Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Immunol., 14 September 2023
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research Topic Immunotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer View all 5 articles

Remarkable response to PD-1 inhibitor in a patient with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review

Ge Yuan&#x;Ge YuanXiangliang Liu&#x;Xiangliang LiuXinwei ZhangXinwei ZhangWei SongWei SongJin LuJin LuZhongyang DingZhongyang DingXiao Chen*Xiao Chen*
  • Cancer Center of The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

We report a case of a 59-year-old male diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). He received first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy and second-line topotecan-based regimen, but experienced disease progression after each line of therapy. He was then treated with Sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in combination with nab-paclitaxel in the third-line setting, which resulted in significant tumor shrinkage. Restaging scans showed a partial response per RECIST criteria with 62% reduction in tumor burden. This case highlights the application and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in extensive-stage SCLC.

Introduction

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancer cases and is characterized by rapid doubling time, early metastasis, and poor prognosis (1). Most patients present with metastatic disease at diagnosis, and only one-third are diagnosed at limited stage, where curative multimodality therapy can be delivered (2).

First-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC consists of platinum doublets (etoposide/cisplatin or irinotecan/cisplatin), but nearly all patients experience disease progression within months of completing chemotherapy (3, 4). Second-line topotecan has limited efficacy and substantial toxicity (5). In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have shown promising clinical activity in SCLC and have been approved for first-line and later-line treatment (6, 7). However, only a small subset of SCLC patients respond to ICIs, partly due to lack of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (8). Here, we present a case where Sintilimab treatment in the third-line setting led to substantial tumor regression and prolonged disease control in an extensive-stage SCLC patient. This exceptional response highlights the potential for ICIs to improve outcomes for selected SCLC patients. Reliable predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to identify SCLC patients most likely to respond to ICIs (9).

Case presentation

A 59-year-old male, never-smoker, presented with cough and dyspnea in December 2021. Diagnostic workup revealed extensive-stage SCLC with metastases to lymph nodes and brain. He received first-line etoposide/cisplatin for 6 cycles with best response of PR. In May 2022, restaging CT showed disease progression in the lungs and lymph nodes. Second-line irinotecan/anlotinib was administered for 3 cycles but the patient experienced further progression in the brain. He underwent palliative brain radiation in July 2022. In September 2022, the lung lesions enlarged again on CT. Third-line treatment with nab-paclitaxel and Sintilimab was initiated. Repeat CT in February 2023 demonstrated a partial response with 62% reduction in the lung mass. Durable disease control has been maintained through May 2023, with overall survival of 18 months so far (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Treatment timeline.

Discussion

SCLC is an aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy representing 14% of lung cancers (1). The high proliferative rate and early metastatic potential lead to dismal prognosis, with 5-year survival around 7% (10). First-line platinum doublets result in high response rates up to 70%, but nearly all SCLC patients relapse quickly (3). The median overall survival with first-line chemotherapy is only 10 months (4). Common second-line options include topotecan, amrubicin, and lurbinectedin, but efficacy is modest and short-lived (5, 11). By the third-line setting, treatment choices are limited and outcomes remain poor.

Recent Advances with Immunotherapy

ICIs targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have shown promising clinical activity in SCLC and NSCLC, which are now approved as first-line and later-line therapies (68). Despite this progress, only a minority of SCLC patients respond to ICIs. Proposed reasons include lack of TILs, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and suboptimal patient selection (5, 8). Identifying robust predictive biomarkers represents a key unmet need in this disease.

Our case demonstrates exceptional and durable response to Sintilimab in the third-line setting, with 62% tumor reduction by RECIST and progression-free survival of 9 months so far (Figure 2). However, exceptional responders like this patient remain the exception rather than the norm. Ongoing research is focused on better understanding and enhancing antitumor immune responses in SCLC. Efforts are underway to develop more rational biomarker-driven combination strategies to extend the benefits of immunotherapy to a greater proportion of SCLC patients,Previous studie have achieved favorable treatment outcomes with similar treatment regimens (7, 12).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Imaging changes during treatment. CT images demonstrating diagnosis, treatment responses, and progression. [(1, 2) Small cell lung cancer was first diagnosed (December 2021), CT scan showed a 3.8×2.2cm pulmonary nodule and brain metastases. (3). Minimal lung lesions during first-line chemotherapy (February 2022), CT scan showed a 0.8×1.4cm pulmonary nodule. (4). Progression after completion of first-line chemotherapy (May 2022), CT scan showed a 1.3×1.7cm pulmonary nodule. (5). Progression after completion of second-line chemotherapy (September 2022), CT scan showed a 2.1×1.6cm pulmonary nodule. (6). Partial remission was achieved after immunotherapy (February 2023), CT scan showed a 0.9×0.5cm pulmonary nodule).

