Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 22 March 2024
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders
This article is part of the Research Topic Predictive and Diagnostic Approaches for Systemic Disorders Using Ocular Assessment View all 11 articles

Association of autoimmune and allergic diseases with senile cataract: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Weichen Yuan,Weichen Yuan1,2Xiangrui Li,Xiangrui Li1,2Guan Wang,Guan Wang1,2Bo Qu,*Bo Qu1,2*Fangkun Zhao,*Fangkun Zhao1,2*
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 2Key Lens Research Laboratory of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China

Background: Many observational studies have been reported that patients with autoimmune or allergic diseases seem to have a higher risk of developing senile cataract, but the views are not consistent. In order to minimize the influence of reverse causality and potential confounding factors, we performed Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the genetic causal associations between autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataract.

Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ten common autoimmune and allergic diseases were obtained from the IEU Open genome-wide association studies (GWAS) database. Summary-level GWAS statistics for clinically diagnosed senile cataract were obtained from the FinnGen research project GWAS, which consisted of 59,522 individuals with senile cataracts and 312,864 control individuals. MR analysis was conducted using mainly inverse variance weighted (IVW) method and further sensitivity analysis was performed to test robustness.

Results: As for ten diseases, IVW results confirmed that type 1 diabetes (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.05-1.08; p = 2.24×10-12), rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.02-1.08; p = 1.83×10-4), hypothyroidism (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.42-4.06; p = 1.12×10-3), systemic lupus erythematosus (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.03; p = 2.27×10-3), asthma (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.03; p = 1.2×10-3) and allergic rhinitis (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.02-1.11; p = 2.15×10-3) were correlated with the risk of senile cataract. Celiac disease (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.08; P = 0.0437) and atopic dermatitis (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.01-1.10; P = 0.0426) exhibited a suggestive connection with senile cataract after Bonferroni correction. These associations are consistent across weighted median and MR Egger methods, with similar causal estimates in direction and magnitude. Sensitivity analysis further proved that these associations were reliable.

Conclusions: The results of the MR analysis showed that there were causal relationships between type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, hypothyroidism, systemic lupus erythematosus, asthma, allergic rhinitis and senile cataract. To clarify the possible role of autoimmune and allergy in the pathophysiology of senile cataract, further studies are needed.

Introduction

Senile cataract, also known as age-related cataract, is one of the leading causes of treatable blindness in the world, affecting 17% of the global population (1). Senile cataract is the most common type of cataract among adults, with onset between ages of 45 and 50. Even with the rapid development of cataract surgery, senile cataract still causes a huge disease and economic burden, especially in developing countries (2). Identifying potential risk factors to determine the mechanism of cataract formation and preventive methods is therefore of paramount importance. Currently, risk factors such as ageing, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and diabetes have been proved to contribute to the occurrence of cataract (37). However, the influence of immune related diseases as risk factors on cataract is not well studied.

Protecting the host from infection is the primary function of the immune system. The inability to distinguish self from non-self is often referred to as a breach of tolerance and is the underlying mechanism for autoimmune disease. The overall prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the general population is in the range of 3-5% (8). There are almost 100 different types of autoimmune diseases, the most common of which are autoimmune thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes (T1D) (9). The incidence of allergic diseases, represented by asthma, atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic rhinitis (AR) , has increased dramatically in the past three decades, and now affects approximately 20% of the population, becoming a public health problem that imposes a heavy burden on society (10). Evidence from previous observational studies suggests that some autoimmune and allergic diseases, such as celiac disease (CeD) (11), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (12), T1D (13), multiple sclerosis (MS) (14), psoriasis (15), asthma (16) and AR (17) may increase the risk of cataracts. These observational studies tend to be susceptible to selection bias, residual confounders and reverse causation. Thus, assessing the causal relationship between autoimmune and allergic diseases and the development of senile cataract can provide clues for the etiology of senile cataract.

Mendelian randomization (MR), as an epidemiological approach, has been widely used to evaluate the potential causal association between exposures and disease results (18). This approach minimizes residual confounding because genetic variants are randomly assembled at the time of conception and are therefore independent of personal lifestyle and environmental factors (19). At the same time, the interference of reverse causality can also be avoided (20). Compared with the gold standard randomized controlled trial (RCT) that established causality, MR used data from large-scale GWAS which is timelier and the sample size is larger. In addition, sometimes randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because they are costly, unfair, and even unethical. MR studies can overcome these shortcomings while results are broadly consistent with RCTs (21).

