Immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated myocarditis: a systematic analysis of case reports

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy can be complicated by their potential cardiovascular toxicities, including myocarditis. Nowadays, no prospective trials have focused on ICI-associated myocarditis optimized management. Available evidence only come from case reports or series. A systematic case reports analysis was conducted to collect and evaluate emerging evidence of ICI-associated myocarditis to provide more information to clinicians.

Methods: We performed a literature search for eligible case reports or series published between January 2018 and May 2023 using the PubMed database. Then, we extracted interesting information via table form. Finally, this study included 113 publications on 106 patients with ICI-associated myocarditis.

Results: Myocarditis was found to be a highly life-threatening disease, with 53.8% of cases. Over half of cases were life-threatening (G4, 23.6%) or severe (G3, 35.8%) and required glucocorticoids. Higher rates of improvement were associated with the best response to ICI for complete response/partial response (72.7% vs. 53.9%), glucocorticoid administration (30% vs. 22%), and discontinuation of ICI (58.8% vs. 32.1%). Consequently, ICI-associated G3–G4 myocarditis should be treated with a combination of discontinuation of ICIs, high-dose glucocorticoids, other drugs, chemical drugs, plasma exchange, and life support. For moderate G1 or G2 cases, discontinuation of ICIs and regular-dose glucocorticoids should be considered.

Conclusion: Once full recovery or improvement was achieved; glucocorticoids can be administered at low doses or stopped. Notably, re-challenge with ICIs appears feasible after resolution or meaningful improvement of myocarditis.

Introduction

Over the past few decades, immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and has become the fourth antitumor modality after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (1). As the frontier of cancer immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to considerable clinical breakthroughs and extended survival rates across in a wide range of tumor types (2). ICIs are key negative regulators of antitumor immunity monoclonal antibodies, which can block immune checkpoint proteins including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) (3). Approximately 50% of patients with cancer are eligible for ICI therapy, and a larger number of patients achieve long-term clinical responses (4). As of May 2023, 11 ICIs have been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (Table 1). The increasing number of annual clinical trials reflects the prominence of ICIs in cancer treatment (5).

TABLE 1

Table 1 FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors by 2023.

Given that ICIs can inhibit T cells and activate immune responses, they can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in any organ (6). Although any organ system can be implicated by ICI-associated irAEs, ICI-associated myocarditis has aroused as a rare and often fatal adverse event (7). Other cardiovascular toxicities include vasculitis, pericarditis, and arrhythmias (8). Timely diagnosis and proper treatment of cardiovascular irAEs, especially ICI-associated myocarditis, are clinically challenging (9). Although uncommon (<1% of patients with cancer are treated with ICIs) (10, 11), the morbidity of ICI-associated myocarditis is probably underestimated with inconsistent screening criteria and nonspecific symptoms. In clinical practice, cardiovascular irAEs may manifest occasionally; this view may attribute to the poor understanding of the disease and the failure to recognize early symptoms (12). However, ICI-associated myocarditis has a high death rate, ranging from approximately 20% to 50%, according to retrospective studies (11, 13). Inconsistent morbidity and mortality of ICI-associated myocarditis reflect an unmet clinical need; therefore, understanding the precise mechanisms of pathogenesis and having more clinical information of ICI-associated myocarditis are crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment.

Recently, some authoritative recommendations have been specifically established for the diagnosis and treatment of ICI-associated myocarditis, such as 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology (14), Myocarditis in the Setting of Cancer Therapeutics (15). Besides, management of ICI-associated myocarditis can be found in the Guidelines of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (16). However, no prospective trials have focused on ICI-associated myocarditis’ optimized management, and the available evidence was case reports or series. With the high mortality of ICI-associated myocarditis, a timely diagnosis and management is necessary to decrease the death rate and increase the application scope of ICIs in cancer patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic analysis of case reports for the purpose of collecting and evaluating emerging evidence of ICI-associated myocarditis to provide more information to clinicians.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

We first performed a literature search for eligible case reports or series published between January 2018 and May 2023 using the PubMed database. Then, we carried out a further search using the following combination of terms: (‘checkpoint inhibitors’ OR ‘checkpoint inhibition’ OR ‘checkpoint blockade’ OR ‘PD1’ OR ‘PDL1’ OR ‘CTLA4’ OR ‘sintilimab’ OR ‘pembrolizumab’ OR ‘camrelizumab’ OR ‘nivolumab’ OR ‘tremelimumab’ OR ‘ipilimumab’ OR ‘atezolizumab’) AND (‘carditis’ OR ‘myocarditides’ OR ‘myocarditis’ OR ‘cardiac adverse event’ OR ‘cardiac side-effect’ OR ‘cardiac toxicity’ OR ‘cardiac complication’ OR ‘cardiac irAE’ OR ‘Heart Failure’). A detailed flowchart of the study is shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 PRISMA Participant Flow Diagram. Flow diagram depicts the: 1) methods and results for our strategies; and 2) results of record screening and inclusion in the systematic review of case reports and series.

