Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Immunol., 20 February 2024
Sec. Alloimmunity and Transplantation
This article is part of the Research Topic Regulatory immune cells in organ transplantation View all 9 articles

Editorial: Regulatory immune cells in organ transplantation

Hongxuan Ma&#x;Hongxuan Ma1†Jiajia Sun&#x;Jiajia Sun1†Xiaohu LiXiaohu Li1Yongsheng Luo*Yongsheng Luo1*Jia Liu*Jia Liu2*Jinfeng Li*Jinfeng Li1*
  • 1Kidney Transplantation Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2Dietetics Teaching and Research Section, Henan Medical College, Xinzheng, China

Organ transplantation serves as a critical treatment for organ failure, facing a substantial challenge in maintaining long-term graft function due to immune-induced rejection. The pursuit of immune tolerance is imperative to liberate patients from reliance on immunosuppressive drugs. Regulatory immune cells were reported to contribute to immune homeostasis reconstruction and the induction of immune tolerance by restricting excessive immune responses. However, the mechanisms and effects of various immune cell subsets with immunomodulatory functions such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) in transplantation and tolerance induction remain incompletely understood (1). This Research Topic highlights the studies on regulatory immune cells in organ transplantation presented in the Research Topic to clarify the mechanism of immunoregulation and explore new therapeutic approaches.

Jin et al. developed a noninvasive technique for quantifying granzyme B (GzB) in cardiac allograft rejection using targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. The study offered a safer alternative to endomyocardial biopsy which is regarded as gold standard by using microbubbles conjugated with anti-GzB antibodies to detect and quantify GzB expression. This approach effectively distinguished the difference between allogeneic (subject to rejection) and isogeneic (not subject to rejection) transplanted hearts based on GzB levels, indicating the potential as a novel tool for early detection of acute cardiac transplant rejection.

Poznansky et al. shed light on B-regulatory cells (Bregs), a subset of B-cells with tolerogenic functions. Bregs played a pivotal role in fostering graft acceptance within a tolerogenic milieu by secreting anti-inflammatory or tolerogenic cytokines. The study proposed a three-prong strategy, leveraging the complexity of TNF-α properties and engaging TNFR2 and TLR pathways, as a potential therapeutic approach to overcoming transplant rejection and promoting graft tolerance. LeGuern and Markmann provided a comprehensive overview of Tregs and their role as either permanent or temporary suppressors of immunity. By challenging the conventional understanding of Treg function, this study opened new avenues for developing therapies aimed at inducing transplant tolerance, emphasizing the nuanced and context-dependent nature of Treg-mediated immune regulation. Meanwhile, Cheng et al. reported the role of DNA-dependent activator of IFN regulatory factors (DAI) in alloimmune response after transplantation by targeting dendritic cells (DCs). The study reported that inhibition of the DAI led to reduced expression of co-stimulatory molecules and MHC-II on DCs and increased phagocytic ability, which promoted Treg differentiation and further highlighted a potential therapeutic strategy for improving transplant outcomes. Ali et al. explored the association between Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class II alleles and rheumatoid arthritis risk, which offered a glimpse into the genetic underpinnings that may influence immune responses in a broader context including transplantation.

Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, Rendina et al. delved into the immune response of solid organ transplant recipients. Specifically, the liver transplant recipients exhibit a similar risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, mortality, and lethality as the general population, which challenged previous assumptions and possibly was may be linked to the grafted liver’s ability to induce immunotolerance.

Immunosuppression improves the organ transplant survival but increases susceptibility to fungal infections. Elalouf et al. addressed the delicate balance between immune responses and fungal infections in transplant recipients. Acknowledging the heightened susceptibility to fungal infections in immunosuppressed patients, the review emphasized early diagnosis and exploresd potential immuno-modulating treatments that leveraged innate immune responses. The integration of single-cell technologies with machine learning emerged as a promising avenue for biomarker discovery. Hu et al. brought attention to posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs), a serious complication following solid organ transplantation (2). The case study of a lung transplant recipient with EBV-associated PTLD underscored the challenges in determining therapeutic intervention thresholds and the importance of monitoring EBV-DNA load. Meanwhile, the study emphasized the urgency for early diagnosis to enhance the likelihood of successful treatment.

This Research Topic illuminated the current state of research in the field of organ transplantation immunology by weaving together the findings from these studies. We underscored regulatory immune cells importance in immune tolerance and assessed their potential in diagnosis and therapy. Thus, the Research Topic unravelled the complexities of the immune system in organ transplantation and set a framework for future research directions that which devoted to improve patient outcomes and graft longevity.

Author contributions

HM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. JL: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JFL: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Santosh Nirmala S, Kayani K, Gliwiński M, Hu Y, Iwaszkiewicz-Grześ D, Piotrowska-Mieczkowska M, et al. Beyond FOXP3: a 20-year journey unravelling human regulatory T-cell heterogeneity. Front Immunol (2023) 14:1321228. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1321228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Stojanova J, Caillard S, Rousseau A, Marquet P. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD): Pharmacological, virological and other determinants. Pharmacol Res Jan (2011) 63:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2010.10.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: regulatory immune cells, organ transplantation, tolerance, immunosuppression, immune response

Citation: Ma H, Sun J, Li X, Luo Y, Liu J and Li J (2024) Editorial: Regulatory immune cells in organ transplantation. Front. Immunol. 15:1383563. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1383563

Received: 07 February 2024; Accepted: 08 February 2024;
Published: 20 February 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Antoine Toubert, Université Paris Cité, France

Copyright © 2024 Ma, Sun, Li, Luo, Liu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jinfeng Li, jinfenglis512@126.com; Jia Liu, liujia512@126.com; Yongsheng Luo, yongshengluo@126.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.