Lens epithelial cells are the most active metabolic cells in the lens, which undergo oxidation, insolubility and cross-linking during cataract formation. These cells then migrate to the lens equator to form lens fibers, which are gradually compressed in the center, resulting in hardening and opacity of the lens nucleus (22). The pathophysiological mechanism of lens opacity in cataract is usually attributed to oxidative stress (23). Studies on the mechanisms of autoimmunity or allergy in patients with cataract are not common and have only been reported in a few publications (2426). It is still unclear whether autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataract are linked through a shared genetic etiology. To our knowledge, there are currently no MR study evaluating the association between autoimmunity, allergic disease and senile cataract. Through this study, it is possible for us to reveal the genetic characteristics and immune related biological processes associated with senile cataract, bridging the significant knowledge gap about the complex causes of this disease.

Methods

MR assumptions and study design

T1D, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), hypothyroidism, SLE, CeD, MS, psoriasis, asthma, AR and atopic dermatitis (AD) included in our study were determined according to previously published observational studies. In order to assess the causal connections between senile cataract and these diseases, we conducted a two-sample MR analysis. Summary-level data from the GWASs were obtained for autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataract. In order to obtain reliable results, the MR analysis meets the following three assumptions (1) instrumental variables (IVs) finally included in the use must be closely related to autoimmune or allergic diseases; (2) IVs and confounding factors (affecting autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataract) were independent of each other; (3) IVs only affect senile cataract only through autoimmune or allergic disease. Figure 1 shows the flow chart of MR research between autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataract and three MR assumptions. To minimize bias due to ethnic stratification, we restricted included individuals to European population.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 The flow chart of MR research and three MR assumptions.

Exposure sources of autoimmune and allergic diseases

Summary level data for all 10 exposures were obtained from Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open GWAS database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). We prioritized using the GWAS dataset with the largest samples size as exposures. If any of the following three situations occur, we will select other relatively large GWAS data: 1) insufficient instrumental variables; 2) racial differences or sample overlap; 3) significant pleiotropy in preliminary analysis. Ultimately, summary GWAS data for hypothyroidism and psoriasis were from UK Biobank. The GWAS summary data for T1D (27), RA (28), CeD (29), SLE (30), MS (31), asthma (32), AR (33) and AD (34) were abstracted from different publicly available GWASs. Detailed information for the data sources was presented in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Sources and characteristics of exposure.

A quality check of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is performed to meet the basic assumptions of MR: (1) SNPs associated with autoimmune diseases reached the genome-wide significance threshold (P<5×10-8). (2) We further clumped the SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis (R2 < 0.001, clumping distance = 10,000kb). (3) The palindromic SNPs with intermediate allele frequencies were eliminated. (4) When the original SNP was not available, proxy SNPs with r2 > 0.9 according to LD link (https://ldlink.nci.nih.gov/) were used. To ensure robust associations between instrumental and endogenous variables and to prevent weak instrumental variable bias, we calculated R2 [R2 = 2 × EAF × (1 − EAF) × b2], representing the proportion of variation explained by instrumental variable SNPs. Simultaneously, we performed calculations of the F-statistic [F = R2 × (N − 2) / (1 − R2)] to assess the potency of IVs, whereby IVs with an F-statistic exceeding 10 are deemed to be valid (35).

Outcome sources of senile cataract

To reduce bias due to sample overlap, the summary statistics for the senile cataract GWAS were selected from the FinnGen research project (https://r9.finngen.fi/), including 59,522 cases of senile cataracts and 312,864 cases of population controls. This study defines senile cataract by H25 of the International Classification of Disease-10 (36).

All analyses were based on publicly shared databases and no additional ethical approvals were required.

Statistical analysis

MR analysis

The “TwoSampleMR” R package (version 0.5.7) was used for bidirectional univariable two-sample MR analysis between autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataract. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) methods were applied to evaluate the causality between autoimmune, allergic disease-related IVs and senile cataract risk, as the IVW approach is most effective in terms of statistical power when all IVs were valid and there is no horizontal pleiotropy (37). Cochrane's Q test was applied to test whether heterogeneity existed, and if so, an IVW random-effects model was used, otherwise an IVW fixed-effects model was used. The effect size is indicated by the odds ratio (OR) along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). However, even if only one genetic variation is invalid, the IVW method may provide biased estimates. In order to solve the robustness, two other methods are carried out, including weighted median (WM) method and MR-Egger test. WM gives a reliable estimate assuming that no less than 50% of the IVs are valid (35). The results of MR Egger remain valid when SNPs with pleiotropy were more than 50% (38).