Eligibility criteria

Case reports were selected by preliminarily assessment of titles and abstracts. For searching additional qualifying papers, the reference lists of the included literature were curated manually. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies on ICI-associated myocarditis; (2) full-text available; (3) published papers; and (4) case reports or case series. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) articles, reviews, commentaries, and meta-analyses; (2) articles not written in English; (3) studies on cancer agents other than ICIs; and (4) no myocarditis studies.

Study selection and quality assessment

All studies were independently evaluated through the Rayyan platform by screening titles and abstracts with three individuals in parallel (17). The authors assessed the studies based on the aforementioned eligibility criteria and any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The quality assessment of this article of case reports was conducted by previous study. Sufficient quality was determined if five of the eight evaluation criteria were met and all authors agreed that the study could be included.

Data extraction

For the included studies, three authors manually retrieved and extracted the related data. Details were extracted from each case report as follows: reference information (reference tittle, first author, year); basic patient information (sex, age, past medical history, cancer type, and cancer stage); ICI treatment information (ICI treatment type, therapy line, and ICI drug name); ICI-associated myocarditis information (time to onset, myocarditis diagnosis and staging, myocarditis symptoms, best response to ICI, and prognosis); and other relevant information (ICI discontinuation type, ICI-associated myocarditis treatment strategies, treatment outcome, ICI re-challenge, ICI-associated myocarditis recurrence, and associated irAEs). All data were extracted and compiled into an online Excel file with accessible permissions to all the authors.

The data extracted from each article are summarized and presented in Supplementary Material. The cases will be described narratively, combine and highlight the similarities between them, if possible, draw conclusions. Considering the abstractibility of this article and the small cases loads, we used descriptive statistics to exhibit the demographic and clinical characteristics of these cases. Continuous variables were reported by means, and dichotomous variables were characterized by frequencies and percentages.

Results

The search strategy identified 1181 records, all of which were screened based on titles and abstracts. Ultimately, 98 publications were selected, including 116 cases of ICI-associated myocarditis. A descriptive summary of these 106 cases is presented in Supplementary Material.

Table 2 provides a summary of the main characteristics of patients. The median time to onset of myocarditis was 22.5 days (IQR 16–52) following the initiation of ICI treatment. However, some cases of early toxicity and late toxicity are noted within the first week (18, 19) and after ≥1 year of ICI treatment (20), respectively.

TABLE 2

Table 2 Characteristics of patients with myocarditis under ICI treatment.

Of the 116 included patients, the majority were male (66.4%) and received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy (75.0%). The three most common primary tumors were lung cancer (26.7%), melanoma (19.0%), and esophageal/gastric cancer (6.9%). In addition, ICIs are usually used as first/second-line (75.0%) treatment. Following ICI treatment, most patients exhibited stable disease (SD, 37.1%) or progressive disease (PD, 34.5%). ICI-associated myocarditis was severe or life-threatening (G3 or G4) in most cases (60.4%), with only a small proportion of patients (6.0%) experiencing grade 1 myocarditis. Given that myocarditis is a fatal adverse event, the mortality rate was 47.4% among 116 cases. Only 26 cases of recovery (22.4%) and 35 cases of improvement (30.2%) related to this condition were reported. We also summarized the main characteristics of 11 Cases of ICI-associated myocarditis in cancer patients treated and rechallenge with ICIs (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3 11 Cases of ICI-associated myocarditis in cancer patients treated and rechallenge with ICIs.

