cancer patients, therapy combined with other new tumor treatments is a new research trend. Ferroptosis, as a new type of treatment, can not only play a role in suppressing ovarian tumors but also induce immunotherapy. However, immunosuppression of ovarian cancer has been found to reduce this combined effect and even lead to bad side effects. The study also found that it may be possible to inhibit the immunosuppressive microenvironment of ovarian tumors by targeting immune cells, thereby helping in the combination of ferroptosis inducers and immunotherapy. The application of nanomaterials in this field has endless potential and can be targeted therapeutically, inducing ferroptosis to produce the effect of immunotherapy and play more accurate, longer-lasting, and with fewer side effects. However, the specific mechanisms are not clear enough. In recent years, considerable research has been undertaken on immuno-predictive models built from bioinformatics and ferroptosis-related genes, which may help in the research and development of targets and drugs for ovarian cancer treatment. In the future, the association of ferroptosis-related inducers and inhibitors with other treatments for ovarian cancer is still worth exploring.

Author contributions

KG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ML: Writing – review & editing. JB: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. TY: Writing – review & editing. JG: Writing – review & editing. FR: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. LZ: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The present study was supported by scientific research fund project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (general project, 2021, Grant No. LJKZ0752); 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Cho KR, Shih I-M. Ovarian cancer. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. (2009) 4:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092246

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Yeung T-L, Leung CS, Yip K-P, Au Yeung CL, Wong STC, Mok SC. Cellular and molecular processes in ovarian cancer metastasis. A Review in the Theme: Cell and Molecular Processes in Cancer Metastasis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2015) 309:C444–456. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00188.2015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yang WS, Stockwell BR. Ferroptosis: death by lipid peroxidation. Trends Cell Biol. (2016) 26:165–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Stockwell BR, Angeli JPF, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon S, et al. Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. (2017) 171:273–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Dixon SJ, Stockwell BR. The hallmarks of ferroptosis. Annu Rev Cancer Biol. (2019) 3:35–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030518-055844

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cao JY, Dixon SJ. Mechanisms of ferroptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2016) 73:2195–209. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2194-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yang WS, SriRamaratnam R, Welsch ME, Shimada K, Skouta R, Viswanathan VS, et al. Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4. Cell. (2014) 156:317–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Li D, Zhang M, Chao H. Significance of glutathione peroxidase 4 and intracellular iron level in ovarian cancer cells—“utilization” of ferroptosis mechanism. Inflammation Res. (2021) 70:1177–89. doi: 10.1007/s00011-021-01495-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. (2012) 149:1060–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Guan J, Lo M, Dockery P, Mahon S, Karp CM, Buckley AR, et al. The xc- cystine/glutamate antiporter as a potential therapeutic target for small-cell lung cancer: use of sulfasalazine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. (2009) 64:463–72. doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0894-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sun X, Niu X, Chen R, He W, Chen D, Kang R, et al. Metallothionein-1G facilitates sorafenib resistance through inhibition of ferroptosis. Hepatology. (2016) 64:488–500. doi: 10.1002/hep.28574

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Jiang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang S-J, Su T, Hibshoosh H, et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumor suppression. Nature. (2015) 520:57–62. doi: 10.1038/nature14344

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Luo Y, Liu X, Chen Y, Tang Q, He C, Ding X, et al. Targeting PAX8 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to ferroptosis by inhibiting glutathione synthesis. Apoptosis. (2024). doi: 10.1007/s10495-024-01985-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Sbodio JI, Snyder SH, Paul BD. Regulators of the transsulfuration pathway. Br J Pharmacol. (2019) 176:583–93. doi: 10.1111/bph.14446

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Verschoor ML, Singh G. Ets-1 regulates intracellular glutathione levels: key target for resistant ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer. (2013) 12:138. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-138

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. MeiFang W, De-Guan L. Research progress of ferroptosis in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Chin Bullet Life Sci. (2019) 31(09):886–93. doi: 10.13376/j.cbls/2019109

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2021) 22:266–82. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00324-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Agmon E, Stockwell BR. Lipid homeostasis and regulated cell death. Curr Opin Chem Biol. (2017) 39:83–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.06.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Doll S, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Panzilius E, Kobayashi S, Ingold I, et al. ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition. Nat Chem Biol. (2017) 13:91–8. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2239

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bersuker K, Hendricks JM, Li Z, Magtanong L, Ford B, Tang PH, et al. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. (2019) 575:688–92. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Marshall KR, Gong M, Wodke L, Lamb JH, Jones DJL, Farmer PB, et al. The human apoptosis-inducing protein AMID is an oxidoreductase with a modified flavin cofactor and DNA binding activity. J Biol Chem. (2005) 280:30735–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414018200