Sensitivity analysis

If genetic variants have horizontal pleiotropy, our IVW results will be invalidated. Intercept terms obtained from the MR-Egger regression were used to evaluate imbalanced pleiotropic effects (39). The MR-Egger estimate would be equal to the IVW estimate if the intercept term was zero and the test p-value is greater than 0.05. The MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) method (R package “MR-PRESSO” v1.0) can also detect the outliers that may possess the characteristic of horizontal pleiotropy and provide corrected estimates after removing outliers (40). Cochrane's Q test was used to test heterogeneity (41). If heterogeneity exists, we will use IVW random-effects model to calculate the main results. Leave-one-out analysis is conducted to assess the sensitivity of results to individual variants by sequentially excluding one SNP at a time to estimate whether results are biased or driven by individual SNPs (42). In order to reduce false positive rate in batch analysis, we use Bonferroni method for multiple testing. The threshold for statistical significance was defined as a p-value <5×10-3 (p =0.05 / (ten exposures × one outcome) adjusted for ten exposures and one outcome using the Bonferroni method. A p-value ranging from 0.005 to 0.05 was deemed to indicate suggestive significance.

Results

Selection of IVs associated with autoimmune diseases

In this study, we reported our MR analysis according to STROBE-MR (Strengthening the Reporting of Mendelian Randomization Studies) guidelines to improve the clarity, transparency and reproducibility of the study (Supplementary Table S1).

The number of SNPs ranged from 7 to 117, after quality control steps by LD effects and palindromic. The F-statistic of SNPs ranges from 29.4 to 2815.2, indicating that each SNP revealed adequate validity. The detailed information for each SNP and its R2 and F-statistic value were shown in Supplementary Table S2.

MR analysis

IVW analysis showed that T1D (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.05-1.08; p = 2.24×10-12), RA (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.02-1.08; p = 1.83×10-4), hypothyroidism (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.42-4.06; p = 1.12×10-3), SLE (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.03; p = 2.27×10-3), asthma (OR=1.07; 95% CI = 1.03-1.12; p = 1.2×10-3) and AR (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.02-1.11; p = 2.15×10-3) were causally associated with a significantly increased risk of senile cataract in European populations. CeD (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.08; P = 0.0437) and AD (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.01-1.10; P = 0.0426) exhibits a suggestive connection with senile cataract after Bonferroni correction. There was insufficient evidence to suggest that genetically predicted MS (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98-1.04; P = 0.45) and psoriasis (OR = 0.18; 95% CI =0.03-1.1; P =0.443) were associated with senile cataracts. These associations are consistent across WM and MR Egger methods, with similar causal estimates in direction and magnitude (Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Mendelian randomization estimates from instrument variants for autoimmune and allergic diseases on risk of senile cataract.

No genetic predisposition to any of the 10 diseases was associated with senile cataract in the inverse analysis with IVs to senile cataract as exposure and the 10 diseases as outcomes (Figure 3).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Mendelian randomization estimates from instrument variants for senile cataract on risk of autoimmune and allergic diseases.

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analyses were performed to check the reliability of the IVW results. The effect of pleiotropy of exposures may be negligible given the intercept value, as no evidence of directional pleiotropy was found in the MR-Egger regression analysis (p>0.05) (Table 2). Cochrane's Q test showed that there was heterogeneity in MR analysis results between RA, hypothyroidism, SLE, psoriasis, asthma, AR with senile cataract (p<0.05) (Table 2). When the number of IVs is large, the existence of heterogeneity is unavoidable. Since we used random effects IVW as the primary analysis method, heterogeneity is acceptable and does not affect the estimation of causality (43). The MR-PRESSO test suggested that there were horizontal pleiotropic outliers for RA, hypothyroidism, MS, psoriasis and AR. The outliers-corrected results were shown in Figure 2. The results show that removing outliers did not affect the causal relationships implied by the main IVW results. Leave-one-out analysis results show that all SNPs are evenly distributed on the side of 0. It seems that no SNPs can strongly promote the overall effect of each exposure on senile cataract. The visualized scatter plots and Leave-one-out plots are shown in Figures 4, 5.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 The results of sensitivity analysis.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Scatter plots show the MR effect of each exposure on senile cataract in different MR methods. (A) Type 1 diabetes on senile cataract. (B) Rheumatoid arthritis on senile cataract. (C) Hypothyroidism on senile cataract. (D) Systemic lupus erythematosus on senile cataract. (E) Celiac disease on senile cataract. (F) Asthma on senile cataract. (G) Allergic rhinitis on senile cataract. (H) Allergic dermatitis on senile cataract.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Leave-one-out plots of the causal relationships between autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataract. (A) Type 1 diabetes on senile cataract. (B) Rheumatoid arthritis on senile cataract. (C) Hypothyroidism on senile cataract. (D) Systemic lupus erythematosus on senile cataract. (E) Celiac disease on senile cataract. (F) Asthma on senile cataract. (G) Allergic rhinitis on senile cataract. (H) Allergic dermatitis on senile cataract.