Single glucocorticoid agents were administered to 43.1% of the patients, whereas most patients (56.9%) received a combination of glucocorticoids and other therapies. Methylprednisolone was the most frequently administered glucocorticoid, accounting for 43.1% of the cases. The most common methylprednisolone schedule was 1–2 mg/kg/day. Additionally, combination strategies involving glucocorticoids with other therapeutic agents, such as chemical drugs (10.3%), biologics (2.6%), life support (5.2%), immunoglobulins (8.6%), or plasma exchange (5.2%), have also been applied to treat patients with myocarditis of different severities. At the onset of myocarditis, 12 patients (10.3%) had already completed all ICI treatments, and only 14 (12.1%) continued ICIs, whereas 59 (50.9%) discontinued ICIs temporarily (11 patients) or permanently (48 patients). After re-challenge with ICIs, only one of the 11 patients experienced myocarditis recurrence.

Patients with complete response/partial response (CR/PR) usually exhibited a higher improvement rate (83.3%) than patients with SD/PD (55.4%). Of the 116 cases included, myocarditis development was followed by continuation of ICIs in 14 (continued after evaluation) and 11 (temporarily discontinued, then restarted) cases, corresponding to an oncologic efficacy of CR (4), PD (8), PR (2), SD (7), NA (4), and a favorable outcome of 52% (13/25) comparable to the outcome of overall ICI treatment of healing and improvement (52.6%). The occurrence of myocarditis did not affect the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. In clinical practice, physicians need to carefully and adequately assess the benefit-risk ratio of patients before initiating ICI therapy and after myocarditis before deciding whether to rechallenge ICI. Patients with myocarditis treated with glucocorticoids had a better improvement rate (62.0%) than those who did not receive hormones. Notably, compared with ≤G3 myocarditis patients, G4 patients have higher improvement rate at 59.3%, although these associations were not statistically significant (Table 4).

TABLE 4

Table 4 Association between characteristics of patients and myocarditis outcome.

Discussion

The largest number of published case reports on myocarditis in patients with cancer treated with ICIs were included and analyzed in this article. We presented the main characteristics of the 106 patients and found associations between some patient characteristics and myocarditis outcomes.

Based on our results, male sex, lung cancer, melanoma, and treatment with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-1 in combination with CTLA-4 may increase the risk of ICI-associated myocarditis. Previous studies have suggested that the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 is one of the strongest risk factors for ICI-associated myocarditis. The pharmacovigilance data indicated that a 4.74-fold higher risk of myocarditis than nivolumab alone (32). Our research showed that patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies may exhibit a higher grade of myocarditis, with 46% incidence of grade 4 myocarditis. Another large retrospective pharmacovigilance study revealed that patients with myocarditis are more often male (66%), having melanoma (40.7%) or lung cancer (32%), and are treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as a single agent (69%) (12). Consistent with these data, patients included in our article were mostly male patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for melanoma or lung cancer. Genetic variations, including somatic or germline tumors, may also contribute (33). Furthermore, clinical trials involving a large number of patients are required to identify predisposing factors for myocarditis and other ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicities.

The exact incidence of myocarditis in patients with cancer treated with ICIs remains unknown. ICI-based cancer trials in the early time did not prospectively screen for myocarditis (34). Current investigations have reported that the incidence rates range from 0.1% to 1.14% across different series (13, 32). This broad range may be attributed to heterogeneity, such as the different grades of severity of the cases and the diverse distribution of potential risk factors for ICI-associated myocarditis (35). In addition, because of the difficulty of myocarditis diagnosis cases in these trials might have been missed. Overall, the true incidence of ICI-associated myocarditis may be higher, and further prospective trials should focus on this issue.