Potential predictive biomarkers

In our case, the patient’s NLR and CEA levels closely paralleled his response to Sintilimab (Tables 1, 2). NLR peaked before immunotherapy then rapidly declined, mirroring his tumor regression. Elevated NLR is associated with poor prognosis across cancer types (13, 14). The sharp drop in NLR following immunotherapy corresponds with the patient’s exceptional outcome. Blood-based tumor mutational burden has also shown early promise as a predictive marker for ICIs in relapsed SCLC (12, 15). These findings suggest CEA and NLR warrant further study as potential biomarkers of ICI benefit in SCLC.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 CEA levels during treatment.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 NLR during treatment.

Conclusions

In summary, our case demonstrates remarkable antitumor activity of the PD-1 inhibitor Sintilimab in a heavily pretreated SCLC patient. ICIs represent a promising new therapeutic avenue for some SCLC patients who have exhausted standard therapies. Ongoing research aims to expand the proportion of SCLC patients deriving durable benefit from immunotherapy through development of reliable predictive biomarkers and rational combination approaches.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

GY: Writing – original draft. XL: Writing – review & editing. XZ: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. WS: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. JL: Writing – review & editing, Project administration. ZD: Writing – review & editing. XC: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Rudin CM, Brambilla E, Faivre-Finn C, Sage J. Small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2021) 7(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00235-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Micke P, Faldum A, Metz T, Beeh KM, Bittinger F, Hengstler JG, et al. Staging small cell lung cancer: Veterans Administration Lung Study Group versus International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer–what limits limited disease? Lung Cancer (2002) 37(3):271–6. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(02)00072-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Dingemans AC, Fruh M, Ardizzoni A, Besse B, Faivre-Finn C, Hendriks LE, et al. Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up(☆). Ann Oncol (2021) 32(7):839–53. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Alexander M, Kim SY, Cheng H. Update 2020: management of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung (2020) 198(6):897–907. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00407-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Manzo A, Sforza V, Carillio G, Palumbo G, Montanino A, Sandomenico C, et al. Lurbinectedin in small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol (2022) 12:932105. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.932105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Iams WT, Porter J, Horn L. Immunotherapeutic approaches for small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2020) 17(5):300–12. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0316-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Esposito G, Palumbo G, Carillio G, Manzo A, Montanino A, Sforza V, et al. Immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(9), 2522. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092522

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zhou C, Wu L, Fan Y, Wang Z, Liu L, Chen G, et al. Sintilimab plus platinum and gemcitabine as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ORIENT-12). J Thorac Oncol (2021) 16(9):1501–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Niu X, Chen L, Li Y, Hu Z, He F. Ferroptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis in the tumor microenvironment: Perspectives for immunotherapy of SCLC. Semin Cancer Biol (2022) 86(Pt 3):273–85. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ragavan M, Das M. Systemic therapy of extensive stage small cell lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol (2020) 21(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-00762-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Meijer JJ, Leonetti A, Airo G, Tiseo M, Rolfo C, Giovannetti E, et al. Small cell lung cancer: Novel treatments beyond immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol (2022) 86(Pt 2):376–85. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Iams WT, Shiuan E, Meador CB, Roth M, Bordeaux J, Vaupel C, et al. Improved prognosis and increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients who have SCLC with neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes. J Thorac Oncol (2019) 14(11):1970–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.05.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ito F, Sato T, Emoto K, Kaizuka N, Yagi K, Watanabe R, et al. Standard therapy-resistant small cell lung cancer showing dynamic transition of neuroendocrine fate during the cancer trajectory: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol (2021) 15(6):261. doi: 10.3892/mco.2021.2423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yamamoto T, Kawada K, Obama K. Inflammation-related biomarkers for the prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(15):8002. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bonanno L, Pavan A, Di Liso E, Schiavon M, Comacchio G, Attili I, et al. The role of immune microenvironment in small-cell lung cancer: Distribution of PD-L1 expression and prognostic role of FOXP3-positive tumour infiltrating lymphocytes. Eur J Cancer (2018) 101:191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: small cell lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1, NLR, CEA

Citation: Yuan G, Liu X, Zhang X, Song W, Lu J, Ding Z and Chen X (2023) Remarkable response to PD-1 inhibitor in a patient with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review. Front. Immunol. 14:1267606. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267606

Received: 26 July 2023; Accepted: 29 August 2023;
Published: 14 September 2023.

Edited by:

Alessandro Russo, A.O. Papardo, Italy

Reviewed by:

Karim Amrane, Morlaix Hospital, Morlaix, France
Bin Zhang, Dalian Medical University, China

Copyright © 2023 Yuan, Liu, Zhang, Song, Lu, Ding and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiao Chen, chenxiao@jlu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.