Discussion

In our study, a comprehensive bidirectional two-sample MR study was performed to investigate the causal associations between liabilities to ten diseases and the risk of senile cataract. MR analysis suggested a significant causal relationship between T1D, RA, hypothyroidism, SLE, asthma, AR and senile cataract. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the genetic causal links between autoimmune, allergic disease and senile cataract, making a significant contribution to understanding of the mechanism underlying senile cataract.

As a relatively common autoimmune disease, T1D is charactered by a complete lack of insulin due to the destruction of pancreatic beta cells, and insulin therapy must be given (44). Wen-Li Lu et al. reported that T1D patients had a higher risk of cataract compared to age- and sex-matched general population using cohort methodology in Taiwan (n=3,622) (13). Potential pathophysiological mechanisms may involve the aldose reductase pathway, oxidative stress, osmotic damage and autoimmunity (45). Papadimitriou et al. proposed an autoimmune hypothesis for acute bilateral cataract in T1D (24). Cataract formation typically occurs within weeks or months of the initiation of insulin therapy, coinciding with the time when insulin autoantibody became positive and the immunoreactivity of insulin receptors in the lens decreases. Further studies are necessary for clarification of these points and possibly for histological evidence of autoimmune processes (24). RA is a common autoimmune disease associated with hyperplasia of the joint tissues and the inflammation of the synovium, which can eventually lead to several serious systemic diseases, including pulmonary, cardiovascular, skeletal and psychological diseases (46). Eye diseases such as dry eye, glaucoma are common complications of RA, with a prevalence rate of about 18% (47). No related reports about RA increasing susceptibility to senile cataract directly were retrieved in PubMed database. However, in the treatment of RA, glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used. Posterior subcapsular cataract are known as side effects of long-term use of GCs (48), but it is still inconclusive whether the risk of cataract will increase during the treatment of RA with GCs (49). Our MR analysis provided genetic evidence that the onset of RA may increase the genetic susceptibility to cataract (OR=1.05). Primary hypothyroidism is defined by a high thyrotropin concentration along with low thyroid hormone concentrations or concentrations within the reference range. Hypothyroidism is usually an autoimmune disease in adults, which primarily affects middle-aged and elderly females (50). Limin Wei et al. published a case report that an East Asian 19-year-old male with Klinefelter Syndrome presenting cleft palate, hypothyroidism, cataract, and diabetes (51). This patient did not have congenital cataract because they were not diagnosed in infancy. Therefore, it is inferred that the formation of cataract in this patient may be related to hypothyroidism or diabetes, and there may be a potential genetic relationship between these diseases (51). Our results of MR analysis further verified this conjecture. SLE is a long-lasting autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs. It occurs when there is a failure in the regulation and tolerance of the immune system, affecting both the innate and adaptive immune responses (52). Cataract is the most prevalent ocular impairment in SLE. According to Alderaan et al., cataract development among patients with SLE is multifactorial and associated with the cumulative prednisone dose equivalent, systolic blood pressure and disease activity (12). Celiac disease, also known as gluten intolerance, is a condition that affects the small intestine and is characterized by an immune-mediated enteropathy. Ocular disease associated with celiac disease can sometimes be the first sign of the condition (53). Mollazadegan et al. conducted an European population-based cohort study (n=28756) and identified a moderate increase in the risk of cataract development among individuals diagnosed with biopsy-verified CeD (11). The cause of the condition has not been fully established, but research suggests that it may be related to a lack of absorption of vitamins and trace elements, dehydration, autoimmune factors and oxidative stress (11). Above findings supported the results obtained from our MR analyses, indicating that there is a positive association between genetically proxied autoimmune diseases and the risk of senile cataract.