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Dai E, Zhang W, Cong D, Kang R, Wang J, Tang D. AIFM2 blocks ferroptosis independent of ubiquinol metabolism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2020) 523:966–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.01.066

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Mao C, Liu X, Zhang Y, Lei G, Yan Y, Lee H, et al. DHODH-mediated ferroptosis defense is a targetable vulnerability in cancer. Nature. (2021) 593:586–90. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03539-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Kraft VAN, Bezjian CT, Pfeiffer S, Ringelstetter L, Müller C, Zandkarimi F, et al. GTP cyclohydrolase 1/tetrahydrobiopterin counteract ferroptosis through lipid remodeling. ACS Cent Sci. (2020) 6:41–53. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b01063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Shen Z, Liu T, Li Y, Lau J, Yang Z, Fan W, et al. Fenton-reaction-acceleratable magnetic nanoparticles for ferroptosis therapy of orthotopic brain tumors. ACS Nano. (2018) 12:11355–65. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b06201

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bellelli R, Federico G, Matte’ A, Colecchia D, Iolascon A, Chiariello M, et al. NCOA4 deficiency impairs systemic iron homeostasis. Cell Rep. (2016) 14:411–21. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.065

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Dey A, Varelas X, Guan K-L. Targeting the Hippo pathway in cancer, fibrosis, wound healing and regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. (2020) 19:480–94. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0070-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Yang W-H, Huang Z, Wu J, Ding C-KC, Murphy SK, Chi J-T. A TAZ-ANGPTL4-NOX2 axis regulates ferroptotic cell death and chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Res. (2020) 18:79–90. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-0691

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yang W-H, Lin C-C, Wu J, Chao P-Y, Chen K, Chen P-H, et al. The hippo pathway effector YAP promotes ferroptosis via the E3 ligase SKP2. Mol Cancer Res. (2021) 19:1005–14. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0534

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Anandhan A, Dodson M, Schmidlin CJ, Liu P, Zhang DD. Breakdown of an ironclad defense system: The critical role of NRF2 in mediating ferroptosis. Cell Chem Biol. (2020) 27:436–47. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.03.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wang Y, Yan S, Liu X, Deng F, Wang P, Yang L, et al. PRMT4 promotes ferroptosis to aggravate doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy via inhibition of the Nrf2/GPX4 pathway. Cell Death Differ. (2022) 29:1982–95. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00990-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Dang R, Wang M, Li X, Wang H, Liu L, Wu Q, et al. Edaravone ameliorates depressive and anxiety-like behaviors via Sirt1/Nrf2/HO-1/Gpx4 pathway. J Neuroinflamm. (2022) 19:41. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02400-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Chang L-C, Chiang S-K, Chen S-E, Yu Y-L, Chou R-H, Chang W-C. Heme oxygenase-1 mediates BAY 11–7085 induced ferroptosis. Cancer Lett. (2018) 416:124–37. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.12.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kerins MJ, Ooi A. The roles of NRF2 in modulating cellular iron homeostasis. Antioxidants Redox Signaling. (2018) 29:1756–73. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7176

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Yue W, Yupeng G, Jun C, Kui J. Apatinib combined with olaparib induces ferroptosis via a p53-dependent manner in ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2023) 149(11):681–9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04811-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Jing T, Guo Y, Wei Y. Carboxymethylated pachyman induces ferroptosis in ovarian cancer by suppressing NRF1/HO-1 signaling. Oncol Lett. (2022) 23:161. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13281

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhu X, Chen X, Qiu L, Zhu J, Wang J. Norcantharidin induces ferroptosis via the suppression of NRF2/HO-1 signaling in ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Lett. (2022) 24:359. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13479

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Ma B, Zhong Y, Chen R, Zhan X, Huang G, Xiong Y, et al. Tripterygium glycosides reverse chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer by targeting the NRF2/GPX4 signal axis to induce ferroptosis of drug-resistant human epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2023) 665:178–86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.04.111

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Wang X, Chen J, Tie H, Tian W, Zhao Y, Qin L, et al. Eriodictyol regulated ferroptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell viability via Nrf2/HO-1/NQO1 signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. (2023) 37(7):e23368. doi: 10.1002/jbt.23368

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Liu N, Lin X, Huang C. Activation of the reverse transsulfuration pathway through NRF2/CBS confers erastin-induced ferroptosis resistance. Br J Cancer. (2020) 122:279–92. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0660-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Zhou J, Wang Y, Fu Y, Lin Z, Lin H, Lv G, et al. Chelerythrine induces apoptosis and ferroptosis through Nrf2 in ovarian cancer cells. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). (2024) 70:174–81. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2024.70.3.26