ICI-associated myocarditis represents a clinically unmet problem because it may be fatal. The mortality rates range from approximately 35.8%, as reported in our analysis, to >50%, as reported in a previous study (13). To date, no international consensus has been reached covering ICI-associated myocarditis screening, surveillance, prevention, and treatment. The diagnosis of myocarditis can be challenging in clinical settings, particularly in patients receiving ICIs. In current clinical practice, ICI-associated myocarditis is often a multipronged diagnosis of exclusion, ruling out other causes of symptomatology (for example, cancer progression and acute coronary syndrome), and includes a comprehensive analysis of cardiac imaging, biomarker tests, and endomyocardial biopsy (36). Based on a multicenter study from American College of Cardiology (13), Mahmood et al. (13) proposed that the traditional diagnostic pathway of is the observation of new-onset cardiovascular symptoms in patients receiving ICI therapy, further laboratory and imaging tests, and medical consultations, ultimately leading to a diagnosis of ICI-associated myocarditis. Another expert guideline from European Society of Cardiology (14) indicated that the initial diagnosis of ICI-associated myocarditis relies on the identification of aberrant cardiovascular symptoms, a recent elevation in troponin levels, the presence of new electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, and urgent cardiovascular imaging to other causes of myocardial injury, such as acute coronary syndrome. In fact, most patients exhibit clinical symptoms suggestive of ICI-associated myocarditis, elevated troponin levels, and/or an abnormal baseline ECG (37). However, increased serum troponin concentrations are difficult to interpret in asymptomatic patients, which highlighted improved predictive biomarkers are needed. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used for further diagnosis (38). In clinical practice, an endomyocardial biopsy has traditionally been regarded as the gold standard for myocarditis diagnosis (39). The histopathological characteristics of ICI-associated myocarditis involve infiltration of T lymphocytes (both CD4+ and CD8+), macrophages, and myocyte death, whereas B lymphocytes are not observed (32). However, as an endomyocardial biopsy is an invasive examination, it poses a psychological burden on patients. In the future, prospective multi-institutional studies are needed to explore effective non-invasive examinations, such as predictive biomarkers and medical imaging, for the screening and surveillance of patients.

The clinical implications of ICI-associated myocarditis vary among studies. Patients with fulminant myocarditis exhibit early symptoms after ICI treatment, including arrhythmias/conduction disturbances, dyspnea, concomitant skeletal myositis, and myasthenia gravis (12). This was consistent with our results which showed that dyspnea was found in 31% of patients. Another study highlighted that the concomitant presence of skeletal myositis and myasthenia gravis following after ICI treatment should increase awareness of myocarditis (40). Our research indicated that 20% of patients with myocarditis also exhibited skeletal myositis or myasthenia gravis. In contrast to fulminant cases, “smoldering” cases of ICI-associated myocarditis have also been documented (35, 41). However, no studies have revealed the long-term consequences of ICI-associated myocarditis. Therefore, given the growing number of cancer survivors receiving ICIs, understanding the long-term cardiovascular effects of ICIs is a future challenge for oncologists and cardiologists.

Treatments for ICI-associated myocarditis have been largely extrapolated from amount of irAEs therapies, including cessation of ICIs, glucocorticoids, chemical drugs, and supportive management (42). For myocarditis, higher initial steroid doses (e.g., intravenous methylprednisolone, 1 g/day) have been suggested (43). In the present review, almost all patients (98.2%) received glucocorticoids and achieved a 15.1% recovery rate and a 35.8% improvement rate, suggesting that glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of ICI-associated myocarditis treatment. Nonetheless, the findings of our analysis revealed that the mortality was substantial (50.8%). In addition to glucocorticoids, various case reports have demonstrated the efficacy of other medications such as tacrolimus (44), mycophenolate mofetil (45), abatacept (46), and alemtuzumab (47). Although these treatments are classified as immunosuppressive modalities, their specific mechanisms of action differ (48). For example, abatacept is a soluble protein composed of the CTLA-4 extracellular domain fused to the Fc region of IgG, which limits the costimulatory signals of T cells (49). Wei et al. explored whether abatacept could ameliorate the disease progression of ICI-associated myocarditis in a mouse model and mitigate its fulminant course in patients (50). Further it is necessary of prospective clinical trials to compare single or combination efficacy with that of other therapies.

Considering steroids as the main treatment for immune myocarditis, we also summarized new immune checkpoint inhibition into the biologic agent category in Table 2, including six case-use reports of infliximab, one case of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), and one case of abatacept. Two studies reported nonsignificant improvement in symptoms related to myocarditis with infliximab (51, 52), while three cases reported a worsening manifestation of symptoms related to myocarditis with infliximab (53–55), and another study reported the use of infliximab but not describing the results (26). One study found the use of ATG was suspended due to poor patient status (56), and another study reported the myocarditis symptoms were improved with the use of Abatacept (57). Although new immune checkpoint inhibitors have been recommended as second-line therapy for immune myocarditis after steroid resistance, and although this study summarized case reports on immune myocarditis in the last five years, there is uncertainty about the efficacy of biologics such as tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists, ATG, and abatacept in actual case reports due to the lack of prospective studies, and this may be related to our limitations of the collected cases.

The guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology for the management of irAEs in patients treated with ICIs (42) recommend the early use of high doses of glucocorticoids (e.g., methylprednisolone 1 g/day) and a combination of mycophenolate, antithymocyte globulin, or infliximab for the treatment of refractory and recurrent myocarditis. Conversely, although some experts have advocated TNF-α antagonists (such as infliximab) for ICI-associated myocarditis, concerns have been raised regarding their application in patients with heart failure (58).