Oxidative stress is the result of the imbalance between oxidant production and antioxidant defense mechanism. Reaction intermediates (free radicals and peroxides) that cannot be eliminated in time can have toxic effects on cellular components such as DNA, proteins, and lipids (54). The inflammatory response is associated with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), which is a shared characteristic among different autoimmune diseases, including RA, hypothyroidism, T1D, SLE, and others (55, 56). Lipid peroxidation caused by increased free radicals due to increased oxidative pressure of the lens or decreased ability to remove ROS is also an important pathological mechanism for cataract formation. Oxidative stress and autoimmunity-induced DNA damage, telomerase inhibition, and significant telomere shortening also accelerate aging (57, 58). Therefore, it can be inferred that the oxidative stress state of patients with autoimmune diseases may increase their susceptibility to senile cataract. A large amount of evidence suggests that autophagy deficiency is related to the development of autoimmunity. Meanwhile, the destruction of autophagy of lens cells can also lead to the loss of anti-stress ability and inhibit differentiation, and eventually lead to the formation of cataract (59, 60). Ferroptosis is a newly discovered type of iron-dependent programmed cell death characterized by excessive iron accumulation, elevated lipid peroxides, reactive oxygen species, reduced glutathione and glutathione peroxidase levels. A large and emerging literature on ferroptosis demonstrates the critical role of these pathological processes in autoimmune and ocular diseases (61). In addition, improper degradation of DNA during programmed death may also lead to autoimmune diseases and cataract (62).

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder involving a large number of cells and cellular elements in the respiratory system (63). Li et al. found that cataracts had a positive correlation with asthma after adjusting for confounding factors by analyzing nationally representative samples from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) (16). Asthma may be closely related to cataracts through the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway. In addition, allergy-induced inflammation or immune dysregulation is also one of the potential mechanisms leading to cataract formation (26). AR is a chronic inflammatory disease of the upper respiratory tract characterized by sneezing, itching, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea (64). A Korean population-based survey reported that people with asthma and AR were more likely to develop senile cataracts but not with AD (17). Intranasal corticosteroids, a well-established and effective treatment for AR, does not appear to increase the risk of cataract in patients (65). The association between allergic diseases and cataracts may be attributed to multiple mechanisms, such as having similar risk factors, hypertension, hyperglycemia, etc. Other factors including inflammation and oxidative stress may also increase susceptibility to cataract (66). Our results showed that there is a suggestive genetic association between AD and senile cataract (p=0.0426). Therefore, as for whether AD increases the risk of senile cataract, based on our MR analysis and previous research results, we cannot determine the causal relationship between them, and further RCT is needed (17, 67).

A cause-and-effect relationship between the risk of senile cataract and MS, psoriasis could not be established in our study. Classified as an organ-specific, T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease, MS is the most common disabling disease in young adults that is not caused by physical trauma (68). A European population-based cohort study (n = 39,444) showing MS patients under the age of 50, especially young men, are at higher risk of developing cataract, compared with healthy controls (14). This result is contrary to the results of our MR analysis that there is no causal relationship between MS and the onset of cataract. Compared to observational studies, our MR study results are more compelling due to its ability to reduce confounding factors and reverse-causal association bias to some extent. Nonetheless, more advanced RCTs should be designed to confirm the causal association between the two diseases. Psoriasis, a polygenic disease characterized by erythematous plaques with silvery scales, is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune skin disorder affecting 1-3% of the world's population (69). Fuying Chen and colleagues have identified a new condition called the CAOP syndrome, which involves cataracts, alopecia, oral mucosal disorders and psoriasis-like symptoms (70). Contrary to our results, a population-based cohort by Chun-Yu Cheng has been observed a positive correlation between psoriasis and cataract. The common pathogenesis of cataract and psoriasis may be related to interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, intracellular adhesion molecule- 1, oxidative stress and so on (15). These differences in causality may be due to potential confounding factors, such as steroid hormone use and ultraviolet radiation, because observational studies are difficult to escape the influence of confounding factors. Therefore, there is likely no causal relationship between psoriasis and senile cataract based on MR analysis.

Senile cataract, as a reversible blinding eye disease with a high incidence rate, has caused great damage to labor productivity and brought a heavy economic burden around the world, especially in developing countries with in adequate surgical facilities. Understanding which factors increase the risk of cataracts can help identify high-risk individuals. Through the findings of this paper, people with autoimmune diseases should have regular anterior segment examinations through slit lamp microscopy while actively treating the primary disease, which will help ophthalmologists formulate preventive strategies in real time or select the most appropriate time for surgical treatment.

The main strength of our study is that we conducted an MR analysis and explored the genetic causal relationship between autoimmune, allergic diseases and the risk of senile cataract for the first time. Furthermore, various techniques were employed to perform sensitivity analysis, identifying outliers and correcting any potential pleiotropy and heterogeneity. With the increasing availability of a large amount of genetic data, the extension of GWAS may achieve early prediction of senile cataract and make it possible to achieve genetic-based treatment. The current study also has several limitations. Firstly, we used conventional methods that outcomes data were obtained from the FinnGen database and exposures data were obtained from other GWASs study on European ancestry in IEU Open GWAS database to reduce sample overlap. However, it is difficult to determine whether overlapping subjects were included in our MR analysis. Secondly, there is a possibility that a complete identification of all SNPs linked to these diseases was not achieved. By utilizing a restricted number of SNPs to establish the causal associations, it is possible that the statistical power of certain analyses may have been diminished. Thirdly, there may be potential confounding factors, such as the use of steroid hormone mediating the causality of autoimmune diseases on cataract, but due to the limitations of GWAS, we are not yet able to perform multivariate MR and mediation analysis. Last but not least, the data related to autoimmune, allergic diseases and senile cataracts were mostly from European ancestry. The results of our study should not be directly generalized to other ethnic groups.

Conclusion

In summary, our current findings provide strong genetic evidence in support of the causal relationship among type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, hypothyroidism, systemic lupus erythematosus, asthma, allergic rhinitis and senile cataract in a European population. Our study confirms previous observational studies, suggesting that autoimmune and allergy processes may be risk factors of senile cataract. The results of this study suggest that patients with autoimmune or allergy diseases should pay attention to the prevention and treatment of senile cataract and further studies are needed to clarify the potential role of autoimmune and allergy in the pathophysiology of senile cataract.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

All analyses were based on publicly shared databases and no additional ethical approvals were required.

Author contributions

WY: Writing – original draft, Software, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. XL: Writing – original draft, Visualization. GW: Writing – original draft, Resources. BQ: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. FZ: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education in 2021 (No. LJKZ0773).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1325868/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Hashemi H, Pakzad R, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Pakbin M, Ramin S, et al. Global and regional prevalence of age-related cataract: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye (Lond). (2020) 34:1357–70. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0806-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. He M, Wang W and Huang W. Variations and trends in health burden of visual impairment due to cataract: A global analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2017) 58:4299–306. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Mitchell P, Cumming RG, Attebo K, Panchapakesan J. Prevalence of cataract in Australia: the Blue Mountains eye study. Ophthalmology. (1997) 104:581–8. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30266-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yu X, Lyu D, Dong X, He J and Yao K. Hypertension and risk of cataract: a meta-analysis. PloS One. (2014) 9:e114012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ye J, He J, Wang C, Wu H, Shi X, Zhang H, et al. Smoking and risk of age-related cataract: a meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2012) 53:3885–95. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9820

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Chua SYL, Luben RN, Hayat S, Broadway DC, Khaw KT, Warwick A, et al. Alcohol consumption and incident cataract surgery in two large UK cohorts. Ophthalmology. (2021) 128:837–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Pek A, Szabo D, Sandor GL, Toth G, Papp A, Nagy ZZ, et al. Relationship between diabetes mellitus and cataract in Hungary. Int J Ophthalmol. (2020) 13:788–93. doi: 10.18240/ijo