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Anandhan A, Dodson M, Shakya A, Chen J, Liu P, Wei Y, et al. NRF2 controls iron homeostasis and ferroptosis through HERC2 and VAMP8. Sci Adv. (2023) 9:eade9585. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade9585

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Xu R, Wang W, Zhang W. Ferroptosis and the bidirectional regulatory factor p53. Cell Death Discovery. (2023) 9:197. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01517-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Guo X, Liu N, Liu M. Long non-coding RNA LINC00336 as an independentprognostic indicator and an oncogenic lncRNA in bladder cancer. Arch Med Sci. (2019) 19(2):478–87. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.89661

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Ou Y, Wang S-J, Li D, Chu B, Gu W. Activation of SAT1 engages polyamine metabolism with p53-mediated ferroptotic responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2016) 113:E6806–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607152113

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Xie Y, Zhu S, Song X, Sun X, Fan Y, Liu J, et al. The tumor suppressor p53 limits ferroptosis by blocking DPP4 activity. Cell Rep. (2017) 20:1692–704. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Liu Y, Gu W. p53 in ferroptosis regulation: the new weapon for the old guardian. Cell Death Differ. (2022) 29:895–910. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00943-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Venkatesh D, O’Brien NA, Zandkarimi F, Tong DR, Stokes ME, Dunn DE, et al. MDM2 and MDMX promote ferroptosis by PPARα-mediated lipid remodeling. Genes Dev. (2020) 34:526–43. doi: 10.1101/gad.334219.119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Hong T, Lei G, Chen X, Li H, Zhang X, Wu N, et al. PARP inhibition promotes ferroptosis via repressing SLC7A11 and synergizes with ferroptosis inducers in BRCA-proficient ovarian cancer. Redox Biol. (2021) 42:101928. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101928

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wang C-K, Chen T-J, Tan GYT, Chang F-P, Sridharan S, Yu C-HA, et al. MEX3A mediates p53 degradation to suppress ferroptosis and facilitate ovarian cancer tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. (2023) 83:251–63. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Fang R, Yunfei W, Jishui W. Exploration on role and mechanism of ursolic acid - Induced iron death in ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3 based on JNK / p53 pathway. Chin Arch Traditional Chin Med. (2021) 39:62–64+267. doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2021.07.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Tesfay L, Paul BT, Konstorum A, Deng Z, Cox AO, Lee J, et al. Stearoyl-coA desaturase 1 protects ovarian cancer cells from ferroptotic cell death. Cancer Res. (2019) 79:5355–66. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0369

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Xuan Y, Wang H, Yung MM, Chen F, Chan W-S, Chan Y-S, et al. SCD1/FADS2 fatty acid desaturases equipoise lipid metabolic activity and redox-driven ferroptosis in ascites-derived ovarian cancer cells. Theranostics. (2022) 12:3534–52. doi: 10.7150/thno.70194

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Kato I, Kasukabe T, Kumakura S. Menin−MLL inhibitors induce ferroptosis and enhance the anti−proliferative activity of auranofin in several types of cancer cells. Int J Oncol. (2020) 57(4):1057–71. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5116

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Liu Y, Liu X, Wang H, Ding P, Wang C. Agrimonolide inhibits cancer progression and induces ferroptosis and apoptosis by targeting SCD1 in ovarian cancer cells. Phytomedicine. (2022) 101:154102. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Carbone M, Melino G. Stearoyl coA desaturase regulates ferroptosis in ovarian cancer offering new therapeutic perspectives. Cancer Res. (2019) 79:5149–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2453

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. McCabe KE, Bacos K, Lu D, Delaney JR, Axelrod J, Potter MD, et al. Triggering necroptosis in cisplatin and IAP antagonist-resistant ovarian carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. (2014) 5:e1496–6. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.448

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Do M, Wu CCN, Sonavane PR, Juarez EF, Adams SR, Ross J, et al. A FZD7-specific antibody-drug conjugate induces ovarian tumor regression in preclinical models. Mol Cancer Ther. (2022) 21:113–24. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0548

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Wang Y, Zhao G, Condello S, Huang H, Cardenas H, Tanner EJ, et al. Frizzled-7 identifies platinum-tolerant ovarian cancer cells susceptible to ferroptosis. Cancer Res. (2021) 81:384–99. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1488

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Zhang D, Qu B, Hu B, Cao K, Shen H. MiR-1-3p enhances the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to ferroptosis by targeting FZD7. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. (2022) 47:1512–21. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210800