Furthermore, we also compared our results with current known cohorts of ICI-associated myocarditis (11–13, 59) (Table 5). Our results were almost consistent with other four cohorts. Based on the known cohorts, the incidence rate of ICI-associated myocarditis is ranged from 0.39%-1.14%, representing a small entity of ICI-associated adverse events. However, the fatal rate is as high as 39.7%-50%, and our results indicate the fatal rate is 47.4%, indicating the unmet clinical need of ICI-associated myocarditis. Besides, the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 seems to cause higher fatal rate compared with single use of ICIs. Therefore, in clinical practice, physicians need to carefully and adequately assess the benefit-risk ratio of patients before initiating ICI therapy and after myocarditis before deciding whether to rechallenge ICI.

TABLE 5

Table 5 The comparison of this study with current known cohort.

The exact mechanism of the pathogenesis of ICI-associated myocarditis remains unclear, and some concerns should be addressed in future studies (60) (Figure 2). First, we precisely determined the incidence of ICI-associated myocarditis. The potential lethality of cardiotoxicity limits the clinical application of ICIs. Given the apparent low frequency (<1%) of ICI-associated myocarditis, one would not anticipate this possibility, if not for the high death rate (35.8%, as reported in our analysis) associated with this adverse event. The inconsistent morbidity and mortality rates of ICI-associated myocarditis reflect an unmet clinical need; therefore, prospective studies should be performed to address this issue. Second, studies are needed to identify predictive markers and medical imaging technologies for patients with high-risk ICI-associated myocarditis, and an endomyocardial biopsy is always required for the final diagnosis. Third, more multicenter clinical trials necessary for formulating and standardizing diagnostic and therapeutic schemes. Further studies should focus on the relative balance between potentially disturbing the cancer treatment and alleviating cardiotoxicities. The most important issue is understanding the pathogenesis of ICI-associated myocarditis at the molecular and cellular levels. Some questions should be addressed: How do ICIs affect immune-cardiac interrelationships? What cardiac antigens are inciting? Why do self-antigens elicit harmful immune responses? Is cell death a critical process in pathogenesis, which cell death patterns are involved if it was true? Does the predominance of arrhythmias primarily reflect disturbances in the conduction system of the heart, or is it generalized by systematic inflammation? Taking into account the greater complexity of human, studies involving the blood and tissues obtained from patients are critical for understanding these mechanisms.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Summary of the underlying mechanisms of ICI-associated myocarditis. ICI-associated myocarditis is a serious adverse events of patients of cancers received ICI treatment. The possible mechanism of ICI-associated myocarditis may be due to the elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, emergence of auto-antibody, and the T cell recognition of a shared or similar antigen.

Study limitations. The current investigation also had several limitations, primarily attributable to the retrospective nature of case reports: (1) case reports are inherently subjective, which provide a non-random sample, and often do not allow for causal inferences; (2) although multiple databases were search, publication bias was not entirely ruled out, and mild cases could have been under-reported; particularly, only a few G1 myocarditis cases have been reported; (3) some detailed information on risk factors, diagnostics or management of myocarditis could be missing; (4) patients selected for re-challenge of ICIs were probably those in better clinical condition, and in clinical practice, the decision of re-challenge should be considered carefully on a case-by-case basis; (5) the sample size included in this article was limited and relied on the literature of a small collection of case reports which was not allowed for a more comprehensive quantitative analysis. Furthermore, the associations observed between the patient characteristics and outcomes were not statistically significant, rendering our findings speculative.

Conclusions

ICI-associated myocarditis is an emerging clinical concern that has attracted the attention of cardiologists and oncologists. To integrate information on ICI-associated myocarditis, we recovered and analyzed the largest number of published case reports in our work. A reasonable workflow to manage ICI-associated myocarditis was proposed based on this article as follows: for severe cases (G3 or G4), discontinuation of ICIs, administration of high-dose glucocorticoids (methylprednisolone 1 g/day) and other drugs, plasma exchange, and life support measures; for moderate cases (G1 or G2), discontinuation of ICIs and administration of regular-dose glucocorticoids (methylprednisolone 1-2 mg/kg/day). Once full recovery or improvement is achieved, steroids must be adjusted to low doses (prednisone <10 mg/day) or discontinued. Moreover, re-challenge with ICIs appears feasible in selected patients based on the decisions made by the cardiovascular physician, oncologist, and patient.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

This study did not require ethical approval.