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jacobson DL, Gange SJ, Rose NR and Graham NM. Epidemiology and estimated population burden of selected autoimmune diseases in the United States. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. (1997) 84:223–43. doi: 10.1006/clin.1997.4412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wang L, Wang FS and Gershwin ME. Human autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive update. J Intern Med. (2015) 278:369–95. doi: 10.1111/joim.12395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Nwaru BI, Virtanen SM. Allergenic food introduction and childhood risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. JAMA. (2017) 317:86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mollazadegan K, Kugelberg M, Lindblad BE, Ludvigsson JF. Increased risk of cataract among 28,000 patients with celiac disease. Am J Epidemiol. (2011) 174:195–202. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Alderaan K, Sekicki V, Magder LS and Petri M. Risk factors for cataracts in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Rheumatol Int. (2015) 35:701–8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3129-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lu WL, Shen PC, Lee CH, Su YT and Chen LM. High risk of early cataracts in young type 1 diabetes group: A nationwide cohort study. Int J Endocrinol. (2020) 2020:8160256. doi: 10.1155/2020/8160256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bazelier MT, Mueller-Schotte S, Leufkens HG, Uitdehaag BM, van Staa T, de Vries F. Risk of cataract and glaucoma in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. (2012) 18:628–38. doi: 10.1177/1352458511426737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cheng CY. Risk of incident cataract in patients with psoriasis: A population-based cohort study. J Dermatol. (2022) 49:359–67. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Li W, Wang B. Cross-sectional study of the association between asthma and cataract among 40 years and older in the USA. BMC Ophthalmol. (2022) 22:340. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02564-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lee YB, Lee JH, Kang MJ, Choi JY, Kim JW, Yu DS, et al. Association between allergic diseases and ophthalmologic diseases, including cataracts and glaucoma, using the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-2012: A STROBE-compliant article. J Dermatol. (2018) 45:463–7. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, Yarmolinsky J, Davies NM, Swanson SA, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement. JAMA. (2021) 326:1614–21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Smith GD, Ebrahim S. 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. (2003) 32:1–22. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Zheng J, Baird D, Borges MC, Bowden J, Hemani G, Haycock P, et al. Recent developments in mendelian randomization studies. Curr Epidemiol Rep. (2017) 4:330–45. doi: 10.1007/s40471-017-0128-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mokry LE, Ahmad O, Forgetta V, Thanassoulis G, Richards JB. Mendelian randomisation applied to drug development in cardiovascular disease: a review. J Med Genet. (2015) 52:71–9. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B and Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet. (2017) 390:600–12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30544-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Vinson JA. Oxidative stress in cataracts. Pathophysiology. (2006) 13:151–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2006.05.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Papadimitriou DT, Bothou C, Skarmoutsos F, Alexandrides TK, Papaevangelou V, Papadimitriou A. The autoimmune hypothesis for acute bilateral cataract in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. (2016) 42:386–7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2016.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ranjan M, Nayak S, Kosuri T and Rao BS. Immunochemical detection of glycated lens crystallins and their circulating autoantibodies in human serum during aging. Mol Vis. (2008) 14:2056–66.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Zhao Y, Li X, Xu Z, Hao L, Zhang Y and Liu Z. PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway: the intersection of allergic asthma and cataract. Pharmazie. (2019) 74:598–600. doi: 10.1691/ph.2019.9080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sakaue S, Kanai M, Tanigawa Y, Karjalainen J, Kurki M, Koshiba S, et al. A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes. Nat Genet. (2021) 53:1415–24. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00931-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Eyre S, Bowes J, Diogo D, Lee A, Barton A, Martin P, et al. High-density genetic mapping identifies new susceptibility loci for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet. (2012) 44:1336–40. doi: 10.1038/ng.2462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dubois PC, Trynka G, Franke L, Hunt KA, Romanos J, Curtotti A, et al. Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nat Genet. (2010) 42:295–302. doi: 10.1038/ng.543

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bentham J, Morris DL, Graham DSC, Pinder CL, Tombleson P, Behrens TW, et al. Genetic association analyses implicate aberrant regulation of innate and adaptive immunity genes in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. (2015) 47:1457–64. doi: 10.1038/ng.3434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. The International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium & The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature. (2011) 476:214–9. doi: 10.1038/nature10251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Valette K, Li Z, Bon-Baret V, Chignon A, Berube JC, Eslami A, et al. Prioritization of candidate causal genes for asthma in susceptibility loci derived from UK Biobank. Commun Biol. (2021) 4:700. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02227-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mbatchou J, Barnard L, Backman J, Marcketta A, Kosmicki JA, Ziyatdinov A, et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat Genet. (2021) 53:1097–103. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00870-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sliz E, Huilaja L, Pasanen A, Laisk T, Reimann E, Magi R, et al. Uniting biobank resources reveals novel genetic pathways modulating susceptibility for atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2022) 149:1105–12 e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC and Burgess S. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. (2016) 40:304–14. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipila TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. (2023) 613:508–18. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. (2013) 37:658–65. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21758

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. (2015) 44:512–25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zhu Z, Zhang F, Hu H, Bakshi A, Robinson MR, Powell JE, et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat Genet. (2016) 48:481–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.3538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B and Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. (2018) 50:693–8. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Bowden J, Del Greco MF, Minelli C, Davey Smith G, Sheehan N and Thompson J. A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat Med. (2017) 36:1783–802. doi: 10.1002/sim.7221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Emdin CA, Khera AV and Kathiresan S. Mendelian randomization. JAMA. (2017) 318:1925–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM, Dudbridge F, Gill D, Glymour MM, et al. Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023. Wellcome Open Res. (2019) 4:186. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Katsarou A, Gudbjornsdottir S, Rawshani A, Dabelea D, Bonifacio E, Anderson BJ, et al. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17016. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Obrosova IG, Chung SS and Kador PF. Diabetic cataracts: mechanisms and management. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2010) 26:172–80. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. (2011) 365:2205–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Turk MA, Hayworth JL, Nevskaya T and Pope JE. Ocular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue disease, and vasculitis: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. (2021) 48:25–34. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Black RL, Oglesby RB, Von Sallmann L and Bunim JJ. Posterior subcapsular cataracts induced by corticosteroids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA. (1960) 174:166–71. doi: 10.1001/jama.1960.63030020005014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Black RJ, Hill CL, Lester S and Dixon WG. The association between systemic glucocorticoid use and the risk of cataract and glaucoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. (2016) 11:e0166468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Iglesias P, Bajo MA, Selgas R and Diez JJ. Thyroid dysfunction and kidney disease: An update. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. (2017) 18:131–44. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9395-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wei L, Liu Y, Sun S, Tang Y, Chen S and Song G. Case report of 49,XXXXY syndrome with cleft palate, diabetes, hypothyroidism, and cataracts. Med (Baltimore). (2019) 98:e17342. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017342