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Jin Y, Chen L, Li L, Huang G, Huang H, Tang C. SNAI2 promotes the development of ovarian cancer through regulating ferroptosis. Bioengineered. (2022) 13:6451–63. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2024319

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Zhang X, Zheng X, Ying X, Xie W, Yin Y, Wang X. CEBPG suppresses ferroptosis through transcriptional control of SLC7A11 in ovarian cancer. J Transl Med. (2023) 21:334. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04136-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Wang Y, Wang S, Zhang W. HRD1 functions as a tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer by facilitating ubiquitination-dependent SLC7A11 degradation. Cell Cycle. (2023) 22:1116–26. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2023.2178102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Bai P, Cantó C. The role of PARP-1 and PARP-2 enzymes in metabolic regulation and disease. Cell Metab. (2012) 16:290–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.06.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Konstantinopoulos PA, Ceccaldi R, Shapiro GI, D’Andrea AD. Homologous recombination deficiency: exploiting the fundamental vulnerability of ovarian cancer. Cancer Discovery. (2015) 5:1137–54. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0714

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Tang S, Shen Y, Wei X, Shen Z, Lu W, Xu J. Olaparib synergizes with arsenic trioxide by promoting apoptosis and ferroptosis in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:826. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05257-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Zhou J, Pang Y, Zhang W, OuYang F, Lin H, Li X, et al. Discovery of a novel stilbene derivative as a microtubule targeting agent capable of inducing cell ferroptosis. J Med Chem. (2022) 65:4687–708. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01775

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Puxeddu M, Wu J, Bai R, D’Ambrosio M, Nalli M, Coluccia A, et al. Induction of ferroptosis in glioblastoma and ovarian cancers by a new pyrrole tubulin assembly inhibitor. J Med Chem. (2022) 65:15805–18. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01457

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Zuo Y-B, Zhang Y-F, Zhang R, Tian J-W, Lv X-B, Li R, et al. Ferroptosis in cancer progression: role of noncoding RNAs. Int J Biol Sci. (2022) 18:1829–43. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.66917

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Ma L-L, Liang L, Zhou D, Wang S-W. Tumor suppressor miR-424-5p abrogates ferroptosis in ovarian cancer through targeting ACSL4. neo. (2021) 68:165–73. doi: 10.4149/neo_2020_200707N705

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Sangokoya C, Doss JF, Chi J-T. Iron-responsive miR-485-3p regulates cellular iron homeostasis by targeting ferroportin. PloS Genet. (2013) 9:e1003408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003408

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Sun D, Li Y-C, Zhang X-Y. Lidocaine promoted ferroptosis by targeting miR-382-5p /SLC7A11 axis in ovarian and breast cancer. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:681223. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.681223

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Jin Y, Qiu J, Lu X, Ma Y, Li G. LncRNA CACNA1G-AS1 up-regulates FTH1 to inhibit ferroptosis and promote Malignant phenotypes in ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Res. (2023) 31:169–79. doi: 10.32604/or.2023.027815

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Zhou X, Zhan L, Huang K, Wang X. The functions and clinical significance of circRNAs in hematological Malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13:138. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00976-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Qin K, Zhang F, Wang H, Wang N, Qiu H, Jia X, et al. circRNA circSnx12 confers Cisplatin chemoresistance to ovarian cancer by inhibiting ferroptosis through a miR-194-5p/SLC7A11 axis. BMB Rep. (2023) 56:184–9. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2022-0175

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Zhang Y, Xia M, Zhou Z, Hu X, Wang J, Zhang M, et al. p53 promoted ferroptosis in ovarian cancer cells treated with human serum incubated-superparamagnetic iron oxides. IJN. (2021) 16:283–96. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S282489

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Dong H, He L, Sun Q, Zhan J, Li J, Xiong X, et al. Inhibit ALDH3A2 reduce ovarian cancer cells survival via elevating ferroptosis sensitivity. Gene. (2023) 876:147515. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147515

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Cai L, Hu X, Ye L, Bai P, Jie Y, Shu K. Long non-coding RNA ADAMTS9-AS1 attenuates ferroptosis by Targeting microRNA-587/solute carrier family 7 member 11 axis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Bioengineered. (2002) 13:8226–39. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2049470

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Yamaguchi K, Kitamura S, Furutake Y, Murakami R, Yamanoi K, Taki M, et al. Acquired evolution of mitochondrial metabolism regulated by HNF1B in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). (2021) 13:2413. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102413