Author contributions

CW: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. GZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. LY: Data curation, Writing – original draft. SL: Data curation, Writing – original draft. GL: Data curation, Writing – original draft. HW: Data curation, Writing – original draft. JH: writing – original draft. SW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. NL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019XK320068), Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (International Pharmaceutical Clinical Research and Development Platform 2015), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (Platform Improvement of Clinical Trial Capability, 2020‐I2M‐2‐007), and the Beijing Municipal Health Commission, Beijing Demonstration Research Ward (BCRW20200303). The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology National Clinical Key Specialty Construction of Oncology 2023 Open Joint Fund Project (ZLKFJJ20230512).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1275254/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; ECG, electrocardiogram; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; CR/PR, complete response/partial response; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; LAG-3, lymphocyte activation gene 3; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; irAEs, immune-related adverse events; SD, stable disease; PG, progressive disease.

References

1. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2012) 12(4):252–64. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bagchi S, Yuan R, Engleman EG. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and resistance. Annu Rev Pathol (2021) 16:223–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sharma P, Siddiqui BA, Anandhan S, Yadav SS, Subudhi SK, Gao J, et al. The next decade of immune checkpoint therapy. Cancer Discovery (2021) 11(4):838–57. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sharma P, Allison JP. Dissecting the mechanisms of immune checkpoint therapy. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20(2):75–6. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0275-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Xin Yu J, Hodge JP, Oliva C, Neftelinov ST, Hubbard-Lucey VM, Tang J. Trends in clinical development for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2020) 19(3):163–4. doi: 10.1038/d41573-019-00182-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kennedy LB, Salama AKS. A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity. CA Cancer J Clin (2020) 70(2):86–104. doi: 10.3322/caac.21596

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Moslehi J, Lichtman AH, Sharpe AH, Galluzzi L, Kitsis RN. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: manifestations and mechanisms. J Clin Invest (2021) 131(5):e145186. doi: 10.1172/JCI145186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lichtman AH. The heart of the matter: protection of the myocardium from T cells. J Autoimmun (2013) 45:90–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lehmann LH, Cautela J, Palaskas N, Baik AH, Meijers WC, Allenbach Y, et al. Clinical strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: A narrative review. JAMA Cardiol (2021) 6(11):1329–37. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Caio G. Myocarditis with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med (2017) 376(3):291–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1615251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Moslehi JJ, Salem JE, Sosman JA, Lebrun-Vignes B, Johnson DB. Increased reporting of fatal immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis. Lancet (2018) 391(10124):933. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30533-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Salem JE, Manouchehri A, Moey M, Lebrun-Vignes B, Bastarache L, Pariente A, et al. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study. Lancet Oncol (2018) 19(12):1579–89. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30608-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mahmood SS, Fradley MG, Cohen JV, Nohria A, Reynolds KL, Heinzerling LM, et al. Myocarditis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol (2018) 71(16):1755–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Lyon AR, Lopez-Fernandez T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J (2022) 43(41):4229–361. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bonaca MP, Olenchock BA, Salem JE, Wiviott SD, Ederhy S, Cohen A, et al. Myocarditis in the setting of cancer therapeutics: proposed case definitions for emerging clinical syndromes in cardio-oncology. Circulation (2019) 140(2):80–91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Schneider BJ, Naidoo J, Santomasso BD, Lacchetti C, Adkins S, Anadkat M, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol (2021) 39(36):4073–126. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev (2016) 5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wang Q, Hu B. Successful therapy for autoimmune myocarditis with pembrolizumab treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Transl Med (2019) 7(11):247. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.73

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yang Y, Wu Q, Chen L, Qian K, Xu X. Severe immune-related hepatitis and myocarditis caused by PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: a case report. Ann Transl Med (2022) 10(7):424. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Al-Obaidi A, Parker NA, Choucair K, Alderson J, Deutsch JM. A case of acute heart failure following immunotherapy for metastatic lung cancer. Cureus (2020) 12(5):e8093. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Shindo A, Yamasaki M, Uchino K, Yamasaki M. Asymptomatic myocarditis with mild cardiac marker elevation following nivolumab-induced myositis. Int Heart J (2022) 63(1):180–3. doi: 10.1536/ihj.21-653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gallegos C, Rottmann D, Nguyen VQ, Baldassarre LA. Myocarditis with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: case report of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance with pathology correlate. Eur Heart J Case Rep (2019) 3(1):yty149. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/yty149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Shen L, Chen H, Wei Q. Immune-therapy-related toxicity events and dramatic remission after a single dose of pembrolizumab treatment in metastatic thymoma: A case report. Front Immunol (2021) 12:621858. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.621858