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Tsokos GC, Lo MS, Costa Reis P, Sullivan KE. New insights into the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2016) 12:716–30. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Fousekis FS, Katsanos A, Katsanos KH, Christodoulou DK. Ocular manifestations in celiac disease: an overview. Int Ophthalmol. (2020) 40:1049–54. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01254-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Ramani S, Pathak A, Dalal V, Paul A and Biswas S. Oxidative stress in autoimmune diseases: an under dealt Malice. Curr Protein Pept Sci. (2020) 21:611–21. doi: 10.2174/1389203721666200214111816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Ruggeri RM, Campenn IA, Giuffrida G, Casciaro M, Barbalace MC, Hrelia S, et al. Oxidative stress as a key feature of autoimmune thyroiditis: an update. Minerva Endocrinol. (2020) 45:326–44. doi: 10.23736/S0391-1977.20.03268-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Smallwood MJ, Nissim A, Knight AR, Whiteman M, Haigh R and Winyard PG. Oxidative stress in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Free Radic Biol Med. (2018) 125:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Babizhayev MA, Yegorov YE. Telomere attrition in lens epithelial cells - a target for N-acetylcarnosine therapy. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). (2010) 15:934–56. doi: 10.2741/3655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. The immunology of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Immunol. (2021) 22:10–8. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00816-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Keller CW, Adamopoulos IE, Lunemann JD. Autophagy pathways in autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun. (2023) 136:103030. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Chai P, Ni H, Zhang H and Fan X. The evolving functions of autophagy in ocular health: A double-edged sword. Int J Biol Sci. (2016) 12:1332–40. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.16245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Liu K, Li H, Wang F and Su Y. Ferroptosis: mechanisms and advances in ocular diseases. Mol Cell Biochem. (2023) 478:2081–95. doi: 10.1007/s11010-022-04644-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Nagata S. DNA degradation in development and programmed cell death. Annu Rev Immunol. (2005) 23:853–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Asher MI, Montefort S, Bjorksten B, Lai CK, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, et al. Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet. (2006) 368:733–43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69283-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Skoner DP. Allergic rhinitis: definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, detection, and diagnosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2001) 108:S2–8. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.115569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Valenzuela CV, Liu JC, Vila PM, Simon L, Doering M and Lieu JEC. Intranasal corticosteroids do not lead to ocular changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. (2019) 129:6–12. doi: 10.1002/lary.27209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Paik JS, Han K, Nam G, Park SK, Hwang HS, Chun YH, et al. Increased risk of cataract surgery in patients with allergic disease: a population based cohort study. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:21258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25589-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Rim TH, Kim DW, Kim SE and Kim SS. Factors associated with cataract in korea: A community health survey 2008-2012. Yonsei Med J. (2015) 56:1663–70. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis - a review. Eur J Neurol. (2019) 26:27–40. doi: 10.1111/ene.13819

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Chandran NS, Greaves M, Gao F, Lim L and Cheng BC. Psoriasis and the eye: prevalence of eye disease in Singaporean Asian patients with psoriasis. J Dermatol. (2007) 34:805–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00390.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Chen F, Ni C, Wang X, Cheng R, Pan C, Wang Y, et al. S1P defects cause a new entity of cataract, alopecia, oral mucosal disorder, and psoriasis-like syndrome. EMBO Mol Med. (2022) 14:e14904. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, allergy, Mendelian randomization, senile cataract, GWAS - genome-wide association study

Citation: Yuan W, Li X, Wang G, Qu B and Zhao F (2024) Association of autoimmune and allergic diseases with senile cataract: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front. Immunol. 15:1325868. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1325868

Received: 22 October 2023; Accepted: 19 February 2024;
Published: 22 March 2024.

Edited by:

Kai Jin, Zhejiang University, China

Reviewed by:

Xin Ye, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, China
Yao Tan, Jinan University, China

Copyright © 2024 Yuan, Li, Wang, Qu and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fangkun Zhao, fkzhao@cmu.edu.cn; Bo Qu, qubo@cmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.