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Li J, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Cui Y, Liu H, Li M, et al. Downregulation of HNF1 homeobox B is associated with drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. (2014) 32(3):979–88. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3297

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Takahashi R, Kamizaki K, Yamanaka K, Terai Y, Minami Y. Expression of Ferredoxin1 in cisplatin−resistant ovarian cancer cells confers their resistance against ferroptosis induced by cisplatin. Oncol Rep. (2023) 49:124. doi: 10.3892/or.2023.8561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Jin Y, Qiu J, Lu X, Li G. C-MYC inhibited ferroptosis and promoted immune evasion in ovarian cancer cells through NCOA4 mediated ferritin autophagy. Cells. (2022) 11:4127. doi: 10.3390/cells11244127

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Wang X, Xu Z, Ren X, Chen X, Yi Q, Zeng S, et al. MTHFR inhibits TRC8-mediated HMOX1 ubiquitination and regulates ferroptosis in ovarian cancer. Clin Transl Med. (2022) 12:e1013. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Efferth T. From ancient herb to modern drug: Artemisia annua and artemisinin for cancer therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. (2017) 46:65–83. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.02.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Greenshields AL, Shepherd TG, Hoskin DW. Contribution of reactive oxygen species to ovarian cancer cell growth arrest and killing by the anti-malarial drug artesunate. Mol Carcinog. (2017) 56:75–93. doi: 10.1002/mc.v56.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Woo JH, Shimoni Y, Yang WS, Subramaniam P, Iyer A, Nicoletti P, et al. Elucidating compound mechanism of action by network perturbation analysis. Cell. (2015) 162:441–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.056

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. You Y, Fan Q, Huang J, Wu Y, Lin H, Zhang Q. Ferroptosis-related gene signature promotes ovarian cancer by influencing immune infiltration and invasion. J Oncol. (2021) 2021:9915312. doi: 10.1155/2021/9915312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Choi J-A, Lee EH, Cho H, Kim J-H. High-dose selenium induces ferroptotic cell death in ovarian cancer. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:1918. doi: 10.3390/ijms24031918

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Xiong Y, Liu T, Chen J. Anisomycin has the potential to induce human ovarian cancer stem cell ferroptosis by influencing glutathione metabolism and autophagy signal transduction pathways. J Cancer. (2023) 14:1202–15. doi: 10.7150/jca.83355

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Ebrahimi B, Viswanadhapalli S, Pratap UP, Rahul G, Yang X, Pitta Venkata P, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of the LIF/LIFR autocrine loop reveals vulnerability of ovarian cancer cells to ferroptosis. NPJ Precis Oncol. (2024) 8:118. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00612-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Shen Z, Song J, Yung BC, Zhou Z, Wu A, Chen X. Emerging strategies of cancer therapy based on ferroptosis. Adv Mater. (2018) 30:e1704007. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Lu J, Tai Z, Wu J, Li L, Zhang T, Liu J, et al. Nanomedicine-induced programmed cell death enhances tumor immunotherapy. J Adv Res. (2024) 14:199–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.09.018

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Zhou H-H, Chen X, Cai L-Y, Nan X-W, Chen J-H, Chen X-X, et al. Erastin reverses ABCB1-mediated docetaxel resistance in ovarian cancer. Front Oncol. (2019) 9:1398. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01398

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Asif K, Adeel M, Rahman MM, Caligiuri I, Perin T, Cemazar M, et al. Iron nitroprusside as a chemodynamic agent and inducer of ferroptosis for ovarian cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. (2023) 11:3124–35. doi: 10.1039/D2TB02691K

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Cang W, Wu A, Gu L, Wang W, Tian Q, Zheng Z, et al. Erastin enhances metastatic potential of ferroptosis-resistant ovarian cancer cells by M2 polarization through STAT3/IL-8 axis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2022) 113:109422. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109422

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Mao G, Xin D, Wang Q, Lai D. Sodium molybdate inhibits the growth of ovarian cancer cells via inducing both ferroptosis and apoptosis. Free Radical Biol Med. (2022) 182:79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.02.023

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Jiang Q, Wang K, Zhang X, Ouyang B, Liu H, Pang Z, et al. Platelet membrane-camouflaged magnetic nanoparticles for ferroptosis-enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Small. (2020) 16:2001704. doi: 10.1002/smll.202001704

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Battaglia AM, Sacco A, Perrotta ID, Faniello MC, Scalise M, Torella D, et al. Iron administration overcomes resistance to erastin-mediated ferroptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:868351. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.868351

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Chekerov R, Hilpert F, Mahner S, El-Balat A, Harter P, De Gregorio N, et al. Sorafenib plus topotecan versus placebo plus topotecan for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TRIAS): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. (2018) 19:1247–58. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30372-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Chan DW, Yung MM, Chan Y-S, Xuan Y, Yang H, Xu D, et al. MAP30 protein from Momordica charantia is therapeutic and has synergic activity with cisplatin against ovarian cancer in vivo by altering metabolism and inducing ferroptosis. Pharmacol Res. (2020) 161:105157. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Liu W, Chen H, Zhu Z, Liu Z, Ma C, Lee YJ, et al. Ferroptosis inducer improves the efficacy of oncolytic virus-mediated cancer immunotherapy. Biomedicines. (2022) 10:1425. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061425

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Li H, Liu M, Jiang X, Song T, Feng S, Wu J, et al. GALNT14 regulates ferroptosis and apoptosis of ovarian cancer through the EGFR/mTOR pathway. Future Oncol. (2022) 18:149–61. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0883

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Lin C-C, Chi J-T. Ferroptosis of epithelial ovarian cancer: genetic determinants and therapeutic potential. Oncotarget. (2020) 11:3562–70. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.v11i39

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Cang W, Wu A, Divin , Qiu L, et al. Ferroptosis inducer Erastin enhances cisplatin sensitivity in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells by activating apoptosis. Department Obstetrics Gynecology. (2020) 29:730–3. doi: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2020.10.030

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Wu X, Shen S, Qin J, Fei W, Fan F, Gu J, et al. High co-expression of SLC7A11 and GPX4 as a predictor of platinum resistance and poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynecology. (2022) 129:40–9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17327

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Gentric G, Kieffer Y, Mieulet V, Goundiam O, Bonneau C, Nemati F, et al. PML-regulated mitochondrial metabolism enhances chemosensitivity in human ovarian cancers. Cell Metab. (2019) 29:156–173.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Zhang S, Liu Q, Chang M, Pan Y, Yahaya BH, Liu Y, et al. Chemotherapy impairs ovarian function through excessive ROS-induced ferroptosis. Cell Death Dis. (2023) 14:340. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05859-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Jiang Z, Lim S-O, Yan M, Hsu JL, Yao J, Wei Y, et al. TYRO3 induces anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy resistance by limiting innate immunity and tumoral ferroptosis. J Clin Invest. (2021) 131:e139434. doi: 10.1172/JCI139434

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Lang X, Green MD, Wang W, Yu J, Choi JE, Jiang L, et al. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy promote tumoral lipid oxidation and ferroptosis via synergistic repression of SLC7A11. Cancer Discovery. (2019) 9:1673–85. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Morand S, Devanaboyina M, Staats H, Stanbery L, Nemunaitis J. Ovarian cancer immunotherapy and personalized medicine. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22(12):6532. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126532

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Chen J, Wei Z, Fu K, Duan Y, Zhang M, Li K, et al. Non-apoptotic cell death in ovarian cancer: Treatment, resistance and prognosis. Biomedicine Pharmacotherapy. (2022) 150:112929. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112929

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Hänggi K, Vasilikos L, Valls AF, Yerbes R, Knop J, Spilgies LM, et al. RIPK1/RIPK3 promotes vascular permeability to allow tumor cell extravasation independent of its necroptotic function. Cell Death Dis. (2017) 8:e2588. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.20

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Song J, Liu T, Yin Y, Zhao W, Lin Z, Yin Y, et al. The deubiquitinase OTUD1 enhances iron transport and potentiates host antitumor immunity. EMBO Rep. (2021) 22(2):e51162. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051162

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Säve S, Persson K. Extracellular ATP and P2Y receptor activation induce a proinflammatory host response in the human urinary tract. Infect Immun. (2010) 78:3609–15. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00074-10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Wen Q, Liu J, Kang R, Zhou B, Tang D. The release and activity of HMGB1 in ferroptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2019) 510:278–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.01.090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Wang W, Green M, Choi JE, Gijón M, Kennedy PD, Johnson JK, et al. CD8+ T cells regulate tumor ferroptosis during cancer immunotherapy. Nature. (2019) 569(7755):270–4. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1170-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Kim DH, Kim WD, Kim SK, Moon DH, Lee SJ. TGF-β1-mediated repression of SLC7A11 drives vulnerability to GPX4 inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:406. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2618-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Luo X, Gong H-B, Gao H-Y, Wu Y-P, Sun W-Y, Li Z-Q, et al. Oxygenated phosphatidylethanolamine navigates phagocytosis of ferroptotic cells by interacting with TLR2. Cell Death Differ. (2021) 28:1971–89. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00719-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Xu C, Sun S, Johnson T, Qi R, Zhang S, Zhang J, et al. The glutathione peroxidase Gpx4 prevents lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis to sustain Treg cell activation and suppression of antitumor immunity. Cell Rep. (2021) 35:109235. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Drijvers JM, Gillis JE, Muijlwijk T, Nguyen TH, Gaudiano EF, Harris IS, et al. Pharmacologic screening identifies metabolic vulnerabilities of CD8+ T cells. Cancer Immunol Res. (2021) 9:184–99. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0384

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Kapralov AA, Yang Q, Dar HH, Tyurina YY, Anthonymuthu TS, Kim R, et al. Redox lipid reprogramming commands susceptibility of macrophages and microglia to ferroptotic death. Nat Chem Biol. (2020) 16:278–90. doi: 10.1038/s41589-019-0462-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Wang D, DuBois RN. Immunosuppression associated with chronic inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. Carcinogenesis. (2015) 36:1085–93. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Böttcher JP, Bonavita E, Chakravarty P, Blees H, Cabeza-Cabrerizo M, Sammicheli S, et al. NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of cDC1 into the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Cancer Immune Control. Cell. (2018) 172:1022–1037.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Veglia F, Tyurin VA, Blasi M, De Leo A, Kossenkov AV, Donthireddy L, et al. Fatty acid transport protein 2 reprograms neutrophils in cancer. Nature. (2019) 569:73–8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1118-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Kalinski P. Regulation of immune responses by prostaglandin E2. J Immunol. (2012) 188:21–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Tang R, Xu J, Zhang B, Liu J, Liang C, Hua J, et al. Ferroptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis in anticancer immunity. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13:110. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00946-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Srivastava MK, Sinha P, Clements VK, Rodriguez P, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells inhibit T-cell activation by depleting cystine and cysteine. Cancer Res. (2010) 70:68–77. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2587

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

129. O’Donnell JS, Teng MWL, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting and resistance to T cell-based immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2019) 16:151–67. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0142-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Bear AS, Vonderheide RH, O’Hara MH. Challenges and opportunities for pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. (2020) 38:788–802. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Baert T, Vankerckhoven A, Riva M, Van Hoylandt A, Thirion G, Holger G, et al. Myeloid derived suppressor cells: key drivers of immunosuppression in ovarian cancer. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1273. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Horikawa N, Abiko K, Matsumura N, Hamanishi J, Baba T, Yamaguchi K, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian cancer inhibits tumor immunity through the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Clin Cancer Res. (2017) 23:587–99. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0387

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Komura N, Mabuchi S, Shimura K, Yokoi E, Kozasa K, Kuroda H, et al. The role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in increasing cancer stem-like cells and promoting PD-L1 expression in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2020) 69:2477–99. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02628-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Guo P, Wang L, Shang W, Chen J, Chen Z, Xiong F, et al. Intravesical in situ immunostimulatory gel for triple therapy of bladder cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. (2020) 12:54367–77. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c15176

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Ma X, Xiao L, Liu L, Ye L, Su P, Bi E, et al. CD36-mediated ferroptosis dampens intratumoral CD8+ T cell effector function and impairs their antitumor ability. Cell Metab. (2021) 33:1001–1012.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.02.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Ugolini A, Tyurin VA, Tyurina YY, Tcyganov EN, Donthireddy L, Kagan VE, et al. Polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells limit antigen cross-presentation by dendritic cells in cancer. JCI Insight. (2020) 5:e138581. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.138581

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Zhang H, Zhuo Y, Li D, Zhang L, Gao Q, Yang L, et al. Dihydroartemisinin inhibits the growth of pancreatic cells by inducing ferroptosis and activating antitumor immunity. Eur J Pharmacol. (2022) 926:175028. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Conche C, Finkelmeier F, Pešić M, Nicolas AM, Böttger TW, Kennel KB, et al. Combining ferroptosis induction with MDSC blockade renders primary tumors and metastases in liver sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade. Gut. (2023) 72(9):1774–82. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327909

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Zhu H, Klement JD, Lu C, Redd PS, Yang D, Smith AD, et al. Asah2 represses the p53-hmox1 axis to protect myeloid-derived suppressor cells from ferroptosis. J Immunol. (2021) 206:1395–404. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000500

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Zhang F, Li F, Lu G-H, Nie W, Zhang L, Lv Y, et al. Engineering magnetosomes for ferroptosis/immunomodulation synergism in cancer. ACS Nano. (2019) 13:5662–73. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00892

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Yang L, Tian S, Chen Y, Miao C, Zhao Y, Wang R, et al. Ferroptosis-related gene model to predict overall survival of ovarian carcinoma. J Oncol. (2021) 2021:6687391. doi: 10.1155/2021/6687391

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Immunotherapy activates unexpected cell death mechanism. Cancer Discovery. (2019) 9:OF2. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2019-058

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Li Y, Zhang Q, Wu M, Zhang P, Huang L, Ai X, et al. Suppressing MDSC infiltration in tumor microenvironment serves as an option for treating ovarian cancer metastasis. Int J Biol Sci. (2022) 18:3697–713. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.70013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Yu Z, He H, Chen Y, Ji Q, Sun M. A novel ferroptosis related gene signature is associated with prognosis in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:11486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90126-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Cheng Z, Chen Y, Huang H. Identification and validation of a novel prognostic signature based on ferroptosis-related genes in ovarian cancer. Vaccines (Basel). (2023) 11:205. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020205

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Ye Y, Dai Q, Li S, He J, Qi H. A novel defined risk signature of the ferroptosis-related genes for predicting the prognosis of ovarian cancer. Front Mol Biosci. (2021) 8:645845. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.645845

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Hu K, Zhang X, Zhou L, Li J. Downregulated PRNP facilitates cell proliferation and invasion and has effect on the immune regulation in ovarian cancer. J Immunol Res. (2022) 2022:3205040. doi: 10.1155/2022/3205040

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Liu Y, Du S, Yuan M, He X, Zhu C, Han K, et al. Identification of a novel ferroptosis-related gene signature associated with prognosis, the immune landscape, and biomarkers for immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:949126. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.949126

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Yang J, Wang C, Cheng S, Zhang Y, Jin Y, Zhang N, et al. Construction and validation of a novel ferroptosis-related signature for evaluating prognosis and immune microenvironment in ovarian cancer. Front Genet. (2022) 13:1094474. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1094474

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Wang H, Cheng Q, Chang K, Bao L, Yi X. Integrated analysis of ferroptosis-related biomarker signatures to improve the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of ovarian cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2022) 9:807862. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.807862

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Yuan X, Zhou Q, Zhang F, Zheng W, Liu H, Chen A, et al. Identification of immunity- and ferroptosis-related genes for predicting the prognosis of serous ovarian cancer. Gene. (2022) 838:146701. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146701

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Xiong T, Wang Y, Zhu C. A risk model based on 10 ferroptosis regulators and markers established by LASSO-regularized linear Cox regression has a good prognostic value for ovarian cancer patients. Diagn Pathol. (2024) 19:4. doi: 10.1186/s13000-023-01414-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Li S, Cao T, Wu T, Xu J, Shen C, Hou S, et al. Identification of a ferroptosis- and oxidative stress-associated gene signature for prognostic stratification of ovarian cancer. Am J Transl Res. (2023) 15:2645–55.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

154. Sun X, He W, Lin B, Huang W, Ye D. Defining three ferroptosis-based molecular subtypes and developing a prognostic risk model for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Aging (Albany NY). (2024) 16:9106–26. doi: 10.18632/aging.v16i10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Li Y, Fang T, Shan W, Gao Q. Identification of a novel model for predicting the prognosis and immune response based on genes related to cuproptosis and ferroptosis in ovarian cancer. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15:579. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030579

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Zhang J, Xi J, Huang P, Zeng S. Comprehensive analysis identifies potential ferroptosis-associated mRNA therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer. Front Med. (2021) 8:644053. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.644053

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Xu K, Zheng X, Shi H, Ou J, Ding H. MAD2L2, a key regulator in ovarian cancer and promoting tumor progression. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50744-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Novera W, Lee Z-W, Nin DS, Dai MZ-Y, Binte Idres S, Wu H, et al. Cysteine deprivation targets ovarian clear cell carcinoma via oxidative stress and iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis deficit. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2020) 33:1191–208. doi: 10.1089/ars.2019.7850

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ferroptosis, ovarian cancer, Xc system, MDSC, immunotherapy

Citation: Guo K, Lu M, Bi J, Yao T, Gao J, Ren F and Zhu L (2024) Ferroptosis: mechanism, immunotherapy and role in ovarian cancer. Front. Immunol. 15:1410018. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1410018

Received: 31 March 2024; Accepted: 24 July 2024;
Published: 13 August 2024.

Edited by:

Shensi Shen, Sichuan University, China

Reviewed by:

Ankita Leekha, University of Houston, United States
Qiming Gong, Southwest Medical University, China

Copyright © 2024 Guo, Lu, Bi, Yao, Gao, Ren and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Liancheng Zhu, zhulc@cmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.