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kee W, Ng KYY, Lee JJX, Tan DSW. Myasthenia gravis and myocarditis after administration of pembrolizumab in a patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and resected thymoma. Clin Lung Cancer (2022) 23(4):e293–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zhang B, Gyawali L, Liu Z, Du H, Yin Y. Camrelizumab-related lethal arrhythmias and myasthenic crisis in a patient with metastatic thymoma. Case Rep Cardiol (2022) 2022:4042909. doi: 10.1155/2022/4042909

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wintersperger BJ, Calvillo-Arguelles O, Lheureux S, Houbois CP, Spreafico A, Bedard PL, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis: an illustrative case series of applying the updated Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Lake Louise Criteria. Eur Heart J Case Rep (2022) 6(1):ytab478. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Lie G, Weickhardt A, Kearney L, Lam Q, John T, Liew D, et al. Nivolumab resulting in persistently elevated troponin levels despite clinical remission of myocarditis and myositis in a patient with Malignant pleural mesothelioma: case report. Transl Lung Cancer Res (2020) 9(2):360–5. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.02.05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Bawek SJ, Ton R, McGovern-Poore M, Khoncarly B, Narvel R. Nivolumab-induced myasthenia gravis concomitant with myocarditis, myositis, and hepatitis. Cureus (2021) 13(9):e18040. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Delombaerde D, Vervloet D, Berwouts D, Beckers R, Prenen H, Peeters M, et al. Ipilimumab- and nivolumab-induced myocarditis in a patient with metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep (2022) 16(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s13256-022-03487-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zhou B, Li M, Chen T, She J. Case report: acute myocarditis due to PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab monotherapy in a patient with lung squamous cell carcinoma. Front Med (Lausanne) (2022) 9:866068. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.866068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hardy T, Yin M, Chavez JA, Ivanov I, Chen W, Nadasdy T, et al. Acute fatal myocarditis after a single dose of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, autopsy findings: a case report. Cardiovasc Pathol (2020) 46:107202. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2020.107202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, Chalkias S, Gorham J, Xu Y, et al. Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med (2016) 375(18):1749–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Kontorovich AR, Tang Y, Patel N, Georgievskaya Z, Shadrina M, Williams N, et al. Burden of cardiomyopathic genetic variation in lethal pediatric myocarditis. Circ Genom Precis Med (2021) 14(4):e003426. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Groarke JD, Cheng S, Moslehi J. Cancer-drug discovery and cardiovascular surveillance. N Engl J Med (2013) 369(19):1779–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1313140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Norwood TG, Westbrook BC, Johnson DB, Litovsky SH, Terry NL, McKee SB, et al. Smoldering myocarditis following immune checkpoint blockade. J Immunother Cancer (2017) 5(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0296-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Capone D, Del Rio A, Campanella G, De Marino V, Pisanti N. [Pharmacokinetic results of some antiepileptics]. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper (1988) 64(1):17–23.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

37. Moslehi JJ. Cardiovascular toxic effects of targeted cancer therapies. N Engl J Med (2016) 375(15):1457–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1100265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Baughman KL. Diagnosis of myocarditis: death of Dallas criteria. Circulation (2006) 113(4):593–5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.589663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Caforio ALP, Adler Y, Agostini C, Allanore Y, Anastasakis A, Arad M, et al. Diagnosis and management of myocardial involvement in systemic immune-mediated diseases: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease. Eur Heart J (2017) 38(35):2649–62. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Allenbach Y, Anquetil C, Manouchehri A, Benveniste O, Lambotte O, Lebrun-Vignes B, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myositis, the earliest and most lethal complication among rheumatic and musculoskeletal toxicities. Autoimmun Rev (2020) 19(8):102586. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102586

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Palaskas NL, Segura A, Lelenwa L, Siddiqui BA, Subudhi SK, Lopez-Mattei J, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis: elucidating the spectrum of disease through endomyocardial biopsy. Eur J Heart Fail (2021) 23(10):1725–35. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol (2018) 36(17):1714–68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Zhang L, Zlotoff DA, Awadalla M, Mahmood SS, Nohria A, Hassan MZO, et al. Major adverse cardiovascular events and the timing and dose of corticosteroids in immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis. Circulation (2020) 141(24):2031–4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044703

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Arangalage D, Delyon J, Lermuzeaux M, Ekpe K, Ederhy S, Pages C, et al. Survival after fulminant myocarditis induced by immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Ann Intern Med (2017) 167(9):683–4. doi: 10.7326/L17-0396

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Mahmood SS, Chen CL, Shapnik N, Krishnan U, Singh HS, Makker V. Myocarditis with tremelimumab plus durvalumab combination therapy for endometrial cancer: A case report. Gynecol Oncol Rep (2018) 25:74–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2018.05.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Salem JE, Allenbach Y, Vozy A, Brechot N, Johnson DB, Moslehi JJ, et al. Abatacept for severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis. N Engl J Med (2019) 380(24):2377–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1901677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Esfahani K, Buhlaiga N, Thebault P, Lapointe R, Johnson NA, Miller WH Jr. Alemtuzumab for immune-related myocarditis due to PD-1 therapy. N Engl J Med (2019) 380(24):2375–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1903064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Geraud A, Gougis P, Vozy A, Anquetil C, Allenbach Y, Romano E, et al. Clinical pharmacology and interplay of immune checkpoint agents: A yin-yang balance. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol (2021) 61:85–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-022820-093805

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Linsley PS, Wallace PM, Johnson J, Gibson MG, Greene JL, Ledbetter JA, et al. Immunosuppression in vivo by a soluble form of the CTLA-4 T cell activation molecule. Science (1992) 257(5071):792–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1496399

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Wei SC, Meijers WC, Axelrod ML, Anang NAS, Screever EM, Wescott EC, et al. A genetic mouse model recapitulates immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and supports a mechanism-based therapeutic intervention. Cancer Discovery (2021) 11(3):614–25. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0856

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Martinez-Calle N, Rodriguez-Otero P, Villar S, Mejias L, Melero I, Prosper F, et al. Anti-PD1 associated fulminant myocarditis after a single pembrolizumab dose: the role of occult pre-existing autoimmunity. Haematologica (2018) 103(7):e318–21. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.185777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Giancaterino S, Abushamat F, Duran J, Lupercio F, DeMaria A, Hsu JC. Complete heart block and subsequent sudden cardiac death from immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis. HeartRhythm Case Rep (2020) 6(10):761–4. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.07.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Saibil SD, Bonilla L, Majeed H, Sotov V, Hogg D, Chappell MA, et al. Fatal myocarditis and rhabdomyositis in a patient with stage IV melanoma treated with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab. Curr Oncol (2019) 26(3):e418–21. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Arora P, Talamo L, Dillon P, Gentzler RD, Millard T, Salerno M, et al. Severe combined cardiac and neuromuscular toxicity from immune checkpoint blockade: an institutional case series. Cardiooncology (2020) 6:21. doi: 10.1186/s40959-020-00076-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Portoles Hernandez A, Blanco Clemente M, Escribano Garcia D, Velasco Calvo R, Nunez Garcia B, Oteo Dominguez JF, et al. Checkpoint inhibitor-induced fulminant myocarditis, complete atrioventricular block and myasthenia gravis-a case report. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther (2021) 11(4):1013–9. doi: 10.21037/cdt-21-147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Cohen M, Mustafa S, Elkherpitawy I, Meleka M. A fatal case of pembrolizumab-induced myocarditis in non-small cell lung cancer. JACC Case Rep (2020) 2(3):426–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.12.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Jespersen MS, Fano S, Stenor C, Moller AK. A case report of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related steroid-refractory myocarditis and myasthenia gravis-like myositis treated with abatacept and mycophenolate mofetil. Eur Heart J Case Rep (2021) 5(11):ytab342. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Kociol RD, Cooper LT, Fang JC, Moslehi JJ, Pang PS, Sabe MA, et al. Recognition and initial management of fulminant myocarditis: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation (2020) 141(6):e69–92. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, Chandra S, Menzer C, Ye F, et al. Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol (2018) 4(12):1721–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Ramos-Casals M, Brahmer JR, Callahan MK, Flores-Chavez A, Keegan N, Khamashta MA, et al. Immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2020) 6(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0160-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar